Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_151-2005_CCv0001.pdf Execution Copy I Memorandum of Understanding 2 Relating to the Service Review by LAFCO 3 of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District 4 5 6 This Memorandum of Understanding Relating to the Service Review by LAFCO 7 of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District ("MOU") is entered into and 8 effective this 2nd day of August, 2005 by and between the City of Redlands 9 ("Redlands") and the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District ("Valley 10 District"). Redlands and Valley District are each referred to as a"Party" and are 11 collectively referred to as the "Parties." 12 13 Recitals 14 15 A. Redlands relies upon the extraction of groundwater from the Bunker Hill 16 Basin for approximately 50% of the water it serves to its residents, which percentage is 17 expected to increase in the future; 18 19 B. Valley District is required by the terms of the judgment in Western 20 Municipal Water District v. East San Bernardino County Water District(Riverside 21 County Superior Court No. 78426) to maintain the safe yield of the Bunker Hill Basin for 22 the benefit of all Non-Plaintiff parties under the judgment, including Redlands; 23 24 C. Because of their respective interests in the Bunker Hill Basin, the Parties 25 wish to ensure the most effective and efficient management of that basin; 26 27 D. The San Bernardino County Local Agency Formation Commission 28 ("LAFCO"), as required by Government Code section 56430, is engaged in reviewing 29 the services provided by the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District 30 ("Conservation District") and is considerip-whether a change in organization of the MMU Regarding Service Review August 2005 692449 Page 1 of 6 Execution Copy 31 Conservation District would serve the public interest in the efficient and effective 32 provision of governmental services. 33 34 E. The Parties believe that the water spreading activities at the Conservation 35 District spreading grounds are important to maintaining groundwater supplies in the 36 Bunker Hill Basin; 37 38 F. The Parties further believe that Valley District can provide the 39 groundwater recharge function of the Conservation District in a manner that eliminates 10 the groundwater charge and so will save the,:,-s;.dents of the San Bernardino Valley 41 approximately $600,000 in fiscal year 2005/06; 42 43 G. The Parties additionally believe that the consolidation of the Conservation 44 District into Valley District will allow for the more effective management of the Bunker 45 Hill Basin under the auspices of the Seven Oaks Accord, of which the Conservation 46 District is not a party; 47 48 H. On July 19, 2005, the City Council of Redlands voted to direct staff to 49 enter into negotiations with Valley District that are intended to reach agreement on the 50 terms and conditions under which Redlands' interests in Bunker Hill Basin as a large part 51 of its water supply could be assured if LAFCO independently determines that the 52 Conservation District should be consolidated into Valley District; 53 54 1. On July 20, 2005, the Board of Directors of Valley District, in response to 55 LAFCO's request, considered taking a position with regard to consolidating the 56 Conservation District into San Bernardino County Flood Control District, consolidating 57 into Valley District, expanding Conservation District's sphere of influence to cover the 58 entire Bunker Hill Basin, or suggesting no change. During consideration of this item, 59 Valley District Board Members requested additional information, including the terms and 60 conditions under which Redlands would agree that its water supply interest in the Bunker NIOU Regarding Service Review August 2005 692449 3 Page 2 of 6 Execution Copy 61 Hill Basin would be protected if LAFCO determines that the Conservation District should 62 be consolidated into Valley District; and 63 64 J. The Parties recognize and acknowledge that LAFCO has the sole and 65 exclusive authority to consider and implement changes in the organization of special 66 districts. The purpose of this MOU is to better implement any decision that may be made 67 by LAFCO in connection with its review of the services provided by the Conservation 68 District. 69 -70 Understandings 71 72 1. LAFCO Authority. The Parties hereby acknowledge that LAFCO has sole and 73 exclusive authority over the terms and conditions of any change in the 74 organization of special districts in San Bernardino County and that nothing in this 75 MOU shall be construed so as to interfere in any way with the full and free 76 exercise of that authority by LAFCO. It is the intent of the Parties that the terms 77 of this MOU and the future agreement described in paragraph 4 below be 78 construed so as to best implement any decision that LAFCO may make regarding 79 the potential change in organization of the Conservation District. In the event that 80 any provision of this MOU or the future agreement described in paragraph 4 81 below interferes with the implementation of LAFCO's decision on the services to 82 be provided by the Conservation District, that provision shall be stricken and the 83 Parties shall agree on a substitute provision that is as close as possible to the 84 stricken provision but that is consistent with LAFCO's decision on the services to 85 be provided by the Conservation District. 86 87 2. Recommendation to LAFCO. Within five days of the effective date of this MOU, 88 the Parties shall send a joint letter to LAFCO recommending that, if LAFCO 89 determines the consolidation or other change in organization of the Conservation 90 District to be in the public interest, LAFCO consider including the following I MOU Regarding Service Review August 2005 Z� 592449,3 rage 3 of 6 Execution Copy 91 terms and conditions as part of any such consolidation or other change in 92 organization: 93 94 a. Employment Security for Conservation District Employees. All 95 employees of the Conservation District as of July 1, 2005 will be offered 96 employment at Redlands or Valley District as may be directed by LAFCO. 97 98 b. Abolition of Groundwater Assessment. The groundwater assessment 99 currently levied by the Conservation District will be abolished as part of 100 any change in organization. Valley District may not propose an.-election 101 to approve the levy of another tax, assessment, or fee/charge without the 102 consent of a majority of the members of the basin management committee 103 described below and other producers in the San Bernardino Basin Area, 104 which producers would be identified by LAFCO as part of any decision. 105 106 C. Basin Management Account. Valley District shall place all revenues 107 (other than the groundwater assessment) currently being received by the 108 Conservation District into a segregated account ("Basin Management 109 Account") that will only be used to fund recharge efforts and other basin- 110 related operations, including but not limited to staff costs and III administrative expenses. The Basin Management Account shall be 112 supervised in a manner consistent with the terms of the Seven Oaks 113 Accord by a committee composed of Redlands, Valley District, Bear 114 Valley Mutual Water Company, East Valley Water District, the City of 115 San Bernardino Municipal Water Department, the City of Riverside Public 116 Utilities Department, Western Municipal Water District of Riverside 117 County and any other producer from the San Bernardino Basin Area that 118 LAFCO deems to be appropriate. Valley District shall provide an annual 119 report on the fund's operations to the parties to the Seven Oaks Accord 120 and to all other water purveyors in the San Bernardino Basin Area. MMU Regarding Service Review August 2005 Page 4 of 6 o924493 Execution Copy 121 122 d. Implementation of Plan B. The Parties shall work cooperatively towards 123 the expeditious completion of the environmental document for the Santa 124 Ana River Wash Plan ("Plan B") and the subsequent implementation of 125 Plan B. Nothing in this MOU shall prevent the Parties from amending 126 Plan B in cooperation with other Plan B member agencies to be consistent 127 with the Seven Oaks Accord or other efforts cooperatively to manage 128 water in the Bunker Hill Basin. Valley District shall serve as state lead 129 agency for the purpose of environmental review of Plan B. 130 131 e. Conveyance of Real Property to Redlands. The Mill Creek spreading 132 basins that were formerly owned by Redlands shall be conveyed back to 133 Redlands. This conveyance shall include the property originally held by 134 the East Lugonia Water Company. Redlands shall operate these facilities 135 in a manner that is consistent with the Seven Oaks Accord. The costs of 136 operating the Mill Creek spreading basis shall be covered by 137 disbursements from the Basin Management Account as described in an 138 annual operating budget pre-approved by Valley District. 139 140 f. Water Rights. The portion of the Conservation District's Water Right 141 Application No. 31370 that seeks the right to divert water from Mill Creek 142 shall be assigned to the Mill Creek Water Owners as part of the resolution 143 of Valley District's and Redlands' protests against that application. 144 145 3. Term. This MOU shall continue in effect until July 1, 2008 unless cancelled in 146 writing by both Parties prior to that date. 147 148 4. Future Agreement. In the event that LAFCO determines, in its sole and absolute 149 discretion, that the public interest would be served by a change of organization 150 that results in the consolidation or other change in organization of the MOU Regarding Service Review August 2005 Page 5 of 6 (,,)2441)3 Execution Copy 151 Conservation District, with Valley District serving as the successor agency to the 152 Conservation District in whole or in part, then the Parties will promptly take such 153 steps as may be necessary in good faith to enter in an agreement to implement 154 LAFCO's resolution making determinations and/or any other applicable orders, 155 resolutions or decisions. 156 157 CITY OF REDLANDS 158 159 160 By: 161 Susan'Pep�ler 162 Mayor 163 164 Attest: 165 166 By: 167 Corrie P, 'Ozer 168 City Clerk 169 170 171 SAN BE "'INO LL N ZPAL WATER DISTRICT 172 173 174 B 175 C. Patrick Milligan 176 President, Board of Directors MOLT Regarding Service Review August 2005 Page 6 of 6 6924443 AGENDA ITEM NO. C _ / COUNCIL MEETING OF 08/2/05 DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION SUBJECT: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING THE STATUS OF A PROPOSED AGREEMENT WITH THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT REGARDING A POSSIBLE CONSOLIDATION OF THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT MOTIONS: 1. Based upon the verbal and written evidence presented by City staff, I move to determine that the City's approval of the proposed Memorandum of Understanding with San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District recommending conditions to LAFCO in connection with the possible consolidation of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District is exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. 2. 1 move to approve the Memorandum of Understanding with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District recommending conditions to LAFCO in connection with the possible consolidation of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District, subject to possible non-substantive changes requested by the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District and approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, and authorize the Mayor to execute the Memorandum of Understanding. RECOMMENDATION: City staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed agreement. DISCUSSION: On July 19, 2005, the City Council authorized the Mayor, in behalf of the City, to execute a letter to LAFCO supporting the consolidation of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District (WCD) with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (MUNI). That letter has since been delivered to LAFCO in anticipation of LAFCO's August 17th Board Meeting at which the potential consolidation is scheduled to be discussed. In addition, also on July 19th, the City Council authorized Staff to enter into discussions with MUNI for the development of an agreement which would make recommendations to LAFCO for the inclusion of conditions of the potential LAFCO consolidation of the WCD with MUNI to protect the City's interests. At its meeting of July 01h. Staff hand delivered the letter from the Mayor to MUNI's Board of Directors which asked that Board to provide MUNI's staff with authorization to enter into Agreement with SBVMWD Regarding LAFCO Consolidation City Council Meeting of 08/02/05 Page 2 discussions with City Staff. At that July 20'h meeting, the MUNI Board discussed both the topic of a potential consolidation of the WCD with its District, and a possible agreement with the City which would recommend conditions to LAFCO. MUNI's Board took no action on the consolidation but did ask its staff to meet with Redlands' staff, and others, to begin discussions about an agreement and to gather additional information on the proposed consolidation which would be brought back to the Board. City and MUNI staff commenced their discussions on July 215t, and those discussions have culminated in the attached draft agreement being prepared for your consideration All of the conditions to protect the City's interests that were recommended by City staff and desired by the City Council are incorporated in the draft agreement. In summary, they are: I. Employment security for WCD employees. 2. Establishment of a Basin Management Account to be used exclusively to fund recharge efforts and other basin related operations. An annual accounting of the expenses will be provided to the City. 3. The Wash Plan(Plan B) will continue to be implemented. 4. Mill Creek recharge property will be conveyed to the City of Redlands. 5. Costs for operating the Mill Creek facilities will be covered by the Basin Management Account. In addition, a sixth condition has been recommended by staff for inclusion in the agreement which came as a request from the Bear Valley Mutual Water Company. That is, that LAFCO consider, as part of the possible consolidation, assigning that portion of the WCD's water rights application relating to Mill Creek to the Mill Creek Water Owners (the "Mill Creek Water Owners" is comprised of Redlands and the Crafton Water Company) Such an assignment is favored by City staff, and would protect the City's water rights to Mill Creek and would further the City Council's goal of amicably resolving the water rights disputes that are pending before the State Water Resources Control Board. City Staff believes that the proposed agreement, as drafted, fully protects the City's long-term interests in the water and habitat resources of Mill Creek and Santa Ana River. If Muni's Board approves the agreement as drafted, Staff will provide a copy of the agreement to the LAFCO Board on August 17`h when it is scheduled to consider the possible consolidation of the WCD. CEOA ANALYSIS: For the following reasons, City Staff recommends that the City Council's approval of the Agreement between the City and MUNI recommending to LAFCO conditions in connection with the possible consolidation of the WCD with MUNI is exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). First, City staff believes that the agreement does not constitute a project." Public Resources Code section 21065 defines a "project," for purposes of CEQA, as "an activity which may cause either a direct physical change 0J in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment . . . Further, the State's CEQA Guidelines, in section 15378, list several activities which do not fall Agreement with SBVMWI) Regarding LAFCO Consolidation City Council Meeting of 08/02/05 Page 3 within the meaning of a "project." Those include (a) continuing administrative or maintenance activities, (b) organizational or administrative activities of governments that are "political" or that do not involve physical changes in the environment, and (c) the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical effect on the environment. As City staff has described in this report, there are six recommended conditions which are the subject of the proposed Agreement, and which will be made to LAFCO in connection with any action it may take in a potential consolidation of MUNI with the WCD. It is staff's position that a review of those six conditions (which, again, are simply recommendations) do not cause any direct physical change in the environment or any reasonably foreseeable change in the environment. These recommended conditions largely consist of continuing administrative or maintenance activities. For example, two of the recommended conditions are that the Wash Plan (which is a subject of its own environmental impact report) be continued, and that there be continued employment provided to the WCD's employees. Two of the other conditions relate to the continued recharge of groundwater through existing Mill Creek recharge properties. These recharge operations, again, will not be substantially changed. The remainder of the conditions relate to the creation of funding mechanisms or fiscal accounting for these continued operations. Accordingly, City staff believe the City's and MUNI's entry into the proposed agreement, which simply makes recommendations to another governmental agency, is not a project as defined in Public Resources Code section 21065. City staff also believes that the City Council may use what is often referred to as the "common sense" exemption. That is, a project will be exempt from environmental review under CEQA, pursuant to State Guidelines section15061, if a determination can be made that "it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. . ." City staff believes that is the case of the proposed Agreement. Therefore, if the City Council agrees that this project is exempt, the City, in conjunction with MUNI should its Board approve the agreement, will prepare a Notice of Exemption as provided for in State Guidelines section 15062 and file that notice with the San Bernardino County Clerk. Prepared by: Concurrence: till C///P DO LAS D. HEADRICK GARY HEL Chief of Water Resources Municiol Utilities Director Recommended: Reviewed By: J J HN AV-7D—`SO DANIEL J. M(ZHUGH �! 1. Ci -,&, anager Citv Attorney Agreement Consolidation of SBMWD and SBWCD - Due to a potential conflict of interest, Councilmember Gilbreath retired from the Council Chambers and did not participate in this matter; a Public Disclosure of Potential Conflict of Interest form is on rile in the City Clerk's Office. Chief of Water Resources Headrick reviewed the past two City Council meetings and actions taken in regard to the possible consolidation of the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District and the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District and a possible agreement with the City which would recommend conditions to LAFCO. City and San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District staff commenced their discussion on July 21, 2005, and those discussions have culminated in a draft agreement for the City Council's consideration. All of the conditions to protect the City's interests that were recommended by City staff and desired by the City Council are incorporated in the draft agreement. Mr. Headrick summarized the conditions contained in the draft agreement. City staff believes the proposed agreement, as drafted, fully protects the City's long- term interests in the water and habitat resources of Mill Creek and Santa Ana River. If the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District's Board approves the agreement as drafted, staff will provide a copy of the agreement to LAFCO on August 17, 2005, when it is scheduled to consider the possible consolidation with the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District. Based upon the verbal and written evidence presented by City staff, Councilmember George moved to determine that the City's approval of the proposed Memorandum of Understanding with San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District recommending conditions to LAFCO in connection with the possible consolidation of the san Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District is exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Motion seconded by Councilmember Peppler and carried with Councilmember Gilbreath abstaining. Councilmember George moved to approve the Memorandum of Understanding with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, recommending conditions to LAFCO in connection with the possible consolidation of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District, subject to possible non-substantive changes requested by the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District and approved by the City Manager and City Attorney, and authorized the Mayor to execute, and the City Clerk to attest to, the Memorandum of Understanding on behalf of the City. Motion seconded by Councilmember Peppler and carried with Councilmember Gilbreath abstaining. CLOSED SESSION The City Council meeting recessed at 4:04 P.M. to a closed session to discuss the following: August 2,2005 Page 7