Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6956RESOLUTION NO 6956 A RESOLU PION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 53 TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A CLASSROOM ADDITION TO AN EXISTING CHURCH AND SCHOOL (APPLICANT WESTSIDE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL) BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redlands as follows Section 1 The City Council of the City of Redlands hereby approves the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed amendment to Conditional Use Permit No 53 to permit construction of an approximately 6,000 square foot classroom addition to an existing church and school in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A," Section 2. The City Council of the City of Redlands hereby approves an amendment to Conditional Use Permit No 53 to permit construction of a classroom addition to an existing church and school, subject to the conditions of approval attached hereto as Exhibit "B," and based upon the following findings (1) (2) (3) Construction of the proposed classroom addition to the existing church and school will not adversely affect the applicable land use plans of the City, because the construction project is consistent with the City's General Plan, specifically policy 10 60b, which encourages the improvement and advancement of educational opportunities for Redlands' residents, and because the Redlands Municipal Code permits the development of churches and schools in any zoning distract of the City, subject to approval of a conditional use permit Construction of the classroom addition will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare because the classroom addition has been designed architecturally in a manner to cause minimal impact on the adjacent properties by (a) utilization of transom windows that are seven (7) feet above the classroom's finished floor, (b) incorporating a setback of eighteen (18) feet from property lines, which is eighty percent (80%) greater than what is required by the R -S Distract, (c) providing a maximum building height of nineteen (19) feet, ten (10) inches, which is only fifty- seven percent (57%) of the maximum height buildup allowed in the R -S District, and (d) providing colors and materials for the building exterior will blend the architecture of the classroom addition with its surroundings Further, the conditions of approval for the CUP amendment include the requirement that a landscape buffer be developed to ensure that any perceived impacts to privacy to the adjacent residential uses, are minimized The proposed classroom addition is in compliance with the regulations of the City's General Plan, the applicable zoning distract, and the City's development standards because the classroom site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed addition, and the addition will meet or exceed all City's development standards including required setbacks, which are proposed to be eighteen (18) feet from the side -yard (10 feet required) and one hundred sixty five (165) feet from the rear -yard (25 feet required), a maximum building height of nineteen feet (19) feet ten (10) inches (35 feet allowed), a proposed lot coverage of fourteen and two-tenths 1 (4) (5) percent (14 2%) (30% allowed) and 56 parking spaces (53 spaces required) for the use applied for have been adhered to The classroom addition is appropnate for its proposed location, because a school classroom use already exists on the site, and the size of the site is adequate to accommodate the expanded use Additionally, the proposed classroom site, is located on an arterial street which is designed to accommodate the traffic expected to be generated from the school expansion, and the existing parking lot facilities are adequate in size to support the parking requirements for such expanded use The proposed addition to the school at this location will not adversely affect the applicable land use plans of the City because it is consistent with General Plan Policy 3 30(c) which states, "Discouraged changes in residential areas that would disturb the character or clearly have a destabilizing effect on the neighborhood" General Plan Policy 3 30 calls for the "Preservation of Older Neighborhoods", Subsection c of this policy prescribes implementation of this policy These homes are not histonc or "older " With the exception of 5 residences, the surrounding residences within a 300 foot radius of the project site were built m the 1970s and 1980s Furthermore, the classroom addition is an expansion of an existing use and does not represent a change in uses the neighborhood or a demolition of existing homes (6) The proposed school expansion will not be detnmental to the public health, safety and welfare because the massing of the building will not cause a substantial negative aesthetic affect on adjacent residences or severely detract from the residential character of the neighborhood because the applicant has made modifications to the addition to reduce the mass and scale when viewed from the nearby street These deign elements include (1) an eighteen (18) foot side -yard setback (10 feet required), (2) a maximum building height of nineteen (19) feet ten (10) inches (35 feet required), (3) transom windows located seven (7) feet above the finished floor elevation on the east elevation to provide for the privacy of the adjacent residences, (4) four individual hipped roof elements, which resemble those of a residential structure, to better integrate the building addition with its surroundings, and (5) a two (2) foot recess in the building footprint to break-up the massing of the addition, with an additional four (4) foot recess at the eight (8) foot wide corridor (7) The proposed school addition is appropnate at the proposed location because the school addition size is not in character and scale to the adjacent residences, it is not too closely located to the adjacent residences because the school addition meets or exceeds the required development standards The subject addition proposes an eighteen (18) feet from the side -yard (10 feet required) and on hundred sixty five (165) feet from the rear -yard setback (25 feet required), a maximum building height of nineteen (19) feet ten (10) inches (35 feet allowed), a proposed lot coverage of fourteen and two-tenths percent (14 2%) (30% allowed) and fifty-six (56) parking spaces (53 spaces required) In addition, the use is conditionally permitted and conditions of approval have been applied to the project to minimize impacts to the surrounding properties 2 ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 15th day of June, 2010 ATTEST. City Clerk Mayor of the City of Redlands I, Sam Irwin, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No 6956 was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of June, 2010 by the following vote AYES Councilmembers Bean, Harrison, Aguilar, Mayor Gilbreath NOES Councilmember Gallagher ABSENT None ABSTAIN None Sam Irwin, City Clerk City of Redlands, Califorma 3 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1 Project Title Conditional Use Permit No 53 (R3) 2 Lead Agency Name and Address City of Redlands Community Development Department 35 Cajon Street, Suite 20 Redlands, CA 92373 3 Contact Person and Phone Number Sergio Madera Associate Planner (909) 798-7555 4 Project Location The project is located at 1495 West Olive Avenue, Redlands, CA 92373 5 Project Sponsor's Name and Address Westside Christian Church 1495 West Olive Avenue Redlands, CA 92373 6 General Plan Designation The current General Plan designation is Low Density Residential 7 Zoning The project site is located in the R -S (Suburban Residential) District 8 Description of Project The proposed project is a request to revise Conditional Use Permit No 53 for a request to develop a 5,968 square foot classroom expansion for an existing private school known as Westside Christian School The site contains a 7,046 square foot church facility, existing 21,000 square foot elementary school, two playground areas with associated landscaping, and two parking lot areas with a total of 89 parking stalls 9 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The subject site is located within a fully urbanized area and is surrounded by residential development to the north, south, east and west The Redlands United Church of Christ is located to the northwest on the opposite corner from the subject site The surrounding residential land uses are a variety of single-family homes with traditional single-family subdivisions and cluster -housing type development The project site is developed with an existing church and elementary school The proposed classroom addition will be located in an area of the site that is adjacent to an existing 21,000 square foot classroom building No indigenous plant or animal species exist on the property Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 1 of 25 10 Other public agencies whose approval is required(e g , permits, financing approval, or participation agreement) None ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED• The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a Potentially Significant Impact as indicated by the checklist on the following pages x Aesthetics _ Agriculture Resources x Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology / Soils Hazards & Hazardous Materials x Hydrology / Water Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources x Noise Population / Housing x Public Services Recreation Transportation / Traffic Utilities / Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared x I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required I find that the proposed project MAY have a potentially significant or potentially significant unless mitigated impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 2 of 25 Sergio Madera Associate Planner City of Redlands April 14, 2010 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e g the project falls outside a fault rupture zone) A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e g the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis) 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on- site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required 4) Negative Declaration Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact " The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross-referenced) 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration Section 15063(c)(3)(D) In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following a) Earlier Analyses Used Identify and state where they are available for review b) Impacts Adequately Addressed Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis c) Mitigation Measures For effects that are Less than Significant with Mitigation Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 3 of 25 Measures Incorporated, describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site- specific conditions for the project 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e g general plans, zoning ordinances) Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated 7) Supporting Information Sources A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats, however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected 9) The explanation of each issue should identify a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question, and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact I AESTHETICS Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 9 b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? 9 c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? 9 o d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 9 Aesthetics I a) Adoption of the proposed project will not affect a scenic vista or scenic highway The City's General Plan MEA/EIR does not identify the project site and surroundings as part of a scenic vista The project adjoins existing residential and institutional development on all sides No mitigation is required 1 b) The location of the project is not in a historic district The site is developed with the existing church and school facilities The site and its environs do not contain any other scenic resources such as rock outcroppings, or historic buildings within a state scenic highway Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 4 of 25 Since the site is not located near any of these items no mitigation measures are needed I c) The project consists of the addition of a new classroom building to add additional classrooms to an existing elementary school The project site is located in a completely urbanized area of the city with a mix of single-family residences and religious institutions The architectural design has incorporated elements to minimize aesthetic impacts on adjacent properties immediately to the east These elements include (1) an 18 foot side - yard setback, (2) a maximum building height of 19 feet 10 inches that does not occur until approximately 32 feet 6 inches from the property line, (3) transom windows located 7 feet above the finished floor elevation on the east elevation to provide for the privacy of the adjacent residences, (4) a hipped roof element, which resemble those of a residential structure, to better integrate the building addition with its surroundings, and (5) a 2 foot recess in the building footprint to break-up the massing of the addition The roof height at the 18 foot setback is 12 feet and over a horizontal distance of 14 feet 6 inches gradually increases to the maximum building height of 19 feet 10 inches at a slope of approximately 0 54 vertical feet for every 1 horizontal foot The project does have the potential to degrade the existing visual character or affect the quality of the site and its surroundings if the design elements are not implemented and instead the design is changed to a flat wall with a parapet without breaking up the massing with the architectural relief that has been provided Therefore to avoid potential aesthetic impacts, implementation of the previously discussed design elements shall be necessary Mitigation Measure No 1 requires the final construction drawings to incorporate the following design elements an 18 foot side - yard setback from the east property line, a maximum building height of 19 feet 10 inches which does not occur until approximately 32 feet 6 inches from the property line, transom windows located 7 feet above the finished floor elevation on the east elevation, hipped roof elements, and a 2 foot recess in the building footprint and to be consistent with the drawings prepared by Sitetech Inc and Robertson Design Group and labeled final design and contained in the project file located in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department of the City of Redlands I d) The project is an expansion of an existing facility No new sources of lights are proposed that are anticipated to be the source of a significant amount of glare No new exterior lighting is proposed as part of the project No further measures are needed to provide any mitigation Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact II AGRICULTURE RESOURCES In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland, Would the project Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 5 of 25 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use'? 9 b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? 9 c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? 9 AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES II a) II b) Figure 5 2 of the Master Environmental Assessment for the General Plan (MEA/EIR) classifies the property "D" Urban Lands As the project contains no agricultural uses and is in an urbanized area of the City there are no impacts to agricultural resources No mitigation is required According to Figure 5 1 of the Master Environmental Assessment for the General Plan (MEA/EIR) and the City's Agricultural Preserve Map the property is not located in a City Agricultural Preserve and is not under Williamson Contract from the State of California, Department of Conservation, therefore there is no impact on land zoned for agricultural use or land under a Williamson Act contract No Mitigation Measures are needed II c) The proposed project will not result in the conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use No Mitigation is required Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 111 AIR QUALITY Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? 9 o c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state 9 0 9 Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 6 of 25 Issues Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)' d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? 9 o e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Air Qualit 9 III a) Adoption of the proposed project involves the expansion of the existing YMCA facility, which will not obstruct implementation of the Regional Air Quality Management Plan as written by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) No mitigation measures are needed III b-d)The project will involve grading and other construction activities near residential development in the immediate area These activities have the potential to generate fugitive dust which could temporarily violate local air quality standards In order to prevent the project from violating any air quality standard or generating significant amounts of dust that would have a negative impact on sensitive receptors Mitigation Measure No 2 shall require that all primary project construction shall implement an aggressive program of construction dust control sufficient to meet the requirements of SCAQMD Rules 401-403 The minimum content of such a program shall include a) control dust by daily water spraying, b) perform daily street cleaning at the conclusion of each workday up to a distance as necessary in either direction of any access points, c) wash off trucks leaving the site and wet down or tarp any trucks hauling dirt away from the site, d) double sandbag all site perimeters adjoining traveled roads from November to April to prevent dirt from washing off the site during the rainy season, e) establish landscaping within 90 -days of the completion of grading, or hydroseed with a native plant mix as an interim groundcover to minimize wind erosion and irrigate as necessary to sustain groundcover, and, f) terminate all grading, excavation and travel on unpaved surfaces when hourly average wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour Wind speeds will be monitored with an onsite wind sensor mounted in an unobstructed location III e) The proposed project is an expansion of an existing elementary school and will not produce any long term objectionable odors No mitigation is required Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 7 of 25 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact IV BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service? 9 b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service? 9 c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? 9 d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? 9 e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? 9 f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? 9 Biological Resources IV a -b) Adoption of the proposed project will not result in an adverse impact on species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U S Fish and Wildlife Service The project site is not identified in the Biotic Resources Map, Figure 7 1 of the MEA/EIR, as being within an area containing endangered, rare or species of special status or rare biological resources, or their valued habitat No mitigation is required IV c) Adoption of the proposed project will not have an adverse effect on federally protected wetlands The project is not located on or near any property designated as wetland No mitigation is required Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 8 of 25 IV d) Adoption of the proposed project will not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites The project site is not identified in the Biotic Resources Map, Figure 7 1 of the MEA/EIR, as being within an area containing resident migratory wildlife or their habitat nor is it used by wildlife as a migratory corridor No mitigation is required IV e) Adoption of the proposed project will not cause a conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources The project is in an urbanized area No biological resources are located in this area thus the project will not cause a conflict with any local polices or ordinances protecting these resources No mitigation is required IV f) Adoption of the proposed project will not cause a conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan The project site is in an urbanized area and is not subject to any conservation plan No mitigation is required Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact V CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in 15064 5? 9 b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064 5? 9 c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? 9 d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries9 9 Cultural Resources V a -b) Adoption of the proposed project will not destroy nor cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical, archaeological, or paleontological resource, unique geologic feature nor disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries The project is in an urbanized area, and is identified in the General Plan MEA/EIR figure 10 1 as an area of no concern for archaeological resources No mitigation is required V c -d) Adoption of the proposed project will not destroy nor cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a paleontological resource, unique geologic feature nor disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries The project is in an urbanized area and is identified in the General Plan MEA/EIR figure 10 1 as an area of no concern for archaeological resources No mitigation is required Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 9 of 25 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact VI GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving 9 i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42 9 ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 9 iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? 9 iv) Landslides? 9 b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 9 c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? 9 d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? 9 e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? 9 GEOLOGY AND SOILS VI a) The project consists of the expansion of the existing Westside Christian School to accommodate an addition for providing additional classroom space According to figures 4 6, and 4 9, of the MEA/EIR the project falls outside of an Earthquake Fault Zone, and areas with generalized liquefaction potential and will not expose people to potential impacts involving fault rupture, seismic ground shaking, or ground failure including liquefaction According to figure 4 4 the project is not located in an area with landslide potential The proposed building will be constructed to adhere to all federal, state, and local regulations pertaining to seismic safety design The developer will be required to submit a soils/geotechinical report outlining minimum site preparation requirements in order to develop the site in a manner that will address these existing conditions No mitigation is required VI b) The site is relatively flat and will not require an extensive or significant amount of soil Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 10 of 25 movement and will maintain the same general gradient after development The project will not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil No mitigation is required VI c) The project site Is not located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project The terrain of the subject site is relatively flat and within an urban area which is devoid of significant slopes and is not identified as being within an area that is susceptible to liquefaction, as depicted in Figures 4 9 The project is not located in an area that has been identified to have landslide potential The proposed building will be constructed to adhere to all federal, state, and local regulations pertaining to seismic safety design No mitigation is required VI d) The project site is underlain by expansive soil as depicted in Figure 4 5 of the MEA/EIR but will not result in creating substantial risks to life or property as explained in item VI b No mitigation is required VI e) The existing facility is currently connected to the City's sewer system, therefore, these types of waste water disposal systems will not be used No mitigation is required Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact VII HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? 9 b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment'? 9 c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? 9 d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code section 65962 5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? 9 e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 9 f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 9 Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 11 of 25 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 9 h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving midland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials VII a -h) Adoption of the project does not involve the use of hazardous materials and will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment, nor will it cause hazardous emissions or involve the handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school The site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites and will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment Adoption of the proposed project will not result in impairing implementation of or physically interfering with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan The project will only require occasional servicing and thus will not expose people or structures to a safety hazard nor would the project result in significant risk of loss, injury or death from midland fires No mitigation is required Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact VIII HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? 9 o b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e g , the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been Granted)? 9 Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 12 of 25 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site? 9 d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? 9 e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 9 f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 9 g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? 9 h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? 9 i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? 9 j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? 9 Hydrology and Water Quality VIII a) The proposed project will not specifically violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements However, since grading and site preparation activities will require preparation and approval of a grading plan, the project would be required to adhere to the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements for a permit under the Federal National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Thus, in order to ensure that the project would not cause any groundwater quality impacts during grading and construction activities, Mitigation Measure No 3 shall require the project to comply with all requirements of the NPDES permit issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and the City of Redlands The project shall also provide the appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) within the project site to stop "first flush" of accumulated pollutants from entering the City storm drain system The project shall also provide the appropriate NPDES filter system to stop the "first flush" of accumulated pollutants on the street surfaces Adherence to this mitigation measure will reduce all associated water quality impacts below a level of significance VIII b) The proposed project is not large enough that it will substantially deplete groundwater Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 13 of 25 VIII c) supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level No mitigation is required The project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, alter the course of a stream or river, or result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site The proposed grading plan for the expansion of the Westside Christian School indicates that the project will connect to the existing storm drain system on the east side of the project Surface runoff created by the new building will be directed into a new on- site storm drainage system designed in accordance with the City's standards The applicant will pay impact fees for project drainage impacts No mitigation is required VIII d) As noted above in item VIII(c), the proposed project would not substantially alter existing drainage patterns, but would result in an increase in the rate and amount of surface runoff This includes the new runoff created from development of the site The developed site's flows would be conveyed via an on-site storm drainage system designed in accordance with the City's standards VIII e) As discussed in the preceding response, developed site runoff would be collected by an on-site storm drainage system designed in accordance with the City's standards The developed site would change the composition of site runoff from a mixture of soil sediments to a mixture of "urban" pollutants Runoff flowing across the developed site would pick up a variety of water contaminants from landscape planters, driveways, streets, and rooftops Pollutants from such areas typically include oils, fuel residues, heavy metals (associated with gasoline and deposition of atmospheric particles), litter, fertilizers, and pesticides Studies by the U S Environmental Protection Agency have determined that a "first flush" rain storm producing one-half inch of runoff over a one-hour period is enough to wash off 90 percent of the total accumulated pollutants on the street surfaces This means that the vast majority of polluted runoff from the project site would occur during the first period of a rainstorm, and that the level of contaminants contained in site runoff would decrease as the rains continue No significant water quality impacts are anticipated as a result of developed site runoff No mitigation is required VIII f) No potential water quality impacts other than those already described in this section are forecast No mitigation is required VIII g,h) The project site is not in the 100 -year flood zone as depicted on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Map and therefore structures would not impede or redirect flood flows No mitigation measures are needed VIII i) The proposed project will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam since it is not in the vicinity of a levee or dam No mitigation is required VIII j) Adoption of the proposed project will not expose people to seiche hazards because the area is not within an area that is affected by these types of hazards, as stated in Section 4 2 3 2 of the MEA/EIR No mitigation is required Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 14 of 25 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact IX LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the project a) Physically divide an established community'? 9 b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? 9 c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? 9 Land Use and Planning IX a) The project site is located within an urbanized area of Redlands and contains a mix of single-family residential uses Adequate vehicular access exists from Olive Avenue No mitigation is required IX b) IX c) The proposed project is consistent with the Redlands General Plan and Municipal Code The project site is not within any zoning overlay district or other regulatory planning area established for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect Based on these considerations, no impacts related to conflicts with applicable land use plans, policies or regulations are anticipated from project implementation No mitigation is required As described in the earlier responses to the questions in Section IV concerning biological resources, the project site contains no sensitive or protected plants or animals or any important habitat There are no conservation plans governing the use of this site No mitigation is required Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact X MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? 9 b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 9 Mineral Resources X a -b) The project is not within a known mineral resource area as identified in General Plan Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 15 of 25 MEA/EIR figure 8 2 Therefore the project would not result in the potential loss of mineral resources from the area No mitigation is required Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XI NOISE. Would the project a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies'? 9 o b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? 9 c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 9 d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 9 e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 9 f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 9 Noise XI a) The proposed project would generate short-term noise in association with site grading and construction -related vehicle/equipment operation, during the construction period Noise levels that would be generated on- and off-site would depend on the type and number of equipment in use, the time of day, and the amount of time that machinery and equipment are operated The sensitive noise receptors within the vicinity would be the residences adjacent to the west and south of the site In order to mitigate potential short- term impact to ambient noise during the construction period, Mitigation Measure No. 4 shall limit the time of construction activities to the hours from 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m during the week with no construction activities permitted during Saturdays, Sundays and Federal Holidays This will reduce this potential impact to a level of non -significance XI b) Site preparation would require only standard earthmoving equipment No ripping or blasting would be necessary to excavate through the alluvial materials on site Groundwater levels are estimated at greater than 100 feet, therefore, no piles will need to be driven to reach a stable rock foundation for any structures The project site will require demolition of structures and pavement where a jack hammer may be needed during the Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 16 of 25 XI c) XI d) site clearing phase Construction activities are required to be limited to daytime hours during the week when residents are typically at work Ground borne vibration or noise impacts may occur but would be for a limited time while demolition is being completed The project would contain uses permitted in the zone district, and are prohibited from the use of machinery and equipment that would result in measurable vibration impacts off- site No long-term vibration impacts, therefore, would occur as a result of this project No mitigation is required Long-term off-site noise associated with traffic traveling to and from the project site would occur during daylight hours and to some extent during nighttime hours Noise generated by project -related traffic would occur mostly on the main roads leading directly to the project site, including Olive Avenue and Bellevue Avenue Since this project is consistent with the land use designation and intensity standards set forth in the City's General Plan and Municipal Code, it would not generate more traffic than what is included in the General Plan buildout forecasts Long-term, cumulative noise levels along the roadway system affected by this project's traffic would not, therefore, increase as a result of this project Exterior noise would be generated in the on-site parking areas and at loading areas that would not be substantially louder than the ambient noise levels due to the impact of the existing facility and surrounding commercial uses on ambient noise Long- term increases in ambient noise levels at the project site would be considered insignificant No mitigation is required Please refer to the response to XI(a) above regarding short-term construction impacts The addition to the Westside Christian School will not involve any additional activities that do not already occur at the site As described above in items XI(a) and (b), no significant short- or long-term noise -related impacts are anticipated from the proposed project No mitigation is required XI e) The project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport Accordingly, no associated impacts would occur No mitigation is required XI f) The project site is not in close proximity to a private airstrip, no associated impacts are anticipated No mitigation is required Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XII POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of road or other infrastructure)? 9 b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 9 Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 17 of 25 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 9 Population and Housing XII a -c) Growth in population is controlled by land use regulations which dictate the type and density of development which can occur The proposed project only concerns the expansion of an existing private elementary school No part of this project has the potential to either directly or indirectly induce substantial growth or displace existing housing, especially affordable housing No mitigation is required Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XIII PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services 9 b) Fire protection? 9 a) Police protection? 9 o b) Schools? 9 c) Parks? 9 d) Other public facilities? 9 Public Services XIII a) Adoption of the proposed project is not expected to significantly impact or result in a need for new or altered public services provided by the City of Redlands, the Redlands Unified School District, or other governmental agencies Development of the site will entail the storage of building equipment and materials on-site over night The storage of equipment and materials could potentially result in their theft if adequate measures are not taken Mitigation Measure No. 5 shall require a construction site security plan approved by the police department providing adequate security measures such as lights, video cameras, vehicle transponders, locks, alarms, trained security personnel, fencing etc The nature of the measures will depend on the specific requirements of the site, and may vary with the different stages of construction The applicant shall be Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 18 of 25 responsible for the compliance of all sub -contractors working on the site Other impacts associated with new development are mitigated with the payment of development impact fees, and State established school fees Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XIV RECREATION Would the project a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? 9 b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which have an adverse physical effect on the environment? 9 Recreation XIV a -b) The project consists of the expansion of an existing private elementary school Based upon the absence of a residential component of the project, implementation will neither adversely affect neighborhood or regional parks nor create a significant new demand for additional recreational facilities Any potential direct or indirect impacts would be offset through the payment of development impact fees assessed at the time of permit issuance No mitigation is required Less Than Potentia Significant Less Ily With Than Significa Mitigation Significa nt Incorporat nt No Issues Impact ed Impact Impact XV TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC Would the project a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (I e , result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? 9 b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? 9 c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in 9 Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 19 of 25 Issues Less Than Potentia Significant Less Ily With Than Significa Mitigation Significa nt Incorporat nt No Impact ed Impact Impact location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e g , sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g , farm equipment)? 9 e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 9 f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 9 g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e g , bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? 9 XV a) The project entails the construction of an approximately 5,968 classroom building No new uses are contemplated or proposed by the expanded facility that doesn't already occur at the project site Therefore, a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips is not expected that would overburden the street system No mitigation is required XV b) Vehicle trips are not expected to substantially increase and current levels during the peak hour do not exceed the threshold of 1000 peak hour vehicle trips, this project is not subject to the traffic analysis criteria set forth in the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Plan This project will not result in exceedance of the level of service standards of any identified roadway segments in the CMP No mitigation is required XV c) Access to the project site by parents dropping off children requires ground transportation only No air traffic demand would be created or affected by this project The subject site is not within any airport land use planning area and is not subject to building height restrictions due to aircraft flight patterns No mitigation is required XV d) The current design of the project will not create a traffic safety hazard The project proposes to expand the addition of a classroom building while adding no additional driveway cuts and the provision of adequate and safe ingress and egress will be maintained No mitigation is required XV e) Emergency access to adjoining properties is currently available without crossing through the project site and project construction and operation would not change this condition No mitigation is required XV f) The project entails the addition of a 5,968 square foot classroom building The existing parking facility along Olive Avenue contains 56 spaces, 9 more than required to accommodate all the uses on-site, including the new classroom building No mitigation Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 20 of 25 is required XV g) Adoption of the proposed project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation No mitigation is required Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XVI UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? 9 b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 9 c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 9 d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 9 e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? 9 f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? 9 g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? 9 Utilities and Service Systems XVI a) The project will be required to connect to the City's sewer system which is required to comply with the Wastewater Treatment requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control District No further action is required XVI b) The project will not require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities and/or the expansion of existing facilities No mitigation is required XVI c) The project will not require improvements to the City's storm water drainage system Any impacts to the storm water drainage system are mitigated with the payment of development impact fees established by the City of Redlands and paid at the time of building permit issuance This system insures that all impacts to the City's storm water Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 21 of 25 XVI d) XVI e) XVI f -g) system are self -mitigating No mitigation measures are needed Local water mains and extensions are required for the project or payment of frontage charges for existing mains Impacts to the water service system are mitigated with the payment of development impact fees established by the City Council of the City of Redlands and paid at the time of applicable approvals Moreover the project is subject to the water usage standards adopted by AB 325 No mitigation is required Local sewer mains and extensions are required for the project or payment of frontage charges for existing mains Impacts to the sewer system are mitigated with the payment of development impact fees established by the City Council of the City of Redlands and paid at the time of applicable approvals No additional mitigation measures are needed San Bernardino County has landfill capacity in compliance with State regulations for a minimum of fifteen (15) years including projected growth based on the General Plan Densities that include both the California Street Landfill and the San Timoteo Sanitary Landfill The project will be required to comply with applicable regulations related to solid waste No additional mitigation measures are needed Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact XVII MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? 9 Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects) 9 Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 9 Mandatory Findings of Significance XVII a) Adoption of the proposed project will not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment XVII b) The project will not significantly impact the environment by itself and with the mitigation Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 22 of 25 measures identified within this document will not be cumulatively significant XVII c) Adoption of the proposed project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly REFERENCES Redland General Plan Master Environmental Assessment / Final Environmental Impact Report for Redlands General Plan California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 23 of 25 MITIGATION MEASURES AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM AESTHETICS. 1 In order to mitigate the potential impacts as identified in Sections I c of the environmental checklist, the applicant shall incorporate the following design elements in the final construction drawings (1) an 18 foot side -yard setback, (2) a maximum building height of 19 feet 10 inches that does not occur until approximately 32 feet 6 inches from the property line, (3) transom windows located 7 feet above the finished floor elevation on the east elevation to provide for the privacy of the adjacent residences, (4) a hipped roof element, which resemble those of a residential structure, to better integrate the building addition with its surroundings, and (5) a 2 foot recess in the building footprint to break-up the massing of the addition Additionally the final construction drawings shall be consistent with the drawings prepared by Sitetech Inc and Robertson Design Group and labeled final design and contained in the project file located in the Planning Division of the Community Development Department of the City of Redlands and shall be subject to review and approval by Planning Division of the Community Development Department prior to issuance of building permits for the project To be monitored by the Community Development Department, Planning Division, and satisfied prior to the issuance of building permits for the project AIR QUALITY• 2 In order to mitigate potential impacts as identified in Section III(b-d) of the Initial Study Checklist, all primary project construction shall implement an aggressive program of construction dust control sufficient to meet the requirements of SCAQMD Rules 401-403 The minimum content of such a program shall include a) control dust by daily water spraying, b) perform daily street cleaning at the conclusion of each workday up to a distance as necessary in either direction of any access points, c) wash off trucks leaving the site and wet down or tarp any trucks hauling dirt away from the site, d) double sandbag all site perimeters adjoining traveled roads from November to April to prevent dirt from washing off the site during the rainy season, e) establish landscaping within 90 -days of the completion of grading, or hydroseed with a native plant mix as an interim groundcover to minimize wind erosion and irrigate as necessary to sustain groundcover, and, f) terminate all grading, excavation and travel on unpaved surfaces when hourly average wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour Wind speeds will be monitored with an onsite wind sensor mounted in an unobstructed location To be monitored by the Community Development Department, Building and Safety Division, during construction of the project HYDROLGY AND WATER QUALITY 3 To mitigate the potential impacts identified in Section VIII(a) of the Environmental Checklist, the applicant shall be required to comply with all requirements of the NPDES permit issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board and the City of Redlands The project shall also provide the appropriate NPDES filter system within the inlet box to stop "first flush" of Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 24 of 25 accumulated pollutants on the street surfaces To be monitored by the Municipal Utilities and Engineering Department and satisfied during construction of the project NOISE. 4 To mitigate the potential short term impacts identified in Section XI(a) of the Environmental Checklist relative to the increase in ambient noise levels in the early morning and evening hours from construction activities, all grading and construction activities shall be limited to the hours from 7 00 a m to 6 00 p m , Monday through Saturday and prohibited on Sundays and Federal Holidays To be monitored by the Community Development Department, Building & Safety Division and Planning Division, and satisfied during construction of the project PUBLIC SERVICES• 5 To mitigate the potential impacts as identified in Section XIII(a) of the Initial Study Checklist, the applicant shall prepare a construction site safety plan to be approved by the Police Department prior to issuance of grading permits which details the use of adequate security measures such as lights, video cameras, vehicle transponders, locks, alarms, trained security personnel, fencing, etc To be monitored by the Planning Division of the Community Development Department and the Police Department, prior to the issuance of grading permits Initial Study for CUP No 53 (R3) FORM J Page 25 of 25 EXHIBIT 'B' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Prepared on November 30, 2009 Applicant: Westside Christian Church Location 1495 West Olive Avenue CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 53 REVISION NO 3 1 Unless construction has commenced pursuant to a building permit, or a time extension is granted in accordance with Code, this approval shall expire two (2) years from the date of approval 2 This approval is for a Conditional Use Permit to develop a 5,968 square foot classroom expansion for an existing private school (Westside Christian School) located at 1495 West. Olive Avenue in the R -S, Suburban Residential District. 3 All plans submitted to the City shall reflect all Planning Commission approvals and any other changes required by the Commission and/or staff This condition applies to site plans, landscape plans, elevations, grading, and all other illustrations, text, or plans submitted to the City in connection with the project. 4 The issuance of any permits shall comply with all provisions of the Redlands Municipal Code 5 No Certificate of Occupancy shall be granted until all conditions of approval have been satisfied 6 All on-site utilities shall be placed underground Plans shall be submitted that detail the undergrounding of all on-site utilities, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permits 7 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit plans detailing that roof screening shall be of adequate height to screen any roof -top equipment from public view on all sides subject to review and approval by the Community CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 53 (REVISION NO 3) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DECEMBER 8, 2009 PAGE 2 Development Director Screening of air conditioning and other equipment on the buildings shall be incorporated into or compatible with the architectural design of the buildings All equipment shall be screened from view of adjacent roadways 8 Transformer cabinets and commercial gas meters shall not be located within required setbacks and shall be screened from public view either by architectural treatment or with landscaping Multiple electrical meters shall be fully enclosed and incorporated into the overall architectural design of the building(s) Electrical panels shall not be located on building exteriors Backflow preventers shall be enclosed with landscaping that will provide complete screening upon maturity The location and method of enclosure or screening of this equipment shall be shown on the final working drawings prior to building permit issuance Location of said equipment shall be coordinated with appropriate utility company (i e , Southern California Gas Company or Southern California Edison Company) The applicant shall submit plans showing details of screening subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permits 9 All freestanding walls shall be designed and constructed to incorporate design features such as tree planter wells, variable setbacks, split face block, columns, decorative caps, or other such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall surface and shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of building permits 10 The Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be approved by the following City departments, prior to the issuance of building permits a The Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Municipal Utilities Director for compliance with the Water Conservation Landscaping Act of 1990 (AB 325) prior to final review and approval by the Community Development Director b The Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director prior to final review and approval by the Community Development Director c Submit the Landscape and Irrigation Plans with each set of construction plans directly to the Building & Safety Division of the Community Development Department for distribution to other departments and for CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 53 (REVISION NO 3) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DECEMBER 8, 2009 PAGE 3 review and approval by the Community Development Director 11 The project site shall be kept in a weed and dust free condition throughout all periods of development. 12 All building lighting shall contain shields that prevent light and glare from projecting outward The illumination along all property lines of the project site shall not exceed 0 5 foot candle The applicant shall submit a photometric plan and received approval from the community development department prior to the issuance of building permits 13 Noise producing equipment shall be acoustically insulated to prevent impacts on adjacent residential uses and/or sensitive receptors The location of such equipment shall be shown on the site plan and shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permits The plans should also detail any noise reduction measures taken 14 All fire sprinkler risers shall be placed inside buildings Any other exterior fire and/or mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened or painted to match the building color, except for equipment designated by the Fire Chief as being exempt from this requirement. 15 The landscape plans for the site shall be approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of Building Permits and shall include the following a Provision of a landscape key shall include the species of landscape material used, its frequency, and whether it is deciduous or evergreen All shrubs shall have a minimum size of five (5) gallons b Placement of a concrete mow strip between turf and other surfaces c Provision of a detail that shows all trees shall be double staked and have arbor guards if they are in a turf area d Clear indication where landscaping will be used to screen mechanical, electrical, or irrigation equipment. e Landscape and Irrigation Plans must be attached to the Building Plans CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 53 (REVISION NO 3) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DECEMBER 8, 2009 PAGE 4 submitted to the Building and Safety Division of the Community Development Department. f Submit one copy of the Landscape and Irrigation Plans directly to the Planning Division of the Community Development Department. g The landscape architect responsible for the design of the proposed landscaping plan shall review and certify that installed landscaping meets the specifications of the landscape plan as submitted except as modified in the conditions of approval h All landscape planters throughout the site are to be connected to an automatic irrigation system 16 Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d), certain fees, dedications, reservations or exactions imposed by the City as a condition of approval of this project are subject to a statutory ninety (90) day protest period Please be advised that the ninety (90) day protest period for those fees, dedications, reservations and exactions which are subject to Government Code Section 66020(a) has commenced to run on the date this project was approved by the City 17 The applicant for this conditional use permit, and its heirs, successors and assigns shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Redlands, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees from and against any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, and annul the approval of this conditional use permit by the City provided such action is brought within the time period provided for in Section 66499 37 of the California Government Code The City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or preceding that may be brought against it. 18 All City Department Conditions of Approval shall be incorporated into the general notes of all plans submitted to the City for building and grading permits 19 The existing landscape buffer along the eastern property line shall be enhanced with additional Mondel Island Pines The additional trees in combination with the existing landscaping shall result with the trees being planted ten (10) foot on center along the entire east property line CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 53 (REVISION NO 3) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DECEMBER 8, 2009 PAGE 5 20 In order to resolve the drainage concerns along the eastern property line, the applicant shall conduct recommendations that were provided by Bernhard K. Mayer of SITETECH Inc in the attached letter These recommendations include The removal of the existing vegetation and backfill that is adjacent to the screening wall and waterproofing a portion of the screening wall that is below grade by using a polymer membrane In addition, after backfilling the wall a concrete gutter shall be placed along the screening wall to allow unobstructed drainage along the wall toward the outlet point that is adjacent to the parking lot. 21 To ensure privacy to adjacent residents the transom windows along the eastern elevation shall be non-operable 22 Any evening activities associated with school functions shall not extend past 1000 p m 23 The proposed soccer field shall have a setback of twenty-five feet (25') from the south property line and twenty feet (20') from the west property line 24 Prior to building permits, the applicant shall submit and receive approval for a Minor Exception Permit for the installation of a six (6) foot wrought iron fence along the west property line within the street setback. The wrought iron fence shall extend at least two hundred (200) feet north from the south property line along Bellevue Avenue Oscar W Orci Community Development Director COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING AND SAFETY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 53 (R-3) Date of Preparation July 14, 2009 Planning Commission Date September 22, 2009 Applicant. Westside Christian School Location 1495 West Olive Avenue 1 In compliance with the California Building Code (Application for Permit) and prior to the plan check process, the applicant must submit five (5) complete sets of construction plans and two (2) sets of specifications, engineering calculations, diagrams, soils investigation reports, special inspection and structural observation programs and other data to the building division for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. Plans and specifications shall be drawn to scale upon substantial paper and shall be of sufficient clarity to indicate the location, nature and extent of the work proposed and show in detail that it will conform to the provisions of the California Building, Electrical, Plumbing, and Mechanical codes and all relevant laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations 2 In compliance with the City of Redlands plan check requirement and part of the plan check process, the applicant shall insert the Conditions of Approvals from each city departments as part of the General Notes 3 In compliance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Appendix Chapter 1 (Administration), the structure shall not be occupied until a certificate of occupancy has been granted by the City of Redlands 4 In compliance with the Redlands City Ordinances and during the plan check process, the applicant must submit four (4) sets of fire sprinkler or fire alarm plans for plan check review and approvals prior to building permits 5 In compliance with the California Building Code (Excavation and Grading) and prior to the issuance of a building permit, a soil testing laboratory must submit a final compaction report showing all fills have been compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density to the Building Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6 In compliance with the California Building Code (Excavation and Grading) and prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Civil Engineer must submit a letter of pad certification to the building division for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 7 In compliance with the California Code of Regulations, Title 24 Part 2, (Accessibility Standards) and prior to the building plan check approval, the designer, Architect or Engineer must provide project designs for accessibility for the physically challenged to the building division Submit the design to the Building Division for their review and approvals prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8 Prior to the start of construction and prior to the first building inspection, project address shall be posted, sanitation facility provided, and erosion controls per the City Engineer approved plans shall be in place 9 Prior to Final Occupancy, the design architect/engineer and/or developer shall submit to the Building and Safety office a complete set of approved structural and architectural drawings for the construction of structural and architectural work, including truss, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical plans, which will be transmitted on CD, TIF or GIF imaging file, for archiving purposes per the State of California Requirements Richard Pepper Chief Building Official MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 53 REVISION NO 3 PHASE II ONLY (Revised December 8, 2008) Date of P C. Meeting: October 13, 2009 Applicant: Westside Christian School Location 1495 West Olive Avenue The applicant shall comply with the following engineering requirements as necessary because the required construction is a necessary prerequisite to the orderly development of the surroundmg area and for public health and safety All requirements for development shall be consistent with requirements set forth in the General Plan, applicable sections of Redlands Municipal Code; latest edition of "Redlands Standard Specifications and Detail Drawings for Design and Construction of Public Improvements"; latest edition of American Public Works Association "Standard Plans for Public Works" and "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction — Greenbook", latest edition of "Redlands Water Systems Standard Specifications", latest edition of "Redlands Sanitary Sewer Systems Standard Specifications"; and current Redlands policies and guidelines relative to development projects. A. The following items are required prior to issuance of the GRADING PERMIT 1 Pay plan check fee as established per resolution. The amount is to be determined at plan check submittal. 2. Plans required to be submitted include: a. Precise Grading Plan. Grading plans shall be coordinated with the existing and proposed off-site improvements. b SWPPP/Erosion Control Plan. Erosion/Sediment Control Plan shall be submitted for review and approval. A copy of the project's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be submitted for review SWPPP Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent and control discharges to the municipal separate storm sewer (dram) system shall be in effect for the entire duration of project construction to its completion and acceptance by the City c. Water Quality Management Plan. Submit final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for review and approval. WQMP shall consist of post construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) prepared in accordance with the requirements and guidelines of the San Bernardino County Stormwater Program. The requirements of the WQMP shall remain in effect throughout the life of the project. All plans used as reference for design shall be listed on title sheet of all plans with reference numbers. All plans shall be submitted on 24" x 36"size sheets Six (6) copies of each are required. After final review, grading and SWPPP plans shall be submitted on 24" x 36" size, min. 4 mil, mylar sheets for City's approval. CUP 53 R-3 October 13, 2009 Page 2 3 Submission of plan sets shall be complete and include all required engineering designs and drawings listed in No 2 above. All plans submitted shall be substantially complete, and no plan check queue place -holder plans will be accepted. An incomplete plan submittal will not be accepted for plan check. 4 All support documentation shall be submitted with the plans to be checked. Submission shall include: a. Hydrology Report and Hydrologic Calculations b Geotechnical Report c Easement Documents 5 A final WQMP that is in substantial conformance with the preliminary WQMP and in full conformance with the WQMP Guidance Document shall be submitted and approved prior to the approval of precise grading plans. 6 Cash cleanup deposit shall be submitted ($1,000 00) Deposit will be reimbursed after the work is completed and accepted by the City upon wntten request. 7 Truck route permit is required ($67 00) for all construction vehicles five (5) tons and over gross vehicular weight (e.g. concrete trucks) using streets other than established truck routes. NOTE Cash cleanup deposit and truck route permit submitted during the gradmg process could be transferred to be used during building construction or off-site improvement construction if it is within the time limit specified m the truck route permit, otherwise a new truck route permit must be issued. B. The following items are required prior to RECORDATION OF TRACT/PARCEL MAP No map is required for this application. C. The following items are required prior to issuance of the BUILDING PERMIT 1 Pay plan check fee as established per resolution. The amount is to be determined at plan check submittal. 2. All support documentation shall be submitted with the plans to be checked. Submission shall include a. Hydrology Report and Hydrologic Calculations b Geotechnical Report c Easement Documents 3 All off-site improvements shall be in accordance with City Standard Specifications and Detail Drawings and Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction CUP` 53 R-3 October 13, 2009 Page 3 (Green Book) latest revision thereof. All existing utilities shall be pot -holed to determine the actual depth if no signed plan is available. Field notes will be submitted at time of submitting the plan for review and plan checking. 4 The approximate locations of existing underground utilities shall be shown on the improvement/site/grading plans. The utilities shall be plotted from record and field data. The City of Redlands and the Engineer assume no liability as to the exact location of said lines whose locations are not shown. 5 Provide pad certification to the Building and Safety Department. All SWPPP Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent and control discharges to the municipal separate storm sewer (drain) system shall be in place and shall be maintained throughout the course of the project. 6 Pay the required development impact fees per ordinance in effect at time of issuing the building permit. The exact amount will be determined based upon the review of the final building plan or project information. Development Impact Fees shall include; • Transportation Facilities Fire Facilities General Government Facilities Library Facilities Open Space/Park Police Facilities Storm Drain Facilities Water Capital Improvement Charge* Water Source Acquisition Charge * Sewer Capital Improvement Charge* Solid Waste Capital Improvement Charge* * These charges are required for building permit issuance if Final or Parcel Map was not required for the project or charges were not paid with the Final or Parcel Map approval. 7 Cash cleanup deposit shall be submitted ($1,000 00) Deposit will be reimbursed after the work is completed and accepted by the City upon wntten request. (Required unless previously submitted under Section A.) 8 Truck route permit is required ($67 00) for all construction vehicles five (5) tons and over gross vehicular weight (e.g. concrete trucks) using streets other than established truck routes. 9 Although this project will have an on-going inspection throughout construction, a final inspection for all off-site improvements must be scheduled by developer to certify that these improvements comply with City specifications. CUP 53 R-3 October 13, 2009 Page 4 10 Requirements for Olive Avenue a. Reparr/replace altered, broken or substandard existing off-site improvements to the property boundary Construct underwalk dram, if necessary b. 12 Comply with City of Redlands Landscape Ordinance No 2724 and submit a landscape/irrigation plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect for review and approval. The irrigation system shall be designed and constructed to make use of future recycled and/or non -potable water system. ***13 Requirements for Bellevue Avenue a. Dedicate to provide for a 44 foot half street right-of-way width including a corner cutoff at the property line return to accommodate a 35 foot radius curb return and pedestrian ramp. b. Construct standard curb and gutter 32 feet east side of street centerline. c. Construct standard street section between new curb and street centerline consistent with the City Standard verified through a geotechnical report. d. Construct standard sidewalk along the entire street frontage and ramps at all curb returns. e. Provide street trees spaced every 40 feet avoiding sewer and water laterals. Prepare and submit a separate street tree plan for City approval. f Construct underwalk drain, if necessary. g. Use traffic index of 9 0. Provide for adequate drainage facilities. The applicant shall provide and submit all necessary hydrology/hydraulic studies and calculations in accordance with the San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual to size the inlet box in Olive Avenue. The existing inlet box shall be reconstructed to match ultimate curb location on Olive Avenue. (See Plan No. 1709 -SD available at the Municipal Utilities and Engineer Department) ***14 ***15 All irrigation lines that exist within any street right-of-way shall be replaced with Schedule 40 PVC or as approved by City Engineer ***16 All off-site utilities shall be placed underground. The undergrounding shall include power poles located along the project site's street frontage(s) and may include power poles beyond the site's boundary as determined by Southern California Edison. Those power poles that are 66KV or greater will not be required to be undergrounded. Any power pole(s) that contain a street light may be required to install a standard street light, in accordance with the Municipal Utilities and Engineering Department's standards. Plans shall be submitted that detail the * * * Revised December 8, 2009 CUP 53 R-3 October 13, 2009 Page 5 undergrounding of all off-site utilities, subject to review and approval by the City Engineer ***17 Dedication documents shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor or registered civil engineer (registered prior to January 1982) in the state of California and must be submitted for review and approval before recordation. ***18 Improvement bonds must be posted for the total estimated cost of off-site improvements as follows Performance 90% in bond form (Warranty) 10% in cash (minimum $500.00) Labor and Materials 100% in bond form Acceptable bond types are Surety Bonds, Letter of Credit from a qualified Bank or institution, Cash Deposits, or Set Aside Letter (savings account) in City's name. ***19 The 10% performance (warranty) deposit will be retained for one year after completion and acceptance of public improvements by the City for warranty of off- site work. ***20 Execute Public Improvement Agreement. D The following items are required prior to approval of APPLICATION FOR WATER SERVICE CONNECTION and prior to WATER METER INSTALLATION 1 No Water Meter is required for this application. E. The following items are required prior to issuance of the ENCROACHMENT PERMIT 1 Cash cleanup deposit shall be submitted ($1,000 00) Deposit will be reimbursed after the work is completed and accepted by the City upon written request. (Required unless previously submitted under Sections A, B or D ) 2 Section 4216/4217 of the Government Code requires a Dig Alert Identification Number be issued before a "Permit to Excavate" will be valid. For your Dig Alert Identification Number, call Underground Service Alert toll free, 1-800-227-2600, two (2) working days prior to conducting any excavation. 3 Encroachment Permit application and three (3) sets of City approved plans must be submitted for all off-site improvements Encroachment Permit fees shall be paid prior to issuance of Encroachment Permit. 4 A California OSHA Permit Number for all work that is five feet deep or deeper shall be provided. Call (909)383-4321 * * * Revised December 8, 2009 • CUP 53 R-3 October 13, 2009 Page 6 5 A traffic control plan shall be prepared m accordance with the latest revision of Chapter 5 of the State of California Traffic Manual or W.A.T C.H. manual, submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. The plan shall show all required construction signage, warning devices, road closures, detours, delineation, phasmg schedules and anticipated durations of closures and detours for any work within the public right-of-way The plans shall provide names and 24-hour phone numbers of individuals who can be contacted regarding traffic control measures. ***6 ***7 ***8 ***9 A copy of soils report is required with recommendation for the final pavement structural section to be submitted prior to placing of the street pavement. The report shall include test results and boring/sampling locations. Improvement bonds must be posted for the total estimated cost of off-site improvements as follows: Performance 90% in bond form (Warranty) 10% in cash (minimum $500.00) Labor and Materials 100% in bond form Acceptable bond types are Surety Bonds, Letter of Credit from a qualified Bank or institution, Cash Deposits, or Set Aside Letter (savings account) in City's name. The 10% performance (warranty) deposit will be retained for one year after completion and acceptance of public improvements by the City for warranty of off- site work Execute Public Improvement Agreement. ***10 Survey points shall be reset that were destroyed during construction and a second Corner Records filed for those points prior to completion of the project to San Bernardino County Surveyor F The following items are required prior to issuance of CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 1 All requirements as described in Sections A, B, C, D and E of these conditions of approval shall be met. 2. All improvements shall be reviewed and accepted by the City Engineer 3 Streets may be required to have a seal coat applied at the option of the City Engineer Type of seal coat is to be determined by the City Engineer *** Revised December 8, 2009 CUP 53 R-3 October 13, 2009 Page 7 4 Resurface existing roadway as directed by the City Engineer due to utility installations and construction damage. 5 Existing stuping shall be removed and replaced as necessary New striping and pavement markings shall be installed as required by the City Engineer 6 Owner/Developer shall provide recycling receipts as required by the recycling plan. ***7 Owner's Civil Engineer shall furnish tie sheets for all points set or found in public rights-of-way and one mylar copy of recorded parcel/tract map to the City Engineer ***8 All work shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer All as -built plans shall be delivered to the Municipal Utilities and Engineering Department for review and approval as well as a CD ROM.dwg file of the as -built plans. ***9 A list of as -built infrastructure improvement quantities shall be provided in the Excel format provided by the City showing quantities for each street segment (Le. pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk, etc.) G. The following items are required prior to release of $ONDS/WARRANTIES/DEPOSITS. 1 Prior to the release of the deposits for the project, all improvements shall be reviewed and accepted by the City Engineer ***2. ***3 Tie sheets shall be submitted for all monuments found and/or set in the public right- of-way. The release of bonds/warranties/deposits must be requested in writing to the City Engineer ROSEMARY fIOERNING Imhal Initial Director of Municipal Utilities and Public Works Engineering/City Engineer CD/MP akc/th FILE: CUP 53 Rev 3 *** Revised December 8, 2009 CITY OF REDLANDS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 53 R-3 1495 W Olive Avenue Westside Christian Church PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE Charges Bldg Use Amount Due Credit Applied Total Amount Due Sewer Capital Improvement Charge (SCIC) Water Capital Improvement Charge (WCIC) Water Source Acquisition Charge (WSAF) Solid Waste Capital Improvement Charge (SWCIC) School/ 5912 sq ft. $2,600 $1,000 $200 $12,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,600 $1 000 $200 $12,300 School/ 5912 sq ft. School/ 5912 sq ft. School/ 5912 sq ft. ' $0 $16 100 Note. if fees are Tess than credit applied, no credit is returned Fee's include irrigation DEVEOPMENT IMPACT FEES CITY OF REDLANDS MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION Applicant: WESTSIDE CHRISTIAN CHURCH Project Location. 1495 W OLIVE AVE. PRELIMINARY 6,792 S F ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITION Trip Generation Rate. ADT Calculations Single Family Dwelling Units Attached Senior Dwelling Units 0 DU X 3.23 Mobile Home Dwelling Units 0 DU X 4 77 = Bldg Floor Area. Commercial 5,912 sq ft XI 0 01203 = Office Industrial 0 sq ft X 71 12 ADT 0 DU X 1000 = 0 sq ft X = Total ADT = 0 00 0 00 0 00 71 12 0 00 0 00 71 12 File No CUP 53 REV 3 Bldg. Plan No TBD Calculated by- A. COLLETT Date. Approved by' Date. 12/2/2009 Transportation Facilities Fire Facilities. Single Family Residential Multi -family Residential Commercial Office Industrial General Government Facilities Single Family Residential Multi -family Residential Commercial Office Industrial Library Facilities Single Family Residential Multi -family Residential Commercial Office Industrial 71 12 ADT X $ 260 00 = 18 491 55 0 DU X $ 996 00 = 0 DU X $ 700 00 = 0.50 = O sq ft X $ 0.72 = 0 sgft X $ 0.24 = 5,912 sq ft X $ 0 DU X $ 2,644 00 = 0 DU X $ 1,859 00 = 0 sq ft X $ 0.46 = 0 sq ft X $ 0.67 = 0 sq ft X $ 0.22 = 0 DU X $ 764 00 = 0 DU X $ 538 00 = 0 sgft X $ 011 = O sgft X $ 015 = O sgft X $ 005 = 2,956 00 Open Space/Park: Single Family Residential Multi -family Residential Commercial Office Industrial 0 DU X $ 4 482.00 = 0 DU X $ 3 151 00 = 5,912 sq ft X $ 0 62 = O sgft X $ 089 = 0 sq ft X $ 0.29 = Police Facilities: Single Family Residential 0 DU X $ 1,806 00 = Multi -family Residential 0 DU X $ 1,270.00 = Commercial 0 sq ft X $ 0 31 = Office 0 sq ft X $ 0 46 = Industrial 0 sq ft X $ 0 15 = Storm Drain Facilities: Single Family Residential 0 DU X $ 700 00 = Multi -family Residential Commercial 0 sq ft X $ 0 17 = Office Industrial 0 DU X $ 343 00 = Credit Calculations. O sgft X $ 017 = OsgftX $ 015 = 3 665 44 TOTAL. 0 DU X $ 0sgftX $ Transportation Storm Drain 25 112.99 GRAND TOTAL. $ 25 112.99