HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_2-1991_CCv0001.pdf AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR THE REVISION OF CALIFORNIA
STREET LANDFILL REPORT OF
DISPOSAL SITE INFORMATION
This AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this 16th day
of January, 1991r
City of Redlands Municipal
by and between Utilities Department herein
after referred to as nOWNER"
Kleinfelder , Inc .
and hereinafter referred to as
"ENGINEER"
In consideration of the mutual promises , covenants and con-
ditions hereinafter set forthr the parties do hereby agree as
follows:
A.RTICIg 1 - ENG&qEj_ME�NT
q_ENGI.NEER
engages the ENGINEER and the ENGINEER
1 .1 The OWNER hereby
hereby accepts the engagement to perform engineering
services in connection with the preparation of the
revision of California Street Landfill Report of Dis-
posal Site Information. shall be done in a
1 .2 All services under this AGREEMENT ents that the
professional manner , and ENGINEER repres and the
firm employs those with the demonstrated skill
professional expertise necessary to provide high quality
services under this AGREEMENT . to the level Of
1.3 The ENGINEER shall be responsible, other practicing
intained by
competency presently ma
providing the same type of ser-
professional engineers
vices for the professional and technical soundness ,
reports , designs , drawings ,
materials
accuracy and adequacy of all services and
and other
specifications ,
furnished under this AGREEMENT
2
R will perform the services in connection
2.1 The ENGINEE s defined in Attachment A, Scope of
with the project a
Work . ional services may be provided by the
2 .2 The following addit
ENGINEER when requested and approved by the OWNER in
writing:
1 . Construction survey.
2 . Additional copies of plans and specifications .
3 . Bidding services .
4 . Construction services.
5 . Construction inspection services .
6 . miscellaneous services not specified elsewhere in
the AGREEMENT.
ARTICLE 33 - REak00S-!R1L-1TIKS--gZ THE OW_NE�R_
will place at the disposal of the ENGINEER all
3 .1 The OWNER information pertinent to the Project,
available reports and any other data relative
including previous
to the Project. vide access to and make all provisions
3 .2 The OWNER will Pro upon public and private lands
for the ENGINEER to enter perform his services
as required for the ENGINEER to
under this AGREEMENT.
3 .3 The OWNER will Provide all environmental assessments or
or this project and not other-
impact reports required f y the
wise specifically required to be provided b
ENGINEER. will designate in writing a person to act as
3 .4 The OWNER respect to the services
the OWNER' s representative with h person to
to be performed under this Agreement , suc
have complete authority to transmit instructions ,
ion, interpret and define the Owner' s
receive informat to materials,
policies and decisions with respect
equipment , elements and systems pertinent to the ser-
vices covered by this AGREEMENT.
ARTICLE 4- - PERIOD .OF SKV!qE
d with the engineering services
4 .1 The ENGINEER shall procee ' th the schedule
set forth in Article 2 in accordance wi
defined in Attachment A.
4 .2 The ENGINEER shall proceed with the services under this
AGREEMENT promptly and will prosecute them diligently.
-2-
AaT-!9Lq TO THE-CONqU!!T&N-T
ices performed under Article 2 , OWNER will
5 .1 For the sery INEER on a time and materials basis at the
pay the ENG n Attachment C. Schedule of Fees .
hourly rates shown i r014 .
However , total payment shall not exceed $25
services requested by the OWNER
5 .2 payment for additional be in accordance with a separately
per Article 2 .2 will ordance with the hourly fees
negotiated fee or in acc
shown in Attachment C . Schedule of Fees .
point 75-percent of budgeted
5 .3 ENGINEER agrees that at the the
expended for each scope project,
costs have been WNER in writing , including a
ENGINEER will notify the 0 , percent complete , analysis
the
brief report on job status nses to complete
of budget, and envisioned expe exceeded
contractual effort - Budgets shall not be
except if previously approved by OWNER.
ER shall bill the OWNER monthly by submitting
5 .4 The ENGINE services performed, who
an invoice indicating the d the detailed cost Of all
performed the services , an
services including backup material, if requested .
Dy OWNER to ENGINEER shall be made within 30
Payments I roval of ENGINEERtS herein-
days after receipt and app,
above invoice, by warrant payable to the ENGINEER. iting
and payments shall be made in wr
All notices , bills personal delivery or by mail .
and may be given by by mail should be
Notices , bills and payments sent
addressed as follows:
TO OWNER: CITY OF REDLANDS tment
Municipal Utilities Depar
p . 0. Box 3005
2 E . Citrus Avenue
Redlands CA 92373
To ENGINEER: KLEINFELDER, INC .
1370 Valley vista Drive
suite 150 91765
Diamond Bar CA
deemed given
addressed, such notices shall be In all other
When so tes Mail.
upon deposit in the United Sta yments shall be deemed
instances , notices , bills and pa may be
given at the time of actual delivery. Changes
in the names and addresses of the person to whom
made s are to be given by giving
notices , bills and payment
notice pursuant to this paragraph.
-3-
NJ CaTLqN
&Rq�j
Nqqtl
_a Alla
6 .1 ENGINEER shall maintain worker' s compensation insurance
and , in addition, shall maintain insurance to protect
for damage due to bodily injury,
OWNER from claims death and claims for injury to or
personal injury, Or
tangible property while performing the
destruction of ENT . Said public
services covered by this AGREEM ance shall be in a
liability and property damage insur er occur-
minimum combined single limit Of $1,00010100 P
The OWNER shall be named a primary additional
rence . le for Public liability and
insured on insurance coverac provide OWNER with
property damage . The ENGINdR shall
a certificate evidencing such insurance coverage .
to maintain professional liability
6 .2 ENGINEER agrees OWNER
insurance pursuant to this paragraph to protect
from negligent acts , errors or omissions of a profes-
sional nature; the total aggregate of ENGINEER' S pro-
fessional liability insurance coverage shall be a mini-
mum of $50 ,000 or the Engineer ' s total estimated fee , as
shown in Attachment C: project Budget, whichever is
greater . indemnify, hold harmless and defend
6 .3 ENGINEER agrees to
and any and all of their elected officials ,
OWNER ers , and employees from and
officers , agents , engine
against all claims, loss , damage, charge or expense , to
may be put or subjected to
which they or any of them misconduct
arising out of or resulting from.any willful
or negligent act or actions , omission or failure to act
on the part of the ENGINEER, his contractors , his
or indirectly employed by any
suppliers , anyone directly . ssions any of
of them or anyone for whose acts or Omi
them may be liable in the performance of the services
described in this AGREEMENT .
7 .1 In the event of any legal action brought by either party
against the other to enforce any of the obligations
hereunder or arising out of any dispute concerning the
terms and conditions hereby created, the losing party
shall pay the prevailing party such reasonable amounts
for fees , costs , expensest including attorney' s fees , as
may be set by the Court .
The ENGINEER shall not sublet or assign any 0 f the
7 .2 services covered by this AGREEMENT, except with the
prior written approval of the OWNER and in strict
compliance with the terms , provisions , and conditions of
the AGREEMENT .
-4-
7 .3 The key ENGINEER' S personnel proposed for this project
are as follows:
Russ Erbes , P .E . - Principal in Charge tor/Manager
Douglas M. Isbell, P .E . - Project Direc
michael R. Perry - Deputy project Manager
ENGINEER agrees that these key people will be made
3ned to the OWNER' S project , and that
available and assi(. oncurrence from the
they will not be replaced without c
OWNER. nd agreed by and between the parties
7 .4 It is understood a
that all documents , records, drawings, designs and spe-
cifications , cost estimates , and other project documents
y the ENGINEER pursuant to this AGREEMENT
developed b property of OWNER and shall be
shall become the upon completion of services . Any
delivered to OWNER r other projects and any use
reuse of such documents fO sole
of incomplete documents will be at the OWNER' s
risk . 1 purposes an independent contractor .
7 .5 ENGINEER is for al ovided by ENGINEER pursuant to
All qualified personnel Pr REEMENT are to be employed by
the provisions of this AG
ENGINEER for his account only, and in no event shall
ENGINEER or any personnel retained by him be deemed to
have been employed by the OWNER or engaged by the OWNER
for the account of Or on behalf of the OWNER.
7 .6 Unless earlier terminated as stipulated below, this
agreement shall terminate upon completion and acceptance
by the OWNER of all services approved for performance
under Article 2 of this AGREEMENT .
ay be terminated in writing by either
7 .7 This AGREEMENT m; t of failure by the other party to
party in the even der this AGREEMENT through no
fulfill its obligations un ROVIDING, that no such
fault of the terminating party: P party is
termination may be effected unless the other
s than thirty (30) calendar days
given (1) not les d by certified mail , return
written notice (delivere erminate , and (2) an
receipt requested) of intent to t
opportunity for consultation with the terminating party
prior to termination. nated by the OWNER for reasons
7 .8 if this AGREEMENT is termi R, an adjustment to ENGINEER' S
of default by the ENGINEE (1) no amount shall be
compensation shall be made , but
allowed for anticipated profit or unperformed services ,
-5-
and (2) any payment due to the ENGINEER at the time of
termination may be adjusted to the extent of any addi-
tional costs to the OWNER occasioned by the ENGINEER' S
r default is effected by the
default . if termination fo ide
ENGINEER, the adjustment in compensation shall prov
to the ENGINEER to include a reasonable
for payment for
profit for services rendered and reimbursement
expenses . incurred prior to the termination, in addition
to termination settlement costs reasonably incurred by
the ENGINEER relating to commitments which had become
firm and approved by OWNER prior to the termination .
of a termination notice, the ENGINEER shall
7 .9 Upon recelDt services affected (unless
(1) promp�ly discontinue all
the notice directs otherwise) , and (2) deliver or other
wise make available to the OWNER, copies of data, design
calculations , drawings, specifications , reports , esti-
summaries , and such other information and mater-
mates , ccumulated by the ENGINEER in
ials as may have been a
performing services under this AGREEMENT .
7 .10 ENGINEER shall maintain books and accounts of all
project related payroll costs and all expenses and
incidental expense . Books shall be available at all
reasonable times for examination by the OWNER at the
office of the ENGINEER.
7 .11 This AGREEMENT, including attachments incorporated
herein by reference, represents the entire AGREEMENT and
understanding between the parties and any negotiations,
proposals or oral agreements are intended to be
integrated herein and to be superseded by this written
AGREEMENT . Any supplement or amendment to this AGREE-
MENT to be effective shall be in writing and signed by
the OWNER and ENGINEER.
7 .12 This AGREEMENT is to be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California .
OF , duly authorized representatives of
IN WITNESS WHERE signed in confirmation of this
the parties have
AGREEMENT .
KLEINFELDER, INC
CITY OF REDLANDS
B y C��' Zg 4//
—i567U i�SBELL
By__ GLAS M
SEONIJ�G ( AM) KIM Engineering Manager
s
s Director
Utilit
-6-
ATrACHMENT A
PROPOSAL TO PERFOR-M, LANDS
RDSI REVISION FOR THE CITY OF RED
STREF
CALIFORNIA T L.A�DFILL
PROPOSAL TO PERFORM
RDSI REvISION FOR THE CITY OF REDLANDS
CALIFORNIA STREET LANDFILL
CONTENTS
.................................... 1-i
INTRODUCTION.................................................. ............... 1-i
1.1 Project Description .........................................................
1.2 project Understanding.....................
2-1
TECHNICAL APPROACH.............. 2-1
2 2.1 Task I -Data Collection and Site Visit............................. 2-1
2.2 Task 2 -Data Analysis and Engineering Design.......................
2.3 Task 3 -Preliminary Closure and 2-2
post Closure N4aintenance Plan................................... .. . ... .... 2-2
2.4 Task 4 - Preparation of Draft RDS1..................................**"'***** 2-3
2.5 Task 5 - Final RDSI.......................................................................
3 PROJECT TEAM ORGANIZATION............... 3-1
4 SCHEDULE..............................*******************'************'***********'***.................... 4-1
5 COSTS.......................................................................................................... 5-1
FIGURES
EAge
project Team Organization............................. 3-1
3-1
(6)70YP0378
INTRODUC-nON
Project Description of Redlands is a Class III sanitary landfill
The California Street landfill operated by City edlands (City). The landfill is
cated at the northern end of California Street in City of R
lo er Solid Waste Facility Permit No. 36-55-OV issued by the County of San
operated und of Health Services as the local enforcement agency (LEA) for the
Bernardino Department d (CrWIAB). Because of significant changes in
alifornia Integrated Waste Management Board ,
C the LEA has determined that the current permit for the landfill is no
the landfill operation the LEA has requested the City to prepare and submit a new
longer valid; and consequently, n (RDSI) in accordance with Title 14 of California Code of
Report of Disposal Site Informatio
Regulations. ed this proposal at the request of the City to provide engineering
Kleinfelder has prepar Street Landfill for submission to the LEA and
services to Prepare an RDS1 for the California
the CIWMB-
1.2 Project Understanding e regulatory Process of updating a solid waste
This section presents our understanding of th Landfill. The process of updating a
facility permit and the permit status of California Street e years through the preparation and
solid waste facility permit is normally initiated every fiv
ew (PSR) by a registered civil engineer for submission to
certification of a Periodic Site Revi , the purpose of the PSR is to
B through the LEA- According to the CIWMB
the CIWN4 ill have been evaluated with respect to the environment
ensure that all conditions at a landf r is to make recommendations to enhance site
and public health and safety. The enginee
conditions based on conclusions developed during the review.
combined RDSI and five (5) Year
Kleinfelder understands that IT corporation prepared a The combined document has been
Engineering Review of the facility in November 1988.
B and has been found to be deficient. Results of a meeting
reviewed by the LEA and CIWM r, and the LEA on September 2-5, 1990, resulted in a
between the City of Redlands, Kleinfelde RDS1 prepared in November 1988. It
recommendation from the LEA that the City revise the
1-i
(6)70yK378
ed upon the facilities existing conditions and
was further recommended that the RDS1 be focus
t discussion regarding potential landfill expansion.
avoid significan-
The City, as site operator, would normally initiate the permit review process by filing an
Application for a Solid Waste Facility Permit along with the PSR to the LEA 120 days before
the permit review is due. Through the course of their review, the LEA would determine that
odification, or no change to the existing permit is necessary. For the California
a revision, a m has deter-mined that the site has undergone significant
street Landfill, however, the LEA longer valid. Therefore, the LEA has requested that a
changes and the landfill permit is no the existing permit until the landfill reaches
new RDSI be submitted immediately to update uld have to be permitted after a
ultimate capacity. Any horizontal or vertical expansion wo
r the existing, landfill is obtained.
valid permit fo
Kleinfelder plans to collect, analyze, and assimilate all existing data from the sources
described below into the format prescribed by the clWMB for the RDSI. Any data gaps
would be resolved with the City prior to proceeding with the preparation of the RDSI. No
additional field investigations are anticipated with the exception of visual site inspections.
Potential data sources will include:
The existing Five-Year PSR and RDSI prepared by IT Corporation.
Water Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT) report including groundwater
monitoring records.
Air SWAT report including monitoring records.
City's landfill design plans.
Site topographic maps
Legal boundary descriptions
City operational records
-2
(6)70YPO378
Regulatory site inspection reports
Local Enforcement Agency
South Coast Air Quality Management District
CIWMB
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Previous studies or reports
Kleinfelder will evaluate the data and conclusions presented in the above sources for inclusion
into the RDSI. Any data deficiencies or inappropriate conclusions that are discovered in the
above sources will be brought to the City's attention and resolved prior to proceeding with the
preparation of the RDSI. Kleinfelder proposes to perform limited analysis and engineenng
design, as appropriate, to complete the RDSI. The primary objective of the Scope of Work
presented herein will be to provide the City with a RDSI which is complete and in a format
acceptable to LEA and CIWMB.
It is our understanding the landfill's waste discharge permit issued by the Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB) is still valid. Whether this permit also needs to be revised
or not is unknown to us at this time. Our scope of work, however, is limited to preparation of
RDSI, and the Scope of work to a Report of Waste Discharge for submission to RWO-CB is
not included in this proposal.
1-3
(6)70YPO378
2 TECHNICAL APPROACH
The scope of work to prepare a RDSI for the California Street Landfill will consist of the
following five (5) tasks:
Task 1: Data Collection and Site Visit
Task 2: Data Analysis and Engineering Design
Task 3: Preliminary closure and post-closure Maintenance Plan
Task 4: Preparation of Draft RDSI
Task 5: Final RDSI
The proposed technical approach for these tasks is described below.
2.1 Task 1 - Data Collection and Site Visit
After the City authorizes to proceed with the project, key project team members will meet
with the City to collect additional data and reports not currently with Kleinfelder. At this
meeting, the project schedule and scope of work will be discussed in detail. This meeting will
also provide an opportunity to identify key contacts with the City and Kleinfelder for
communication during the progress of this project.
After this meeting, Kleinfelder's project team members, will visit the site to visually observe
the landfill operation and the site setting.
2.2 Task 2 - Data Analysis and Engineering Design
This task will consist of analyzing the landfill operational data and latest topographic map
provided by the City to generate additional new information to be incorporated in the RDSI.
Since the operation information contained in the PSR and RDS1 prepared by IT dates back to
1988, we will update the operation information to reflect the present conditions. it is our
2-1
(6)70YPO378
understanding that the landfill has been supposedly scheduled to be closed in 1994.
Therefore, based on the currently daily refuse volumes disposed and the projected volumes
through 1994, we will develop projected fill plans, depicting landfill configuration in 1994.
The permit revision will be for this projected fill plan within the current landfill limits. These
fill plans will be presented in the RDSL
The City should note that this task will be an important part of the project as it establishes the
ultimate landfill configuration projected for 1994. Refuse disposal beyond these limits will
require a revision to the permit.
2.3 Task 3 - Preliminary Closure and post-Closure Maintenance Plan
The CJWMB regulations require that a preliminary Closure and Postclosure Plan be
submitted for all solid waste landfills when applying for a revised solid waste facility permit.
Ile project team will develop preliminary Closure and Postclosure Maintenance Plans for the
current landfill limits. The preliminary closure and post-closure plan information presented
in the existing documents will be used, where possible, and closure cost estimates will be
provided in 1990 dollars. This closure plan will address the projected ultimate fill plan for
1994 as developed under Task 2.2. The closure plan document will be part of the RDSI as an
appendix. For permitting purposes, this closure plan will be more narrative in nature and we
do not anticipate developing any engineering plans under this task.
2.4 Task 4 - Preparation of Draft RDSI
The CIWMB Permit Review Desk Manual dated April 1989 states that a RDSI is a working
document that describes actual site operations and the administrative procedures to ensure
that all possible or potential health, safety, and environmental hazards have been eliminated
or mitigated, and that all possible nuisances will be prevented. The RDSI should be self-
contained document and should not reference other documents. Therefore, all previously
completed studies such as Air and Water Solid Waste Assessment Tests (SWATs) and
envirom-nental monitoring records will be surnmarized in the RDSI and published as
appendices. This document is a required attachment to the Application for a Solid Waste
Facilities Permit.
2-2
(6)70YPO378
Prior to preparation of the RDSI document, we will present an RDSI outline to the City for
review. The draft RDSI will be prepared to consist of all the information as outlined in the
permit review manual.
The draft RDSI will be prepared mainly by utilizing the data and information presented in the
existing documents. Data and ultimate fill plan developed under Task 2 will be incorporated
in the RDSI to present the most current information regarding landfill operation and
development. Any relevant information already gathered during our CEQA initial studies will
also be incorporated. The closure plan prepared under Task 2 will be summarized in the
RDSI, and closure plan document will be included in an appendix. The RDSI will also consist
of landfill gas system design, currently being performed by Kleinfelder, in an appendix. We
will require City's written authorization to utilize the information in the existing documents as
is available, whenever possible. This approach will minimize the effort required to prepare
the RDSL The draft RDSI will be provided to City for review and comment.
2.5 Task 5 - Final RDSI
All comments from the City will be incorporated to finalize the RDSI document. We will
provide 5 copies of the final RDSI to the City one (1) week after the receipt of comments.
2-3
(6)70YPO378
3 PROJECT TEAM ORGANIZATION
(6)70YPO378 3-1
City of Redlands
California Street Landfill
Report of Disposal Site Information
City of Redlands
Municipal Utilities Dept.
California Street
Landfill
QA/QC R%Liew
I I
Russ Erbes
Project Manager
Douglas Isbell, P.E.
I
public Hearings
Michael R. Perry
Data Analysis Closure/post-Closure Plan RDSI Preparation
Katrina Lyons Katrina Lyons Greg A. Thompson
Greg A. Thompson Greg A. Thompson Douglas Brewer
Engineering Design
Steve Duran
4 SCHEDULE
Our proposal schedule for this project is four (4) weeks after the City's authorization to
proceed. The schedule includes two (2) meetings with the City: one kick-off meeting and one
before submitting the draft RDSI to the City.
(6)70YPO378 4-1
ATTACHMENT B PROJECT BUDGET
City of Redlands
California Street Landfill
RDSI Revision
Task I Data Review and Site Visit
Estimated Rate Extended
Staff Hours ($/hr) Cost($)
Project Manager
Daya P. Bettadapura 6 100 600
Project Professional
Michael R. Perry 3 83 249
Assistant Professional
Greg Thompson 6 72 432
Task Total $1,281
Task 2 Data Analysis and Engineering Design
Estimated Rate Extended
Staff Hours ($/hr) Cost($)
Pzincipal Professional
Douglas M. Isbell 2 125 250
Project Manager
Daya P. Bettadapura 8 83 664
Staff Professional
Katrina M. Lyons 16 83 1328
Assistant Professional
Greg Thompson 32 72 2304
Staff Professional
Steve Duran 16 95 1520
Task Total $6,066
Task 3 Preliminary Closure/Post Closure Maintenance Plan
Estimated Rate Extended
Staff Hours ($/hr) Cost
Principal Professional
Douglas M. Isbell 2 125 2SO
Project Manager
Daya P. Bettadapura 6 100 600
Staffprolessionfil
Katrina M. Lyons 24 83 1992
Assist,?nt Professional
Greg Thompson 40 72 2880
Task Total $5,722
Task 4 Draft RDS1
Estimated Rate Extended
Staff Hours ($/hr) Cost($)
Principal Professional
Douglas M. Isbell 8 125 1000
Project Professional
Michael R. Perry 4 83 332
Project Manager
Daya P. Bettadapura, 10 100 1000
Assistant P�ofessional
Greg Thompson 30 72 2160
Staff Professional
Doug Brewer 30 83 2490
Technical Typist
Gwen Sapp 30 50 1500
Task Total S8,482
Task 5 Final RDS1
Estimated Rate Extended
Staff Hours ($/hr) Cost($)
Pzincipal Professional
Douglas M. Isbell 2 125 250
Project Professional
Michael R. Perry 3 95 285
Project Manager
Daya P. Bettadapura 12 100 1200
Assistant Professional
Greg Thompson 16 83 1328
Technical Typist
Gwen Sapp 8 so 400
Task Total $3,463
Grand ToW $25,014
ATrACHMENT C SCHEDULE OF FEES
KLEINFELDER
1990 FEE SCHEDULE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Kleinf elder is a consulting firm that provides services in hydrogeology,environmental engineering,geochemistry,industrial health and
safety,geotechnical engineering,engineering geology,mining engineering,water resources,solid waste engineering and planning,
air quality,agricultural engineering,and materials engineering and testing. Since 1961,the firm has provided consulting services to
industries, governmental agencies,commercial firms,developers,financial institutions, and other design professionals.
OFFICES AND TESTING LABORATORIES
ARIZONA 4369 Caterpillar Road NEVADA
4920 E. McDowell,Suite 101 Redding,CA 96003 6850 Paradise Road
Phoenix,AZ 85008 (916)244-7203 Las Vegas,NV 89119
(602)231-0992 11731 Sterling Avenui,Suite E (702)736-2936
Riverside,CA 92503 3189 Mill Street
CAUFORNIA (714)688-2513 Reno,NV 89502
17100 Pioneer Blvd,Suite 350 586S Labath Avenue, Suite S (702)323-7182
Artesia,CA 90701 Rohnert Park,CA 94928
(213)860-SSS9 (707)S8S-8608 UTAH
125 A Grobric Court 601 Commerce Drive, Suite 130 2605 East 3300 South
Cordelia.CA 94585 Roseville,CA 95678 Salt Lake City.LIT 84109
(707)864-1393 (916)784-366 (801)466-6769
1975 E Street 9795 Business Park Drive 212 North 1000 East
Fresno,CA 93706 Sacramento,CA 95827 St George,LIT 84770
(209)486-0750 (916)366-1701 (801)628-5231
526 Hofgaarden Street 9771 Clairemont Mesa Blvd, Suite G WASHINGTON
City of Industry,CA 91744 San Diego, CA 92124
(818)369-2224 (619)541-1145 1200 112th Avenue NE, Suite C-226
Bellevue,WA 98004
15375 Barranca Parkway,Suite J-101 (206)451-2877
Irvine,CA 92718 2825 East Myrtle Street
(714)727-4466 Stockton,CA 95205
(209)948-1345
123 Commerce Drive 524 Waddell Drive,Suite 3
Mammoth Lakes,CA 93546 Sunnyvale,CA 94089
(619)934-6829 (408)734-4950
(Seasonal)
1575 West Main Street 2121 N.California Blvd,Suite 570
Merced,CA 95340 Walnut Creek.CA 94S96
(209)384-75S2 (415)938-5610
6880 Koll Center Parkway,Suite 200
Pleasanton,CA 94566
(415)484-1700
XLEINFELDER
WMLAW
1990 SCHEDULE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL STAFF RATES*
Research Assistant .. .. . . ... . .... .. . . ...... .. .. . . .. . .... . ... ............ $ 60/bour
TechnicalWtitillf........ .. .................... .......... ... .. ..... ....... $ 70/hour
AssistantProtessionai. ....... ....... ... .............. .. ... ............... s 72/bour
Staff Professional - .......... .... . .. ................. $ 83ibour
Prolect j;;j"7-�;;,�j ..... ........................ $ 9"our
Project Manner.................. . .................. ................... $10"our
Senior Professional................................................ $1101hour
Senior Projed Manager................................ ................... $1 1S/hour
Principal Prof4sslonal............................... .. I........ . ........ $12"our
SeniorPrincipal.................................... . .. ...........****"' $150/hour
SpecialConsultant(s)........................... ....... .................. . On Request
ADMINISTRATIVE/TECHNICAL STAFF RATES
CleeAfTYPW..................................... ....................... $ 42/hour
TechnicalTYPIst........................................ .. ............... $ 50ibour
Pmfect Administrative Assistant............................................ $ 55)hour
Drafter................................................ . ......**-*" $ 55/hour
Designer.............................................................. $ 62tbour
SenlorDesigner................................... ... ................... $ 72/hour
Field Technician.............................. .......................... $ softur
Environmental Technician...:***, *************, *,**,* **, ***** ***,* *****... $ 60ftur
Senior Environmental Technician........................... . ............... $ 6SYbour
Applies to all professional rates including but not limited to civil,mechanical,dwmicaL electrical,
geotechnical and environmental engineers, industrial hygienists-, geologists; hydrogeologists;
hydm1og1sft-.and computer specialists.
k" KLEINFELDER
AIR AND GAS Rate/Day Rate/Week Rate/Month
Absolute Pressure Transducer... .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . .. .. . $ 20 $ 65 $ 200
Bacharach 0,Combustible Analyzer. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . 30 100 330
Barhole Punch..... ..... .. .. . . . . . .. . . . . ... . . . . .. . . . . 15
Barometer ............. ..... .. .. . . . .. . .. ... .. .. . .. . 10 35 110
Calibration Gas........... ... .. . .. . . . .. ... .. ... .. .. . . 5
Calibration Gas Regulator....... ... .. ............ ... ... 5 20 60
Combustible Gas Analyzer..... .. .. . . . .. . ..... ..... .... 50 175 550
Differential Pressure Transducer.. . ... . . .. . .... ...... ... 20 75 220
Draeger Quantimeter............ . . .. . .. . .. . . .. ...... . 100 350 1,100
DraegerTubes................. . . .. .. ... ... .... . .. .. 10 each
Dual Ambient Air Sampler........... ... ........... ... .. 55 170 600
Field Gas Chromatograph.......... .. ... ............... Soo 2,000 5,500
Fyrfte 002 Indicator............ ... .. ... ....... ..... ... 10 30 100
WF rite 0 2 Indicator................ .. . . ... .. ........... 10 30 100
as Chromatograph(office)......... .. ............... .. 60 each run
GasProduction Curves.... ........... .. ..... .. ........ 350 each run
Gastech GX�21N.............. ....... .. ............... so 175 550
Gastech NP-204 and IP-204..... ..... .. ................ 50 175 550
Gastechtors................. .... .. ... ............. .. 50 175 550
Integrated Surface Sampler..... ... . . . ... .. .. .......... 30 100 330
Irrometer. . .............. ..... . ..... ...... .......... S 20 55
Kurz Velocity Motor. ....... .... .. ..... .. .... ..... .... . 20 75 220
Magnehelic Gauge. .............. . . .... .. ..... .... ... 10 35 110
Mobile Emissions Laboratory..... . .. . .. . ....... ........ 1,000 3,000
Moisture Meter................... .. . . . ......... ..... 10 35 110
Nalgene,Hand Pump.............. .. . .. .......... ..... is so 165
02 Analyzer....... ..... ...... . .. .. .. .. . .... ...... . .. 55 200 600
Organic Vapor Analyzer.. ...... .. .. . . .. . ........ . ..... �160 475 1,700
Organic Vapor Analyzer with Strip Chart Recorder...... . ... 180 500 1,900
Orifice Plate*........... ...... .. . . .. .. ............ .. . 20 60 220
Pitot Tubes.... ................ . .. . . .. . ............. 10 35 110
Portable Brailsford Pump or Equivalent. . .. .. ....... ... ... 25 90 275
SlackTube Manometer......... .. .. .. .. ..... ....... ... 5 20 60
SoundLevel Motor............ . .. . . . . .. .. ............ 40
Strip Chart Recorder(dual pen).. . . .. . .. . .... ... ..... ... 15 ISO 165
Strip Chart Recorder(single pen).... .. .. ............ .... is so 165
TestSkid. .................... .. . .. .. . .............. 270 950 3,000
Test Trailer......... ... ........ . .. . ....... ...... .... 325 1,200 3,600
Vibration Analyzer.. ........... .... . .. ........ ........ 55
Voltmeter.. ........ .... .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .... ...... ..... 5 20 55
Wind Speed and Direction Indicator(one system each)....... 325 1,200
E90
KLEINFELDER
OTHER EQUIPMENT CHARGES
GEOPHYSICAL EXPLORATION EQUIPMENT
Seismograph,Single Channel Bison Model 1570C or Nimbus
Model ES-1 25. . . . . . . . . . . $160/day
Seismograph,Twelve Channel Nimbus Model ES121OF.... .... .... .. ........ $420/day
Resistivity Meter, Bison Model #2390. .. . . . .. . . . . . ... .. .. . .. .. . .. .. ..... . . $140/day
Soil Test Model R-400. . . . . .. .. . . . . . . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. . . . .... . ..... $11 0/day
Megger Earth Tester.. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . ... .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . ... . . $ 90/day
Magnetometer,Portable Proton-Geometrics Model 6816. . .. .... . .. ... ........ $160/day
Electromagnetics.. . .. .. . .. . . ... ..... .. . .. .. . .... . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. ...... $1 90/day
Ground Penetrating Radar. . . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . .. .. .. .. . . . . . .. . . . .. ....... On Request
VEHICLES
Vehicle,2 Wheel Drive . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. .. ... . .. . . . . ... .... . ....... $ 7/hour
Vehicle,4 Wheel Drive ... .. . . .. .. . . . ... . . . . .. .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. . . . ....... $ 1 0/hour
Mileage,2 Wheel Drive. . .... ... . .. . .. . .. . .. . ..... .. ... ... . ..... . ...... $ 0.45/mile
Mileage,4 Wheel Drive . . ..... ... ..... . .. ... ........ ... . .. . .. . .. . ...... $ 0.50/mile
Utility Trailer..... ... ..... . .. . ... . .... . . . ... .. ... . . ... .. . .... .. ...... $ 30/day
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
Personal Computer,basic software systems. . ............... . ...... . ...... $ 12/bour
Microcomputer,basic software systems and supporting hardwaret .. .. .......... $ 15/hour
Mainframe Computer Time-Sharing (per CPU minuter.. .. .... . .. ............ $ 6/minute
Computer Connect Timet...... ..... ..... . . ......... .... .. . ..... ....... $ 5/hour
Disk Storage(per megabyte)t . ....... . .... ... ........ .... . .... .......... $ 55/month
Interactive Surface Modeling (ISM)Software Surcharget. .. .... . ..... . . ...... $ 25/hour
Environmental Information Management System Software Surcharget........... $ 1 0/hour
Project Management and CPM Software Surcharge..... . . .... . . . ... .. ...... $ 10/hour
Reproduction.. .... . .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . .... . ... ...... .. . ... ..... .. . ..... . $ 0.24/page
Telephone.... ... . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. .. ... . .... .. .. .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . ....... $ 0.40/minute
Facsimile Copies.. . . . . . . .. . ... .. . .. . . ... . ... ...... ... .. .. . ... ........ $ 1.30/page
Report Surcharge. . .. . .. .. . . . .... . . . .. . . . . .. ... . ..... . . . .. . . . . ....... $ 30/copy
t Discounts available for project-specific support services.
E90