Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_2-1992_CCv0001.pdf AGREEMENT T4NIS ENGINEERING FS S FOR HINCKLEY AND TATE WATER TREATMENT PLANT SURFACE WATER TREATMENT RULE {SWTR) OPERATION PLANS AMC) PLANT EVALUATIONS This AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this -of cif � 1 by and between City of Redlands Public Work s:Dep rtment hereinafter referred to as OWNER"' and James M. Montgomery,Consulting Engineers, Inc;, hereinafter referred to as"ENGINEER„ In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants`and conditions hereinafter'set forth, the parties do hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 - ENGAGEMENT QF THE ENGINEER 1 .1 The OWNER hereby engages the ENGINEER and the ENGINEER hereby accepts the engagement to perform engineering services required for Surface Water Treatment Rule (SWTR) evaluation of OWNER's Horace Hinckley Water Treatment Plant and Fleury Tate water Treatment Plant and preparation of Operations Plans for each plant, hereinafter referred to as Project. k All services ureter this AGREEMENT shall be done in a professional manner, and ENGINEER represents that the firm employs those with the demonstrated skill and the professional expertise necessary to provide high duality services under this AGREEMENT, 1 .3 The ENGINEER shell be responsible, to the level of competency presently maintained by other practicing professional engineers providing the same type of services, for the professional and technical soundness, accuracy and adequacy of afl reports, designs, drawings, specifications, and other services and materials furnished under this AGREEMENT. 1 ARTICLE 2 - SERVICES OF THE ENGINEER 2.1 The ENGINEER shall perform the services required for the Project as defined in Attachment A, Scope of Work. 2.2 The following additional services may be provided by the ENGINEER when requested and approved by the OWNER and agreed to by the ENGINEER: 9 Obtaining plant operation and performance information required for the Project. • Other services not specified elsewhere in the AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 3 - RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE OWNER 3.1 The OWNER shall place at the disposal of the ENGINEER all available information pertinent to the Project, including previous reports and any other data relative to the Project. 3.2 The OWNER shall provide access to and make all provisions for the ENGINEER to enter upon public and private lands as required for the ENGINEER to perform his services under this AGREEMENT. 3.3 The OWNER shall provide all environmental assessments or impact reports required for this project and not otherwise specifically required to be provided by the ENGINEER. 3.4 The OWNER shall designate in writing a person to act as the OWNER'S representative with respect to the services to be performed under this Agreement, such person to have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define the Owner's policies and decisions with respect to materials, equipment, elements and systems pertinent to the services covered by this AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 4 - PERIOD OF SERVICE 4.1 The ENGINEER shall proceed with the engineering services set forth in Article 2 in accordance with the schedule defined in Attachment B: Schedule. 4.2 The ENGINEER shall proceed with the services under this AGREEMENT promptly and shall prosecute them diligently. 2 ARTICLE 5 - PAYMENTS TO THE ENGINEER 5.1 For the services performed under Article 2, Owner shall pay the ENGINEER on a time and materials basis at the hourly rates shown in Attachment D, Standard Billing Rate Schedule, except as provided herein. The manhour estimates and total project budget are shown in Attachment C, Engineering Services Fee Budget (Fee Proposal). The total amount of compensation for the Project shall not exceed the total shown in Attachment C, Engineering Services Fee Budget (Fee Proposal), unless the scope of the Project is materially changed and agreed to by the Parties. 5.2 Payment for additional services requested by the OWNER per Article 2.2 shall be in accordance with a separately negotiated fee or in accordance with the hourly rates shown in Attachment D: Standard Billing Rate Schedule. 5.3 ENGINEER agrees that at the point 75 percent of budgeted costs have been expended for each scope Project, the ENGINEER will notify the OWNER in writing, including a brief report on job status, percent complete, analysis of budget, and envisioned expenses to complete the contractual effort. The budget shall not be exceeded except if previously approved by OWNER. 5.4 The ENGINEER shall bill the OWNER within ten (10) days following the close of each month by submitting an invoice indicating the work performed, who performed the work, project related direct non-salary costs, and if requested, the detailed cost of all work including back-up documentation. Payments by OWNER to ENGINEER shall be made within 30 days after receipt and approval of ENGINEER'S invoice, by warrant payable to the ENGINEER. OWNER shall notify ENGINEER within seven (7) days of receipt of ENGINEER's invoice if OWNER cannot approve the invoice as submitted. OWNER'S notification to ENGINEER shall include an explanation of deficiencies preventing approval, and means acceptable to OWNER to correct the invoice deficiencies. 5.5 All notices, bills and payments shall be made in writing and may be given by personal delivery or by mail. Notices, bills and payments sent by mail shall be addressed as follows: TO OWNER: CITY OF REDLANDS Gary G. Phelps, Deputy P.W. Director/Utilities P. O. Box 3005 2 E. Citrus Avenue Redlands CA 92373 3 TO ENGINEER: JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. Attn: Dennis M. Smith 301 North Lake Avenue, Suite 600 Pasadena CA 91101 When so addressed, such notices shall be deemed given upon deposit in the United States Mail. In all other instances, notices, bills and payments shall be deemed given at the time of actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names and addresses of the person to whom notices, bills and payments are to be given by giving notice pursuant to this paragraph. ARTICLE 6 - INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION 6.1 ENGINEER shall maintain worker's compensation insurance and, in addition, shall maintain insurance to protect OWNER from claims for damage due to bodily injury, personal injury, or death and claims for injury to or destruction of tangible property while performing the services covered by this AGREEMENT. Said public liability and property damage insurance shall be in a minimum combined single limit of $1,000,000 [and in the aggregate]. The OWNER shall be named a primary additional insured on insurance coverage for public liability and property damage. The ENGINEER shall provide OWNER with a certificate evidencing such insurance coverage. 6.2 ENGINEER agrees to maintain professional liability insurance pursuant to this paragraph to protect OWNER from negligent acts, errors or omissions of a professional nature; the total aggregate of ENGINEER'S professional liability insurance coverage shall be a minimum of $1 ,000,000. 6.3 ENGINEER agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend OWNER and any and all of their elected officials, officers, agents, engineers, and employees from and against all claims, loss, damage, charge or expense, to which they or any of them may be put or subjected to arising out of or resulting from any willful misconduct or negligent act or actions, omission or failure to act on the part of the ENGINEER, his contractors, his suppliers, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts or omissions any of them may be liable in the performance of the services described in this AGREEMENT. 4 ARTICLE 7 - GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 7.1 In the event of any legal action brought by either party against the other to enforce any of the obligations hereunder or arising out of any dispute concerning the terms and conditions hereby created, the losing party shall pay the prevailing party such reasonable amounts for fees, costs, expenses, including attorney's fees, as may be set by the Court. 7.2 The ENGINEER shall not sublet or assign any of the services covered by this AGREEMENT, except with the prior written approval of the OWNER and in strict compliance with the terms, provisions, and conditions of the AGREEMENT. 7.3 The key ENGINEER'S personnel proposed for the Project are as follows: Senior Project Officer - Lee Aldridge Project Manager/Engineer - Dennis M. Smith ENGINEER agrees that these key people shall be made available and assigned to the OWNER'S Project, and that they shall not be replaced without concurrence from the OWNER. 7.4 It is understood and agreed by and between the parties that all documents, records,drawings, designs and specifications, cost estimates, and other project documents developed by the ENGINEER pursuant to this AGREEMENT shall become the property of OWNER and shall be delivered to OWNER upon completion of services. Any reuse of such documents for other projects and any use of incomplete documents shall be at the OWNER'S sole risk. 7.5 ENGINEER is for all purposes an independent contractor. All qualified personnel provided by ENGINEER pursuant to the provisions of this AGREEMENT are to be employed by ENGINEER for his account only, and in no event shall ENGINEER or any personnel retained by him be deemed to have been employed by the OWNER or engaged by the OWNER for the account of or on behalf of the OWNER. 7.6 Unless earlier terminated, as stipulated below, this agreement shall terminate upon completion and acceptance by the OWNER of all services approved for performance under Article 2 of this AGREEMENT. 7.7 This AGREEMENT may be terminated in writing by either party in the event of failure by the other party to fulfill its obligations under this AGREEMENT through no fault of the terminating party: providing, that no such termination may be effected unless the other party is given (1 ) not less than thirty (30) 5 calendar days written notice (delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested) of intent to terminate, and (2) an opportunity for consultation with the terminating party prior to termination. 7.8 If this AGREEMENT is terminated by the OWNER for reasons of default b the ENGINEER, an adjustment to ENGINEER's compensation shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit or unperformed services, and (2) any payment due to the ENGINEER at the time of termination may be adjusted to the extent of any additional costs to the OWNER occasioned by the ENGINEER'S default. If termination for default is effected by the ENGINEER, the adjustment in compensation shall provide for payment to the ENGINEER to include a reasonable profit for services rendered and reimbursement for expenses incurred prior to the termination, in addition to termination settlement costs reasonably incurred by the ENGINEER relating to commitments which had become firm and approved by OWNER prior to the termination. 7.9 Upon receipt of a termination notice, the ENGINEER shall (1) promptly discontinue all services affected (unless the notice directs otherwise), and (2) deliver or otherwise make available to the OWNER, copies of data, design calculations, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries, and such other information and materials as may have been accumulated by the ENGINEER in performing services under this AGREEMENT. 7.10 ENGINEER shall maintain books and accounts of all project related payroll costs and all expenses and incidental expense. Books shall be available at all reasonable times for examination by the OWNER at the office of the ENGINEER. 7.11 This AGREEMENT, including attachments incorporated herein by reference, represents the entire AGREEMENT and understanding between the parties and any negotiations, proposals or oral agreements are intended to be integrated herein and to be superseded by this written AGREEMENT. Any supplement or amendment to this AGREEMENT to be effective shall be in writing and signed by the OWNER and ENGINEER. 7.12 This AGREEMENT shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of the parties have signed in confirmation of this AGREEMENT. CITY OF REDLANDS JAMES M . MONTGOMERY , CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. B ByyZee�Ip r CHOLED IR J LEE ALDRIDGE aYor Vice President ATTEST: C ty ;Ier , City of P a ds 7 ATTACHMENT A TO AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HINCKLEY AND TATE WTP SWTR OPERATION PLANS AND PLANT EVALUATIONS SCOPE OF WORK The Scope of Work for the Project was developed to respond to the results of a California Department of Health Services(DOHS's) survey of OWNER's Horace Hinckley Water Treatment Plant (WTP) and Henry Tate WTP mandated by the State of California's Surface Water Filtration and Disinfection Treatment Regulations (SWFDTR). The findings of DOHS's survey of OWNER's two water treatment plants is contained in an October 22, 1991 letter to the OWNER. The following is a description of the Scope of Work tasks required to prepare the plant Operation Plans required by the SWFDTR and to respond to DOHS's survey findings. The Scope of Work tasks are as follows: Task 1: Project Management and Meetinjzs This task involves ENGINEER's management of the project technical work activities, project administration activities and the attendance of ENGINEER's project staff at the project kickoff meeting, and other meetings with the city's project staff and DOHS at key points during the conduct of the project work. ENGINEERS's project staff will attend the project kickoff meeting with OWNER that will conclude with a visit to both of the water treatment plants. The purpose of the project kickoff meeting will be, as a minimum, to: • Introduce OWNER/ENGINEER project team members. • Discuss the project work objectives and scope of work requirements. • Establish project contract administration and technical information contact protocols. Review project technical information and data needs. • Discuss alternatives to be considered to mitigate the DOHS-identified plant deficiencies. Establish DOHS interface protocols. Page 1 of 6 In addition to the project kick-off meeting, the ENGINEER's project personnel will participate in up to seven meetings covering the following items: • Meet with OWNER's project staff to brain storm the incorporation of the SWFDTR regulation HPC sampling requirements into OWNER's existing distribution system disinfection residual monitoring plan. • Meet with OWNER's project staff to review comments on the proposed HPC sampling revisions to the distribution system disinfection residual monitoring plan. • Meet with OWNER's project to present and discuss the evaluation results and recommendations for the correction of the DOHS-identified plant deficiencies. • Meet with OWNER's project staff to review comments on the draft versions of the two plant engineering reports. • Meet with OWNER's project staff and DOHS to review DOHS's plant engineering report review comments. • Meet with OWNER's project to review comments on the draft versions of the two plant Operations Plans (one meeting). • Meet with OWNER's project staff and DOHS to review DOHS's comments on the plant Operations Plans (one meeting). Task 2: Review and Compile Information and Data Under this task, ENGINEER will review OWNER's existing distribution system disinfection residual monitoring plan, and will review and compile the other plant operational information (provided by OWNER) for use in evaluating plant deficiency corrective actions and inclusion in the plant Operations Plans. ENGINEER will also review the operation and maintenance manuals for both plants, as applicable, for information pertinent to the Project work. Confirmation of the accuracy of the plant facilities, process and equipment redundancies and monitoring and alarm capabilities information incorporated into the Operations Plans will be required. This task therefore includes a maximum of two engineering person days to field check the information and data vs. actual conditions at both water treatment plants. Task 3: Revise Disinfection Residual Monitoring Plan for HPC Sampling Requirements Based on the outcome of the meeting with OWNER's project staff to brain storm the incorporation of the SWFDTR HPC sampling requirements into OWNER's existing distribution system disinfection residual monitoring plan, ENGINEER will update the plan so that it will be in conformance with the SWFDTR regulations. Two draft versions of the updated plan will be Page 2 of 6 submitted to OWNER for review and comment. The final version of the updated plan will be incorporated into the two plant Operations Plans, and two final version copies of the plan will be provided to OWNER. Task 4: Prepare Plant Operations Plans At the request of DOHS, separate Operations Plans will be prepared for the Horace Hinckley Water Treatment Plant (WTP) and Henry Tate WTP. The Operations Plans will contain the plant operation and monitoring information and data required by DOHS. As a minimum, DOHS requires a description of the following items be included in the water treatment plant Operations Plan: 1. Names,grades,operator certification number and phone numbers(home and work) of all plant operations personnel. 2. Raw water monitoring schedule. 3. Frequency of grab sample monitoring and the points in the treatment process where the samples are to be taken. A schedule for the following grab sample monitoring are to be included: a. Turbidity b. pH C. Temperature d. Chlorine residual e. Coliform bacteria f. Plate counts 9. Other 4. A plan for monitoring disinfectant contact time and determining log inactivation of viruses and Giardia. S. A plan for monitoring the distribution system for chlorine residual and plate counts. 6. A summary of the continuous monitoring, alarms and automatic shutdown capabilities. 7. Increased monitoring that may be provided as an alternative reliability feature. 8. Standardization procedures for all monitoring equipment. Page 3 of 6 9. Methods for determining appropriate chemical dosages including jar test procedures. 10. Procedures for adjustment of chemical dosages and methods of accurately monitoring chemical feed equipment. 11. Points of application and concentrations of all chemicals fed on a regular basis. 12. Additional chemical feed capability. 13. Start-up and shut-down procedures. 14. A summary of the flow variations through the plant and the hours the plant is operated. This should include the proposed maximum flow through the plant and address the maximum filtration rates. 15. Frequency of backwash, criteria for length of filter runs, and filter backwash procedures. 16. A description of the treatment and, detention time provided for solids removal for recycled backwash water. 17. Dates, frequency and procedure for filter media inspection and replacement. 18. A summary of the operating records maintained. 19. A description of how and when each unit process is operated. This should include any special action taken to compensate for design deficiencies. 20. Preventative maintenance program. 21. A summary of the supply of chemicals available for use. 22. Names and addresses of chemical and equipment suppliers whose products are used regularly. 23. Frequency and dates of clearwell cleaning activities. 24. Emergency response plan for treatment plant and watershed emergencies. 25. Emergency plan for disinfection failure. The plant Operations Plans will include Items 1 through 23 and Item 25. The emergency response plan for treatment plant and watershed emergencies will be responded to separately by Page 4 of 6 OWNER. Item 5 will include OWNER's existing plan, modified to include HPC sampling location and frequency requirements. Item 25 will reflect OWNER's current emergency plans for disinfection system failure at both plants. To the extent possible, the Operations Plans will reference the plant operation and maintenance manual, and equipment user manuals kept on file at the plants. The plant Operation Plans will be prepared in a three-ring binder format. Two preliminary draft version copies of the plans for each plant will be submitted to OWNER for review and comment. Three draft versions of the plans will be provided to OWNER for submittal to DOHS. Five final version copies of each plant plan will be provided to OWNER. Task 5: Plant Deficiency Evaluations ENGINEER will evaluate the alternatives available to OWNER to correct the DOHS-identified deficiencies at both water treatment plants so that they will be in compliance with the SWFDTR regulations. In DOHS's October 22, 1991 letter, they identified specific deficiencies at each plant that corrective measures will have to be addressed under this task. The DOHS-identified deficiencies to be evaluated by ENGINEER will include: • Maintenance of a minimum 0.2 mg/I disinfection residual in the water delivered to the distribution system. Deficiency at both plants. • Lack of filter-to-waste capability for the filters. Deficiency at both plants. • Lack of adequate alarm provisions to warn of coagulant dosage failure. Deficiency at both plants. • Inability to achieve the required 0.5 log disinfection inactivation for Giardia cysts. Deficiency at the Henry Tate WTP. • Inability of the filters to meet the effluent turbidity requirements of Section 64660 (b)(6)(B) of the regulations. This is a deficiency at the Henry Tate WTP and may be a problem at the Horace Hinckley WTP. The level of effort for the evaluation of the plant deficiencies is difficult to estimate since DOHS can stipulate compliance requirements in addition to those required by the regulations. ENGINEER's maximum budget for this task effort has been established at $5,590. Task 6: Prepare Engineering Reports ENGINEER will prepare separate engineering reports for each of OWNER's water treatment plants as requested by DOHS. The engineering reports will describe how the plant DOHS- identified deficiencies will be brought into compliance with the SWFDTR regulations, and Page 5 of 6 present a schedule for achieving compliance. ENGINEER will develop the document content format with DOHS for the letter-type reports. The engineering reports will be prepared on OWNER's letterhead for submittal to DOHS. Two draft version copies of each plant engineering report will be submitted to OWNER for review and comment. One final version and two copies of each plant engineering report will be provided to OWNER for submittal to DOHS and for project record. CITY-FURNISHED ITEMS AND RESPONSIBILITIES The engineering services Scope of Work and associated fee is predicated on OWNER providing ENGINEER with the following items that are needed to complete the Project work: • Operation and maintenance manuals for each of the plants. • Plant raw and treated water quality information based on a needs list developed by ENGINEER. • Plant operation, monitoring and alarm information based on a needs list developed by ENGINEER. • Distribution system disinfection residual monitoring plan. OWNER to provide ENGINEER with diskette copy of the plan in WordPerfect IBM-compatible format, if available. • Emergency chlorination plan for each plant. In addition to the above, OWNER will also submit a letter to DOHS requesting a delay in the submittal of the Operations Plans and engineering reports as outlined in Attachment B to the Agreement. The completion deadlines for the plant Operation Plans and the engineering reports are regulatory agency mandated.Accordingly, a timely response on the part of OWNER in providing the above- listed information is essential. If ENGINEER has to become involved in obtaining the above- listed information, such involvement shall be considered supplemental engineering services in addition to the basic engineering services covered by the fee. Page 6 of 6 ATTACHMENT B TO AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HINCKLEY & TATE WTP SWTR OPERATION PLANS AND PLANT EVALUATIONS SCHEDULE The California Department of Health Services (DOHS) has established deadlines for submittal of the Operations Plans and engineering reports for both of OWNER's plants in their October 22, 1991 letter to OWNER. The deadline for submittal of the draft version of the Operations Plan for each plant is December 2, 1991, and the deadline for submittal of the plant engineering reports is January 24, 1992. OWNER has submitted a letter to DOHS requesting a submittal delay for the draft versions of the plant Operations Plans until January 15, 1992. Both ENGINEER and OWNER agree that the Operation Plan deadline cannot be met due to the start date for the Project work, and it will be difficult to meet the engineering report deadline due to the time required by OWNER to provide the plant information and data required by ENGINEER for the Project work, the concurrent work activities between the plant Operations Plans and engineering reports, and the effort required to complete the plant Surface Water Filtration and Disinfection Treatment Regulations evaluations. ENGINEER has discussed this concern with DOHS, and they are agreeable to delaying the submittal deadlines for both documents. Based on the forgoing, ENGINEER and OWNER agree that both deadlines need to be delayed further to produce plant Operations Plans and engineering reports responsive to DOHS requirements that also protect the interests of OWNER. Accordingly, OWNER will submit a letter to DOHS requesting a further delay in the submittal of the Operations Plans for both plants until April 10, 1992, and a delay in the submittal of the engineering reports for both plants until May 29, 1992. The schedule to complete the Project work is presented below. The schedule is predicated on the OWNER submitting the request to DOHS to delay the draft version submittal of the Operations Plans for both plants until April 10, 1992, and to delay the submittal of the plant engineering reports until May 29, 1992. The Project Schedule shall be as follows, based on receipt of notice to proceed with Project no later than January 8, 1992, and the OWNER providing plant information required for Project within three weeks of issuance of the notice to proceed: Plant Operation Plans Complete the Preliminary Draft Version of Plans March 13, 1992 OWNER Complete Review of Preliminary Draft Plan March 27, 1992 Versions Page 1 of 2 Submit Draft Plan Versions to OWNER April 8 , 1992 Complete and Submit Final Versions of the Plans Within Two Weeks to OWNER Receipt of DOHS Comments Plant Engineering Rep" Complete Plant Deficiency Evaluations and Present April 17, 1992 Recommendations to the OWNER Complete Preliminary Draft Versions of the Reports May 1, 1992 OWNER Complete Review of Preliminary Draft May 15, 1992 Versions of Report Submit Draft Versions of Reports to OWNER May 27, 1992 Complete and Submit Final Versions of the Reports Within Two Weeks of to the OWNER Receipt of DOHS Comments. Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT C TO AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HINCKLEY AND TATE WTP SWTR OPERATION PLANS AND PLANT EVALUATIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES FEE BUDGET(FEE PROPOSAL) PAGE IOF2 uper. Sr. Assist. SCO Prof_ Prof. Prof Prof. Prof. Designer Assist. Secretary Typist Subtotal Task Task Descri ion as t Management&migs A.Pro' t mina ement A Admin. 16 30 1 16 7 772 H.Kickoff Meaft I. C.Other Meetings(7 @ 5 Hrs.Each) 35 35 10 Task 2 Review dt Com ile Info.&Dns A.Review&Compile Data Hinkle WTP 6 S420 ate 5. ant Dau Verification Task evise Disinfection Residual Moniuming an for HPC SmPs. Task 4 E=e PLad ons Plan A. inc! 4 B. its WrP 6 0 16 $7,152 ask 5 Plant Deficiency Evalunkm A.Hinckley W1rP 4 16 ], B.Tate WTP 4 6 32 $3.636 Task 6 ftEM EginceringReports A.Hinckley WTP 1 4 8 4 $1,288 Tne WWF 1 6 12 1 6 1,432 Labor Totals 22 1 109 0 0 293 0 0 1 12 58 1 0 1 0 $41,828 Legend: SCO- Senior Company Officer Prof.- Professional Princ.Prof.- Principal Professional Assist.Prof.- Assistant Professional Super.Prof.- Supervising Professional Admin.Assist.- Administrative Assistant Sr.Prof.- Senior Professional Reprod.Typist- Reproduction Typist ATTACHMENT C TO AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HINCKLEY AND TATE WTP SWTR OPERATION PLANS AND PLANT EVALUATIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES FEE BUDGET(FEE PROPOSAL) PAGE 2 OF 2 Direct Non-Salarl Costs Unit Extend Cost Description Units No. Cast Cast Subtotal eleprone or, f �+ 2.Local P Wa-ge SO-29 $560 a] ( C'pOdt1(:t1an = �- FS��:?• �'�i`^.: Yy�"�=-'�"✓+:i�i'...t."y:� > 4.Special Postage Each 1 1 AD $19 Vii;;•'i:t;';.: �f 5.Computer Charges 't. ' 8 Hr. n $14.00 $880 i' 'Each 5 9. 7. on Fhm Reproduction 3.tzgmecring Report Reproduction lace armo }i: £+c"' :,7�. .Flo •�.:..:,; ..... _.._ _ 'ter";~ _ -:�:;:;?:. '::Yy ;K:,:s::i!'':� ••?•k>. ...... an- oW 1.1S Marked-Up NonSsx wal ITUTALESTMATEI)FEE1100 ATTACHMENT D TO AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR HINCKLEY & TATE WTP SW I`R OPERATION PLANS AND PLANT EVALUATIONS JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. STANDARD BILLING RATE SCHEDULE Senior Company Officer $155 per hour Principal Professional $136 per hour Supervising Professional $101 per hour Senior Professional $86 per hour Professional $70 per hour Associate Professional $56 per hour Assistant Professional $42 per hour Senior Designer $75 per hour Designer $57 per hour Drafter $35 per hour Senior Resident Engineer $89 per hour Resident Engineer-Inspector $61 per hour Administration Assistant $53 per hour Secretary $46 per hour Reproduction Typist I P $45 per hour Clerk $31 per hour The individual hourly rates includes salary. overhead. and profit Other direct non-salary expenses are to be billed at actual cost plus an administrative w markup of 15 percent. Direct non-salary expenses shall include such items as telephone call costs, document reproduction charges, local mileage. FAX charges, special and regular postage charges, computer charges, etc.