HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_11-19711
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
08-SBd-106 - 0.0/2.9
08-SBd-10 - 28.9/30.9
FREEWAY AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into, in duplicate, this
®rH day of Apgli- , 1.9_ 1 , by and between the
STATE OF CALIFORNIA� acting by and through the Department of
Public Works, Division of Highways, hereinafter for convenience
referred to as "the State", and the CITY OF REDLANDS, herein-
after for convenience referred to as "the City",
WITNESSETH•
WHEREAS, the California Highway Commission adopted
resolutions declaring certain portions of State Highway Route 10
and State Highway Route 106 to be a freeway as follows:
1. July 24, 1957, on Route 10 between Hunts Lane and east
city limits of Redlands;
2. May 22, 1963, on Route 106 between Route 30 and Route 101
and
WHEREAS, State and City have heretofore entered into a
Freeway Agreement dated August 6, 1957, a Supplemental Freeway
Agreement dated September 1, 1959, a Second Supplemental
Freeway Agreement dated May 17, 1960, and a Third Supplemental
Freeway Agreement dated May 2, 1961, relating to that certain
portion of State Highway Route 10 between the west city limit
(Kansas Street extended) and the east city limit (Wabash Street);
and
WHEREAS, the City has annexed County territory to the west
and the westerly city limit is now located approximately 0.1
mile east of Nevada Street; and
WHEREAS, a plan map has been prepared showing the proposed
freeway plan of the State for Route 106 between Route 10 and the
north city limit of Redlands (Santa Ana River) and a new plan for
alterations to State Route 10 between the west city limit (0.1
mile east of Nevada Street) and Orange Street; and
z
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1❑
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
WHEREAS, the prepared plan shows the proposed plan of the
State as it affects streets of the City, including provisions
for closing city streets, for carrying city streets over or
under or to a connection with such freeway, for relocation of
city streets and for construction of frontage roads and other
local roads;
NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed:
1. The City agrees and consents to the closing of city
streets, relocation of city streets, construction of frontage
roads and other local roads, and other construction affecting
city streets, all as shown on the plan map attached hereto
marked Exhibit "A" on Route 106 between Route 10 and north city
limit (Santa Ana River) and on Route 10 between the west city
limit (0.1 mile east of Nevada Street) and Orange Street.
2. That the plan map attached hereto marked Exhibit "A"
shall supersede that portion of the plan neap marked Exhibit "A"
attached to the Third Supplemental Freeway Agreement dated
May 2, 1961, relating to that certain portion of State Highway
Route 10 between the west city limit (Kansas Street extended)
and orange Street, and become a part of this freeway agreement.
3. That except for the superseded portion the said Freeway
Agreement dated August b, 1957, and supplements thereto, shall
remain in full force and effect, unmodified by any provision of
this agreement.
4. The State in the construction of said freeway will,
at the State's expense, make such changes affecting city streets
in accordance with the plan attached hereto or as the same may
hereafter be modified by subsequent agreement between the
parties hereto. The State may, at the State's expense, install
signs, signals and other traffic control devices at appropriate
locations to be determined by the State in order to regulate,
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
warn or guide traffic upon the highways.
S. The State agrees to acquire all real property and
interests in real property required for construction affecting
city streets and the City authorizes the State to acquire in
its behalf all such real property or interests in real property.
6. The City will accept control and maintenance over each
of the relocated or reconstructed city streets and the frontage
roads and other State constructed local roads on notice to the
City from the State that the work thereon has been completed,
except as to any portion thereof which is adopted by the State
as a part of the freeway proper. The City will also accept
title to the portions of such roads lying outside the freeway
limits, upon relinquishment by the State.
7. The grade separations shown on said plan map attached
hereto marked Exhibit "A" will be either undercrossings or
overcrossings as detailed engineering studies may determine
will best fit the locality.
8. It is understood that the freeway may be constructed
in stages.
9. This agreement may be modified at: any time by the
mutual consent of the parties hereto, as may become necessary
forthe best accomplishment through State and City cooperation
of the whole freeway project for the benefit of the people of
the State and of the City.
-3-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereunto have set their
hands and seals the day above first written.
State of California
Department of Public Works
JANES A. MOE
APPROVED: Director of Public Works
L
State , �igh7a—yEngiv-n—eer
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Attorney
L. 5
CITY OF �_2j�jd „�.r
A municipal corporatio
M AY 2 0 1971
I K MALONEY
IDOPUtY Director
Planning Commission Recommendations as considered by the City Council at
a regular meeting thereof held on April 20, 1971 at 2:00 P.M.
Present: Councilmen DeMirjyn, Knudsen, Miller, Sewall, Mayor Cummings;
Deputy City Attorney Bill Brunickg Press: Chuck Palmer and
Grant Sims
1. Tennessee Street Freeway - Agreement and Maps
This being the time and place advertised for hearing on the
maps, routing and agreement for the Tennessee Street Freeway►
Mayor Cummings announced the meeting open as a public hearing.
Mayor Cummings introduced Mr. R. E. Deffebach, Mr. H. C.
Prentice, Mr. Fred Jackson, San Bernardino County Supervisor
Don Beckord, Mr. Dennis Hansberger, and Mr. Martin Nicholas,
County Highway Engineer, and stated that these gentlemen
were present to answer any questions or offer recommendations.
Speaking in favor of the adoption of the freeway at this time
was Mr. Fred Ford, representing the Chamber of Commerce. Mr.
Ford stressed the time factor as being of the essence and
strongly urged approval. Also speaking in favor were -.Mr.
Raymond A. Beeler, who presented a petition with 146 signatures
requesting approval of the freeway at this time, Mr. Louis
Fletcher and Mr. Hal Hagen, president of the Foothill Freeway
Association. Speaking against the proposal in its present
form was Mr. John Runkel, who requested better access for the
properties on Alabama Street. Mr. R. E. Deffebach gave cost
estimates, time projections, and answered questions presented
by Mr. Knudsen and Mr. Sewall. He urged acceptance of the
plan as here presented and recommended that negotiations for
changes in offramps be included in the cover letter. Mr.
Deffebach gave the opinion that the State would provide right-
of-way for frontage roads both east and west. Councilman
Sewall expressed concern for the impact on the ecology of the
area by so large an interchange. Following further discussion,
on motion of Councilman DeMirjyn, seconded by Councilman
Miller, the City Council accepted the agreement and authorized
the signing of the Freeway Agreement by the Mayor, with the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmen DeMirjyn, Knudsen, Miller, Mayor Cummings
NOES: Councilman Sewall
ABSENT: None
Council recessed for five minutes. At 3:30 P.M. the Council
reconvened to consider the remaining matters referred to them
by the Planning Commission.
Council Action - Planning
Page one --
April 20, 1971
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS (Continued)
2. Street Vacation No. 58 - Mobil Oil Corporation
Application for vacation of the westerly half of a 15--foot
alley located 110 feet east of Orange Street between High
Avenue and Interstate 10 Freeway as requested by the Mobil
Oil Corporation was recommended for denial by the City
Council. Mr. Bob Wagner addressed Council with the request
that as his client has met with the Dill family, who
originated the objection to the street closure, and had
come to an agreement, the matter be returned to the Planning
Commission. On motion of Councilman DeMirjyn, seconded by
Councilman Knudsen, the matter was referred back to the
Planning Commission for hearing on the second Tuesday in May.
3. Lot S lit No. 419 - Curbing and Sidewalk Installation -
Halsey Street
A request by property owners that they be permitted to sign
the improvement agreement for curbs and sidewalks on the
property located on Halsey Street - Lot Split No. 419 -- was
again brought to Council. Mrs. J. W. Simonds, Mr. George
Fikrle, Dr. Gilbert Becker and Mrs. R. C. Oliver addressed
Council. They spoke of the beauty of the street and requested
that it be left as it is, for it presently discourages traffic,
is used a great deal by neighborhood children, and is not used
in any way for through traffic. Following very lengthy dis-
cussion, Council approval was given for the signing of the
agreement by the three property owners involved in the present
lot split, Caruthers, Fikrle, and Simonds.
Following this matter, Council briefly discussed the practi-
cality of amending the ordinance to outline specifications for
substandard streets in areas in which standard streets are
impractical.
1, Alice G. Walls, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Redlands, California,
do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct excerpt from
the minutes of the City Council Meeting dated April 20, 1971.
C
Deputy City Clerk, City of Redlands
Council Action - Planning
Page two -
April 20, 1971
XC: Councilmembers, City Manager, Ron Mutter, Pete Laaninen
STATE OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS, TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN, Govemar
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
1120 N STREET +�►
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
TDD (916) 323-7665
(916) 322-2000
May 25, 1988
City Council
City of Redlands
Redlands, CA 92373
R/W ENGINEERING
8-SBd-30-32.2/32.5
Rel. Req. No. 366S
Collateral Facilities
IR-010-2(164)77
CTC Res: R-2980
CTC Date: 5-20-88
Subject: RELINQUISHMENT OF HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY
Attached for your information is a certified copy of the above -
referenced California Transportation Commission Resolution of
Relinquishment. This action was taken in accordance with Section
73 of the Streets and Highways Code.
Your attention is directed to Section 100.9 of the Streets and
Highways Code regarding relocated State highways which bypass
cities or business districts. The directional signs erected by
the State on such highways shall be left in place and maintained
by the local agency.
The relinquishment will become effective upon recordation and your
office will be notified immediately thereafter.
ly.1e,
ep L. A teberry, C of Engineering & Uti it
Branch
Division of Right of Way
Attachment
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSM
RESOLUTION NO
R2880
t UED BY
%0C4xWt4%0
Zo
TItANSPORTATtON coumf i "
RELINQUISHMENT OF HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY IN THE
CITY OF REDLANDS, ROAD 8-SBD-30-32.2/32.5
REQUEST NO. 366S
WHEREAS, by freeway agreement dated April 20, 1971,
between the City of Redlands and the State of California, the City
agreed to accept title to reconstructed city streets upon
relinquishment thereof to said City by the State of California;
and
WHEREAS, the State of California has acquired right of
way for and has constructed the above -mentioned collateral
facilities in the City of Redlands, at Pioneer Avenue Undercrossing
and along new Tennessee Street between Pioneer Avenue and
San Bernardino Avenue, road 8-SBd-30, in accordance with said
agreement; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 73 of the Streets
and Highways Code, a 90-day notice in writing dated December 30,
1987, of intention to relinquish the above -mentioned collateral
19
facilities was delivered to the City by certified mail return
receipt on January 5, 1988, Article Number 95680; and
WHEREAS, this Commission has found and determined, and
does hereby find and determine, that it is desirable and in the
public interest that said collateral facilities be relinquished to
the City of Redlands for use as city streets;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS VOTED by the California Transpor-
tation Commission that it relinquish, and it does hereby relin-
quish, to the City of Redlands, effective upon the recordation of a
certified copy hereof with the Recorder of San Bernardino County,
all of the State of California's right, title and interest in and
to said collateral facilities in said City, together with the right
of way and appurtenances thereof, described as follows:
That portion of highway right of way, road 8-SBd-30,
shown as Segments 1 through 3 to be relinquished as indicated on
one set of three maps filed for record on April 15, 1988 in State
Highway Map Book No. 13, pages 91, 92 and 93, in the office of the
San Bernardino County Recorder.
THIS IS TO CERTIFY that the foregoing is a full and correct copy of the
original resolution duly passed by the California Transportation Commission
at its meeting regularly called and held on the 20th day of May, 1988, in the
City of Los Angeles.
Dated this 24th day May, 1988. --
/' i
}
4NEN
Chief Deputy Director
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
_ E 15TIN@ ROUTE do
'�� peaKGE 51
05p7
$3/
1. IS. R. 3 W. S. B. M.
r SCALE IN FEET
rrW
ors! COr1++r! •OVrF rOSr rri! 5HlSr
a s�EF
8 SBd '0
tFISERICTOR
RquEsreA Card (nElnoer xa Nq3 3568,
OATEAPPROVE0 /r. —,. - &7 _
LIMIT OF WORK
1 STA 436.60 PM 302
iT�NN�S.SjE 51
All
_
_-- =
l.,j.t�• r.,Yi:• F � >E.;}., d•-tit.
8
Slate of Calltornla
Business and Transportation Agency
Department of Transportation
INpEX MAP OF
RELM111SHMENT
REQUEST NQ.366
PORTION TO BE RELINQUISHED
r roan ror ,PrPrF�r r au•ao.ea rrrvy SCALE: I - 2 6 00 r
1
- --- , 9ai s•Ilouse •a.+rnl n s
B SBd 30 3z • 5 2
- r ExIsrlRc +'��r ''`''*;'1 C.e�-+L•+ r�• �GG+fI_.�-w'
DGTWT
CURVE OA11
11n
R
E
1
t
♦
C
3I.0•
4W'
C0•
I7.21'F7•
25.26'54•
71.O T'41•
560 2T•
N 11'
T5T OD'
176 50-
15! 52•
313 N'
n
ls9o•
g9•St�43•
.Iz%rLL•
w.ie�
[
400'
33.19'05•
11590'
25%r
69
I10'
20.4IW
YID a*'
391
C
20.53.38•
92 w122
M.
R
T55000q' •
0.•1.52'
9
a•
2E361'
73=, .. Rlif11lrNChN[•{IRR.+119/5
^ 4ITt• 35 34 EC 4I.p P•on..r a.. vn �:T-1 / ••• J�"
+f�j el1E +IrrsoNEo
TI S.
is 22
>] 1i �/ I114_• T1 T] fL LL 16 Oeo Idp _ ---.--�
'Rm RIP
11]4 • 12 94 PUT 4-51ou Oam• `Y//��
1175. 75 13 For i Ron.., aw� !
I I TO. 39 16 EC 1 $—. U•a•n
117U• N 74 POT LL 16 0n Rwv__ �Tl
53'L+ IiTO. 6. T. POl 1 Iwo A+• 30� 1t]2• N 14 lC LL 18 O, Wo.R ,
�• Segment 1 1•,1, t1.
1 I Fa • OS Is EL Ll 149.1 Yu Ad
•7.y STMIE P ,
Ant T _
111! • 36 29 EC 4 SIR— Orern
9— 4 tp♦ A O� iit•
1116. 60 M POC os_._ 1Roe1 r1.e1
A
I IT6• Si 79 SC 4 51ora 01o1n
mz
AA E••.1 t2' Cane P1PrJ {7r1 IIT§ E p.F3 fLL LL 9 011, R " `• ` e R
I I13•.S RS POTI I�Rle 30• 1 1rT!•9T 2l fG 115E OFl Ron• if � -\ jj\
103 • .5 R5 PUT 4 Ian Pan .. Aw / J � �29' Lt 1173, 97 2e POT 4 In R 1. 30
P3Qn.LER_ AVENUE, UNU£RCROSSINC t,
. // BRtLg XO 54 93]L
r 1 i i3 •. M E2 CC I r.o P,.,-, a \\
(y� t� li]!•6625 EL li SB 0lr Ron � �
i•1.1 FIR
2/
SA4 C°r
AA - Sec. Ifi
1169• N 14 9C t 1.p P.—, A— RIP � •F ='4' ,^�
.10 T DETAIL MAP OF RELINQUISHMENT
REQUEST NO. 3 66 S
- - - - PO ITION TO RE RELIM DISHED
L L 1331 ACCESS RIGHTS RETAINED SY STATI
1 Ex1sr11G 11E 1 U Stetr Map Hopi 1.L3a_'la ACCESS RIGHTS 10 K RELHMHIISNEI
net• _._._19 _Raii4 _Pear _
SCALE: P1 • I001
oar <aua{+ •am1 rosr .ne sour
6 S8d 30 .F/ 3 3
t +S�
+ � p51N[ICT lI[Ni M •�i i E[
�>'-p L -aa 'iq [N[IFr.rrr Cwx FlgwaJ EIS rdo4
T. I S. R.3 W. S. B. M. 8
/s 2z
Sec. 16
1
_ 1;1 • 5] I� Pal { P. onr.a•
—5' It tIBS• 90 !a PCI { Imo '
P.d.e.• are
f
30 '65
c
el L.•as .. 4JIG I �XirpOYF NE r JF vvESdE 5J E
w< n I
+60
S��ment 3
•l.0 jF
1II] • !I M PL'1 L Iro 1.....++rr }
5 LC•)1 1S' L
PLi { Iro tenn....e S•
IILi • �E 51 ZT, { Iro „tn 91��o•U •.ro �..
�I S47=r 1l1 i.•f:r/F�tY:r
� � yx�.. §•• -',� �" ";:� sue[.,: "` �+
E 11 E JJ rlt SI alr r]�Xn HAr µAu xUll1
[lalr �_w l4 Bau. __Pare —
I,Ir rr r .�,I r mil crl.r, rrrut
+bo
O
30
a�
I
/6 2/
DETAIL MAP OF RELINQUISHMENT
REQUEST N0.366 S
PORTION TO BE RELINOUISHED
)J uu ACCESS RIGHTS RETAINED BY STATE
ssJsa . ACCESS RIGHTS TO /E RELINWISHEO
SCALE: V • 100 F