Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_242-2006_CCv0001.pdf ASSIGNMENT, ASSUMPTION AND RELEASE AGREEMENT This Assignment, Assumption and Release Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into as of November 1, 2006 the "Effective Date") among the following persons/entities (collectively referred to as the "Parties" or individually as a "Party"): Frank J. Mistretta and Margaret O. Mistretta, individually ("Frank and Margaret"), Frank J. Mistretta and Margaret O. Mistretta as Trustees of the Frank J. Mistretta Family Trust, established February 1, 1983 ("Mistretta Trust") and Mistretta Family Properties, a California general partnership ("MFP") (collectively, the "Mistretta Parties") on the one hand, and Chad Covington, individually ("Covington"), CC&D, Inc., a California corporation (sometimes referred to as Covington Construction and Development) ("CC&D") and Silverleaf Development, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Silverleaf") (collectively, the "*CC&D Parties") on the other hand, with reference to the following facts: RECITALS A. Mistretta Trust and MFP, as "Seller", entered into that certain Sale and Purchase Agreement/Escrow Instructions dated April 8, 2002, with CC&D, as "Buyer" (as amended by numerous supplemental escrow instructions and amendments to date, the "Purchase Agreement"), with respect to that certain real property consisting of approximately 183 acres and 274 shares of water stock located in the City of Redlands, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as more fully described in the Purchase Agreement (the "Property"). B. On May 20, 2005, an action was commenced by Redlands Residents for Rural Living, an unincorporated association ("RRRL") against the City of Redlands and the City Council of the City of Redlands (collectively, "Redlands"), Chad Covington, Covington Construction and Development and Mistretta Trust as Case No. SCVSS 126460 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Bernardino, seeking a Petition for Writ of Mandate under the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq. ("CEQA") and the California Government Code, relating to an 84-lot residential development proposed by CC&D/Silverleaf for the Property. C. Attorneys for RRRL have negotiated a proposed a settlement of the Action with attorneys for CC&D and the Mistretta Trust (the "Proposed Settlement"), which Proposed Settlement includes., among other things, an agreement by RRRL and Redlands as to the validity of certain entitlements with respect to the Property. D. CC&D/Silverleaf no longer has an interest in the Property or the Project and no longer desires to continue in the Action. However, Mistretta Trust desires to obtain the entitlement approvals set forth in the Proposed Settlement and to obtain an assignment from CC&D/Silverleaf of all its right, title and interest in and to all existing and future entitlements relating to development of the Property. E. CC&D/Silverleaf is willing to assign its right, title and interest in and to all such entitlements provided the Mistretta Parties assume all of CC&D/Silverleaf s obligations relating thereto and with respect to or arising out of the Action, on the terms set forth hereinbelow. 11/1-106 8036,15 11&0 434892 v5 AGREEMENT NOW,THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration and in consideration for the releases set forth below, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Assignment. The CC&D Parties, and each of them, hereby assign, transfer and convey to Mistretta Trust all of the right, title and interest of the CC&D Parties, and each of them, in and to the following: (a) all applications, permits, authorizations, consents, orders, certificates, licenses, general and specific plans, maps, environmental impact reports, certifications, approvals, registrations, qualifications and other entitlements accepted, granted, issued or enacted by any of governmental and quasi-governmental bodies and agencies having jurisdiction pertaining or relating to the Property (collectively,the "Entitlements"); and (b) all rights and benefits, if any, and all claims, if any, against RRRL, Redlands or other third parties (other than Parties to this Agreement)that arise from, under, as a result of, or relate in any way to the Action, including, without limitation, any settlement thereof(the"Legal Rights"). 2. Assumption. The Mistretta Parties, and each of them, hereby assumes all of the obligations of the CC&D Parties, and each of them, now existing or hereafter accruing, that arise from, under, as a result of, or relate in any way to the Entitlements, the Legal Rights or the Action (including, without limitation, any settlement thereof), regardless of whether such obligations accrue or relate to time periods prior to or after the Effective Date. The foregoing assumption shall not apply to amounts, if any, owed by any of the CC&D Parties to third party contractors. consultants, professionals or attorneys (including, without limitation, the law firm of Downey Brand) for work performed for any of the CC&D Parties prior to the Effective Date. 3. Hold Harmless. Each of the Mistretta Parties hereby agrees to indemnify, protect, defend and hold the CC&D Parties, and each of them, and each of their constituents, affiliates, agents and consultants harmless from and against any and all losses, claims, costs, fees (including, without limitation, attorneys* fees), liabilities, damages and expenses arising from the Mistretta Parties' failure to discharge any of the CC&D Parties' obligations assumed by the Mistretta Parties pursuant to Section 2 of this Agreement, except to the extent arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of the CC&D Parties. 4. Releases by Parties: (a) Mistretta Parties' Release: Except as to such rights or claims as may be created by this Agreement, which rights are expressly reserved, each of the Mistretta Parties hereby covenants not to sue, acknowledges full and complete satisfaction of, and hereby releases, remises, and forever discharges the CC&D Parties, and each of them, including their agents, servants. representatives, administrators, affiliates, constituents, assigns, partners, general partners, managing partners, limited partners, members, heirs, successors in interest, attorneys-in-fact and attorneys (the ­CC&D Released Parties"), of and from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, obligations, agreements, liens, judgments, orders, damages, 11/2 4)6 8036 15 HSC) X6489210 liabilities, losses, costs and expenses of any kind, in law or in equity, that any of the Mistretta Parties now holds, has ever held or may in the future hold against the CC&D Released Parties, or any of them, concerning the Purchase Agreement, the Property, the Action, the Entitlements and the Legal Rights. (b) CC&D Parties' Release: Except as to such rights or claims as may be created by this Agreement, each of the CC&D Parties hereby covenants not to sue, acknowledges full and complete satisfaction of, and hereby releases, remises, and forever discharges the Mistretta Parties, and each of them, including their agents, servants, representatives, administrators, affiliates, constituents, assigns, partners, general partners, managing partners, limited partners, members, heirs, successors in interest, attorneys-in-fact and attorneys (the "Mistretta Released Parties"), of and from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, obligations, agreements, liens,judgments, orders, damages, liabilities, losses, costs and expenses of any kind, in law or in equity, that any of the CC&D Parties holds, has ever held or may in the future hold against the Mistretta Released Parties, or any of them, concerning the Purchase Agreement, the Property, the Action, the Entitlements and the Legal Rights. 5. Authority. The Parties represent that they have the full and complete authority to enter into this Agreement and that they are aware of no other individual or entity claiming an interest in any of the released claims. 6. Waiver of California Civil Code Section 1542. In consideration of the foregoing, the Parties specifically waive the benefit of the provisions of Section 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California, which provides as follows: "A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his settlement with the debtor." Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 1542, each of the Parties expressly acknowledges that this Agreement is also intended to include in its effect, without limitation, claims against other Parties of which the releasing party may not know or expect to exist at the time of the execution hereof, and that this Agreement contemplates the extinguishment of such claims. 7. Confidentiality. The Parties agree to keep the terms of this settlement confidential and further agree that the terms of this Agreement shall not be disclosed to any third parties except as necessary to obtain legal or tax advice or pursuant to a subpoena issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. 8. Representations and Warranties: Each of the Parties represents, warrants, and agrees as follows: (a) It has received independent legal advice from legal counsel with respect to the advisability of making the settlement provided for herein, or has voluntarily chosen not to seek the same, with respect to the advisability of executing this Agreement, and with respect to the releases. waivers, and all other matters contained herein, and 11"2/06 803b 15 H&O 434492 0 3 acknowledges that it has executed this Agreement without fraud, duress, or undue influence. (b) Neither it, nor any agent, employee, representative, or attorney of such Party, has made any statement, representation, or promise to any other Party regarding any facts relied upon in entering into this Agreement, and it does not rely upon any statement, representation or promise of any other Party, or of any agent, employee, representative, or attorney for such other Party, in executing this Agreement, or in making the settlement provided for herein, except as expressly stated in this Agreement. (c) It has read this Agreement and understands the contents hereof. (d) It has not heretofore assigned, transferred, or granted, or purported to assign, transfer, or grant, any of the claims, demands, causes of action, obligations, agreements, liens,judgments, orders, damages, liabilities, losses, costs and expenses of any kind, in law or in equity that any Party now holds, will ever hold, or has ever held against any other Party. (e) It will execute all such further and additional documents as shall be reasonable, convenient, necessary, or desirable to carry out the provisions of this Agreement. 9. Costs and Attorneys' Fees. Each Party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees with respect to the preparation and execution of this Agreement and any other documentation necessary to effectuate this Agreement. 10. No Admission. Each Party has entered into this Agreement in order to compromise the matters released herein, and nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed an admission by any of the Parties as to any liabilities or obligations with respect to such matters. 11. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto, their respective predecessors and successors, agents, servants, employees, representatives, administrators, affiliates, constituents, partners, general partners, managing partners, limited partners, members, assigns, heirs, adjustors, and insurers. 12. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes a single, integrated written contract expressing the entire agreement of the Parties. There is no other agreement, written or oral, express or implied, between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement may be modified only in a writing signed by all Parties. 13. Severability.' The Agreement shall be considered severable, Such that if any provision or part of the Agreement is ever held invalid under any law or ruling, that provision or part of the Agreement shall remain in force and effect to the extent allowed by law, and all other provisions or parts shall remain in full force and effect. 14. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple Counterpart facsimile signature pages, each of which shall be deemed an original, and all of which taken together shall constitute one Agreement. tl� f 1/-2/06 803 6 15 H&O,#34892 v5 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed and effective as of the date first written above. Frank J. Mistretta Margaret O. Mistretta FRANK J. MISTRETTA TRUST, Established February 1, 1983 By: Name: Frank J. Mistretta Its: Trustee By: Name: Margaret O. Mistretta Its: Trustee MISTRETTA FAMILY PROPERTIES By: Name: Its: SILVERLEAF DEVELOPMENT, LLC By: Redlands 183, LLC, a California limited liability company, its Managing Member By: American Investment Partnership, Inc. a Nevada corporation, Managing Member By: Louis Habash, President CC&D, INC. By: Chad Covington, President Chad Covington 1112/06 8036 15 H 434892 v5 5 I DOWNEY BRAND LLP PATRICK G. MITCHELL (BAR NO. 124420) MICHAEL N. MILLS (BAR NO. 191762) THOMAS A. HENRY (BAR NO. 199707) 3 555 Capitol Mall, Tenth Floor Sacramento, CA 95814-4686 4 Telephone: (916) 444-1000 Facsimile: (916) 444-2100 5 Attorneys for Real Parties in Interest 6 CHAD COVINGTON; COVINGTON CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT; AND FRANK J. MISTRETTA, 7 TRUSTEE, and MARGARET MISTRETTA, TRUSTEE, of the FRANK J. MISTRETTA FAMILY TRUST, established 8 February 1, 1983 9 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA I I COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 12 13 REDLANDS RESIDENTS FOR RURAL CASE NO. SCVSS 126460 LIVING, an unincorporated association, 14 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH 15 PREJUDICE OF REAL PARTIES IN V. INTEREST, CHAD COVINGTON AND 16 COVINGTON CONSTRUCTION AND CITY OF REDLANDS, a municipal DEVELOPMENT 17 corporation, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS, 18 Respondents. 19 CHAD COVINGTON, COVINGTON Assigned For All Purposes To: 20 CONSTRUCTION AND Hon. John P. Wade DEVELOPMENT, FRANK J. Dept: S-8 21 MISTRETTA, and DOES I THROUGH 25, inclusive, 22 Real Parties in Interest 23 24 25 WHEREAS, Real Parties in Interest. CHAD COVINGTON and COVINGTON -26 CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT (the "Covington Parties") have entered into an 27 Assignment, Assumption and Release Agreement (the "Agreement") with Real Parties in Interest 28 FRANK J. MISTRETTA, TRUSTEE. and MARGARET MISTRETTA, TRUSTEE, of the I STIR A ATIO-N AND[PROPOSI,D]ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF COVINGTON PARI IES WITH PREJUDICE I FRANK J. MISTRETTA FAMILY TRUST, established February 1, 1983 (the "Mistretta Parties"),to transfer all of the Covington Parties'right, title and interest in the subject Property to the Mistretta Parties, as well as all obligations arising by virtue of the Covington Parties' station 4 as Real Parties in Interest in this action; and, 5 WHEREAS, the Covington Parties no longer have any interest in the subject matter of this 6 litigation, as of November 1, 2006, the effective date of the Agreement; 7 NOW, THEREFORE, in light of the foregoing recitals, all parties to this action hereby 8 stipulate, by and through their attorneys of record, that, subject to the approval of this Court, the 9 Covington Parties are no longer indispensable parties to this action and may now be dismissed 10 with prejudice from this action. I I IT IS SO STIPULATED AND RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED. 12 13 DATED: November 2006 Respectfully submitted, 14 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 15 16 By: MICHAEL N. MILLS 17 Attorneys for Real Parties in Interest CHAD COVINGTON; COVINGTON 18 CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT; AND FRANK J. MISTRETTA, TRUSTEE, and 19 MARGARET MISTRETTA, TRUSTEE of the FRANK J. MISTRETTA FAMILY TRUST, 0 established February 1, 1983 2 21 22 23 24 25 '6 27 28 STIPUTATIONNAND 1PROPOSED1 ORDER 0HASIMISSAL OF'COVIINGTON PARTIES W11-FI PREJUDICE rt 2 DATED: November 2006 Respectfully submitted, i 4 By: 5 DANIEL J. McHUGH City Attorney 6 For Respondents CITY OF REDLANDS and the CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS 7 8 DATED: November 2006 Respectfully submitted, 9 LEIBOLD McCLENDON & MANN, P.C. 10 I I By: JOHN G. McCLENDON 12 Attorneys for Petitioner REDLANDS RESIDENTS FOR RURAL LIVING 13 14 15 [PROPOSED] ORDER 16 Based on the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 17 ORDERED that: 18 Real Parties in Interest CHAD COVINGTON and COVINGTON CONSTRUCTION 19 AND DEVELOPMENT are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from the within action, 20 Redlands Residentsfar Rural Living v. Cit y of'Redlands, et al., Case No. SCVSS 126460. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 21 DATED: 2006 24 25 HONORABLE JOHN P. WADE Judge of the Superior Court M 26 31017 4 1 17 -)8 3 STIPULATIO-NAND[PROPOSFDI ORDFR OF DISMISSAL OF COVINGTON PARTIFS W1 III PRf-JUDICE I DOWNEY BRAND LLP PATRICK G. miTcHFI-1 (BAR NO. 124420) MICHAEL N. MILLS (BAR NO. 191762) THOMAS A. HENRY (BAR NO. 199707) 3 555 Capitol Mall, Tenth Floor Sacramento, CA 95814-4686 4 Telephone: (916) 444-1000 Facsimile: (916) 444-2100 Attorneys for Real Parties in Interest 6 FRANK J. MISTRETTA, TRUSTEE, and MARGARET MISTRETTA, TRUSTEE, of the FRANK J. MISTRETTA 7 FAMILY TRUST, established February 1, 1983 8 9 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 11 REDLANDS RESIDENTS FOR RURAL. CASE NO. SCVSS 126460 12 LIVING, an unincorporated association, , STIPULATED JUDGMENT BY AND 13 Petitioner, AMONG PETITIONER, RESPONDENTS 14 V. AND REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST 15 CITY OF REDLANDS, a municipal corporation, CITY COUNCIL OF THE 16 CITY OF REDLANDS,., 17 Respondents. 18 CHAD COVINGTON, COVINGTON Action Filed: May 20, 2005 CONSTRUCTION AND I Assigned For All Purposes To: Z-1 19 DEVELOPMENT, FRANK J. HONORABLE JOHN P. WADE MISTRETTA. and DOES I THROUGH Department S-8 -)o 25, inclusive, 21 Real Parties in Interest 22 23 This Stipulated Judgment is entered into by and among Petitioner. Redlands Residents for 24 Rural Living ("Petitioner"); Respondents, City of Redlands and the City Council of the City of 25 Redlands (collectively. "Redlands"), and Real Parties in Interest Frank J. Mistretta, Trustee. and 26 'Margaret Mistretta, Trustee of the Frank J. Mistretta Family Trust. established February 1, 1983 27 (collectively, "Real Par-ties"). Petitioner. Redlands and the Real Parties are collectively referred 28 to as the "Parties" or individually as a "Party." STIPULA TED Jt 11)(AtEN-1- RECITALS A. On May 20, 2005, Petitioner filed this lawsuit in this Court, where it is now pending (the "Action"), against Redlands. Petitioner also named Chad Covington, Covington 4 Construction and Development, and Frank J. Mistretta, Trustee, and Margaret Mistretta, Trustee 5 of the Frank J. Mistretta Family Trust, established February 1, 1983 as real parties in interest. 6 The Action is a Petition for Writ of Mandate under the California Environmental Quality Act, 7 Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq. ("CEQA") and the California Government Code 8 challenging Redlands'approval of a 84-lot residential development in the City of Redlands, 9 proposed by Covington Construction and Development on real property now owned by the Frank 10 J. Mistretta Family Trust, established February 1, 1983. Specifically, the Action challenged 11 Redlands' certification of an environmental impact report ("EIR") for the residential development, 12 Zone Change No. 390, General Plan Amendment No. 2005-02, Conditional Use Permit No. 780, 13 and Tentative Tract Map No. 16361 (collectively, the "Project"). 14 B. Chad Covington and Covington Construction and Development assigned all of 15 their rights, title, interests and obligations in this Action, as well as the proposed residential 16 development described above in Paragraph A. by way of an Assignment, Assumption and Release 17 1 Agreement, dated November 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"). As a result of this Agreement, the 18 Parties previously have filed herewith a Stipulation and Proposed Order of Dismissal with 19 Prejudice of real parties in interest Chad Covington and Covington Construction and 20 Development from this Action. 21 C. After arms-length negotiations, Petitioner, Redlands, and Real Parties have 22 reached and entered into a settlement agreement by way of this Stipulated Judgment in a good 23 faith effort to avoid the uncertainty and expense of protracted litigation. The Parties respectively 24 believe it is in their best interests to settle this case. 25 TERMS 26 THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate as follows: 27 1. Jurisdiction 28 This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over the Parties for 2 STI PU LATED J U D6 M ENT I purposes of this Stipulated Judgment. No Admission of Liability 3 Redlands and Real Parties expressly deny any fault or liability for any and all claims made 4 in the Action. The Parties expressly acknowledge that this Stipulated Judgment is the 5 compromise of disputed claims and that there was no adjudication on the merits of any claim. 6 3. Disposition of Claims 7 A. This Stipulated Judgment shall be presented to the Court for entry as a judgment 8 pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. 9 B. The EIR for the Project is legally adequate in all respects and its certification by 10 Redlands is hereby deemed valid under CEQA. 11 C. Redlands' Findings and Statement of Overriding Consideration, adopted pursuant 12 to CEQA, for approval of the Project are legally adequate in all respects and their approval is 13 deemed valid under CEQA. 14 D. The following entitlements previously granted by Redlands in connection with the 15 Project's approval are hereby deemed valid and legally permissible under the California 16 Government Code and all other applicable law: (1) General Plan Amendment No. 2005-02, to 17 change a portion of Highview Lane from a-Local Street"to a-Rural Collector Street;"(2) the 18 Agriculture Preserve Removal Application for approximately nine acres of land; (3) Tentative 19 Tract Map No. 16361; and (4) Conditional Use Permit No. 780. 20 E. Real Parties andlor their assigns agree to limit the Project to a Planned Residential 21 Development("PRD") as described below under the City of Redlands' Municipal Code and, in 22 consideration of the covenants and payments by Real Parties under this Stipulated Judgment, 23 Petitioner agrees to allow, and not file or make further objection to, the application, development 24 and construction of the Project by the Real Parties or their assigns in conformance to the PRD or 25 any governmental approvals of such process. The PRD will consist of a "clustered" residential 26 development not exceeding 36 residential lots/units (hereinafter, the "General Plan Alternative"), 27 the goals of which will be to preserve open space and minimize grading for the planned units. 28 Each residential lot/unit may be permitted to have a second residential unit as allowed under STI FU LATE DJUDGIMENT I sections 65852.1 and 65852.2 of the Government Code and Redlands' municipal code. The General Plan Alternative is one of the alternatives analyzed in the EIR and is identified as the 3 "General Plan Alternative" in Section 7.4 of the EIR. The EIR identified the General Plan 4 Alternative as the "environmentally superior alternative" as part of the CEQA review process for 5 the Project. The General Plan Alternative is consistent with the City of Redlands' General Plan. 6 F. In order to proceed with the development of the General Plan Alternative, the 7 Parties agree that Real Parties shall amend the existing Tentative Tract Map No. 16361 and the 8 amended map will retain the original no. 16361, or shall submit another tentative tract map that 9 conforms to the provisions of Paragraph 3.E. above. The Parties further agree that Conditional 10 Use Permit No. 780 may be revised accordingly, or another conditional use permit may be 11 submitted, to permit the development of the General Plan Alternative. 12 G. Pursuant to the authority of Public Resources Code section 21166 and section 13 15162 of title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Parties agree that no further 14 environmental review will be required for the Project or for the development of the General Plan 15 Alternative under CEQA as part of this Stipulated Judgment because the EIR has already studied 16 and evaluated the General Plan Alternative and there are no substantial changes proposed in the 17 General Plan Alternative that will require revisions of the previous EIR. There are no new 18 significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified 19 significant effects resulting from the General Plan Alternative. As a result, all previously 20 considered mitigation measures, and the analysis of such measures in the Project's FIR, remain 21 equally applicable to the General Plan Alternative. 22 4. Attorneys' Fees 23 Real Parties Frank J. Mistretta, Trustee, and Margaret Mistretta, Trustee of the Frank J. 24 Mistretta Family Trust, established February 1, 1.983 shall pay to Petitioner the amount of 25 $48,782.60 for Petitioner's reasonable attorneys' fees and costs associated with Petitioner's 16 prosecution of this action (the "Payment"). No Party other than Frank J. Mistretta, Trustee, and 27 Margaret Mistretta. Trustee of the Frank J. Mistretta Family Trust, established February 1, 19831 28 shall be responsible for making the Payment to Petitioner. The Payment shall be made payable to 4 STIPULA FEDJUDGMEN4 I the Client 'Trust Account of counsel of record for Real Parties, Downey Brand LL.P. and 2 "escrowed" therein for Petitioner's benefit pending entry of this Stipulated Judgment. The 3 Payment's deposit into the Downey Brand LLP Client Trust Account shall be an express 4 condition precedent to the filing of this fully-executed Stipulated Judgment with the Court, and 5 1 Downey Brand LLP shall notify Petitioner's counsel of record, Leibold, McClendon & Mann, 6 P.C., when such deposit occurs. Not later than 15 days after final Court approval and service of 7 notice of entry of this Stipulated Judgment pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 8 664.5, Downey Brand LLP, shall disburse the Payment to Petitioner by check made payable to 9 "Leibold, McClendon & Mann Client Trust Account." In no event shall Downey Brand LLP be 10 responsible for making the Payment to Petitioner unless and until it receives the Payment funds I I from Frank J. Mistretta, Trustee, and Margaret Mistretta, Trustee of the Frank J. Mistretta Family 12 Trust, established February 1, 1983. 13 5. Reservation of Rights 14 Except as expressly provided in this Stipulated Judgment, nothing in this Stipulated 15 Judgment is intended or shall be construed to preclude Redlands from exercising its discretion or 16 authority under any law, statute, ordinance, or regulation. 17 6. Release by Petitioner of Redlands and Real Parties 18 Upon the effective date of this Stipulated Judgment, Petitioner, including its members (a 19 list Petitioner's members is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this -)0 reference), its successors, assigns, officers, directors, attorneys, employees and agents shall and 21 do hereby release and discharge and covenant not to sue Redlands and Real Parties, as well as 22 their predecessors, successors, assigns, affiliates, officers, directors, shareholders, attorneys, 23 employees and agents for any and all claims, liabilities, or causes of action of every kind and 24 nature whatsoever, in law and in equity, whether known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, 25 foreseen or unforeseen, which arise out of or are related to the Action. Such release will not 216 apply to the enforcement of the terms of this Stipulated Judgment. In furtherance of this 27 intention, the Petitioner and its members acknowledge that they are familiar with Section 1542 of 28 the Civil Code of the State of California, which provides as follows: 5 STIPLIA FFD J I I DGMEN T A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor. 3 4 Petitioners and its members waive and relinquish any right or benefit that they have or 5 may have under Section 1542 of the California Civil Code to the full extent that they may 6 lawfully waive all rights and benefits pertaining to the subject matter of this Stipulated Judgment. 7 7. Release by Redlands and Real Parties of Petitioner 8 Upon the effective date of this Stipulated Judgment, both Redlands and Real Parties, and 9 their respective predecessors, successors, assigns, affiliates, officers, directors, shareholders, 10 attorneys, employees and agents shall and do hereby release and discharge and covenant not to 11 sue Petitioner, including its members (a list Petitioner's members is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" 12 and incorporated herein by this reference), and its successors, assigns, officers, directors, 13 attorneys, employees and agents for any and all claims, liabilities, or causes of action of every 14 kind and nature whatsoever, in law and in equity, whether known or unknown, suspected or 15 unsuspected, foreseen or unforeseen, which arise out of or are related to the Action. Such release 16 will not apply to the enforcement of the terms of this Stipulated Judgment. In furtherance of this 17 intention, the Redlands and Real Parties acknowledge that they are familiar with Section 1542 of 18 the Civil Code of the State of California, which provides as follows: 19 A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of 20 executing the release, which if known by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor. 21 22 Redlands and Real Parties waive and relinquish any right or benefit that they have or may 23 have under Section 1542 of the California Civil Code to the full extent that they may lawfully 24 waive all rights and benefits pertaining to the subject matter of this Stipulated Judgment. 2)5 8. Integration 26 This Stipulated Judgment contains all of the terms and conditions agreed upon by the 27 Par-ties relating to the matters covered by this Stipulated Judgment, and supersedes any and all 28 prior and contemporaneous agreements, negotiations, correspondence, understandings. and 6 STIPULATED JUDGMENT I communications of the Parties, whether oral or written, respecting the matters covered by this 2 Stipulated Judgment. This Stipulated Judgment may be amended or modified only by a writing 3 signed by the Parties or their authorized representatives, and then by order of the Court. 4 9. Knowing, Voluntary Agreement 5 Each Party acknowledges that it has been represented by legal counsel, and that each party 6 has reviewed, and has had the benefit of legal counsel's advice concerning, all of the terms and 7 conditions of this Stipulated Judgment. 8 10. Jurisdiction, Interpretation 9 This Court shall retain jurisdiction for the sole purpose of insuring compliance with this 10 Stipulated Judgment. This Stipulated Judgment shall be deemed to have been drafted equally by I I the Parties, and shall not be interpreted for or against any Party on the ground that any such Party 12 drafted it. This Stipulated Judgment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the 13 laws of the State of California. 14 11. Authority to Execute 15 Each Party represents and warrants that the person who has signed this Stipulated 16 Judgment on its behalf is duly authorized to enter into this Stipulated Judgment, and to bind that 17 Party to the terms and conditions of this Stipulated Judgment. 18 12. Counterparts 19 This Stipulated Judgment may be executed by the Settling Parties in counterpart originals 20 with the same force and effect as if fully and simultaneously executed as a single, original 21 document. 22 13. 'Waiver of Appeal Right-, Reservation of Right to Appeal Collateral Orders 21 The Parties agree to waive their right to appeal from this Stipulated Judgment. Nothing in 24 this Stipulated Judgment shall be construed as a waiver of any Party's right to appeal from an 15 order that arises from an action to enforce the terms of this Stipulated Judgment. 226 14. Effective Date 27 The effective date of this Stipulated Judgment shall be the date that the Judge of the 28 Superior Court approves and enters this Stipulated Judgment. 7 STIPUI ATED JUDGMENT 15, No Third Party Benefits This Stipulated Judgment is made for the sole benefit of the Parties. No other person or 3 entity shall have any rights or remedies under or by reason of this Stipulated Judgment, unless 4 otherwise expressly provided for herein. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 6 7 DATED: November 2006 REDLANDS RESIDENTS FOR RURAL LIVING 8 NAME- 10 Its: 11 DATED: November—— CITY OF REDLANDS AND CITY COUNCIL OF 12 THE CITY OF REDLANDS 13 14 By: NAME: jon"Harrison 15 Title: Mayor � _���- t 0�C Redlands DATED: November 2006 FRA FAMILY City R� — NK J. MISTRETTA FAMILYTRUST, 16 established February 1, 1983 17 18 By: FRANK J. MISTRETTA 19 DATED: November 2006 Trustee — FRANK J. MISTRETTA FAMILY TRUST, 20 established February 1, 1983 21 22 By: MARGARET MISTRETTA 23 Trustee 24 25 26 27 -)8 8 STINJI-ATFID JUDGMENT I APPROVED AS TO FORM: 2 DATED: November 2006 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 3 4 5 MICHAEL N. MILLS Attorneys for Real Parties in Interest 6 CHAD COVINGTON; COVINGTON CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT; 7 AND FRANK J. MISTRETTA, TRUSTEE, and MARGARET MISTRETTA, TRUSTEE of the 8 FRANK J. MISTRETTA FAMILY TRUST, established February 1, 1983 9 10 DATED: November , 2006 12 DA , EL J- McHUGH 13 ity Attorney For Respondents CITY OF REDLANDS and the 14 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS 15 DATED: November 2006 LEIBOLD, McCLENDON & MANN, P.C. cH EL ky�Att e 16 17 18 By: JOH !Gb. �IeCLENDON 19 Attorneys Xor Petitioner REDLANDS RESIDENTS FOR RURAL LIVING 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 DATED: 2006 24 25 HON. JOHN P. WADE 26 JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 27 7�42if)3 28 9 STIPULATED JUDGMENT I DATED: . 2006 3 HON. JO `,N P. WADE JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 4 5 793251>3 6/20/06 6 91160.13 11/7/06 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 14 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10