HomeMy WebLinkAbout7668RESOLUTION NO 7668
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS
ADOPTING THE MEASURE I FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL PROJECT NEEDS
ANALYSIS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2017/2018 THROUGH 2021/2022
WHEREAS, San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure I m
November 2004, authorizing the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority to
impose a one-half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable m the
incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino, and
WHEREAS, revenue from the tax can only be used for transportation improvement
and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set forth in
Ordinance No 04-1 of the Authonty, and
WHEREAS, the Strategic Plan requires each local jurisdiction applying for revenue
from certain Measure I Programs to annually adopt and update a Five -Year Capital Project
Needs Analysis, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF REDLANDS that the Measure I Five -Year Capital Project Needs Analysis,
attached to this resolution as Exhibit A, is hereby adopted
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 6th day of September, 2016
—‘t j2Alt opt fr
Paul W Foster, Mayor
ATTEST
Sam Irwin, City Clerk
I 1cclerk\Resolutions\Res 7600-7699\7668 - 2017-2022 Measure I 5 Year CPNA.docx
I, Sam Irwin, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution
was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of
September, 2016, by the followmg vote
AYES Councilmembers Gilbreath, Barich, James, Mayor Foster
NOES None
ABSTAIN None
ABSENT Councilrnember Harrison
Sam Irwin, City Clerk —'
I 1cclerk\Resolutions\Res 7600-7699\7668 - 2017-2022 Measure 15 Year CPNA docx
Exhibit A to Resolution
Capital Project Needs Analysis
Checklist
FY 2017/2018 to FY 2021/2022 Submittals
❑ CPNAs are in the established format. There is an established format for the
CPNA that will enable SANBAG to prepare the cash flow analysis more
expeditiously Instructions and login information for the CPNA Database will be
transmitted to each jurisdiction's representative on the TTAC.
Cost estimates included in CPNAs are in today's (FY 2016/2017) dollars. The
first fiscal year 2017-2018 will be the actual SANBAG Board approved allocation.
SANBAG staff will apply an escalation factor to the remaining four years for
purposes of the cash-flow analysis.
❑ The Council/Board of Supervisors approved CPNA and resolution (or
evidence of Minute Action) are to be included in the submittal to SANBAG.
CPNAs require Council/Board approval as it provides the project priorities of your
governing body It also provides a commitment to the development mitigation
funding requirement. Approval may be by resolution or Minute Action.
❑ Projects and project phases included in the CPNA are within available
funding limits and can be realistically accomplished within the identified
timeline. The CPNA is not intended to be a project 'wish list' for local jurisdictions
seeking Measure I funding. Realistic project schedules will be a consideration in
the cash flow analysis and ultimately the SANBAG staff apportionment
recommendation to the SANBAG Board.
❑ Include costs for projects and project phases during the fiscal year in which
expenditures are anticipated to occur Measure I programs are to be funded on
the basis of cash flow
❑ Projects must be included in the SANBAG Nexus Study, and development
fees (or loans to development fee account) are expected to be available at
the time of the proposed expenditures. Projects not included in the SANBAG
Nexus Study are ineligible for an allocation of Measure I Major Street Program
funding. However jurisdictions may fund their development mitigation contribution
through internal loans or loans from SANBAG, as described in the Strategic
Plan, but the loans must be designated on the CPNA form. SANBAG staff will use
the information contained within the CPNA and the Development Mitigation Annual
Report to assess the development mitigation availability as it annually prepares the
cash flow analysis and apportionment recommendation to the SANBAG Board.
Capital Project Needs Analysis
Agency: Redlands
Program: Valley Arterial Sub -Program
Project Name: Construct a Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Ford St and 1-10 WB
City Description:
(Actual Fiscal Year 2016/2017 dollars SANBAG will apply escalation factors, by year)
Public Share: 76.90%1 Dev. Share: 23.10%
Total Project Cost
(All phases):
340,000
PA&ED
Total Presented Funding
(FY 17/18 -21/22):
450,000
PS&E
Total Measure I Request
(FY 17/18 -21/22):
43,000
ROW
CONST
Total
Funding
Prior
FY 17118
FY 18119
FY 19/20
FY 20121
FY 21/22
Future
Total
Total
MI MAJ ST
10,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,000
Total
10,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
' 10,000
MI MAJ ST
0
43,000
0
0
0
0
0
43,000
DEV FEE
0
177,000
0
0
0
0
0
177,000
Total
0
220,000
0
0
0
0
0
,:220,000
CMAQ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DEMO
0
230,000
0
0
0
0
0
230,000
Total
0
230,000
0
0
0
0
0
230000
Project Comments: Project Comments
Last Update: 8/9/2016 4:09:06 PM
Reference: Measure I Policy 40006
10,000 450,000 0 0 0 0 0
*Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prior years that have not yet been reimbursed by
SANBAG including FY 15/16 expenses.
Capital Project Needs Analysis
Agency: Redlands
Program: Valley Arterial Sub -Program
Project Name: Construct a Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Sixth Ave and 1-10 WB off -ramp
City Description:
(Actual Fiscal Year 2016/2017 dollars SANBAG will apply escalation factors, by year)
Public Share: 76.90% 1 Dev. Share: 23.10%
Total Protect Cost
(All phases):
340,000
PA&ED
Total Presented Funding
(FY 17118 -21/22):
440,000
PS&E
Total Measure I Request
(FY 17/18 -21/22):
173,000
ROW
CONST
Total
Funding
Prior
FY 17/18
FY 18119
FY 19120
FY 20121
FY 21122
Future
Total
Total
DEV FEE
10,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,000
Total
10,000
0
' 0
0
0
0
0'
`10;600
MI MAJ ST
0
173,000
0
0
0
0
0
173,000
DEV FEE
0
42,000
0
0
0
0
0
42,000
Total
0
215,000
0
0
0
0
0
;215,990
DEV FEE
0
225,000
0
0
0
0
0
225,000
Total
0
225,000
0
0
0
0
0
' 225,000
10,000 440,000 0 0 0 0 0
*Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prio years that have not yet been reimbursed by
SANBAG including FY 15/16 expenses.
Project Comments: Project Comments
Last Update: 8/9/2016 2:51:24 PM
Reference: Measure !Policy 40006
Capital Project Needs Analysis
Agency: Redlands
Program: Valley Arterial Sub -Program
Project Name: Construct a Traffic Signal at the Intersection of Sixth Ave and 1-10 EB on-ramp
City Description:
(Actual Fiscal Year 2016/2017 dollars SANBAG will app y escalation factors, by year)
Public Share: 76.90% I Dev. Share: 23.10%
Total Project Cost
(All phases):
340,000
PA&ED
Total Presented Funding
(FY 17/18 -21/22):
440,000
PS&E
Total Measure I Request
(FY 17/18 -21/22):
173,000
ROW
CONST
Funding
Prior
FY 17/18
FY 18119
FY 19/20
FY 20/21
FY 21122
Future
Total
Total
-
DEV FEE
10,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,000
Total
1Q000
0
0
0
0
0
0
"10,000
MI MAJ ST
0
173,000
0
0
0
0
0
173,000
DEV FEE
0
42,000
0
0
0
0
0
42,000
Total
0
215,000
0
0
0
0
0'
,.*213,000
DEV FEE
0
225,000
0
0
0
0
0
225,000
Total
0
225,000
0
0
0
0
0
,. 225,000
Total 10,000 440,0001 0 0 0I OI 0I
*Prior should identify any expenses incurred in prio years that have not yet been relmbursed by
SANBAG including FY 15/16 expenses.
Project Comments: Project Comments
Last Update: 8/9/2016 4.09:21 PM
Reference: Measure I Policy 40006
Me 1 Major Str et Arte al Prog am Allo alio s & Reimbu ements
Jurist/10o
EgoSeble
Share
Approved
FY 10/11
Allocation
Approved
FY11112
AllOcaln
nppr0ve0
Mils
FY12113
Allocatlo
7PP10805
adjusted
FY1311
Allocatl
11106908
Adju ed
FY 14/15
Alberni n
nyp10868
AdjusIsd
60'15110
Allocation
nppr0ve0
Adjusted
FY 16/17
Allocation
n Sarni
Allocation Ihrough
FY12117
Relmb n Ma
Ihre 6/30/16
Remaining
Balance
roman
a 0
Chino
7,59154
$402,600.00
3633,40000
1155,30000
145,008.00
1148,74520
$720,60333
01,104,00673
33.004.70032
5256045.04
0805,762,30
Chino Hilda
2,19454
5138.720.00
3104,80000
145,950.00
513,200 00
3170,09202
$105,262.09
$310,23020
$1,000,05180
50,00
01,089,051 60
'(Alton
2.53454
0158,70000
3210,00000
452,100 00
015,10000
5240,299]7
0260,00029
$367,17328
$1,307.52144
5155,32029
61,152,201.15
Fontana
19.400%
$1,238,450 00
01,636,000.00
$786,17000
6520,350,00
01626,659 70
11,295,957 71
52.593771 41
$9,013,35306
31,303,192 13
08,256101 75
Grand Terrace
1389%
558,91000
519,600.88
029,100.00
55660.00
0137,927.31
0120,005.04
5202,37443
571345978
054,097.22
$66045956
Highland
6.777%
1431,970.00
5571,200 00
$141,72000
54107000
9526,212.65
0001,23600
$986,25460
$3,301,56336
$0.00
$3,301,56339
Lome Linde
4.0706
0260,390.00
5344,40000
196,45000
024760.00
3318,479.98
0356,25092
$693,34427
$1.083,07517
$0.00
51083,075,17
Montclair
0.597%
$38,11000
$5040000
022,50000
50530,00
536,611 70
$46,24352
181,000.06
3284,79609
16,30840
3270407.69
Ontario
12 272%
0781,17000
51633200.00
143460000
$74,200 00
077600094
11,004,554.02
0167674155
36,974,74552
1343,307,66
55531,437 66
Rancho Cucamonga
5.04404
5023900.00
$426,400.00
$430,19000
53080000
3335,152.13
$401,71782
5561.54612
32,57170807
32,009,407.74
$562,29833
Redlands
4604%
0311,20000
$41160000
$102,12000
026600.0
0300,62559
$418,03294
3707,51082
$2,36060935
$0.00
02360,60935
Rialto
3031%
$247,69000
1327,600.00
301,280.00
02366000
0354,22606
$33054491
5559,62928
31.06353027
01403,000.09
3559,62928
San Bernardino
7.95754
5501,730,00
$660,600.00
5104,35000
547,72000
5613654.11
3714,291.09
11,14404002
$3,84060523
1804,492,05
52,9&5,19310
Upland
2.74314
$190,070 00
$193,20800
$47,04000
3207,000.00
3220,59997
5243,04785
$382,10203
31,446,12485
$1,063,94292
5382,16203
Yucaipa
5.955%
$301,06000
$004,000.00
150011000
53024000
9501,11705
$522,0204
3643,00650
33,184,50962
1381,000.00
02,903,44062
County
12878%
1810,200,00
61,083,600,00
01 ,000,10 00
31,161,52000
11,270,901.65
11,229.657,17
31.380,363 97
30041,46279
03880367.00
64.152 095.70
TOTALS
100.0054
0351,010.00
36,400,00000
09,176,00 00
12,297,680,00
$3202,567.77..
16,932,276.69
313,319,33620'',$51:466,960.56,'^001,664'1¢42144
09616238,12