Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_50-2001_CCv0001.pdf AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF PROFESSIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES This agreement for the provision of environmental consulting services (this "Agreement") is made and entered into this 3rdday of April , 2001, by and between the City of Redlands,a municipal corporation(hereafter"City")and Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. (hereafter"Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the City of Redlands and Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE 1-ENGAGEMENT OF CONSULTANT 1.1. Engagement of Consultant. City hereby retains Consultant to perform professional environmental consulting services (the "Services") associated with City's preparation of an environmental impact report for its proposed sports park project (the "Project"), as described in the Project Understanding which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, upon the terms and conditions described herein. Consultant's Services shall include, but not be limited to, preparation of an environmental impact report and staff coordination of the proposed sports park located on the north side of San Bernardino Avenue between Dearborn Street and Wabash Avenue. This work shall be in accordance with the Scope of Services for the Project as shown in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Consultant shall HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING, INC CONTRACT FOR SERVICES MARCH 5, 2001 PAGE 2 determine the method,details and means of performing the Services,and Consultant shall perform the Services to the best of its ability and with the skill, expertise and level of competency presently maintained by other practicing professionals providing similar service in the industry. ARTICLE 2-PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1. Project Description. The proposed sports park will consist of a 115 acre site and will include fourteen soccer fields of varying size, two basketball courts, a picnic and lawn area, a six thousand seat soccer/football stadium, four arena style soccer areas, and eight softball fields with batting cages. The softball fields will include a food service/restaurant facility. The park will also have concession stands in two locations. ARTICLE 3-ADDITIONAL SERVICES 3.1. Subcontractors. Consultant may retain subconsultants and subcontractors in connection with its performance of the Services subject to the prior consent by City. The Consultant's key personnel for performance of the Services are as follows: Randy A. Nichols, AICP, Project Manager U, c G h;F9 HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING, INC CONTRACT FOR SERVICES MARCH 0, 2001 PAGE 3 y Mr. Nichols will be supported by the following subconsuttants; Civic Solutions, Inc., Matthew Bassi Giroux & Associates, Hans Giroux McKenna, Et Al,, Jeanette McKenna Consultant agrees that these key personnel, as described more fully in Exhibit"C' attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, shall be principally responsible for the performance of the Services, and that such personnel shall not be replaced without prior consent of City. Consultant further represents that these key personnel shall each expend their time performing the Services for City during the term of this Agreement as stated in Exhibit"B" 3.2. Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense during the entire term of this Agreement including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance: (a) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance. A policy of comprehensive general liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis in an amount not less than either (i) a combined single limit of $1,000,000 or (ii) bodily injury limits of i �t HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING, INC CONTRACT FOR SERVICES MARCH 6, 2001 PAGE 4 $1,000,000 per person, $500,000.00 per occurrence and property damage limits of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $2,000,000.00 in aggregate. i 4 (b) Worker's Compensation Insurance A policy of worker's compensation insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00 or as will fully comply with the statutory requirements of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for Consultant against any loss, claim or damage arising form any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained as an employee by Consultant in the course of carrying out the work or services contemplated in this Agreement. (c) Automotive Insurance. A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis in an amount not less than either (i) bodily injury liability limits of$500,000 per person and $1,000,000 per occurrence and property damage liability limits of $500,000.00 per occurrence and $500,000.00 in the aggregate or(ii) combined single limit liability of$500,000.00. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non-owned, leased and hired cars. (d) Professional Liability Insurance. A policy of Professional Liability Insurance that will provide coverage in the amount not less than $500,000.00 per occurrence and $1,000,000.00 in the aggregate. i wN .. a HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING, INC CONTRACT FOR SERVICES MARCH f, 2001 PAGE 5 ARTICLE 4- SCHEDULE TERMINATION AND MISCELLANEOUS i PROVISIONS 4.1.Schedule for Completion. Time is of the essence and the work described in Exhibit "B" shall be completed consistent with the schedule included as Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. City and Consultant recognize that delays could occur for reasons outside the control of consultant. If this situation occurs, an extension of due date may be permitted by City. 4.2. Fee. In consideration for its performance of the Services, City shall pay to Consultant an amount not to exceed $85,710 in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit "E", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Payment to Consultant shall be made upon receipt of an itemized invoice describing and outlining the items for which payment is requested. Invoices shall document the status of the Services associated with the fees billed. All billings are due and payable within 30 days of the date they are mailed. 4.1 Termination. City may terminate this Agreement at any time,without cause, by prior written notice to Consultant. Upon such termination, Consultant shall deliver to City all documents, reports, materials and work of any nature pertaining to this Agreement and in the possession or under its control. In such an event, Consultant shall be paid for HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING, INC CONTRACT FOR SERVICES MARCH 6, 2001 PAGE 6 the work performed under this Agreement to the date of termination costs which would be strictly time and reimbursable expenses. Payment of work completed under contract to date of termination shall be made based on time and reimbursable billings as of the project termination. The total amount of this Agreement is as set forth in Paragraph 4.2. 4.4. Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its elected officials, officers and employees from and against any and all liability arising out of or resulting from the performance of this Agreement by Consultant, and its employees and its agents. 4.5. Independent Contractor. This Agreement is for professional services and does not make the employees of Consultant employees of City for the purpose of payroll deductions, unemployment insurance, or any other benefits. Consultant shall at all times retain the status of an independent contractor. 4.6. Nondiscrimination. During the performance of this Agreement, Consultant agrees that Consultant shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation or disability, including the medical condition of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome(AIDS)or any condition related thereto in the selection and retention of employees and sub-consultant and the procurement of materials and equipment. HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING, INC CONTRACT FOR SERVICES MARCH 6, 2001 PAGE 7 4.7. Ownershir) of Documents. The reports, drawings, maps and other contract documents prepared under this agreement by the Consultant shall be and remain the property of City upon compensation of Consultant for its services herein described. 4.8. Assignment. Neither this Agreement, nor any duties or obligations under this Agreement, shall be assigned by Consultant without prior written consent of City. Any assignment or attempted assignment without such consent shall be void and unenforceable and may, at the sole discretion of City, result in the immediate termination of this Agreement. 4.9. Attorney's Fees. In the event any action is commenced to enforce or interpret the terms or conditions of this Agreement the prevailing party shall, in addition to any costs and other relief, be entitled to the recovery of its reasonable attorney's fees. 4.10. Entire A-qreement. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either verbal or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the matters contained herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges and agrees that no representation, inducements, promises or agreements, verbals or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other agreement, stipulation or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding on either party. HELIX ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING, INC CONTRACT FOR SERVICES MARCH 6, 2001 PAGE 8 4.11. Books and Records. Consultant shall maintain books and accounts of all project related costs and all expenses. Books shall be available at all reasonable times for examination by City at the office of Consultant. 4.12. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. CITY OF REDLANDS Dated: April 3, 2001 Pat Gilbreath, Mayor Attest: i' Lorri poyzer, C t �II*l C CON TA T Dated: " David W. Claycom , Pr sident EXHIBIT A PROJECT UNDERSTANDING PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Redlands is planning the development of a 115-acre sports park complex, to be located between San Bernardino Avenue and the Redlands Municipal Airport, bordered by Wabash Avenue on the east and the future alignment of Dearborn Street on the west. This is the City's first priority capital project for the year 2001. The subject site has been designated for several years as"Parks/Golf Courses" in the Redlands General Plan. A conceptual site plan has been completed, which includes the following elements: 0 14 soccer fields of varying size. * 2 basketball courts • a picnic and lawn area • a 6,000 seat soccer/football stadium • 4 arena-style soccer areas • 8 softball fields with batting cages and a food service/restaurant facility • 3 tot lots 0 2 concession stands 0 a maintenance building and adjoining yard area 0 surface parking lots along San Bernardino Avenue,Dearborn Street and Sessums Drive Outdoor lighting is proposed in several areas,however specific aspects of the lighting system(s) have not yet been developed. Grading and utilities plans are not currently available. City staff (Ron Meuter) indicated that a portion of the soccer field area in the northwestern quadrant will be designed as a stormwater detention basin, with sufficient capacity to handle upstream runoff as well as some site runoff. At this time, the City is considering a public/private partnership approach to this project. Discretionary approvals that will be required include a Conditional Use Permit and possibly an amendment to the City of Redlands Airport Land Use Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL SEWING AND ISSUES The nearly flat project site was operated as an orange grove for a number of years, and still contains numerous,fruit-bearing trees. It appears that the grove is not being actively managed. A San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (SBVMWD) water well facility (San Bernardino Avenue Well No. 1) occupies a small,rectangular area along the San Bernardino Avenue frontage; apparently,this is not part of the proposed project site. Another, older well site occurs to the east of the SBVMWD well and appears to be within the subject site. Open land,water detention basins,several single-family homes and industrial facilities border the project site on the north. The Redlands Municipal Airport is immediately north of those land uses. Mature avocado and orange groves are directly east, along the eastern side of Wabash Avenue. Cleared, fallow grove land lies directly opposite the project site,along the south side of San Bernardino Avenue. Groves and open land lie to the west. A new subdivision of single-family homes is partially occupied and under construction along the east side of Dearborn Street, south of San Bernardino Avenue and across from the southwest comer of the project site. The next nearest residential development is found several hundred feet west,west of Judson Street. � � � ict d t�rtrXin Based on a brief windshield survey of the project area, information in the City'sRequestOWPfor Proposals }sand conversationswith ,John Jaques and�. Ron Meuter of City staff,we have identified the folio en ' -cif concern for project: • Potential airbvf& ares resulting from a concentration of large numbers of people tri thin proximity to the Redlands Municipal Airport. The City Inas retained the consulting firm Shutt Moen Associates to evaluate these hazards and to assist the City in determiningher anamendment to the airport land use plan would be necessary to move forward with the park • Increased traffic, dally during peak event periods. 'Traffic, circulation n and parking` ging addressed by A Traffic Engmeenn&under contract to the City. issues are • Light and glare impacts potentially affecting nearby air traffic and nearby residential development • Noise ' pacts affecting nearby residential development clue to outdoor activities on site, and also due to'increased traffic along roadways that abut existing residential sees. • Tempo andPermanent air duality impacts, due to construction'period grading and hauling of export materials,and due to long-term traffic volumes. • Cuff--site utility sons and potential upgrades to "Istimg City facilities, During peak sporting events, such as a fully occupied soccer or football stadium event, softball and soccer league days and/or ts, etc., there will be unusually heavy demands for potable water and generation of wastewater. Further evaluation of existing off-site water and sewer facilities is needed to determine whether the average and peak demands of this project would require any upgrades ct existing The Proposed Pe of services described in Section 11I of proposal is based the above understanding of t Deed project and the preceding list of environmental issues. issues may be identified as part of the Initial Study and as a result of comments received during the public scoping period that will occur at the beginning of the environmental review process. 1- EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF SERVICES Tasks to be conducted to complete the Ew process are described Flow. J&§k-1;-Initiate Project and Cott*)&Dutiab"% HFLIX will conduct field surveys to document Anti phtAograph,the existing conditiotts iii the project arca. Our project manager will meet with City staff to review and discuss the project cl-wracteristics and objectives, anti to obtain copies of a site base snap, the proposed site plan, grading plan construction program and phasing requirements,technical reports and other project description inforn-kition available at the time. We will also obtain pertinent reference iruiterials such as,the City's Airport Land Use Plan and w, iter, sewer anti -.tntm drainage plans and analyses, HELIX will identify any significant gaps in available data that are considered essential for completion of the FIR, and work with the City to obtain the necessary inforn-tation. 54zqpjng-71'repare Initial Study.and Notice of Preparation HELIX will prepare an Initial Study (15) to identify the key enviromnentad issues of concern to be addressed in the EIR. This is an important part of the documentation effort, as it will provide facts and explanation to support the elimination of a number of topics from further review, while focusing the scope of the FIR on the i.ssues of primary concern, including issues identified in rcspnn,-,K- to the NOP. Infurindtion contained in the City's General Plan and Master Frivironmont.11 A.-,scs-.ment (MFA) is expected to be. sufficient to oddress, many of the IS questions. A HULIX biologist will condUCt a reconmAissance-level walkover survey to determine whether there is or could be habilat (or a sensitive Wildlife speLies, such as a burrowing owl, or 3 raptor. This proposal assurne-, negafiv� finding-. Correspondence will be sent to the San Bernardino County Museum to request records searches and an opinion as to whether the project site should be surveyed for cultural or paleontological resources- This proposal assumes that a cultural resources field survey and report Will be nccc-,sary and that the.rv-sultN of the cultural resource assessinent will be included in the EIR, HFLIX will purcha.se a report with the results of a govenunent database search to determine whether the subject site is listed by any agencies who moniforand enforce laws pertiuning to hazardous materials storage,generation,or disposal,as well as underground storage tanks_ TheInitial Study can be prepared on the basis of a preliminary project description, if a complete set of plans is not yet available, A sere Prichcck draft IS will be:submitted for reviewand conunent by City staff, and then revised,if netnied,to add rc,%,5 City comments, I IFLIX will also prepare anti submit a Notice of Preparation of an EIR (NM, which will contain all elements required under Sectiun 15082 of the State CF.QA Guidelines. The completed Initial Study will Be attached to the. NOP. The purpo!w of the NOP is to announce the commencement of the environmental review process for this project and to request comments concerning envirolunelital issues of concern and the scope of analysis to be incluJecl in the DFIR. HELIX will produce and submit t1tc required number of copies of the NOP/IS to the City, who will ,distribute it via certified mail to responsible and interested and public and quasi-public agencies, local property owners— and other persons and special interest group-,as specified by City staff, City staff (or the Coribulting Project Coordinator) will be ". ponsible for preparation,and pubhciition of 4 newspaper notice to announce the release of the NOP and the dates of the 30-day comnimt period. 111-1 &&ands 5vQntg Ret EIR Eromosal Seco on M-&Ve of Services Optional Task. Public Scoping Meeting HELD( will assist the City in organizing, announcing and conducting a public meeting to present the proposed project and to obtain comments concerning the environmental impact issues to be addressed in the EIR. Deliverables • One(1)screencheck NOP for City staff review/comment and up to 30 final NOPs to be circulated for public review and con-anent. • Three (3) screencheck draft Initial Studies for City staff review/comment. (Me "final" IS will be included in the Draft EIR). • One copy of a hazardous materials sites database search report Task 3: Prepare Screencheck Draft EIR HELIX will prepare an EIR to address the key environmental issues of concern and will include all elements required by the State CEQA Guidelines,in Article 9,Sections 15120 through 15131. Information and analyses to be provided in each EIR section are summarized below. Introduction and Executive Summary A brief summary of the proposed project characteristics will be presented and the purpose and intent of this project-level EIR will be explained. A matrix-style summary of the conclusions of the main body of the EIR will be presented,relative to project and cumulative impacts,recommended mitigation measures and level of impact significance remaining after incorporation of mitigation measures. Alternatives considered will be summarized,including identification of the environmentally superior alternative, any areas of known controversy will be identified and any environmental issues remaining to be resolved will be listed. Project Description Information in this section will be derived primarily from the project application plans and materials provided by the City staff. This section will include: • Name,address and phone number of project applicant • Name,address and phone number of Lead Agency(City)representative • Project Location-regional location,site location and boundaries(text and maps) • Statement of Project Objectives - applicant's development objectives and City planning goals and policies • Project Characteristics - text and illustrations describing principal land use and design concepts, development intensity, proposed parking, infrastructure, grading and excavation requirements, anticipated phasing,public/private partnerships,environmental mitigation strategies,etc. • Intended Uses of the EIR - identification of Lead and Responsible Agencies and the approvals for which this EIR is expected to be reviewed by those agencies. A draft project description will be submitted to City staff for review and approval to ensure that the environmental impact analyses accurately and fully address the complete scope of the project at the appropriate level of detail. 111-2 Redlands SjLorts Park EIR E=osal Section HI-S—c-o—of Services Deliverables 0 Three copies of a draft Project Description,including illustrations Environmental Setting This section of the EIR will generally describe the baseline physical conditions and relevant regional and local plans and programs that are pertinent to this project's environmental impact analysis. A brief history of land uses conducted at the project site will be presented. The physical environment that exists on and surrounding the project site will be textually described and illustrated. Environmental sensitivities identified during preparation of the Initial Study and public seeping process will be noted, e.g., any local utilities that are known to be damaged or over-capacity, local streets that are frequently congested beyond the City's level of service standards, sensitive nearby land uses, seismic or flood hazards,etc. Project(in)consistency with applicable local and regional plans will be briefly discussed. The reader will be referred to the relevant EIR section, where appropriate, for a more detailed analysis of project/plan consistency. It is anticipated that plans to be discussed will include the Signal Hill General Plan,regional air quality attainment plan,and the Los Angeles County Congestion Management Plan. Environmental Impact Analysis and Recommended Mitigation Measures This section of the EIR will present findings and recommendations regarding project-level and cumulative environmental impacts. The emphasis will be on the identification of significant impacts that would result from project implementation. Impact significance will be determined by defining the changes to the existing environment that would result from project implementation and comparing that changed environmental condition to a standard or threshold of significance. Impacts will be evaluated in proportion to their severity and probability of occurrence. Thresholds of significance will be based on any such standards that have been officially adopted by the City or other public agencies with primary authority relative to the impact in question. Thresholds may also include standards that are regularly applied in the review of major development projects by the City, standards developed by the City and HELIX specifically for this project, and/or those thresholds set forth in the Initial Study Checklist contained in the current State CEQA Guidelines. If the proposed project incorporates specific design or implementation measures intended to mitigate potentially significant environmental effects, such measures will be noted and an assessment of the project's "net impact significance" following implementation of the applicant's proposed mitigation measures will be made. Where impacts are found to be significant, HELIX will develop measures to mitigate such effects to below a level of significance, if feasible. All recommended mitigation measures will be defined to represent a close nexus between the measure and a legitimate governmental interest, and will be directly proportional to the level of impact resulting from the project. Our approach to the analysis of each of the primary environmental impact topics currently anticipated for this project is presented in the following pages. Please note that this preliminary range of topics may need to be altered as a result of the EIR scoping process. Aesthetics Ught and Glare) While development of a sports park complex would result in a substantial change in the visual character of the existing agricultural land use, the impact would not be considered significantly adverse, since the subject site is not within a recognized or designated scenic view corridor or viewshed, there are no unique geologic features or other distinguishing landmarks, and this would not be the first orange grove 111-3 Redlands S=fs Park EIR Proposal Section W-Scone of Services in this area to be converted to an urban use. This proposal,therefore, assumes that the EIR will not need to evaluate visual impacts associated with scenic resources or scenic views. Since the proposed project includes a variety of play fields that will be active and lighted, an assessment of potential adverse impacts due to night lighting is warranted. Light spillage that extends beyond the park boundaries could interfere with motorists' visibility along adjoining streets and may also adversely affect night flights at the nearby Redlands Municipal Airport. HELD(will consult with City staff and the private development entity to develop a conceptual description of the outdoor lighting system(s) to be utilized on site,and to identify the illumination criteria to be satisfied by the lighting plan. Performance standards to prevent significant light and glare impacts will be defined that can be incorporated into the precise lighting plans and evaluated by City staff at the plan check stage. Air Qualijy Based on technical analyses to be conducted by Giroux &Associates, HELIX will prepare an assessment of short-term,construction generated impacts and long-term, operational impacts. Construction impacts include fugitive dust, exhaust emissions from heavy equipment, machinery; trucks and work crew vehicles, and fumes associated with paving and application of exterior structural coatings (i.e., paints, water proofing agents,asphalt, etc.). According to Mr. Meuter, this project will likely result in an excess of grading materials that will need to be hauled by truck to a currently unknown location. Emissions from those truck trips will need to be evaluated as part of the construction impact assessment. Long-term impacts to be addressed include daily and peak period exhaust emissions generated by vehicles entering and leaving the site, and indirect emissions at electrical and natural gas generation facilities that would supply these power sources to the developed project site. Impact significance will be assessed in accordance with significance thresholds recommended by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, proximity of sensitive receptors and applicable City General Plan policies. Calculations of construction-related emissions will be based upon construction program details to be provided by the City and on existing and projected traffic volume data to be developed by WPA Traffic Engineering. A microscale screening analysis will be performed to determine whether federal or state one-hour standards for carbon monoxide pollutant would be exceeded during full capacity events at the football/soccer stadium or other heavy attendance time periods. Cultural Resources Based on their recent "overview" level assessment of the Santa Ana River watershed for the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, McKenna et al. found that there are numerous archaeological sites in the general area. This proposal, therefore, includes preparation of a complete Phase I Cultural Resources Survey Report by McKenna. Their tasks will include: (1) an archaeological records check at the San Bernardino County Museum, (2) limited historical research, including City, County and BLM files; (3) Native American consultation; (4) Field survey; and (5) report preparation. HELD(will summarize the results of that report in this section of the EIR and the complete report will be appended to the EIR. ois Short-term construction related impacts are normally mitigated to a less than significant level through compliance with local noise control ordinances that restrict the hours and days of operations to the least intrusive times of the day and week. This proposal assumes that construction noise impacts will be adequately addressed within the Initial Study and will not require further analysis in the EIR. 111-4 Redlands5j2orts Park EIR F-aWmo—sal Section M–Scope of Services Giroux &Associates will prepare a noise study to determine whether the proposed activities at the park would generate adverse noise levels at nearby residential or other noise sensitive areas. Noise levels generated by the types of outdoor athletic facilities included in the proposed project will be estimated on the basis of noise measurements taken by Giroux at similar facilities over the last few years. The measured data will be used as the basis for projecting future noise levels at affected noise sensitive areas. Noise associated with outdoor speakers will be based on project speaker design information. Potential traffic noise impacts affecting noise sensitive receivers along the roadways that would carry the most project-related traffic will also be evaluated. Existing and with-project roadway noise will be modeled on the basis of traffic volumes, posted speeds and vehicle n-dx data to be provided by the City's traffic consultant. The increase in noise associated with the additional traffic will be determined and potential noise impacts identified. The noise will be compared to the City's noise criteria to determine potential noise impacts. If significant noise impacts are projected,mitigation measures will be identified. HELD(will summarize the results of the Noise study in this section of the EIR. The complete report will be appended to the EIR. Hazards Because of the proximity to the City's Municipal Airport, the proposed project would potentially expose significant concentrations of people to potential air traffic hazards associated with incoming and departing flights. The City has retained Shutt Moen Associates to evaluate this hazard as well as this project's consistency with the adopted airport land use plan, and to make recommendations to prevent significant air traffic hazards. HELD(will summarize the results of the Shutt Moen study in this section of the EIR. The complete report will be appended to the EIR. Transportation/Traffic HELIX will summarize the results of the traffic, circulation and parking analysis to be prepared by VVPA Traffic Engineering,under separate contract to the City. The complete WPA report will be appended to features. Utilities/Service EygLen.12 Based on our preliminary conversation with City engineering staff(Mr.Meuter),it appears that the City's existing water,sewer and storm drainage systems have adequate capacity to accommodate the increased average demand that would result from development and operation of the proposed sports park complex. A new storm drain was recently completed adjacent to the project site that connects to an existing storm drain in Aviation Way. Mr. Meuter indicated that this new storm drain has been sized sufficiently to handle the additional runoff from the proposed park site. He also agreed that some additional analysis is warranted to determine whether existing water and sewer facilities are adequate to support peak demands that could substantially exceed"average" demands,such as during a full capacity event in the proposed soccer/football stadium. HELIX will work with the City's Municipal Utilities and Public Works Departments to assess the need for any upgrades to existing water or sewer facilities that would result in ground disturbing impacts. The results of this assessment will be presented in this section of the EIR. Staff also indicated that developed site runoff would likely be directed to the City's existing storm drain system located north of the project site in California Street, and also to the County's "California Bowl" detention basin facility to the southeast. A conceptual plan for on-and off-site water,sewer and storm drainage facilities has not been prepared, however, and further analysis is needed to determine whether any significant construction impacts could occur in connection with off-site utility facilities required for this project. M-5 Redlands Sports Lad EIR Proposal Section III-SMe Qf Services Cumulative Impacts This section will present a concise discussion of the combined impacts resulting from the implementation of the proposed project, together with other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects causing related impacts. HELIX will work with City staff to develop appropriate lists of related projects, and to obtain copies of planning documents that identify relevant growth projections and contain pertinent assessments of cumulative impacts to which this project will contribute. The impact analysis will focus on the project's contribution to any estimated significant cumulative impacts; mitigation measures will also focus on the project's contribution to overall solutions. This section will also note where the project's incremental effect would not be cumulatively considerable because of mandatory participation in a funding or other mitigation program designed to alleviate the cumulative impact. If the project's contribution to a significant impact is so minor that the environmental conditions would essentially be the same with or without the project,this will also be noted. Growth Inducing Impacts Ways in which the project could induce development of neighboring lands, direct or indirect population or economic growth or the construction of additional housing will be examined. Factors to be examined include extension of or major upgrades to necessary utilities and other infrastructure that would also remove development constraints for nearby properties; establishment of potential precedent setting governmental actions relative to allowable development intensities;amendments to local regulations that involve relaxation of certain planning or construction standards; substantial increase in long-term employment opportunities that could attract new residents as well as new businesses that support or compliment new businesses developed at the project site. Effects Not Found to Be Significant As required under Section 15128 of the CEQA Guidelines, this section of the EIR will briefly cite the reasons that various possible significant effects of the project were determined not to be significant and not analyzed within the EIR. This section will summarize the findings of the Initial Study and public scoping process and will refer the reader to the Appendix materials that contain the final Initial Study and other documentation concerning the scoping process. Alternatives to the Proposed Project The purpose of this EIR section is to define and evaluate potential alternative project scenarios that would avoid or reduce one or more of the significant environmental impacts that would result from the proposed project. Potential alternative project concepts that could be evaluated include alternative land use mixes and intensities,modified design concepts and/or a different site. A No-Project Alternative will also be examined, pursuant to Section 15126.6(e) of the CEQA Guidelines. This will be based on reasonable assumptions developed in consultation with City staff as to what land use scenarios are likely to occur if the proposed project is not approved, based on current plans and consistent with available infrastructure and community services. Since the proposed project is consistent with the land use policies contained in the City's general plan,evaluation of an alternative site is not recommended at this time. An alternative site scenario can be addressed,if requested by City staff,as an optional,additional cost item. HELIX will consult with City staff to define an appropriate range of alternatives that would avoid or mitigate those impacts found to be significant,and particularly to reduce or avoid any significant impacts that cannot be avoided if the proposed project is approved. A rationale for each alternative will be presented,including a discussion of the impacts it is intended to reduce or avoid,and an explanation of how the alternative implements or fails to implement the project objectives. Please note that the budget for this task assumes analysis of up to three alternatives, in a qualitative and comparative manner. 111-6 Redlands-Sporitg Pg&EIR P=osal Section III--&We p ,f Seruices Following a succinct narrative that compares the environmental impacts of each alternative with those of the proposed project, the comparisons will be summarized in a matrix format, for the reader's convenience. The environmentally superior alternative will then be identified. If it is the No-Project Alternative,an environmentally superior"project" alternative will also be identified. Report Preparation Resources This section will consist of three elements,as follows. Organizations and Persons Contacted All persons and organizations consulted with or from whom information was obtained during preparation of this EIR will be identified. EIR Preparation Staff The key City staff members responsible for managing the EIR process wiR be identified, along with the key members of the Environmental Consultant team and the key consultants for the project applicant, including a one-sentence summary of their professional experience and their roles in the EIR process. Biblioglapby All documents, maps and other information materials cited as references or otherwise used as an information source during preparation of the EIR will be listed. Appendix The Appendix will include the following: • NOP and responses to the NOP • Initial Study • Traffic study and air traffic hazards report prepared by the City's other consultants • Cultural Resources technical report • Calculations and computer model assumptions utilized in the noise and air quality studies • Hazardous materials sites database search report • Other documents,meeting minutes, correspondence, etc., that record significant communications or environmental determinations during this environmental review process. The appendix will be bound separately from the Draft EIR,to reduce the bulk of the main document,and also to facilitate selective distribution of those reports to those who have some statutory authority relative to the subject matter or to those with a special interest. The appendix will contain the following and possibly other elements. Deliverables • Three(3)copies of a Screencheck Draft EIR • Three(3)copies of a Screencheck Draft Appendix 111-7 Redlands�wts Park,EIR F=sal Section 1H-kc-gp—e of S- es Task 4: &s to !C& Staff Comments, P—r 5creench ck D t E for Uproval by are Revised e of IR QbLs Enyi onYnental Review Committee After receipt of all City staff comments on the screencheck document, HELIX will make any necessary revisions and submit a revised screencheck document for review and approval by the City's Environmental Review Committee(ERC). Deliverables * Ten(10)copies of a 2nd Screencheck Draft EIR,with five sets of the appendix Task 5; Produce and Distribute Notice of Completion and Draft HELIX will revise the EER in accordance with the direction of the City's ERC and will then produce and submit the required number of copies of the public review Draft EIR and Notice of Completion (NOC) form to City staff. Based on direction provided in the attachment to the RFP, it is assumed that the City will be responsible for mailing copies of the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse and to other public agencies,persons and groups included on this project's distribution list. (This task could also be assigned to the consulting Project Coordinator,at the City's option.) The document will be circulated for a 45-day review and comment period. Technical appendix will not be distributed with the Draft EIRs, due to the added bulk and expense and the expectation that very few recipients would need or be interested in that information. A.transmittal will be sent with all Draft EIRs that will indicate how and where copies of Appendix materials can be purchased,if desired. Deliverables The number of copies of the Draft EIR that will be needed is not known at this time; this proposal assumes that up to-30 copies of the Draft EIR and the 10 copies of the Appendix will be provided. HELIX will also provide one digital copy of the Draft EIR document and one unbound,reproducible version for use by City staff,as needed, Task 6- P=are PreliminAa Responses to !Qomments (RTC), Screencheck Final EM LF_EIR), and Mitigaflan Monitoring and_R_eporting Program OJMRP) Immediately following the end of the 45-day public review period,HELIX will prepare written responses to all comments received concerning the adequacy of the Draft EIR,to be included in a screencheck Final EIR. The Final EIR will incorporate the Draft EIR by reference and will include an introduction section, copies of all comments received on the Draft EIR, written responses to those comments, and a section containing any minor clarifications,corrections or revisions to the Draft EIR that may be determined to be necessary as a result of one or more comments. Since it is impossible to predict the number and complexity of comments that will need to be responded to, a budget allocation of $5,000 has been established for this task. If less effort is required, the City will be billed only for the time and expenses actually involved. If more effort is required, HELIX will notify the City and obtain authorization to exceed the$5,000 limit or to make other provisions to complete this task within this limit. Pursuant to Section 15097 of the State CEQA Guidelines,a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) will be prepared to define the roles, responsibilities, timing and methods of monitoring and ensuring successful completion of all mitigation measures included in the Final EIR. Deliverables Three(3)copies of a screencheck Final FIR and three copies of a screencheck MMRP. HI-8 Redlands 5jzorft Park EIR EMosal Section IR—&pjLe oge zees Task 7. P=am Fi1W EIR and Final MMRP for Action by Lead AgeM HELD(will revise the Final EIR and MMRP in accordance with City staff comments and then produce the required number of copies of these documents to be distributed to the City's Planning Commission, for review and recommendation to the City Council. HELIX will make revisions to either or both documents, if directed by the Planning Commission, and will provide City staff with the required number of copies for City Council review and approval. Following the Council's certification of the Final EIR and MMRP,HELD(will make any final revisions,if required by the Council. Deliverables • One unbound,reproducible version of the Final EIR and the MMRP,one digital copy of each, and 20 bound copies of the Final EIR and NfMRP for Planning Commission review. • One unbound,reproducible version of the Final EIR and the MMRP,one digital copy of each, and 20 bound copies of the Final EIR and NIMRP for City Council review. • If any final revisions are required by the City Council, HELIX will provide one unbound, reproducible version of the Council-certified Final EIR and the MMRP,and one digital copy of each. Task 8: Attend Meetingl gAd Public Hearings The HELIX project manager and the Project Coordinator will attend meetings with City staff and will also attend public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. We will be prepared to present EIR findings and to answer questions regarding the project and the EIR. This proposal assumes attendance by the HELD(project manager at three meetings with City staff, one meeting with the City's ERC, two public hearings before the City Planning Commission and one public hearing before the City Council. Our proposed budget allocates three hours per meeting attended by the EIR project manager. It is further assumed that the Project Coordinator will be requested to attend five meetings with City staff and two public hearings. An average of three hours per meeting is included in the proposed budget for attendance by the Project Coordinator. Travel and meal expenses associated with attending meetings and hearings will be billed on a time and expenses basis. Task 9; Project Management Throughout the environmental review process, HELIX will exercise project management oversight and facilitate communications between our project team,the City and their consultants to successfully achieve project objectives for schedule, budget and product quality. This will involve coordination and supervision of the consultant team,development of and revisions to schedules, agendas,notices,memos, staff reports and other communications, and formulation of strategies concerning analytical and process issues, communications protocols, meetings and hearings and general problem-solving. Quality assurance and CEQA compliance review are management tasks that are also included in this scope of services. M-9 q-:-"T Project Coordinator Tasks As requested in the City's RFP,this scope of services includes various duties to be performed by a Project Coordinator, as an extension of City staff. Tasks are expected to include, but may not be limited to, the following: • Prepare,publish and distribute notices,newspaper ads and documents • Prepare staff reports, resolutions and various forms of written correspondence and oral communications • Prepare CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations(if necessary) • Work with City staff and their private partner team on design,financing,and community issues • Make presentations at public meetings and hearings • Manage Conditional Use Permit and Airport Land Use Plan Amendment processes M-10 EXHIBIT C PROJECT TEAM Our project,team was selected with the intent of matching consulting skills and experience with the project characteristics and environmental issues. Each of the consulting firms that comprise our team is profiled below,and their professionals who will fulfill the key consulting roles and will be responsible for the various work products are identified. Full resumes for the key consultants are provided at the end of this section. References will be provided upon request. HELD(ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING,INC. Prime Consultant-EIR Preparation and Management HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. (HELIX) was founded in 1991 to provide a variety of professional consulting services to private and public sector entities engaged in activities subject to federal and/or state regulatory compliance. We are specialists in the preparation and management of environmental impact assessments to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). We also conduct numerous biological surveys,wetland delineations, develop and implement habitat restoration plans, and prepare and process permits required to comply with federal and state endangered species acts,the federal Clean Water Act,the State Porter-Cologne Act, California Fish and Game Code, and various regional habitat conservation and watershed management plans. Our environmental scientists, planners, GIS analysts and project managers conduct research and analysis, identify and map environmental constraints, prepare technical reports and planning studies, develop and manage regulatory compliance programs and processes, and provide information and guidance to clients with respect to the identifying and minimizing the environmental consequences of their project design. Examples of our related project experience include: • Mission Trails Park Multi-Use Staging Area • Santee Town Center Community Park • San Dieguito River Parks Focused Planning Area Studies • Santa Cara River Master Park Plan • Kit Carson Park Mitigation Monitoring • Winchester Park Expanded IS/MND • Ramona Community Park MUT' • Mission Beach Boardwalk Widening EIR/EA • San Diego Air Commerce Center EIR/EA Randy A. Nichols, AICP, Senior Project Manager will be assigned as the EIR Project Manager. Randy has more than 21 years of professional land use planning experience throughout southern California,and has specialized in environmental planning and impact assessment pursuant to CEQA and NEPA for more than 15 years. Mr. Nichols has been providing consulting services to the City of Redlands for the last several months,and City staff are familiar with his capabilities and approach to CEQA compliance. He is knowledgeable of the City's environmental planning database and project review process. Based on this recent and current experience, Randy is uniquely well qualified to manage this EIR and be the main point of contact with City staff. Mr.Nichols will be supported by the veteran HELIX team of senior managers, environmental planners, graphics, GIS, word processing, production and clerical staff. An exhibit that illustrates the firm's current organizational structure is presented on the next page. ORGANIZATION CHART HELIX Environmental Phnnin�,Y, Inc. SII David (.1-IN-Comb, AICP President F*NVIRONINIEN YAL 1310LOGICAL SUPPORTSERVICES I'LANNING GROUP (--'sElWICFS (;I?0UF' GROUP Lisa Capper, IJ). loni I luffnian, V.R Kristin IZLIff3lO Manager manager Manager Tamara S. Ching Barry Jones Mary McGee Senior Project Manager Senior Consulting Biologist Graphics Coordinator Randy Nichols W LwTy Sward Neil Liddie Senior Project Manager Senior Biologist Production Manager Kim Baranek Steve Neudecker,PED. Ampha Keody Senior Project Manager Senior Project Manager Asst. Business Manager( Debra PtdAccounting Dennis Martin Technical Coordinator Environmental Specialist Mylaine Perry DeborahPudoff Office Manager/ Ellen Darnell Biologist II Human Resources Senior Consultant ScottTaylor Jason Sokol Dave Potter Biologist II GIS Analyst Senior Consultant Derek Langsford,PhD. Elizabeth Avera Andrea Bitterling Biologist II GIS Analyst Senior Environmental Planner GregMason Pamela Hartsock,Ph.D. Tim Belzman Biologist I Technical Editor/ Senior Environmental Planner Renee0wens Word Processing Amy Bridgeman Biologist I Raquel Reola Environmental Planner SaffyTrnka Receptionist Biologist I Tuba Zia JustinFischbeck Office Manager/ Associate Biologist Orange County Office Ted Grantham Assistant Biologist Darrell Grant Landscape Technician Febrifi71-1,2001 Redlands Sports Park EIR aWaLal Section H-Eng.kct Team CIVIC SOLUTIONS,INC. Project Coordinator Civic Solutions, Inc. is a community development consulting firm providing comprehensive planning and entitlement project management services to municipalities, special districts and other public agencies. The firm is established around the principle that community planning and development ultimately serve the public interest. Civic Solutions,Inc. is staffed by experienced professionals who have an extensive background in public sector service. The team has a proven history of working together to serve municipal planning agencies and citizen groups. The firm presently has on-call municipal planning services contracts with the cities of Ontario, Brea, Irvine, Huntington Beach, Rancho Santa Margarita, Norwalk, Bellflower, Imperial Beach, San Gabriel and San Clemente. Led by Principal Tom Merrell, AICD and guided by the company philosophy that planning is for people, Civic Solutions is ideally equipped to successfully complete community development projects to the satisfaction of our clients and the communities they serve. A complete description of services and client projects can be found on the firm's web site at www.civicsolutions.com. KEY QUALIFICATIONS The project coordinator will be Matthew Bassi, Senior Planner. Mr. Bassi is accomplished in his knowledge of municipal planning, zoning and development laws, state (CEQA) and federal (NEPA) environmental regulations, and municipal code standards. He is skilled in preparing resolutions and ordinances in addition to plan checking construction and landscape plans. His previous experience includes management of the City of Chino's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, management of the preparation of a 54-acre downtown revitalization mater plan, and contract management for the preparation of General Plan projects. Mr. Bassi has worked on a variety of long- range planning assignments such as General Plan elements, specific plans, and zoning ordinance and specific plan amendments. Mr.Bassi is currently responsible for the firm's Ontario office and supervises project management for the firrn`s contract with the City of Ontario. He will have the resources and staff of Civic Solutions, Inc. to support his role in this contract. GIROUX&ASSOCIATES Air Oualft and Noise Impact Studies Giroux & Associates (G&A) has been providing aerometric assessment services (air quality, acoustics, meteorology,airborne hazards/toxics and airborne nuisance such as dust and odors)for over twenty(20) years. Witl-dn the last two decades, the firm has participated in over 1,500 environmental investigations. Specialized services include ambient pollution and noise monitoring, computerized air pollution and noise dispersion modeling,emissions source testing,inert tracer gas field studies,APCD/AQMD permit preparation and processing, expert witness testimony and regulatory agency liaison. Giroux has developed a considerable database of information concerning noise levels and air quality impacts generated at outdoor recreation facilities. Representative project experience includes: • Municipal Swim Stadium Relocation,Santa Monica • McPherson Sports Complex,Orange • Parks&Open Space Master Plan EIR,Santa Monica • Prospect Park Sports Complex,Orange • Kennedy Community Park Sports Complex,Napa H-3 Redlands 5ctj PW*EIR E=osd Sectim R-,EnR1kct Team • Shadow Run Skate Park Noise Study,West Covina • Belmont Park Expansion,Orange • Jack Bulik Sports Park Expansion,Fontana • Chapparosa Sports Park Lighting Impact,Laguna Niguel • Central High School Football Stadium MR,Fresno MCKENNA,ET A.L Cu1rl and Meontological Resources Assessment McKenna et al,established in 1989,is a Women Business Enterprise (WBE) firm owned and operated by Jeanette A. McKenna, M.A. and Principal Investigator, and recognized by the State of California as a Small Business/Sole Proprietorship. Ms. McKenna has over 20 years of experience with an emphasis in Cultural Resource Management (CRM) and holds certifications from the Society of Professional Archaeologists (SOPA) in Field (prehistoric) and Historic Archaeology. Ms. McKenna served on the SOPA Board of Directors from 1993 to 1997 and is currently listed as a Registered Professional Archaeologist(RPA). Ms. McKenna has taken post-graduate courses in Archaeology,History,and Land Use Planning at both Arizona State University and the University of California,Riverside. McKenna et al.employs an*"applied archaeological approach" in documenting and reporting on cultural resources. This approach emphasizes a balance between practical planning and the management of resources while maintaining a project-specific approach to costs and schedules. McKenna et al. maintains a professional staff capable of handling all levels of cultural resource investigations, including Prehistoric and Historic Archaeology, Rock Art studies, Historic Architectural Studies, general histories,peer reviews, and EIR/EIS documentation. McKenna et al. also has staff with expertise in analysis and report preparation. The McKenna et al. main office is located in Whittier, California (see below), providing both office and laboratory facilities. These facilities provide in-house research and analysis, house specialized field equipment, data management systems, and a relatively extensive library and archives. A few examples of her extensive similar project experience are listed below. • Principal Investigator/Project Manager, General Cultural Resources Overview for the Proposed SBVMWD Improvements Project Area,San Bernardino,California. (McKenna et al.494) • Principal Investigator/Project Manager, Class III Investigations for the Proposed Big Bear Zoo Relocation,Fawnskin,San Bernardino County,California. (McKenna et al.503) • Principal Investigator/Project Manager, 80 Acre Archaeological Survey in San Bernardino County, California- (McKenna et al.525) • Principal Investigator/Project Manager, Responses to Letters, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, San Bernardino County,California. (McKenna et al.532) • Principal Investigator/Project Manager, Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring Program for the Oak Valley Estates Property,Beaumont,Riverside County,California. (McKenna et al.515) H-4 EXHIBIT D SCHEDULE A tentative schedule for completing the EIR process in eight (s) montlis is illustrated on the next page. please note the following key aspects of ti-ds schedule. Review of screencheck documents by City stiff;uid the Environmental Review Committee ary planned, prior to pubbcationaxcl di-strNition of the,public review Draft EIR. The first Planning Commission hearing is set to occur approximately 30 days into the 45-day Draft EIR review licrind. T1v purpme of this liciring would be to take public romments coneArming the,adequary of the Draft EIR and to provide clarifications in mspome to questions, so that concerned Citizens tan prepare more specific and more focused written corturtents before the end of the public review period. 'mis aiso gives the Pudming cot umissio.-1 chance to request clarificatiotis from HEM and the Project Coordinator.so that they we in a better position to make comaients and prepare their recortinvndations to the City Council at their second hearing. The second Pliuming Commission hearing is scheduled for two weeks after the fums hearing,just prior to the end of the 4,15-day review period. At this hearing,the Cornmimsion can provide a list of sPm, fic c0olmmits concerning the adequacy of the Draft FIR that MIA would respond to in the Final EIR, along with rimpon.ses to other public'and agency corntnents. fly holding the Plantutig Com inisjajj hearings during the 45-day review l*riod,the time frau*to complete the FIR is rMuced by sewiTal week-%,compared to hniding one or both mccling,;after the review petind ends. Preparation of the F M, Mitigatiori Monitoring and Reporting ProgrAm and related staff rel)ort!,, resolutions,fuuAings,ew. would occur on A parallel track,shortly after the second Y"Jannim,Commission hearing. These documents would beready for distribution to the City council 1110TV than A week before their scheduled public hmriung to certify the Final FTR. City of Redlands Sports Park EIR Schedule Tasks and Milestones Duration Elapsed Time (bu6inm days, (Weeks) unless otherwise noted) Irtidate frn t and Compile Database 14. Prepare Initial Study and Notice of Preparation(NOP 10 1-2 Cit Staff Review atid Coiiunent 4 3 Make Revisiom and Prr)dure Copies of IS and NOP 4 4 30-Day Public Review And Corruneilt Period 30 calendar clays 5-9 .Verrencheck Draft FIR(SVEIR)Ph7u."Hon Prepare Project Dcw—ription 5 3 City Staff Review and Curnment 5 4 Prepare Project Di�. xiption'Ctuingri and Other FIRSectiom 40 5-12 Pre,p",wd Jlmdvcr Dkoft EIR and NUC _fj!)L4taff Review and.Coinment on SDEIR -10 '13-14 Make Revisions anti Produce Copies for FRC Approval ti 15-16 Fnvimnmt-ntal Review Curnmittee I learing 1 18 Make Revisions and Produce Draft EIR and NUC Copies 6 18-19 I-IrbAc fiesiew of Aafi EM 45-Day Review and Comment Period 45 calendar days First Planning Commission He;grin 1 24 Second PLuu-inn Cnmynission Hearing1 26 f'nrpwvre and Certify Final FIR Prepare Draft Responses to Comments,MMRP and FFI R 15 1 25-27 Prepare Draft GENA Findings and 10 26 Statement of Overriding Cor%sidcra tions(.SOC) Lity Staff Review and Comment 5 28 Makr Revisions and Produce Final EIR, MMR11, Fitidings 5 29'-.7 and Ste:for City Council A2proval City Council Hearing to Certify Fitial EIR and Approve 41 Vrolect Produce and Submit Final ElF for City Files, Including City = 5 32 Council Comments COST ESTMUTE—Rediands Sports Park EIR and Project Coordination Tulle Staff Rate Hours Cad SUBTOTALS Task 1-Initiate Project and Compile Database Senior Project Mgr. $110 9 $380 Sr.Environ.Planner $65 a $520 Subtotal,Task 1: Clerical support $35 6 $210 $1,610 Task 2-Prepare Notice of Preparation and Initial Study, Senior Project Mgr. $110 - 16 $1.760 Sr.Environ.Planner $65 32 S2,090 Graphics Coordinator $70 4 $280 Graphics Specialist $55 8 $00 Word Processing $45 16 $720 Subtotal,Task 7-* $5,7M Task 3-Prepare Screencluck,Draft ER Introduction and Emoutive Summary Senior Project Mgr. $110 8 $BW Environmental Planner $55 8 $440 Project Description Senior Project Mgr. $110 20 $Z= Environmental Setting Sr.Environ.Planner $65 16 $1,040 Senior Project Mgr. slid 4 $440 Aesthetics qJ&and Clare) Sr.Environ.Planner $65 16 S1A40 Senior Project Mgr- $110 8 $880 Air Qualify Giroux:&Associates $115" Sr.Environ Planner $65 8 $m Cultural Resources McKenna at al, $3A30 Environmental Planner $55 8 $440 Hazards Environmental Specialist $75 24 $1,1100 Noise Giroux&Associates $U" Sr.Environ.Planner $65 8 SSW Transportathen/Traffic, Sr.Environ.Planner 65 16 $17,120 Utilitiest'Servics Systems Sr.Environ,Planner $65 16 $1,040 Growth Inducing Impacts Sr.Environ.Planner $65 8 $520 Cumulative impacts Senior Project Mgr. $110 a $880 Sr.Environ,Planner $65 16 $1,040 Effects Not round to Be Significant Environmental Planner $55 6 $330 Alternatives to Proposed Project Senior Project Mgr. $110 12 $1,320 Sr.Environ.Planner $65 16 $1,040 Graphics Production Graphics Coordinator $70 16 $1,120 Graphics/CIS Analyst $55 32 $1,760 Documentproduction Production Manager $70 20 $1A00 Word Processor $45 40 $1,800 Subtotal,Task 3: U6,340 Task 4-Respond to City Staff Consiments,Prepare Senior Project Mgr. $110 8 $880 Revised SDEIR for ERC Approval Env.Specialist $75 4 Wild Sr.Environ.Planner $65 20 $1,30 Graphics/GLS Analyst $55 4 $220 Production Manager $65 4 $260 Word Processor/Clerical $45 8 $360 Subtotal,Task C $3,320 Task 5-Produce Notice of Completion and Draft EIR Senior Project Mgr. $110 4 $440 Sr.Environ.Planner $65 8 $520 Production Manager $65 8 $520 Word Processor/Clerical $45 16 $720 $2,200 Subtotal,Task 5: Task 6-Prepare Prelim Responses to Comments,Final EIR and Senior Project Mgr. $110 20 $4.000 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program' Sr.Environ.Planner $65 20 $11000 Subconsultants $5W Word Processing/ClericalProcessing/Clerical $45 16 $720 Subtotal,Task 6: $6,220 Task 7-Prepare FEM and Find MMRP for Action Senior Project Mgr. $110 6 $660 by Lead Agency Subtotal,Task 7. Word I'mcessing/Clerical $45 8 $360 VIAW Task 8-Attend Meetings With City Staff&Public Hearings Senior Project Mgr. $110 30 $3,300 Praia&Coordinator $85 28 $2,380 Subconsultants $5W Subtotal,Task& $6,180 Task 9-Project Martagernent/Q.A. Principal $140 16 $2,240 Subtotal,Task 9: Senior Project Mgr, $110 40 $0110 $6AW Project Coordinator Tasks Project Coordinator $85 60 $511W lislim Reimbursable Expenses(Do—reproduction,reprographics• postage,mileage,bar,film and phatoo)a $2.800 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST' $56,710 'This is a ort- k based on On number ofhators shown. ffa greater level ofeffort is necessary,we will notify the City Prior to reaching this thriff, and would exceed this bWV only ifinthiorard in advance by City staff 2 71m,esomaer imseums dwfsffmwgqufintUm and number of pages the deliverables to be produadjur Mis IonvecE We will notify the City in advance ifevIomses will crecial do estimate.AAftional toomse charges,would occur only if au in advance by City staff 30.NON 05 pages 10-Revised SDM for ERC Review 0200 pgs 3-Screeticheck MMRP 0 10 pages 3-Screenchedi Dean initial ShoSes 030 pages 5-A far ERC Review 0 150 pages 20w Revised PEIR78 for PC Review 1450 pages 3-First Draft Project Descriptions*10 pages 30-Draft EIR for Public Review 0 200 pages 20-MMRPa for PC Review a In pages 3-Screenched,Draft EIR 0 200 pages 10-Appendix for Public Review 0 150 pages 20-Revised FEWs for CC Review 050 pages 3-Pan Draft Apperafier Materials 01W EUM 3-Screendbeek Final SIR 050. - 20-MMRPS(w CC Review 0 10 pax" 'Cash for addiffinuff sentices,rapeseed by flat City will be billed on a time and expenses basis,in accordance with current hourly rates for fix consultants who art bmuluct CURRENT SCHEDULE OF FE01 Consulting Services Consulting services performed by HELD( typically include, but are not necessarily limited to, office, field, meetings, hearings and travel time. Consulting services for expert witness review,deposition,and/or testimony will be provided at one and one-half times our professional rates. Direct Costs Certain identifiable direct costs will be charged to the project at cost plus ten percent Examples of directcosts include subconsultants,vehicle or equipment rentals, airplane and train fares, parking, per them and lodging, communications,reproduction,and supplies. Automobile mileage will be charged at forty cents per mile. A 4-wheel drive premium will be charged at $25.00 per project day. Facsimile transmissions will be charged at$1.00 per page sent. There will be additional charges for plotting,color printing,aerial photographs and GPS services. PUment Invoices will be submitted monthly and will include charges for work in progress.Payment of these invoices is due upon their receipt.A charge of one and one-half percent per month will be added to any outstanding balance not paid within thirty days unless the contract calls for a different payment schedule. Professional Rates Current hourly rates for consulting services: Principal $140.00 Group Manager $125.00 Senior Scientist $115.00 Senior Project Manager $110.00 Senior Biologist $105.00 Environmental Specialist 11 $100.00 Project Manager $85.00 Environmental Specialist 1 $75.00 Biologist 11 $75.00 Administrative Manager $75.00 Technical Coordinator $70.00 Graphics Coordinator $70.00 Senior Environmental Planner $70.00 Biologist I W.00 Production Manager $65.00 Assistant Production Manager $55.00 Associate Biologist $55.00 Environmental Planner $55.00 GIS Analyst $55.00 Technical Editor $55.00 Environmental Analyst $45.00 Assistant Biologist $45.00 Word Processor $45.00 Biological Technician $35.00 Clerical $35.00 Laborer $25.00 HELIX CIVIC SOLUTIONS,INC. Schedule of Fees Civic Solutions,Inc.provides consulting services at the following hourly rates: Principal $105.00 Manager 95.00 Senior Project Manager 90.00 Senior Planner 85.00 Senior Transportation Analyst 85.00 Associate Planner 72.00 Associate Transportation Analyst 72.00 Assistant Planner 60.00 Associate Transportation Analyst 60.00 Planning Technician 45.00 Secretarial Services 35.00 Work performed on a time and materials basis will be billed monthly and will be due within 15 days. Reimbursable Expenses: • Blue fine reproduction of plans a Large duplication or document publishing projects 0 Specialized graphics projects a Messenger and overnight delivery services GIROUX & ASSOCIATES STANDARD SCHEDULE OF FEES VALID THROUGH DECEMBER 31,2001 LABOR CLASSIFICATION HOURLY BILLING RATE Senior Scientist $90.00 Project Analyst $50.00 Word Processor $40.00 Data/Field Technician $35.00 All materials and other direct charges will be billed at cost plus a l0% fee for general and administrative (G&A) services. All automotive project travel will be billed at $ 0.301mile, ($ 0.40fmile if four-wheel drive off-road travel is required). McKenna et al. History/Archaeology/Architecture/Paleontology Jeanette A. McKenna, M.A. Owner and Principal Investigator Reg. Professional Archaeologist 2000-2001 BILLING RATES* Principal Investigator(Jeanette A. McKenna) $ 65.00 hr. Project Manager/Field Director $ 50.00 hr. Architectural Historian $ 55.00 hr. Field Crew (Archaeological) $40.00 hr. Laboratory Assistants (Archaeological) $ 37.00 hr. Misc. Office Support(Graphics,Typing, etc.) $37.00 hr. *=These rates may be adjusted on a project-by-project basis, as needed. All cost proposals must be approved by Jeanette A. McKenna, Owner/Principal. MISC. EXPENSES" Archaeological Records Check (average) $ 250.00 Photography(average per roll/color) $ 20.00 Photography(average per roll/Black&White) $ 30.00 Historic Research Access Fees Varies Mileage (adjusted on a project-by-project basis) $ 32 mi. Report Production/Reproduction (average per copy) $ 20.00. additional costs for field/lab supplies are generally incorporated into individual project descriptions, as needed.