HomeMy WebLinkAbout5580 RESOLUTION NO 5580
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS
ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE PROCESSING OF SOCIO-
ECONOMIC ANALYSES AND COSTBENEFIT STUDIES PURSUANT TO THE
REDLANDS GENERAL PLAN ( MEASURE "U")
RECITALS
WHEREAS,on November 4, 19 97 the voters ofthe City of Redlands approved Measure"U,"
an initiative ordinance of the people of Redlands, which amended the Redlands General Plan by
establishing "principals of managed development," and
WHEREAS, the results of the election were certified on December 2, 1997, and Measure
"U" became effective on December 12, 1997, and
WHEREAS,Measure"U"requires certain specified development projects to submit a socio-
economic analysis and cost/benefit study identifying the source of funding for necessary public
infrastructure and reflecting the effect of such development on the City,as part of the development
application process, and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Measure "U," approval of development projects subject to
the socio-economic analysis and cost/benefit study shall not occur unless the socio-economic
analysis and cost/benefit study finds and determines,to the satisfaction of the City Council,that the
development project will not create unmitigated physical blight within the City or overburden public
services,and the benefit of the development project to the City outweighs any direct cost to the City,
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has retained the consulting firm of David Taussig and
Associates to prepare a model cost/benefit study and has appointed a citizens committee to
recommend socio- economic criteria to the City Council for inclusion within the socio-economic
analysis of projects, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at several public meetings, has (1) reviewed and
considered the citizen committee's recommendations and the model cost/benefit study prepared by
David Taussig and Associates,(2)developed with staff a socio-economic evaluation checklist, and
evaluated two sample projects, and (3) subsequently recommended the City Council adopt the
socio-economic evaluation checklist and model costibenefit study, and
WHEREAS,the City Council held noticed public meetings on November 10, 1998,November
17, 1998 and December 1, 1998 and reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Planning
Commission, the citizen committee's recommended socio-economic criteria, the socio-economic
analysis prepared by a subcommittee of the citizens committee,the model costibenefit study prepared
by David Taussig and Associates, the proposal by the Planning Commission and staff of a socio-
DJM I279P W 1
economic evaluation checklist,evaluated two sample projects using the socio-economic evaluation
checklist and model cost/benefit study, and heard and considered public testing on the socio-
economic analysis and cost/benefit study requirements of the Redlands General Plan,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS
Section 1 The City Council hereby establishes the following procedures for the processing
of socio-economic analyses and cost/benefit studies as required by Redlands' General Plan
A All development projects so required by the Redlands General Plan shall submit to the City
an application for the socio-economic evaluation checklist in the form attached hereto as Exhibit"A,"
and a cost/benefit study in the form attached hereto as Exhibit `B," as part of the development
application process The applicant for the project shall complete and file the application for a socio-
economic analysis and cost/benefit study, and pay the applicable fee, with the Community
Development Department of the City The City shall determine and notify the applicant, within
thirty (30) days of its receipt of an application, whether the application is complete
B The City shall process completed socio-economic analysis and cost/benefit study
applications in accordance with the following procedures.
1 Form of Studv The socio-economic analysis and cost/benefit study shall be
prepared by the City and reviewed as a separate document,but as required by the Redlands General
Plan, processed in conjunction with, and at the same time as, environmental review of the project
under the California Environmental Quality Act. The applicant shall be responsible for the payment
of all costs incurred by the City in processing a socio-economic analysis and cost/benefit study
2 Processine Procedure City staff, acting as the Environmental Review
Committee, shall review all socio-economic analyses and cost/benefit studies and make its
recommendation on the same to the Planning Commission and the City Council The Environmental
Review Committee may also require the preparation of additional studies to provide information
for the Planning Commission and City Council to evaluate those impacts identified as "potentially
significant" under the evaluation checklist The determination of the Environmental Review
Committee shall be delivered to the project applicant and made available to the public, in writing,
within ten (10) days of the review of the socio-economic analysis and cost/benefit studies by the
Environmental Review Committee Dependant upon the expertise required,such additional studies
maybe prepared by City staff or by an independent consultant under contract to the City Regardless
of the manner of preparation of such additional studies,the costs of the studies shall be paid for by
the project applicant
3 Apeals The applicant, and any member of the public, may appeal the
decision of the Environmental Review Committee to require, or not to require, additional studies
under the socio-economic analysis and cost/benefit study to the City Council Any such appeal shall
be filed with the City Clerk, within ten (10) days of the written decision of the Environmental
DJM 1279i'W 2
Review Committee, on the form provided by the City and with payment of the applicable fee
4 Notification Notification to the community that a project is being considered
by the City and is being evaluated for its socio-economic analysis and cost/benefit study shall occur
at the earliest time possible in the development review process, and throughout the review process
Notice shall be provided by the City in the following ways (1) A ten day notice published in a
newspaper of general circulation within the City and mailed to all property owners within a 300 foot
radius of the project for all hearings before the Environmental Review Committee, the Planning
Commission and the City Council,(2)Advance listing,as an agenda item for City Council meetings,
of upcoming Environmental Review Committee and Planning Commission meetings, and (3)
notification may also occur by way of the City's Internet "web" site
5 Tvt)es of Development Protects By adoption of Resolution No 5579, the
City Council has determined that the type of development project required by Measure"U"to submit
a socio-economic impact report is a development project which illustrates a specific plan for building
design or construction, such as a subdivision map, conditional use permit, commission review and
approval or building permit, not a development project which merely consists of a general plan
amendment, specific plan amendment or zone change
6 Determination by City Council In accordance with the Redlands General
Plan, no development project subject to a socio-economic analysis and costibenefit study shall be
approved if the socio-economic analysis and cost/benefit study demonstrates that the development
project will create unmitigated physical blight within the City or overburden public services,and that
the benefit of the project does not outweigh any direct cost of the project to the City, except upon
a 4/5ths vote of the members of the City Council
7 Administrative Re:?ulations The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the
Community Development Director to establish written guidelines, applications and recommended fees to
further carry out the intentions and direction of the City Council in adopting this Resolution and establishing
procedures for the processing of socio-economic analyses and cost/benefit studies
ADOPTED SIGNED AND APPROVED this 1st day of December, 1998
1
Layor, ity of Redlan
Attest
Ciry Ci�k
DJM1279PW 3
I,Lorrie Poyzer,City Clerk,City of Redlands,hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted
by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the lst day of December, 1998 by the
following vote
AYES Councilmembers Banda, Gilbreath, George, Freedman,
Mayor Cunningham
NOES None
ABSTAIN None
ABSENT None
City C*' City o" t gl nds
DJM 1279P W 4
EXH I BIT "A"
SOCIO-ECONOMIC
EVALUATION
CHECKLIST
AND
THRESHOLDS
Table of Contents
Subiect Pa e
Title page 1
Table of Contents 2
Socio-economic Cost Benefit Process 3
Background Information 4
Cost Benefit Factors 5
Public Infrastructure and Effect on City of Redlands 5
Benefits of the Project 6-12
Citrus Enhancements or Preservation 6
Cultural Enhancements or Preservation 6
Heritage Enhancements or Preservation 7
Architectural Enhancements 7
Historic Downtown Enhancements or Preservation 8
Job Enhancements 8
Open Space Enhancements or Preservation 9
Park Enhancements or Preservation 9
Public Safety Enhancements 10
School Enhancements 10
Traffic 11
Wastewater System Enhancements 11
MEscelaneous Enhancements or Preservation 12
Social Factors Potentially Affected 13
Evaluation of Social Factors 14-24
Thresholds (Appendix A) Pages 1-27
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Process
Purpose The socio-economic cost/benefit evaluation process implements provisions of
the voter initiative, Measure "U" which has been incorporated into the City of Redlands
General Plan The evaluation assures that future development within the City of
Redlands occurs in a way that promotes the social and economic well-being of the
entire community The process will assist in the preservation of the unique character of
the City of Redlands as a quiet university town surrounded by agricultural and citrus
producing lands The initiative measure provides for managed growth that will not lead
to a deterioration of the quality of life now enjoyed by the citizens of Redlands and
promotes the public health, safety and welfare
Process (1) Submittal of an aDDhcation Applications for processing are available
from the Community Development Department The application will request submittal
of information pertaining to your project which will be utilized in the cost/benefit model,
socio-economic checklist, environmental checklist, and development review of the
application
(2) Environmental Review Committee The Environmental Review
Committee is made up of the City Manager, Community Development Director, Public
Works Director, Fire Chief and Utilities Director The Committee reviews and evaluates
the cost/benefit model, socio-economic checklist, and environmental checklist and
makes a recommendation to the Planning Commission and City Council on these
matters The actions of the Committee may be appealed by the applicant or other
member of the public directly to the City Council
(3) Plannina Commission The Planning Commission is made up of a
seven member board appointed by the City Council The Planning Commission
reviews and evaluates the cost/benefit model, socio-economic checklist, environmental
checklist, and the development application and makes a recommendation to the City
Council on these matters
(4) City Council The City Council is made up of five elected members
one of which is selected and serves as Mayor The City Council reviews and evaluates
the cost/benefit model, socio-economic checklist, environmental checklist, and the
development application and takes a final action on these matters
Processina Time The Community Development Department is responsible for
scheduling projects Schedules are available from the Department identifying submittal
dates and future meetings Most development projects are processed within 90 days
Fees Processing fees are established to pay for the costs associated with the
processing of the requests being considered by City Fees are imposed on all
processes to include socio-economic cost/benefit evaluation and analysis,
environmental review, and development application(s) A fee schedule is available from
the Community Development Department
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 12/1198
Page 4
SOCIO-ECONOMIC EVALUATION CHECKLIST FORM
BACKGROUND
1 Project Title
2 Contact Person and Phone Number
3 Project Location
4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address.
5 General Plan Designation:
6 Zoning:
7 Description of Project:
8 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 5
COST BENEFIT FACTORS
The cost benefit factors are evaluated independently using the cost benefit model A
positive or negative cost/benefit ratio will be derived by evaluating projects A complete
model used to evaluate the project is available in the Community Development
Department A summary of that analysis is provided here
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND EFFECT ON THE CITY OF REDLANDS:
Identify the public infrastructure required for development of this project and identify the
source(s) of funding for these improvements Identify the effects of such development
upon the City of Redlands
List of public infrastructure required for the project
Sources of funding for these improvements to include developer installed, payment of
impact fees, assessment districts, etc
The effect of the project upon the City of Redlands relative to public infrastructure is as
follows
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 6
BENEFITS OF THE PROJECT TO THE CITY OF REDLANDS
The following is a list of benefits that can be attributed to the proposed project The
benefits may fall into the categories identified or a miscellaneous category Each
benefit identified will be described in detail with supporting reasons as to how the item
benefits the community
A Citrus Enhancements or Preservation Does the project preserve citrus's The
following are accepted ways to enhance or preserve citrus which may be determined to
be a benefit to the City of Redlands
1 Provide conservation easement(s) on citrus groves the City
hopes to preserve
2 Acquire citrus grove(s) and donate all or a portion of the
grove to the City
3 Enhance viability and productivity of existing groves by
enhancing irrigation or adding frost water
4 Maintain a viable buffer of citrus around the project (at least
3 rows)
5 Other ways to preserve citrus
If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to citrus enhancement or preservation,
describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits
the community
B. Cultural Enhancements or Preservation Does the project enhance or preserve
cultural aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or
preserve cultural aspects of the community which may be determined to be a benefit to
the City of Redlands
1 Contributes to "art in public places" concept to a minimum of
I% of total project value
2 Contributes to the alleviation of problems at cultural sites
3 Provides an electronic library available to the public
4 Enhances or contributes to current services or cultural
resources
5 Contribute to performing arts venues
If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to cultural enhancements or preservation,
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 7
describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits
the community
C Heritage Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or
preserve heritage aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to
enhance and/or preserve heritage aspects of the community which may be determined
to be a benefit to the City of Redlands
1 Renovates existing historic homes
2 The project has design features which include garage doors
do not face street, 50% wrap around porch on 1-112 sides,
broad overhangs on roof, driveway located on the side of
house or a circular drive, decorative wood, masonry or
wrought iron fence
3 Adaptive reuse of historic structures in appropriate zones
4 Forming a new or annexing to an existing historic district
5 Designation of a structure as an individual historic resource
If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to heritage enhancements or preservation,
describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits
the community
D Architectural Enhancements. Does the project enhance architectural aspects of
the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance architectural aspects of
the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands
1 Provide architectural or decorative enhancements to the
project which exceed normal architectural standards
2 Trees or other landscaping amenities that exceed minimum requirements
3 Contribution of off-site enhancements to the public right-of-way,
such as sidewalk installation and street tree replacement
4 Assisting in undergrounding of utility lines
If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to architectural enhancements, describe in
detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the
community
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 8
E Historic Downtown Enhancements or Preservation Does the project enhance
or preserve the historic downtown of the community? The following are accepted ways
to enhance and/or preserve the historic downtown of the community which may be
determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands
1 Contributes financially to viability of core downtown within
expanded downtown
2 Renovate old buildings
3 Within an expanded downtown extends DRBA street scape
enhancements
4 Contributing to the restoration of original budding facades of
existing structures
5 Re-establishing historical "pedestrian oriented" street
frontages where original buildings have been removed
6 Provides unique adaptive use of historic building
7 Contributes to alternative means of transportation
If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to historic downtown enhancements or
preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the
item(s) benefits the community
F. Job Enhancements Does the project enhance jobs for the community? The
following are accepted ways to enhance jobs for the community which may be
determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands
1 Provides jobs for the community
2 Brings in revenue from outside the city
3 Internship opportunities for students at universities, high
school and colleges
If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to job enhancements, describe in detail the
benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 9
G. Open Space Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or
preserve open space aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to
enhance and/or preserve open space within the community which may be determined
to be a benefit to the City of Redlands
1 Hard scape feature that enhances wildlife- water/food/
shelter
2 Enhanced landscape on commercial project which conceals
infrastructure
3 Waterscaping which increases illusion of open space
4 Provides open space in addition to zoning requirement
5 Provides a Planned Residential Development
6 Provides a usable conservation easement across open space in
perpetuity
7 Preserves access for wildlife migration corridor
8 Provides undisturbed refuge area for wildlife
If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to open space enhancements or
preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the
item(s) benefits the community
H. Park Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve
parks of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve
parks within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of
Redlands
1 Adds improved parkland
2 Adds parkland beyond requirements
3 Provides pedestrian and/or bike trails to parks or provides
extension of existing pedestrian and/or bike trails from the
project site
4 Adds meeting rooms accessible to local groups on a
frequent basis
5 Improves or adds to existing landscape and/or street scape
at or near the project site
If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to park enhancements or preservation,
describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits
F {
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 10
the community
1. Public Safety Enhancements. Does the project enhance public safety aspects of
the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance public safety within the
community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands
1 Security infrastructure is provided in an architecturally
acceptable manner
2. Exterior television monitoring on commercial project
3. Provide a building site or fully equipped fire station or
contributes to dedicated City account for future construction
4 Provides significant additional fire equipment as determined
by the Fire Department
5 Provides for a police substation (subject to City approval)
6 Provides for a building site for a new facility
If this protect provides benefit(s) that apply to public safety enhancements, describe in
detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the
community
J School Enhancements. Does the protect enhance schools or their operations
within the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance schools within the
community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands
1 Senior citizen development adds revenue but no impact
2 Provides day care and after school program(s)
3 Project is close to schools serving the project
4 Contributes equipment or other enhancements to existing
day care and afer school programs
5 Assist schools with land or financing (such as Mello Roos)
If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to schools, describe in detail the benefit(s)
with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 11
K. Traffic Does the protect reduce traffic, enhance systems to improve traffic
conditions or otherwise improve traffic within the community? The following are
accepted ways to improve traffic within the community which may be determined to be
a benefit to the City of Redlands
1 Provide financial mitigation which helps alleviate parking
problems in town i e by contributing to the parking district
2 Incorporate "traffic calming" elements into the design of the
circulation system
3 Support for alternative forms of public transportation or
public transportation facilities
4 Add biking and pedestrian access to off campus intellectual
or entertainment resources
5 Have a unique method of product/inventory delivery
If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to traffic, describe in detail the benefit(s) with
supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community
L Wastewater System Enhancements. Does the project enhance the wastewater
system within the community? The following are accepted ways to improve the
wastewater system within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to
the City of Redlands
1 Provide a dual system to use potable and non-potable
water
2 Provide financial contributions to tertiary facilities at the
Wastewater Treatment Plant
3 Improve water quality
If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to the wastewater system, describe in detail
the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 12
M Miscellaneous Preservation or Enhancements Does the project enhance or
preserve elements within the community?
If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to enhancement or preservation of elements
that are important to the City, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons
as to how the item(s) benefits the community
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 13
SOCIAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
This project may create unmitlgable physical blight or overburden public services for
those social factors checked below within the "Potentially Significant," "Potentially
Significant Unless Mitigation" or "Less Than Significant" as indicated by the checklist on
the following pages
— Agricultural/Citrus Removal — Police Services — Recreational Programs
_ Wildlifefflabitat — Downtown Impacts — Land Use Compatibility
_ Traffic — Residential Design — Schools
_ Fire Services _ Cultural Facilities
Paramedic Services Park Facilities
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation
I find that the proposed project will not create unmitlgable physical blight or
overburden public services in the community, and no additional information or
evaluation is needed
I find that although the proposed project could create unmitlgable physical blight
or overburden public services in the community, there will not be a significant
effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project by the applicant
I find that the proposed project may create unmitigable physical blight or
overburden public services in the community, and additional information or
evaluation is needed in the following areas
I find that the proposed project has already been evaluated for socio-economic
impacts and the prior evaluation adequately evaluated this project
Signed
Jeffrey L Shaw, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Redlands
<lnsert Date Text>
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 14
EVALUATION OF SOCIAL FACTORS
Explanations of all "Potentially Significant," "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation
Incorporated," "Less Than Significant Impact," and "No Impact" answers are provided
on the attached sheets
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Issues and Supporting information Sources Impact Incorporated impact Impact
1 AGRICULTURAUCITRUS REMOVAL. Would the
proposal
a) Affect agricultural resources or operations
(e g impacts to sods or farmlands, or impacts
from incompatible land uses) ?
b) Remove active citrus groves from production?
Aaricultural/Citrus Removal
1 a)
1 b)
6
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 15
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Signfcant No
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
2. WILDLIFEMABITATIOPEN SPACE
PRESERVATION Would the proposal
a) Eliminate or have negative impact upon
wildlife corridors?
b) Tend to urbanize open space
impacting preservation and
conservation of natural
resources?
c) Interfere with use of recognized
trails used by doggers, hikers,
equestrians or bicyclists?
d) Eliminate, reduce, or have any
negative impact upon wildlife habitat
areas to include the protection of fringe
or buffer areas?
WildlifelHab'rtatfOpen Space Preservation
2 a)
2 b)
2 c)
2 d)
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 16
Potentially Potentially
Sign cant Significant
Impact Unless Less Than
Mitigation Significant No
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Incorporated Impact Impact
3 TRAFFIC. Would the proposal
a) Result in increased vehicle trips or
congestion?
b ) Create additional traffic so as to be in
conflict with the policies of the General
Plan?
c ) Does traffic impact livability of a
residential neighborhood on streets
which, due to design or terrain
features, street side development or
other factors, have greater than usual
sensitivity to increased traffic?
d ) Create additional traffic so as to increase the
level of service on roadways that are adjacent
to or in the vicinity of the project? _
Traffic Impacts
3 a)
3 b)
3 c)
3 d)
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 17
Potentially
Significant
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
4 FIRE AND PARAMEDIC SERVICES Will the
proposal result in
a) Requiring fire and paramedic services that are
beyond the current capabilities of the Fire
Department?
b) An increase in response time for essential fire
or paramedic services to the remainder of the
community?
c) The need for additional fire or paramedic
facilities or equipment?
Fire and Paramedic Services
4 a)
4 b)
4 c)
r
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 18
Potentially
Signdieant
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potonlially Unless Less Than
Slgnftanl Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
5 POLICE SERVICES, Would the proposal result in
a) Requiring police services that are beyond the
current capabilities of the Police
Department?
b) An increase in response time for essential
police services to the remainder of the
community? _
c) The need for additional police facilities or
equipment?
d) increase in crime as a result of
the type of business? _
Police Services
5 a)
5 b)
5 c)
5 d)
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 19
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Signrficant Mitigation &gnificant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
6. DOWNTOWN IMPACTS Would the proposal result
in
a) A reduction of the number or types of
businesses located in the downtown? —
b) An unfair or unreasonable competitive
disadvantage to existing businesses
downtown? — — —
c) Creation of vacant buildings and the potential
for blight? — —
d) Cause an unreasonable
increase in traffic downtown? — —
e) Economic and social effects of
businesses competing with
downtown businesses?
Downtown Impacts
6 a)
6 b)
6 c)
6 d)
6 e)
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 12111198
Page 20
Potentially
SignMicant
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Unless Less Than
Sign ficant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact impact
7 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN. Would the proposal
a) Conflict with existing codes and or standards? _ _ _ —
b) Meet minimum point standards of the
Residential Development Allocation process? — _ _ _
Residential Design
7 a)
7 b)
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 21
Potentially
Significant
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Unless Less Than
SigndIcanl Mitigation Significant No
impact Incorporated Impact Impact
8. CULTURAL FACILITIES Would the proposal result
in
a) Impacts to an historic residential structure,
neighborhood, or district? _
b) Impacts to an historic commercial structure or
district?
C) Impacts to cultural facilities such as the
Smiley Library, Redlands Bowl, Lincoln
Shrine, Joslyn Center, Community Center,
etc?
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural
values? _
e) Potential to disturb existing religious
facilities
f) Impact or restrict religious or sacred
uses _
Cultural Facilities
8 a)
8 b)
8 c)
8 d)
8 e)
8 f)
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 121119$
Page 22
Potentially
SignEficant
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Polemiaily Unless Less Than
Sign'ficant Mit#gallon Signficant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
9. PARK FACILITIES AND RECREATIONAL
PROGRAMS Will the proposal result in
a) Increases in use or demand for park facilities
or programs to include manpower, facilities or
equipment? _
b) A ratio of parkland to population which
exceeds standards and or goals established
by the General Plan?
Park Facilities and Recreational Proarams
9 a)
9 b)
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 23
Potentially
Significant
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
10. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY Would the proposal
result in
a) Land uses that are not compatible or
consistent with the General Plan?
b) Economic impacts on
businesses and small property
owners from a protect
C) Physical separation or division
of an existing community
d) Loss of jobs for the community?
e) Overcrowding of housing?
Land Use Compatibility
10 a)
10 b)
10 c)
10 d)
10 e)
Socio-Economic Evaluation Checklist 1211198
Page 24
Potentially
Significant
Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact €ncorporated Impact Impact
11 SCHOOLS. Would the proposal result in
a) Creating an overcapacity in schools?
b) The need for additional school facilities or
equipment ?
C) Land uses not consistent with or
compatible with existing
educational facilities in
community?
d) Social or academic impacts on
students resulting from school
closures
Schools.
11 a)
11 b)
11 c)
11 d)
Form revised on 1211198
Thresholds to be considered in preparation of the
Socioeconomic Checklist and evaluation
The following is a listing of thresholds which will be used to evaluate factors for projects
being considered in the socioeconomic checklist These thresholds are from existing
policy documents to include the City of Redlands General Plan, City of Redlands
MENEIR of the General Plan, the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan, the Downtown
Specific Plan, the Redlands Municipal Code, the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines, and other code and policy documents utilized by the City of Redlands The
thresholds may be utilized to evaluate both the benefits and impacts of a project The
thresholds are arranged by the categories identified in the socioeconomic checklist
1. Aaricultural/Citrus
The following exhibits, documents and policies establish thresholds for this category In
evaluating these thresholds the size of property, relationship of the site to surrounding
land uses, and site attributes will be considered
a Prime Agricultural Lands (MEAIEIR Figure 5 2)
b Williamson Act Lands (General Plan Figure 7 3)
c City or County Agricultural Preserve Area (General Plan Figure 7 3)
d Land Use Designation of Rural Living, Agricultural, and/or Agricultural CG
(General Plan Land Use Map Figure 4 1)
e Land to Active Citrus Agricultural Production after November 3, 1986
f Currently in Active Citrus Agricultural production
g Adjacent land in active citrus agricultural production
h 741a Retain the maximum feasible amount of agricultural open space for
its contributions to the local economy, lifestyle, air quality, habitat value
and sense of Redlands' heritage
I 7 41 b Provide for continued operation of existing livestock/dairy farms in
areas of the San TimoteolLive Oak Canyon planning sector designated
Rural Living and Very Low Density on the General Plan Diagram
i 7 41 c Encourage retention or establishment of horse stables and riding
academies in the San Timoteo/ Live Oak Canyon planning sector to meet
the needs of the Planning Area's equestrians
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 2
k 7 41 d Employ zoning for agricultural use, City ownership, transfer of
density, and zoning for rural living to maintain citrus and other croplands in
production where designated on the General Plan Diagram
I 741e Encourage formation of a land trust to make the most efficient use
of funds available for agricultural preservation
m 2 Oe Encourage and promote orderly development and growth of urban
areas while maintaining and encouraging the best possible use of
agricultural land, protecting it against premature encroachment of
non-agricultural development Consider the costs of extending urban
facilities and services in the review of urban development
n 310a Preserve awareness of Redlands' heritage as the navel orange
capital by employing a variety of techniques to preserve agriculture
0 3 1 Of Establish or reinforce City entrances that announce arrival and
convey the spirit of the City
p 3 29a Encourage preservation of citrus groves and other agricultural
areas that are designated as having cultural or scenic significance
Encourage retention of existing privately owned citrus groves of all sizes,
especially in historic neighborhoods
q 3 29b Identify existing agricultural areas, scenic views, vistas, and
streetscapes, including mountain, canyon, and valley vistas, urban view
corridors, focal points and focal buildings
r 3 29c Define and implement measures to preserve citrus groves, scenic
views, vistas, and streetscapes for the community
s 4 62o Preserve existing viable agricultural activities in the East Valley
Corridor as long as feasible while the area transitions to more intensive
uses
t EVCSP, EV2 026(a)(4)(A) In Planned Unit Developments, encourage phasing of
projects to preserve agricultural uses as long as possible
u CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, Convert prime agricultural land to non-agricultural
use or impair the agricultural productivity of prime agricultural land
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 3
2 WEldlifelHabitattOoen Space Preservation
The following exhibits, documents and policies establish thresholds for this category In
evaluating these thresholds the size of property, relationship of the site to surrounding
land uses, and site attributes will be considered
a Biotic Resources (General Plan Figure 7 2)
b Wildlife Corridors (General Plan Figure 7 2)
c Trails Map (General Plan Figure 7 1)
d 7 21 a Minimae disruption of wildlife and valued habitat throughout the
Planning Area
e 7 21 b Preserve, protect, and enhance natural communities of special
status
f 721c Recognize the links between biotic resources indiscrete locations
throughout Redlands
g 721d Preserve, protect, and enhance wildlife corridors connecting the
San Bernardino National Forest, Santa Ana River Wash, Crafton Hills, San
Timoteo/Live Oak Canyons, the Badlands, and other open space areas
h 7 21e Preserve, restore, protect, and enhance riparian corridors
throughout the Planning Area
i 7 21f Where feasible, landscape public areas using native vegetation
7 21g Prepare a Master Biotic Management Plan, including an inventory
of protected and common species, and species management plans, where
relevant
k 7 21 h Require a biological assessment of any proposed project site
where species or the habitat of species defined as sensitive or special
status by the Department of Fish and Game or the U S Fish and Wildlife
Service might be present
1 7 211 Require that proposed projects adjacent to, surrounding, or
containing wetlands, riparian corridors, or wildlife corridors be subject to a
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 4
site-specific analysis which will determine the appropriate size and
configuration of a buffer zone
m 7 21t Construct freeway and arterial street undercrossings where
necessary after identification of and as a part of establishment and
preservation of wildlife corridors
n 7 21k Enhance and restore the ZanJa and tributary drainages as riparian
corridors, where feasible, to provide habitat as well as recreational and
aesthetic value
0 7 211 Encourage the U S Army Corps of Engineers to design "soft"
channel and sedimentation basins to provide habitat as well as
recreational and aesthetic value
p 7 21 m Work with the Crafton Hills Conservancy to preserve, enhance, and
maintain the Crafton Hills as an ecosystem
q 7 21 n Coordinate open space and habitat preservation in San Timoteo
and Live Oak canyons with Riverside County
r 7 21 o Coordinate with the City of Yucaipa on habitat preservation along
Yucaipa Creek and in Live Oak Canyon throughout its length
S 7 21 p Work with the developers, biologists, and residents to implement
the Sunset Hills Deer Management Plan in San Timoteo and Live Oak
Canyon areas
t 7 21q Support the U S Army Corps of Engineers' efforts to establish a
preserve for the Santa Ana River Wooly Star as mitigation for habitat
anticipated to be lost as a result of construction of the Seven Oaks Dam,
and work with concerned agencies and organizations to preserve the
species in the Planning Area
u 7 21 r Work with concerned agencies and organizations to preserve the
Slender-horned Spineflower
v 7 21 s Coordinate aggregate resource extraction with habitat
preservation and protection of plant and animal species
w 7 21t Evaluate the habitat value of agricultural fields and groves prior to
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 5
conversion to other uses, if habitat value is significant, consider a
development plan which incorporates open space uses of similar value
x 7 21 u Make information available to residents concerning the presence
and condition of special status species
y 7 21v Coordinate trails with preservation of habitat and protection of
species sensitive to human intrusion
z 721w Expand the City's Official Street Tree List to incorporate native
trees
as 7 21x Explore opportunities to have nature displays along the Santa Ana
River in conjunction with trails to provide environmental and habitat
information
bb. 4 42b The perception of the signature features of the area shall be
preserved, maintained, and, where possible, enhanced
cc 4 42c The canyon walls immediately below the signature ridges and the
vegetation thereon shall be preserved and enhanced where appropriate
Canyon walls associated with the signature ridges wherein a
predominance of the slopes are in excess of 50% shall be preserved intact
dd 4 42d Both signature ridges and major ridges within canyons shall be
preserved and enhanced Significant modification of these ridges shall
occur only where offsetting need is demonstrated Development on
ridgelines is allowed as long as it stays within the parameters of this
policy "Offsetting need" is defined as a demonstration that the grade of a
specific parcel requires modification of an existing ridge line to produce
sufficient space to site a building pad and that the result will not eliminate
the continuity of the ridge line through grading or construction of
structures
ee 4 42e Ridges not identified as major ridges within a canyon may be
modified to facilitate development within the canyon so long as their
collective perception as canyon wall buttresses remains intact
ff 4 42f The narrow side canyon bottoms within the lower portions of the
mayor canyons-and particularly those around the edges of the major
bottoms-may be modified to accommodate proposed development
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 6
consistent with the development criteria in this section of the Land Use
Element
gg 4 42g The steep ridge and canyon system between Planning Sectors 1 &
2 shall be maintained intact and enhanced as appropriate
hh 4 42h The City of Redlands shall actively promote the development of the
Live Oak Canyon area in a manner consistent with this section of the Land
Use Element
Ii 4 421 Live Oak Canyon shall be the subject of a specific study to establish
a unified improvement plan to ensure that it will function as a scenic
highway and provide a suitable "front door" for the adjacent canyon
communities
JJ 4 42k The San Timoteo Creek watercourse shall be preserved and
enhanced as the backbone of a linear parkway/activity corridor extending
throughout the canyon
kk 4 421 Special attention shall be given to the sliver of land located
between the San Timoteo Canyon watercourse and the rail line to ensure
the lineal parkway/activity/corridor character of this area is maintained
11 4 42n Development within an area having an average slope of less than
30% or with a proposed density of 1 unit per 10 acres or greater, which
abuts an area of significant natural vegetation shall be separated from
same by a fuel modification zone which contains an all weather access
roadway and a water supply system having fire flow capacity
mm 4 42o Flood control and drainage facilities within the Southeast Area
shall be designed in such a manner as to preserve the perception of
natural watercourses flowing down the on-site canyons and into Live Oak
and San Timoteo canyons
nn 4 42p The City shall determine whether the City's historic agricultural
uses are to be preserved and, if so, shall designate specific sites for
preservation
00 4 42q The perceived character of the vegetation and wildlife within the
Southeast Area shall be preserved and enhanced as appropriate
a
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 7
pp 4 42s Internal access within the area, including roads, trails and paths,
shall be routed so as to preserve and enhance the perception of the
historic access patterns by generally conforming to the natural contours
qq 4 42t All utilities and public facilities in the Southeast Area shall be
designed and constructed to preserve and enhance the perceived natural
and historic character of this area
rr 4 42u Each Planning Sector within the Southeast Area has a series of
signature characteristics, the perception of which shall be preserved The
planning for each Planning Sector shall include special consideration of
the individual character of that Sector and shall include criteria to
preserve and enhance the characteristics identified Each Planning Sector
shall be planned so as to result in an identifiable neighborhood within the
community at large
ss 4 42y The historic character of Live Oak Canyon as a narrow fertile valley
astride a gorged watercourse lined with significant trees should be
preserved and enhanced This character is important to the area and
should be preserved by not only ensuring it does not disappear but by
enhancing it so it can continue to be readily perceived
tt 4 42aa The City of Redlands shall take a strong position to advocate that
the future development of Live Oak Canyon, both within San Bernardino
County and Riverside County, be consistent with the historic character and
role of this canyon
uu 4 42bb The City of Redlands shall take a strong position to advocate that
the future development of San Timoteo Canyon, both within San
Bernardino County and Riverside County, be consistent with the historic
character and role of this canyon
vv 7 10c Enhance the presence of natural and recreational opportunities in
the City and increase park use by selecting new, highly accessible
locations for parks
ww 7 10f Encourage preservation of natural areas within and outside the
Planning Area as regional parks or nature preserves
xx 711a Create and maintain a system of trails serving both recreational
and emergency access needs The system is to accommodate walking,
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 8
hiking, dogging, and equestrian and bicycle use
yy 7 11 c It is the intent of the General Plan Trails Component of the Open
Space and Conservation Element, and the policy of the implementing
agency to work with landowners to develop, acquire, and maintain the trail
system
zz 7 11f Establish agreement with public agencies and private entities for
development and maintenance of trails in rights-of-way and utility
corridors
aaa 7 11 g Encourage creation of a non-profit organization to assist in
developing and managing the trails system
bbb 7 11 h Seek grants and alternative funding mechanisms for trail
development and maintenance
ccc 7 11 i Consider referring projects to the Parks Commission for review and
recommendations of trails
ddd 7 111 Coordinate location of trails to relate to neighboring properties
eee 7 11 k Review new development proposals for compliance with Trails
Master Plan and provide for right-of-way dedication and
improvement/development of trails
fff 7 111 Consider recreational amenities such as rest areas, benches, water
facilities, and trial hitching posts to be incorporated in Master Plan trails
ggg 7 11m Locate trail rights-of-way with concern for safety, privacy,
convenience, preservation of natural vegetation and topography, and work
with landowners on development proposals to incorporate and provide for
continuous multi-use trail system
hhh 7110 Expand street landscape standards to include trail landscape
standards
111 3 1 Oe Preserve the natural appearance of steep hillsides and ridges
Conservation, safety, and fiscal reasons justify preservation, but visual
satisfaction is more widely appreciated
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, '1998
Page 9
A 3 10j Maintain the rural feel of San Timoteo and Live Oak canyons
kkk 3 10t Create overlooks for motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians to stop
and admire the City Retain existing easement and rights-of-way that
further these purposes
III 3 26c Consider adopting additional provisions which enable the Historic
and Scenic Preservation Commission to review permanent changes to the
exterior or setting of designated historic resources, require minimum
maintenance, encourage designation of agricultural and scenic areas, and
establish significant penalties for demolition without a permit
mmm 3 29a Encourage preservation of citrus groves and other agricultural
areas that are designated as having cultural or scenic significance
Encourage retention of existing privately owned citrus groves of all sizes,
especially in historic neighborhoods
nnn 3 29b Identify existing agricultural areas, scenic views, vistas, and
streetscapes, including mountain, canyon, and valley vistas, urban view
corridors, focal points and focal buildings
000 3 29c Define and implement measures to preserve citrus groves, scenic
views, vistas, and streetscapes for the community
ppp 4 62r Identify natural resources within the planning area and adopt
strategies to protect and preserve these resources
qqq 5 50a Establish a comprehensive network of on- and off-roadway bike
routes to encourage the use of bikes for both commute and recreational
trips
rrr 5 50b Seek assistance from major employers in providing support
facilities to encourage use of bikes for commuter purposes
sss 5 50c Develop bike routes that provide access to schools and parks
ttt 5 501 Incorporate bike storage and other support facilities into TDM plans
at employment sites and public facilities, when feasible based upon
distance from bikeways
uuu 5 50o Plan and design bikeways with special consideration given to the
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 10
safety of bicyclists and pedestrians
vvv 5 60a Treat pedestrians as if they are more important than cars
Except on freeways and a few hillside residential streets, pedestrians
should have direct, safe routes to the same destinations
www 5 60b Make walking interesting
xxx 5 60c Provide direct pedestrian routes
yyy 5 60d Provide a safe and healthful pedestrian environment
zzz 5 60e Develop a program to remove all barriers to disabled persons on
arterial and collector streets
aaaa CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, Substantially diminish habitat for fish, wildlife or
plants
3. Traffic
The following exhibits, documents and policies establish thresholds for this category In
evaluating these thresholds the size of property, relationship of the site to surrounding
land uses, and site attributes will be considered
a Trafficway Network (General Pian Figure 5 1)
b 5 20a Maintain LOS C or better as the standard at all intersections
presently at LOS C or better
c 5 20b Within the area identified in GP Figure 5 3, including that
unincorporated County area identified on GP Figure 5 3 as the "donut hole,"
maintain LOS C or better, however, accept a reduced LOS on a case by
case basis upon approval by a four-fifths (415ths) vote of the total
authorized membership of the City Council
d 5 20c Where the current level of service at a location within the City of
Redlands is below the Level of Service (LOS) C standard, no development
project shall be approved that cannot be mitigated so that it does not
reduce the existing level of service at that location except as provided in
Section 5 20b
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 11
e 5 20d Design roadway improvements and evaluate development
proposals based on the LOS standard prescribed in Policies 5 20a, b, and
c 5 20e Monitor traffic service levels and implement Circulation Element
improvements prior to deterioration in levels of service below the stated
standard Development approvals should require demonstration that traffic
improvements necessary to serve the development without violating the
standard will be in place in time to accommodate trips generated by the
project
f 5 20f If monitoring of conditions at intersections within the East Valley
Corridor Specific Plan area and intersections affected by EVC development
indicates that peak hour LOS will drop below the standards set by Policies
5 20a, 5 20b, 5 20c revise the EVC Specific Plan Revisions necessary may
include additional roadway improvements, mandated higher TDM (Travel
Demand Management, See Section 5 40) reductions in single-occupant
vehicle trip share, reduction of intensity of development, or changes in use
of undeveloped sites
g 5 30a Use the Circulation Network to identify, schedule and implement
roadway improvements as development occurs in the future, and as a
standard against which to evaluate future development and roadway
improvement plans
h 5 30d Adopt design standards for each functional roadway classification
Roadway standards illustrated in the Technical Report in the Master
Environmental Assessment Appendix are for typical midblock applications
when constructing new roadways or improving existing roadways where
sufficient right-of-way is available Additional right-of-way may be needed
for turn lanes at some intersection approaches Exceptions to the
standards should be kept to a minimum and should be evaluated on a
case-by-case basis Different standards may govern in Specific Plan areas
1 5 30e Levy appropriate fees on new residential and non-residential
development to be used for roadway improvements in compliance with the
law
5 30f Explore alternative means of financing for road improvements as
long as in compliance with the law
k 5 30g Establish the alignment of San Timoteo Canyon Road in the vicinity
of Barton Road at the common boundary between Redlands and Loma
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 12
Linda so that San Timoteo Canyon Road connects to California Street at
Barton Road
1 5 30h Coordinate with the City of Yucaipa to align the proposed Crafton
Hills Drive between Wabash Avenue and Sand Canyon Road
M 5 301 Establish and maintain traffic circulation patterns that protect the
character of residential neighborhoods
n 5 30j Design major infrastructure improvements to accommodate
regional traffic needs in a manner which discourages increased traffic
flows through residential neighborhoods, encourages traffic flows to
existing freeway systems and assures prudent use of federal and local
taxpayer dollars
0 5 30k In order to assure the circulation policies established by the
Redlands General Plan as set forth in Table 5 2 are implemented, including
without limitation establishment of California Street as a major arterial, the
City Council shall coordinate with SANBAG, the IVDA and the City of San
Bernardino with regard to all Santa Ana river crossings, except the Orange
Street crossing, to assure the development of California Street/Mountain
View Avenue as a major arterial providing access to the San Bernardino
International Airport
p 5 31 a Provide adequate capacity on arterials to meet LOS standards and
to avoid traffic diversion to local streets or freeways
q 5 31 b Locate high traffic-generating uses so that they have direct access
or immediate secondary access to arterials
r 5 31 c Establish a funding system that will enable completion of arterial
roadway improvements before the projects that require them are occupied
S 531d Maximize the carrying capacity of arterials by controlling the
number of intersections and driveways, prohibiting residential access, and
requiring sufficient on-site parking to meet the needs of the project
t 5 32a Design residential collector streets and implement traffic control
measures to keep traffic on collectors at 3,000 vehicles per day or less,
where possible
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 13
u 5 32b Design local residential streets and implement traffic control
measures to keep traffic below 500 vehicles per day
v 5 32c Discourage through-traffic on local streets
w 5 32d Encourage special design standards for local streets in hillside and
rural areas
X 5 32e Avoid adding traffic to streets carrying volumes above the
standards in Policies 5 20a, b, and c and consider traffic control measures
where volumes exceed the standards and perceived nuisance is severe
y 5 32f Design short, discontinuous local streets to discourage use by
through-traffic
z 5 32g Provide for a network of collectors in the northwest and northeast
areas to minimize traffic levels on San Bernardino Avenue, Lugonia
Avenue, Orange and Texas Streets
as 5 32h Adopt design standards for hillside and rural areas
bb 5 40a Ensure that employers implement TDM programs to reduce peak
period trip generation
cc 5 40b Cooperate with public agencies and other jurisdictions to promote
local and regional public transit serving Redlands
dd 5 40c Support the Congestion Management Program for San Bernardino
County
ee 5 40d In accordance with the CMP, develop and implement a
comprehensive trip reduction and TDM ordinance for all employers in
Redlands The goal should be to reduce peak period trip generation by 15
percent from the vehicle trip generation currently observed at similar sites
without a TDM program
ff 5 40e Favor TDM measures that limit vehicle use over those that extend
the commute hour
gg 5 40f Support local feeder bus service to and from current and future
regional transit lines
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 14
hh 5 40g Preserve options for future transit use when designing
improvements to roadways
11 5 40h Work with Omnitrans to plan for local bus routes that are better
able to penetrate neighborhoods to improve service for potential riders
Designate local bus routes in Specific Plan areas
jj 5 401 Future commuter rail services are planned within the Santa Fe rail
corridor, with stops at California Street, Orange Street and Mentone Blvd
Improvements to these streets should be planned for feeder transit
services, and park-and-ride provisions should be made at these locations
Another logical stop would be at University Street to serve the campus at
the University of Redlands Other potential stops could be at Judson Street
and at Crafton Avenue Residents in these areas might use short, trip
commuter rail to downtown Redlands, either to work or shop
kk 5 40j Work with Omnitrans to plan for bus shelters and turnouts
ll 5 40k Incorporate bus shelters and turnouts into design and approvals of
new developments as necessary
mm CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial
in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system
4 Fire and Paramedic Services
The following exhibits, documents and policies establish thresholds for this category In
evaluating these thresholds the size of property, relationship of the site to surrounding
land uses, and site attributes will be considered
a Conceptual Fire Hazard Areas (GP Figure 8 1)
b 8 30a Work to prevent wildland and urban fire, and protect lives, property,
and watershed from fire dangers
C 8 30b Adhere to the requirements for high fire hazard areas designated
by the Redlands Fire Department on the official Roof Classification Zone
Map, updated as of June, 1994, and as specified in the document on file at
the Redlands Fire Department describing High Fire Hazard Area Fire Safety
Modification Zones
d 8 30c Monitor fire-flow capability throughout the Planning Area, and
k
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 15
improve water availability if any locations have flows considered
inadequate for fire protection
e 8 30e Devise alternative fire protection standards suitable for Rural
Living areas not exposed to high wildland fire hazards
f 8 30f Consult the San Bernardino County Fire Safety Overlay Ordinance
(July, 1989 Development Code) for possible appropriate implementation
measures for development in the foothills area
g 8 30g All protects proposed in areas that are at risk from wildfire shall
adhere to requirements under Redlands Fire Department Prevention
Standard "Fire Safety Modification, Zones 1 and 2"
h CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans
I CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, Interfere with emergency response plans or
emergency evacuation plans
5 Police Services
The following exhibits, documents and policies establish thresholds for this category In
evaluating these thresholds the size of property, relationship of the site to surrounding
land uses, and site attributes will be considered
a 98199 Budget, Protect life and property and insure the maintenance of order
b 98199 Budget, Suppress gang and illegal drug activities developing a safe traffic
environment while budding community partnerships to address the causes of
crime and fear as well as other community concerns
C 98/99 Budget, Analyze crime data to define crime trends, series and patterns
and to disseminate this information throughout the department to improve police
services
d 98199 Budget, Enforcement of parking regulations in the downtown business,
historical, and medical districts of the City of Redlands
e 98/99 Budget, Providing community education and major crime investigations
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 16
f 98199 Budget, Arresting those who commit crimes, recover stolen property, and
otherwise bring criminal cases to a conclusion
6 Downtown
The following exhibits, documents and policies establish thresholds for this category In
evaluating these thresholds the size of property, relationship of the site to surrounding
land uses, and site attributes will be considered
a 4 61 a Develop the Specific Plan Area (between Redlands Boulevard and
1-14 Freeway) as an extension of Downtown Redlands, providing a
high-quality pedestrian-oriented development character consistent with
the rest of the Town Center
b SP 45 Policy 1 1 Encourage high-quality office, retail, entertainment and other
related commercial uses
c SP 45 Policy 1 2 Promote land uses that create local employment
opportunities for Redlands residents, stimulate local
economic development and reduce the need for local
residents to commute to fobs outside the city
d SP 45 Policy 1 3 Adopt development standards and design guidelines that
require new development projects to be consistent with the
traditional pattern of downtown development Buildings are
to be located at or near the front property line, with parking
to the rear or side screened from public view
e SP 45 Policy 14 Discourage freeway-oriented land uses, drive-through uses,
and other activities that generate high traffic volume
f SP 45 Policy 1 5 Encourage the use of public transportation and emphasize
pedestrian circulation throughout the downtown area
g 4 61 b Provide opportunities for the expansion and development of small
businesses that provide local services
h SP 45 Policy 2 1 Create a Service Commercial Area that encourages the
development of vacant and under-used properties for
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 17
business development
i SP 45 Policy 2 2 Adopt development standards and design guidelines to
insure high-quality projects that are compatible with
neighboring residential and commercial uses
j SP 45 Policy 2 3 Prohibit large-scale manufacturing and assembly,
warehouse-storage complexes, large-scale service yards
and other land uses that generate significant noise, odor or
truck traffic Locate these activities elsewhere in the city,
outside the downtown area The City and Redevelopment
Agency shall work with existing businesses to locate suitable
sites for expansion and relocation of these activities
k 4 61 c Provide public improvements for traffic circulation, flood control,
utility services and aesthetic amenities that will attract new private
investment and economic development
I SP 45 Policy 3 1 Give first priority to the widening of Eureka Street, between
Pearl Avenue and Redlands Boulevard
m SP 45 Policy 3 2 Improve collector and local streets as new development
occurs
n SP 45 Policy 3 3 Place emphasis on excellence in streetscape design
Provide high quality sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian
lighting and directional signage
o SP 45 Policy 3 4 Complete the Santa Fe Trail shoppers lane
P SP 45 Policy 3 5 Complete pedestrian alley improvements in the 500 block of
Orange Street
q SP 45 Policy 3 6 Build a linear park along the Mission Zana from Church
Street to Ninth Street
r SP 45 Policy 3 7 Develop a public parking structure and pedestrian plaza on
Oriental Avenue, in the Santa Fe Depot District
S SP 45 Policy 3 8 Develop the Santa Fe right-of-way as a pedestrian trail and
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 18
bike path if the railroad vacates the property
t SP 45 Policy 3 9 Make recommended infrastructure improvements to storm
drainage, sanitary sewers and utilities throughout the
Specific Plan area
u SP 45 Policy 3 10 Expand the capacity of the Zanja storm drain by adding a
new structure along the abandoned Southern Pacific railroad
alignment
v 4 61d Preserve historic buildings and sites
w SP 45 Policy 4 1 Emphasize rehabilitation and adaptive reuse of historic
buildings and contributing buildings to the Santa Fe Depot
District, developing new activities that contribute to
downtown economic vitality
x SP 45 Policy 4 2 Encourage adaptive reuse and rehabilitation of historic
houses in the High Avenue area
y SP 45 Policy 4 3 Encourage the preservation of other significant historic
resources that exist throughout the plan area and have
viable uses
7. Residential Desian
The following exhibits, documents and policies establish thresholds for this category In
evaluating these thresholds the size of properly, relationship of the site to surrounding
land uses, and site attributes will be considered
a 4 40a Maintain the predominant single-family residential character of
Redlands
b 4 40b Conserve older neighborhoods because they provide an essential
component of the housing stock and are the primary component of
Redlands' urban character Related policies are in Section 3, City Design
and Preservation, and Section 6, Housing Element Summary Older homes
constitute most of the housing supply affordable by families of moderate or
lower income
c 4 40d Encourage a variety of housing types to serve all economic
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, '1998
Page 19
segments of the community
d 4 40e Increase the variety of lot sizes in North Redlands
e 4 40f Improve density and grading standards designed to preserve the
natural appearance of steep hillsides and ridges
f 4 40g Locate High and Medium-Density development near regional
access routes, employment centers, shopping areas, and public services
g 4 40h Encourage construction of small single-family homes on small lots
as an affordable housing solution
h 4 401 Encourage incorporation of residential units in Downtown
mixed-use projects
This is consistent with the Master Action Plan (1989) and the Downtown
Redlands Specific Plan (Specific Plan No 45) adopted in June, 1994
i 4 40j Plan for continued operation of mobile home parks
Redlands' mobile home parks are a major source of affordable housing and
are generally well-integrated with their residential neighborhoods
j 4 40k Take advantage of the desirable residential environment that can
be provided among citrus groves to preserve agricultural land that
otherwise would be subject to strong development pressures
Grafton exemplifies a prime environment for homes in citrus groves
k 4 401 Consider approval of Medium-Density residential development
proposals at appropriate locations within the East Valley Corridor (EVC)
Special Development District
1 4 40m Establish a range of residential densities and development
standards which encourage a mix of housing types
m 4 40n Protect residential neighborhoods by establishing policies and
standards which discourage incompatible uses
n 4 40o Establish guidelines which will encourage better neighborhood
design
0 4 40p Encourage underground utilities in all new residential
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 20
development
p 4 40q Plan for a housing mix at buildout consisting of 75 percent single
family dwelling units and 25 percent multi-family dwelling units
q 4 40r Consider amending the Zoning Ordinance and East Valley Corridor
Specific Plan to eliminate or modify amortization provision of uses,
particularly residential uses, and to allow reconstruction at the same
density or intensity in the event of destruction by fire or natural disaster
Zoning consistent with the General Plan will create nonconformity
affecting the insurability of some properties unless the Ordinance is
amended The guiding policies of the General Plan do not preclude
maintenance of these uses at their present density or intensity
r 4 40s No land undeveloped as of March 1, 1997 and designated in whole
or in part as "Urban Reserve" or"Urban Reserve (Agricultural)" in the
Redlands General Plan in effect as of June 1, 1987, and/or any land parcel
that was in active agricultural production on November 3, 1986 regardless
of zoning, shall be re-designated or rezoned to permit residential density
greater than the Estate Residential (R-E) classification, as the same
existed on June 1, 1987, in the Redlands City Zoning Ordinance, unless the
following mandatory findings are made and the re-designation or rezoning
is approved by four-fifths (415) vote of the total authorized membership of
the City Council
1 There are substantial and overriding economic or social benefits to
the City and its residents and taxpayers from the proposed density
increase
2 The proposed density increase will not cause adverse environmental
impacts, either individually or cumulatively, directly or indirectly
3 The proposed density increase will not convert viable agricultural land
to non-agricultural uses
4 The proposed density increase will not have a growth-inducing effect
on other property
5 The resulting use will be compatible with uses on adjacent land
6 The proposed density increase will not require substantial expansion
of public infrastructure, facilities or services.
s 4 40t On slopes 15 percent or greater, buildings should be designed to
accommodate the topography and minimize grading
Stepped footings, multiple floor levels, and limited usable outdoor area
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 21
may be essential to maintaining natural appearing hillsides See also
Policy 8 501 in Section 8 50, Seismicity, Geology, and Soils and Policy
3 10e, City Design
8 Cultural Facilities.
The following exhibits, documents and policies establish thresholds for this category In
evaluating these thresholds the size of property, relationship of the site to surrounding
land uses, and site attributes will be considered
a 1010d Advocate human rights and support services in the community for
individuals, families, and homeless people
b 10 10t Develop a transportation network for health, nutritional and
recreational needs
c 1010m Actively pursue and utilize governmental programs which
address human services needs
d 10 20d Develop a plan for partnership with public and private entities to
ensure adequate family support programs and recreational opportunities
which are affordable and accessible
e 10 30a Integrate day care needs for children and frail elderly citizens in
multigenerational settings into the planning processes of the City
f 10 30b Identify and seek sources of funding for child and adult day care
g 10 30c Assist the private sector in the development and coordination of
day care for mildly ill children, handicapped family members, and
dependent adults
h 10 30d Assist the private sector in the development and coordination of
day care facilities which provide services on a 24-hour basis
1 10 30e Facilitate the development and acquisition of space for day care
10 30h Develop plans to ensure that new day care centers are located in
areas of the community where service is not currently or adequately
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 22
provided
k 10.50b Assist the private sector in developing programs to help frail
elderly people and the disabled to receive the types of services that foster
independence and integration into the community
1 10 50c Establish and coordinate community-wide education programs to
the areas of substance abuse, sex education and communicable diseases
m 10 50d Coordinate efforts to expand free clinic services and loaned
personal medical equipment
n 10 50e Support the provision of nutrition services in the City
0 10 50f Establish a plan to retrofit public facilities to make them
accessible to the disabled
9. Park Facilities and Recreational Programs
The following exhibits, documents and policies establish thresholds for this category In
evaluating these thresholds the size of property, relationship of the site to surrounding
land uses, and site attributes will be considered
a 7 10a Create a high quality, diversified park system that enhances
Redlands' unique attributes
b 710b Provide adequate park acreage and recreation facilities
conveniently accessible to all present and future residents
c 710c Enhance the presence of natural and recreational opportunities in
the City and increase park use by selecting new, highly accessible
locations for parks
d 710d Identify the needs of special user groups, such as the disabled and
elderly, and address these in park and recreation facility development
e 7 10e Minimize substitution of private recreation facilities for developer
fee payment or park dedication to ensure that a public park system will be
permanently available to the entire community
f 710f Encourage preservation of natural areas within and outside the
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 23
Planning Area as regional parks or nature preserves
g 7 10g Review park standards periodically to determine whether needs
are being satisfied and how long-term costs will be met
h 710h Continue cooperative efforts with the Redlands Unified School
District through point use agreements for park and recreational facilities
Locate new neighborhood parks in conjunction with elementary or middle
schools wherever feasible
i 7 101 Equitably share the cost of improved park standards between
existing and new residents, businesses, and property owners
710j Provide 5 to 6 acres of neighborhood, community, and city park
area for each 1,000 Planning Area residents This standard excludes
specialized, low use park acreage and includes half of the area of school
sites
k 710k Where suitable land is available at acceptable cost, provide all
residential areas with a neighborhood/community park (8 or more acres
where available)
I 710n Seek any available State and federal grant assistance in
implementing the parks and open space proposals of the General Plan
m 710o Use available techniques to minimize acquisition costs
n 7 10q Continue the dedication of land along the Santa Ana bluff for a
continuous linear park to be used as picnic and scenic area, and trail
0 7 11 r Encourage the development through acquisition and/or dedication
of a linear park along the Zanta and the railroad right-of-way
p 10 40a Maximize the availability of recreational facilities and activities
throughout the City
q 10 40b Evaluate and strive to ensure that all areas of the community
have equal access to recreational facilities and activities
r 10 40c Seek partnerships with schools and private entities to provide
more recreational opportunities for citizens
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 24
s 10 40d Evaluate and consider expanding after-school recreation
programs
t 1040e Require that the recreational needs of children and adults be
addressed in development plans
u CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, Conflict with established recreational,
educational, religious or scientific uses of the area
10. Land Use Compatabilitv
The following exhibits, documents and policies establish thresholds for this category In
evaluating these thresholds the size of property, relationship of the site to surrounding
land uses, and site attributes will be considered
a Conformity with the Land Use Plan (General Plan Figure 4 1)
b 4 40a Maintain the predominant single-family residential character of
Redlands
c 4 40g Locate High and Medium-Density development near regional
access routes, employment centers, shopping areas, and public services
d 4 40n Protect residential neighborhoods by establishing policies and
standards which discourage incompatible uses
e 4 40o Establish guidelines which will encourage better neighborhood
design
f 4 51 c Design neighborhood shopping centers in a manner that will
provide protection to adjacent residential areas
g 4 51 d Locate neighborhood shopping centers near the center of their
respective trade area and at the intersection of major traffic arteries
h 451e Locate neighborhood convenience centers where they will not
result in substantial increases in traffic on local streets serving the
residential areas or create a nuisance due to hours of operation
i 4 51f Neighborhood shopping centers shall remain relatively small and
not expand into a major shopping center and thus disrupt the residential
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 25
character of the neighborhood
451g Neighborhood shopping centers shall be designed in a manner that
will provide protection to adjacent residential areas
k 4 51 h Neighborhood shopping centers shall conform to special
regulations for signage limiting their size, location, and general character
so that they do not disrupt the residential character of the neighborhood
1 4 80c Maintain standards for industrial development and operations that
prohibit creation of noise, odor, or other harmful emmissions
beyond the boundaries of the site
m 11 Ob Seek varied, convenient, high quality office and other commercial
uses appropriate to Redlands to support the projected population
n 11 Oc Adhere to sound development standards to protect the investment
of existing and future commercial and industrial areas
0 11 Od Encourage coordination and balance between economic
development and all other aspects of community life
p 11 Oe Attract business and industry by providing a wide range of urban
amenities and services throughout the City
q 11 Of Establish the appropriate organizational structure for fostering
balanced economic development in the City of Redlands
r 11 Oh Encourage and attract specific types of businesses
s 11 01 Anticipate the demand for commercial and industrial growth and
employ governmental mechanisms to maintain a choice of sites, including
large parcels, as an attraction to mayor employers
t 11 Oj Through cooperation and support, encourage development of a
labor force with skills to meet the needs of the area's businesses and
industries
u 11 Ok Promote redevelopment and rehabilitation of older commercial and
industrial areas to make them more efficient, accessible, aesthetically
appealing, and economically viable
p m
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 26
v CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, Increase substantially the ambient noise levels
for adjoining areas
w CEQA Guidelines, Appendix G, Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of an
established community
11. Schools
The following exhibits, documents and policies establish thresholds for this category In
evaluating these thresholds the size of property, relationship of the site to surrounding
land uses, and site attributes will be considered
a 4 91 a Maintain a continuous exchange of information on school needs
and candidate sites between the City and the School District
b 4 91 b Plan for adjoining school/park sites where both facilities are
needed to serve the same area and space is available
c 491c Locate and design schools as contributors to neighborhood
identity and pride
d 4 91d Schools should be located in a pleasing environment, free from
noise, smoke, dust and traffic
e 491f Consult with Redlands Unified School District when development is
proposed in the vicinity of a potential additional school site designated on
the General Plan
f 4 92a Support activities that enrich the cultural life of both the City and
the University
g 4 92b Encourage development of the campus in ways that both
strengthen its ties to the community and enhance its status as a major
visual focal point
h 4 92c Work with the University to create needed hotel/conference
facilities in Redlands
1 10 60d Support and cooperate with the Redlands Unified School District
and the University of Redlands
Thresholds for Socioeconomic Checklist
December 1, 1998
Page 27
10 60g Expand library services 1n cooperation with the Redlands Unified
School District
k 10 60h Coordinate and assist in the environmental education program
that teaches about recycling, hazardous waste, landfills, anti-littering and
water conservation
1 10 601 Communicate with the Redlands Unified School District to allow
for an open and effective exchange of information
EXHIBIT "B"
COST/BENEFIT
MODEL
li
>J
SFS 171°
} C
I llilii Ii1111 ii111�lil Ilii lliil lilllll l� Ii illli 1111 IIIIIIk illilli11,13 VIII 111111 IJ1d VIII I 1,11.h.1 1 1 I li:I 1.1.1I1i Ili Ili 11111 d Ii11 11 Irl L Illl.ln
SOCIOECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Measure U Workshop
City of Redlands, California
ILId1i J�u.l p11ll 1hil III III I111i 1i 11J1 a1111111iull Mill Luli�Jillel'1.1.IIIb Ililll 1lu.iil�lli 111 1111 I IV 11
Prepared for
City of Redlands
P. 0 Box 3005
35 Cajon Street, Suite 20
Redlands, California 92373
Subnrutted by
David Taussig & Associates, Inc.
1301 Dove Street, Suite 500
Newport Beach, California 92660
(949) 955-1500
September 17, 1998
Tahle of Contents
SECTION PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF FISCAL IMPACT MODEL ES-1
I INTRODUCTION 1
A Background 1
B Scope and Methodolog} 1
C Limitations 2
II. LAND USE DESCRIPTION 5
A Land Uses 5
B Project Valuation 5
C Public Infrastructure - 5
D Land Use and Infrastructure Phasing 5
E Demographics 5
III RECURRING FISCAL IMPACTS CITY OF REDLANDS 7
A Analysis of Recurring Revenues 7
B Analysis of Recurring Costs 9
C Net Recurring Impacts 11
Appendix A Fiscal Impact Model
Appendix B Analysis of City Budget and Methodological Approach
Exhibit A
$ ASSOCIATES INC i
Executive Summar, of Fiscal Impact Model
DTA designed a non-project specific Socioeconomic impact model for various protect land uses
A component of the Socioeconomic impact study is a fiscal impact model DTA has extensive
experience in economic impact analvsis of land development projects DTA staff have prepared
numerous Fiscal Impact Reports("FIRs")estimating the revenue and cost impacts of different land
use decisions on cities, counties and special districts FIRs have been prepared in conjunction with
specific plans environmental impact reports incorporations and annexations reuse studies,general
plan amendments development agreements.and general project proposals.covering different types
of residential commercial/industrial and mixed use projects
Pursuant to the City s direction to include all General Plan land uses DTA developed a generic
impact model The model is intended to satisfv Measure U's requirement to*'determine whether the
benefit of the development mwect to the Citv outweighs anv direct cost to the City that may result
Development impacts can be broadly categorized as one of two types one-time impacts or recurring
impacts One time impacts include the construction cost of public facilities and the City's one-time
costs associated with inspections, plan checks and other administrative procedures as well as the
revenues which are available to pay these costs The Fiscal Impact Model,on the other hand focuses
on ongoing orrecurring fiscal impacts from the development of a Project
Prior to the approval of a proposed project it is essential that the City of Redlands consider the
recurring fiscal impacts of the Project on the City to assure that new development in the Project can
pay for the operations and maintenance services which the City will be providing to its property
owners If the recurring fiscal impact is positive,the new development will be contributing more
to the Citv in revenues than the City is expending on its services If the recurring fiscal impact is
negative the City will be spending more on the proposed project than it will receive in return Under
these circumstances the City might consider mitigation measures including but not limited to Mello-
Roos operations and maintenance special taxes and/or Homeowner's Associations("HOAs")on new
development to mitigate the recurring deficits The City's ability to require mitigation of recurring
operations and maintenance costs has been limited to some extent by the passage of Proposition 218
("the Right to Vote on Taxes" Initiative) in 1996
The cost component of these recurring fiscal impacts include the annual expenses related to the
operations and maintenance of City facilities and services from 1998 through project buildout The
recurring costs included within the fiscal impact model for the City of Redlands are listed below
Recurrine Public Service Costs in Redlands Library Services
• Police Protection General Government Administration
• Fire Protection • Administrative Services/Redev
• Public Works(e g,Road Maint,Parks)
• Community Development
ES
Ciry of Redlands Page 19 1
5ocroeconomic Analvm Measure U Workshop September l7 1998
vim & ASSOCIATES. INC
The fiscal impact model also evaluates the revenues to be generated by proposed projects from 1998
through project buildout The revenues evaluated in the fiscal impact model for the Citv of Redlands
are the following
Recurrine,Revenues in Redlands
Per Capita Revenues
Properry Taxes
• Sales and Use Taxes Transient Occupancv Taxes
• Property Transfer Taxes Franchise Fees
• Business License Revenues Other Licenses/PermttslFines
• Investment Earnings State Revenues
Librat)
Miscellaneous Other Rev
The fiscal impact model employs two methodological approaches in evaluating the cost and revenues
for the City of Redlands The first approach is known as the Per Capita and/or Per Unit Multiplier
Method This method employs City-wide averages, which is a common and straight-forward
approach to modeling fiscal impacts The second approach is known as the Case Study Method—as
it involves analysis of the specific municipal costs and revenues that will be associated with a
project DTA's model incorporates both approaches and is sufficiently flexible fornumerous projects
subject to Measure U requirements
Numerous assumptions have been employed requiring inputs from both the developer and City staff
The developer will be required to provide land use information (e g number of homes, building
square footage for non-residential land uses),proposed assessed values(e g sales prices for homes
or value per square foot for non-residential uses),absorption of land use phased by year three project
buildout,floor-area ratios for non-residential land uses,infrastructure requirements(e g number of
road lane miles to be maintained, number of acres of landscaping/open spacelparks etc.), and
proposed sales revenues per square foot of non-residential land use The City will provide and/or
update the model to adjust to changes to the Level of Service ("LOS") of particular general fund
functions (for example, number of police officers per 1,000 residents) and/or the costs associated
with particular services(e.g..costs per acre for maintenance of parksllandscapmg/open space/roads,
indirect overhead costs,etc ) Because many of the revenues and costs in the model are driven by the
adopted City budget. Citv staff will be required to update the model annually to remain consistent
with the city-wide projection of revenues and costs for the fiscal year
Because a fiscal Impact model requires detailed information related to land use, cern land uses
(namely, General Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendments, aw&4ftvd, are not
suited for evaluation of fiscal impacts to the Citv It is DTA's recommendation that these projects
be exempted from Measure U's requirement to produce a costlbenefit analysis However, most
Specific Plans will be required to produce the requisite information to complete a cost benefit study
through the entitlement process it is DTA's recommendation that all proiects characterized by
sufficient specificity with respect to land use and infrastructure needs be reouired to produce an cost
benefit studv
Crry of Redlands Page ES 2
Socioeconomic Analysis Measure U Workshop September 17, 1998
SIT-Vulull & ASSOCIATES. INC
I Introduction
A Background
This report provides a description of the fiscal impact model prepared for the Cin of
Redlands(the"City")pursuant to Measure U's requirements to determine whether
the benefit of the development project to the City outweighs anN direct cost to the
Citv that may result ' The model is flexible as it includes all General Plan land uses
for the City of Redlands which was incorporated in 1888 and currenth, Includes
66.100 residents According to the Citv's 1998-99 Budget.the Cine s General Fund
earned revenues of$25 887 221, versus expenditures of $28 225 270 for services
for a City-wide revenue to cost ratio of 91 However.a portion of current revenues
exclude other departments interf ind transfers for overhead expenses by the CItN
These interfund transfers have been included in the model to avoid overstating Cin
expenses to the General Fund
B Scone and Methodology
L Scope of Analysis
Fiscal impacts ansing from a land development project can be broadly
categorized as one of two types recurring impacts or one-time impacts Each
of these broad types may, in turn be divided into a revenue component and
a cost component For purposes of this analysis. it has been assumed that
one-time revenues directly offset one-time costs.For example,one-time City
plan check and inspection costs associated with construction of the Project
are assumed to be offset by plan check and inspection fees collected by the
City Similarly,the City has approved a development fee program in order
to fully mitigate the costs of off-site infrastructure to be utilized by residents
and businesses in a proposed development project Consequently,the fiscal
impacts identified in this Fiscal Impact Model ("FIM")focus on ongoing or
recurrinz fiscal impacts from the development of a Project on the City
The scope of this FIM is limited to the fiscal impacts of a Project on the City
itself as opposed to other public agencies which will service the Project but
have access to revenue sources not available to the City
2. Methodological Approach -
The methodology employed in estimating fiscal impacts on the City utilizes
a combination of the Case Study and Per Capita Multiplier methods for
revenue and cost categories The Case Study approach projects fiscal impacts
based on future service demand or revenue potential, determined through
interviews with City staff and based on characteristics unique to the
individual projects Other fiscal impacts have been estimated using the Per
Capita Multiplier method, which assumes that recurring costs or revenues
Page 1
Fiscal Impact Reporr Ctry of Redlands September 16 1998
Sorioeeonomir Analvsis Measure u workshop
1 & ASSOCIATES. INC 1
will result from the future projects at the same rates per person (or per
dwelling unit)as currently prevail within the Cin° Exhibit 1 summarizes the
methodological approach in a schematic diagram
Fiscal impacts on the Cm have been estimated based on an analvsis of the
CiTv s approved budget far fiscal year 1998-99 except where noted otherwise
All fiscal impacts are stated in constant(uninflated) 1998 dollars '
C Limitations
I Accuracy of Information
This FIM analyzes recurring revenues and costs to the City of Redlands from
future developments The model is based on estimates, assumptions and
other information developed from our research, knowledge of fiscal impact
analysis. and interviews with City staff during which we were provided
certain data The sources of information and basis of the estimates are stated
herein While we believe that the sources of information are reliable. David
Taussig & Associates, Inc (DTA) does not express an opinion on the
accuracy of such information The analysis of fiscal impacts contained in the
model is not considered to be a"financial forecast"or a"financial projection
as technically defined by the American Institute on Certified Public
Accountants The word"projection" used alone within this report relates to
broad expectations of future events or market conditions The analysis is
based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to uncertaint}
and variation depending on evolving events Some assumptions inevitably
will not materialize and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur.
therefore the actual results achieved may vary from the projections Further
no effort has been made to determine the possible effect of pending or future
federal, state or local legislation on future projects subject to Measure U
2. Impact of Local Market Conditions on FIM Results
Retail development cannot generate new business or create new buying
power it can only attract customers from existing businesses fulfill an unmet
need, or capture the increase in purchasing power that accrues with
population growth 2 New retail development can redistribute business outlets
and consumer patronage,but generally cannot create new consumers,except
as noted in the discussion of the 'gravity model" below Retail sales must
come from the purchasing power of the existing population or from future
populations or both
Note that departmental budgets have been analyzed and have included the impacts of department specific
revenues Consequently,the General Fund costs analyzed in the fiscal impact model represent the net
unfunded costs borne by the City
Showing Center Handbook, Second Edition Urban Land institute, 1985
Fiscal Impact Reporr Ciry of Redlands page 2
Socioeconomic Analvsts-Measure U Work-shoo September 17 1998
t t & ASSOCIATES, INC I
Consequently, prior to population growth, retail sales may be achieved b\
diverting existing purchasing power from existing merchants to other project
Plan retailers if this is the case a portion of the sales taxes indicated in this
model may not represent net increases in revenue but rather the diversion of
existing revenues At some point in time however new population growth
by itself may have the purchasing power to sustain future retail development
On the other hand retail sales from a future project may represent net
increases to existing sales This would be the case if there currently is retail
sales leakaze in the City to other areas such as San Bernardino Retail sales
leakage isthedifference between total actual and total potential retail
expenditures by area residents within their community trade area Causes for
leakage are many. including availability and variety of merchandise store
quality and price levels, and convenience and access patterns DTA s
nreliminary trade area analvsis indicated that Redlands is exveriencine trade
area leakaee If leakage could be eliminated additional retail space could be
absorbed without affecting existing merchants and therefore existing sales
taxes
Evaluations regarding the structure of retail market areas are based
principally on what is termed the "gravity model"' Essentially,the gravity
model suggests that the relative volume of purchases by consumers at a store
and the frequency of trips (or attraction)to a store. are functions that equate
directly to the size of the store (or shopping center) and inverselv to the
distance (in terms of driving time) between the store and the consumer'
The gravity model predicts the following results
1 New retail centers will serve an expanded trade area (i e., more
people from areas surrounding Redlands will shop at them), and
2 Attraction to the centers from within Redlands will intensify(i.e..the
leakage of retail sales to areas outside Redlands will be reduced)
As the trade area expands and leakage is reduced, the City of Redlands
should experience the same or even a higher level of sales As long as supply
does not outstrip demand affected sales should bounce back quickly to the
same level as before new retail developed within Redlands and should
increase as a result of the expansion of the trade area The net effect in both
instances is that sales volume within the City is increased
The gravitv model describes the advantages of increasing retail density to an
optimal level of supply/demand equilibrium Until the expanded trade area
reaches this point of equilibnum, there should be strong motivation for
' Kenneth Leventhal&Company,Shormine at the Rose City of Oxnard, August 1991
' lbid
Page 3
Fiscal Impuci Report- Ciry of Redlands September 17 1998
Sorioeronomrc Anelvsis Measure U Workshop
I ills & ASSOCIATES. INC I
developers to capitalize on the svneraisttc effects of adding retail space to the
Crtv
Fiscal Impact Report Div of Redlands page 4
Sorioeronomic Analvsis Measure U Workshov September 17 1998
S ASSOCIATES. INC
IL Land Use Description
A. Land Uses
The model incorporates the land uses in the Citv of Redland s General Plan These
land uses include residential (rural laving, very-low-density low-medium-density
medium-density, high density) and non-residential (office commercial
commercial/industrial light industrial public/institutional parks/golf courses
agriculture flood/control and recreational)uses
B Proiect Valuation
Residential home prices are expected to vary depending on the size and location of
each home in a Project similarly,non-residential valuations will vary depending on
type of land use and location Consequently,the oroiect nroxaonent(develover)will
be required to provide the City with proposed sales vnces and valuations for the
project
C Public Infrastructure
Development of future projects may entail/require the construction of roadways
(including curbs, gutters sidewalks and street lights) landscaping
medians/parkways,parks,and traffic lights,and may include natural open space and
street lights
Because each project wall have unique infrastructure needs, the model treats the
actual infrastructure requirements as a variable input to be arovided by the developer
(consistent with the City's requirements)
Because enterprise funds by definition operate on a cost recovery basis, the model
assumes that the costs of providing water and sewer service will have no impact on
the City's General Fund
D Land Use and Infrastructure Phasing
While most infrastructure facilities are related to site improvements required prior
to actual construction of structures,all infrastructure phasing is based on the rate of
absorption of the development Since the FIR focuses on recurring costs and
revenues,this phasing assumption may not be consistent with the actual dedication
of the improvements to the City and therefore may over/(under)state costs Note that
the model allows for overriding the assumptions via manual input
E Demo ranhics
A 'Project's detached dwelling units are projected to generate a total population at
buildout This projection is based on the current population(the City-wide average
of 2 737 persons per household identified by the California Department of Finance
Fiscal impact Report- City of Redlands Page 5
Sonaeronomar Analysts Measure U Workshop September 17 1995
ASSOCIATES. INC I
as of Januar} 1 1998 ) These demographic assumptions affect the fiscal impact
model as all of the recurring costs and revenue projections which are based on
analvses of per capita data are dependent on population estimates (see Tables 1 to
Appendix A and the three tables in Appendix B)
Non-residential land uses also use a multiplier approach based on an 'equivalent
dwelling unit" {EDU} concept Based on the non-residential build out land use
acreages and Floor Area Ratios as disclosed in the Redlands General Plan and the
assumption that a typical home in Redlands consists of approximately 1900 square
feet a non-residential acre is treated as equivalent to 9 0 dwelling units for purposes
of revenue/cost multipliers
Fiscal Impact Repan- Ciry of Redlands Page 6
Sorioeronomir Analysis-Measure U Workshop September 17 1998
cS ASSOCIATES. INC
III Recurring Fiscal Impacts. Cm) of Redlands
This section identifies each of the recurring revenue and cost impacts to the Citv General Fund
arising from development of the future Project It also discusses the methodology used in projecting
these impacts Detailed numerical analvsis of the impacts discussed below are contained in Tables
1 through 9 in Appendix A
A Analvsis of Recurring Revenues
1 Property Taxes
(a) Secured Roll
The County Auditor-Controller identifies property tax rates as a percentage
of total assessed valuation by Tax Rate Area ("TRA") and AB S
apportionment factors These apportionment factors must then be reduced
slightly to account for the state-mandated property tax shift to the Educational
Revenue Augmentation Find("ERAF") The model conservatively assumes
that property tax losses to the ERAF will continue in the future For
flexibility the model assumes that the city-wide average of 20%of the 1%
Proposition 13 ad valorem tax rate is passed thru to the City of Redlands
Note that all valuation assumptions are variable inputs necessitating input
from the developer
(b) Property Taxes -Unsecured Roll
Unsecured property taxes are levied on tangible personal property that is not
secured by real estate Examples of unsecured property include trade fixtures
(e g manufacturing equipment and computers),as well as airplanes boats
and mobile homes on leased land Tax rates for unsecured property in a
given fiscal year are the same as tax rates for secured property in the
preceding fiscal year
Unsecured property values are assumed in the FTM to average 2 75 percent
of secured value for residential land uses and 10 percent for non-residential
land uses
2 Indirect and Direct Sides Taxes
The fiscal impact model has also quantified indirect sales tax revenues
created from purchases by project residents from businesses located within
the City The sales tax dollar capture rate for residential development in a
typical city with balanced residential and commercial uses is generally 50%
or greater The model conservatively assumes an average household income
(based on a home price-to-income ratio of four-to-one), a 25% taxable
expenditure rate and a 50% City capture rate
Fiscal impact Report- Ctty of Redlands Page 7
5ortoerononur Analvsts Measure U Workshov September 17 1998
. ASSOCIATES. INC
In addition to sales tax revenues indirectly generated bN residential
development certain non-residential uses will produce additional direct sales
tax revenues Sales tax Qeneration for non-residential land uses must be
provided by the developer based on the actual type of commercial land use
For illustrative purposes. DTA examined the sales performance for a
neighborhood shopping center which contains a broad mix of retailers
DTA-s figures are based on studies conducted and published b-, the Urban
Land Institute (the "ULI") in its publication entitled Dollars & Cents of
Shopping Centers 1997 The median taxable sales performance figure for
a neighborhood shopping center in the West is$212 per square foot per vear
(DTA has seen annual sales per square foot range from $140 to $200+ for
shopping centers in Southern California On the higher end power centers '
can achieve annual sales of $275+ per square foot ) Non-retail
establishments also generate some sales tax revenue. as well as significant
California use tax revenue from property purchased outside the state Based
on previous studies in Southern California.DTA has found taxable sales to
range from $10 to $25 per square foot for industrial space. office and
warehouse land uses As another example,the City of Irvine-s fiscal model
projects sales per square foot of$19 for business parks These amounts are
presented to the City as guidelines for evaluating developer's assumptions
regarding taxable sales
Sales taxes to the City are projected at one percent of retail sales
3 Propertv Transfer Tax
The property transfer tax applies to all sales of real property,and is shared by
both the City and the County at a rate of$0.55 per$1.000 of sale or resale
value, excluding assumed liens or encumbrances
This FIM utilizes annual residential turnover rates of 10 percent for
residential properties (which is slightly below the State average of one sale
every seven years) and one percent for non-residential properties
4 Business License Taxes
The City business license taxis a sales based tax The standard taxis$12.00
per establishment,for the first$5,000 in gross sales plus an additional$3 for
each additional $5.000 increment in gross sales Gross sales are assumed-to
be comparable to the proposed sales projections used for sales tax estimates
5. Franchise Fees
Franchise fees are levied on privately-owned firms providing utilities and
other services to City residents and businesses, based on the gross revenues
generated by these services Franchise fees accruing to the City from the
Project have been estimated based input from the City Finance Department
Fiscal Impact Report Ciry of Redlands Page 8
Sorioero►iamtr Analvsts Measure U Workshop Seorember 17 1998
8ASSOCIATES INC. 1.
and the purvevors of these services(cable,gas.electricity) The model alloy-s
for adjustments to the assumptions
6 Transient Occupancy Taxes
The model also includes a section addressing transient occupancN taxes in the
event that a project proposes a hotel/motel land use The devefouer will be
reouired to provide information on the tiroaosed average billing rate vacanc%
rate and number of rooms,
7. Revenues from Other Agencies (Motor Vehicle In-lieu Taxes)
Motor vehicle license fees or in-lieu taxes are collected annually by the State
Department of Motor Vehicles at the time a vehicle is registered These
revenues are distributed to cities and counties largely on the basis of
population The model estimates these revenues by multiplying the City s
current $40.39 per capita factor by the projected Project population Note
that these revenues are beine reduced in future vears thru the state
anmopriation process
8. Other Revenues
Other revenues include fees collected by various City agencies including
Community Development Services(e g,planning,building and safety,code
enforcement), Community Services and Public Works, as well as licensing
fees, fines and penalties, and miscellaneous revenue sources listed in
Appendix B As mentioned previously,the Indirect Costs for administration
and overhead currently supported by development fees, special financing
districts which will ultimately be phased out,and other"temporary" sources
of revenue which are dependent on new development were all eliminated as
potential sources of income to the City from the Project In addition, some
of these revenues have been "netted" out from the costs of specific
departments For these departments,a net cost approach is being employed
9 Investment Earnings
Investment earnings have been projected for the City using the Case Study
method A conservative annual effective reinvestment rate of 2 5%has been
employed in the revenue analysis
B. Analvsis of Recurring Costs
I. Police Protection Costs
Police services are provided by the City Police Department Development of
future projects is expected to increase demand for police services by
increasing the number of calls for assistance,thereby necessitating the hiring
of a portion of an additional officer Based on discussions with the City, it
was determined that the Case Study method would most accurately reflect the
Fiscal Impact Report Gry of Redlands Page 9
Sorioeconomic Analyses Measure U Workshop September 17 1998
s & ASSOCIATES. INC.
was determined that the Case Studv method would most accurately reflect the
level of police service required for the Project In 1998-99 the CitN
expended $73.008 per officer on police services (including benefits)
For residential land uses the Police Department indicates a 1 3 Officer per
1 000 residents is appropriate
Far non-residential land uses the department recommends a rate of$1.069 per
retail acre
2 Fire Protection Costs
The Redlands Fire Department states that fire service costs vary by densitm•
For residential land uses the department recommended a factor of$225 per
acre for low density residential land uses,$451 per acre for medium densit},
and$901 per acre for high density land uses
For non-residential land uses, a factor of$535 per acre is being employed
3 Public Works
Infrastructure costs are based on the current levels of service as provided by the
Redlands Public Works Department These costs are based on the
following factors $5,000 per lane mile for road pavement maintenance, $9
per curb mile for street maintenance, $5,560 for traffic signal maintenance
per intersection, $12,500 per acre for landscape maintenance, $7,000 per
acre for park maintenance, $125 per light for street lights, $125 per acre for
open/space maintenance, and$500 per lineal mile for trail maintenance In
addition, an overhead factor has been added for public works of 13 50
percent Note that the developer will be required to provide the amounts
of infrastructure (e a number of lane miles of roads number of acres of
narks number of street lielits etc ) that will be vublicly maintained
4. City General Government and Overhead Costs
General government costs include program or departmental costs associated
with the City Council City Manager,City Clerk,City Finance Director,City
Treasurer, City Attorney, and other overhead costs (see Table A-6). The
initial costs of establishing these services are generally greater than the
incremental costs involved in expanding these services,due to economies Qf
scale (e.g.,as a City grows larger, its costs associated with the city attorney,
city manager, city administrative facilities,city council expenses,etc do not
grow as quickly as its population). DTA analyzed the City's 1998-99 budget
to calculate the ratio between general government and net overhead costs to
direct City costs(after deducting department specific revenues) As a result,
DTA assumed the Project would incur additional general government and
overhead costs in proportion to one-half the ratio of current overhead as a
Fiscal Impact Repan- Cuv of Redlands Page 10
Socioeconomic Analvsis-Measure U Workshop Seatember 17 1998
& ASSOCIATES INC 1
percentaee of direct costs.or 14 87 percent of direct Project costs(See Tab!L
6)
5 Police-Human Services Costs
The Cin also provides various services related to part, and recreation
services.housing,volunteer services.emergency preparedness neighborhood
services etc The 1998-99 Per Capita Multiplier is $11 04
6 Community Development Costs
This department is responsible for ensunng that proposed development
within the City conforms to all applicable laws and regulations embodied in
the state and local codes The Per Capita Multiplier represents the unfunded
portion of departmental costs (net of fees and various permit revenues)
According to the 1998-99 City budget the per capita cost was$179
7. Library Costs
Library services are provided by the Redlands Library Department The
fiscal impact model assumes that the costs of providing these services are
$14 16 per capita on the City's General Fund
C. Net RecurringImnacts
Based on the assumptions in the model and the inputs provided by the developer and
the City,the net fiscal impact of individual projects can be detern fined Note that in
Qeneral non-residential Droiects will be positive whereas residential proiects will be
sliehtly neeative However individual circumstances can vary derendul on
numerous factors Therefore,the model should be treated as an analytical toof that
attempts to estimate the cost-benefits of a project to the City of Redlands
K 1CL1ENTS2IREDLANDS1F1R1fir doc
Fiscal Impact Repon-Ctry of Redlands Page 11
scrioeronomic Analvsis Measure U Workshop September 17 1998
Appendix A
Fiscal, Impact Madel
.,vu U L PD np u.D
D
oo0ano 0o nGOPP o.po 88888$3$ oop00ooeoo DP0000P qqo nPPpPoOD�o ao Po o o a POP oo OogoPODo
doada o ddddddodao .Da.....Go dopeadan $$
i
y O p p qy O,O n 0 0 P a p O p p P q P O P O O n n 0 oP O O P D p O n d 8 P O p O D P 0 0 0 0 0
P O p O O P u n o o O O P a d 0 dp
TY. a d O p O O G O O d d O p o d O p 4 d n d dn O O dO
D tl o p G 0 P O D O p G P O P 0 a O p P a O O D P O G O p P 6 0 p p P O O n O tl p n p n n P 0 D O g n D p O q P n c ■
�q 3 a$od. dodd d Odd Od edd04edddc coadoddod lfi $ iii
6 1 P O G G P pn tl 6 $d$tl$a8o$d�8d d0n O O n p nn n D o 0 0 p
O n tl O O O O Q O O P O O O O o p Cp
doeadda6 do0onodoaDddad
i _ N
P p P o p n 0 0 p P n 0 O 4 7 n O a n O D P O. O n P O tl P p O n n 0 t
d
.ado d
n6doOddddd OodddOridtld dddoda d Od -
o.PPDP oo Ptl Do o. p OP600o00gp o
$8$88 $ g.opogotl ogpPOP.O 0 opP000O000 0oovapPaoy
oeooao dddddd6ddd oOoddDdd�o d6ddcaon�d as yy{■ rT
ry n Uy i Z
+gg p0Pn0 on 00000000 xsss8 8 oopDD0000p 0onop000�o o0o0Pp0o�. pn o p Da o pno POa o o ogono +
p 0 ndddd n dddddd d o de dood6doo 0 aodtl0dod o
q DDopPP OP OopPPnpp pOppooO oo .. o pq 0 o.o o Pp qO o.o o.o Popo pPo00DOpo0
]yTT[tii $88x $ 0...dddddd ddpoadda�c dgodddaacid
0oa8a
8
�+� ooDDgpop opDpDaoo 8$888
doo00 0 .d o d a P
S oPopgDpogP aopogoop Dgpnonopq aopogoopgo 0000tlpDOPc
� ddddaddddd adr�o doodocoo
y O.P p D 0 P O p P O p O G g 0 O o n o P P 0yO n o n O O P O p 0 n p g p O O p O O P 0 n o
d G d 0 do d.d d d o 0 o 0.p 4 o o O O d O d g o n a*..
d 0 E RO O d
tr o a 1r�pe
s } � a aka iaqYU¢ S
7. G F D yl U O S.y yyp1�17y1 V W Q F� j[w 1►/� 2`Y w� a�22�t Q w S p i o
V�WW}S} �o �.� w vW M� 025 W w {y7] N Y ❑� O_N y p7 O¢ N cW hn
v� U
wrc
~�~zW� y ¢ fe O
4Ta W ozo� a uu o l3ry i r3' o� U o V 3
y1 yj F p r Goc=-V Gaf l7� r ¢ u Jay
Jn W r Ot
$8 aaaaW a j oM S U J C.
z u_8 j vu� I- 11Ju u ¢u'��y{
< Z` QS ¢ Ow Q JwC E Q J w 2.1 j W11[97�1 -u ` ��c33ie�s� � '?��aJ V 6VAA `a� t � �.L�j
F- Jir 3 c¢i��2 ru i¢»J7 rlf.�7 ¢»..•3 unuu7an<LL5zUuu-natW""' �uu7a�� uu� a«u.
2522393 222235ss2s 2 ss35sS3 Assusas393 2 SSS 3912 2
7 F
� � ;�� 3,2281293 123353333x3 S SS31212aS 1293123221252 3 SSS SSS 3
°
r— —� ��,xo saAaass 22ssssASas 5 2s3AAas 3252222222 s 322 Sea s
if 21223925 212222,23822 S 33123292 S9322222212 9 395 393 S
LR 2222292 12123221233912 S 122sssas A,2Sssuss9S 2 SSS 333 A
R iG
2522232 3s93AA322s S 9332299 222322saaa 2 S95 393 3
3ssaaaa 2333223528 s 2352393 12322222232 S ass SSs S
�1 x r
o _
W
s
if
asassa3 sassussSxs S 233,2292 2233233393 2 293 ass S
r
III 3222293 3233322392 ,2 3359293 53322325a2 2 Ass ass 3
_ o
3 2353292 AsSssassas 2 5s,2912a12 2232322292 S Sas 395 3
225932 888888868 �
A33SasA9
w
04
•w Y ss3y'o� NvO� ya� 20"�'Yo1
y710 .21
°N (`oNr � Nwri 9it; ra i $
1ZI2
H 6 p aQ 4Q pM
aW
IAUIE3
(-ITI OF REDLANDS r
CAST-STUDY:SAI.ES I AXES AND PR(IPFRTI TRANSFER TAXES
FIS(Al IAIPA(."f ANAI ISIS CCC!!!
RESIDENTIAL INDIRECT SALES TAX GENERATION ASSUMPTIONS BUSINESS DIRECT SALES d USE TAX GENERATION ASSUMPTIONS PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX ASSUMPTIONS
AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD INCOME ASSUMPTIONS SALES TAXES PASSED THROUGH TO CITY APPLIED TO COSTS 11 100% RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TURNOVER RATE 1000%
MEASURE 7 TAXES PASSED THROUGH TO TRANSIT AUTHORITY 000% BUS 6 COM PROPERTY TURNOVER RATE 10076
WEIGHTED AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL PRICE $0 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SALES TAXES 000% TRANSFER TAX AS A% RESALE DOLLAR p 917E
AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE(20%DOWN) $0 PROJECT RETAIL TAXABLE SALES PER SO FT PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX PASSED THROUGH TO CITY 50 OOX
ANNUAL MORTGAGE PAYMENTS 0 8.91%E 10 YEARS $0 OFFICE $0.00
AVG HOUSEHOLD INCOME(a 1 INCOMEIPAYMENT RATIO) SO COMMERCIAL $0.00
RETAIL TAXABLE EXPENDITURE(%OF INCOME) 25.0% COMMERCIALANDUSTRIAL $000
PROJECT RESIDENTS PURCHASES OUTSIDE PROJECT 500% LIGHT INOUSTRIAL $000
AND WITHIN INCORPORATED CITY- PUBLICANSTITUTIONAL $0 DD
PARKS/GOLF COURSES $000
AGRICULTURE $0 DO
FLOOD CONTROUCONSTRUCTION AGGREGATES $000
RECREATIONAL $0.00
1 Based on amount passed Ihlough to MY in the adoPled 1997.98 Oudgel
YEAR I YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR S YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 6 YEAR 4 YEAR 10
FISCAL YEAR IS$X1.000) and W 1946 1699 7644 2001 2002 2007 2001 2005 2004 2007
SALES 6 USE TAX REVENUE CALCULATION(CUMULATIVE)'
WD1RFf7,Al FC IAV . NFRATION
RESIDENTIAL TAXABLE EXPENDITURES 30 30 30 $0 30 $0 $0 so 30 so
TOTAL TAXABLE PURCHASES WITHIN COUNTY 30 $0 $0 so So $0 SO SO $0 $0
RESIDENTIAL SALES TAX GENERATION 30 $0 $0 $0 30 $0 $0 SO 30 30
D)8P x- 1 F FNFRATIOfi
OFFICE TAXABLE SALES $0 30 $0 $0 SO $0 $D 30 $0 $D
COMMERCIAL TAXABLE SALES $0 $0 $0 $O 30 $0 $0 $0 $0 $D
COMMERCIALANDUSTRIAL TAXABLE SALES 30 $0 $0 $D $0 $D 30 $0 $0 $0
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TAXABLE SALES $0 $D $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PUBLICANSTITUTIONAL TAXABLE SALES $D $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PARKSIGOLF COURSES TAXABLE SALES $0 $0 30 $0 $0 $0 $O $0 $0 30
AGRICULTURE TAXABLE SALES $0 $0 SD $0 $0 $0 $O $0 $D $0
FLOOD CONTROLICONSTRUC71ON AGGREGATES TAXABLE SALES $0 $0 S0 $0 $0 $0 to $o $0 $0
RECREATIONAL T&MI.F SAI FC 19 so so 19 =Q 119 10 $11 $Q so
TOTAL DIRECT TAXABLE SALES $0 $0 SO $0 $0 30 $o SD $0 $0
TOTAL DIRECT SALES TAX GENERATION $0 $0 30 $0 30 30 $o 30 30 $o
70TAL PROJECT SALES A USE TAX REVENUES APPLIED TO COSTS 30 $4 $0 $D 39 $0 $o 30 $0 30
RESIDENTIAL MEASURE 1 SALES TAXES SD $0 $0 $0 $0 $O $0 30 $0 $0
NONRESIDENTIAL MEASUR£'T SALES TAXES 3D $0 30 $0 SD 30 $0 $D $0 30
RESIDENTIAL LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SALES TAXES $0 30 30 $0 $0 $D $0 $0 $0 $0
NON RESIDENTIAL LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SALES TAXES $0 $0 $0 30 $0 $D 30 30 $0 30
TOTAL PROJECT SALES&USE TAX REVENUES FORj"NSfP RTAT" ;p $o $0 �<0 $0 so 30 ;p
PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX CALCULATION(CUMULATIVE):
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAXES $0 $0 $0 $0 $D 30 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TRANSFER T AXES H SQ SQ 19 so SQ $Q to SQ to
TOTAL ANNUAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAXES 30 $D $D_ SO $p $0 $0 30 $0
SHADED CELLS ARE VARIABLE ASSUMPTIONS OR INPUTS UNIQUE TO THE PROJECT
TABLE 4 f m
CITY OF REDLANDS
BUSINESS LICENSE FRANCAISE FEE T.O T REVENUES
FISCAL.IAIYACT ANALYSIS
BUSINESS LICENSE FEE REVENUE CABLE FRANCHISE FEES ELECTRICITY FRANCHISE FEES
RESIDENTIAL NA AVERAGE YEARLY BILLING AMOUNT PER DU 11 50 Lt AVERAGE YEARLY BILLING AMOUNT PER DU l7 SO.dO
PENETRATION RAPE TI7D Do-. %PASSED THROUGH TO CITY I1 I 1.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL %PASSED THROUGH TO CITY 11 5170% TYPICAL ELECTRICITY FRANCHISE FEE PER DU TO CITY $000
BUSINESS LICENSE FEES ARE CHARGED AT A RATE EOUAL TYPICAL CABLE FRANCHISE FEE PER OU TO CE $000
TO$12 FOR THE FIRST 15.000 IN GROSS SALES PLUS 53 I Based on eensueant's•rpenence
FOR EACH ADDITIONAL$5,000 INCREMENT IN GROSS SALES 1 Based on caneua►nl's aspenence
GAS FRANCHISE FEES TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX 71
AVERAGE YEARLY B011NG AMOUNT PER DU ll lO.W I NUMBER OF AVAILABLE ROTE[ROOMS 0
%PASSED THROUGH TO CITY 11 1.00% OCCUPANCY RATE 0.00%
TYPICAL GAS FRANCHISE FEE PER DU TO CITY 10.00 AVERAGE BILLING RATE PER ROOM $0.00
%PASSED THROUGH TO CITY I 1 G,00%
I Based on consusaM's egsa"w-* AVERAGE YEARLY OCCUPANCY REVENUES TO CITY 5000
1 Based on Consulant's o"nence
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 7 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR? YEAR I YEAR 9 YEAR 10
FISCAL YEAR Its e1.000) end of 1999 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2001 INS 2006 2007
BUSINESS LICENSE FEE REVENUE
RESIDER71AL
RURALLIVING NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA HA
VERY-LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
LOWMEDIUM.DENSITV RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL HA NA NA NA NA HA NA NA NA NA
"GH DFNSITY REftD NT81 NA NA 96 H& NA ISA N6 d6 K& NA
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
NON-RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE s0 $0 50 50 i0 s0 s0 so 50 50
COMMERCIAL 50 S9 s0 so 10 50 10 SO 50 50
COMMERCIALONDUSTRIAL $0 50 50 so 10 so 70 $0 s0 10
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL s0 50 SG So so s0 50 s0 s0 s0
PUSUCRNSTITLITIONAL 10 50 50 s0 so so 30 so s0 50
PARKSMOLF COURSES SG 50 so So so s0 10 50 50 So
AGRICULTURE s0 SO SG so S0 SG 50 so 50 10
FLOOD CONTROUCONSTRUCTIONAGGREGATES so 50 f0 SD So 10 so 50 50 SD
HFD3A3 QUA+ i0 so tR IC to S9 39 S9 i0 iA
TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL s0 s0 s0 to 50 so S0 10 s0 s0
TOTAL,BUSINESS LICENSE FEE REVENUE so s0 so so 10 so SG 10 so so
FRANCHISE FEE REVENUE
RESIDENTIAL CABLE FRANCHISE FEES 10 s0 so so SG $41 so s0 S0 10
NONRESIDENTIAL CABLE FRANCFOSE FEES s0 50 s0 SO so so 10 s0 so 10
RESIDENTIAL GAS FRANCHISE FEES s0 s0 s0 so 50 10 30 s0 50 so
HON-RESIDENTIAL GAS FRANCHISE FEES s0 $0 S9 SO s0 s0 50 s0 S0 10
RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY FRANCFISE FEES so $0 so s0 so so s0 so so S0
NON-REStIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY FRANCHISE FEES S0 50 so 50 so 10 s0 s0 s0 s0
TOTAL FRANCHISE FEE REVENUE 10 so to so s0 s0 10 10 s0 s0
TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE
TOTAL TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE s0 SO so s0 LTO — So ^_s0 _So — so so
10
SHADED CELLS ARE VARIABLE ASSUMPTIONS OR INPUTS LR40UE TO THE PROJECT
TAMLL',
CITY
17Y VF RE:DLANDS
OTHER REVENUE.AND REVENUE SUMMARY
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
OTHER GENERAL REVENUES IPER CAPITA UETHOD)11 POCOM E FROMA INVESTMENTS
OTHER LICENSES PERMITS t FINES 50.00 EFFEC ME INTEREST I
STATE REVENUES "a39
FEDERAL REVENUES NA
CITY ATTORNEY s0.0o
ENGINEERING SERVICES so•00
FIRE DEPARTMENT 50.00
JO5LYN CENTER $0.00
LIBRARY 30.D0
PARKS so'00
PLANNING so'00
POLICE Sabo
POLICE-ANIMAL CONTROL 50.00
RECREATION NA
INTERFUND CHARGES 20.00
INVESTMENT INCOME NA
RENTAL INCOME NA
DONATIONSfCONTRIBEfI[ONS NA
diFmREVENUES m
SUBTOTAL OTHER REVENUES PER CAPITA. 540.99
1 SM Apqutaf lot c&bmA orl oI 11+r caM IIs11PMUti For sola 4s1I0M rorus,a Roi 00/i Ireflnaus»f/rlp d
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 MR 7 YEAR 4 YEAR 6 YEAR s YEAR? YEAR s YEAR s YEAR 10-
FISCAL YEAR is$■1.006) orl0 0l is" 1299 2DOo 2007 7002 7007 2001 2005 2106 9007
PER CAPITA REVEIIIES
RESIDENTIAL s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 so s0 SO s0 so
NON-RESIDENTIAL 30 so so so 20 sp i0 w sQ 30
TOTAL OTHER LICENSES PERMITS i FINES s0 s0 so s0 s0 s0 s0 90 so SO
SIA REVENUESso
RESIDENTIAL so so so so s0 s0 so so so
unu.raE_ctnc_NTIu so ID s0 SO 20 i0 io so so so
TOTAL STATE REVENUES s0 SO s0 s0 so s0 io so so so
FEDDFR►t RrVFN IES
RESIDENTIAL s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 so s0 s0 s0 so
unN.a�cincuxuu s0 SO s0 so So to ID sQ sa so
TOTAL FEDERAL REVENUES so 50 s0 s0 s0 s0 so s0 so so
PRY aTTDRNEY
RESIDENTIAL s0 s0 s0 so s0 s0 s0 s0 SO so
fou DFN7u1 SQ s4 s0 s0 f0 sQ s0 is s0 30
TOTAL CITY ATTORNEY so s0 s0 s0 so so s0 s0 so s0
ENGa1NE£H1HG E=cE5
RESIDENTIAL so s0 so so s0 so so so so u
uaumR SIDENTNIt so 30 s0 to i° s0 s0 i0 i0 sL
TOTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES s0 so s0 so s0 s0 so SO s0 3[
EIRE DEPARTIAENT
RESIDENTIAL s0 40 s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 so u
HUN.aESMI NTIu SD 10 s0 30 s0 s0 s0 s0 so z<
TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT s0 IO s0 so so s0 s0 s0 s0 sl
100 YN CENTER
RESIDENTIAL so so SO so s0 so so so so s'
unN.ar cmcNilu s0 10 s0 SO s0 s0 sQ s0 s0 i
TOTAL JOSLYN CENTER S8 so so s0 so so so so so s
LMEARY
RESIDENTIAL to so so so so so so so to s
NnN.RFC=TLAL $I SO SQ 3D s0 ID SD 10 s0 s
TOTAL LIBRARY s0 s0 s0 s0 so s0 so s0 so s
PARKS
RESIDENTIAL s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 I
NDN•RESIDENTIAL III s0 so SD so s0 io so w I
TOTAL PARIS s0 s0 SO so s0 so so s0 so I
MANNING
RESIDENTIAL s0 s0 so s0 so s0 so s0 s0 I
51) 70 s0 so so $a s0 s0 s0
TOTAL PLANNING IO so so s0 i0 SO So SO so
YEAR I YEAR 2 YEAR 7 YEAR 4 YEAR s YEAR s YEAR 7 YEAR I YEAR f YEAR IL
FISCAL YEAR +is X5.000, TN! Is" 2004 201 3m 2= 2= lops 2006 2w,
OPER CAPITA REYEMIES
Pf]1.1GE so so to so so so so so so s
RESIDENTIAL
NON BLUDFNTUIL i0 ig SD SD SD s0 s0 ID so I
TOTAL. POLICE so s0 S4 so S4 so so so so S.
pourp
RESIDENTIAL so so so SD so so so so SC s
PION-B€SIOENTI& SD SD so so SD 3D ID SD SD I
TOTAL pOUCE•AmiMAL CONTROL so $0 s4 so So to so S0 so s4
RECREATION f0 Sp SO so
RESIDENTIAL so so so so so so SD ID SD i4
�-gFgmEbalb1 ID SD u SD SD
TOTAL RECREATION so SD so SD So to $o SD so to
1[9-
FRESU ru_ ARGE$ SO
RESIDENTIAL Sp f0 SO So 3p SO 3D SD So
NON.RFSIIIFNTIAL SD so s{1 u IQ SD ID 1D sD Io
TOTAL INTERFUND CHARGES so s0 so so s4 so s4 iD so so
INVESTMENT INCOMEsD so so so So so
RESIDENTFAL ID SO sfl so
NINJ.RFS11iFNT1AL to so � � so �
TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME so so S4 ip s0 30 to s0 $p SD
RENTAL INC061E
RESIDENTIAL SD so so s4 so so to s0 s0 S4
NON-RFSI�ENTIAL 5D 10 so ID III IQ ID to &D u
TOTAL RENTAL INCOME s0 so so s4 so so so so so so
ODNATIQHmrnNTBIRUjION
RESIDENTIAL so so so so so s0 so so s4 s4
uHaU RFSMEHIMAL ZD so so so ZD so ID to ID ID
TOTAL DONATIONSICONTRIBUTIONS 40 so s4 so So to so to so so
mhEB.Es0 s0 iD s0 s0 s8 W s0 s0 SO
RESIDENTIAL
ulau-mmulmSD 14 ID s0 w 10 sD so 10 ID
TOTAL OTHER REVENUES u so So SD s0 So Sp so SD so
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PER CAPITA REVENUES so so so so So so so so so s4
SD i0 s0 s0 iD 30 SD to Sfl SO
TOTAL PER CAPITA REVENUES So so so so SD so so so so so
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL CASE STUDY REVENUES to s0 s0 so s0 s0 so SD s0 s0
CF STF LAY RF I$ ID SD ID 3D IQ so 3D ID ID ID
TOTAL CASE STUDY REVENUES u so SD so so s0 so s0 so $0
RESIDENTLAL REV AVAILABLE FOR INV INCOME s0 so so so So So so so so so
SD s0 SD ID s0 3D sD sD so s0
TOTAL REVENUES AVAILABLE FOR tNVESTMENT INCOME to so so so S0 to so so so so
RESIDENTIAL INVESTMENT INCOME to so so so s0 s0 so so SD to
SD s0 ID s0 to 10 81 SD ID SD
TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME SD so so so to so SD s4 so so
SHADED CELLS ARE VARIABLE ASSUMPTKMS OR WPLITS UNIQUE TO THE PROJECT
rL—
=r----4 y i a r
01 r » C E7
2I- ia `=_ � y _ '
v *
o u <
�w000eoe II
- I
.I
R
C, rr
�W W
I 5c SjI'=oa�O
-qua =i HIP f�
a� n :Aim
im" i
s_ss� i S i
"
R � mH
o 56��7�
HUM
SEEM
V
C
F
r
u.
x
p -�:! � 88piB9d
Z�^ ARSAAA
u 1 ri
r�Q<- s¢ao � � CCCC CCC t6
�o�� ve _r: .� rrr�rrrrrr
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR S YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR I YEAR 9 YEAR 10
FISCAL YEAR (ss K1.D00j end of 1"s 1999 2000 2001 �rT2002 2003 2004 2005 200E 2007
CRT DIRECT COSTS
PSL[F1IEPARTMENI-,CQ$i$
RESIDENTIAL, s0 SO s0 so SO SO so SD SO so
NON-RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE so $0 30 10 30 so so $0 so s0
COMMERCIAL. $11 s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 so s0 s0 so
COMMERCIALANDUSTRIAL s0 so s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 so s0 s0
UGHT INDUSTRIAL s0 s0 SO so SD s0 s0 s0 s0 so
PLPOUCRNSTITUTIONAL so s0 s0 s0 so s0 s0 so s0 s0
PARKSIGOLF COURSES 30 s0 s9 so s0 s0 $O 30 so s0
AGRICULTURAL so so s0 SO s0 s0 s0 30 s0 s0
FLOOD CONTROUCONSTRUCTION AGGREGATES s0 SD so s0 so 30 so s0 s0 so
RECREATION t 1Q 32 SD SO SD SD s0 10 3D 10
TOTAL,POLICE DEPARTMENT COSTS so s0 so so s0 s0 s0 SD s0 s0
FIRE DEPARTMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL
RURAL LIVING s0 $0 s0 so s0 so s0 s0 30 s0
VERY LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL s0 $D s0 so so so s0 so $O s0
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL SO s0 so so so so s0 $D $0 $0
LOW-MEDtLIM•OENSITY RESIDENTIAL s0 s0 $0 s0 so s0 s0 so $O SD
MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTfAL so SD s0 s0 so s0 to s0 $O so
MGH.QElj5fT7YRFS112EN116L, SD sfl SQ SD SD 1D SD 12 so 1D
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL FIRE DEPARTMENT COSTS so s0 s0 s0 so So $0 s0 s0 So
NON.REa_IU£NTLAL S➢ 3D 24 s2 19 iD s2 SQ 10 SQ
TOTAL-FIRE DEPARTMENT COSTS So so 30 s0 SD s0 SO s0 s0 10
p SRI IC MMRKS COSTS
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE so s0 s0 s0 so 30 s0 s0 so so
STREET SWEEPING s0 $0 s0 s0 so s0 so so s0 so
TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATION s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 SO so s0 so
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE s0 so so s0 so so SD s0 s0 s0
PARK MAINTENANCE so so s0 s0 s0 s0 so s0 so s0
STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE so so s0 s0 so so so s0 so so
OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE s0 so s0 so s0 s0 so s0 so s0
TRAIL MAINTENANCE so so $0 s0 so to s0 s0 so so
PLMUC MAKS A_RM MSTR-ATIVPOVISLEAD 1D so SQ so SD 12 so 10 SD SD
TOTAL.PLMUC WORKS COSTS so s0 s0 so s0 30 s0 30 s0 s0
IRM ICE 10 14AAN S RVICES
RESIDENTIAL so so so s0 so s0 s0 30 $0 so
RM.RFRIMMU 1D SD to 1D so 1D 19 10 Sp ID
TOTAL,ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES!REDEVELOPMENT s0 $0 s0 so $0 s0 so s0 $0 so
COMM IN17Y DEVELOPMENT 2
RESIDENTIAL s0 s0 s0 $0 $D s0 so s0 s0 so
HON•R�EtmAI so 1D SD 1D 1D 39 10 so m 10
TOTAL-COMMUNFFY DEVELOPMENT s0 $0 s0 SO so so s0 so so so
I IJIRARY
RESIDENTIAL so s0 s0 $0 $0 s0 s0 SD 30 s0
NON-,REpMDEHT AI sD 1D so 1D 1D $D s2 10 1D so
TOTAL,LIBRARY s0 so so so SO s0 s0 SO SO so
CITY OIRECT GOSU
RESIDENTIAL $D s0 so 30 so s0 30 s0 s0 so
NONJIFRII)ENTLAL 1D 12 so SO 39 s4 19 so SD ID
TOTAL.CITY DIRECT COSTS s0 s0 so 10 s0 $0 s0 30 SO s0
CFIY(jFNF al AO C1}AAF�OCT¢
RESIDENTIAL so 3o so so so s0 so so so so
tION-RESIREN-In u 12 so 12 3D 1D S9 SD so so
TOT ,CFFY GENERA V��LNMENT COSTS SD —50 s0 SO SQ SQ s0 s0 so s0
SHADED CELLS ARE VARIASLE ASSUMPTIONS OR INPUTS UNfOUE TO THE PROJECT
c �
f 1�
TABLE 7 � I
CITY Of REDLANDS „}
FISCAL IMPACT ANALTSLS DETAILED$Uhl MARY
YEAR T YEAR I YEAR S YEAR s YEAR f YEAR& YEAR 7 YEAR& YEARS YEARN
FISCAL YEAR its 91.000} 0,601 IOM im 7400 2001 7407 2007 7061 2M am 2007 OF TOTAL
ONGAW 0 REVENUES
PROPERTY TAWFR
RESIDENTIAL so so to so to so s0 to s0 so 000:.
NON-RESIDENTLAL to s0 f0 so S0 so so to to so 0Do%
Ls,mrF t€REn own*EajyjAW
RESIDENTIAL s0 so s0 so so so so s0 so s0 a0M.
NON•RESIOENTIAL s0 so so so so so SD so so so 0001.
lg ScFw aonocan Tam
RESCENTLILL s0 to s0 so so so t0 so so 30 0001.
NON-RESIDENTIAL to so s0 s0 so t0 to so s0 s0 Dow_
o-.L FS TAXES
RESIDENTIAL s0 so to 30 so SO to so s6 so 0001.
NoN•RESIOENTIAL so so s0 so s0 so to to s0 so 400:.
RESIDENTIAL so so to so to 3o s0 30 so so 000%
NON•RES[DENTLAL so so so so s0 s0 to to so s0 000%
RESIDENTIAL so so to so to so so s0 60 to 000%
NON-RESIDENTIAL to s0 to s0 $0 f0 t0 so to s0 000=
jR►NSIFNT fSC_(_imAHCY TAY
RESIDENTIAL t0 s0 s0 t0 s0 s0 so s0 to f0 OD01.
NONRESIDENTIAL so to so so so s0 so so so so 000%
rMt F FRANcHiS�FFF REVENUES
RESIDENTIAL so 30 s0 s0 to so s0 so so t6 0001.
NON-RESIDENTIAL s0 s0 s0 s0 to so so t0 s0 s0 a 07
LASER NCHSF CFF RFVFM=
RESIDENTIAL s0 t0 s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 so so s0 DOD.
NON-RESIDENTIAL s0 s0 so so s0 so so so so so 007
6FFCIRICITY FRANCMISF FFF RFVFsa<fES
RES€DENUAL so s0 s0 s0 s0 so so so to t6 a oas.
NON-RESMEIENTIAL s0 s0 so so SO so so so so so 000€,
H WUESS i II UM REVFMTFS
RESIDENTIAL NA NA IIA ALA MA NA NA NA ILL NA 407
NONRESIDENTIAL to so so so to so so so so to D.00L
pj�gllrFNCFc vFR1Al75aFWFS
RESIDENTIAL to to s0 to so so so So s0 $0 DOD%
NON-RESIDENTLLL to so so s0 s0 s0 so so s0 s0 0.00%
STATE RFVEMIFS
RESIDENTIAL so so s0 to so to s0 to so t0 010%.
NON-RESIDENTIAL so fa so so to so to 3o so to aO7
_FF:nraA1 RFVFtag
RESIDENTIAL to so so so so so so so so so 000%
NON-RESIDENTIAL so so so so $0 s0 so so so so 0.OW.
RESIDENIIAL so so so so so so so so so so 0.10L
NON-RESIDENTIAL s0 so to 30 s0 s0 so s0 t0 to 0.00%
RESIDENTIAL so s0 so so so so so s0 so s6 0,001
NONRESIDENTIAL so 30 s0 to s0 so s0 to t0 t0 0.00%
RESIDENTIAL to t0 so to t0 to s0 s0 so W 000'
NOH-RESIDENTIAL to 30 so to iG so to so so t0 000%
Inco VN cFNTFR RFVEMIFS
RESIDENTIAL s0 so s0 so s0 s0 30 s0 so so AM%
NON-RESIDENTIAL s0 so s0 so so so s0 so t0 so MOM
I WRARY RFVFNLIES
RESIDENTIAL s0 so t0 so t0 s0 s0 so $0 so 0001.
NON-RESIDENTIAL so so s0 so so so SO so t0 to 0.60S
EARKSRFVFMIS
RESIDENTIAL s0 s0 to t0 so so so so 30 so 040%
NON-RESMENTIAL to so t0 s0 so s0 s0 t0 so s0 *.So%
PLANNING REVENUES
HESIDENTIAL f0 so so s0 s0 so s0 so s0 to can%
NON-RESIDENTIAL s0 s0 so so so s0 3D t0 s0 s0 0.001.
M 1CFRFYFMIFS
RESIDENI1At so so so s0 so s0 so so so so 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL so so so so so w s0 s0 so t0 0.001E
pd Irc AN%tAi:DMROLRHENUE5
RESIDENTIAL to so so s0 so t0 s0 s0 s0 to O.Om
NON-RESIDENTIAL so to s0 so s0 so so to s0 so ad*%
NEG9EATj0tjUVENUU
RESIDENIIAL so so 30 so so so t0 so so so OW16
NON•RESIDENTUL so so so s0 so so to so to to 0.01%
VUTFRFI I ND Cu►Rr:FR RFVFMIFS
RESIDENTIAL__— —— to s0 s0 to t0 to so s0 s0 s0 O.Ocm
NON-RESIDENTIAL s0 s0 s0 s0 so s0 to so t0 so 0.011E
R£SIDENIIAL so so s0 so s0 so s0 s6 36D s0 0.001E
NON•RESIDENI&AL so to to to to s0 s0 s0 so 30 0.s1%
RF:Nlat INCQUr REVENUE[
RESIDENTIAL so so s0 so s0 s0 to so to so 1.41E
NON-RESIDENTIAL s0 s0 so so t0 t0 t0 t0 s0 t0 O.00Y
�RIRIIruYuc wcvclAlFs
RESIDENTIAL So so s0 tO so so s0 so Nl so 0.00%
NON-RE57DENYLAL to s0 to so s0 30 s0 so to s0 0A0%
01MERSEVENUES
RESIDENTIAL s0 s0 s0 t0 so t0 s0 t0 so to Won
MON-RESIDENTIAL to t0 s0 so s0 t0 s0 so s0 so RICO%
TOTAL REsMENIIALREVEMAS so so so s0 10 so so to so to 0.0011
=At MON.RFSIRFMIAI RFIFMIFS as 2D t0 ZD a0 19 W So AD a0 D.00Y
TOTAL ONLOaJG REVENUES so so s0 s0 s0 so so s0 so to
T m R � y
TEAR I YEAR 7 TEAR 7 TEAR A YEAR L YEAR i YEAR T TEAR i YEARS YEAR 10 '..
FISCAL YEAR rEal IRI IRP 21100 2001 7002 2007 7001 3001 2004 7007 OF TOT..
(114 11.0001
ON60Mi0 COSTS
Rc>r Ire ncPaRTuFNT COSTS
RESIDENTLAL to so so SO so to so so to so 0w
NDN-RESIDEN7IAL so so to to so so so so u to o P0'
s0 so so 30 so so so to 10 ow-
RESIDENTIAL s0
NON-RESIDENTIAL s0 so so to so 39 so so so so Poo
mxq
RESIDENTIAL so so to so so so so so so s0 Pow
so so so so so so 30 so so so 000-
AFMOEMIIAL so so s0 so so so to sa t0 u aO(r_
NONMc-nENTML so so so so to so to so so s0 000:.
RESIDENTUI i0 so so s0 to $0 so s0 so t0 0001
NON-REMENTIAL s0 s0 s0 s0 so s0 so to s0 t0 000..
RESIDENTIAL lUFHT COST fO so so so so so to so to so Do"
NON-RESIDENTIAL 3o so s0 so s0 so so so to sd 0001.
I IOURY COSTS
RESIDENTIAL to so to to so to to so so so 0.00*.
NON-RESIDENTW. so to so to so so so so to so 000:.
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL COSTS s0 s0 so to to so s0 s0 s0 10 000!.
TOTAL a-ZESQEffEALQ= 110 so 30 30 30 30 30 to 30 30 Goo.—
TOTAL
oo.TOTAL ON-GOING COSTS so s0 so so so w to to to so
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL ONGOMIG SURPLUSnWFICITI to so so so so SO so to so so
ANNUAL NON-RESMENTIAL 0NGvOING SUHPLUMDffI M 30 30 H 30 u 30 so i0 30
TOTAL ANNUAL ONGOING SURPLUW(DEFJCM so u so so so so so to to to
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 0.00 0.00 000 000 0.00 0.00 CAD 000 0.00 0,00
ANNUAL NON-usiaENTiAL REYENUEICOST RATIO 0.00 Am 0.00 O.Oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
T07AL ANNUAL RFYFNUFICOST AATIO 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 00P 000
FABLE 8 -
"ITY OF REDLANDS ^r
-ISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS SUMMARY ,
r
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 0 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 %
ISCAL YEAR I$$x1,000) and of 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 OF TOTAL
]NGOING REVENUES
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
EM WRESIDENIIAL REVENUES ID S.4 SD $4 $0 $0 $4 SO s0 $Q 000%
TOTAL ON-GOING REVENUES $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o
7NGOING COSTS
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL COSTS SO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $D 000%
TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL COSTS SD $.Q SD SD SD 54 SQ $D SD SO 000%
TOTAL ON-GOING COSTS SO $0 SO SO $0 $0 $0 SO SD So
4NNUAL RESIDENTIAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
4NNUAL NON RESIDENTIAL ONGOING SURPLUSADEFICIT) to SQ $D SD 50 SD 54 SD 50 SO
TOTAL ANNUAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0 So SO $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 0.00 0.00 0-00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
ANNUAL NON RESIDENTIAL REVENUE/COST RATIO coo 000 0.00 coo 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0 o0 0.00
TOTAL ANNUAL REVENJJ.EJI;2ST RATIO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Goo 0.00
TABLE 9
CITY OF REDLANDS
SCHOOL FEE MITIGATION
FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL FEE MITIGATION COMMERCIAL SCHOOL FEE MITIGATION
DEVELOPER FEE REVENUE PER SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED UNIT 11 33.348 55 DEVELOPER FEE REVENUE PER COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOT 11 $0.31
DEVELOPER FEE REVENUE PER MULTIFAMILY ATTACHED UNIT 12 $181 a
1810 34
DEVELOPER FEE REVENUE PER MOBILE HOME 13 32,514 79
1 Based on an average square footage per SFD of 1 735 SF times the maximum developer 1 Maidmum developer lee par commercial SF disclosed In The Redlands Unified District
lee per residential SF of$193 disclosed in the Redlands Unified School District Residential School CommarciaMridusltial School Fee Justification Study
Fee Justification Study
2 Based on an average square footage per MFA at 938 SF times the maximum developer
fee per residential SF of S 193 disclosed in the Redlands Unified School District Residential School
Fee Justilicalion Study
3 Based on an average square footage per mobile home of 1 303 SF limes the maximum developer
lee per restdenlial SF of 31 93 disclosed in the Redlands Unified School District Residential School
Fee Justilicahon Study
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 6 YEAR I YEAR 10
FISCAL YEAR (Ss x1 000) and of 1994 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
CITY OF REDLANDS
ANNUAL PROJECTED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
SFD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MFA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mobile Home 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CUMULATIVE PROJECTED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT _
SFD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MFA a 0 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0)
Mobile Home 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ANNUAL SCHOOL FEE MITIGATION
RESIDENTIAL
SFU s0 s0 s0 s0 $0 s0 s0 $0 s0 so
MFA $0 $0 s0 so s0 s0 so so so so
Mobile Home 112 to s4 so so 30 iD SD 40 30
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL FEE MITIGATION s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 so 30 s0 s0 $0
BION 13FSipe4n tt so 3o so s0 s0 $0 3o so so $0
TOTAL ESTIMATED SCHOOL FEE M111QATION
CUMULATIVE SCHOOL FEE M11TIGATION
RESIDENTIAL
SFO s0 so $0 so $0 3o s0 s0 $0 so
MFA $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 s0 $o $0 so
Mobite Home SQ so so so so so 10 411 so so
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL FEE MITIGATION s0 so so s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 so
NON-RESIDENTIAL SD sit so 39 34 s9 14 so so so
TOTAL ly$TIM)IYED V11,110%FEE M111I9,/ITION — so so so So so So _ so so so s0
SHADED CELLS ARE VARIABLE ASSUMPTIONS OR INPUTS UNIQUE TO THE PROJECT
NOTE. THE ABOVE MITIGATION PROJECTIONS ARE FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY ACTUAL FEES WILL BE BASED ON PRODUCT UNIQUE SQUARE FOOTAGES
Appendix B
Analysis of City Budget and Methodological Approach
CITY OF tiREDLANDS
ANALYSIS OF FINANCING SOURCES FOR GENERAL FUND
FISCAL YEAR 1996 99
SOURCE CLASSIFICATION BUDGET METHODOLOGY COSTAJNIT
TAXES
Current Secured Taxes $5.350,004 CASE STUDY NA
Current Unsecured Taxes S306,tm0 CASE STUDY NA
Supplemental Roll Secured S15,400 NA NA
Supplemental Roll Unsec So NA NA
Supplemental Rall Prior $68,200 NA NA
Pnor Unsecured Prop Tax 59,000 NA NA
Prior Secured Prop Tax $354,000 NA NA
Possessory Interest Tax $127.000 NA NA
City Sales and Use Tax $6,799,000 CASE STUDY NA
Property Transfer Tax $100,000 CASE STUDY NA
Transient Occupancy Tax $200,000 CASE STUDY NA
Franchises $655,000 CASE STUDY NA
llaility users Tax so NA NA
TOTAL TAXES 513,963,200 $0.00
LICENSES,PERMITS,&FINES
Business Licenses $1,150,000 CASE STUDY NA
Dog Licenses&Penalties $38,000 NET COST NA
Bicycle licenses $350 NET COST NA
Pian Check Microfilming 53,000 NET COST NA
Mobile Home Parts Inspection $5,336 NET COST NA
NE Area Plan Fee 5G NET COST NA
State Man Gen Plan Review 97.000 NET COST NA
Seismic Energy Plan Check S0 NET COST NA
Research on Request Fee 5250 NET COST NA
Building Plan Checking $90,000 NET COST NA
Building Permits 5140,000 NET COST NA
Electrical Inspection $30,000 NET COST NA
Plumbing inspection $20,000 NET COST NA
Grading&Paving Inspect $5.000 NET COST NA
Heat &Air Cond inspect 915,000 NET COST NA
Strong Motion Educ Fee $0 NET COST NA
Solar 50 NET COST NA
Cert of Occup inspect $15.400 NET COST NA
Swimming Pools $5.000 NET COST NA
Hot Tubs $2,000 NET COST NA
Roil Recover $30,000 NET COST NA
Signs S2,500 NET COST NA
Building Removed Bldg S4 NET COST NA
Grading Permit Review 5400 NET COST NA
City Ordinance Violation ST NET COST NA
TOTAL LICENSES,PERMITS i FINES $1,66$536 50.00
STATE
011 Highway License Fee So NA NA
Motor Vehicle Fees!t S2,67G.000 PER CAPITA $40.39
Stale Grants So NA NA
FloodlEarthquake Relief $0 NA NA
Reimb Mandated Casts Other $15,000 NA NA
C-CAP Grant(OC.1P) So NA NA
SHO Grant fOCJ? S6R-37 GRANT NA
TOTAL STATE $2,753,375 540.39
1 Nolp that legtsiation Is being prapoesd to mduc*and phaseout this subvention.
FEDERAL
SYTEP S54,699 GRANT NA
Mayors LLE Grant $105,364 GRANT NA
Cops Ahead Grant $0 GRANT NA
COPS Problem Salving Grant $142,000 GRANT NA
COPS MORE Grant(Fed) $0 GRANT NA
OTS Grani S71.lXi6 GRANT NA
TOTAL FEDERAL $369,129 NA
I
I i I ! i 1
1 `1!
CITY OF REDLANDS l J
ANALYSIS OF FINANCING SOURCES FOR GENERAL FUND
FISCAL YEAR 1"8-"
SOURCE CLASSIFICATION BUDGET METHODOLOGY COSTIUNIT
CITY ATTORNEY
NET COST N8
TOTAL CITY ATTORNEY $67,066 $000
ENGINEERING SERVICES
Street Permits $100,000 NET COST NA
Outdoor Dining Permits $450 NET COST NA
Landfill Mitigation Fees $77000 NET COST NA
Building Moving Review $500 NET COST NA
Conditional Use Review $8.000 NET COST NA
Comm Review Process $3.000 NET COST NA
Tentative Sbdiv Map Review $2.500 NET COST NA
Final Sbdiv Map Plan Ck $6,000 NET COST NA
Envir Impact Review $2000 NET COST NA
Misc Planning Application $0 NET COST NA
Street Plan Check Fees $4,000 NET COST NA
Improv Agreement Engin $0 NET COST NA
Reimb Jobs Streets $5,000 NET COST NA
Street Cleaning Fees 5295,000 NET COST NA
Litter Control_Eees S3- NET COST NB
TOTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES $507,050 S000
FIRE DEPARTMENT
False Alarm(Fire) $9,000 NET COST NA
Fire Dept Reports $100 NET COST NA
Incident Report $1,000 NET COST NA
Special Reports $0 NET COST NA
Copies so NET COST NA
Investigative Reports so NET COST NA
Plan Reviews $5.000 NET COST NA
Auto Fire&Life Safety $5,000 NET COST NA
State Mandated Inspect $1,500 NET COST NA
Fire Prevention Inspect $14,000 NET COST NA
Engine Ca Inspections $25000 NET COST NA
Gen Permds/Haz Condit $8,000 NET COST NA
Special Permits $3,000 NET COST NA
Weed Abate Enforcement 5321000 NET COST NA
Weed Abatement Tax Liens $45,000 NET COST NA
Fire Prevention Services $1,000 NET COST NA
Cost Recov/Special Events $100 NET COST NA
Hazardous Materials $3000 NET COST NA
Fire Service Contracts 675,000 NET COST NA
Mutual Aid Response Reimb 635,000 NET COST NA
Fire lncidentRenortino SD NET COST NA
TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT $262,700 $0.00
JOSLYN CENTER
Joslyn Contributions $0 NET COST NA
Joslyn Building Rental $8,000 NET COST NA
Joslyn Special Program $10,000 NET COST NA
.loslya Movies sm NET COST NA
TOTAL JOSLYN CENTER $1817W $0.00
CITY OF REDLANDS
ANALYSIS OF FINANCING SOURCES FOR GENERAL FUND
FISCAL YEAR 1998"
SOURCE CLASSIFICATION BUDGET METHODOLOGY COSTIUNIT
LIBRARY
Library Fines 518,000 NET COST NA
Library Nan Resident Fee $11000 NET COST NA
Library State Grants $37983 GRANT NA
Video Tape Rentals $4.000 NET COST NA
I MMI 1 Shone 535.0!10 NET COST N.A
TOTAL LIBRARY 585,983 $0.00
PARKS
Sylvan Pk Bandstand Rental s0 NET COST NA
Park Resry(Use)Fees $4,000 NET COST NA
Sylvan Park Shelter Area s0 NET COST NA
Park Attendant Fees s0 NET COST NA
Sylvan Park Picnic Rental $5,000 NET COST NA
Library Petit Maint Svcs $D NET COST NA
Bowl Rental S8,000 NET COST NA
Sewall Theatre Rental SE00 NET COST NA
TOTAL PARKS $15,200 $0.00
PLANNING
East valley Corridor s0 NET COST NA
Pin Dev Concept/Dev Plan 522,900 NET COST NA
Specific Pians 520,200 NET COST NA
Specific Plan $D NET COST NA
Specific Plan Amendment 50 NET COST NA
Conditional Use Permits $70,900 NET COST NA
CUP Involving New Const s0 NET COST NA
CUP Involv No New Const $0 NET COST NA
CUP Time Extension $0 NET COST NA
Revised CUP Const $0 NET COST NA
Revised CUP-No Const $0 NET COST NA
Variances 521,900 NET COST NA
Var Fence Committee s0 NET COST NA
Var Single Family Res s0 NET COST NA
Var Comm Multi Family s0 NET COST NA
Building Moving Review $11200 NET COST NA
Main Structure s0 NET COST NA
CRA Major(Over 1 Acre) $90.270 NET COST NA
CRA Minor(1 Acre/Less) $0 NET COST NA
CRA Time Extension $0 NET COST NA
Minor Commission Reviews s0 NET COST NA
CRA Revised Major s0 NET COST NA
CRA Revised Minor $0 NET COST NA
General Plan Review $10,400 NET COST NA
General Plan Amendment $0 NET COST NA
Tentative Subdiv Maps $28,£00 NET COST NA
Parcel Map $0 NET COST NA
Rever to Acreage/Morger SD NET COST NA
Tentative Tract s0 NET COST NA
Rev Tentative Tract Map s0 NET COST NA
Subdivision Time Exlension s0 NET COST NA
Lot Line Adjustment $0 NEC COST NA
Certificate of Compliance s0 NET COST NA
Envir Impact Review $65,000 NET COST NA
Negative Deciaration $0 NET COST NA
Envir Protect Assessment $0 NET COST NA
Environmental Impact Report so NEC COST NA
Mitig Mon Rav&Impimtn $0 NET COST NA
Resod Devel Allocation $14640 NET COST NA
RDA so NET COST NA
RDA Aft of Appi v Pdct s0 NET COST NA
Appeal Processing Plan s0 NEC COST NA
Home Oceupation Permit $1D,000 NEC COST NA
Staff Review s0 NEC COST NA
Annual Renewal $0 NET COST NA
Ordinance Text Amend $5,200 NET COST NA
Zone Change s0 NET COST NA
Sign Review $11 900 NET COST NA
One Sign s0 NEC COST NA
Sign Program s0 NET COST NA
Flag Test s0 NET COST NA
Sign Review by Staff s0 NET COST NA
Ariricnrinm Immt plan Comm 528,300 NET COST NA
Jill E I
CITY OF REDLANDS
ANALYSIS OF FINANCING SOURCES FOR GENERAL FUND
FISCAL YEAR 1998.99
SOURCE CLASSIFICATION BUDGET METHODOLOGY COSTIUNIT
Development Agreements s0 NET COST NA
Verii Leiter Basic s0 NET COST NA
Temporary Occupancy s0 NET COST NA
Surface Mining so NET COST NA
Code Enforcement $6,100 NET COST NA
Bldg Demo-Desig Struct s0 NET COST NA
Accessory Bldg-Nondesig $0 NET COST NA
Bid Demo Nondesig $1,300 NET COST NA
Single Farruly Zones-ND $0 NET COST NA
Socio-Economic Studies $60,000 NET COST NA
Planning Publications 511500 NET COST NA
Nisi_Commission Public, NET COST N6
TOTAL PLANNING $410,235 s0
POLICE
Concealed Weapon Permit $2000 NET COST NA
P O S T Reimbursement $10,500 NET COST NA
Aeimb Mand Costs PD $32,000 NET COST NA
DARE $13,000 NET COST NA
Police Depositions $1,750 NET COST NA
Market Night Security $30,000 NET COST NA
Police Contract Services $20,000 NET COST NA
Vehicle impound Fee $75,000 NET COST NA
Tow Program Fees $100,000 NET COST NA
2nd Response-Gatherings $100 NET COST NA
False Alar Fees Police S20,00D NET COST NA
Police Crime Report Sales $6,500 NET COST NA
Record Check Gear Police $7,000 NET COST NA
Police Photograph Sales $1,500 NET COST NA
Mavie/TV Sites 5 Crowds $5,000 NET COST NA
Confiscation Proceeds 52,500 NET COST NA
Booking Fees Restitution $5,000 NET COST NA
Traffic Restitution $950 NET COST NA
County Prisoner Housing $40,000 NET COST NA
Accident Reports Police $12,000 NET COST NA
Fingerprinting $3,500 NET COST NA
Adult Performer Permits $4,000 NET COST NA
Massage Permits $1,000 NET COST NA
S12.114i2 NET COST NA
TOTAL POLICE $405,300 $000
POLICE-ANIMAL CONTROL
Adoption Saks $5,000 NET COST NA
Board Fees $2,000 NET COST NA
Owner Release for Adoption $6,500 NET COST NA
Shelter Apprehension Fees $8,000 NET COST NA
Shelter Deposit Fees $750 NET COST NA
AmMal Tran Rentals S1, NET COST NA
TOTAL POLICE-ANIMAL CONTROL 523.260 $000
CITY OF REDLANDS
ANALYSIS OF FINANCING SOURCES FOR GENERAL FUND
FISCAL YEAR 1998 99
SOURCE CLASSIFICATION BUDGET METHODOLOGY COSTIUNIT
RECREATION
Swimming lessons $10,000 NET COST NA
Public Swimming 52,600 NET COST NA
Swimming Passes SSW NET COST NA
Wading Pool Rental $0 NET COST NA
Twinges Program SO NET COST NA
water Polo 5500 NET COST NA
Twinges in Hinges Grant $10,000 NET COST NA
Photocopy Income $0 NET COST NA
Balltield Rental/Lights $7500 NET COST NA
Softball Field Prop $0 NEC COST NA
Community Cir Pay Phone $150 NET COST NA
United Way Special Prog $1000 GRANT NA
Steele Fund Grant Award $1,000 GRANT NA
Adult Softball 560,000 NET COST NA
Adult Basketball $1,250 NET COST NA
Adult Volleyball $1 500 NET COST NA
Youth Football $2200 NET COST NA
Youth Basketball S7 500 NET COST NA
Youth Softball 54,500 NET COST NA
Youth 5pudball $3,500 NET COST NA
Youth Fast Pitch $0 NET COST NA
Youth T Ball $400 NET COST NA
Baseball for Youth Reimb $10,000 NET COST NA
Scout House Rental SSW NET COST NA
Facility Rental $15,000 NET COST NA
Racquetball Rental/Passes $3,000 NET COST NA
Equipment Rental $1000 NET COST NA
Concession Stand Service $1500 NET COST NA
Games income S1 500 NET COST NA
Gym Use Fees 5o NET COST NA
Tournaments $0 NET COST NA
Class Registrations $0 NET COST NA
Contract Classes $30,000 NET COST NA
Cleaning Fee $O NET COST NA
Stats Supervision Fee $1 ODD NET COST NA
Ceramics $5,500 NET COST NA
Teen Program $0 NET COST NA
Yr Round School Rec Prog SD NET COST NA
Commun Sr Ctr Programs $1 DO NET COST NA
Light Meters 5400 NET COST NA
Tennis Lessons $100 NET COST NA
Swap Meals $900 NET COST NA
Easter Programs s0 NET COST NA
Garden Plot Rental $300 NET COST NA
Recreation Donations S650 NET COST NA
Seruor Center_Doaa ions SL2Q➢ NET COST NA
TOTAL RECREATION $106,$50 NA
INTERFUND CHARGES
in-Lieu Property Taxes $725,669 NA NA
Gen Gov't Overhead $2,025,912 NA NA
Street Replacement $255,563 NET COST NA
In•1iPu Franchise Fees S400.2NA NA
TOTAL INTERFUND CHARGES $3,407 434 50.00
INVESTMENT INCOME
Income From Investments S540,oD0 CASE STUDY NA
Debt Svc Forward Supply 50 NA NA
Int on Due From Other SO NA NA
Land gala Notes SQ NA NA
TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME $540,000 NA
RENTAL INCOME
Showmobile Rental $0 NA NA.
Land and Bldg Rental 550,000 NA NA
City Owned Housing 3D NA NA
TOTAL RENTAL INCOME 550,000 NA
CITY OF REDLANDS
ANALYSIS OF FINANCING SOURCES FOR GENERAL FUND '
FISCAL YEAR 1998.99
SOURCE CLASSIFICATION BUDGET METHODOLOGY COSTIUNIT
DONATIONSICONTRIB U'TIONS
Dgj)0tians1Qpntdbutto S&2, NA NA
TOTAL DONATIONS/CONTRIBUTIONS 542,00 NA
OTHER REVENUE
Bad Debt Recoveries $1000 NA NA
Miscellaneous Refunds SO NA NA
Intem Work Study Reimb $15000 NA NA
Miscellaneous Receipts $10000 NA NA
Misc 'Taxable Sales $400 NA NA
Banner Pemtfts 511500 NA NA
Bad Check Collection 50 NA NA
Sale of Surplus Property SD NA NA
NA N6
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 5271910 NA
TOTAL GENERAL FUND SOURCES 524,719,218
1998 ESTIMATED CITY POPULATION 11 56,110
1 Pursuant to January 1, 1998 population provided by the Calffomta Depamswnt of Finance('DOF')
I
CCfY OF RBDLANDS ? I
ANALYSIS OF FINANCING REQUIREMENTS FOR GBNF*AL FUND
FISCAL YEAR 3995-19
REWREMENT CLASSIFICATION BUDGET YETHODOLOOY COSTMNTT
GENERAL GOVERNUENT
Cay Cssrpl $110.56 %OF DIRECT NA
City Cert S157.5D1 % DFREC7 NA
CityLwwwr $162.401 %OFDIRECT NA
pnyryw 554,761 % DIRECT NA
pwsva»I $219Ad2 %OFDIRECT NA
Summar YaAn Emp1 4SYETPI SS0.699 %OFDIRECT NA
p $137.415 %OFDIRECT NA
slo" 576,724 % DIRECT NA
wur2Ars Camp w4awrce $1.030.016 % DIRECT NA
Fmwwt 5351,605 % DIRECT NA
Gravy Garany1 l S1.O13.649 %OF DIRECT NA
Lnaaay bmum ar 5494.000 %OF DIRECT NA
Ceimim s d pansopsppn 52.450.511 %OF DIRECT NA
Gen Optgasan Moasuy O $519102 %OF DIRECT NA
Cny7nasurar 5332.746 % DIRECT NA
Faroaatunprpgram S3.565 %OFDIRECT NA
vwwz S17.EO7 %OFDIRECT NA
Ca An9afu SUM % DIRECT aA
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT $7.520.159 MA
COMMINNITY DEVELOPMENT
Cammnay Owyaprnant Dw&vnsm S5 AI I PER CAPITA 16.25
Corral Pm Nawmy'vilato 50 KA NA
µy X01 NA 49A
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 8102.212 $11M
LMIRARY
Lrrary A&NnaUM= 599274 PER CAPITA 514.46
Lrmin Sari. 515.000 NA NA
Ptak Lioary Fa+maon 537.579 PER CAPITA 10.57
1IMMUMMaIlLun= 3p NA NA
TOTAL LIBRARY 51,051,11M llism
POLMMMUMAN SERVICES
pd,w s4gpm SWWWAS 51.559.652 CASE STUDY NA
AnarW Control 57692" CASE STUDY NA
DARE 524.636 CASE STUDY NA
Prong Control 581.92 CASE STUDY NA
Votry"r Saurus 517.800 CASE STUDY NA
Poke Commurwlms 5609.752 CASE STUDY NA
Potu rrrasl,gavw Samns 31 120,752 CASE STUDY NA
CMW An*VW 5176295 CASE STUDY NA
Pptaa Cmanuyy Paturg BWMu $2.347275 CASE STUDY NA
Pak* OTS Gans $71.026 CASE STUDY NA
Potaa SHO Gans 568.375 CASE STUDY NA
Ponca Peal Sarw*s 57,830.071 CASE STUDY NA
Pays AB3229 590.661 CASE S IUOY NA
Mayors LLE Bic*Gnry 1971 572.000 CASE STUDY NA
Mayors LLE block Crary{9l 51DSA84 CASE STUDY NA
593.666 CASE STUDY NA
Pauca Dap2nnwnt SWOLAI $10.756.730
Human SOMM so NETCOST NA
Community 5srvrus Admwat man 50 NET COST NA
Fmrmye DvftW nrrr W NET COST NA
jw"Sarror Csna1 566.792 NET COST NA
Raaostlon A&TWdsin"M 5394,637 HET DOST NA
Yowl Spans 5110,90 NET COST NA
AOM Spam 5179.457 NET COST NA
Buadrq A Grrraxan IBAGI $5.000 NET COST NA
Alp 520,298 NET COST NA
MustbEllowl-ELZOM SIll.9" HET COST IIA
tYarun Swoon St6t" 5835.974 50.63
FM
Fra Aoaa lusson $4,013.397 CASE STUDY NA
Fra Pnmwb n 5166,415 CASE STUDY NA
Wald Abatement 152.700 CASE STUDY NA
Praprty tlaand Ab&WWl 50 CASE STUDY NA
F" Traarg S&M CASE STUDY NA
Can F"JPA $119.372 CASE STUDY NA
EM2Lp90GPM11!>Id S sill Ml CASE STUDY B6
TOTAL FIRE $4.419,115 NA
PUBLIC WORKS
Sutut Dn>marr Grwal 1320.160 NA NA
SlrW L4&**rrar%a "9101 $766,622 CASE STUDY NA
Slr"l 4assu"swv 5246.341 CASE STUDY NA
Asimorrsaaa OMw Dapt.s $0 NA NA
RarnbuMa6N 10 NA NA
COKcnn lAaayarrar= 194211 NA NA
SYMI SSR Mw"narrpa 579&757 NA NA
61?W parry M mitenance 90 NA NA
Sum Drain Msw*wvw w s0 NA NA
wood Coma 50 NA NA
SttMt Crsar" 10 CASE STS]DY NA
A9 wMUvepn and Eaprwn g 5752.760 CASE STUDY NA
Emancsl 5".561 RA NA
Trlghc Flgny YaryrrlMru 5234.293 CASE STUDY NA
Stns Lrg`arg Maryrunca 5929,752 CASE STUDY NA
twcmw Rarrrrl sinus 50 NA NA
Elsn11cs1 Co nvxucaMm STti6S NA NA
T1ss Marmorance Naguar 5461.654 CASE STUDY NA
SIA Bus Adan Two Gram so NA NA
Ulaan Faravy Gant S0 NA NA
BLOWS Sarypas 1616.100 CASE STUDY NA
Cny.preyp Haang 10 NA NA
166 Ewata so NA NA
ENKLMMIUMAM 51.7153574 CASE STUDY LA
TGTAL PUBLIC WORKS 54.611,616 NA
TOTAL GENERAL FUND USES SMIMA"
196 S.STWATTM 4xry POPULATION tl ",190
I Prralxry b Jantwy 1 199 poprArrar prvnasd 6y aM CM*w"DopwWwg of F=rarroa rDOF-I
CRY OF REDLANDS
ANALYSIS OF GENERAL FUND SOURCES AND USES L�
FISCAL YEAR 1998-99
Total Total Net Net Cost
l QQ= Revenues Q= Mathodntoav Multi ur
City Council $110 32B S102.344 $7.984 %of DIRECT NA
City Clerk $153,504 $6.752 $146752 %of DfRECT NA
City Manager $217,565 $108590 $108.975 %of DIRECT NA
City Attorney $334861 $67,066 S267795 %of DIRECT NA
City Treasurer 5336,331 S274,572 $61,759 %of DIRECT NA
Finance $567,834 $386010 $181824 %of DIRECT NA
General Government S1 013 649 S266198 $747,451 %of DIRECT NA
Mgmt Into Services S350,924 $115,367 $235,557 %of DIRECT NA
Personnel S219.882 566.861 $153021 %of DIRECT NA
Planning S5.45411 $410,235 $135,176 NET COST S205
Mudding 8 Safety 5357,401 $374186 ($16785) NET COST {50.25}
Police' $10 311 925 $470.564 59,841,361 CASE STUDY NA
Police Human Services $933,934 $20435o 5729 5B4 NET COST $1104
Fire $4469,115 $262,700 $4,206,415 CASE STUDY NA
PW Streets $1830,032 $1,656,063 $173,969 CASE STUDY NA
PW Engineering $332,160 $527,100 ($194940) CASE STUDY NA
PW Electrical $117866 $117,666 CASE STUDY NA
PW Parks $1053.624 515,200 $1,038,424 CASE STUDY NA
PW Street Trees $461,654 $461,654 CASE STUDY NA
PW Building Svcs 5B16100 $158,973 $657,127 CASE STUDY NA
Library' $983,870 $48,000 $935,870 NET COST $1416
Totals ' S25,517970 $5,521131 $19 996,1139
General Revenues" $19 604 559 ($19,604,559)
Transfers In AOMD 520.000 (520.000)
Transfers In Retirement 5225 000 (S225000)
Gen Gov't Service Charge Revenue
Liability $494000 $148,130 $345,870
Redlands Public Imp Corp $1.433,300 $368401 $1,064,899
Transfers Out Paramedic Fund $380,000 $380,000
Net Loans to Other Funds $400,000 5400.000
S28.225270 $25,857,221 S2,338049
Excludes$537 487 in grant revenues and expenditutes
"Includes taxes,certain interfund charges investment income and misc revenue