HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_75-1995_CCv0001.pdf AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into this 18th day of October, 1995 by and between
the City of Redlands hereinafter referred to as "City," and HDR Engineering, Inc. h
referred to as "Consultant." g hereinafter
In consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth,
City and Consultant agree as follows:
Section 1. Envaaement of Consultant Consultant shall perform professional engineering
ee
and consulting services in connection with City's operation of its California Street Landfill rThg
specific services are described in Exhibit "A," attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference. All services to be performed under this Agreement shall be performed in a
professional manner, and Consultant represents that it is skilled and has the professional expertise
necessary to perform the services at the level of competency
mai
practicing engineering and consulting firms performing he same tyently of work.tained by other
Section 2 Responsibilities of Cily, City will provide Consultant access to information
City possesses pertinent to the services. Consultant shall be entitled to rely upon the accuracy
Of City-supplied information. City will further provide access to and make all provisions for
Consultant to enter upon City-owned property as required by Consultant to perform its services
under this Agreement.
Section 3. Period of Service. Consultant shall proceed with the services under this
Agreement promptly and carry out the work diligently, in accordance with the schedule set forth
in Exhibit "A".
Section 4. Payments to Consultant
A. Payment for the services in this Agreement shall be based on a time and materials
basis, in accordance with the Cost Estimate included in Attachment A, at the hourly rates shown
in the Solid Waste fee schedule, included in Attachment A. The total amount of compensation
for this Project shall not exceed the estimate, unless the scope of the Project is materially char ed
and agreed to by the City and Consultant. g
B. Consultant shall bill City within thirty days following the close of each month by
submitting an invoice indicating the work performed, who performed the work, and the detailed
cost of all work including backup material. Payments by City to Consultant shall be made within
thirty (30) days after receipt and approval of Consultant's invoice, by warrant payable to HDR
Engineering, Inc. All notices, bills and payments shall be made in writing and may be given
s personal delivery or by mail. Notices, bills and payments sent by mail should be addressed
as follows:
DJM71 OLE
1
fi
itv
Consultant
City of Redlands HDR Engineering. Inc.
Municipal Utilities Department Attn: Mark Urquhart, P.E.
Attn: Valorie Shatynski 5175 Hillsdale Circle
P. 0. Box ')005 El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Redlands, CA 92373
When so addressed, such notices shall be deemed given upon deposit in the United States
mail; in all other instances, notices, bill and payments shall be deemed given at the time of actual
delivery. Changes may be made in the names and addresses of the person to whom notices, bills,
and payments are to be given by giving notice pursuant to this paragraph.
Section 5. Insurance and Indemnification
A. Consultant shall obtain and maintain during the period of its services policies of
insurance having the following minimum coverage limits:
Comprehensive general public liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2 million in
aggregate
Vehicle liability insurance: $500,000
Worker's compensation insurance: in accordance with State of California statutory limits.
Consultant shall provide City with Certificates of Insurance evidencing such insurance for services
under this Agreement, with the exception of workers' compensation. City shall be named as an
additional insured in all insurance policies and such insurance shall be primary with respect to
City and non-contributing to any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City.
B. Consultant shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend City and its elected officials,
officers, agents and employees from and against all claims, loss, damage, charge or expense, to
which they or any of them may be put or subjected to arising out of or resulting from any willful
or negligent act or actions, omission or failure to act on the part of the Consultant. its
employees, agents and suppliers for whose acts or omissions any of them may be liable in the
performance of the services described in this Agreement.
Section 6. Attorney's Fees. In the event any legal action is commenced to enforce
or interpret any of the terms or provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall, in
addition to any costs or other relief, be entitled to the recovery of its reasonable attorneys' fees.
Section 7. Assignment. Consultant shall not sublet or assign any of the services
covered by this Agreement, except with the prior written approval of City and in strict
compliance with the terms, provisions and conditions of the Agreement.
DJM-1 1 01-E
2
Section 8. Kev Personnel. The Consultant's key personnel for the performance of the
services are as follows:
Mark Urguhart, P.E. and Clay Rwnbaoa, E.I.T.
Consultant agrees that these key persons shall not be replaced without concurrence from the City.
Section 9. Drawings and Records. It is understood and agreed by and between the
parties that all document, records, drawings, and other documents developed by Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement shall become the property of City and shall be delivered to City if
and when requested. Any reuse of such documents for other projects and any use of incomplete
documents will be at City's sole risk, and City agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless
Consultant for same.
Section 10. Independent Contractor. Consultant is for all purposes under this
Agreement an independent contractor. All personnel provided by Consultant pursuant to the
provisions of this Agreement shall be employed by Consultant for its account only, and in no
event shall Consultant or any personnel retained by it be deemed to have been employed by City
or engaged by City for the account of or on behalf of City.
Section 11. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by City, without cause,
upon seven (7) days written notice to Consultant. Upon receipt of a termination notice,
Consultant shall promptly discontinue all services affected and deliver to City copies of any data,
design calculations, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and such other
information and materials as may have been accumulated by Consultant in performing services
under this Agreement. If this Agreement is terminated by City, an adjustment to Consultant's
compensation shall be made, but no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit or
unperformed services.
Section 12. Books and Accounts. Consultant shall maintain books and accounts of all
project related payroll costs and expenses and incidental expense. Books shall be available at all
reasonable times for examination by City at the office of Consultant.
Section 13. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between
the parties hereto as to the matters contained and any negotiations, proposals or oral agreements
integrated herein and superseded by this Agreement. This Agreement may be amended only by
written agreement signed by the parties hereto.
Section 14. Governing Law. This Agreement is to be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California.
DA 47 1 OLE 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of City and Consultant have
signed in confirmation of this Agreement.
CITY OF REDLANDS HDR ENGINEERING, INC.
Mayor prP ,dri+
x
41
Attest: L
Cit�erk {�
DJM71 I Oz.s 4
PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN AND OPERATIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES
CALIFORNIA STREET LANDFILL, CITY OF REDLANDS
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The City of Redlands owns and operates the Califo imia Street Sanitary Landfill. The
Landfill is currently approaching the final design grades as prepared by Kleinfelder.
The City realizes that increasing the efficiency in operating the landfill will lead to
increased waste capacity and will result in additional life for the landfill,
On August 7, 1995, HDR met with Ms. valorie Shatynski, City Solid Waste
Manager, to discuss the City's need for services in operations and design to
optimize the landfill operations, efficiency, and capacity. The City requested a
proposal from HDR to provide design grading information and operations
procedures. The objectives are to (1) provide information and guidance to site
operators to facilitate continued operations within the final design Parameters, (2)
reduce site inefficiencies, including fill cell construction and soil cover operations,
and (3) provide a design grading plan to maximize the existing landfill space.
Because the City is approaching the limits of currently permitted capacity at the
landfill, guidance to the site operators is necessary. This guidance will allow the
City to maintain fi II plans, slopes, and grades in accordance with the final design
criteria. Additionally, this guidance will allow the City to plan and extend fill space
beyond the current final plans on the existing fill area. This will result in extension
of waste capacity at the landfill, which will give the City the additional time
required to either permit a lateral expansion, or to arrange for other solid waste
disposal options.
SCOPE OF WORK
Following is a proposed scope of services to achieve the project objectives. They
are divided into two tasks for design and operation, respectively. Each task contains
an understanding and description of services.
Task I - Design Plan
Understanding and Assumptions. The current design plan (Kleinfelder Drawings C-
11) shows a maximum elevation of 1218 feet. Side slopes are a maximum of 1.7:1
(H:V) on the lower slope and 3:1 (H:V) on the upper slope. Kleinfelder performed a
slope stability for the maximum fill configuration, which yielded acceptable factors
of safety per CCR, Title 23, Chapter 15. Due to the City's desire to extend the height
of the existing landfill, as feasible, to increase the capacity, a new approach is
proposed by HDR.
HDR's approach will be to hold the new side slopes to a 31 inclination for
constructibility and extend the proposed final grading plan, as practical, with the
required benches. The main constraints in increasing the fill height will be the
minimum width of the landfill required to effectively operate (the unit is long and
narrow).
9597(J 015195) ---------------
-hal
PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN AND OPERATIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES` ,
CALIFORNIA STREET LANDFILL, CITY OF REDLANDS
We propose to reanalyze the slope stability, as needed, to support the vertical
expansion design using site specific geotechnical information from the Kleinfelder
input data. We propose a computer analysis using PC-Stable and a deformation
analysis, similar to the Kleinfelder addendum to the Slope/Stability Report.
Based on our discussions with the City concerning site condition and configuration;
HDR has assumed that the existing drainage system is adequate and that a drainage
analysis, other than the conceptual layout on the vertical expansion, will not be
revisited until the Final Closure Plan, or a horizontal expansion is considered.
Subtask la-Draft Grading Plan--
HDR will compile a draft plan and three cross-sections for City approval. The
increased waste volume will be calculated.
Subtask lb-Draft Slope Stability Analysis--
HDR will perform a slope stability analysis to accompany the draft grading plan. It
will include computer calculations using PC-Stable and a deformation analysis using
data from the existing Kleinfelder addendum, as needed. The analysis will evaluate
slope stability of the existing unlined landfill including the proposed grades from
the design plan in Task 1.
Subtask T c-Meeting and Concurrence by City--
HDR will attend a meeting with the City to:
➢ Explain results of Subtasks 1 a and 1 b.
➢ Obtain approval of the results.
➢ Obtain approval to proceed with developing grading sheets for Task 2.
To minimize costs, we have assumed that HDR will be provided a computer disk
with the most recent topographic map and Kleinfelder's final grading plan. We
prefer the files in Micro Station, but can convert other formats.
Task 2 - Operations Control
Understanding and Assumptions. The City desires to reduce cover soil usage and
implement a grade control program at the site. HDR staff will meet with appropriate
City operations and management staff to provide and describe an operations
methodology.
Current daily cover usage is high because of the sandy soils available from the
borrow site. We will review the City's information on imported soil alternatives for
daily cover, and maintenance, in compliment with the tarping program.
Recommendations will be made for suitability. HDR will also recommend specific
9597(10/5195) 2 h
PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN AND OPERATIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES
CALIFORNIA STREET LANDFILL, CITY OF REDLANDS
operations techniques to limit the amount of soil that is placed and cell construction
to maximize efficiency of the tarping program.
HDR will develop grading sheets for field staking. We would require that a land
survey firm is used to initially survey the site (coordinated with the topographic
survey in October 1995), provide additional benchmarks, and control fence
Post/stakes on key grid points and the initial round of grade stakes. After this is
accomplished, HDR will meet with the City engineer and site operator to instruct
them on reading grade stakes, setting new grade stakes, surveying grades stakes,
and calculating fill elevation from operations and design plans to be provided by
HDR. The goal will be for HDR to train the operators to ultimately perform survey
grade staking independently. Data would then be sent to HDR for review and site
utilization calculations to tie with design planning.
We have assumed that the City could contract directly with the survey firm. This
will save some costs in HDR subcontracting. HDR's proposal includes developing
specifications for the City's surveyor to perform Subtask S2. We have assumed that
the City will use a local firm, familiar with the site, who could provide the data in
electronic format. This could be coordinated with the aerial survey for this year.
It will be important that the key original stakes set by the surveyor are not disturbed
and that the operators carry on a system of regularly setting new stakes for
upcoming operation before all the old ones are destroyed. To this end, we
recommend that the solid waste operators obtain survey equipment (level, rod,
tape, and rod and survey book) to be used by HDR with the operations personnel.
The subtasks below outline the proposed program.
Subtask S2-Field Surveyor Services--
The City's surveyor or contracted surveyor (Hereafter, "surveyor") will field stake
the site and provide:
Benchmarks. We recommend that three permanent benchmarks (one at each end of
the site at a minimum) are installed or verified by the surveyor in conformance with
requirements of Title 23, CCR will be included. This may include re-establishment
of the existing benchmark used for previous aerials. Permanent benchmarks for
closure must be certified by a registered surveyor and be out of traffic and protected
by site operators.
Slope Stakes. Based on coordinates provided by HDR from the HDR design plan,
(Task 1) the surveyor will stake fiI I grades, at 100 foot intervals along the grid at a
finished point near the toe, top of the existing slope; and at the point of the
proposed design side slope. Grid coordinates and fill heights (calculated by the
surveyor in the field based on HDR design grade elevation provided) will be
marked by the surveyor on the stakes.
9597(1015195) 3
PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN AND OPERATIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES
CALIFORNIA STREET LANDFILL, CITY OF REDLANDS
Grid Stakes. To aid in routine grade surveys and construction staking, the surveyor
will provide (as directed by HDR) selected fence post stakes (a 100 X 100 square at
three intervals along the landfill). These will provide a more durable set that can be
used to set stakes as the active lift approaches this area. (Landfill operators can
visually pull a tape along grid the line of two consecutive accurate stakes). One set
of these should also be marked for the aerial survey in addition to targets.
The surveyor will also provide grade stakes for roughly 800 feet of length of the fill
in 100 foot intervals with coordinates, elevation, and fill height. (This will help the
operators become familiar with filling to the stakes prior to performing surveys.)
HDR will provide the proposed fill elevation. During event 1, HDR will monitor the
surveyor and instruct a designated landfill operator in the survey methods, grade
stake information, and filling procedures per the stakes.
Subtask 2a-operations Plan instruction--
HDR staff will develop an operations plan drawing for site operators. The plan will
incorporate information on the following:
➢ Traffic and progression of fill.
➢ Orientation of working face.
> Size of daily cell.
➢ Wet weather operations.
HDR will meet with site operators to explain the plan. We assume that two plan
sheets would be provided. This will be coordinated concurrently with HDR's
monitoring of the surveyor in Subtask S2 above.
Subtask 2b- Grading Plan Survey Sheets, Staking, and Calculations--
The goal of the Subtask S2, initial field surveyor staking, includes providing precise
stakes on the grid so that HDR can train the site operators to perform their own field
staking. The key stakes originally set by the surveyor will be maintained to the
extent possible until the operators can be trained to reset stakes (using tape
measurement) as the fill progresses.
We assume that HDR would provide two personnel for the first staking event with
the City personnel (Event 2) and train a landfill operator(s) hands-on during this
event. We assume that the second survey (Event 3) would be performed by one
HDR staff using the designated trained landfill operator as a helper. This event
would be similar, except that the landfill operator would be expected to perform all
facets of the survey proficiently. As proficiency is reached, HDR could evaluate the
potential for operators to perform surveys independently.
HDR will provide the fill grades for tops of lifts, grade breaks, or final waste grades
so that grades stakes can be set. These will be provided on grading plan sheets. The
9597 (10/5/95) 4
PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN AND OPERATIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES
CALIFORNIA STREET LANDFILL, CITY OF REDLANDS
grading plan sheets would be used for surveys by HDR and operators after the
original surveyor survey (Subtask S2, above) and all subsequent surveys. Plan sheet
provided will include the following:
> Existing or final contours in faded format.
> Grid points to be surveyed.
> A space by each grid point for data entry.
> A blank to enter the elevation of survey grade.
➢ Design grade (approximate for lift or precise final grade).
> A blank to enter a fill (to tenth of foot) to the design grade.
The existing grade is viewed through the level and entered. The design grade on the
plan (D) is given on the grade sheet (by HDR). The level operator will calculate the
fill and enter it on the grade sheet. The information is orally given to the rod person
to enter on the stake (walkie-talkies are advantageous for this).
The duration and number of grading survey sheets would depend upon fill
progression and 'protection of stakes. A six week period may be appropriate for re-
staking.
The grades from surveys by landfill operators would be copied for HDR's office.
Calculations would be performed in CADD by HDR to determine the landfill
volume used. These volumes would then be used to estimate soil usage and site life
remaining.
Task 3 - Daily Cover Evaluations
HDR will provide input regarding operations for placement of the City's alternate
daily cover system and weekly soil cover methods. This will be done through
conferring with City staff and assisting site operators regarding cover operations.
BUDGET
Attachment I is the estimated budget for the proposed scope of work. It is based on
billing rates for the specific senior engineer and project manager proposed under
this proposal and average rates for other support staff shown. All actual billing rates
charged will be based on a fixed multiplier of 3.1 times individual staff salaries to
include overhead and profit. The rates for all labor will be within the ranges shown
on Attachment 3.
The estimated budget is $26,444. The breakdown by subtasks and work elements is
shown on Attachment 1. We have assumed:
1 One meeting for Task 1 by two HDR staff.
9597 (t 015195) 5 HR
PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN AND OPERATIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES
CALIFORNIA STREET LANDFILL, CITY OF REDLANDS
2. Four hours to coordinate specifications with the City's surveyor (Subtask S2).
3. One meeting by the project manager to discuss the operations plan at the
same point as surveyor Event 1.
4. The second field event would be attended by two HDR staff members (Mark
Urquhart and Clay Rumbaoa).
5. The third field event wi II be attended by with one HDR staff member (Clay
Rumbaoa).
6. The City would provide the land survey under Subtask S2, according to
specification fumished by HDR. Our budget for grade plans assumed that
staking information from the surveyor survey would be available in
electronic format.
7. That the City would provide all materials for field surveys, including level,
tripod, direct elevation rod, grade stakes, hubs, two tape measures (one 100
ft min. and one 200 ft), recommended walkie talkies, if possible, and other
materials.
8. To save costs, the latest aerial topographic map and the current final grading
plans for the site would be available on disk in a format usable by HDR for
Task 1. We assume that the topographic map would be according to the
coordinate system to be used for closure. If the existing final grading plan by
Kleinfelder is not available on disk, this would only be a minor (a few hours)
budget impact to the proposed work.
9. The parameters in the Kleinfelder analysis will be usable in stability and
deformation analysis for revised final grades, by a subconsultant to HDR.
Based on review of the Kleinfelder study, we have assumed that
approximately $2,500 will be required, provided that the existing
information is usable for a majority of the new slope stability analysis. The
slope stability analysis will include analysis of the increased grades for the
existing site but does not include slope stability for a horizontal expansion.
10. Additional work to that covered in this proposal will be performed on a time
and materials basis according to agreement between the City and HDR.
SCHEDULE
HDR is available to begin work immediately. One week advance notice is preferred
for project kick-off and key events. Attachment 2 contains a list of proposed task
schedule durations and assumptions followed by a bar chart schedule (Figure 1).
The detailed schedule is for planning only. The actual dates will be coordinated
with the City.
9597(10/5/95) 6
PROPOSAL FOR DESIGN AND OPERATIONS ENGINEERING SERVICES
C-ALIFORNIA STREET LANDFILL, CITY OF REDLANDS
PROJECT TEAM
We are proposing a tight team to closely coordinate the design plans with the field
operations. Mark Urquhart, P.E., will serve as project manager and direct all
technical work. He will perform review of grading plans, attend meetings to discuss
the project with the City staff assigned to the work, perform the first field staking
event, and provide training of City field staff. Clay Rumbaoa will serve as senior
engineer and assist mark closely. He will Perform design of the grading plans,
oversee slope stability analyses, perform all three proposed field staking events by
HDR, and develop grade staking plans and calculations. HDR will subcontract with
Carlton Engineering, a geotechnical firm, to perform a slope stability analysis to
support the design. Dave Jermstad is of Carlton Engineering and is a registered
geologist with over 15 years experience. He has performed numerous slope stability
analysis including analysis of landfill stability under Title 14 CCR. We have
included resumes for key HDR project staff assigned to the City's project.
9597(l Q15/95) 7
n pq r_ o 46
�' •'�" M rs M M M r �► N M M
c
9
~so 40
C
w
h M
a �
N M M t
Qok
so
p N H 0 p f N m a • 4-
+ p - C-1
�y P.
H
Cl I
QR
F- W �o
N a ,r er
W O M7 q M
Z
F N
W p
N p
Q Z N M N
Q W 40
0
r
yM r
r �
M
m �
C C
N
Y U. H f*V W Y1 n Of
Y J
■ n w o N N + + w
ATTACHMENT 2 - SCHEDULE
CITY OF REDLANDS
DESIGN AND OPERATIONS FOR CALIFORNIA STREET LANDFILL
E
surve b H&H for Aenel
1011195 10/12/95 11 Ground surve edes&anal.
o Proceed to HDR 10/18/55 10/23/95 5
AerW ro a hrc Ma from C$ vat b Councat on 1&17195.
10/13/95 10/31195 18 2-112 weeks 10 obtain and CAPD So.
I.Deal n Plan
10/18/11 1214195 47 Overall duration for Task 1; see subtasks.
ta" Draft Gradin Plan
1b. Draft Slope Stability
10/31/95 11/14/95 14 Kleinfelder and aerial CADD 8103 available.
11/12/95 11/26/95 14 For vortical ansian ma need more for harizprrtal .
Review rrme 11/26/95 1?l..iV95 7
1 c, Meetin with the Ci Ma v de &? u
1Z13�5 1214195 1 Results in a roval tv roceed
Z.O rattan Contra! with stakln er Ian.
1214195 3/211196 112 Overall duration for Task 2; see subtasks.
S2. Aerfd Su►v0 b Othsra
1214195 12!12195 $ Coordinated offer Subtask 1c.
HDR Gradin Sheet to Others and Trainin Even; 1
1214195 12/12/55 8 One da HDR me0tin at site dura surve g2.
Za•
O111watfon Plan Instructions
1214195 17113/85 9 Meeting would be at same oint as HDR gradin sheet.
2b" GradingPlan surve 1Stakin Calcs
Gradino Sheet#21/23196 3R5i'9B 62 Overall durse ation for Task 2b- asubtasks Phasina.
1123198 71261953 Event 2 Assumed six weeks from event 1 stakin b sury or.
Calculations Mame 1125198 1130185 1 One field day by HDR-date shown onl a raximate.
7131196 215/88 5 Follows field event data atherin .
GradingSheet 4,3
3112196 3115/98 3 Assumed six weeks from event 2 stakin .
Event 3
3118196 311 9196 --------1 Ona field da b HDR-date shown onlya rommate,
Calculations Memo
3120198 3125196 5 Follows field avant data atherin .
3, Dalt Cover Evaluations
1214195 1211:19!: 13 overall duration for Task 3.
TOTAL PROJECT
10/18/95 31$5198 109 Overall projed-includin
Periodic grade control.
9563
HDR Engineering, Inc.
96 ldy
'a
4)
96 AM
I i
• ! I
I
� I [
Im
96 CIQ�
LLf
■
j
i
96 uer
I I
i
96 Q
I �I
i
i
I I
I j
I �
S6 AON
I I
I
N Pa C O r M N C R {U?y
W
O N IL
c A
� � O
a
M N
U �
v
w
y
ATTACHMENT
HDR ENGINEERING,INC.
CHARGES FOR SOLID WASTE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,1995
LABOR
Title Hourly
Company Officer/Principal in Charge G`mfe Rate
Senior Consultant QA/QC E-10 $145.00 -160.00
Principal Engineer E-9 125.00 - 145.00
Project Manager E-8 125.00 - 145.00
Senior Engineer E-6 110.00 -125.00
Associate Engineer E-5 100.00 - 115.00
Assistant Engineer E-4 90.00 -105.00
Staff Engineer E-3 80.00 - 95.00
Junior Engineer E 2 70.00 -85.00
Technician Manager E-1 65.00 -75.0o 5
Senior Technician 65.00 -75.00
Technician T-4 50.00 -65.00
Assistant Technician T-3 45.00 -60.00
Administrative Manager T-2 40.00 -55.00
Senior Administrator M-5 55.00 -70.00
Administrator M-4 55.00 -65.00
Assistant Administrator M-3 45.00 -55.00
Administrative Assistant M-2 35.00 -45.00
Word Processor C-5 40.00 -50.00
Secretary C-4 30.00 -45.00
Clerk C-3 28.00 -40.00
Construction Manager C-2 25.00 -38.00
Resident Engineer 100.00 -115.00
Senior Inspector 90.00 -110.00
Inspector 60.00 -70.00
45.00 -60.00
EXPENSES
In-House Expenses
HDR Computer for CAD Applications(Hourly)
HDR Computer for Engineering/ $15.00
Spread Sheets/Word Processing(Hourly)
Vehicle Mi (Per $10.00
$ .30
Outside Ex Os-At Cost Plus 10%
Hired Services-Subconsullants,typing services, etc.
Miscellaneous Supplies -Publications,printing,equipment rental,etc.
M A R K J U R- 0 U H A R T P E
EDUCATION
B.S.,Civil Engineering,California State University,Sacramento, 198-3)
REGISTRATION
Civil Engineering,California License#41199, 1986
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Urquhart's professional experience has been focused on solid waste management in
California, including permitting,design,construction, land use,and closure planning for landfills,
transfer stations.or Materials Recovery Facilities(MRFs)-Significant prcjects,have included site
development design and pen-nitting for a Class 11 ash disposal facility and a Class III Landfill-,
pen-nit reports for numerous solid waste facilities- and design,permitting,and construction
monitoring for a transfer station/materials recovery facility expansion. While employed with the
San Joaquin County Solid Waste Division,he managed engineering for all county solid waste
engineering projects including,design,operations and regulatory compliance work for three
municipal solid waste landfills.a municipal solid waste transfer station,and site development of a
new Class III landfill.Selected projects include:
Landfill Design , Operations and Regulatory ( omplionce
Performed closure planning and regulatory compliance for the 28th Street Landfill for the City of
Sacramento,California.Work included development of a final grading plan,periodic calculation
grading
of site volumes and utilization,drainage calculations,field engineering and phasing,of operations
for the remaining landfill unit.Provided technical guidance to the landfill equipment operators
construct final fill grades. Attended regulatory agency monitoring programs for correct re
meetings and wrote a port -
recommending corrective action and activities needed for regulatory
—
compliance.
Directed field operations and perfon-ned field engineering required for the Harney lane Sanitary
Landfill in Lodi.California.This involved training of operators in performing
surveys for
construction according to operations and grading plans. Developed calculation program to guide
fill staking,and to track remaining site life and cover soil utilization. Equipment operators were
instructed on cell size.compaction methods and cover procedures in order to save cover soil and
meet the closure schedule. Winter operations plans were prepared for the LEA to include
provisions for cover soil,drainage and operations phasing. Performed field engineerinl'-,for
construction of drainage ditches and final site face overside drains by county forces.
Directed and prepared preliminary feasibility study,preliminary design report, land use permit
application. leachate management plan,and AB 2296 site identification and description element
for the development of a proposed Jaeger Ash Landfill for Sutter County.Califomia.
Prepared a preliminary design report involving development of the existing 77 acre Foothill
Sanitary Landfill to ultimately include 17 lined units comprising 550 acres in Linden.California.
This included a geotechnical investigation and liner design report.Authored an operations plan
for the county's use in entering a long-term operations agreement with a private operator.
Prepared the Report of Disposal Site Information(RDSI),Periodic Site Review(PSR).and
Report of Waste Discharge(RWD).
MAR !( J . U R 0 U H A R I P. E .
PAGE 2
Prepared groundwater SWAT proposal and report,construction bid plans and specifications for
computerized scale system,and a Hazardous Waste Exclusion Program. Co-authored the final
cover CQA plan and slope stability report.
Prepared the RDSI,RWD,PSR.and a hazardous waste exclusion program for Corral Hollow
Sanitary Landfill in Tracy.California. Directed implementation ofair and water Solid Waste
Assessment Tests(S WATs)and Subchapter 15 water monitoring plan.
Wrote the Construction Quality Assurance(CQA)plan for installation of Phase 11 final cover for
the Kiefer Sanitary Landfill for Sacramento County. California. Reviewed County design plans.
The project was put on hold due to other operational issues.
Oversaw development of preliminary engineering plans, Subchapter 15 groundwater monitoring
plans,draft Environmental Impacts Report,and draft permit documents for North Count
Sanitary Landfill and Recycling Center in Lodi.California. r
Prepared RWD.RDSI,and PSR Report for the Cove Contractor's Landfill in Stockton.
California. The reports included conceptual closure plans,groundwater,and vadose zone
modeling of contaminant transport„and a remediation feasibility study.
Assisted in compilation of phasing plans for the development and expansion of the Savage
Canyon Landfill for the City of Whittier,California.
Directed site assessment and closure for the inactive asbestos landfill and surface impoundments
for J-M Manufacturing in Stockton,California.This included investigation of site surface soil,
surface water,surface impoundments and landfills,and regulatory compliance.
Solid Waste Management Planning
Assisted with a system-wide planning study for the Sacramento County Solid Waste Authority,
California,to select potential sites for waste management facilities. Evaluation included potential
transfer stations.. MRFs,household hazardous waste collection facilities,and composting
facilities.
Assisted the City of Whittier.California, in developing short-and long-term capital improvement
plans for the Savage Canyon Sanitary Landfill. This included an evaluation of site lives for
development alternatives and projecting required short-terra tipping fee adjustments.
Assisted in development of AB 939 planning document development for EI Dorado County,
California. Included source reduction and recycling.non-disposal facility.and sitin g elements.
Authored a concept paper on yard waste collection and composting options for the El Dorado
Hills Community Services District,California.
Transfer Station and Materials Recovery / Processing ,
Planning , Design , and Permitting
Project manager for a 500-tpd solid waste material recovery facility expansi
Sutter Disposal, Inc.,California. on study for Yuba-
MARK a . URQUHART , P . E .
PAGE 3
Served as project manager and civil engineer for design,permitting,and construction inspection
design,
for the new expanded Lovelace Road Transfer Station for San Joaquin County,California.Work-
included development of final construction bid specifications and the Report of Station
plans included a new transfer building,recycling areas,a retention pond,
and an office and maintenance building.The plans called for demolition
demolition of the existing transfer
station under a schedule allowing continuous operation of the facility during construction.
Assisted in preparing a feasibility study for the development of a transfer station/MRF in El
Dorado County,California.This included a cost analysis for landfill operations and primary
collection using balefill versus open to i p transfer systems. 0 facility on a closed landfill
Performed analysis of pen-nitting requirements for siting a compostin f
tl Z� -
esign requirements for Integrating the facility with closure
in Contra Costa County,California.D
construction activities were outlined.
Prepared a siting study for three small volume transfer stations for El Dorado County.California.
Included development and utilization of a site rankinc-1,criteria system,search for and study of
potential sites,evaluation of collection haul routes and waste generation patterns,development of
a conceptual station layout,and preparation of a report which estimated costs and recommended
sites for development.
Site Remediation and Closure
Served as project manager for site assessment for closure two inactive asbestos disposal facilities.
Served as project manager and engineer for site assessment,removal,and disposal of metals
affected soil.
PROFESSIONAL ENDEAVORS
HDR Engineering.Inc., 1992-Present
Z:"
Kleinfelder,Inc.. 1989-1992
San Joaquin County Department of Public Works,Solid Waste Division, 1984-1989
R.B.Welty&Associates, 1984
Sharpe Army Depot,Facilities Engineering Division, 1983-1984
PROFESSIONAL AFFI LI AT IONS
SWANA-Member and Secretary of California Chapters Legislative Task Force
Member of the American Public Works Association
AWARD
SWANA.Gold Rush Chapter,Outstanding Sustaining Member of the Year. 1993- 1994
E
EDUCATION
B.S.,Civil Engineering,Bradley University,Peoria, IL, 1983
REGISTRATION
Engineer-in-Training
EXPERIENCE
Mr.Rumbaoa has over 1 1 years experience in civil engineering,specializing in environmental
and landfill engineering. Some of his projects include the following:
Performed a review of the five-year capital improvement plan budget for the County
Diego,California. Recommended revised budgets for expenditures at their active and ofinactivelandfills,and prioritized projects on compliance requirements.
Prepared facility and engineering plans(drawings and report)for the Subtitle D horizontal
expansion of the Hanes Mill Road Landfill in Winston-Salem,North Carolina.This involved
Preparing base and final grading plans,erosion and sediment calculations,leachate generation
estimates,slope stability analysis,and construction and development plans.
Prepared a five-year engineering review for the Savage Canyon Landfill in the City of Whittier,
California(I 32-acre facility). Completed a five-year capital budget improvement for the site.
Prepared landfill improvements for the Santiago Canyon Landfill in Orange County,California.
The improvements included realignment of a perimenter road,drainage and slope modification.
Provided technical assistance and construction management for the implementation of Phase I&
II of the design for San Marcos Landfill in San Marcos,California.This involves responding to
questions concerning the design,coordinating survey stakeout data,and managing required tests
and the installation of the liner.Assisted previously in the completion of the vertical expansion
design for the 210-acre San Marcos Landfill in northern San Diega County.Tasks performed
included leachate production analyses,resulting in the implementation of leachate collection
and removal system;grading design including base,phasing and final
grades;provision of
drainage network that best routes run-off and run-on to surface impoundments;and preparation
of construction plans,specifications and cost estimates for the bid package.Also prepared a
Preliminary and Final Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plan,RDSI and five-year
engineering review.
Responsible for management and preliminary landfill expansion design, including the base and
final grades, liner system,water balance, leachate collection system,fill sequencing,hydrology of
the site,desilting basin and soil stockpile for Antelope Valley Landfill in Antelope Valley,
California.Assisted in the permitting process of the site through the Local Enforcement Agency,
California Integrated Waste Management Board and Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Prepared a Report of Disposal Site Information,Report of Waste Discharge,and a Preliminary
and Final Closure and Postclosure Maintenance Plan.
Assisted in the completion of the Phase 11 design of the 400-acre Frank R Bowerman Landfill in
Orange County,California.This included the design of the base grades,leachate collection and
removal system using the HELP Model and water balance methods,drainage design to
accommodate 100-year,24-hour storm sub and toe drains,and preparing soil balance analyses to
Jul
CLAY R . Ru.mBAOA , E . I T .
PAGE 2
manage the ongoing operation and construction of the phase.He also performed construction cost
estimates for the completed design and provided technical support.during construction.
Provided engineering services to company owned landfills,hauling divisions,and transfer
stations while working for Waste Management of North America.Major personal
accomplishments and responsibilities include design,management,plans and specifications,
contractor and consultant procurement for removal and installation of underground petroleum
and waste oil tanks as well as all above ground facilities at all,California divisions;lead engineer
in the development and design of expansion to-existing northern Califomia landfills from 108
acres to 225 acres involving preparation of conceptual,permit and construction design for
expansion as well as developmental cost;and composed reports for tank-management plan,
closure plan for landfills and a gas monitoring plan.
Designed and prepared specifications and cost estimates for site improvement projects;
coordinated and supervised contractor performance;provided weekly reports to management
resulting in a significantly more efficient operation;prepared a work plan to implement soil and
groundwater interim remedial action;and became proficient in CADAM(computer aided design
and manufacturing)for Lockhead Missile and Space Company.
Contributed to the retrofit design of a landfill in accordance to RCRA standards, provided
quality assurance and quality control in the installation of a bentonite slurry wall; installed
monitoring and extraction wells; researched site history, as required by state regulatory
agency, utilizing field surveys, aerial photography, regulatory agency files, library
materials, resulting in completion of a report to the Regional Water Quality Control
Board; performed pump tests to determine aquifer properties; and successfully trained new
technicians in field work techniques.
PROFESSIONAL ENDEAVORS
HDR Engineering,Inc., 1990-Pi-esent
Waste Management of North America, 1989-1990
Lockheed Missile and Space Compan.v, 1987-1989
Canonie Environmental Services Corporation, 1984-1987
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
Member,American Society of Civil Engineers
Member,Southern California Waste Management Forum
Member,Solid Waste Management Association in North America