Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_175-2019EA 7 2 (1 29 19) AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF PROFESSIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR A PRIVATE PROJECT This agreement foi the provision of professional environmental consulting services ("Agreement") is made and entered into this 19th day of August, 2019 ("Effective Date"), by and between the City of Redlands, a municipal corporation ("City") and EPD Solutions Incorporated ("Consultant"), who are sometimes individually referred to herein as a "Party" and, together, as the "Parties " In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Consultant agree as follows ARTICLE 1 — ENGAGEMENT OF CONSULTANT 1 1 City hereby engages Consultant to provide professional environmental consulting services for City (the "Services") 1 2 The Services shall be performed by Consultant in a professional manner, and Consultant represents that it has the skill and the professional expertise necessary to provide the Services to City at a level of competency presently maintained by other practicing professional consultants in the industry providing like and similar types of Services ARTICLE 2 — SERVICES OF CONSULTANT 2 1 The Services that Consultant shall perform are more particularly described in Exhibit "A," entitled "Scope of Services," including a project schedule, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference 2 2 Consultant shall comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations in the performance of this Agreement including, but not limited to, State prevailing wage laws ARTICLE 3 — RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY 3 1 City shall make available to Consultant information in its possession that may assist Consultant in performing the Services 3 2 City designates Brian Desatnik, Development Services Depai talent Director, or his designee, as City's representative with respect to performance of the Services, and such person shall have the authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City's policies and decisions with respect to performance of the Services ARTICLE 4 — PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES 4 1 Consultant shall perform and complete the Services in accordance with the project schedule The Services shall commence on the Effective Date of this Agreement and be completed on or before July 31, 2020 1 L \ca\djm\Agreements\E1'D Solutions Environment Agnt.EA 7 2.doc.in EA 7 2 (1 29 19) 4 2 If Consultant's Services include deliverable electronic visual presentation materials, such materials shall be delivered in a form, and made available to the City, consistent with City Council adopted policy for the same It shall be the obligation of Consultant to obtain a copy of such policy from City staff ARTICLE 5 — PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT 5 1 The total compensation for Consultant's performance of the Services shall not exceed the amount eighty two thousand five hundred ninety five dollars ($82,595) City shall pay Consultant on a time and matenals basis, up to the not to exceed amount, in accordance with Exhibit "B," entitled "Project Costs and Houily Rates," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference 5 2 Consultant shall submit an invoice to City describing the Services performed, the dates the Services were performed, and the numbei of hours spent and by whom, upon completion of the Services City shall pay Consultant no later than thirty (30) days after receipt and approval by City of Consultant's invoice 5 3 Any notice or othei communication required, or which may be given, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be in writing Any such notice shall be deemed delivered (i) on the date of delivery m person, (ii) five (5) days after deposit in first class certified, registered or express mail, with return receipt requested, (ni) on the actual delivery date if deposited with an overiught courier, or (iv) on the date sent by facsimile, if confirmed with a copy sent contemporaneously by first class, certified, registered or express mail, in each case properly posted and fully prepaid to the appropriate address set forth below, or such other address as a Party may provide notice m accordance with this section City. Basan Desatnik, Directoi Development Service Department 35 Cajon Street, Ste 20 P 0 Box 3005 (mailing) Redlands, CA 92373 bdesatnik@cityofredlands org (909) 798-7555 Consultant Jeremy Krout, President EPD Solutions, Inc 2 Park Plaza Suite 1120 Irvine, CA 92614 Jeremy@epdsolutions cam 949-794-1181 ARTICLE 6 — INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION 6 1 The following insurance coverage required by this Agreement shall be maintained by Consultant for the duration of its performance of the Services Consultant shall not perform any Services unless and until the required insurance listed below is obtained by Consultant Consultant shall provide City with certificates of insurance and endorsements evidencing such insurance prior to commencement of the Services Insurance policies shall include a provision prohibitmg cancellation or modification of the policy except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City 2 L lcaldjm\Ao eetnents\EP© Solutions Environment Agnt.EA 7 2.doc in EA 7 2 (1 29 19) A Woikers' Compensation and Employee's Liability insurance in the amount that meets statutory requirements with an insurance caner acceptable to City, 01 certification to City that Consultant is self-insured or exempt from the workers' compensation laws of the State of California Consultant shall execute and provide City with Exhibit "C" entitled "Woikers' Compensation Insurance Certification," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference prioi to performance of the Services B Comprehensive General Liability insurance with carriers acceptable to City in the minimum amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate, for public liability, property damage and personal injury is required City shall be named as an additional insured and such insurance shall be primary and non-contributing to any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City C Business Auto Liability coverage, with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liability This coverage shall include all Consultant owned vehicles used in connection with Consultant's provision of the Services, hired and non -owned vehicles, and employee non -ownership vehicles City shall be named as an additional insured and such insurance shall be primary and non-contributing to any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City D Consultant is expressly prohibited from assigning or subcontracting any of the Services without the prior wntten consent of City In the event of mutual agreement by the Parties to assign or subcontract a portion of the Services, Consultant shall add such assignee or subcontractor as an additional insured to the insurance policies required hereby and provide City with the insurance endorsements prior to any Services being performed by the assignee or subcontractor 6 2 Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, including attorneys' fees, arising from injury or death to persons 01 damage to property occasioned by any negligent act or omission by, or the willful misconduct of, Consultant, or its officers, employees and agents in performing the Services ARTICLE 7 — CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 7 1 Consultant covenants and represents that it does not have any investment or interest in any real property that may be the subject of this Agreement or any othei source of income, interest in real property 01 investment that would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant's Services Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder, no person having any such interest shall perform any Services under this Agreement 7 2 Consultant agrees it is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Pohtical Reform Act because Consultant 3 L lcaldjm\AgreementslEPD Solutions Environment AgnLEA 7 2,docjn EA 72 (1 29 19) A Does not make a governmental decision whether to (i) approve a rate, rule of regulation, 01 adopt or enforce a City law, (fi) issue, deny, suspend or revoke any City permit, license, application, certification, approval, order or similai authorization or entitlement, (iii) authorize City to entei into, modify or renew a contract, (iv) grant City approval to a contract that requires City approval and to which City is a party, or to the specifications foi such a contract, (v) grant City approval to a plan, design, report, study or similar item, (vi) adopt, of grant City approval of, policies, standards or guidelines for City or foi any subdivision thereof B Does not serve in a staff capacity with City and in that capacity, participate in making a governmental decision or otherwise perform the same 01 substantially the same duties for City that would otherwise be performed by an individual holding a position specified in City's Conflict of Interest Code under Government Code section 87302 7 3 In the event City determines that Consultant must disclose its financial interests, Consultant shall complete and file a Fair Political Practices Commission Form 700, Statement of Economic Interests, with the City Clerk's office pursuant to the written instructions provided by the City Clerk ARTICLE 8 — GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS 8 1 In the event any action is commenced to enforce of interpret any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement the prevailing Party shall, in addition to any costs and other relief, be entitled to the recovery of its reasonable attorneys' fees, including fees for the use of in-house counsel by a Party 8 2 Consultant shall not assign any of the Services, except with the prior written approval of City and in strict compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement Any assignment 01 attempted assignment without such prioi written consent may, in the sole discretion of City, results in City's immediate termination of this Agreement 8 3 Consultant is for all purposes under this Agreement an independent contractor and shall perform the Services as an independent contractor Neither City nor its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant 01 Consultant's employees, except as herein set forth Consultant shall supply all necessary tools and instrumentalities required to perform the Services Assigned personnel employed by Consultant are for its account only, and in no event shall Consultant or personnel retained by it be deemed to have been employed by City or engaged by City for the account of, or on behalf of City Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent, nor shall Consultant have any authority, express or implied, to bind City to any obligation 4 L lcaldunlAgreetnentslEPD Solutions Environment Ag nt.EA 7 2.doc.jn EA 7 2 (1 29 19) 8 4 This Agreement may be terminated by City, in its sole discretion, by providing not less than five (5) days prior written notice to Consultant of City's intent to terminate If this Agreement is terminated by City, an adjustment to Consultant's compensation shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit or unperformed Services, and (2) any payment due Consultant at the time of termination may be adjusted to the extent of any additional costs to City occasioned by any default by Consultant Upon receipt of a termination notice, Consultant shall immediately discontinue its provision of the Services and, within five (5) days of the date of the termination notice, deliver or otherwise make available to City, copies (in both hard copy and electronic form, where applicable) of project related data, design calculations, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and such other information and materials as may have been accumulated by Consultant in performing the Services Consultant shall be compensated on a pro -rata basis for Services completed up to the date of termination 8 5 Consultant shall maintain books, ledgers, invoices, accounts and other records and documents evidencing costs and expenses related to the Services for a period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant pursuant to this Agreement Such books shall be available at reasonable times for examination by City at the office of Consultant 8 6 This Agreement, including the Exhibits incorporated herein by reference, represents the entire agreement and understanding between the Parties as to the matters contained herein, and any prior negotiations, written proposals or verbal agreements relating to such matters are superseded by this Agreement Except as otherwise provided for herein, any amendment to this Agreement shall be in writing, approved by City and signed by City and Consultant 8 7 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California 8 8 If one or more of the sentences, clauses, paragraphs or sections contained in this Agreement is declared invalid, void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall be deemed severable from the remainder of this Agreement and shall not affect, impair 01 invalidate the remaining sentences, clauses, paragraphs or sections contained herein, unless to do so would deprive a Party of a material benefit of its bargain under this Agreement 5 L Ica\djm\Aa eernents\EPD Solutions Environment Ag]nt.EA 7 2.doc jn EA -7.2 (1.29 19) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of City and Consultant have signed in confirmation of this Agreement CITY OF DLANDS EPD SOLUTIONS, INC 101611-0A-- Jan]Comiell Assistant City Manager Attest e Donaldson, City Clerk 6 L 1ca\djm\Agreements\EPD Solutions Environment Agmt.EA-7.2.doco Jeiey Krout, P esident EA 7.2 (1.29.19) EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES Scope of Work The following tasks ore required to complete the environmental documentation for the Residence at Casa Lorna project. In the sections that follow, mare details are provided regarding how each task will be aa'Amplished, which team members will be responsible for each task, and the work products that will be produced. • Task 1 Kids Off Meeting • Task 2. Technical Studies • Task 3. Administrative Draft IS/MND • Task 4. Draft IS/MND and Notice of Intent • Task 5 Fnal IS/MND, Response to Comments, and Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program • Task 6. Notice of Determination • Task 7 Meetings and Public Hearings • Task S. Project Management Task 1 Kick Off Meeting As a first step is project inplementmion, EPD will coordinate with City staff to establish roles and protocols to guide communication between staff, EPD, the project applicant, and the applicant's consultants. The purpose of this step is to establish and maintain credibilty with the community and assist with maintaining efficiency throughout the CEQA process. EPD will schedule a project initiation meeting or conference call with City staff and the applicant's planning and design team to - 1 Obtain background information on the project, project plans, additional exiling relevant technical studies nor provided as part of RFP, and any other pertinent information; 2_ Discuss any updates to the technical studies are needed as a resift of peer review of tedircal studies; 3 Discuss the teams approach to the key issues and confirm project objectives; d Identify data needs and other information needed for EPD to complete its scope of work; and 5 Refine the project scope and schedule_ Subsequent to the meeting or call, and reviewing the protect files, EPD will prepare an updated schedule and list of additional data requirements. Meetings No. Formal Kick-off/ Project Initiation Meeting/Call Team Membet(sj Krout, I)abreva 7 L.1ca\dbm\Agreements\EPD Solutions Environment Agmt.EA 7 2.doc.jn EA 7.2 (1.29 19) Task 1 Deliverables No Format Description Team Member(s) 1 PDF/Word Refined Project Schedule Dobreva 1 PDF/Word 1 Identification of Additional Data Requirements Dobreva, Escario Task 2 Tedinical Studies 2 1 Peer Review of redinicof Studies As requested in the RFP, EPD will conduct CEQA adequacy and technical adequacy peer reviews of the completed tednical studies. In order to meet the City's expedited schedule, the peer review will be prepared prior to the kick-off meeting, outlined in Task 1 2 1 1 CEQA Adequacy Review Prior to the Kick Off Meeting in Task 1, EPD will conduct a review of the following technical studies/reports prepared for the proposed project for CEQA adequacy The EPD team will deterrmrne whether o need exists to update, supplement, and/or reevaluate specific issues/reports/led-mica! studies in preparation for an MND At the time this proposal was prepared, the biological and cultural studies were over a year old, which raises the possibility that they could be considered "stale,- particularly by the time the CEQA document is released for public review; therefore, we assume that the applicant will have the preparers submit letters updating the reports to state that the site conditions and original reports' findings have not clanged. • Biological Assessment [The Planning Associates) • Conceptual hydrology Study (DRC Engineering, Inc) • Geotechnical Engineering Investigation (Moore Twining Associates, Inc) • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Moore Twining Associates, km) • Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (DRC Engineering, Inc) 2 1.2 Technical Adequacy Review The EPD team will provide an independent, objective evaluation of the Cultural and Traffic studies to determine whether they are technically adequate and if a need exists to update, supplement, and./or reevaluate specific issues_ 2 1.2 (a) Cutfura/ Resource Survey Peer Review The Cultural/Paleontological Assessment prepared by VCS Environmental will be peer-reviewed by Material Culture Consulting (MCC)_ The peer review will focus on methodology, findngs, and recommendations of the applicant's Cultural/Paleontological Assessment. MCC has staff who are qualified cultural resource professionals with expertise in historic archaeology, history, ardtitedural history, ethnography regulatory compliance, historic preservation and GIS data management MI staff met the professional Secretary of Interior Qualifications for Archaeology and Historic Preservation MCC's ethnographers have decades of experience in consulting with Native Americans to understand the inventory and traditional significance of cultural resources_ MCC has performed work previously within the City of Redlands. Below are some examples of projects that MCC has completed in the recent past • Southern California Edison Company's Tennessee -Yucaipa 66kV Deteriorated Pole Replacement Project (TD1162070) on Private Lands within Casty of Redlands, San Bernardino County, California {May -June 2018). • SCE Transmission tare Rating and Remediation / General Order 131-D Evaluation Protect- Crafton- Mentone Zanja 115kV, on Private Lands within City of Redlands, Mentone, and Yucaipa, San Bernardino County, California (June September 2017). 8 L IcaldamlAgreements\EPD Solutions Environment Agmt.EA 7.2.doc jn EA -7.2 (1.29 19) EPD will coordinate wrth MCC to determine if the study has been prepared is accordance with the requirements of the Crty of Redlands and a adequate for sunenarization into the IS/MND Upon completing the review, we will prepare a technical memorandum assessing the scope, level of detail, completeness, and relevance of the data and analysis provided in Cuttural Resources Assessment EPD will work with the City's staff and if authorized by the City, will communicate with VCS Ermromental to ensure that the assessment and input provided is adequately addressed in the revisions to the Cultural Resources Assessment This scope of work assumes will be made following one round of technical review 2 1.2 (b) Traffic Impact Analysis Peer Review The Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIA) prepared by Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers will be peer- reviewed by EPD's in-house traffic engineer The peer review will focus on the methodology, findings and recommendations of the TIA_ We will determine if the report was prepared in accordance with the requirements of the City of Redlands, San Bernardino County CM? (as applicable), CEQA and Measure U The peer -review will also determine if the TIA has been prepared using standard traffic engineering methods and is adequate for summarization into the IS/MND Upon completing the review, EPD will prepare a technical memorandum assessing the scope, level of detail, completeness, and relevance of the data and analysis provided in the TIA EPD will work with the City s tedinical staff and if authorized by the City, will follow through Linscoi Law & Greenspan Engineers to determine if the assessment and nput provided is adequately addressed in the revisions to the TIA_ This scope of work assumes changes to the existing technical studies/reports based on comments from our in-house staff will be made following one round of technical review. it is also assumed that only one routed of review of the revisions to the technical studies/reports by EPD wi11 be necessary to ensure changes were addressed 2.2. Preparation of New Technical Studies EPD will coordinate with sub-consultar►ts to prepare the following tedinical studies as requested in the RFP and as now required by the updated CEQA Guidelines: • Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas & Energy Demand Analysis (Urban Crossroads] • Noise Study/Acoustical Analysis (Urban Crossroads] • Visual Simulations (EPD) • Optional Health Risk Assessment (Urban Crossroads) 2.2 i Air Qualify and Greenhouse Gas Inrpac€ Analysis Air Qualify Urban Crossroads scoped work serves to meet the City of Redlands and South Coast Air Quality Management District's requirements for preparation of a CEQA Air Qual6ty Analysis_ The following tasks are to be conducted by Urban Crossroads to produce an air quality impact analysis on the proposed protect_ • Evaluate the existing conditions of the project study area; this will include gathering background air quality data, Ioccd wind patterns in the study area and identifying applicable rules, plans and thresholds of significance. • identify construction -related air qualify impacts from associated construction activities at the protect sire which may include demolition, import/export of fill dirt, mass grading, building construction, paring, concrete pouring, etc • Evaluate operational emissions for the proposed project, based upon trip generation projections provided as part of the traffic study Peak hour trips will be used along with estimates of the types of trips generated and average travel speeds to estimate daily emissions generated by the project. In addition, emissions from other operational sources suds as heaters, air conditioners, water heaters, consumer products, cargo handing equipment and lawn care equipment will also be considered_ • A sceeneig-levet CO Hotspot analysis of future conditions at key intersections located in the prated 9 L•1ca\djmlAgreements\EPD Solutions Environment Agmt.EA 7.2.doc jn EA 7.2 (1.29.19) study area will be prepared It is anticipated that a qualitative discussion on CO Hotspot potential and rationale as to why more detailed modeling of CO Flotspom analysis is not required. • Perform Construction Locafized Significance Threshold (LST] analysis as recommended by the SCAQMD for coistrucnon activity Given the protect size it is anticipated that the SCAQMIYs screening lookup tables will be utilized to determine IST impacts to sensitive receptors in the project vicinity it is anticipated that no dispersion modeling will be required_ If potential significant impacts are identified and more detailed dispersion modeling is necessary a separate scope and fee will be provided actordirig ly • Evaluate potential odor impacts resulting from the proposed project. • Qualitatively discuss cumulative impacts within the context of planned and foreseeable projects for short-term construction and tong -term operational activity A list.' approach per CEQA will be utilized when discussing cumulative impacts using the lin of amxrlative projects identified in the traffic report Since the basin is in non -attainment the determination of significance will likely be based on whether or not the Project results in a substantial incremental increase • Identify and recommended mitigation measures that are feasible to implement and that will reduce any potential impacts to the maximum extent possible. • Prepare m air quality report that incorporates the findings and alt supporting calculations • Revise the air quality impact analysis report based on continents provided by City for up to one review cycle • Respond to comments received during the MND public review period Greenhouse Gas Emissians • Evaluate applicable federal and state regulatory requirements (ie_, AB32, SCAQMD, CARB thresholds) Qualitatively discuss the effects of GHG emissions on regional air quality • Evaluate applicable GHG emissions associated with heavy-duty constriction equipment combustion that will likely occur during the various phases of construction. Data provided by the project team and technical air quality analysis will be utilized in characterizing GHG-generating activities. • Evaluate Increase in applicable GHG emissions associated with tang -term mobile source activity data available from the technical air quality analysis and traffic impact analysis will also likely be utilized in calculating the emissions inventory • The emissions evaluation for short -tern construction, long-term mobile source, and long-term stationary source activity will consider project design, and mitigation measures that have the potential to reduce GHG emissions_ • Prepare a greenhouse gas emissions report documenting the results of the study The report will define appropriate and feasible mitigation to address any significant impacts related to climate change, if found in the analysis. Energy Demand Analysis • Prepare an energy consumption analysis as required by State CEQA Guidelines Appendix F • identify applicable local, state and federal energy regulations and programs applicable to the project • Quantify direct and indirect electricity energy consumption from the project • Quantify natural gas energy consumption from the project • Identify transportation fuels supply, demand, consumption, and infrastructure_ • Identify Energy Efficiency features of the project, including but not Greited to the use of renewable energy requirements, and reduced energy demand through the reduction of potable water usage • The project's impacts based on the State CEQA Guidelines Appendix F and provide mitigation measures (if necessary) to reduce impacts to the maximum extent possible • Provide an energy analysis summary and tables for inclusion in the MND_ 10 L Icaldjm\Agreements\EPD Solutions Environment Agmt.EA-7.2.doc.jn EA 7.2 (1.29 19) 2.2.2 Noise Study /Acoustical Analysis Urban Crossroads will develop a Noise Study/ Acoustical Analysis to satisfy City of Redlands noise criteria and support the CEQA review process- The following tasks are to be conducted by Urban Crossroads to produce a Noise Study/ Acoustical Analysis on the proposed project • Existing Conditions Identify and review applicable, Federal, State and Local Noise criteria_ This includes the Gty of Redlands Noise Element and Municipal Code to determine appropriate Horse standards and significance criteria • Review the Protect study area to identify noise -sensitive uses as well as the source and location of potential noise generators. This information will be used to select the noise monitoring locations. Collect long-term 24-hour ambient noise level measurements in the Project study area at up to six locations to quantify the existing noise environment • Offsite Traffic Noise Analysis Identify the off-site average daily traffic volumes and related noise levels for existing, opening year and long-range conditions from the 11A. • Calculate the existing, opening year and future 70, 65 and 60 dBA CI'IEL noise level contour boundaries for the baseline (existing) conditions, opening year and future conditions on up to twenty study area roadway segments • C:aiculate the future project contributions by comparing the 'with' and 'without" project noise contours on the study area roadways for the proposed project Determine if the project will create a significant noise impact on any analyzed roadway segments_ • Onsite Traffic Noise Analysis Utilize a version of the FHWA noise prediction model to determine the exterior noise level impacts from the adjoining roadways_ Noise level impacts will be based on the future worst- case traffic conditions, for noise receptors located In the outdoor living areas and at the building facades_ c Determine the minimum exterior noise mitigation measures (noise barriers) needed to satisfy the appropriate City of Redlands noise level criteria- Identify noise barrier locations and heights including the top of barrier locations will be provided for all lots. • Estimate the interior noise levels for the project Identify potential interior noise impacts and recommend mitigation measures (minimum sound transmission class ratings) needed to meet the City of Redlands interior standards_ • Operational Noise Analysis c. Collect reference noise level measurements to represent the expected stationary source impacts associated with the proposed Casa Loma Residential project land uses including, roof -top air conditioning units, parking lot vehicle movements, entry gates, playground octivities, outdoor pool/spa activities, and trash enclosures_ Evaluate the potential stationary source noise impacts associated with the operation of the project and recommend mitigation measures to reduce the potential noise impacts to any nearby noise -sensitive uses_ c Assess the operational noise impacts expected at the nearby noise -sensitive uses The analysis will include a map showing the relationship between the noise source and each surrounding noise -sensitive receptor raking into account rhe distance and existing noise barriers. c Identify potential noise abatement measures to ensure that the noise levels satisfy the applicable City of Redlands criteria at the sensitive receiver locations- • Construction Analysis Based on input from the project team and die Air Quality study; identify the mix, quantity, and duration of planned construction activities • Assess potential noise impacts associated with temporary construction activities art the project site using reference noise level measurements of similar activities. • Provide a detailed noise impact and vibration analysis associated with temporary construction 11 L.Icaldjm\Agreements\EPD Solutions Environment Ab nt.EA 7.2.doc Jn EA 7.2(1.2919) activities at the project site and estimate the impacts expected at nearby noise -sensitive uses, including the adjacent residential uses Recommend the appropriate mitigation and/or project design measures to ensure that the noise and vibration impacts satisfy the I1ty of Redlands criteria and established CEQA thresholds of significance • Noise Study/ Acoustical Analysis Summarize the results of the study rn a Noise Study/ Acoustical Analysis report addressing the potential impacts assooated with the project and provide the appropriate mitigation measures to reduce the impacts to levels of fess than significant a Revise the Noise Study/ Acoustical Analysis report based on comments from Coy staff for up to one review cyde ▪ Respond to comments received during the MND public review period 22.3 Visual Simulations As requested by the RFP, EPO will prep -are photo -simulations to demonstrate the proposed projects potential impacts to aesthetics, especially in terms of building height and impacts to views of the San Bernardino Mountains_ The scope of work assumes the applicant's architect will provide Sketch -Up models for the design, from which photo simulations will be prepared to determine the project's visual impact to public views of the San Bernardino Mountains. Two view -simulation are assumed; one looking north on Occidental Drive and another looking east across the southern portion of the site. 2.2.4 Health Risk Assessment (Optional) As discussed in Task 22 1, potential health impacts to the nearest sensitive receptors associated construction will be evaluated as part of the LST analysis the Air Quality and GI -IG Analysis_ EPD and Urban Crossroads have reviewed the project's location, adjacent land uses, and proposed operations, and believe a construction and operational health risk assessment is not warranted because the residential project would not generate toxic air contaminants (EACs), nor would the project expose proposed future residents to TACs_ However, a health risk assessment was requested as part of the RFP, and the cost is provided as an optional task should the City or Applicant determine that further analysis is needed_ Meeiinas No. 1 Format Internal Meeting with City Staff prior to Planning Commission Team Member(s) Itobteva Task 1 Deliverables No. Format Description Team Memberis) 1 PDF/Word Refined Project Schedule Albert 1 PDF/Word Peer Review Mento — CEQA Adequacy Dobreva, Albert, Macias, Escario 1 PDF/Word Peer Review Memo— Technical Adequacy Pech (Cultural and Traffic] Dobreva, Albert, Macias, Escario T PDF/Word Air Quality & GHG Impact Analysis Dobreva 1 PDF/Word Noise Study Dobreva 2 PDF/Word Visual Simulations Albert 1 PDF, Word Health Risk Assessment (Opfionai) Dobreva 12 L 1ca\djm\Agreements\EPD Solutions Environment Agmt.EA-7.2.doc.jn EA -7 2 (1.29 19) Task 3 Administrative Draft IS/MND 3 1 Project Description Preparation of a Project Description is one of the first critical steps in the CEQA process. Successful CEQA compliance requires a dear definition of the project and its components_ EPD will develop a Project Description that is accurate, complete, comprehensive, stable and finite m order to analyze the impacts accurately and fully The Project Desaiptian will describe the implementation schedule and phasing for construction and operation of the project Further all physical elements of the project will be described for both the construction and operation of the protect, including onsite fadllties and related offsite improvements for public services, as well as interim impacts related to protect phasing, if any EPD will also collaborate with City staff and the Applicant to confirm that critical components of the project are fully defined. As appropriate the EPD team will confer with City staff to discuss the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. This early evaluation of impacts will allow the City to request modifications to the project in order to minimize environmental impacts, a process known as "mitigation by design.' This process will be aided, simplified, and enhanced by the EPD teams already -extensive knowledge of the enrmronmental conditions impacting the region EPD will revise the project description bawd on the City's comments and will produce a final version for use in the Administrative Draft 1S/MND. 3.2 Administrative Draft 11* Administrative Draft IS/MND will be comprehensive, accurate, objective, and will fully comply with CEQA and all applicable guidance and procedures established by 11* Csty of Redlands_ The IS/MND will dearly identify and address all potential issues facing the Residence at Casa Loma Project h will be dearly written and will avoid** use of technical jargon, to the extent possible, so that the document is easily understood The IS/MND will include a discussion of each Environmental Checklist impact resource topic that will describe the existing conditions, evaluation of potential environmental impacts including temporary [construction related) and Tong -terns (operational) impacts, existing regulations that would reduce potential impacts and identification of nsisigation measures, as necessary The existing conditions of the protect site will be used to set the baseline for the environmental analysis Although** Administrative Draft IS/MND will address each of the environmental topics in the CEQA Guidelines, the analysis will focus on the following issues: Aeslhetra The project site is located on a majority vacant lond with the exception of four structures on the eastern portion of the site The site is adjacent to developed areas, roadways, and open space_ North and west of the project are existing single-family homes. To the northeast and immediately adjacent to the site are muni -family residential. South of the project site is a combination of single-family homes and vacant land. Above -ground power lies run along 11* west side of CJcadeatal Drive and the north side of Lugonra Avenue. There is a view of the San Bernardino mountains from the project site As requested in the RFP and discussed in Task 1.2.3, EPD will produce a visual simulation to assist in the analysis of the potential impacts to aesthetics, we expect the impacts to be less than significant The IS/MND will discuss potential visual and aesthetic impacts related to scenic vistas, the visual quality and character of the site and surrounding land uses, and lighting and glare. The analysis will discuss it* project's proposed setbacks landscaping, height scale and design in relation to the existing development in the area. in addition, the proposed exterior lighting would be evaluated_ Based on the cursory review of the project area and proposed project, it is anticipated that with implementation of the City standards and design standards, substantial impacts would not occur However, the IS/MND analysis will provide a detailed review of the proposed sire plan lighting plan, landscaping plan, and ardiitectural treatments for it* protect and provide mitigation measures, if necessary 13 L•IcaldjtnlAgreements\EPD Solutions Environment Agmt.EA-7.2.doc jn EA -7 2 (1.29 19) Agriculture and Forestry Resources Agricultural production is not currently taking place on the project site bur could hove occurred in the past The General Plan designates the north portion of the site as High Density Residential and the southern portion as Low Density Residential. The Gty's zoning designation of the project site is approximately 1,5 acres of A-1 (Agricultural), 3 15 acres of R-1 (Single Family Residential), and 1 1 acre of R-2 (Multiple Family Residential) District. The project would require a zone change to R-2 2000 (Multiple Family Residential) District The project will require a General Plan Amendment to change the designation to be all High Density Residential_ The project would require a zone change from A-1 to R-2-2000_ According to California Department of Conservation's Important Farmland Pinder, the project site is designated as "Urban and Built -Up Land" 1$/MND will evaluate the project site's suitability for a change in the designation and the impacts of converting it to residential zoning and land use. Air Quality Urban Crossroads w8I prepare an Air Quality Impact Assessment The IS/MND will evaluate regional and local emissions and odors for construction and operation of the project The IS/MND will compare the findings of the assessment with thresholds of significance established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the thresholds defined in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines Further, the assessment would evaluate whether the project would be consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan EPD will incorporate the findings of the air quality assessment into the IS/MND. Biological -Resources The project site consists of vacant land with the exception of four structures and accessory buildings. Based on the results of the Biological Assessment (literature review and field survey) by The Planning Associates and our CEQA adequacy review, EPD will take the findings and recommendations to assess rhe project's potential impacts to biological resources The Biological Assessment found no state or federally protected plants or wildlife, or critical habitat for federally endangered species. Further discussion of the biological resources findings will be incorporated into the Draft IS/MND Cultural Resources A Cultural Resources Assessment has been prepared by VCS Enviromnentol and a peer review will be conducted by the EPD team. According to initial findings from the study no cultural resources hove been previously recorded on the project site. The structures on the site were evaluated for historical significance and were determined not eligible for any listings. The IS/MND will include an analysis on the potential impacts by the project as they are related to the demolition of existing structures older than 50 years of age. Similarly, a paleontological assessment is included in the Cultural Resources Assessment for the site by VCS Environmental to assess paleontological sensitivity and potential recommendations for monitoring of the sire. EP will summarize the findings into the IS/MND Impacts are expected to be less than significant Geology and Soils A geotechnical engineering investigation was prepared for the project site by Moore Twining Associates, bsc From a geotechnical engineering and engineering geologic point of view, the initial analysis determines that the site is considered suitable for the proposed residential development The results, findings, and recommendations of the study will be incorporated into the Geology and Soils section of the IS/MND_ This section will briefly define the existing geologic, soils, and groundwater dsaractenstics onsite, identify regional seismic influences, and note and explain the characteristics of any areas containing constraints to site development Mitigation measures known to be successful in addressing the various geom.-clinical constraints will be defined, including reference to existing geological and soils tests and plan -checking requirements administered by the City of Redlands. Greenhouse Gas Emissions A Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Analysis will be prepared by Urban Crossroads and incorporated into the IS/MNl) to evaluate the potential impacts associated with the projects generation of GHG emissions during construction 14 L IcaldlmlAgreementslEPD Solutions Environment Agmt.EA 7 2.doc.ln EA 72 (1.29 19) and operational activities. Furthermore, the protect will be analyzed for consistency with County of San Bernardino GHG Plop, Senate BBI 32, and the Global Warning Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 321_ EPD will summarize the findings of both studies into the IS/MND Hazards and Hazardous Materials The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by Moore Twining Associates, Inc will be used to evaluate potential impacts in the IS/MND. Based on our initial review the Phase 1 ESA, the site appears to have been occupied by a mix of orchards and residential homes from at least 1930 until sometime around 1975 and occupied by the residential homes and vacant land since. No recognized environmental conditions exist on the site The findings of the Phase I ESA will he incorporated into the IS/MND. In addition, the IS/MNI) will describe construction and operation of the proposed project and any potential hazards or hazardous conditions will be identified, and mitigation will be mduded, as necessary Impacts are expected to be less than significant, through adherence with recommendations in the Phase 1 ESA_ Hydrology and Water Quality Implementation of the proposed project will convert large areas of pervious surfaces to impervious surfaces on the project site The Conceptual Hydrology Study prepared for the project by 1AC: Engineering, Inc will be summarized and incorporated into the IS/MND to describe both the existing and proposed conditions According to the hydrology study, there are no existing public drainage facilities located near the project site The protect would construct onsite storm drain facilities and an underground storage system The storm runoff will be conveyed by the proposed storm drains to a pre-treatment unit then to the underground infiltration/detention system The proposed outlet pipes and parkway drains will discharge the allowable flow to °cadental Drive. The IS/MND will detail the hydrologic changes that would occur from the proposed project, the findings of the Prel emory Water Quality Management Plan (DRC Engineering, Inc.) and how the project would comply with the existing stormwater drainage and hydrology regulations. Impacts are expected to be less than significant Land Use and Flaming As discussed, the project would require a General Pian amendment and zone change to accommodate the 122 - unit multi -family apartment complex. Analysis of project impacts will focus on project consistency with the goals and policies of the City s General Plan and zoning code Compatibility of the proposed project with the surrounding land uses will also be discussed, including whether the project would result in physical division of an existing community, or would conflict with a plan or policy that was adopted to avoid or reduce an environmental effect. Noise A Noise Study/ Acoustical Analysis will be prepared by Urbon Crossroads (discussed in Task 222 above . The findings of the study will support analysis in the IS/MND of the potential noise enpacls, including interior, exterior and constriction noise. It is anticipated that noise kapott; can be mitigated to less than significant level EPD will incorporate the information from the Noise Study ki the IS/MND, along with the required mitigation measures, as necessary Population and Housing The project would develop a 122 -unit multi -family apartment complex and therefore hostile potential to induce population growth. Based on the population projections in the City's General Plan of 2.65 persons per household, the project has the potential to increase the population by 323 persons. An evaluation of the of impacts to population and housing will be provided in the iS/MNO Public Services The IS/MND will identify the location of the service providers in the project area, including_ law enforcement, fire protection, schools, parks, and other public facilities. EPD will contact existing service providers and fadlities that would be affected by the protect to confirm available service levels and capacities to serve the proposed land uses. We will identify the demand placed on these services on the basis of standard planning factors 15 L 1ca\djm\Agreements\EPD Solutions Environment Agmt.EA 7.2.doc.jn EA 7.2 (1 29 19) provided by each agency or from the City's General Pion, and will evaluate the ability of service providers to accommodate projected growth based on intensity of the proposed development finally we will coordilate with the service to determine the need for additional public facilities or personnel to serve the proposed project and maintain adequate levels of service. Recreation The IS/MMD will identify existing recreational facilities in the projea vicinity, discuss the deinond 1* 323 new residents would have on existing facilities, and will discuss any impacts associated with the open space components_ Transportation and Traffic A traffic impact analysis (11A) prepared by Linscon, Law & Greenspan (LLG) evaluated five offsite intersections and the project driveway on University Street at Cornell Avenue. Impacts to the study intersections were analyzed in the existing condition and in year 2020 and 2040. According to the 11A, the impact can be mitigated. The TIA provides mitigation costs and fair -Mare calculations, but the TIA does not identify whether the mitigation measures are included in a fee program or are planned as part of the City's capital improvement program ((IP]. This issue, and any other identified in the peer -review, will be rrrvestigated by EPI}. The methodologies, results of the TIA, and proposed mitigation will be summarized and included in the IS Tribal Cultural Resources It is our understanding that the City, as it* Lead Agency, has already initiated the Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) process by coordinating tribal outreach and consultation. This section es the IS/MMD will describe any resources impacted, if any, identified as a result of the native American consultation process and will provide mitigation treasures agreed upon as necessary by the City to reduce potential impacts to a less than significant levet EPD has extensive experience in facilitating AB 52 consultations and can assist the City, if requested, as a value- added service included as part of the scope of work_ It should be noted that because the project includes a General Plan amendment, the City must also conduct a consultation under Senate Bill 18, which has a longer 90 -clay timeline_ utilities To determine the effect on existing utility providers and infrastructure, the 2015 San Bernardino Valley Regional Urban Water Management Plan, the City's Sewer System Management Plan, and CalRecycle data will be reviewed to determiie the current levels of service and the prajees potential impact on the dry utilities (natural gas, electricity, and cable service), solid waste, wastewater treatment and distribution, and potable water supply and distribution. The analysis will determine whether utility facilities and services could be extended to the project sire, while maintaining existing levels of service es areas already served. It tis antiapated that there are no significant imposts related to utilities. Mitigation measures will be provided, if necessary, to reduce significant impacts related to utilities. Mandatory Findings of Significance This section wdl summarize findings from other sections related to the potential of the project to degrade ttie environment, reduce habitat effect wildlife and plant populations, and eliminate important examples of California history or prehistory A a/imitative impacts analysis will be prepared and will focus on the potential environmental impacts from this proposed protect, along with other proposed and reasonably foreseeable projects in the area_ EPD will use the list of cum itative projects in the traffic study, and update rt in coordination. with City staff as necessary to evaluate and discuss the project's contribution to the overall cumulative baseline to identify any potential "cumulatively considerable" impacts. Additionally the analysis within this section will discuss the projects potential to result in environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects (directly or indirectly] DO human beings. 16 L Icaldjm\AgreementslEPD Solutions Environment Agmt.EA-7.2.doc..in EA -7.2 (1.29 19) Adrn nislrofrve Review Draft The Administrative Draft IS/MND will be submitted to City staff for review within d5 days of receipt of authorization to proceed. Our proposed schedule and budget assume that a complete administrative draft document will be prepared for review and comment which is more efficient than submittal of selected sections on an incremental basis. Additionally, it is also assumed that all Gty staff and Applicant comments concerning rhe administrative draft IS/MND will be consolidated and transmitted in writing or via email to EPI) at the same time. Task 3 Deliverables No Format Description 1 PDF/Word Project Description 1 PDF/Word Administrative Draft IS/MIJD Task 4 Drat Initial Study, MND and Notice of Intent The comments received from review of the Administrative Draft IS/MND will be incorporated to prepare the Draft IS/MND document A Proof -check Draft IS/MND will be submitted to the City, in additional to a draft Notice of Intent (NU) and a draft distribution Est that would include regional agencies and persons requesting information will be submitted to the City for review and comment EPD will also work is dose collaboration with the City to distribute the Draft IS/MND circulate public notices, and meet the C.EQA filing requirements After the City directs EPD to release the Draft I5/MND document for public review, EPD will be responsible for printing and distributng the environmental document and preparng the necessary forms, and will distribute them to all identified local, regional and State agencies, as well as interested Tribal Governments within 5 days_ The public review period for the lS/MND will be 30 days. Task 4 Deliverables No. Formal Description 1 PDF/Work Proof -check Draft iSiMND 1 PDF/Word Draft IS/MN) 25 CD Draft IS/MND 25 Print 1 Print Nlbl Task 5 Final Initial Study/MND, Response to Comments and Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Programs 5 1 Response to Comments Although not mandated by CEQA, ETD will prepare responses to comments recessed on the IS/MND and prepare a Final IS/MND to enable Qty decision makers to adequately consider and address any agency, organization, or community comments and concerns. Following receipt of all comments on the 1S/MND, a Response to Comments section will be created for the Finol IS/MND, which will contain an introduction describing the public review process concerning the IS/MND, copies of all continent letters received, plus written responses to all comments Responses will focus on comments that address the adequacy of the IS/MND Comments that do not address IS/MND adequacy will be noted as such and no further response will be provided unless deemed necessary by the City It is difficufr to predict the number of comment letters that will be received in response to the Draft IS/MND As an estimate, the proposed budget assumes a usual number of comment letters related to the environmental analysis will be received, and includes approximately 25 hours of professional staff time plus some technical 17 L 1ca\djm\Agreements\EPD Solutions Environment Agmt.EA-7 2.doc .in EA 7.2 (1.29 19) input from Urban Crossroads for this task We understand the City asks for a collection of all public comments and comment letters and the Responses to Comments to be submit electrically for City's review whin 14 days_ The budget for the Final 1S/MND is an estimate only and assumes that no additional basic research will be required to respond to comments, that the comments will be directed at the substance and tedmical adequacy of the IS/MND, and that the comments will be compiled by the City and transmitted in writing or via e-mail to EPD_ If an unexpectedly large volume of comments is received, or if certain comments result is the need for substantial response, or new research or analysis, the initial budget may not be sufficient. Should this situation become apparent, we will discuss this concern with the City before the responses budget is consumed and determine an appropnate course of action_ We also understand that the City asks for a hardcopy of the Response to Continents document within 5 days after City's approval of the Response to Comments. For the purposes of this proposal, we assume that only one concurrent review of the Finol IS/MND by the Applicant and City staff will be necessary, and that one set of consolidated comments will be provided to EPD by the City Modification to the scope of work, budget, and time frame may be necessary if additional administrative reviews are required_ 5.2 Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program Although not referenced in the RFP, since the project is expected to be an MND, a Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program (MMRP) would be required_ EPI) will prepare the MMRP pursuant to Section 21.081.6 of the Public Resources Code The MMRP will be defined through working with Cary staff to identify appropriate monitoring steps/procedures in order to provide a boars for monitoring such measures during and upon project implementation_ it will be it standard City format and will identify the significant impacts that would result from the prefect; proposed mitigation measures for each impact, the timing at whids the measures will need to be conducted; the entity responsible for implementing the mitigation measure; and the City department or other agency responsible for monitoring the mitigation effort and ensuring ns success_ The MMRP will be submitted to the applicant and City staff in conjunction with the submittal of the Foal IS/MND. Task 5 Deliverables No Formai Description I PDFilNord Admin. Draft Reponses to Comments 1 PDF/Word Final IS/MND and MMRP 25 25 CD Print Final 1S/MND and MMRP Task 6_ Notice of Determination Within 5 days of the Fnal MND adoption, EPD will file a Notice of Determination (NOD) with the State Clearinghouse and the San Bernardino County Clerk. The NOl) will be hand delivered so there is a record of receipt Please not that it is necessary for EPD to file the required California Department of Fish and Game (CDFGI filing fees with the County Clerk at the time of the NOD filing_ It rs mnidpated that the Applicant will provide a check for the County Clerk within two days of MND adoption; the 2018 MND filing fee is 52,28075 Task 6 Deliverables No Format Description PDF/Word NOD 18 L•1ca\djm\Agreements\EPD Solutions Environment Agtnt.EA-72.doc jn EA 7.2 (1.29 19) Task 7 Meetings and Public Hearings In addition to the kick-off meeting in Task 1 our scope of work and cost estimate assume participation/attendance by EPD's director and/or project manager at one additional in-person meeting, and attendance at two public hearings. The meetings and public hearings are listed below • 1 in-person meeting with City staff pnor to a Planning Commission • 1 Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission • 2 Planning Commission hearing for a decision on the project • 1 City Caancil hearing At the public hearing, EPD will provide explanation of the CEQA process and answer questions related to the environmental documentation_ EPD will assist with preparation of PowerPoert presentations and graphic materials for each public hearing The nature and content of these meetings will be coordinated with Crty, and the Gy will schedule and conduct public hearings and meetings. Additional meeting and/or hearing attendance by EPO staff upon the City's or Applicants request will be billed on a time -and -materials basis in accordance with the hourly rates for the personnel involved, as included in this proposal Task 7 Deliverables No. Formal Description 1 Meeting 1n -person meeting with City staff 1 Heorir9 Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission 2 Hearings Planning Commission 1 Hearings City Council Task 8 Project Mtmagernent EPI}s Project Manager will coordinate closely with the Applicant and City staff to ensure that the IS/MND and associated documents delivered to the City and the Applicant are legally defensible, actuate, and useful to decision makers considering the approval of the project The project manager will also mord-snate with the City staff throughout she process not only to streamline the CEQA process, but to avoid or anticipate any changes that could result in delays. The project manager will be the key contact for the City and will be responsible for managing (1) IS/MND task scheduling and assignment management of resources, monitoring of costs, and schedule adherence; (2) consultation arid coordination with local and state agencies relative to the environmental document and the environmental review process; (3) coordination and communications with the Applicant's and City's project team to ensure that City policies, procedures, and any applicable codes are complied with and, where applicable, are incorporated into the IS/MND; (4) ensunng that the environmental review process and the IS/MND sansfy the statutes and guidelines of CEQA and the Crty of Redlands' CEQA procedures; and [5) representing the consultant team in public meetings and conference calls as requested by the Gty The managementtosk includes lime for weekly progress reports and calls, and is budgeted at 1 hour per week for the Project Manager, Kannie Dobreva, and 1 hour per month for the Principal -in -Charge, Jeremy Kraut for the duration of the 6 -month project schedule. Additional conference call participation by EPD staff upon the City's or Applicant's request will be billed an a time-card-marenats basis in accordance with the hourly rates for the personnel involved, as induded in this proposal 19 L 1.caldjm\Agreements\EPD Solutions Environment Agmt.EA 7.2.doc jn EA -7.2 (1.29 19) SCHEDULE Based on the availabTty of a complete project description and supporting technical analyses/studies {as described above) and upon project initiation, the preparation and processing of the lS/MND is anticipated to require approximately five months to complete, as outlined in the proposed schedule below The draft schedule assumes that the notice to proceed will be provided to EPD Solutions by the end of August 2019 Draft Proied Schedule Task Duration Months Task 1. Kick off Meeting 1 Week August Task 2 Technical Studies Trak 2.1. Review of Technical Studies 1 Week Late Aug/ Early September Task 2.2 Preparation of New Technical Studies 3 Weeks after Fina[ Site Plan (concurrent with Task 1 if plans are already finalized) Late September/ Early October Task 3. Administrative Draft 1S/MND 5 Weeks (preparation, concurrent with Task 2_l; 2 weeks after completion of Task Z2) 1 Weeks - City Review November Task 4 Drat! IS MND 1 Weeks - EPD Revision 1 Weeks City Review of Public Review Administrative Draft Late October/ Early November 1S/MND Pubic Review 30 days Late November / Early December Task 5 Final I„MND 1 Week — EPD Prepare Mid -December Task 5.1. Response la Carameotr 2 Weeks — EPD Prepare (concurrent with Task 5) 1 Weeks—Gly Review Late December/ Early January Task 5.2. MMRP 1 Week (Concurrent with Task 5 and November Task 6. Notice of Determination1 Day {Filed after Qty Corssui Hearing) February/March Task 7. Meetings and Public Hearings 8 Weeks Mardi/April Task 8. Project Managernent Ongoing Ongoing for 6 months 20 L: lcaldjutlAgreements\EPD Solutions Environment Agmt.EA-7.2.doc.in EA 7.2 (1.29 (9) EXHIBIT "B" PROJECT COSTS AND HOURLY RATES FEE/COST PROPOSAL StaffMerrber Jeremy Kraut 'Connie Dobrava Renee Escario Meghon Macias Rafik Albert 5rundon Whalen EPO Labor TrialCollate Malarial Material Urban Crossroads TOTAL LABOR Hourly Rate $195 5175 5160 5200 5175 5135 Proposed Work Soope Tasks Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours Hours $ $ $ Task 1 Kick-off Meeting 3 3 3 9 $ 1.515 $ 1,513 Task 2. Tedinicol Studies Task 2.1 Review of Tedhnkal Studies 2.1 1. CEOA Adequacy Review 2 4 1 2 9 $ 1,435 $ 1,433 2.12 Technical Adequacy Review 2 I 16 19 5 3,710 $ 3,740 $ 6,950 2.1 Preparation of Now Technical 5tudes 2.2.1 Air Quality #mpact, GHG Analysis and Energy Demand Analysis I 1 2 S 310 5 11,440 5 11,750 2.22. Noise Study A¢austical Analysis 1 1 1 3 $ 470 5 8,950 S 9,420 2-23. Visual Simuktian 13 25 1 273 $ 4,750 $ 4,750 Tosk 3. Admin Draft 15/"MND 4 32 10 6 8 63 123 $18,285 515,255 Task 4. Draft l5,' MND and NOI f 4 3 1 2 20 31 $ 4,625 $ 4,625 Task 5. Final 1S/MM3 6 1 1 11 19 S 2,870 5 2,870 Task 5.1 Respanse to Comment 2 3 3 2 1 12 25 $ 3,910 $ 500 $ 4,410 Task 52MMRP 1 6 7 $ 985 $ 955 Task 6. Notice of Deternsinalion 1 1 2 $ 310 $ 310 Task 7. Meetings & Pub3c Hearings 5 18 12 9 44 $ 7.740 $ 7,740 Task & Protect Management 2 15 11 28 $ 4,775 $ 4,775 SUBTOTAL 77 69 38 37 38 150 348-5 555,690 5 3,240 $ 20,890 $ 79,520 Tetal Inbar $ 79,520 Trial Diced Coda $ 2,775 Total I$jMPo $ 52,595 lieu benable Expenses Admin. MND 5 Public Review Draft MND 25 hard copies at 575 each + 1 original + 1 c8gltd S 1,950 25 compact &k copies at 510 each MND & APPENDIX $ 250 50 NOfr'NOA for Public Marring 5 75 ReiDanies to Comment Letters 1 original + 1 digital Final MN0 - 25 herd copies as 575 each + 1 original + 1 digital 5 100 Final MND 25 compact disk tapirs at 510 S 250 Mirage;' (Federal Rotel and Mirsc copies/postage $ 200 rubrication Orr SO Pubrids In Newppaper Fi3 and Game Fling Fees Applicant to Provide • TOTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 5 2775 NOTES_ 1 j The budget far the Final MND is an estimate only, based on approximately 25 hours for preparation of Response to Comments plus some technical input from Urban Crossroads The estimated budget assumes that no additional baric research wit bo required to respond to aommenls, that rho comments will be directed at she substance and technical adequacy of the Mt4D, and that the coalmen% will be complied by the City and transmitted in welling to the consultant. Modifkatian to She scope of work, budget and lime frame may be necessary tf comments received from agencies or the 2) The reinbursahles budget it an estmase only El P I D Solutions, Inc Case Lorna Residenfsnf Projed - ?AND Proposal' 19 21 L IcaldjmlAgreements\EPD Solutions Environment Ag nt.EA 7.2Aloe .jn City of Redlands Development Setscrew Department EA -7.2 (1.29 19) EXHIBIT "C" WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION Every employer, except the State, shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways. (a) (b) CHECK ONE By being insured against liability to pay compensation by one or more insurers duly authorized to write compensation msurance m this State By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations, a certificate of consent to self -insure, either as an mdividual employer, or as one employer in a group of employers, which may be given upon furmshmg proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self -insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his or her employees I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every ployer to be msured against liability for Workers' Compensation or to undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement (Labor Code §1861) I affirm that at all times, in performmg the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement, I shall not employ any person m any manner such that I become subject to the workers' compensation laws of Califorma. However, at any time, if I employ any person such that I become subject to the workers' compensation laws of Cahforma, immediately I shall provide the City with a certificate of consent to self insure, or a certification of workers' compensation insurance I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information and representations made m this certificate are true and correct. EPD Solutio . J u c ' Date. es4/ r./7 By. Jerem;' +ut, Pr- : dent 22 L:1ca\dim\Agreemeats\EPD Solutions Environment Agmt.EA 7.2.doc jn