HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_25-2021FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT TO PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This first amendment ("First Amendment") to the agreement for the provision of
professional engineering services to complete wastewater treatment plant design dated March 5,
2019 ("Agreement"), by and between the City of Redlands, a municipal corporation ("City"), and
Parsons Water & Infrastructure, Inc. ("Consultant"), is made and entered into this 16t" day of
February,2021.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City and Consultant to amend Article 2.1 of the
Agreement, specifically described in Exhibit "l," "Scope of Services" to include an "Amended
Scope of Services," which is attached hereto by reference; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City and Consultant to amend Article 3.2 of the
Agreement to change the name of the City's representative from former representative, Paul Toor
to the current representative, John R. Harris; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City and Consultant to amend Article 4.1 of the
Agreement, specifically described in Exhibit "2," "Project Schedule," to include "Amended
Project Schedule," which is attached hereto by reference; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City and Consultant to amend Article 4.2 of the
Agreement to extend the Agreement until December 31, 2022; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City and Consultant to amend Article 5.1 of the
Agreement to increase Consultant's present total compensation of two million eight hundred sixty
seven thousand five hundred fifty two dollars ($2,867,552) to the amount of six million three
hundred seventy four thousand eight hundred sixty eight dollars ($6,374,868) in accordance with
Exhibit 113," titled "Amended Cost Proposal," which is attached hereto by this reference;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and
Consultant agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
Section 1. The scope of work performed by Consultant pursuant to Exhibit "A" of the
Agreement, titled "Scope of Services," is hereby amended to include the work that is identified in
Exhibit "l," "Amended Scope of Services," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference.
Section 2. Subsection 3.2 of Article 3 of the Agreement, titled "Responsibilities of
City," is hereby amended to read as follows:
"3.2 City designates John R. Harris, Municipal Utilities and Engineering Department
Director, as City's representative with respect to performance of the Services, and such person
-:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-0080.dccxJn
shall have the authority to transmit instructions, receives information, interpret and define City's
policies and decisions with respect to performance of the Services."
Section 3. The project schedule set forth in Exhibit "B" of the Agreement, titled
"Project Schedule," is hereby amended to extend contract duration indicated in Exhibit "21"
"Amended Project Schedule," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 4. Subsection 4.2 of Article 4 of the Agreement, titled "Performance of
Services," is hereby amended to read as follows:
"4.2 The term of this Agreement shall commence on its Effective Date and shall
terminate on December 31, 2022, unless terminated earlier as provided herein."
Section 5. Subsection 5.1 of Article 5 of the Agreement, titled "Payments to
Consultant," is hereby amended to read as follows:
"5.1 The total compensation for Consultant's performance of the Services shall not
exceed the amount of six million three hundred seventy four thousand eight hundred sixty eight
dollars ($6,374,868). City shall pay Consultant on a time and materials basis up to the not to exceed
amount in accordance with Exhibit "C" titled "Amended Cost Proposal," which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference."
Section 6. Subsection 5.3 of Article 5 of the Agreement, titled "Payments to
Consultant," is hereby amended to read as follows:
City
City Clerk
City of Redlands
35 Cajon Street
P.O. Box 3005 (mailing)
Redlands, CA 92373
Email: jdonaldson@cityofredlands.org
Phone: (909) 798-7531
Fax: (909) 798-7535
Consultant
Satish Kamath, Vice President
Parsons Water & Infrastructure, Inc.
100 W. Walnut Street
Pasadena, CA 91124
Email: Satish.kamath@parsons.coni
Phone: (626) 440-3355
Fax: (626) 440-2630
Section 7. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged by this First
Amendment and in effect.
L:\ca\dJm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-0080.docx.Jn
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment, to be effective
as of February 16, 2021.
CITY OF REDLANDS
aul T. Barich, Mayor
ATTEST;
e ne Donaldson, City Clerk
PARSONS WATER & INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.
Satish Kamath, Vice President
k\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-0080.docx.jn
EXHIBIT "1"
AMENDED SCOPE OF SERVICE
The City of Redlands (City) owns and operates a WWTP with a rated treatment capacity of 9.5
mgd annual average flow. Approximately 6 mgd of that capacity is in an MBR system; the
remaining 3.5 mgd is in a conventional
activated sludge process (ASP). Of the Redlands WWTP Projected Annual Average Flows (mgd)
lo.o
current 5.5 mgd annual average flow 9.0
received at the WWTP, about 3.5 mgd is :t;, 8-0
treated through the MBR system, and the 3 7.0
6,0
rest is treated through ASP. Considering m 50
the 0.8% percent per year population a 4,0
growth rate per the City of Redlands 3.0
General Plan 2035, the projected flows Q 2.0 -
1.0 -
by 2030 (the current planning horizon) 00 .
��
Assumptlaw7
I,
are expected to be well below the rated 2010 2020 �o3o �ov� 2050 2060 2G70
treatment capacity of 9.5 mgd (Figure 1).
of Services
FIGURE 1. REDLANDS WWTP PROJECTED ANNUALAVERAGE FLOWS
The scope of work described in this document includes work that was completed as part of the
Phase 1 project, as well as summarizes tasks and associated deliverables for the Phase 2 project.
The implementation of the modified and negotiated scope of work presented herein will:
• Maximize return on investment
• Provides higher level of reliability and redundancy
• Simplify operation by operating one state-of-the-art system (MBR) for the rated 9.5 mgd
capacity
• Defer proposed year 2030 upgrades for several years, meaning significant capital expenses
savings in near future
• Provide higher operational flexibility
• Eliminate permit noncompliance issues by producing high quality recycled water that
complies with permit requirements at all times and is suitable for multiple recycled water
uses
• Bring significant energy savings
4
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-008C.docx.jn
TASK 1- CONDUCT FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT
Phase 1
1.1 Gather and Review Existing Information and Meet with the O&M Staff
The Parsons team will review existing records regarding the facilities, including available record
drawings, reports, O&M manuals, geotechnical reports, permits, 2 years of monthly reports to the
Regional Board, and operational data. A day -long site visit and meeting/workshop with the City's
O&M staff will be arranged to discuss and gather staff s knowledge of the conditions and current
operations of facilities and any undocumented modifications or additions.
1.2 Perform Comprehensive Facility Condition Assessment
Parsons performed a visual condition assessment of the existing facilities as listed below,
compared actual conditions to available record documents, marked up record documents to reflect
actual conditions, and provided an opinion on the facility's physical condition, operational safety,
reliability, and permit and code compliance to operate the WWTP at its design capacity of 9.5
mgd. We determined equipment age or year installed, estimated useful life, general rating of
condition, and notation of significant deterioration/wear. The assessment included the subtasks
described in the following subsections. In cases where multiple similar process units exist (e.g.,
primary clarifiers, secondary clarifiers) and one or more of the units is drained by the City at the
time of inspection, the drained unit(s)and inner condition of the other units based on the
assessment were inspected.
Facilities included in the condition assessment:
1. Headworks
2. Primary clarifiers
3. Primary sludge pump station
4. Peak storage ponds and pump station
5. Aeration basins and blower building
6. Effluent pump station
7. MBR system
8. Recycled water pump station
9. Chlorine Contact System
10. RAS and WAS pump stations
11. Dissolved air flotation thickeners (DAFT)
12. Primary and secondary digesters
13. Dewatering facility
14. Solar photovoltaic array
15. Cogeneration Facility
Electronic records were created to record the information for each piece of equipment, structure,
and control panel evaluated.
5
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend. FY20-0080. d ocx.j n
The condition assessment consisted of four documents: Technical Memorandum 1 for Subtask
1.2.1 (TM-1), TM-2 for Subtask 1.2.8, and the Condition Assessment Report for Subtasks 1.2.2
through L2.7 and 1.2.9.
1.2.1 Assessment of Key Treatment Processes Performance and Capacities
Parsons' team reviewed the design criteria of key unit processes and evaluated their respective
capacities under the current and design loading and flow conditions. Parsons developed a realistic
capacity flow chart, compared with the permitted capacity and made recommendations for
improvements. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) redundancy and reliability requirements,
as well as energy and operational efficiency, were considered to evaluate effective treatment
capacity. A technical memorandum (TM-1) summarizing the analysis, key findings and
recommendations with photos and calculations was submitted...
Understanding that the existing chlorination system is rated for 6.6 mgd capacity with CT of 450
mg/L-min, several agencies are working to convince Division of Drinking Water (DDW) for
permitting systems with lower CT, even as low as 30 mg/L-min. The scope of work includes
condition assessment of existing chlorination system for rated 6.6 mgd capacity.
1.2.2 Mechanical Equipment Condition Assessment
Parsons' team performed condition assessment of process/mechanical equipment for the
aforementioned facilities. Assessment included visual observations and assessment of leakage or
corrosion, disabled or inoperable equipment, identified irregular noise/vibration, remaining useful
life, availability and accessibility of spare parts, materials of construction, etc. Parsons also
collected relevant nameplate data and document key findings with digital photographs.
1.2.3 Major Concrete Structures Condition Assessment
Parsons' team performed structural condition assessment for the aforementioned facilities. The
structural condition assessment included visual examination of the aforementioned facilities.
Parsons made recommendations for more advanced testing such as non-destructive testing (NDT)
for certain vulnerable facilities.
1.2.4 Civil Structures Condition Assessment
Parsons' team performed visual condition assessment of civil structures including sidewalks,
paving and grading, drain structures, and other structures. We confirmed structures shown on the
record drawings (e.g., catch basins, outlets, overflows) to determine effectiveness of current
stormwater management practices.
Assumption: neither drainage modifications nor a drainage plan will be required.
1.2.5 Above Ground Pipelines Condition Assessment
The condition assessment of aboveground pipelines included materials of construction and
condition of process piping. Parsons' team conducted visual assessment of above ground piping
throughout the WWTP including coating evaluation and condition of exposed metals.
6
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FV20-0080.docx.jn
Recommendations were made for ultrasonic thickness (UT) measurement on accessible metallic
components to determine the existing thickness.
1.2.6 Underground Pipelines Condition Assessment and Routing
Parsons' team identified and located key underground process piping (greater than 6-inch
diameter) and utilities (gas, water, electrical) at the WWTP site. Parsons team reviewed existing
record drawings to identify and locate process piping and utilities. This information was used as
the baseline for conducting required ground survey to locate and identify key above -ground
features and their ground surface elevations. The work generally conformed to ASCE Standard 38
Guidelines (Quality Level C and/or D) for the collection and depiction of existing subsurface
utility data.
1.2.7 Electrical Equipment and Power Supply Condition Assessment
Parsons' team led by Reconducted a visual condition assessment of electrical and power supply
equipment, including switchgear, MCCs, significant panels, standby systems, power drops,
transformers and distribution system(s), circuit breakers, manholes and pull boxes, conduits and
feeders, duct banks, and interface with the solar power system. The electrical condition assessment
included checking for corrosion damage, problems related to moisture in conduits and panels, dust,
rodents and code compliance. Open accessible manholes with the help of City staff were opened
and cable and conduit via pole cameras were visually inspected without entering inside. This was
used as a basis to screen underground electrical cable and conduits and identify any areas that need
more detailed investigation. As -built sketches of conduit configuration, sizes, and fill were
provided. The visual condition assessment was documented with notes and photos, opinion of
useful component life and impact on the WWTP operation, energy efficiency, etc.
Assumptions
• Visual condition assessment of electrical gear will require shutdown by City staff to open
panels and MCCs.
• Parsons will provide one man with fall protection and confined space entry training to
inspect manholes.
• The City will provide a confined space entry team and necessary equipment, as needed, for
opening and inspecting manholes.
1.2.8 Energy Consumption and Efficiency Assessment
Parsons identified critical process and non -process loads across the WWTP and conducted a site
investigation to gather key information such as name plate data, start-up current/voltage etc. The
data gathered from the field and record drawings was analyzed and compared against industry
standard energy efficiency benchmarks. A technical memorandum (TM-2) summarizing the
analysis, key findings and recommendations with photos and analysis was submitted.
1.2.9 Instrumentation and SCADA Condition Assessment
7
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Annend.FY20-0080.docx.jn
Parsons' team led by RCS conducted a visual condition assessment of existing instrumentation.
Parsons conducted a condition assessment of the SCADA system. For each item assessed, a
general rating of condition was provided based on estimated useful life, suitability for the
application including any code compliance issues, accessibility and physical relationship to the
process including lines of sight from controls to the equipment.
The existing SCADA system hardware and software was assessed based on useful life including
identification of any system components that needed to be upgraded by virtue of their obsolescence
or their functional limitations. Based on this assessment, the expansion capability of the existing
SCADA system, compatibility with third party systems, completeness of SCADA HMI graphics
and SCADA monitoring features such as alarms, trends, events etc. were carefully analyzed.
Phase 2
1.3 Conduct Testing of Concrete at Headworks to Determine Extent of Damage and Formulate
Repair
Concrete samples will be collected and tested to ascertain condition of concrete, based on which structural
repair recommendations will be made. As a minimum, deteriorated concrete at beam pockets must be
replaced with repair concrete such as Sikaerete 211.
1.4 Evaluate Key Process Pipelines
Critical process pipelines will be identified, and testing methods selected in conjunction with the
City. The following critical process pipelines were identified in discussions with the City:
• 27-inch pipeline from headworks to primary clarifiers
• 36-inch pipeline from primary clarifiers to peak pond pump station
• 36-inch pipeline from peak pond pump station to peak pond pump no.
• 27-inch pipeline from effluent pump station to percolation ponds
• 6-inch pipeline from primary sludge pumps to digesters
• 6-inch pipeline from WAS purnps to DAF thickeners
1.5 Evaluate Condition of Digesters
Evaluate condition of digesters/digester lining for all primary and secondary digesters — Concrete
box at the top of Primary Digester No. 2 has partial structural failure. A detailed structural analysis
will be done to formulate and implement a structural repair plan, to provide a design solution that
will mitigate the risk of further structural faihrre. Digester lining for all digesters will also be
evaluated in detail and recommendations for improvement will be made accordingly. Digester
piping, valving and related appurtenances will also be evaluated in detail. Digester mixing for all
primary and secondary digesters will be evaluated, and necessary recommendations will be made.
1.6 Conduct a Seismic Study of Structures and Buildings
Conduct seismic evaluations of the following occupied structures:
• Administration building
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend. FY20-008adocx.jn
• Operations control building
• Maintenance building
• Wastewater Collections Office building
• Digesters and associated buildings
• Above ground tanks including the MBRs, Aeration Basins, and the Clarifiers
Attached Exhibit E includes a memo on the proposed approach for this seismic evaluation and an
inventory of buildings and structures that will be included in this analysis.
1.7 Water Quality Laboratory Expansion/Improvements
The existing Operations/Laboratory Building will require modification/expansion to accommodate
future space and operational requirements. The upgraded facility will include necessary
improvements -to comply with current applicable codes and standards. Parsons will develop a
program of space requirements for operations personnel, lab process and material flow, operational
adjacencies, and an overall facility layout. Scope of work for the modification/expansion of the
lab building will include the following:
• Condition assessment of the existing Operations/Laboratory Building documenting
existing lab activities, systems and equipment.
• Code of Record of Applicable Codes, Criteria and project requirements will be developed.
• Program and schematic design of the renovation and addition showing administration
offices, restrooms/locker rooms, break & conference rooms as well as the reconfigured lab
will be developed the required upgrades to the equipment and systems will be summarized
in order to comply with current safety, building code and environmental standards.
• Conceptual drawings of the laboratory and support spaces showing new casework,
cabinets, equipment, and support systems will be provided.
Parsons will prepare a Supplemental Facility Condition Assessment Report to summarize the
investigations noted above and present key recommendations categorized by priority, criticality,
and remaining useful life of assets. A draft report will be issued for City review and comment,
continents will be addressed, and a final report will be issued.
Parsons will hold a condition assessment review workshop (refer to Subtask 5.5) to review the
findings of and recommendations from the condition assessment with the City. Parsons will
document all discussions and decisions made in the workshop, and enter this information into a
decision log. Parsons will submit the draft report for review prior to the workshop.
Phase 2 Scope Assumptions:
• Further structural recommendations for deteriorated concrete at Headworks channels may
be provided based on concrete test results; associated level of effort is not included at this
time.
For inspection of buried pipelines, it is assumed that inspection will be done while the pipelines
remain in service using Smartball a technology.
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amencl. FY20-0080.docx.jn
DELIVERABLES
I. Phase 1
• TM-1 Key Processes Performance and Capacities, Draft and Final
• TM-2 Energy Consumption and Efficiency Assessment, Draft and Final
• Facility Condition Assessment Report: summarized field investigations per discipline per Phase 1 scope of work and
presented key recommendations categorized by priority, criticality, and remaining useful life of assets. Draft and Final
2. Phase 2
• Comprehensive Facility Condition Assessment Report: will summarize field investigations per discipline per Phase 2 scope
of work and present key recommendations categorized by priority, criticality, and remaining useful life of assets. Draft and
Final
3.
TASK 2 — DEVELOP MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT REPORTAMPLEMENTATION
PLAN (COMPLETED DURING PHASE 1)
Parsons developed a multipurpose Project Report including a detailed implementation plan based
on findings from Task: 1, Phase 1. The implementation plan includes a list of recommended
improvements for operation of the WWTP at its current 9.5 mgd permitted capacity considering
the criteria of treatment process efficiency, life cycle cost, redundancy, operations convenience,
permitting impacts, energy efficiency initiatives, and process control.
The Project Report includes a capital improvement program (CIP) schedule and phased
implementation plan to support the City's strategy for upgrade and improvement of the WWTP
processes. The CIP schedule and implementation plan includes near- and long-term milestones,
timeline for design, construction, start-up and training, permitting, California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) exemption documentation, SRF loan and/or grants finding, etc.
In addition to above, the Project Report meets the Project Report requirements for the SRF loan
application package.
DELIVERABLES
TA"SK 2 DELTVERAB (COMPLETED DURING PI-IASE 1)
• Project Report/Implementation Plan, Draft and Final
TASK 3 - PROVIDE ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES
Basis of Design (Bid Package) Development
10
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parscros Water & Infrastructure First Amend, FY20-0080. docx.in
Phase 1
Parsons submitted design packages for the Phase lA project in June 2020 and Phase 1B project in
October 2020. The following work was completed as part of the Phase I and Phase 1B projects:
MBR Facility
• Installation of new membranes/eductor system for 6 mgd - Design modifications to MBR
basins to hold preselected membranes in the existing basins for up to the rated average
capacity of 6 mgd (6.6 mgd peak) to provide treatment capacity for Phase 1. To meet the
average daily flow capacity of 6 mgd at the specified fluxes, six (6) trains of fourteen (14)
cassettes each have been provided.
• Evaluation and repair of existing membrane tanks concrete.
• Installation of weirs in membrane tanks — weirs will be provided by the MBR Equipment
Supplier and will be installed in each basin in advance of membrane installation in that
train.
• Ensure MBR system (including air scour blowers) is incorporated into plant SCADA by
modifying existing PLCs - Current ethernet communication cards may not support
communication with the turbo blower CPU which will limit the integration necessary to
achieve the full benefit of the turbo membrane scour blower system. MBR vendor will
provide a current Allen-Bradley ControlLogix series controller and PanelView Plus 7 HMI
to replace the existing obsolete controller and HMI, respectively. Additionally, an ethernet
module will also be provided to isolate the turbo blowers from the larger control network
to ensure no issues with multicast traffic and communication. The existing I/O modules
are current models and readily available, thus not requiring replacement. A few
programming changes will be coordinated with the MBR vendor to integrate these blowers
into the existing system.
Scour Air Blowers
• Design upgrades for air scour blowers will include three (3) 3700-SCFM high-speed turbo
blowers. These blowers are sized for the full plant capacity so that no additional equipment
will be required for the future package. Parsons will coordinate with the vendor for vendor
control system and ancillaries needed as well as on -site time for the vendor
representative. Parsons will also coordinate programming changes that will be needed to
ensure smooth integration of these blowers into the existing system.
• Evaluate any potential structural requirements for installation of air scour blowers and
harmonic filters.
• Design power supply for fine screens and evaluate power feed requirements for membranes
and air scour blowers to determine if existing power supply is adequate.
Fine Screens
• Installation of new fine screens - Parsons will evaluate all potential alternatives for location
of the new fine screen facility and determine most feasible location for both phases. Three
11
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-0080.docx.jn
(3) in -tank inclined rotary drum type fine screens (2-mm perforated) each rated for
7.6 mgd flow, will be installed.
• Design civil aspects of concrete pad for fine screens structure.
• Address general site requirements including site access, site grading, pavement etc. for new
fine screen facility.
• Design underground yard piping for routing pipelines to fine screens and from fine screens
to aeration basins.
• Design of concrete pad and structural platform for installation of fine screens.
• Integrate fine screens with plant SCADA. Develop P&ID and control narrative for O&M
manual - Parsons team will coordinate with the MBR vendor to ensure transition of the
new fine screens to the existing plant SCADA. P&ID and control narratives will be
developed for updating the current O&M manual. Additionally, Parsons will also
coordinate the controls logic sequence chart (CLSC) and the operation sequence chart
(OSC).
Digestion System Upgrades
• Design addition of new boilers for consistent heating of digesters and heat exchangers —
Existing digester boilers are out of compliance and need to be replaced immediately.
• Provide digester gas conditioning — H2S and siloxane removal systems will be provided
upstream of the boilers.
Phase 2
Key considerations are listed below for development of the design package and fee estimate. They
include upgrade of the WWTP with a state-of-the-art 9.5 mgd MBR system and necessary
improvements for reliability and redundancy.
1. Headworks
• Parshall Flume FIT-1102 will be replaced
• Replacement of raw sewage pumps nos. 1-3
• Design new gas detection system and alarms for MCC building
• Relocate air compressor in front of MCC enclosure
• Provide new biotrickling filter odor control system
• Provide two washer -compactors for screenings
• Provide two washer -classifiers for grit
• Provide SCADA interface for headworks equipment — see Section 13, Plant -wide I&C
and SCADA system.
• Replace old headworks motor control center (MCC) — see Section 14, Plant -wide
electrical system.
• Design new prefabricated building for MCC replacement
2. Primary Clarifiers and Primary Sludge Pump Station
• Replace collectors and drives for primary clarifiers nos. 1-3
12
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend. FY20-0080.docx.jn
• Design replacement of chain and flight mechanism for Clarifier No. 2Replace primary
sludge pumps nos. 1 and 2
• Replace all equipment powered by 240V to 480V power
• Design new ferric chloride dosing pumps for flow/load proportional control
• Design of new ferric chloride storage tank
• Provide recoating of concrete ferric chloride containment area
• Provisions for adequate ventilation to primary sludge pump room (6-12 ACH)
• Design SCADA interface for primary clarifiers and sludge pumps — see Section 13,
Plant -wide I&C and SCADA system.
• Replace MCC at primary sludge pump station — see Section 14, Plant -wide electrical
system.
• Design new prefabricated building for MCC replacement
3. Peak Ponds and Pump Station
• Evaluate and design mixing system for the Peak Ponds such as SolarBee® solar
powered floating mixing units in each pond to maintain a uniform mixture of contents
in the ponds.
• Peak Pond Pump Station (PPPS) capacity/performance will be evaluated. Peak
capacity with all 3 pumps operating (no standby) is 13.3 MGD. Additionally, the two
oldest PPPS pumps will be replaced with new pumps.
• Design proper pedestrian access (ingress/egress) to bottom of ponds
• Update pump station control strategy — see Section 13, Plant -wide I&C and SCADA
system. Add status and alarm signals to SCADA — see Section 13, Plant -wide I&C and
SCADA system.
• Replace MCC in peak pond pump station — see Section 14, Plant -wide electrical system
• Design new prefabricated building for MCC replacement
4. Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) and Aeration Basins
• Expand MBR capacity to 9.5 mgd
o Install additional membranes/cassettes
o Design modifications to membrane basins to hold preselected membranes in the
existing basins for up to 9.5 mgd annual dry weather flow (ADWF)
o Replace permeate pumps to support larger treated flows from MBR. Modify
existing backpulse pumps and permeate lines —MBR system has been sized to
handle 13.3 MGD peak flow with one train offline. MBR permeate pumps will
be sized to handle 13.3 MGD peak flow with 5 duty pumps (one standby pump).
Existing permeate lines will be checked to ensure they are adequate for future
flows. Due to higher peak flows, the existing permeate lines from membranes
to permeate pumps may need to be upsized.
Convert CAS aeration basins (3) to MBR aeration basins
o Provide new mixed liquor recycle (MLR) pumps and mixers
o Install/configure new baffles
o Upgrade RAS pumps to provide additional capacity for 9.5-mgd MBR
13
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend. FY20-0080.dou.jn
• Replace aeration blowers - Existing aeration blowers will be replaced with high-speed
Turbo blowers. In addition to this, Parsons will also evaluate and provide
recommendations for bearing type (air or magnetic).
• Replace aeration diffusers for all basins and design improvements to aeration control
system for energy efficiency — Parsons will investigate design solutions where aeration
diffusers can be replaced or taken offline for inspection and maintenance without taking
the aeration basin out of service.
• Replace piping for aeration blowers on the existing CAS train
• Provide new mud valves for aeration basins
• Provide HVAC improvements to aeration basin blower building
• Design code compliance upgrades to blower building and install panic bars on doors
• Equipment pad located in the northeast corner of the aeration basins has exposed
bottom of the concrete pad. Instructions will be provided in the design for the
contractor to fill in the footing cavity with concrete and construct concrete curb around
pad to shore the equipment pad.
5. Effluent Pump Station
• Replace effluent pump no. 3
• Provide a parallel pipeline to percolation ponds — see Sectionl5, Site Civil.
• Provide SCADA interface for process analyzers for effluent pu np station monitoring
and recording — see Section 13, Plant -wide I&C and SCADA system
• Replace MCC-F and MCC-G — see Section 14, Plant -wide electrical system Design
new prefabricated building for MCC replacement
6. Recycled Water Pump Station
• Replace recycled water pump no. 1
7. Impure Water Pumps
• The impure water pumps are located right below the chlorine contact tanks and provide
washwater for cleaning/spraying etc. In the future, these pumps will also deliver water
for fine screens cleaning. Capacity of these pumps need to be evaluated to ensure future
requirements for washwater/fine screens cleaning etc. are met.
• Provide SCADA interface for impure water pumps — see Section 13, Plant -wide I&C
and SCADA system
8. Supernatant Ponds
• Replace MCC-Y — see Section 14, Plant -wide electrical system Improve struvite
management
o Provide a centrate equalization tank, pumping station, and glass -lined piping to
the Fine Screens.
9. Thickening System
• Replace thickened waste activated sludge (TWAS) pumps nos. 1-4
• Replace dissolved air floatation thickener (DAFT) recycle pump no. 1
14
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend. FY20-0080.docx.jn
• Design overhaul/replacement of internal mechanism for DAFT no. IProvide SCADA
interface for DAFTs — see Section 13, Plant -wide I&C and SCADA system Replace
MCC-D — see Section 14, Plant -wide electrical system
• Design new prefabricated building for MCC replacement
10. Digestion System
• Provide additional digestion capacity by construction of a new digester. Existing
secondary digester will continue to be used as a holding tank for storing sludge,
allowing the intermittent operation of dewatering centrifuges.
• Reline existing digesters
• Provide SCADA interface for digesters and upgrade digester feeding strategy — see
Section 13, Plant -wide I&C and SCADA system
11. Dewatering System
• Parsons will design a new silo and sludge conveyor system for transferring dewatered
sludge from the centrifuges for direct loading onto sludge hauling trailers/trucks.
• Replace dewatering sludge feed pump no. 1
• Replace dewatering grinder no. 1
• Replace small centrifuge to match large centrifuge capacity
• Provide SCADA interface for centrifuges — see Section 13, Plant -wide I&C and
SCADA system
12. Water Quality Laboratory — Improvements and Expansion
• To be determined from Water Quality Lab Study
13. Plant -Wide I&C and Scada System
• Following processes to be interfaced with plant SCADA:
o Headworks — bar screens and grit removal equipment
o Primary clarifiers and sludge pumps
o Fine Screens
o Primary and secondary digesters
o DAF thickeners
o Dewatering centrifuges
o Impure Water Pumps
o Waste Gas Flare
o Gas Conditioning System
• Following process areas status and alarms need to be displayed on plant SCADA:
o Fleadworks — raw sewage pumps high temperature alarms
o Peak pond pumps high temperature and seal leak alarms
o Aeration basin mixers run and fail status
o RAS & WAS pumps high temperature alarms and WAS pumps station level
switches (LSLL/LSHH)
o Secondary clarifiers pH analyzer
15
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend. FY20-0080.docx.jn
o Effluent pumps high temperature alarms
o Recycled water pumps high temperature alarms
o SCADA communication health
• Upgrade to latest Allen-Bradley ControlLogix 5580 controllers with built-in Ethernet
communications throughout the plant
• Convert PLC/SCADA communication network to Device Level Ring (DLR) topology
• Review and update missing calibration stickers on all instruments
• Optimize existing plant control strategies
• Update existing P&IDs for facilities being modified under the current scope of work
14. Plant -Wide Electrical System
• Replace switchboard "M" — Switchboard "M" installed in 1972 (almost 50 years ago)
provides power to key process areas such as return sludge pump station, headworks,
primary clarifiers, thickener building, digesters, DAF thickener, effluent pump station,
maintenance building, operations building and sludge pump station. Considering that
the typical useful life of a switchboard is up to 30 years, switchboard "M" has far
exceeded its useful life. Failure of Switchboard "M" will cause power disruption to
the majority of treatment plant process areas.
• Replace MCC-B, MCC-C, MCC -CA, MCC-D, MCC-E, MCC-F, and MCC-G and
MCC-Y
o MCC-C, MCC-D, MCC-E, MCC-F and MCC-G, installed in 1972
o MCC-B installed prior to 1961; replace existing 240V MCC with anew, 480V
MCC at a different location (outside of primary clarifier sludge pump room)
o MCC -CA and MCC-Y installed in 1988
• The following areas are non -compliant with NFPA 820 for electrical installation and
need to be changed:
o Headworks: The 10'-0" envelopment of influent channel is classified as Class
1 Division 2 area and "too close" to the electrical building with louvers and roll -
up door opening facing the influent channel. A new prefabricated enclosure for
the MCC will be designed — see Section 1, Headworks.
o Primary Clarifier Basins and Pumps: 18 inches above water surface and 10'-0"
beyond wetted wall is defined as Class 1 Division 2 area per NFPA 820.
Currently, electrical installations at basins and influent channels do not comply
with NEC requirements. Recommendations will be provided so that NEC
requirements can be met.
o Primary Clarifier Sludge Pump Room: Sludge Pump room is below grade with
MCC-B installed in the pump room. Existing room ventilation appears to be
provided by fan controlled by a timer. Area is classified as Class 1 Division 2
area with ventilation less than 6 air changes per hour. Provide continuous
ventilation per NFPA 820 to reduce the hazardous classification and replace
existing process equipment (240V) to match new MCC voltage (480V).
Primary Clarifier Sludge Pump Room: Replace existing process equipment (240V) to
match new MCC voltage (480 V)
16
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-OO80.docx.jn
• Evaluate critical process loads for standby generator and determine load shedding
strategy
15. Site Civil
• Site Civil work will include demolition, grading, yard piping
• Install new 6-foot-high chain link fence (perc ponds area)
• Provide new/redundant pipelines for key critical pipelines
o From headworks to primary clarifiers
o From primary clarifiers to peak ponds
o From aeration basins to membrane basins to accommodate increased flows to
the MBR process
o From effluent pump station to percolation ponds
o Others as determined in Task 1, Condition Assessment.
• New AC pavement for locations where new pipelines will be installed
16. Landscape Architecture
Landscaping design will include the property frontage along Nevada Street, the plant entrance,
the drive all the way past the Operations/Laboratory Building and employee parking to the
Maintenance Building, and the areas between the entrance drive and the plant access drive
north of the Chlorine Contact Tank Operations/Laboratory Building and employee parking.
Prepare preliminary design and initial concept ideas — Initial concept ideas will be
presented in blackline plan and elevations for City review. Upon receipt of initial City
feedback, we will refine our exhibits in color, with 3d modeled rendering exhibits
prepared for the entry monument, gate and beautification areas, informational exhibits,
as well as the walkway and patio improvement areas.
Prepare final design including demolition plans, construction plans and details, planting
plans and irrigation plans — Final design will entail the following:
o Demolition Plans
o Construction Plans & Details
o Planting Plans
o Irrigation Plans
17. Optional Items
• Develop demolition drawings for decommissioned fine screens equipment on the MBR
deck.
• Witnessing of factory acceptance testing of major equipment such as aeration blowers,
aeration diffusers, new centrifuge etc.
• Repair supernatant pond lining
3.1 Provide SRF Loan and Grant Applications Support
17
L:\ca\dim\Agreements\Parsons Water& Infrastructure First Amend. FY20-0080.docxJn
Phase 1
Parsons provided technical support for State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loans through State Water
Resources Control Board (SWRCB), as requested by the City.
The Project Report required for SRF loan was developed under Task 2 — Multipurpose Project
Report/Implementation Plan.
Phase 2
Provide technical support for SRF loan and available grants/incentives, on an as -needed basis up
to the amount shown in the fee estimate.
3.2 CEQA/EIR and NEPA Related Activities
Phase 1
The proposed design project is subject to CEQA requirements. The project was evaluated to
determine if it qualifies for an exemption from CEQA. Based on the Basis of Design (Bid Package)
proposed, very limited new construction will be included in the project. Therefore, earth work will
be minimal, which we believed will make the project qualify for a CEQA exemption.
In order to pursue an SRF loan or grant from the State Water Resources Control Board, in addition
to filing for CEQA exemption, the project must comply with certain National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) requirements. Parsons conducted and incorporated the results of the following
three technical studies required per NEPA, which were provided to the City to include as exhibits
to the SRF application:
• EPA Clean Air Act Conformity Analysis
® Biological Resources Evaluation (threatened and endangered species, wetlands)
• Archaeological and historic resources subject to National Historic Preservation Act Section
106 requirements.
During the course of the biological investigation, our team noted that the percolation ponds east of
the main wastewater treatment plant and Alabama Street are in a sensitive habitat area for some
small mammals. Burrows were found around the percolation ponds. This required small mammal
trapping activities to be conducted to confirm the presence of sensitive species including:
• The San Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR)
• LA pocket mouse
• Northwestern San Diego pocket mouse
Trapping activities were conducted, and SBKR were confirmed on the site. Our environmental
subconsultant also spotted red-tailed hawks in the area. The presence of SBKR and red-tailed hawks
required the CEQA-Plus process to switch from completing a Conditional Exemption (CE) to preparing an
Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND).
18
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-0080.docx.jn
Parsons conducted and incorporated the results of the following technical studies required per
NEPA into a draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND); these studies were
provided to the City for use as exhibits to the SRF application.
Phase 2
The draft IS/MND was completed but did not go through the environmental review process.
Parsons will review and revise the draft IS/MND to reflect the Phase 2 scope of work. At this time
the following modifications are anticipated,
1. Addition of pipeline between the effluent pump station and the percolation ponds.
2. Deletion of percolation ponds improvements from the project.
Proposed project changes will require amendments to the following technical studies:
o Biological Resources Evaluation (threatened and endangered species, wetlands)
o Archaeological and historic resources subject to National Historic Preservation Act Section
106 requirements
Upon revision of the IS/MND, Parsons will submit the document for City review and approval.
The IS/MND will then be circulated for a 30-day public review period (along with publication of
the Notice of Intent in the local newspaper), and responses to public comments on the document
will be prepared. As part of this task, Parsons will attend one Planning Commission and/or City
Council meeting and file the Notice of Completion with the County Clerk.
DELIVERABLES
TASK 3.2 DELfVE
4. Phase 1
• Conditional Exemption
• EPA Clean Air Act Conformity Analysis
• Biological Resources Evaluation (threatened and endangered species, wetlands)
• Archaeological and historic resources subject to National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 requirements.
• Small Mammal Trapping Report
+ Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND)
5.
6. Phase 2
• Amendment to the Biological Resources Evaluation (threatened and endangered species, wetlands)
• Amendment to the Archaeological and historic resources subject to National Historic Preservation Act Section 106
requirements
• Revised IS/MND, Draft and Final
• Responses to public comments to the IS/MND
7.
3.3 Conduct Utility Investigation
19
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-0080.docx.jn
Phase 2
Parsons will review the existing conditions of utilities serving the W WTP, including electric, gas,
water, and modem. If upgrades of certain utilities are warranted to meet the current WWTP
upgrade project needs, Parsons will coordinate with such utility companies and prepare an initial
request for utility information such as atlas sheets, mapping, or as -built plans, and will notify them
of the need to install planned facilities. If upgrade of utilities is required, Parsons will coordinate
with utility companies. Parsons will pothole up to 10 locations. Parsons will provide the appropriate
USA notifications and coordinate obtaining information from utility companies. The potholing
plan will be fully coordinated with and approved by the City before any field work.
3.4 Conduct Topographical Survey for Design
Phase 1
Parsons provided aerial and limited field topographic surveys, mapping, and utility research as
required for the project design for the wastewater treatment plant site and the percolation ponds
site. We established survey ground control and conducted a detailed topographic survey of the
project areas required for design completion. The survey and datum were tied into the state plane
coordinate system and City or County benchmarks. Additionally, existing survey data was
evaluated and any additional requirements were determined. Parsons reviewed existing survey data
and provided aerial and limited field topographic surveys, mapping, and utility research as required
for the project design. Parsons team established survey ground control and conducted detailed
topographic survey of the project areas required for design completion. The survey and datum
were tied into the state plane coordinate system and City or County benchmarks.
Phase 2
Parsons' surveying subconsultant will conduct aerial and topographic surveys between the
wastewater treatment plant area and the percolation ponds for purposes of adding a redundant
pipeline between the two. Parsons will coordinate surveying effort, review subconsultant
deliverables and provide comments, and incorporate survey information into design documents.
20
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water& Infrastructure First Amend. FV20-0080.docx.jn
DELIVERABLES
8. Phase 1
• Survey for the wastewater treatment plant site and percolation ponds
4.
10. Phase 2
• Survey for the pipeline alignment between the wastewater treatment plant site and the percolation ponds
11.
3.5 Conduct Geotechnical Investigations
Phase 1
Parsons subcontractor drilled two (2) soil borings in the digester area and one (1) soil boring in the
fine screens area at varying depths. Undisturbed ring samples of the subsurface materials were
obtained and tested in a soil laboratory to evaluate their physical characteristics and engineering
properties. A Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation Report was developed with
recommendations.
Phase 2
Parsons' geotechnical subconsultant will conduct geotechnical investigations and prepare a
geotechnical investigation report (GIR) for the proposed on -site facilities. The GIR will determine
the suitability of the sites to allow for construction of new facilities such as new pipelines, AC
pavements and new structures and provide design and construction recommendations for the
project facilities. The GIR will include as identified and recommended by the geotechnical
engineer associated with the proposed improvements:
• Necessary design and construction issues, including regional seismicity
• Site seismic parameters
• Groundwater presence and level
• Liquefaction
• Construction dewatering requirements (if applicable)
• Site preparation and earthwork, trenching, trench stability and excavation
• Shoring, bedding, backfill
• Excavatability of soils
• Suitability of excavated materials for backfill and compaction
• Anticipated settlement of foundations
• Bedding requirements
• Pavement section recommendations
• Soil bearing strength recommendations, etc.
1. Field exploration will consist of soil borings and cone penetration tests (CPT) at
approximately six locations, 20 to 50 feet below ground surface. Borings will be provided
21
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-0080.dccx,jn
at locations, intervals and depths sufficient to achieve the required information as necessary
for the design.
2. Pipeline between effluent pump station and percolation ponds is anticipated to be 10 to 30
feet below grade; borings will be drilled at approximately equal spacing along the
alignments of this pipeline. The borings along the pipeline alignment will be no less than
one field boring for each 1,000 feet of pipeline to a depth of minimum 3 feet below the
bottom of trench excavation.
3. Undisturbed ring samples of the subsurface materials will be obtained and tested in a soil
laboratory to evaluate their physical characteristics and engineering properties.
Parsons will coordinate geotechnical site investigations, review geotechnical report and other
subconsultant deliverables and provide comments and incorporate relevant geotechnical site
information for the design of various process areas, as applicable.
DELIVERABLES
12. Phase 1
• Geotechnical Investigation Report
13.
14. Phase 2
• Geotechnical Investigation Report
3.6 Prepare Preliminary Report
Phase 2
The following technical memoranda will be prepared and presented to the City for consideration
as they may impact the design scope for the Phase 2 project: Their accepted findings will be
incorporated into the preliminary design report.
• TM-1: Evaluate mixing capabilities of existing digesters - —The Parsons Process team will
evaluate the mixing systems of all primary and secondary digesters, and provide
recommendations for necessary improvements.
• TM-2: Investigate alternative, less expensive technologies for thickening to replace current
primary DAF thickener - Parsons will provide preliminary high-level screening of some
prominent thickening technologies in order to select the two most beneficial technologies.
These selected technologies will be then compared to DAY thickener through a life cycle
cost analysis.
• TM-3: Evaluate centrifuge capacity and redundancy - Parsons will evaluate the existing
dewatering equipment capacity and redundancy, using the design solids loads, and will
recommend the required upgrades.
• TM-4: Evaluate re -design of the dewatered sludge cake loading station and conveyance of
dewatered sludge - Parsons will evaluate the loading station based on the new solids truck
22
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-0080.docx.jn
dimensions and access requirements. Based on the results of evaluation, Parsons will
provide the City recommended modifications. Additionally, various methods for
conveying dewatered sludge onto the sludge hauling trucks/trailers will also be evaluated
and pros/cons of each method will be summarized in this memo.
• TM-S: Evaluate provisions for phosphorus removal — Centrate is currently sent to the degas
(supernatant) ponds, from where it is pumped to both CAS and MBR trains. FeC13 is added
to the MBR side which helps mitigate PO4levels to meet recycled water requirements. In
the future scenario of returning the centrate downstream of peak ponds, it will be important
to ensure phosphorus limits are in compliance with regulatory requirements. Since centrate
is high in phosphorus, there will be higher phosphorus concentrations in the liquid stream,
impacting effluent limits for recycled water. Parsons will evaluate the various alternatives
for potential sidestream treatment technologies.
• TM-6: Evaluate the effect of landfill leachate on the wastewater treatmentplantprocesses,
digested solids for beneficial reuse, recycled water, and alternative treatment of leachate
prior to entering the wastewater stream if needed - A small continuous flow of landfill
leachate is being accepted at the treatment plant (point of injection is downstream of grit
chambers). The State Water board has asked for effects of leachate on the various treatment
processes, impacts on recycled water and beneficial reuse of biosolids. A feasibility
study/evaluation will be conducted by Parsons to analyze impacts of constituents including
PFAS, metals and TDS on both liquids and solids treatment processes, as well as to develop
possible treatment alternatives. Coordination will also be conducted with the landfill to
explore the option of treating the leachate before it enters the treatment plant.
TM-7: Evaluate the feasibility of designing and installing recycled water storage tanks
(reservoirs) to meet growing demandfor recycled water —Parsons will evaluate conceptual
system configuration, storage tank sizing and location.
TM-8: Evaluate PAS/WAS pumps — Evaluate if existing recirculation/sludge wasting
pumps are adequate for converted aeration basins, to handle higher MLSS concentrations
of 8,000 mg/L. Addition of pumps may be required to handle larger treated flows from
MBR. Return flow of 3Q can be obtained with the existing pumps. However, for reduced
lifecycle costs, Suez has requested a return flow of 4Q, which will require additional
pumping capacity. Parsons will evaluate lifecycle costs of additional pumping, compare it
with the reduced lifecycle costs of MBR system, and provide necessary recommendations.
Draft technical memoranda will be presented to the City for review and comment. Comments will
be incorporated in the final technical memoranda for inclusion in the preliminary design report.
Once all comments are received regarding the draft technical memoranda, Parsons will prepare a
Preliminary Design Report (PDR) for the proposed improvements. The submittal will include the
following:
• Process calculations
• Process diagrams and control strategy descriptions
• Hydraulic calculations
• Preliminary site layouts
23
l:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend. FY20-OO80.docx.jn
• Motor list
• Single line diagrams
• Preliminary equipment selections and cut sheets
• Preliminary list of drawings
• Specification table of contents
• List of required permits, names of contact persons, telephone numbers, estimates of permit
fees, probable requirements, expected processing times, schedules for application and
receipt, and a plan for having the permit requirements met before project bid.
• Final Technical Memoranda Nos. 1 through 8.
The preliminary design report will be presented to the City in draft form. City comments will be
incorporated in the 30% design submittal.
DELIVERABLES
BASK 6 DELTV
M. Phase 2
• Draft Technical Memoranda Nos. 1 through 8
• Preliminary Design Report, Draft and Final (including final technical memoranda)
33 Prepare Final Design/Bid Documents and Construction Support
Phase 1 Accelerated Services
3.7.1 Final Design/Bid Documents
Parsons prepared draft and final sets of plans and specifications for the Phase IA and Phase 1B
submittals. City review comments to the draft submittal were incorporated in the final submittal.
Parsons held a review workshop with the City for the draft Phase 1 B package. Parsons is providing
support to the City for all relevant permitting as required through the design process. Parsons
provided all plans, specifications and estimates in electronic format (AutoCAD 2D, Word, Excel,
etc.).
3.7.2 Bid Phase Services and Engineering Services during Construction
Bid Phase Services:
• Attended Pre -Bid meeting and site walk.
• Requests for Infonnation (RFIs) received and reviewed Contractor's RFIs during the Bid Phase
to determine if responses are required.
• Addenda prepare three (3) addenda to provide responses to Bid Phase RFIs.
Engineering Services during Construction: Parsons continues to provide support through construction of
Phase 1B.
24
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-0080.docxJn
• Review and Approve Contractor Submittals (Shop Drawings, Cut Sheets, Manuals, Vendor Tests,
Certifications, and Reports) — Catalog information, review and process submittals electronically.
o Assumed number of anticipated submittals as twenty (20).
o Assumed number of anticipated resubmittals as ten (10).
• Respond to Requests for Information (RFIs) — Respond to Contractor's RFIs electronically for all
documentation.
o Assume number of anticipated RFIs as twenty-five (25).
• Review of Construction Change Order Requests - Coordinate with the City to review Contractor's
change order requests or develop City -initiated change order requests.
c Assume two (2) anticipated change order requests.
• Design Modifications — Provide design modifications as needed to address RFIs and change order
requests.
• Construction Visits by Design Staff. Provide up to 10 visits from design staff to review construction
progress/installation of equipment provided by the City.
• Provide Field Testing and Start-up Assistance. Provide written start-up protocol and assistance with
process and facilities integration upon construction.
o Provide guidance and review of Contractor's step-by-step Shutdown/Tie-in plans.
o Provide guidance and review of Contractor's Start-up plans.
o Provide guidance and assistance during start-up of facilities, processes, and equipment.
• Update Existing Operations and Maintenance Manual. Provide updated operations and
maintenance (O&M) manual content in PDF format to replace existing manual MBR facility
content following the format of the existing (O&M) manual.
o Content on new fine screens, air scour blowers and digester boilers, heat exchangers and
gas conditioning will be included.
• Prepare Record Drawings. Prepare record drawings based on the as -built drawings and contractor -
provided redline drawings.
o As -built changes to be created in AutoCAD 2D
o Review the record drawings with the City before finalizing.
o Submit final record drawings electronically in AutoCAD and PDF format.
3.7.3 Construction Management Services
• Full-time Resident Engineering services (RE) can be provided to conduct inspections throughout
installation and start-up of the facility (assumed 180 days)
• Attend progress meetings during installation and start-up as needed.
• RE will provide preliminary review of submittals, RFIs, and other tasks as needed.
Phase 2 Services
3.7.4 Prepare 30% Design Submittal
Upon completion of the preliminary design, Parsons will submit a 30 percent design review
package to the City. The plans and specifications will reflect all applicable past input received
from the City. The submittal will include the following:
• Site plans
• Hydraulic profiles
• Structural plans for new structures
• Mechanical, HVAC and plumbing plans
25
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-0080.docx.jn
• P&IDs
• Single line diagrams and preliminary network architecture diagrams
• 30% construction cost estimate
Parsons will hold a 30% design workshop (refer to Subtask 5.5), document all discussions related
to design decisions made in the workshop, and enter this information into a decision log. Parsons
will submit the final PDR and 30 percent design package for review prior to the workshop.
3.7.5 Prepare 60% Design Submittal
Upon completion of the design to the 60 percent complete level, Parsons will submit a 60 percent
design review package to the City. The plans and specifications will reflect all applicable past
input received from the City. The submittal will include the following:
• Site plans
• Topographic survey base map
• Property description and plans for any right-of-way acquisition
• Pothole investigation report
• Preliminary geotechnical investigation report
• Structures plans and sections
• Mechanical, HVAC and plumbing plans and sections
• P&IDs and network architecture diagrams
• Single line diagrams
• Power plans
• Construction sequencing plan
• Equipment catalog cut sheets
Parsons will hold a 60% design workshop (refer to Subtask 5.5), document all discussions related
to design decisions made in the workshop, and enter this information into a decision log. Parsons
will submit the 60 percent design package for review prior to the workshop.
Parsons will hold an internal constructability workshop with members of our construction team to
review the design and solicit any recommendations to improve the constructability of the design.
The construction team will be given the 60 percent design package to review prior to the workshop.
Recommendations will be considered and implemented in the 90% design submittal as appropriate
3.7.6 Prepare 90% Design Submittal
Upon completion of the design to the 90 percent complete level, Parsons will submit a 90 percent
design review package to the City. The plans and specifications will reflect all applicable past
input received from the City. The submittal will include the following:
• Civil grading and paving plans, sections and details
• Civil yard piping plans, sections and details
26
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\ParsonsWater & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-0080.docx.jn
• Structural plans, sections and details
• Mechanical, HVAC and plumbing plans, sections, schedules and details
• P&IDs, Network architecture diagrams and I&C details
• Electrical single line diagrams, plans, control schematics, MCC elevations, panel
schedules, raceway and conduit schedules
• Edited City bid and front end documents
• Complete technical specifications
• Construction sequencing plan
• 90% construction cost estimate
Parsons will hold a 90% design workshop (refer to Subtask 5.5), document all discussions related
to design decisions made in the workshop, and enter this information into a decision log. Parsons
will submit the 90 percent design package for review prior to the workshop.
3.7.7 Prepare Final Design Submittal
Parsons will develop and submit the final submittal upon receipt of 90 percent review comments,
and this will include the following:
• Design drawings and technical specifications — Plans and specifications will be fully
checked and be ready to be advertised for construction bids. They will reflect all past City
input and will include contractual language and designs required to implement the
controlling agency permit requirements during construction.
• Final edited City bid and front end documents
• Final calculation package
• Final construction sequencing plan
DELIVERABLES
16. Phase 1
• Phase IA Bid Package, Draft and Final
• Phase LB Bid Package, Draft and Final
17.
18. Phase 2
• 30% Design Submittal
• 60% Design Submittal
• 90% Design Submittal
• Final Design Submittal
3.8 Prepare Construction Cost Estimates
27
L•\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-0080.docx.in
Phase 1
Parsons prepared conceptual engineer's estimates of construction costs for Phase IA and Phase
I packages in coordination with the City.
Phase 2
Parsons will prepare engineer's estimates of construction cost at key design milestones (30%,
90%,), to be based on relevant design documents. The cost estimates will be prepared by our cost
estimating group in accordance with the AACE International cost estimate classification system.
All costs will be in current dollars, referenced to the current Engineering News -Record (ENR)
Construction Cost Index (CCI), and escalated to the estimated midpoint of construction.
DELIVERABLES
19. Phase 1
Phase lA Conceptual Construction Cost Estimate
Phase 1B Conceptual Construction Cost Estimate
20.
21. Phase 2
• 30% Construction Cost Estimate
• 90% Construction Cost Estimate
3.9 Prepare Title 22 Report
Phase 2
Parsons will prepare a Title 22 Report describing the processes used at the plant facilities for
production of recycled water including redundancy and reliability features. The Title 22 Report
will describe how recycled water meeting the Title 22 requirements will be produced at the plant
and safety measures such as disposal of off -spec water in the event of equipment malfunction or
process inadequacies, which may result in the production of recycled water that does not meet the
Title 22 requirements. The Title 22 Report will be submitted to the State Water Resources Control
Board (S WRCB) — Division of Drinking Water (DDW), and RWQCB for review and approval.
DELIVERABLES
22. Title 22 Report, Draft and Final
TASK 3 ASSUMPTIONS
28
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & infrastructure First Amend.FY20-0080.docx.jn
• TM-2: The smaller centrifuge will be replaced to match the capacity of the existing larger
centrifuge — this assumption will be revisited depending upon the process evaluation during
the preliminary design stage.
• TM-3: Level of effort estimate includes evaluation of two beneficial technologies for solids
thickening. No design hours have been included for design of recommended technology.
• TM-4: A conveyor and storage silo have been included in the design — this assumption will
be revisited depending upon the process evaluation during the preliminary design stage.
• TM-5: Level of effort estimate includes evaluation of phosphorus removal technologies.
No design hours have been included for design of recommended phosphorus removal/
sidestream treatment technology.
• TM-6: No design hours have been included for design work related to landfill leachate
treatment.
• The City will provide review comments at the 30%, 60% and 90% design stages.
• Parsons will work with all relevant permitting agencies such as California State Water
Resources Control Board, South Coast Air Quality Management District etc., as required
through the design process and gain final approval for the final design submittal.
• Parsons will provide plans in AutoCAD 2D and PDF formats; specifications in Word and
PDF formats; and construction cost estimates in PDF format.
TASK 4 — PROJECT MANAGEMENT, COMMUNICATION AND QUALITY
CONTROL
4.1 Project Management and Prepare Project Management Plan
Parsons will develop a project management plan (PMP) to serve as a roadmap for the project from
facility assessment through construction and startup, identifying the sequence of activities and
including reviews and progress reporting. The PMP will address the project implementation
approach, staffing, organization, project recordkeeping, document control, quality control and
quality assurance responsibilities, and milestones including technical committee meetings and
schedule. A draft PMP will be presented during the kickoff meeting for the City's review and
comments.
Parsons will conduct project management activities throughout the duration of the project
including tracking scope, schedule and budget performance, staffing assignments, and internal
project team coordination.
• Prepare a project management plan (PMP)
• Conduct various project management activities throughout the duration of the project
including tracking scope, schedule, budget, staffing and internal project team coordination.
4.2 Conduct Project Kickoff Meeting
• Coordinate and attend project kickoff meeting with the City.
29
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend. FY20-0080.docxJn
Parsons will coordinate and attend a project kickoff meeting with the City. Our project manager
and task leaders will attend. Parsons will submit a detailed project schedule and agenda before the
meeting and submit the meeting minutes to the City within one week.
4.3 Coordinate Monthly Project Meetings and Biweekly Conference Calls
• Coordinate monthly project meetings with the City through the condition assessment and
design phases for the duration of the proposed project schedule.
• Conduct biweekly conference calls with the City staff during these phases for the duration
of the proposed project schedule.
Parsons will coordinate monthly project meetings and biweekly conference calls with the City.
Parsons' project manager, task leaders, and other key staff (as necessary) will attend monthly
project meetings to discuss the issues identified for the meeting. Parsons will prepare and submit
an agenda before each meeting and will prepare meeting minutes. Conference calls will be less
formal and will be between the City's and Parsons' project managers.
4.4 Provide Monthly Project Progress Reports
Parsons will submit monthly project progress reports, through condition assessment and design for
the duration of the proposed project schedule, summarizing the project's progress for the most
recent calendar month. They will include the following as a minimum:
o Summary of work completed by task
o List of proposed activities for the upcoming month
o List of pending information needed to support the planned activities for the upcoming
month
o List of out -of -scope items
o Percent complete/budget status summary
o Updated project schedule showing work completed through the reporting period
4.5 Conduct Condition Assessment and Design Submittal Review Workshops
• Conduct facility condition assessment review workshops for Phase 1 and Phase 2
• Conduct Phase 1 design submittal review workshops for draft submittals.
• Conduct Phase2 design submittal review workshops at 30% design, 60% design, 90%
design.
• Conduct Phase 2 constructability review workshop.
Parsons will prepare for, coordinate, and attend workshops to present key aspects of design to City
staff at each progress milestone to obtain feedback and direction to move forward. Workshops may
be scheduled adjacent to monthly project coordination meetings or any other meetings between
City staff and Parsons' team. Parsons will submit an agenda before the meeting and submit minutes
of the workshop to the City within one week.
30
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water& Infrastructure First Amend. FV20-0080.docxJn
4.6 Provide Quality Control
• Implement quality management throughout the duration of the project.
Parsons will implement its proven Total Quality Management practice for scope, task, and
schedule management to ensure that the deliverables meet Parsons' established QA/QC
procedures. Quality management will be implemented throughout the duration of the project.
TASK 4 ASSUMPTIONS
1. Phase 2 will include an eight -month condition assessment/facility evaluation.
2. Phase 2 will include a 17-month design period overlapping with condition
assessment/facility evaluation
DELIVERABLES
ASK 4,DELIVERAB.LES
• PMP, Draft and Updates
• Kickoff Meeting Agenda and Minutes
• Monthly Meeting Agendas and Minutes (7)
• Monthly Progress Reports (12)
• Workshop Agendas and Minutes (5)
31
L\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-0080.docx.jn
EXHIBIT "2"
AMENDED PROJECT SCHEDULE
32
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend. FY20-0080.docx.jn
�
�
Mill
I
Ii
I
�
�
:
\
\
2 '
|
§
i
�
E
&
$
f�aa{/R�£
�
efeR
I
\kk)79§i279/§2/�/
9E.9
g=��
==�mr��m�s
2daa
33
Eye lma e_ \Prso e Water &I+mmaure nm Amend. R20-008&do a
EXHIBIT "Y
AMENDED COST PROPOSAL
34
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-008O.docx.jn
loll
I
loll
loll
i
MEMOIR
Emu
0111111111,411
Non
.
III
IN
35
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend. FY20-0080.docx.jn
aI�Mfilllwllomll
-
MON
L:\ca\djm\Agreements\Parsons Water & Infrastructure First Amend.FY20-0080.docx.jn