Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_31-1996_CCv0001.pdf AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR WATER SYSTEM FACILITIES MASTER PLAN This Agreement is made and entered into as of this 2nd day of April, 1996, by and between City of Redlands Municipal Utilities Department, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and CH2M HILL, hereinafter referred to as "ENGINEER". In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties do hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 -.ENGAGEMENT OF THE ENGINEER 1.1 The CITY hereby engages the ENGINEER, and the ENGINEER hereby accepts the engagement to perform engineering services for the Water System Facilities Master Plan, hereinafter referred to as "Project". 1.2 All services under this Agreement shall be done in a professional manner, and the ENGINEER represents that the firm employs those persons with the demonstrated skill and the professional expertise necessary to provide high quality services under this Agreement. 1.3 The ENGINEER shall be responsible, to the level of competency presently maintained by other practicing professional engineers providing the same type of services, for the professional and technical soundness, accuracy and adequacy of all reports, designs, drawings, specifications, and other services and materials furnished under tbis Agreement. ARTICLE 2 - SERVICES OF THE ENGINEER 2.1 The ENGINEER shall perform the services required for the Project as defined in Attachment A, Scope of Work. 1 Nater System Facilities Master Plan 2.2 Additional services may be provided by the ENGINEER when requested and a r by the CITY and agreed to by the ENGINEER. pp oved N ARTICLE 3 - RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY 3.1 The CITY shall place at the disposal of the ENGINEER all available information pertinent to the Project, including previous reports and any other data relative to the Project. 3.2 The CITY shall provide access to and make all provisions for the ENGINEER to enter upon public and private lands as required for the ENGINEER to perform his services under this Agreement. 3.3 The CITY shall provide all environmental assessments or impact reports required for this project and not otherwise specifically required to be provided by the ENGINEER. 3.4 The CITY shall designate in writing a person to act as the CITY'S representative with respect to the services to be performed under this Agreement, such person to have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define the CITY's policies and decisions with respect to materials, equipment, elements and systems pertinent to the services covered by this Agreement. ARTICLE 4 - PERIOD OF SERVICE 4.1 The ENGINEER shall proceed with the engineering services set forth in Article 2 in accordance with the schedule defined in Attachment B: Schedule. 4.2 The ENGINEER shall proceed with the services under this Agreement promptly and shall prosecute them diligently. ARTICLE 5 - PAYMENTS TO THE ENGINEER 5.1 For the services performed under Article 2, Owner shall pay the ENGINEER on a time and materials basis at the hourly rates shown in Attachment D, Schedule of Rates, except as provided herein. The manhour estimates and total project budget are shown in Attachment C, Fee Proposal. The total amount of compensation for the Project shall not exceed the total shown in Attachment C, Fee Proposal, unless the scope of the Project is materially changed and agreed to by the Parties. 2 i y Water System Facilities Master Plan 5.2 Payment for additional services requested by the CITYer p Article 2.2 shall be in accordance with a separately negotiated fee or in accordance with the hourly rates shown in Attachment D: Schedule of Rates. 5.3 ENGINEER agrees that at the point 75 percent of budgeted costs have been ed for the Project, the ENGINEER will notify the CITY in writing, including a b of re port on job status, p percent complete, analysis of budget, and envisioned expenses to complete the contractual effort. The budget shall not be exceeded except if previously approved by CITY. 5.4 The ENGINEER shall bill the CITY within ten (10) days following the close of each month by submitting an invoice indicating the work performed who performed the work, under which subtask in the Project budget the work was performed, indirect costs, and if requested, the detailed cost of all work including back-up documentation. Payments by CITY to ENGINEER shall be made within 30 days after receipt and approval of ENGINEER'S invoice, by warrant payable to the ENGINEER. 5.5 All notices, bills and payments shall be made in writing and may be given by personal delivery or by mail. Notices, bills and payments sent by mail shall be addressed as follows: TO CITY: Gary Phelps Municipal Utilities Department 35 Cajon Street P.O. Box 3005 Redlands CA 92373 TO ENGINEER: Michael T. Savage CH2M HILL 2510 Red Hill Avenue P.O. Box 15964 Santa Ana CA 92735-0960 When so addressed, such notices shall be deemed given upon deposit in the United States Mail. In all other instances, notices, bills and payments shall be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names and addresses of the person to whom notices, bills and payments are to be given by giving notice pursuant to this Paragraph. 3 Water System Facilities Master Plan ARTICLE 6 - INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION 6.1 ENGINEER shall maintain worker's compensation insurance and, in addition, shall maintain insurance to protect CITY from claims for damage due to bodily injury, personal injury, or death and claims for injury to or destruction of tangible property while performing the services covered by this Agreement. Said public liability and property damage insurance shall be in a minimum combined single limit of $1,000,000, and in the aggregate. The CITY shall be named a primary additional insured on insurance coverage for public liability and property damage. The ENGINEER shall provide CITY with a certificate evidencing such insurance coverage. 6.2 ENGINEER agrees to maintain professional liability insurance pursuant to this paragraph to protect CITY from negligent acts, errors or omissions of a professional nature; the total aggregate of ENGINEER'S professional liability insurance coverage shall be a minimum of $1,000,000. 6.3 ENGINEER agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY and any and all of their elected officials, officers, agents, engineers, and employees from and against all claims, loss, damage, charge or expense, to which they or any of them may be put or subjected to in proportion and to the extent that they arise out of or result from any willful misconduct or negligent act or actions, omission or failure to act on the part of the ENGINEER, his contractors, his suppliers, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts or omissions any of them mai be liable in the performance of the services described in this Agreement. ARTICLE 7 - GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 7.1 In the event of any legal action brought by either party t the other to enforce any of the obligations hereunder or arising out of any dispute nconcernng the terms and conditions hereby created, the losing parry shall pay the prevailing party amounts for fees, costs, expenses, including attorney's fees, as may be set by thesonable Court. 7.2 The ENGINEER shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this Agreement, except with the prior written approval of the CITY and in strict compliance with the terms, provisions, and conditions of the Agreement. 4 Water System Facilities Master Plan 7.3 The key ENGINEER'S personnel proposed for the Project are as follows: Project Manager: Michael T. Savage, F.E. Database/GIS: Lori Armstrong (SSRI) Hydraulic Modeling: Jim McKibben, P.E.Mike Larkin, P.E. Water Facilities/Alternatives Planning: Dan Badaluco, P.E. Water Treatment: David Chang, P.E. ENGINEER agrees that these key people shall be made available and assigned to the CITY'S Project, and that they shall not be replaced without concurrence from the CITY. 7.4 It is understood and agreed by and between the parties that all documents, records, drawings, designs and specifications, cost estimates, and other project documents developed by the ENGINEER pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of CITY and shall be delivered to CITY upon completion of services. Any reuse of such documents for other projects and any use of incomplete documents shall be at the CITY'S sole risk. 7.5 ENGINEER is for all purposes an independent contractor. All qualified personnel provided by ENGINEER pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement are to be employed by ENGINEER for his account only, and in no event shall ENGINEER or any personnel retained by him be deemed to have been employed by the CITY or engaged by the CITY for the account of or on behalf of the CITY. 7.6 Unless earlier terminated, as stipulated below, this agreement shall terminate upon completion and acceptance by the CITY of all services approved for performance under Article 2 of this Agreement. 7.7 This Agreement may be terminated in writing by either party in the event of failure by the other party to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement through no fault of the terminating party: providing, that no such termination may be effected unless the other party is given (1) not less than thirty (30) calendar days written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate, and (2) an opportunity for consultation with the terminating party prior to termination. 5 Water System Facilities Master Plan 7.8 If this Agreement is terminated by the CITY for reasons of default by the ENGINEER, an adjustment to ENGINEER's compensation shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit or unperformed services, and (2) any payment due to the ENGINEER at the time of termination may be adjusted to the extent of any additional costs to the CITY occasioned by the ENGINEER'S default. If termination for default is effected by the ENGINEER, the adjustment in compensation shall provide for payment to the ENGINEER to include a reasonable profit for services rendered and reim- bursement for expenses incurred prior to the termination, in addition to termination settlement costs reasonably incurred by the ENGINEER relating to commitments which had become firm and approved by CITY prior to the termination. 7.9 Upon receipt of a termination notice, the ENGINEER shall (1) promptly discontinue all services affected (unless the notice directs otherwise), and (2) deliver or otherwise make available to the CITY, copies of data, design calculations, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries, and such other information and materials as may have been accumulated by the ENGINEER in performing services under this Agreement. 7.10 ENGINEER shall maintain books and accounts of all project related payroll costs and all expenses and incidental expense. Books shall be available at all reasonable times for examination by the CITY at the office of the ENGINEER. 7.11 This Agreement, including attachments incorporated herein by reference, represents the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties and any negotiations, proposals or oral agreements are intended to be integrated herein and to be superseded by this written Agreement. Any supplement or amendment to this Agreement to be effective shall be in writing and signed by the CITY and ENGINEER. 7.12 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 6 Water System Facilities Master Plan IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of the parties have signed in confirmation of this Agreement. CITY OF REDLANDS CH2M HILL ("CITY") ("ENGINEER") B�00 4*WlB SWEN LARSON y � '-- . YAMES L. BLOOMQUIS Mayor Vice President ATTEST: City lark, C Redlands 7 Water System Facilities Master Plan Attachment A Scope of Work The scope of work for the water facilities master plan is divided into 5 phases: Data Collection, System Review, Plan Formulation and Evaluation, Plan Selection, and Implementation. In the Data Collection Phase, basic data on the system will be collected and reviewed. In System Review Phase water supplies, water demands, operations criteria, facility conditions data, a hydraulic model, and the GIS database will be brought together to evaluate the existing system from hydraulic, operational, and physical perspectives. In the Plan Formulation and Evaluation Phase, alternatives for improvement of the existing system and future expansions will be formulated, presented to the City for comment, then evaluated using operational and costs criteria. Plan Selection will be a key phase for City input. A sensitivity analysis of the Best Apparent Plan will be conducted, the results presented for City concurrence, and then the improvement plan will be refined. The Implementation Phase completes the planning effort with the production of a CIP for City presentation to City Council, development of procedures for keeping the plan up-to-date, and production of final chapters and compilation of the previously developed chapters into the final report. Data Collection Phase Task I Review Master Plans and Updates A review of the following list of references will be conducted focusing on previous assumptions and criteria for the facility design and operations. 1. City of Redlands DPW, Water Division, "Redlands Water Master Plan and Computer Analysis"by Nov. 1975. 2. City of Redlands DPW, Water Division, "Water Master Plan Update"by JMTM, February, 1981. 3. Appendix C to report no. 'I above 4. City of Redlands "Supplemental Study to the 1981 Water Master Plan Update", Dec. 1981. 5. City of Redlands DPW, Water Division. "Flow Availability Study,"August, 1982. 6. City of Redlands"Economic Evaluation of Additional Water Supply Options", September 1983. 7. City of Redlands DPW, Water Division, "Design Report for 12 MGD Treatment Plant, Final Version,**June 1984. 8. City of Redlands Municipal Utilities Dept. "Water System Engineering Report," Volume I of 3, July 1988 by the City of Redlands. 9. City of Redlands Municipal Utilities Dept. "Water Quality Monitoring Plan",Volume 2 of 3,July 1988 by the City of Redlands. 10. City of Redlands Municipal Utilities Dept. "Emergency Chlorination Plan", Volume 3 of 3, July 1988,by the City of Redlands. Task 2 General Plan Review Conduct a detailed review of the 1995 City of Redlands General Plan. Develop growth rate scenarios for concurrence by the Planning Department. Preliminary growth rate estimates will be based on a maximum allowable under Measures N and R, and on a lower projection using current growth rates. Conduct a coordination meeting with City Planning to confirm assumptions regarding land use, population densities, and growth rates. Task 3 Assess Existing Facilities Conduct a preliminary survey of the City water system facilities to confirm their location, capacities, and current operations with Volume I of the Water System Engineering Report. Review field information with the 100-scale Atlas Maps, Valve Book, and Hydrant Gate Book. The data sources will be compared and exceptions noted. Provide data conversion from the hardcopy Atlas Maps to digital format for use in GIS. Mains, valves, fire hydrants, and other facilities will be input along with their key attributes. Dimensions from the road centerline will serve as the basis to align pipelines. Interviews of prospective users of the water facilities GIS will be conducted. The functions within the City that could use the GIS will be summarized, and the types of data sources now being used to carry out these functions will be categorized. A physical database design will be developed for the GIS water system facilities layer(s). This database design will define the specific data elements, physical formats, and coding schemes of the production water facilities database. Based on the database design, data t:�' conversion procedures will be developed. Following acceptance of the conversion analysis approach, a pilot data conversion will be conducted. It is assumed that the total extent of the pilot area will not exceed four GIS tiles. After acceptance of the pilot database, City wide data conversion of the 100-scale Atlas maps will be conducted. A Quality Control Application Plan(QCAP) designed to test GIS coverages for a variety of error conditions will be employed for product Quality. I UC Task 4 Field Data Collection The following information, to be provided by the City, will be reviewed: accumulated data from the City's supervisory control and data acquisition(SCADA) system; pipeline type, installation date, and condition; contour maps and pipeline profiles; pump curves for pump stations and well pumps; pump operational data; check, control, and pressure reducing valves and settings, storage facility water fluctuations data; and Insurance Service Office (ISO) fire rating reports. This data will be used to develop a computer model of the Redlands water system. A combination of two methods will be used for conducting field testing to obtain data for calibrating the computer hydraulic model: pressure-zone monitoring tests and induced-flow tests. For pressure-zone monitoring, coordinate with City staff to set up pressure gauges at representative locations to monitor actual field conditions during high demand periods over a predetermined period of time, and record flows and/or delivered system pressures at the pressure-zone boundaries. If well pump flows are not known and it is impractical to measure them, the delivered system pressure at the well will be measured by City field staff and used for calibration at the pressure-zone boundaries. Induced flow tests involve measuring the flow while one or two hydrants are opened for 10 minutes or measuring the high flow into a large storage tank during a minimum-hour refill condition. The City will be advised on the number and locations of flow tests. The City Fire Marshall will provide data from hydrant tests that have been performed at various times throughout the year. Data obtained from the testing includes flow in gallons per minute, static pressure and residual pressure. Reservoir level information and system pressure information will be provided by the City from records at the Highland Avenue Plant. The accuracy of the water level elevation and pressure recording devices at the Highland Avenue Plant will be reviewed by correlating recorded information with field measurements taken by the City as described above. Measurement of water demands will be done indirectly. A mass balance of the water consumption in a service area will be compared to the measured inflow, outflow, and change in storage. This information will be used to develop demand hydrographs Task 5 Billing System Review Calculate current water demands for each land parcel using billing information and GIS overlay analysis techniques. The primary data source for existing demands is expected to be consumption data downloaded from the City's billing system. There are approximately 18,000 water accounts. The billing system does not have either parcel numbers or pressure zone information, but there are service addresses. In order to associate the billing records to parcels, it will be necessary to locate the accounts geographically with the GIS. Following is the expected development process for locating accounts. 1. The billing information will be address matched to the San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Information Management System(PIMS) database. It is expected that the DIMS database, that provides site addresses for each parcel, will provide the best accuracy and that a majority of accounts will be located in this step. It is anticipated that at least 60% of the accounts will be located in this step. 2. The rejects from the first step will then be address matched to a street centerline coverage obtained from Geographic Data Technologies (GDT) . Because the centerline coverage only has address ranges, the location of the account can be interpolated along the street. The interpolated account locations will attempt to be associated with the respective parcels and their geographic points moved accordingly. It is expected that at least 90%of all accounts will have been located at the conclusion of this step. 3. Any remaining rejects will be located as best as possible by manual placement., using knowledge of the area and assistance from the City. 4. Industrial and commercial accounts will be verified. 5. A list of parcels with no matching account information and non-vacant land use codes will be forwarded to the City for investigation as un-billed or illegal water connections. If the development process for the billing data is not working according, to this plan and the address matching is not providing adequate results, the back-up plan is to use census block information to estimate residential demands based upon population values. Industrial and commercial accounts would still be located as point demands and verified. System Review Phase Task 6 Sources of Supply Information regarding the sources of supply will be obtained from the Water Resources Management Plan. This information will include such information as available flows and water quality. If supplemental information is needed for the Master Plan, this will be identified and conducted under the WRMP. Task 7 Demands and Operation Criteria Water demand estimates will be developed from the billing system review,and the existing land use and zoning data in the GIS database. Water demands will be based on a Z__ combination of land use and the resulting population. Determine whether the methodology developed by Irvine Ranch Water District to disaggregate demands by land use type and water type(i.e.,potable versus non-potable), or the IWR-MAIN software that is currently being used by Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, is appropriate. The selected approach will depend on the results of discussions with City Planning regarding assumptions in the General Plan, and the availability of calibration data. Demands will be disaggregated by type, by pressure zone, and, ultimately, by node in the system hydraulic model. Potential non-potable system expansion will be linked to the number of acres of park/golf course acres per pressure zone, to evaluate whether an expanded dual system is feasible. Water system operation criteria will be derived from the data collection phase, and summarized as guidelines for evaluating the existing system, and alternatives for future' expansion. Task 8 Facilities Condition Survey The facilities condition survey will be conducted on two water treatment plants. 17 reservoirs, I I booster pump stations, and 15 wells owned by the City. The following causes of water distribution system deterioration will be reviewed: frozen valves and malfunctioning distribution system components, incompatible and obsolete system components and materials, components and materials that do not meet current codes and trade practices, components and materials that are energy efficient, and components and materials that are difficult to maintain. Coordinate these activities with the consultant selected by the City to replace 20 natural gas drive engines. Task 9 Water Facility Analysis and Evaluation The water facility analysis and evaluation will evaluate potential system deficienciesin four categories; supply, storage, transmission, and delivery pressure. The storage evaluation will include capacity under fire flow, daily fluctuation (including refill), and emergency outage. The well and treatment plant capacities will be evaluated to assess the water supply and the ability to meet projected demands. Pumps and transmission mains will be evaluated for capacity to meet water demands of the distribution system. The system pressures will be evaluated under both peak hour and fire flow plus maximum-day conditions. A hydraulic network model of the Redlands potable and non-potable water conveyance systems will be developed using the EPANET hydraulic modeling program. The EPANET program will be run on a personal computer under both DOS and Microsoft Windows. Distribution System. This task will evaluate the water system's performance and identify deficiencies. An analysis of the physical facilities will be performed for specified present'and future demand conditions. The follo'vving system features will be evaluated: existing pressure zone boundaries; system storage facility capability to replenish and provide water during minimum hour and peak hour, respectively; transmission and distribution pipeline capacity; ability to deliver fire fighting flow for five to ten identified areas selected through consultation with the Fire Department; pump station characteristics, i.e.,pump efficiencies and capacity, and a qualitative overview of surge potential of pump stations. Treatment Plants. For the Tate and Hinckley WTPs,potential improvements may need to be evaluated to meet the future Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule(ESWTR). The ESWTR may require 3- to 6-log removal of Giardia and Cryptosporidium. Other than optimizing the pretreatment processes (coagulation and sedimentation to remove these pathogens), the following physical improvements will be reviewed as potential alternatives to improve particle removal capability of the existing filters: 1) Increasing filter media depth and configurations to improve pathogen removal; 2) Incorporation of filter-to-waste provisions. 3) Addition of polymer to precondition the filter during backwash. The wastewater reclamation facilities at both WTPs will be reviewed for performance. If the effluent from these facilities can not meet the 2 NTU goal. improvements for clarifiers or addition of a coarse filtration process may be recommended. Finally, since free chlorine is not effective in inactivating Cryptosporidium, an alternative disinfectant may be needed. The potential need of using ozone at both WTPs will be evaluated. Plan Formulation and Evaluation Phase At completion of the System Review Phase, current system operations, condition,and deficiencies, and the projected future demands by pressure zone will be defined. Based on those parameters, alternatives for system improvement and expansion will be formulated, reviewed with City staff, and evaluated against a number of criteria in the Plan Formulation and Evaluation Phase. Task 10 Formulate Alternatives A progress meeting with City staff will be conducted to review the identified deficiencies and proposed alternatives. Presentation of the results and identification of alternatives to be evaluated is an important aspect of this stage of the master plan. Proposed alternatives will be superimposed on the GIS database map developed for the existing system, with multiple colors highlighting improvements. Task 11 Evaluate Alternatives The alternatives selected at the meeting with the City will be evaluated to select the preferred alternative. The hydraulic models used to evaluate the existing systems will be expanded to evaluate operation of the proposed alternatives. The following criteria will be used in the evaluation. A least-cost(life cycle) analysis will be prepared. Health Standards. Does the improvement alternative conform with and support applicable health regulations and standards'.) Quantity. Does the improvement alternative result in an adequate amount of future water source? Reliabili . How much increased reliability does the improvement alternative provide the system? Cost. What are the initial and annual capital costs? What are on-going costs for operation and maintenance of the improvement alternative? Flexibily. How well can the improvement alternative respond to changes in land use patterns, water demand projections, resource management decisions, etc.? Can it be phased- in? Implementation. How easy will it be for the improvement alternative to be accepted, designed, constructed, and financed? Is phasing appropriate? Life Expgctanc . How long will the facility last before it needs to be replaced? Risk. What risks are associated with selecting, or not selecting, certain alternatives" Plan Selection Phase Task 12 Select Plan A meeting with City staff will be conducted to review and select the preferred set of improvement alternatives. This meeting provides the City with an opportunity to provide input prior to proceeding with development of the final improvement plan and the implementation Phase. Task 13 Develop Improvement Plan The specific facility improvements selected in Task 12 will be prioritized and staged according to project capacity needs. An upgrade program, including an implementation schedule for the City, will be developed for a 5-year and ultimate planning period. Once the preferred system improvements have been determined, refined order-of-magnitude cost estimates will be developed. A matrix with projects, timelines, cost, and priority ranking criteria will be developed with input from the City. Implementation Phase The implementation phase of the project includes development of an implementation plan and the final project report. Task 14 Implementation Plan The minimum planning period to be considered in the water system plan will be ten years. A definite schedule of improvements will be developed for the first five years,to correspond with the five-year water system plan update. The second five-year(or longer}period will be more general and flexible in scheduling improvements due to less precise growth and financial data. The improvement schedule will be based upon both growth and fixed dates. Improvements based on growth may be undertaken when a specific population or water demand is reached in all or parts of the service area affected by the improvement. Fixed-date scheduling provides information on improvements required for the planning period identified in the water system plan due to facilities age, identified problems, or need to meet regulations. Procedures will be developed for reviewing key water system data to determine when the master plan components and the CIP and project phasing need to be updated. Data collection methods and protocols will be developed to assist the City staff in reviewing operational data and City growth data to determine the need for plan and CIP updates. Task 15 Plan Report The master plan report will be developed incrementally throughout the planning effort. During Task 1,a report outline will be developed for 6ity, comment. As each phase of the plan is completed,draft chapters will be written and presented to the City for review. In Task 15, draft versions of the remaining chapters, and a draft executive summary will be written. These draft chapters will be summarized in a presentation to City staff,I and ten (10) copies provided for City review. After receiving City comments, a final -report will be developed incorporating City comments. Ten (10) copies of the final report will be assembled and delivered to the City. Task 16 CoordinationlReview with Sewer Facilities Master Plan Attend up to three coordination meetings and provide comments on the Sewer Facilities Master Plan being conducted by others. Water System Facilities Master Flan Attachment B Schedule Nark initiates an April 1, 1996 and terminates March 31, 1997. Water System Facilities Master Pian Attachment C Fee The fee for this task order is based on the hourly rates shown in Attachment D and Table C-1. The fee will not exceed $362.900 without prior written approval of the City Project Manager, Water System Facilities Master Plan Attachment D Rate Schedule Classification Hourly rate Professional Grade 7 $168.00 Professional Grade 6 $144.00 Professional Grade 5 $129.00 Professional Grade 4 $114.00 Professional Grade 3 $100.00 Professional Grade 2 $90.00 Professional Grade 1 $83.00 Technician Grade 5 $105.00 Technician Grade 4 $90.00 Technician Grade 3 $79.00 Technician Grade 2 $67.00 Office $50.00 Rates are subject to adjustment on December 25, 1996 ° vtT ° 1< X o s = CIO c < O � p Professional rnC 0C Grade 7 c> Professional t N Grade 6 to ca CX Professional cv ci Grade 5 Professional ts; Grade 4 Professional t o Grade 3 a tp c ,z Professional Grade 2 !s� n � Technician — Grade 5 00 � t GIS/Tech TA o Z Office Total Hours W w t t-j Labor oc n t t9 tJ OC IV- a Ca t Expenses* kA iAvN G? c Sub- Consultants sus N Total Cost � =a 0 0