HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_59A-1979_CCv0001.pdf Tia; AGREEMEW, made and entered into this
6th day of November , 1979 , by and
between THE ATCHISONo TOPM ANIS SANTA Fly
RAIZ.RAY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation,
hereinafter designated "Santa Fe", and the
CITY or RF,DLANDS s a municipality in the
State of California, hereinafter designated
"City".
WIV4ESSETH s
WHERRI'�.,+, City ,proposes to widen and improve to a curbed roadway
width of 69 feet that portion of DEA.P,BOR-1 STREET on each side of and
including the crossing of Santa Fe's Redlands Branch Line track,
designated by California Public Utilities Commission as Crossing No. 2U-
10.9,
U-ICS.9, and;
WHEREAS, Santa Fe and City are in accord as to said proposal,
and Santa. Fe is willing that City or City's Contractor do all work
except preparation of Nanta Fe's track, including the placing of full
depth sectional timber planking therein and than installation of crossing
gates and flashing light signals.
7
NEW IrrMREFOF<Z IT IS AGRELD:
1. City, or City's Contractor, will do all vxark under said
program, including adequate drainage structures in vicinity of crossing,
except that work hereinafter specified to be dons by Santa Fe.
2. City, or City*s Contractor, will comply with Santa Fe's
rules and regulations and instructions of Santa Fe's representatives in
relation to proper Manner of protecting Santa re's tracks and traffics
moving thereon, as well as wires, signals and Bather property of Santa
Fe, or its tenants or licensees, at: or in the vicinity of the word:
during the period of construction of said improv -ent, and shall perform
the work in a manner satisfactory to Santa Fe or its designated re—
presentatives, and at such t=imes as shall not endanger or interfere with
safe and timely operation of Santa Fe's trach and Cather facilities.
3. -Santa Fe will, at its expense, rehabilitate and resurface
the track, including placing of timber planks Co length of existing
crossing being average of 24 feet.
4. Sanaa Fe will, at expense of City, in addition to those
planks :specified above in Paragraph 3, place aaditional timber planks to
accomodate a total width of 84 feet including sidewalk ameas.
_ 2 ..
S. Santa Pe will, at equal expense of Santa Fe and City,
remove existing crossing signs and install two PUC Std. No-9A crossing
gates and cantilever flashing light signals.
5. work specified to be done in above Paragraphs 4 and 5 by
Santa Fe shall be done as soon as practicable, considering completion of
said program, availability of materials and manpower, and 'in consideration
thereof City will pay to Santa Fe, (a) that actual total cost of work
specified in said Paragraph 4, presently estimated by Santa Fe to be
TWMVES ThVUSAND NnW HMRFD SIXTY Dollars ($12,960.00) , and (b) one-
half of the actual total cost of cork specified in said Paragraph 5,
which total cost is presently estimated by Santa Fe to be FIFTY ONE
THOUSAND TWO HU-NDRM SIXTY Dollars '051,260.00).
7. Notwithstanding the method of apporti insert of costs and
expenses set forth above, should this railway-highway crossing work be
financed in whale or in part with Federal Aid funds, Santa Fe shall be
reimbursed in accordance with applicable Federal Laws and regulations,
and Santa Fe's right to reimbursement shall. -not be limited by any pro-
vision of this agreement. City shall notify Santa Pe should a Federal
fund allotment be'made to the Cite for this project.
3
a. Santa Fe shall submit to City a bill for ninety per cent
(90%) of City's share of the estimated cost upon completion of work
contemplated, which bill City agrees to promptly pay. City shall pay
the actual cost upon completion of audit, less credit for the sum pre-
viously paid.
9. That all work covered by this agreement shall conform to
requirements of the Public Utilities Commission of the state of California.
10. After installation of railroad crossing protection signals
and appurtenances under terms of this agreement, Santa Fe shall physically
maintain same so long as they remain in place. The maintenance cost of
said signals and appurtenances shall be shared equally by City and Santa
Fe in accordance with Section 1202.2 of the California Public Utilities
Code, except that City's liability therefore shall be limited to such
funds as are set aside for allocation to the Public Utilities Commission
pursuant to Section 1231.1 of the Public Utilities Code.
11. Santa Fe will at its expense maintain that portion of the
crossing lying between rails of the track and for two feet outside
thereof.
12. City will maintain at its sole expense any street improve-
ment within said crossing other than specified to be maintained by Santa
Fe in Paragraphs 10 and 11 hereof.
_ 4
i
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE CITY of REDLANDS has caused these
presents to be executed and attested by its duly qualified and authorized
officials pursuant to authority regularly granted them by its City
Council and THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY has executed
these presents both as of the day and year first above written.
THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
Its of `G'truc€s
CITY OZ-RE-D S
By
Its Mayor
ATTEST:
Ci rk
5
Mt. 0
ESTIMATE OF COST TO THE CITY OF REDLANDS TO WIDEN AND IMPROVE DEARBORN
STREET, CROSSING NO. 2U-10.9 IN THE CITY OF REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA
DESCRIPTION QUANT UNITS LABOR MTRL OTHR TOTAL
ENGINEERING 125 125
REMOVE 8t TIES
& PLACE 9' TIES 38 ea. 152 592 744
INSULATED JOINTS 8 ea. 1360 1320 2680
REMOVE & REPLACE
RAIL & O.T.M. 200 if. 800 2068 2868
RESURFACE TRACK 400 tf. 1600 400 2000
PLACE FULL-DEPTH
PLANKING 60 tf. 1800 4500 6300
REMOVE CROSSBUCK I ea. 30 30
WORK TRAIN 400 400
FREIGHT 305 305
HANDLING 2220 2220
EQUIPMENT RENTAL 425 425
LABOR ADDITIVES 3595 3595
SUBSISTANCE 610 610
SUB TOTAL 10472 11100 730 22302
CONTINGENCIES 2230
ESTIMATED COST TO
CITY OF REDLANDS 24532
AGM ENGINEERING
Estimate No. I
The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company - Coast Lines
HIGHWAY CROSSIINIG -,V,.aNING SIGN,LS
Estimated Cost of Force account A Redlands, California, as required
for the installation of T X)-No. 91, cantilever flashers and gates with
D-,-- track controls on DearIorn Street, I'lilepost IO. , Redlands District,
Los ".nqeles Division, F.U.C. o. 2U-10.9 CITY Or- REDLANMS
A. Engineering
Preliminary 310.00
Construction B10.001
Total Engineering 1,620.00
B. Signal Labor 81100.00
C. Signal Material 32,660.00
Total Material & Labor 42,380.00
D. Sales Tax 11960.00
Handling 1,633.00
Freight 392.00
Equipment Rental & Dopreciation 2v622.CO
Mle a 1 S 450.00
Billing 324.00
Vacation Allowance 728.001
Health & Welfare & G. L. I. 502.00
Paid Holidays 295.00
R.R. Retirement, Unemployment Excise 2,689.00
Tax
Insurance 11,070.00
Total (D) 12,665.00
Total (A+B-C-tD) 55t045.00
E. Contingencies 5,505.00
F. Less 50% Santa Fe portion 30,275.00
G. Total Signal Cost - "-,*ity portion 30,275.00
!,ssiStant Chief Enginor - Signa l!3
Topeka, Kansas
November 27, 1979
t, F
The Atchison,Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
A Santa Fe Industries Company
One Santa Fe Plaza, 5200 East Sheila Street, Los Angeles, California 90040
213/267-5403
June 3, 1980
(mailed 7/30/80)
File: 231.3(2U-10.9) �v' � 2�4
Dearborn Street
f r>
Mr. Ronald C. Mutter,
r
Associate Civil Engineer
City of Redlands UL 3.1 119
(90
P. 0. Box 280 `
Redlands, CA 92373ns
Dear Mr. Mutter:
Reference is made to your April 15 letter regarding proposed Cost and
Maintenance Agreement between Santa Fe and City, covering improvement of the
above-referenced street in your City.
We have executed the Construction Agreement, and are returning City's
Original for your records. We do this with some reluctance as the cost
figures contained in the document are no longer applicable, and a new
document probably should have been drafted to cover this project. However,
if you wish to use this letter as an addendum to the agreement so that both
parties may be aware of the increased cost, we would have no objection and
we will schedule the project for construction as soon as materials can be
obtained and our construction forces made available.
The estimated cost of track work through the widened area to be borne by
City is indicated in the document to be approximately $13,000.00. I just
received a revised estimate for this work, based on current cost figures,
and I am attaching a copy of this estimate in the amount of $24,532.00 for
your review and records. Also, the signal work, which is to be borne
equally between Santa Fe and City, has increased from $51,260.00 to
$60,550.00, of which Santa Fe will, of course, bear one half. The above
figures should remain stable for the rest of this calendar year and we
should be able to complete the project within that time, providing we do not
incur undue delay in obtaining materials from our suppliers.
Please advise if you wish to proceed with this project on the revised cost
figures, and we will immediately arrange to schedule the work.
Yours very tr y,
ev
W. W. Toliver
Assistant General Manager
Engineering