HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_69-96_CCv0001.pdf AGREEMENT TO FURNISH
LANDFILL GAS ENGINEERING AND MONITORING SERVICES
FOR CALIFORNIA STREET LANDFILL
This Agreement is made and entered into this 16th day of July, 1996 by and between the City of
Redlands, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") and Gas Control Engineering, Inc.,
(hereinafter"Engineer").
In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, City and
Engineer hereby agree as follows:
ARTICLE I - IGAGEME—N--T—O—F ENGINEER
1.1 City hereby engages Engineer, and Engineer hereby accepts the engagement, to perform
onitorina services (the "Services") for the City's California
landfill gas engineering and in
Street Landfill (the"Project").
1.2 The Services shall be performed by Engineer in a professional manner, and Engineer
represents that it has the skill and the professional expertise necessary to provide high quality
Services for the Project at the level of competency presently maintained by other practicing
professional consultants in the industry providing similar types of services.
ARTICLE 2 - SERVICES OF CONSULTANT
2.1 The specific Services which Engineer shall perform are more particularly described in
Attachment "A," entitled "Scope of Work and Schedule," which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
ARTICLE 3 -RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY
3.1 City shall make available to Engineer information in its possession that is pertinent to the
performance of Engineer's Services.
12 City will provide access to and make provisions for Engineer to enter upon City-owned
property as required by Engineer to perform the Services.
c as its representative with
3
1.3 City designates Valorie Shatynski, Solid Wast Manager, to act
respect to the Services to be performed under this Agreement.
ARTICLE 4 - PERIOD OF SERVICE
4.1 Engineer shall perform the Services in a diligent manner and in accordance with the
schedule set forth in Attachment A.
I
Affg.aat
ARTICLE 5 - PAYMENTS TO THE CONSULTANT
5.1 The total compensation for Engineer's performance of the Services shall not exceed$65,124.
City shall pay Engineer on4a time and materials basis at the hourly rates shown in
Attachment B -Fee Proposal and Fee Schedule.
5.2 Engineer shall bill City within ten days following the close of each month by submitting an
invoice indicating the Services performed, who performed the Services, indirect costs, and
the detailed cost of all Services including backup documentation. Payments by City to
Envineer shall be made within 3)0 days after receipt and approval of Engineer's invoice, by
warrant payable to Engineer.
Z:�
5.3 All contractual notices, bills and payments shall be made,in writing and may be given by
personal delivery or by mail. Notices,bills and payments sent by mail shall be addressed as
follows:
C& Engineer
Valorie Shatynski Alan Janecheck, P.E.
Municipal Utilities Department 1205 North Red Gum Street
35 Cajon Street Suite B
P. O. Box 3005 Anaheim, CA 92806
Redlands,CA 9237')
When so addressed, such notices shall be deemed given upon deposit in the United States
Mail. In all other instances, notices,bill and payments shall be deemed given at the time of
actual delivery. Changes may be made in the names and addresses of the person to whom
notices,bills, and payments are to be given by giving notice pursuant to this paragraph.
ARTICLE 6 - INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
6.1 Engineer shall maintain worker's compensation insurance and, in addition, shall maintain
insurance to protect City from claims for damage due to bodily injury.personal injury and
death, and claims for injury to or destruction of tangible property while performing the
Services required by this Agreement. Said public liability and property damage insurance
shall be in a minimum combined single limit of$1.000,006, and in the aggregate. Engineer
shall maintain comprehensive automobile liability insurance with a combined single limit
of$1,000,000 for bodily injury and property damage. Engineer shall maintain professional
liability insurance in the aggregate amount of$1,000,000 with a minimum of$500,000 per
occurrence. City shall benamed as an additional insured under all policies for public
liability,property damage and comprehensive automobile liability and professional liability
insurance,and such insurance shall be primary with respect to City and non-contributing to
anv insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City. Engineer shall provide City with
certificates of insurance evidencing such insurance coverage prior to commencing the
2
A:Ifg.agt
Services.
6.2 Engineer shall Indemnify,hold harmless and defend City and its elected officials, officers,
agents and employees from and against all claims, loss, damage, charges or expense, to
which it or any of them may be put or subjected to the extent that they arise out of or result
from any willful or negligent act or actions, omission or failure to act on the part of the
Engineer,its contractors,its suppliers,anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them
or anyone for whose acts or omissions any of them maybe liable in the performance of the
Services required by this Agreement.
ARTICLE 7 - GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
TI In the event any action is commenced to enforce or interpret any of the terms or conditions
of this Agreement the prevailing party shall, in addition to any costs and other relief, be
entitled to the recovery of its reasonable attorneys' fees.
7.2 Engineer shall not assign any of the Services required by this Agreement,except with the
prior written approval of City and in strict compliance with the terms, provisions and
conditions of this Agreement.
7.31 Engineer's key personnel for the Project are: Alan Janecheck - Project Manager, Kenneth
Holman,Jannette Napoles-Field Technicians. Engineer agrees that the key personnel shall
be made available and assigned to the Project, and that they shall not be replaced without
concurrence from City.
7.4 All documents, records, drawings, designs, costs estimates, electronic data files and
databases and other Project documents developed by the Engineer pursuant to this
Agreement shall become the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon completion
of the Services or upon the request of City. Any reuse of such documents for other projects
and any use of incomplete documents will be at City's sole risk.
7.5 Engineer is for all purposes an independent contractor. All personnel employed by Engineer
are for its account only, and in no event shall Engineer or any personnel retained by it be
deemed to have been employed by City or engaged by City for the account of or on behalf
of City.
7.6 Unless earlier terminated, as provided for below, this Agreement shall terminate upon
completion and acceptance by City of the Services.
7.7 This Agreement may be terminated by either paxty, without cause,by providing thirty (30)
days prior written notice to the other(delivered by certified mail,return receipt requested)
of intent to terminate.
3
A:Ifo,.agt
7.8 If this Agreement is terminated by City, an adjustment to Engineer's compensation shall be
made,but(1)no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit or unperformed services, and
(2) any payment due Engineer at the time of termination may be adjusted to the extent of
any additional costs to City occasioned by any default by Engineer.
7.9 Upon receipt of a termination notice, Engineer shall (t) promptly discontinue all services
affected.and(2)deliver or otherwise make available to City,copies (in both hard copy and
electronic form, where applicable), of any data, design calculations, drawings,
specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and such other information and materials as
may have been accumulated by Engineer in performing the Services required by this
Agreement.
7.10 Engineer shall maintain books vaiand accounts of all Project related ampayroll costs and all
expenses. Such books shall be alable all reasonable at times for exination by the City
at the office of Engineer.
7.11 This Agreement, including the attachments incorporated herein by reference, represents the
entire agreement and understanding between the parties and any prior negotiations,proposals
or oral agreements are superseded by this Agreement. Any amendment to this Agreement
shall be in writing, approved by the City Council of City and signed by City and Engineer;
provided,however,farther City Council approval shall not be required for any amendment
to this Agreement which increases the scope of Services for a cost not to exceed$5,000.
7.12 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State
of California.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,,duly authorized representatives of the City and Engineer have signed in
confirmation of this Agreement.
City of Redlands Gas Control Engineering,Inc.
Ccityll) ("Engineer")
S I
Ey: r
SAN LN RICHARD W. PROSSER,P.E.
Mayor President
ATTEST:
C
City
12
e r
k,City(o e lands
4
Affga
ATTACHMENT A
SCOPE OF WORK.AND SCHEDULE
i
SCOPE OF WORK
1,0 PROJECT APPROACH
aeh to this project and a project
The purpose of this section is to describe GCS's appy,..
ill benefit the City of Redlands in the following ways:
mat�agemcnt style that w
I. Reduction of monitoring costs and frequency through negotiation with SCAQNTID
oacf t
for a common-sense apprto compliance°ands reduction of v dose nol
Zone and groundwater
0
Operations procedures targeted
contamination by LFG
3. Utilize a rigorous QA�`QC program to provide accurate and competent data.
d. Responsive project management and coordination according to the City's needs'
t,1 Regulatory Negotiation
f the City
at the. direction of the City, will serve as the primary negotiator on ne otf o ng reductions
GCE, �,Ip GCE staff have extensive experience g
p
act as liaison with the SCAQ by
in Rule 1150.1 monitoring requirements the intenThese tof 1150 1uctions w Ab n Jant achieved
'Manager of
common sense alternatives which support
cgo with
CAQMD for reduced monitoring
Riverside County's Environmentat Division, neto iation�efe e are shown n Table I.I.
requirements at 11 landfills. Several Site specificg
This table includes negotiated 1150.1 requirements o d P reduced n onetoximatcost saysng The best waw
owner./operators either tluough reduced O&M costs
that reductions can be achieved are by demonstrating a strate tooactive response to SCAQMD throughphis aric�l data
history of compliance. In other words, demon will act to prevent
sua1nlary, dCmoastratiOn of procedures, and communication that the City
compliance violations.
Table 1.1
SITE SPECIFIC NEGOTIATION TABLE
SCAQNIA RULE 1150.1
-y: N is ,
.ISS and Ambient over areas>50 PPM537,0001year
West Riverside Landfill from 35m only instead of entire
City of Riverside landitll. Reduced ISM and gm,
SIM lin • u:rements 1 ear
I:vsssber of required praEss reduesd 511,0 1y
car
Landfill , d probe manitorinE fi- rneY
Cita of Elsinore reduced from monthly to quarterly.
ear
Corona Landfill ISS and Aretbient over areas>50 PPM $1 5,000'y
from 35NI only instead of entire
City of Corona Isadf ll. Reduced ISM and gas
Sxrn lin uiremcnts.
1.2 Groundwater Protection
OCE has been an industry leader in the design and operation of landfill gas collection ystems to
control VOC contamination of groundwater. Richard Prosser, proposed Project Prsincipal and
Alan Tanechek,proposed Project,Manager, have authored two published papers On the effects of
I_FG and groundwater contamination.
The approach to reducing the amount of contamination reaching groundwater and he
-eZone is to limit the causes of LFG migration, which are convei�tiion(differences in presure) and
-
di(Tusion(differences in conceatratiO4 Njost LFG collection systems are designed and operated
to control convection, but not diffusion. The effects cts of the diffusion mechanism can be reduce I d
through changes in both the design and the Operation of the collection SN'Stem.
Changes to the design of the collection system would normally consist Of increasing and
the
collection area to include the entire bottom Of the landfill, and the vadoze zone Wow
surrounding the landfill. The California sLrcet landfill,stemuslt�s
lmopportunities to expand the coverage oft1le collection sypossible that sweep air well"
could be installed at portions of the landfill's Perimeter to enhance diffusion control. The
cost/benefit of this Option would be presented to the City as part of the operations report.
Changes to the operation of the systlem can also be used to reduce the potential for groundwater
contamination. GCE uses two we!I adjustment prod dures to improve the efficiency Of the
migration potential and the effects of diffusion- The two
collection system, thereby reducing e. The first method, methane targeti"g-, is 11d
adjuson
tment procedures are both based on flow rat irigis used on perimeter
on interior wells. The second method, residual nitrogen targ -,
targeting ailows t�lie operator to increase the flow rate of wells
The residual nitrogen, or R-N,,targ g the risk of refuse fires. The method uses a
located in limited or no refuse, while reducing
f air infiltration into the well and uses this estimate as a basis
calculation to estimate the amount o ne, GCE fias used these methods
for well adjustment instead of methane concentration alio
ve collection of LFG are essential
effectively at other sites. proper well adjustment and aggressi
to-controlling migration to groundwater and the vadose zone.
OCE has extensive experience working with the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control
�
Board (SAR'NQCFl). Alan Janechek, as former manager of Riverside County Waste
Management's Environmental Division, negotiated with SARWQCB to use LFG c;ollectio
means to control groundwater contamination. Through this negotiation, SARWQCB agreed to
abandon requirements for a pump-and-treat system at the Mead Valley Landfill in Perris,
California. instead a LFG collection system was designed U) target VOC contamination of
groundwater.
1.3 Project Coordination
Project coordination is an extremely important aspect of this project. it is essential that our
activities on the landfill not interfere with landfill operations and that a schedule be prepared and
11rij,,trd in that('irif itaff arf-3wirr of mir nlanad AftiYiTiirIi,
it not procee(I watt maintenance or engineering work VULZjIUC UX !iUVPC UL U'C "t"I
WI e successfully coordinated out of
t and approval from the City. We have
until we receive mpu
scope work on other projects by using work approva
I forms. These forms,which list the work to
be performed, materials to be used and labor requirements, are used to follow up on phone
conversations of recommended repair or maintenance work and formally request approval Of the
pe of format allows us to quickly respond to the City's needs
worn
before proceeding. This ty,
while still assuring proper con,irnuricatiOn-
Coordination between our Project Manager and field technicians will also be operating; LFG
ant. Alan
janechek, project Manager for this project, has extensive hands-on experience oper
collection systems. He will be in daily communication with the field techwcian staff and
provide direction on adjustments,troubleshooting and repair,;-
1.4 Nitaititaining COMP"ance
of this project is to maintain regulatory compliance within SCAQMD and
The primary objective I to take a proactive approach to operation of the LFG
SARWQCB. The best way to do this is
collection system. Ve will not wait until a violation or near violation occurs before taking
action. For the perimeter monitoring -probes we will target all ISM readings to addtens
less than 10
through onal cover
ppm measured as methane. maintaining ISM readings, below 10 rpm (
will be the best way to eliminate or reduce requirement-; fear ISS- For
or well adjustments)
monitoring probes,eve will target all probes to be less than 0.5% methane. We will also target
e concentrations of VoCs using the procedures described
adjustments to reduce vadose zon
previously.
Monitoring data will also be collected under worst case conditions, normally in the afternoon
during rising barometric pressure, if wind speeds allow. This will allow for system adjustments
based Oa the worst case conditions and also help to avoid incidences of regulatory staff
measuring levels higher than the operators.
1.5 Recommendations
0u; recommendation is to reduce the frequency of monitoring to a level that makes sense for a
landfill of this size. Specific recommendations for each task reduction are based on our past
e- negotiating common sense requirements with SCAQMD. The best approach for
�pe-,iencc in
this is to propose a performance based compliance plan. The performance based plan would set
a minimum baseline rnanitoring schedule. Additional -monitoring tasks and monitoring
frequency would be added in the event that certain limits are exceeded. The proposed base
ek
lin
schedule would rely primarily On routine perimeter probe and ISM monitoring. Additional tass
and frequency would be added if any probe exceeded 5% methane or any ISM reading exceeded
5o ppm. This would provide incentive to operate the system below these limits in order to avoid
farther monitoring requirements and provide a m. cans for the City to assess the performance Of
GCE. The following compliance plan is the plan we would recommend be proposed to
SCAQMD. The plan structure is similar to plans approved previously by sCAQMD-
Recommended Compliance Plan
ISIN-1 To be conducted monthly over the entire landfill surface
ISS = To be conducted only over any single point ISM reading exceeding 500 PPM
c 50 ppm trigger would be
which time
(SCAQMD may not accept this limit at
N
N
proposed). ISS would be conducted over the entire landfill surfaee only in the event
any of the previously collected ISS samples exceeds 50 ppm (a remote possibility, as
ISS samples tend to be much less than the ISM reading*,ager that Area. for example,
our experience is that an area of the landJll with an ISNI reading of 500 ppm will
likely have an ISS sample nitich less than 50 ppm).
3. ISM Over Active fill Area -To be conducted monthly.
4. Ambient Air Sampling To be conducted only when ISS is performed. IV will
5. Landfill Gas Sampling terly (SCAQN1D historicall,
To be conducted quar
not reduce this to less than,quarterly).
6. Perimeter Probe Monitoring - To be monitored "1011tiliv for percent methane,
percent carbon dioxide, percent LFL, percent oxygen, and in. w.c. pressure (this is
more frequent than stated in the RFP, but is recommended to aid in well adjustment
procedures). Sainpies will be collected for tab analysis quarterly at any prol-,,P3
exceeding 5%methane. A minimum of one probe sample will be collected quarterly
if no probes exceed 5% methane. Samples collected will be analyzed for 1150.1
core group compounds,TOCYNN114C.and major gases.
L6 Quality Assurance/Quality Control
An important capability offered by GCE is it's rigorous QA.IQC prcigrarn to maintain data
integrity. Tl e City, and the gas collection system operators must have confidence that the
compliance monitoring data is valid and accurately reflects landfill conditions.
Quality management is maintained from data collection through data input into the database.
The procedures include:
• Technician training to verify that they are qualified and knowledgeable for
the job. plans.
• Implementation of approved sampling
• Pre and post instrument calibration on,a daily basis
• Periodic management review of procedures used for collected data.
t R'atfllli�liillldi �i �i1� iftS )ivl
YH
Re,' data.
"Wipline
w1d 111,juitof�Ig to vtrify erroneous
By using these simple procedures,the value of the data is enhanced by making it reliable.
2.0 PROPOSAL INFORMATION
2.1 Proposed Scope of Work
This section provides a breakdown of each task by labor hours and labor type. The breakdown is
based on our recommended monitoring plan described in Section I.S. This recommended plan
includes probe monitoring to be conducted monthly instead of quarterly, which is reflected in
this labor breakdown.
The recommended plan proposes to eliminate the requirements for routine ISS. The labor
breakdown for each of the ISS scenarios described in the RFP is included for reference-
Senior staff Tech. Clerical Totals
Prof. Prof. 9 Hours
Billing Rate 1 89 '79 40
I NJ -ITORLNG SERV'IC'ES VVI 1. 0 5.0 0 5.0
Instantaneous Surface'i'vicnitorint'! 0
1,0 last .5 0 3 6.0 0
36.5
1 ISS r-,ntire Landfill Surface
Za
- ISS - It' of Grid Areas 5.5
2b A .5 0 5.0 V
'Ic IS 6 Grids 0 4'.0 0 2.0
0
3,0 ISINI in Active Area 0 2.0 0 2.0
4.0 Ambient Air Sarnpling 0 0 1.0 0 1 1.0
5.0 Landfill Gas Sampling .5 0 -0 0 3.5
6.0 Perimeter Probe Monitoring
i.0 0 12.0 0 13,0
7 () 'Well, onitoring 0 0 0 Q 0
8,o Flare Testing 2.0 00 0 2,0
9.0 Assistance with Agency Negotiations3.0 • 0 6.0
10-0 Quarterly Reporting
Schedule
r
Proposed Schedule v
(Assumed startup date of July 1, 1996 per RFP)
r
��t r, �.=st;rE�i.i;Y-' t'x-•�.r�:_� , �'irr�; c� �:.;3��F ;�'►;{ ieOr�.�13 r ;.,• „� . F .� °�3t , 02cx j� �r+,•. ,: ^':e :t:<i:. �N
•�. ,1' r :[ ;i C : i 1.'.`�`S:;� f�+�xi?! '��` t�yir.`', 'a: .f:. ?` !a �?+� ! .•" �'_ 49
- f
1154.1 Monitoring X X X
Collection System Adjustrnents X X X X X X
Monthly Mcmo X X `-
1
SCAQMD Quarterly Report Draft X
to City r
r
Lab Analysis Results to GCE X X X
SCAQMD Report Final to X X
SCAQMD, City i
Source'rest Conducted X
Source Test Submittal to X
SCAQMD
c
{Months 4 through 12 will resat the routine shown in months I through 3 except for source test_ f
,
4
L
h
Q
gcelOPropasaltR4dlan4s196-Ife2tRc�rscepe.dnc
ATTACHMENT B
FEE PROPOSAL AND FEE SCHEDULE
A:ff,-,agt
FEEPROPOSAL
City cT RedU.*
FATE: 30J-98
-s;cE�svR�awoswuA�oun°�sie�cosT.xLr
CALIFORNIA STREET LANDFILL
DETAILED LABOR 81 S G BREAKDOWN
RABIC SENIOR STAFF ASST. CWEMFTECH. CLONCL. ENOR. TOTAL,
EN" PROF. PROP. PROF. ASST. HOURS
BILLBIG RATE 111 89 78 57 50. 40 39 37
ASK
A MONITORING SERVICES
IG INSTANTANEOUS SURFACE MOMTORING 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5.0
2. ISS=ENTIRE LANDFRI SURFACE 0 0.5 0 0 0 38 0 0 38.5
2b IS =1'4 Of GRID AREAS 0 0.5 0 0 0 10 0 0 10.5
2e ISS,8 GRIDS 0 0.5 0 0 0 5 0 0 5.5
3.0 ISM IN ACTIVE AREA 0 01 0 4 0 2 O 0 2.0
4.0 AMBIENT AIR SAMPLING 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2.0
5.0 LANDFILL,GAS SAMPLING 0 0 0 0 0 T 0 0 1.0
8.0 PERIMETER PROBE MONITORING 0 0.5 0 0 0 3 O 01 3.5
7.0 WELL K40MTOR7NG 0 1 0 0 0 12 O 0 13.0
8.b FLARE TESTING 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0.4
9.0 ASSISTANCE WITH AGENCY NEGOTIATIONS 4 2 0 0 : 4 0 O 0 2.4
t0.4 QUARTERLY REPORTING 0 1 .3 0 6 0 2 0 8.0
SUB-TOTALS 0.0 5.0 3A OA 0,01 0.0 87.0
PRC
1160,1 FLARE SOURCE SUMMA CANISTER GASES ICO2. AMBIENT AIR MONTT
COMPOUNDS TOCINMNC TESTING RENTAL N28 42.N2! OVA ISS SAMPLER SAMPLER MET STATION EOI
214.5 78 8190 50 87.5 85 100 50 150 250 SL
1.0 INSTANTANEOUS SURFACE MONITORING 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
2s ISS,ENTIRE LANDFILL SURFACE 1 t 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0
25 ISS 114 OF GRID AREAS t 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0
2e ISS=8 GRIDS 1 1 01 0 0 1 7 1 1 1 4 0 0 �_
3.0 ISM IN ACTIVE AREA 0 O O 0 of 01 01 0 0 O
CO AMBIENT AIR SAMPLING t 1 0 1 0 O -61- 0.33 0.33
50 LANDFILL GAS SAMPLING 0.33 0.33 O 0.33 0.33 0.33 00 0 0
CO PERIMETER PROBE MONITORING 0.33 0.33 0 0.33 0,331 0.33 O 0 0 0
7.0 WELL MONITORING 0 0 0 0 01 0 01 01 0 0
8.0 FLARE TESTING 0 0 1 01 01 0 01 0 01 0
COST SUMMARY
TOTAL COST FOR EACH TASK W/O ISS MONTHLY YEARLY
INSTANTANEOUS SURFACE MONITORING $300 $3,600
ISM IN ACTIVE AREA $80 $960
11 JAMBIENT AIR SAMPLING NIA NIA
LANDFILL GAS SAMPLING $210 $2,519'
PERIMETER PROBE MONITORING
WELL MONITORING $388 $4,653
FLARE TESTING $639
NA $8,190
ASSISTANCE WITH AGENCY NEGOTIATIONS $178 $3,560
QUARTERLY REPORTING $401 $4,812J
MONTHLY COST $2,196
YEARLY COST $35,962
INTEGRATED SURFACE SAMPLING INC AMBIENT
2A-1 ISS ENTIRE LANDFILL MONTHLY YEARLY AIR SAMPLING
2A-2 ISS ENTIRE LANDFILL QUARTERLY $26,90 $29,162
28-1 ISS 1/4 GRIDS MONTHLY $8,968 $11,226
2B-2 ISS 114 GRIDS QUARTERLY $12,744 $15,002
2C-1 ISS 6 GRIDS MONTHLY $4,248 $6,506
2C-2 ISS 6 GRIDS QUARTERLY $8,904 511,162
$2,968 $5,226
ASSUMPTIONS
1 ISS is not included in the total monthly or yearly cost. Yearly cost for six different ISS
scenarios are shown separately.
2 Cost assumes one perimeter probe and one landfill gas sample per quarter.
3 Cost assumes one ISS lab sample per ISS monitoring event
4 Cost assumes ambient air sampling will be conducted only in the event of ISS,max quarterly,
5 Unit costs are shown for each sample and can be used if addtional samples are required.
6 The proposed method of compensation is on a time and materials basis not to exceed the
total monthly amount.
7 Subcontract consists of lab and source test only and costs will be provided upon request,
8 Yearly agency negotiation task includes 16 hours for compliance plan negotiations
City of Redlands
B,i.Si,q OF CHARGES
Effective January 1., 1996
FEE SCHEDUE
Principal Engineer 89
Senior Prof:ssional 78
Stag Professional 57
Assistant Professional 50
L)esigner 40
Technician 39
Word ProcessinglClerical 37
Engineering Assistant $0.35''mi.
Mileage $0.10 each
Copies $2.50 each
Drawing Copies
1, For hourly worlktrs,time worked in excess of eight hours per day and weekend work will
be charged at 1.5 times the hourly rate.
2. outside services will include a 15% markup unless otherwise noted_
3. All environmental samples may be returned to clients at Gas Control Engineering, Inc.'s
discretion 30 days after submission of final report,unless prior arrangements are made.
4. Proper disposal or handling of soil boring cuttings, well development and purge waters,
decontamination solutions, and other contarninated/potent,ally contaminated materials is
the responsibility of the client. Gas Control Engineering, Inc. can provide containers for
on-site containment and can advise the client regarding proper handling procedures.
YIJL- 8-96 MON 15 :02 GAS CONTROL 7146329968 P. 02
CALSICIENCE STANDARD TELEPHONE QUOTE
QUO LNUMIU 941795
Alan JaneChek ESAq N�'Lrnft Redlands 1150.1 monitoring
�1]II-It N a r n. I Gas Control Engineering, Inc, Expectel Sart Date July, 1906.
714-632.9969 Pygle All Tbrouch project term
714-8329088 fn�ual�-,j C2 Trh gea'.s tv,
Ana I it leal Fees rmatude
Ccirier Services Sample Oisposal
A,n ilytical Consultation Standard Quality Control Measures
UI Qua181 Unit Cost lWotal 1 EVAIMurchome
ir 4"r ag=La 12
, .'AQNIL)25,2 TGNMO SCACMD 1 5 $60.00 $60,00 $0.00 $60,00
ziml CH4 25.1
Non-oond-an
sables
r F'y Irogen Sulfide CARE 15 1 5 $75,00 $75,00 $75,00
r F Ix, Gases by GC/TCD MASA 133 5 W-00 $50,00 MCI() $50,00
r IC-14 SCAOMD Rule EPA TO-14 1 5 sf65.00 $16s'00 $0.00 $165,00
compounds (1150.1
Compounds
15�
NIZ, Source testing will be subcont
tracted to Gas OontrQi Enginsering. Their fee Is$4710. Adding tj?e analytical cost,
;h$Mal sou"testing fee is$6300.
All anal yl cat work conduCted by catscience is subject to Its standard tsrms and conditions, a copy of which is availabis
�JPOn (r q,jest.. Reque"d analySOS which are not covered by this quotation Will be Invoiced at Celz%dence's book price.
The di;�-
xtun(price StfLOV19, I Mly, Contained herein is contingent upon Catsclerica receiving no Hess than 75% of the
numtXff C Sarnplos quoted at the discounted price,
�A3 K n -5*yd4f)6YOV0,CA92641.1432 0 TEL1714181)64434 - FAX:0141884-79m