Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Minutes 08-14-07_CCv0001.pdf MINUTES: of the Planning Commission Meeting of the City of Redlands held Tuesday, August 14, 2007, at 2:00 p.m. are as follows: PRESENT: James Macdonald, Chairman Ruth Cook, Commissioner Carol Dyer, Commissioner Paul Foster, Commissioner John James, Commissioner Eric Shamp, Commissioner ADVISORY STAFF Jeffrey Shaw, Director PRESENT: Robert Dalquest, Assistant Director Michael Reiter, Assistant City Attorney Manuel Baeza, Senior Planner David Jump, Associate Planner Tamara Alaniz, Associate Planner I. CALL TO ORDER AND PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD - 3 MINUTES Chairman Macdonald called the meeting to order. All Commissioners were present with the exception of Commissioner Miller. II. CONSENT CALENDAR A. REDLANDS CYPRESS VILLAS, LP., APPLICANT (PROJECT PLANNER: TAMARA ALANIZ) 1. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 16610 (TIME EXTENSION) - Planning Commission to consider a request for an Extension of Time for an approved tentative tract map to merge five (5) parcels into one parcel totaling 4.79 acres located on the north side of Cypress Avenue, least of Hibiscus Drive in the R-2-2000 (Multiple Family Residential) District. B. ABCO REALTY AND INVESTMENTS, INC., APPLICANT (PROJECT PLANNER: MANUEL BAEZA) 1. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 17253 (TIME EXTENSION) - Planning Commission to consider a request for an Extension of Time for an approved tentative tract map for a thirty-seven (37) unit condominium development on 2.56 acres located on the southwest corner of Lugonia Avenue and Church Street in the R-2, Multiple Family Residential District. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner James, seconded by Commissioner Foster, and carried on a 6-0 vote to approve the Consent Calendar. III. OLD BUSINESS A. LOVE ROCK MINISTRIES, APPLICANT (PROJECT PLANNER: MANUEL BAEZA) 1. Planning Commission to consider a Mitigated Negative Declaration. 2. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider a Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study. Planning Commission Minutes of August 14, 2007 Pagel 3. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 894 - A Conditional Use Permit to establish a place of worship in an existing house located at 1205 West Crescent Avenue (Burrage Mansion Estate) in the R-E, Residential Estate District. 4. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 305 (Parcel Map No. 17895) - A Minor Subdivision subdividing 17.83 gross acres into 4 lots for property located at 1205 West Crescent Avenue (Burrage Mansion Estate) in the R-E, Residential Estate District. Chairman Macdonald opened the public hearing. Project Planner Manuel Baeza indicated that this project was continued from the meeting of July 24, 2007 due to a number of changes that needed to be addressed. Mr. Baeza stated that the applicant has asked for a continuance to the September 25, 2007 meeting. Mr. Beaza indicated that the applicants have waived their CEQA time limit rights for processing. Mr. Baeza stated that staff has received letters and e- mails indicating opposition to the project which have been provided to the Commission for their review. Bernard Szukalski, 1224 Mira Monte Drive, voiced concerns relative to events such as wedding receptions and conferences taking place on the property and indicated that these types of activities are inappropriate for a quiet and well established historic neighborhood. Susan Pyle, 1230 Mira Monte Drive, commented on other options that should be explored for the property that would ensure that the Burrage Mansion would remain as a historic resource. Ms. Pyle stated that she and the surrounding neighboring residents are requesting that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) be submitted relative to the proposed use of the property. Chairman Macdonald closed the public hearing. Chairman Macdonald opened the public hearing. Sharon Rushing, 1038 West Highland Avenue, commented that the proposed project was inconsistent with the surrounding use and sets precedence for similar issues. Ms. Rushing requested an Environmental Impact Report that would address traffic, rain and storm runoff, and lighting issues. Linda Anderson, 1225 Monte Vista Drive, had concerns relative to the noise that could result from the proposed project. Chairman Macdonald closed the public hearing. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Foster, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission continue the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Public Hearings for the Socio- Economic Cost/Benefit Study, Minor Subdivision No. 305 and Conditional Use Permit No. 894 to September 25, 2007. Commissioner Dyer requested that staff provide a chart in the future staff report that addresses the limitations relative to Kimberly Crest and EI Carmelo Retreat with regard to alcohol use, noise, hours, parking and access restrictions and types of functions that are allowed. She also requested a comparison of the prior projects requirements for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) versus the current project being evaluated under a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Planning Commission Minutes of August 14, 2007 Page 2 IV. NEW BUSINESS A. PGP PARTNERS, INC., APPLICANT (PROJECT PLANNER: MANUEL BAEZA) 1. COMMISSION SIGN REVIEW NO. 325 - Planning Commission to consider Commission Sign Review for a sign program for a six (6) building industrial park located on the east side of Mountain View Avenue, and the south side of Almond Avenue in the Concept Plan No. 1, Commercial Industrial District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan. 2. COMMISSION SIGN REVIEW NO. 326 - Planning Commission to consider for a Commission Sign Review for two (2) center identification monument signs for a six building industrial park located on the east side of Mountain View Avenue, and the south side of Almond Avenue in the Concept Plan No. 1, Commercial Industrial District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan. 3. COMMISSION SIGN REVIEW NO. 327 - Planning Commission to consider for a Commission Sign Review for two (2) monument signs for a six building industrial park located on the east side of Mountain View Avenue, and the south side of Almond Avenue in the Concept Plan No. 1, Commercial Industrial District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan. Project Planner Manuel Baeza gave a PowerPoint presentation and overview of the proposed project. Staff recommended approval of the proposed sign programs subject to the conditions of approval. Chairman Macdonald asked about Commission Sign Review No. 327 that is shown on the agenda. Mr. Baeza indicated that Commission Sign Review No. 327 was withdrawn. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Dyer, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission approve Commission Sign Review No. 325 and 326 subject to the Conditions of Approval. B. REDLANDS CENTER LLC, APPLICANT (PROJECT PLANNER: DAVID JUMP) 1. Planning Commission to consider a Mitigated Negative Declaration. 2. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider a Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study. 3. Consideration of Commission Review and Approval No. 838 to develop a commercial retail center consisting of an in-line set of retail businesses and one free standing restaurant with a combined floor area of 51,101 square feet on approximately 4.79 acres, located south of Interstate 10 Freeway on the west side of California Street in the EV/CG, General Commercial District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan. 4. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider Conditional Use Permit No. 893 to establish a drive-thru food establishment within a proposed retail center located south of Interstate 10 Freeway on the west side of California Street in the EV/CG, General Commercial District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan. Planning Commission Minutes of August 14, 2007 Page 3 Chairman Macdonald opened the public hearing. Project Planner David Jump indicated that the applicant is requesting a continuance on this item so that they can make design changes relative to the entrances and exits to the site as well enhancing the landscaping plan. Mr. Jump requested a continuance to the September 11, 2007 meeting. Bob Best, owner of a property adjacent to the proposed project, indicated that his property is currently land-locked and spoke about the possibility of having access over the railroad tracks. Director Shaw indicated that he would speak with Mr. Best directly although his request did not relate specifically to the proposed project other than the potential for access to his property. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Shamp, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission continue the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study, Commission Review and Approval No. 838 and Conditional Use Permit No. 893 to September 11, 2007. Director Shaw informed the Planning Commission that Project Planner David Jump had accepted a position as Associate Planner with the City of Cathedral City. C. STOR-N-LOCK, APPLICANT (PROJECT PLANNER: TAMARA ALANIZ) 1. Planning Commission to consider a recommendation to the City Council on a Mitigated Negative Declaration. 2. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider a recommendation to the City Council on a Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study. 3. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider a recommendation to the City Council on Zone Change No. 432, to pre-zone four (4) contiguous assessor parcels in the unincorporated area of San Bernardino County to the City of Redlands M-1, Light Industrial District, on approximately 10.84 acres located on the southeast corner of Wabash Avenue and Nice Avenue (APN: 0298-062-01, 0298-061-14, 0298-061-20, and 0298-061-21). 4. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider a recommendation to the City Council on Annexation No. 89, an annexation for four (4) contiguous assessor parcels tota110.84 acres and contiguous San Bernardino County right- of-way totaling approximately 1.76 acres in the unincorporated area of San Bernardino County located on the southeast corner of Wabash Avenue and Nice Avenue (APN: 0298-062-01, 0298-061-14, 0298-061-20, and 0298-061-21). 5. Planning Commission consideration of Commission Review and Approval No. 854, a request to construct a 68,314 square foot self storage facility with associated parking and landscape areas on 3.02 acres located on the east side of Wabash Avenue, approximately 315 feet south of Nice Avenue. Chairman Macdonald opened the public hearing. Project Planner Tamara Alaniz gave a PowerPoint presentation and overview of the proposed project. Staff recommended approval of Zone Change No. 432 and Annexation No. 89 to the City Council and continue Commission Review and Approval to the meeting of October 23, 2007. Planning Commission Minutes of August 14, 2007 Page 4 Commissioner Dyer commented on the lack of the detailed architecture and landscaping that would be visible from the street. Ms Alaniz addressed Ms. Dyer's concerns. Commissioner Shamp asked if there were any plans for the use of the former railroad right-a-way. Director Shaw indicated that the property is owned by SANBAG and that the railroad right-a-way would be the alignment of the Orange Blossom Trail. Chairman Macdonald asked if the Orange Blossom Trail would be along the block wall on the east elevation and if there would be a possibility of requiring the planting of vines along the wall as a condition of approval. Director Shaw indicated that alternatives could be explored when the Commission Review and Approval comes back to the Commission in October. Commissioner James indicated that he was not supportive of the proposed architecture and would like to see changes to the drawings and architecture prior to the October 23, 2007 meeting. He stated that he would like to see architecture that would be more consistent with the Ron Simus project that would blend in with area. Commissioner Dyer had concerns with the landscaping indicating that the materials were too small and needed to be substantially upgraded. Frank McCullough, Stor-N-Lock Self Storage, commented on the conditions of approval requested by staff. He indicated that they would reduce the building size by eliminating the building that is in the center towards the back of the site and would widen the building next to it. Mr. McCullough indicated that they would make the necessary requested adjustments to the landscaping and would work with staff to come to an agreement relative to acceptable graffiti abatement on the walls. They would be happy to consider a trail along the east wall. Commissioner Cook asked what color the doors would be along the Wabash frontage. Mr. McCullough indicated that the doors are actually stucco insets that would have trellis work inside with plantings. Commissioner Shamp stated that he had concerns relative to the paving and roofing and would like to see more shade trees. Mr. McCullough indicated that the paving would be asphalt and the roof would be composed of a reflective steel material. Commissioner Shamp indicated that he preferred concrete paving versus asphalt and would like to see a white steel roof installed that would mitigate the heat and energy efficiencies. Mr. McCullough stated that he would check with his architect for the cost of the white roof and would consider it. Commissioner Cook had concerns that the long fence on the south and east side of the site would be subject to graffiti and recommended planting vines that would grow close to the wall. Chairman Macdonald asked for feedback relative the roofing material and installing concrete versus asphalt paving. Commissioners Cook and Shamp indicated that they preferred the white metal roof. Commissioner Shamp indicated that he preferred concrete paving. Chairman Macdonald asked for feedback relative to planting vines along the south and east walls. Commissioner James indicated that the vines would be appropriate but would like drawings updated and the recommendations that were made today brought back when the Commission Review and Approval comes before the Commission in October. Commissioner Dyer indicated that she would like to see something more to breakup the walls. Planning Commission Minutes of August 14, 2007 Page 5 Commissioner Shamp stated that he would like to see a more sophisticated treatment to the wall on the east elevation facing the trail. Commissioner Cook indicated that she would like to see vines planted to mitigate the graffiti. Commissioner James concurred with Commissioner Cook. Commissioner Foster stated that he had no objection with the project but would like to see something similar to the Ron Simus project. Commissioner Shamp indicated that he had concerns relative to the architectural style, the proportion, the detailing, the mock storage doors and the inexpensive looking second story windows. Chairman Macdonald closed the public hearing. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner James, seconded by Commissioner Cook, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Zone Change No. 432, Annexation No. 89 and Commission Review and Approval No. 854 and direct staff to file and post a `Notice of Determination' in accordance with City guidelines. It is recommended that this project will individually or cumulatively affect wildlife resources as defined in Section 711.2 of the California Fish and Game Code and the California Department of Fish and Game fee shall be paid. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner James, seconded by Commissioner Cook, and carried on a 6-0 vote the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council on the Socio-Economic Cost Benefit Study for Zone Change No. 432, Annexation No. 89 and Commission Review and Approval No. 854, as it has been determined that this project will not create unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services in the community, and no additional information or evaluation is needed. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner James, seconded by Commissioner Cook, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Planning Commission Resolution No. 1142, recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change No. 432, pre-zoning four (4) contiguous assessor parcels in the unincorporated area of San Bernardino County to the City of Redlands M-1, Light Industrial District, on approximately 10.84 acres located on the southeast corner of Wabash Avenue and Nice Avenue. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner James, seconded by Commissioner Cook, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Planning Commission Resolution No. 1143, recommending to the City Council approval of Annexation No. 89, to incorporate four (4) contiguous assessor parcels totaling 10.84 acres and contiguous San Bernardino County right-of-way totaling approximately 1.76 acres in the unincorporated area of San Bernardino County located on the southeast corner of Wabash Avenue and Nice Avenue. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner James, seconded by Commissioner Cook, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission continue Commission Review and Approval No. 854 to the October 23, 2007 Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission Minutes of August 14, 2007 Page 6 D. DEREK AND CYNTHIA PEEL, APPLICANT (PROJECT PLANNER: TAMARA ALANIZ) 1. Planning Commission to consider a recommendation to the City Council on a Mitigated Negative Declaration. 2. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider a recommendation to the City Council on a Socio-Economic Cost Benefit Study. 3. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider a recommendation to the City Council on AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE REMOVAL NO. 117 on approximately 4.64 acres located on the north side of San Bernardino Avenue at 1305 East San Bernardino Avenue in the A-1, Agricultural District. 4. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider a recommendation to the City Council on ZONE CHANGE NO. 431 from A-1, Agricultural District to R-E, Residential Estate District on approximately 4.64 acres located on the north side of San Bernardino Avenue at 1305 East San Bernardino Avenue. 5. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider a recommendation to the City Council on MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 315 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 18486) to subdivide approximately 4.64 acres into two (2) lots located on the north side of San Bernardino Avenue at 1305 East San Bernardino Avenue. Chairman Macdonald opened the public hearing. Project Planner Tamara Alaniz gave a PowerPoint presentation and overview of the proposed project. Staff recommended approval of the proposed project subject to the conditions of approval. Cynthia Peel, applicant, indicated that she was available to answer questions. Ms. Peel had several questions relative to several of the conditions of approval. Ms. Alaniz addressed Ms. Peel's questions. Chairman Macdonald closed the public hearing. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Foster, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council on the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Agricultural Preserve Removal No. 117, Zone Change No. 431 and Minor Subdivision No. 315 and direct staff to file and post a `Notice of Determination' in accordance with City guidelines. It is recommended that this project will individually or cumulatively affect wildlife resources as defined in Section 711.2 of the California Fish and Game Code and the California Department of Fish and Game fee shall be paid. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Foster, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried on a 6-0 that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council on the Socio-Economic Cost Benefit Study for Minor Subdivision No. 315, as it has been determined that this project will not create unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services in the community, and no additional information or evaluation is needed. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Foster, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Planning Commission Resolution No. 1144, recommending Planning Commission Minutes of August 14, 2007 Page 7 to the City Council approval of Agricultural Preserve Removal No. 117, removing the agricultural preserve designation of the subject property on 4.57 acres at 1305 East San Bernardino Avenue (APN: 0168-061- 14). MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Foster, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Planning Commission Resolution No. 1145, recommending to the City Council approval of Zone Change No. 431, changing the designation of the subject property from A-1, Agricultural District, to R-E, Residential Estate District on 4.57 acres at 1305 East San Bernardino Avenue. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Foster, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council on Tentative Parcel Map No. 18486 subject to conditions of approval, and based upon the following findings: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the City's General Plan and Municipal Code. The project has a General Plan land use designation of Very Low Density Residential and a zoning of R-E, Residential Estate District, currently providing .21 units to the acre and allowing only one single- family residential unit per lot which is consistent with both the General Plan and Municipal Code; 2. The site is physically suitable for the type of development. The site is large enough to subdivide into two (2) lots and conforms to lot development standards for the R-E, Residential Estate District of the Municipal Code; 3. The site will be physically suitable for the residential development. The General Plan Land Use Designation of Low-Density Residential, and R-E, Residential Estate District zoning both allow future residential development in accordance with specified development standards and improvements; 4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The subject site is not identified as being within an area containing biological resources or within a wildlife corridor; 5. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. This is a residential project and is not likely to cause any serious public health problems, such as those associated with hazard emissions or dangerous features, and no construction is proposed at this time; 6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; and, 7. That pursuant to California Government Code Section 66474.4, of the Subdivision Map Act the land is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The property is not in an agricultural preserve. Chairman Macdonald recessed the meeting at 3:52 p.m. Chairman Macdonald reconvened the meeting at 4:00 p.m. Planning Commission Minutes of August 14, 2007 Page 8 E. SHERYL BRUZSKA, APPLICANT (PROJECT PLANNER: TAMARA ALANIZ) 1. Planning Commission to consider a Mitigated Negative Declaration. 2. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider a Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study. 3. Consideration of COMMISSION REVIEW AND APPROVAL NO. 850 for the construction of a one-story, 7,000 square foot office building, associated parking areas and landscape elements on 0.55 acres, located on the north side of Brookside Avenue at 708 Brookside Avenue in the A-P, Administrative and Professional Office District. Chairman Macdonald opened the public hearing. Project Planner Tamara Alaniz gave a PowerPoint presentation and overview of the proposed project. Staff recommended approval of the proposed project subject to the conditions of approval. Sheryl Brzuski, Applicant, and Rudy Lazano, Project Architect, indicated that she was available to answer questions. Commissioner Dyer stated that there needs to be a walkway or pedestrian access that would allow people to go in between the two lots if the other parking lot is being used for patrons. Ms. Brzuski concurred with Commissioner Dyer. Commissioner Dyer indicated that she supported staff's concern relative to the lack of contrast in color between the two stucco buildings. Commissioner Cook had concerns with the appearance of the front of the proposed building and would like to see more enhancements relative to the architecture and landscaping. Commissioner Shamp had reservations relative to the architectural style of the building and indicated that it is lacking in design and needs more enhancements. Commissioner Dyer commented on the orientation of the building indicating that there is not an entrance on the front of the building facing Brookside Avenue. Commissioner Shamp concurred with Commissioner Dyer indicating that it may be as simple as taking the one unit at the end and turning it to face the street and detailing it accordingly. Mr. Lazano commented on several architectural changes that could be made such as breaking up the long horizontal element, extending the elevation in height to give the building a more vertical appearance, and extending the design element on the portion of the rear of the building that fronts Brookside Avenue. Commissioner Dyer indicated that a condition of approval should be added requiring an automatic irrigation system and commented on several landscaping trees that should be used. Director Shaw asked the applicant how long it would take to bring back revised plans. Mr. Lazano indicated that revised plans could be completed in two weeks. Director Shaw recommended a thirty (30) day continuance. Ms. Brzuska asked if the project could be scheduled for the September 11, 2007 meeting. Director Shaw indicated the project could be scheduled for the September 11, 2007 meeting if the plans were completed for staff's review in the next two weeks. Planning Commission Minutes of August 14, 2007 Page 9 Commissioner Shamp indicated that he would like to see the parapet height addressed at the next meeting. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner James, seconded by Commissioner Foster, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission continue the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the public hearing for the Socio- Economic Cost Benefit Study and the Commission Review and Approval to the September 11, 2007 meeting. F. TRINITY EVANGICAL FREE CHURCH, APPLICANT (PROJECT PLANNER: TAMARA ALANIZ) 1. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 541 (REVISION NO. 8) a revision to an existing Conditional Use Permit for the expansion of parking area at an existing religious institution located on an 18.9-acre site located at 1551 Reservoir Road in the R-E, Residential Estate District. Chairman Macdonald opened the public hearing. Project Planner Tamara Alaniz gave an overview of the proposed project. Staff recommended approval of the proposed project subject to the conditions of approval. Joe Bendarnan Bonadiman, Project Engineer, indicated that he was available for questions. Steve Springstead, Church Pastor, indicated that he was present to represent the Trinity Evangical Free Church. Chairman Macdonald closed the public hearing. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission determine that Conditional Use Permit No. 541, Revision No. 8 is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, under a Class 11 Categorical Exemption of Accessory Structures," and MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission approve Revision No. 8 to Conditional Use Permit No. 541, subject to the following findings, submitted plans, and attached conditions of approval: 1. The proposed church parking lot applied for at this location will not adversely affect the applicable land use plans of the City because it is a permitted use in the R-E, Residential Estate District, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit; 2. The proposed church parking lot will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare because its location will not interfere with vehicular or pedestrian movement, it is a conditionally permitted use within the zoning district and it will meet the applicable development standards of the zone; Planning Commission Minutes of August 14, 2007 Page 10 3. The proposed church parking lot will comply to the maximum extent feasible with the regulations of the City's General Plan, the applicable zoning district and the City's development standards because the proposed project meets the on-site parking requirements, is a permitted use with the approval of a conditional use permit and conditions of approval have been applied the project to ensure that development standards are met; and, 4. The church parking lot is appropriate at the proposed location in that the use is permitted with a conditional use permit within the R-E District, the applicant shall have adequate parking facilities, and the project will not create an adverse effect on surrounding properties. G. ON IOWA STREET, LLC, APPLICANT (PROJECT PLANNER: TAMARA ALANIZ) 1. Planning Commission to consider a Mitigated Negative Declaration. 2. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider a Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study. 3. Consideration of COMMISSION REVIEW AND APPROVAL 847 for the construction of a one-story, 59,168 square foot industrial warehouse complex with associated parking areas and landscape elements on the northeast corner of Iowa Street and Park Avenue in the EV/IC, Commercial Industrial District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan. 4. Consideration of COMMISSION REVIEW AND APPROVAL 848 for the construction of a one-story, 269,907 square foot industrial warehouse complex with associated parking areas and landscape elements on the southeast corner of Iowa Street and Park Avenue in the EV/IC, Commercial Industrial District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan. 5. PUBLIC HEARING for the Planning Commission to consider TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 18429, a subdivision of 20.62 acres into six (6) condominium lots on the northeast and southeast corners of Iowa Street and Park Avenue in the EV/IC, Commercial Industrial District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan. Chairman Macdonald opened the public hearing. Project Planner Tamara Alaniz gave a PowerPoint presentation and overview of the proposed project. Staff recommended approval of the project subject to the conditions of approval. Chairman Macdonald asked if there was a need for a Level of Service (LOS) motion for this development. Director Shaw indicated that the traffic study would need to be reviewed for the Level of Service finding. Commissioner Dyer indicated that additional landscaping is needed in front of building number four (4) and would like to see something in between the street trees on that site. She commented that thirty foot high trees are needed to bring them into scale with the size of the buildings. Mark Stanson, representing On Iowa Street LLC, was available for questions. Mr. Stanson indicated that they were in concurrence with adding a condition of approval requiring more landscaping. Chairman Macdonald commented that the colors shown on the material board and renderings did not match and asked which one was correct. Mr. Stanson indicated that the renderings showed the correct colors. Planning Commission Minutes of August 14, 2007 Page 11 Commissioner Dyer commented on the form liner and asked if it was a textured concrete. Rich Gardner, Project Architect, indicated that the form liner would either be corrugated or fluted. Director Shaw stated that the traffic study indicated that there is A.M. and P.M. peak hour additional trips to both Alabama Street and Redlands Boulevard and to California and Redlands Boulevard. Director Shaw indicated that he would provide the wording of the motion to the Commissioner reading the motions for this project. Commissioner Dyer asked Ms. Alaniz if she had composed a condition of approval relative to the landscaping. Ms. Alaniz read the conditions of approval relative to the landscaping. Commissioner Shamp commented on the corrugated/fluted form liner and indicated that if a fluted liner is chosen, that one is selected where the top surface slopes to prevent dust from accumulating. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Shamp, seconded by Commissioner Foster, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Tentative Parcel Map 18429 and Commission Review and Approval Nos. 847 and 848 and direct staff to file and post a "Notice of Determination" in accordance with City guidelines. It has been determined this project will individually or cumulatively affect wildlife resources as defined in Section 711.2 of the California Fish and Game Code and the California Department of Fish and Game fee shall be paid. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Shamp, seconded by Commissioner Foster, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission approve the Socio-Economic Cost Benefit Study for Tentative Parcel Map 18429 and Commission Review and Approval Nos. 847 and 848, as it has been determined that this project will not create unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services in the community, and no additional information or evaluation is needed. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Shamp, seconded by Commissioner Foster, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission approve a reduced LOS at the intersection of Alabama Street and Redlands Boulevard during the peak hours as permitted in General Plan policy 5.20 B and 5.20 C. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Shamp, seconded by Commissioner Foster, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission approve a reduced LOS at the intersection of California Street and Redlands Boulevard during the peak hours as permitted in General Plan policy 5.20 B and 5.20 C. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Shamp, seconded by Commissioner Foster, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 18429, subject to conditions of approval as amended, and based upon the following findings: 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the City's General Plan and Municipal Code, in that the project site has a General Plan land use designation of Commercial Industrial and a zoning of EV/IC, Commercial Industrial District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Planning Commission Minutes of August 14, 2007 Page 12 Plan and the proposed subdivision complies with the applicable development standards of the General Plan and Municipal Code; 2. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development. The site meets all development standards relating to height, size, and area and can accommodate the subdivision of interior airspace; 3. The site will be physically suitable for industrial warehouse and office support development. The development allows for two-way travel throughout the site, has sufficient emergency access with multiple ingress and egress points, off-site and right-of- way improvements have been conditioned to avoid future traffic impacts, and all Municipal Code development standards have been met; 4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project site is not identified as being within an area containing biological resources or within a wildlife corridor; 5. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. This is a warehouse with support office project and is not likely to cause any serious public health problems, as pedestrian access ways will be installed to avoid vehicular conflict, no offensive emissions or odors will be associated with the development, and associated noise will not affect surrounding properties because all uses will be conducted within an enclosed building; 6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; and, 7. That, pursuant to California Government Code Section 66474.4 of the Subdivision Map Act, the land is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The property is not in an agricultural preserve. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Shamp, seconded by Commissioner Foster, and carried on a 6-0 vote that the Planning Commission approve Commission Review and Approval Nos. 847 and 848 subject to conditions of approval as amended, and based upon the following findings: 1. The site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed warehouse and support office building and is designed to comply with all property development standards for the EV/IC zoning district including lot coverage, permitted uses, and required setbacks; 2. The site properly relates to Park Avenue and Iowa Street which are designed and improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic to be generated by the proposed development. Both streets will be constructed at city-prescribed standards to their ultimate half-widths through compliance with project conditions of approval and the applicant has been conditioned to perform other required street improvements, like widening and re-striping, which will accommodate traffic movement and flow; 3. The Conditions of Approval proposed for Commission Review and Approval Nos. 847 and 848 are necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare; 4. The use is desirable for the overall development of the community because the proposed project conforms with both the General Plan land use designation and Specific Planning Commission Minutes of August 14, 2007 Page 13 Plan requirements regarding site design and permitted uses within the zoning district and land use designation. This includes the addition of conditions of approval numbers forty eight (48), forty nine (49), and fifty (50) as follows: 48. The applicant shall substitute wrought iron fencing along the southern and southeastern property lines of Parcel 1 where a block wall is now proposed. The wrought iron fencing shall be landscaped with vines and/or other climbing plants to provide adequate site screening in this area. 49. The applicant shall provide additional trees within the extended, landscaped planters at the central drive aisle of Buildings 5 that adequately screen the truck loading docks from Park Avenue. 50. The applicant shall provide more parking lot trees at a minimum rate of one tree per three parking spaces along the north frontage of Building Nos. 4, along the north side of the lot 4 parking area, and along the south side of lots 5 and 6 parking areas. V. ADDENDA- None VI. MINUTES A. JULY 24, 2007 MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Foster, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried on a 6-0 vote to approve the minutes of July 24, 2007. VII. LAND USE AND CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS OF AUGUST 7, 2007 Director Shaw gave a brief presentation on the City Council Actions of August 7, 2007. VIII. ADJOURN TO SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 Chairman Macdonald adjourned the meeting at 5:05 p.m. to September 11, 2007. Christine Szilva Jeffrey L. Shaw, Director Senior Administrative Assistant Community Development Department Planning Commission Minutes of August 14, 2007 Page 14 Planning Commission Minutes of July 24, 2007 Page 15