The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About7669RESOLUTION NO 7669 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS ADOPTING THE MEASURE I FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure I in November 2004, authorizing the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority to impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable in the incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino, and WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement and traffic management programs authorized m the Expenditure Plans set forth in Ordinance No 04-1 of the Authority, and WHEREAS, the Strategic Plan requires each local jurisdiction applying for revenue from the Local Streets Program to annually adopt and update a Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan, and WHEREAS, California Public Utilities Code 190300 and Ordinance No 04-1 require each local jurisdiction to maintam General Fund expenditures for transportation - related construction and maintenance activities at the required Mamtenance of Effort base year level in each fiscal year of the adopted Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan, which for the City of Redlands is $845,866, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS that the Measure I Five -Year Capital hnprovement Plan, attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, is hereby adopted ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 6th day of September, 2016 (TwtU 0.6 Paul W Foster, Mayor ATTEST Sam Irw , City Clerk I \cclerk\Resolutions\Res 7600-7699\7669 2016-2021 Measure I CIP docx I, Sam Irwin, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of September, 2016, by the following vote AYES Councilmembers Gilbreath, Barich, James, Mayor Foster NOES None ABSTAIN None ABSENT Councilmember Hamson Sam Irwm, City Clerk I 1cclerk\Resolutions\Res 7600-7699\7669 2016 2021 Measure I CIP docx Exhibit 'A' to Resolution CITY OF REDLANDS MEASURE I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN EXPENDITURE STRATEGY Fiscal Year 2016-17 through Fiscal Year 2020-21 The City of Redlands intends to use Measure I dollars to partially fund the City's City Council -approved Pavement Accelerated Repair Implementation Strategy (PARIS) program which will pave 2/3 of Redlands city streets over a five year period. The City's Pavement Management Program, which provides a decision making matrix in identifying streets that are priority paving projects, will be used to determine future Measure I Capital Improvement Plans. Measure I Capital Improvement Plan Compliance Checklist ❑ Do not exceed the limit on categorical expenditures in the Plan Include no more than 50% of estimated annual revenue to general program categories for pavement management programs, system improvements and general maintenance or other miscellaneous categorical expenditures (Policies VLS-9c, VVLS-13c, MDLS-11c) Each jurisdiction shall constrain the total annual amount of Measure I planned expenditures to 150% of SANBAG's forecasted annual revenue for Mi Local Pass -Through Funds, plus any fund balances and/or revenue resulting from bonds secured by Measure I Revenue (Policies VLS-9b VVLS-13b MDLS-11 b) ▪ Projects over $100,000 must be individually listed in the Plan While categorical expenditures are justified in the Plan any single project expenditure in excess of $100,000 shall be listed as an individual project and shall not be included in a general program category (Policies VLS-10, VVLS-14, MDLS-12) • Expenditure of Measure I funds must be on projects identified in the current Capital Improvement Plan adopted by the governing body The Five Year Capital Improvement Plan is the basis for the annual audit Jurisdictions will have flexibility in moving projects around in the Plan, however, in order for a project to be eligible for expenditure of Local Street funds, the project must be included in the current Plan (Policies VLS-11 VVLS-15, MDLS-13) The Plan can be also be modified by action of the governing body throughout the year, if necessary or beneficial A copy of the modified Plan should be sent to SANBAG prior to the end of the fiscal year to avoid an audit finding O Expenditure of Measure I funds on Nexus Study projects must include a development share For capacity enhancement projects to Nexus Study Network roadways, the Capital Improvement Plan must identify the Measure I share of project cost and development share of project cost (Policies VLS-9d VVLS-13d) Maintenance projects or projects that do not enhance the capacity of a roadway do not require a development contribution to be included in the Five Year Plan • Streets and roads under one project/contract must be itemized on the invoice Plans that include expenditures for multiple streets and roads under one contract must list specific streets and roads but may list only the total cost for work on all streets and roads in the contract To avoid an audit finding, the local jurisdiction must (1) List the project with individual streets and roads in the Plan, and (2) Break down the work on each street and road in the project on the invoice (i e an expense must be shown for each project identification) This protocol most typically applies to jurisdictions that group projects under their Pavement Management Program with one cost estimate If itemized invoices are not provided to the auditor and the project exceeds 50% of annual revenue, a categorical expenditure audit finding will result O Measure I Plans must be in the established format. Plans that are in unique formats, budget documents and general capital improvement plans have lead to interpretive difference during the audit process Projects contained in the Plans must be broken down by year of expenditure An electronic format for the Measure I Plans can be obtained from "Measure I Central" on the SANBAG web site at this link http /lwww sanbaq ca oov/funding/member-aoencies.html ❑ Spend Measure I Local Pass Through Funds only on transportation related projects. If there are any questions about the eligibility of Measure I to be expended on a project, refer to the local expenditure policies on the SANBAG web site or contact SANBAG Staff for additional assistance 2016-2021 MICIP-Checklist. DOC MOUNTAIN/DESERT SUBAREA MEASURE I REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR LOCAL PASS-THROUGH FUNDS FY2016/2017 to FY2020/2021 MOUNTAINIDESERT SUBAREARe 0I,OrIbutlo ISO, Pe ntage of Eelin ed An al Local Pa .Thr ugh An nP To al FY16117 thr ugh FY20121 Populatlo Generation FY16117 FY17110 FY10119 FY19120 FY20121 1I Needle 80,93% 8511% $ 127,953.00 $ 132_76077 $ 137,748.90 $ 142_92414 $ 147,723.36 $ 609,110 County/Colorado River 3107% 14.89% ,$ 38,176.58,$ 39,611.04 , $ 41,099.32,$ 42,64343,$ 44075.34 $ 205,606 Colorado River Subarea 1 100.0 1 090 1 $ 166,129.681$ 172,371.811 $ 178,098.221$ 185,567.561$ 191,798.70 $ 894,716 1 1 1 J Txreolynine Peln 35.61% 1 2102% $ 450426.21 $ 488268,79 $ 48'!,240.84 $ 505,999201$ 52072024 $ 2433270 Yucca yeller 2900% _ _ $ 75387057J$ 784,43000 $ 4$ 818,228404$ $ 849310.03$ 8]2,305.1] $ 4,0]6142 County/Morongo Beeth 3539% 1151% $ 368,796.60 $ 383,74639 $ 399,301.37 $ 415485.98 $ 428,735.29 $ 1,994,066 Morongo Sasln Subarea 100.00% r 100.00% I, $ 1,572,693.37 ; $ 1,636,445.16 ; $ 1,702,777.69, $ 1,771,795.21 ; $ 1,819,766.71 $ 8,503,478 Ba ow 4123% --- $ 1,384,980_30 $ 1_43819267$ 1_493,468.364$ 1,550,865024$ 1,608059.57 $ 7475546 County/North Deeert 58.77% 71.37% $ 2,579,999.05 8 2.679,164341$ 2,782,135301$ 2389057.75 $ 2,995,603.67 $ 13,925,960 North Desert Subarea 1 100.00% 100.00% $ 3,964,959.35;$ 4,117,357.21;$ 4,275,603.66;$ 4,439,922.771$ 4,603,663.24 $ 21,401,506 1 1 1 1 1 1 BO Be rLake 8.45% 5233% $ 431,068.39 $ 448,600.90 $ 462,69425 $ 479366.52 $ 494,87078 $ 2,314,607 County/Mountains 90 55% 47.67% , $ 964422.09 , $ 999.177.34 , $ 1,035,182 90 , $ 1072,483 661 $ 1,107,18914 4 5,178,455 Mountains Subarea 1 100.00% 1 100.00% 1 $ 1,395,488491 $ 1445,778.24 1 $ 1,497,677.161 $ 1,551,850.161 $ 1,602,067.92 $ 7,493,062 1 1 Adela 1 y 8.4150 1 1 294° 1$ 053,809.49,$ 700,738.80 $ 73043542 $ 754,924991$ 780,41334 1 $ 3,655.322 Apple Valley 18 ]59 1588% $ 2,030,969.06 $ 2,105272.13) $ 2175,860944 $ 2,248,011 80 $ 2_324,73789 $ 10891 652 He 2341% 1 Y 2003 1$ 2,]35,840.431 $ 2,827,577 86 $ 2,922285.25 $ 3,020,385.101$ 3,122,340.95 y$ $ 14,628,510 Vlcbrvllle 3102 5389% 5,115,617.95$ 5,287,15340$ 5,464,42923$ 5847,63709 2 5838,31690 $ 27353,155 CountyNlclor Valley 1641% 011% $ 1477,269.49 5 1,520804.07 $ 1,577,99794 $ 1,630,904031$ 1,605,96785 $ 7,890,944 Vidor Valley Subarea , 100.00% r 10000% ; $ 12,04030643 : $ 12,453,547.05 ; $ 12371,108 77 : $ 13,302,643.01 ; $ 13,751,776.94 $ 84,428,502 1 Total Mt Dosed Region $ 19,148,777: $ 19,026,499; $ 20,526,215 ; $ 21,251,779 $ 21,969,074 $ 102,721,344 pea tfunla 0%o M9asr Ifu ola nW11 of Perform e(0 h)s 6(4 rtuli B) VALLEY SUBAREA MEASURE I REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR LOCAL PASS-THROUGH FUNDS FY2016/2017 to FY2020/2021 VALLEY SUBAREA Populatlo DIstrIbutlo Pe centage Estimated Ann al Lo al Pa -Thr ugh An nt Total FY16/17 ihr ugh FY20/21 FY16/17 FY17/18 FY18/19 FY19/20 FY20/21 Chin Chino Hills Collo Fonta Gr idTe Highland Loma Linda Montclair Ontario Ra cho Cu amonga Redlands Rialto Sa Be rdln Upland Yu alga Co ntyNalley 1 5.55% $ 1,443,43901 5.09% $ 1_323_80262 a44% $ 894_672.11 13.54% $ 3_521471 02 0.79% $ 205,46249 346% $ 899,873.69 1 5954 i $ 413_525.77 250% $ 650,197.75 1098% 1 $ 2850,466.94 1131% $ 2,941,494.63 441% $ 1_146,948.83 893% $ 1,802,348.17 1391% $ 3_877,]00.29 489% $ 1271,786.80 3.47% $ 902,474.48 8.1554 $ 2,122,245.46 1 $ 1,485742 18, $ 1,535061.30, $ 1,588,788.44, $ 1,652,339.98 $ 1,363,51870' $ 1,40]830994$ 1,457,105.081 $ 1,515,38928 $ 921,512271 $ 951,467421 $ 984,762.57, $ 1,024,153.07 $ 3,627115151 $ 3.744,99640r 3 3,876,071.27 $ 4,031,114.12 $ 211,628361 $ 218,504224$ 226,151.87$ 235,197.94 $ 926,869901 $ 956,993171 $ 990,487.931 $ 1,030,10745 $ 425,931.54, $ 439,774.32, $ 455,16642, $ 473,37308 $ 669,703.68: $ 691,469.05 . 15 $ 7,67047' $ 744,29729 $ 2,935,980.951 $ 3,031,400.331 $ 3,13],499.341 $ 3,262,99932 $ 3,029,739.47, $ 3.128,206.00, $ 3,237,69321 $ 3,367,200 94 $ 1,181,357.30:$ 1,211,751.41 r$ 1,262,44271r 1 1,312,94042 $ 1,856_418.671 $ 1.9-11,7-52751 $ 1,983,836 54' $ 2,063,192.09 $ 3,]26_231.301$ 3,84],333.821$ 3,987,990501$ 4,141,270.12 $ 1,309_940.41 $ 1,352,51347r$1,399,85144, $ 1,455,845.50 $ 929548.71 $ 959,75105i $ 993,350 51 $ 1,033,084.64 $ 2,185,912.821 $ 2,255,954,991 $ 2,335,948 421 $ 2,429,386.35 1 1 1 1 7,708,370.91 $ 7,067544.68 $ 4,776,561.43 $ 18,800,767.96 $ 1,096,942.89 $ 4,804.332.14 $ 2,207,771.13 $ 3471 33825 $ 15,218,346.8_8 $ 15 704 334.24 $ 5123,440.87 $ 9,622,549.53 $ 19,314,526.02 $ 6,789,9378_2 $ 4818,21749 $ 11,330,448.05 Total Valley Reglo 1 100.00% I $ 26,007,910.06 1 $ 26,853,315.82 1 § 27,726,143.78 1 $ 28,627,281.20 I $ 29,536,901.65 $ 138,853,529.97 al pa -ihr ugh funds equal 20% of total Me el funds ollecled. 75040720 not chen06, olio. or mo dify MIs Iomplat7, Ilse plop 61000 610n 507 0540 ofw:rk0hael Lo add rows rather than manually inserling rows to ensure formulm are carred 01700511. MEASURE I LOCAL STREET PASS-THROUGH FUNDS FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PLAN PERIOD: FY2UI6f2017 to FY2020:2021 1 AGENCY NAME: City of Redlands FY2016/2017 FY2017/2018 F1'291052019 FY2019,2020 FY2020l2021 Tto.m.ve2 e ...to CARRYOVER BALANCE: $7,075,825,37 MEASURE I ESTIMATE: S1,146,545.53 V.181,357.30 81,219,751 Al 51,262,442,71 51,312,940,42 $13,199,208,04 Eallmrkd Toni Pmlmlte. 5 5.127.105.00 5.07105127 FY61102017 000017 �1 FTM15 076 PfA192020 FYMSl'2021 Tc101 Lo421520W Manure! 01mram. 51127,105.00 .1 Named Projects: C, OF REMANDS PARIS PRC PROGRAM Harr H1H m 5ro lel we CFucar Gum. 5 1.14],542.00 Cmywer an Camrd 5 1..1872 .00 Curywer Fantle Cum. 220.791 W S t E00230 Cam... rung Cum,d .202,7 2827T1.00 Grande Carlen, Er17w1e 5 1.013.6000 5009 0000 50.. M. 5aW 5006 saw 5000 50,00 50 60 50.00 M 00 I 50 00 54.00 50.00 .00 51017 50.00 5000 50.00 6000 50.60 50 W 50 W 5000 5000 50.00 Praeel Ct., NaraRM.Too1� 8 5.121.10500 8 5 1.197,86200 S - S 1.112.850,00 5 S 1.000231m 6 5 1�nem S 5 1218.000.00 51.527,105.00 I T013150010101 070001:5 0127.10551,107.4,_.5 1.1 A]Srya oo 51.182 950.00 81]00 ATW 54212 T22,60 51,919000.01 56.127.10400I%1la,ned Pnlste 190% 160%100% 100% 100% Categorical Protects Total r: 50.06 5000 50 00 so sox se oo 5600 CM5.elFmfTo .d7bl 5 - - 0 s - s - s 5 5500 %105a P1,154. Iwam irm.rr.ad .1 a%0 04 0$4 I 27 Ca07.YE.2.oOO rrn;non. 0100 ACare507ierheac Ilacerelane n 151re1.0.e Phe, 701100 Yw7a400121tlu1a isl,rcexma9l inaLmea 1 _ salve& 9 1700, 1.re 571..0 122120 0enalo0000 m.rei.:=w% 1n,0eall on .1 P ,..enllee.ele22170201201d rarer.,. aePl.ab Men el e,. gun., bad 5 ae.wee.5Iiirtmemmen Plee a.0 d1o..N1PG6y mof.11.1 �dl w lois tt1115.5Roolubart PESOLUTHR, NURSER. PESO -URI. .APPAOVAL DATE' INTACT PEPSIN.5 TIRE: A.awlw,a& 0.,m,000,115w7., CONTACTRC51E: 555m9_7524 e. CONTACT EMAIL ona,1,41y 101 minim. 5 5.12110500 To ICa,110rer P.go,r.ned5 Tote, Es0erelea17 mn.d 5 8.127.10500 10, i 8.127.105.00 150% 01 511736111.0.6. 11,..42. 02020 19 .:5 796699.06 Cow r660. g mmr.1,0cmd 150%I1nn' 01