HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Minutes 6-9-09_CCv0001.pdf MINUTES: of the Planning Commission Meeting of the City of Redlands held
Tuesday, June 9, 2009, at 2:00 p.m. are as follows:
PRESENT: Paul Foster, Chairman
Gary Miller, Vice Chairman
Jim Macdonald, Commissioner
Ruth Cook, Commissioner
John James, Commissioner
Carol Dyer, Commissioner
Eric Shamp, Commissioner
ADVISORY STAFF Robert Dalquest, Assistant Director
PRESENT: Dan McHugh, City Attorney
Manuel Baeza, Principal Planner
Tabitha Kevari, Associate Planner
Sergio Madera, Associate Planner
Chris Boatman, Assistant Planner
I. CALL TO ORDER AND PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD - 3 MINUTES
Chairman Foster called the meeting to order. All Commissioners were present.
II. CONSENT ITEMS
A. TACO JIM, APPLICANT
(PROJECT PLANNER: TABITHA KEVARI)
Consideration of COMMISSION SIGN REVIEW NO. 366 to construct a pedestal
sign that is twelve (12) feet in height with a sign area of twenty (20) square feet
for the Taco Bell Restaurant located at 1225 West Colton Avenue in the C-M,
Commercial Industrial District.
Chairman Foster pulled Commission Sign Review No. 366 for discussion.
Project Planner Tabitha Kevari gave a brief presentation of the proposed Commission Sign
Review. Staff recommended approval of Commission Sign Review No. 366 subject to the
Conditions of Approval listed in the staff report.
Commissioner Dyer expressed concern regarding the proposed pedestal sign. Commissioner
Dyer stated the majority of signage in the area are monument signs, with the exception of
Dynasty Suites. Commissioner Dyer declared a pedestal sign was uncharacteristic for the area.
Commissioner Dyer recommended a revision to the proposed cabinet colors.
Commissioner Macdonald concurred with Commissioner Dyer's comments. Commissioner
Macdonald stated the Planning Commission preferred monument signs unless there are
extenuating circumstances.
Chairman Foster requested clarification on the intention a pedestal sign was proposed verses a
monument sign.
Planner Kevari stated it was the applicants desire to have a pedestal sign because of the visual
obstruction from the bus shelter, and staff agreed.
Chairman Foster opened up the Public Hearing.
Mr. Steve Folshim, representative, stated the pedestal sign was the best solution for visibility.
Assistant Director Community Development Robert Dalquest stated if the applicant refaced the
existing pedestal sign it would limit the building signage to a maximum of twenty-four (24) square
feet for each sign, as the existing pedestal sign is non-conforming due to its size, which puts the
applicant at a disadvantage.
Planning Commission Minutes of
June 9,2009
Page 1
Commissioner Shamp requested clarification regarding the location of the pedestal sign. Mr.
Folshim stated the applicant completed studies regarding the best location for visibility.
Commissioner Cook inquired why the applicant opposed to install a monument sign. Mr.
Folshim stated the applicant decided against a monument sign because it would only give one
direction of visibility, and with a pedestal the visibility is broader.
Commissioner Dyer stated there is an existing shade tree behind the bus structure which will be
an added obstruction. Mr. Folshim stated they plan to keep the tree trimmed, so the tree will not
cause an obstruction to the signage.
Commissioner Miller concurred with the previous comments of the Commissioners.
Commissioner Miller stated the traffic is not fast moving along Colton Avenue. Commissioner
Miller recommended placing the sign east or west of the bus structure.
Commissioner James recommended placing the sign on the westside of the property, so traffic
traveling eastbound will have visibility. Commissioner James stated a monument sign would be
more consistent with the area.
Chairman Foster closed the Public Hearing.
Chairman Foster stated he concurred with the majority of the Commissioners. Chairman Foster
confirmed monument signs are more consistent with the area, and recommended staff work with
the applicant and return to the commission for consideration on a monument sign.
City Attorney Dan McHugh stated if the applicant does not comply with the request of the
Planning Commission and returns with a pedestal sign the Planning Commission may possibly
recommend denial.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Macdonald, seconded by Commissioner Dyer and carried on a 7-
0 vote that the Planning Commission continue the Hearing on Commission Sign Review No. 366
to the meeting of June 23, 2009.
III. OLD BUSINESS
A. WAYNE JOHNSON, APPLICANT
(PROJECT PLANNER: CHRIS BOATMAN)
1. Consideration of a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
2. PUBLIC HEARING to consider a Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study.
3. PUBLIC HEARING for MINOR SUBDIVISION NO. 328 (Parcel Map No.
19102) for the subdivision of 2.08 acres into two lots located on Dwight
Street, approximately 500 feet west of Mariposa Drive in the R-A, Residential
Estate District.
Project Planner Chris Boatman gave a PowerPoint presentation and overview of the proposed
Minor Subdivision. Staff recommended approval of Minor Subdivision No. 328 subject to the
conditions listed in the staff report.
Commissioner Miller inquired if Planner Boatman had the surrounding lot dimensions. Planner
Boatman presented the parcel map with the property lines.
Chairman Foster opened the Public Hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes of
June 9,2009
Page 2
Mr. Bernie Mayer, representative, expressed concern regarding the undergrounding of the utility
poles running along the north property line. Mr. Mayer stated there are two (2) utility poles that
are set back from the road and screened by trees, and inquired if there was flexibility regarding
the undergrounding on the utility poles mentioned. Commissioner Dyer requested clarification
regarding the pad elevation. Mr. Mayer confirmed the lower elevation would accommodate the
garage, and the house would be constructed at the higher elevation.
Chairman Foster closed the Public Hearing.
Commission Miller stated Dwight Street is a fine example of estate homes and the proposed
project is not consistent with the surrounding properties. Commissioner Miller expressed concern
regarding the following;
❖ The extreme grading.
❖ Four hundred (400)feet of retaining walls.
❖ The upper home faces the rear of the property.
❖ Stepped pad elevations.
❖ The sloped conservation easement is isolated and of little value.
❖ Scarring of the land is not minimized.
❖ Steeper site with two (2) homes proposed verses existing sites which are flatter and have
only one (1) home.
❖ Maximum slope allowed for the guest parking structure area is usually fourteen (14)
percent, the applicant proposed a range from twelve point two (12.2) to fifteen (15)
percent for parking.
❖ The lower driveway pad is at nineteen (19) feet, and the next level up is thirty-seven (37)
feet.
Commissioner James concurred with Commissioner Miller's comments.
Commissioner Shamp stated the aesthetic impacts proposed are minimal and requested
clarification on the impacts with adjacent properties. Commissioner Shamp declared the
proposed project is a fairly dense hillside development and found the design compelling and
intriguing. Commissioner Shamp expressed concern regarding the storm water. Planner
Boatman stated a Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (W.Q.M.P.) was submitted and
indicated impacts were minimal to the Arroyo. Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director
Rosemary Hoerning stated there is a section where drainage comes to a point then drains into
the Arroyo with a small amount of Cubic Feet per Second (C.F.S.) associated with it, and is not a
significant amount from the proposed development. Director Hoerning stated a subdivision of ten
(10) lots or more would require a full W.Q.M.P.
Commissioner Dyer requested clarification on the location of the Arroyo relative to the site.
Planner Boatman clarified the location of the Arroyo. Commissioner Dyer expressed concern
regarding the grading and how it may disrupt the water supply which feed the trees along the
Arroyo, and their survival.
Commissioner Cook expressed concern regarding the cut and fill on the property.
Commissioner Macdonald stated the proposed use may not be the best use for the property.
Chairman Foster concurred with the majority of the commission, and did not feel the proposed
project was appropriate for the property. Chairman Foster recommended either a continuance to
consider the Planning Commissioners comments, or redesign, or motion to approve the proposed
project.
Commissioner Miller stated he is opposed to subdividing the property.
Chairman Foster re-opened the Public Hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes of
June 9,2009
Page 3
Mr. Mayer stated they would prefer a continuance to work with staff in order to refine a design
more desirable to the commission.
Chairman Foster closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner James and carried on a 7-0
vote that the Planning Commission continue the Hearing on the Mitigated Negative Declaration
for Minor Subdivision No. 328 to the meeting of July 14, 2009.
B. JUDSON HOMES LLC, APPLICANT
(PROJECT PLANNER: SERGIO MADERA)
1. Consideration of a recommendation to the City Council on a Mitigated
Negative Declaration.
2. PUBLIC HEARING to consider a recommendation to the City Council on
a Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study.
3. PUBLIC HEARING to consider a recommendation to the City Council on
AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE REMOVAL NO. 119 to remove the
Agricultural Preserve designation from approximately 19.92 acres
located north of San Bernardino Avenue, south of Pioneer Avenue, and
east of Judson Street.
4. PUBLIC HEARING to consider a recommendation to the City Council for
ZONE CHANGE NO. 437 to change the zoning designation from A-1,
Agricultural District to R-E, Residential Estate District for two parcels
totaling approximately 19.92 acres located north of San Bernardino
Avenue, south of Pioneer Avenue, and east of Judson Street.
5. PUBLIC HEARING to consider a recommendation to the City Council for
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 939 for a planned residential
development containing forty-one (41) single family residential lots
located on approximately 19.92 acres located north of San Bernardino
Avenue, south of Pioneer Avenue, and east of Judson Street in the A-1,
Agricultural District, (proposed change to R-E, Residential Estate
District).
6. PUBLIC HEARING to consider a recommendation to the City Council for
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18571 to subdivide approximately 19.92
acres into forty-one (41) lots for single family residential purposes and
five (5) lettered lots for open space purposes located north of San
Bernardino Avenue, south of Pioneer Avenue, and east of Judson Street
in the A-1, Agricultural District, (proposed change to R-E, Residential
Estate District).
Project Planner Sergio Madera gave an overview of the proposed project. Staff recommended
City Council deny Zone Change No. 437, Agricultural Preserve Removal No. 119, Conditional
Use Permit No. 939 and Tentative Tract Map No. 18571 subject to the conditions listed in the
staff report.
Chairman Foster opened up the Public Hearing.
Mr. Al Mozayeni, applicant, stated the precedence had been set by the Walton project. Mr.
Mozayeni stated they had the approval of the Airport Advisory Board.
Planning Commission Minutes of
June 9,2009
Page 4
Mr. Ron Klinkebiel, Airport Advisory Board, acknowledged the airport was vehemently opposed to
the proposed project, and there was no precedence set by the Walton project. Mr. Klinkebiel
stated the proposed project is closer to the runway which will have noise levels considerably
higher than the Walton project. Mr. Klinkebiel confirmed the airport concerns were; residential
complaints on noise, and developing curfews. Mr. Klinkebiel declared the Judson project
proposed is in a much worst location than the Walton project and stated the airport was not in
favor of the Walton project either.
Commissioner Miller inquired why the applicant stated they had numerous meetings with the
airport and were in favor of the development.
Mr. Klinkebiel stated he was not aware of whom they had meetings with. Mr. Klinkebiel confirmed
the entire Airport Advisory Board was opposed to the proposed project. Mr. Klinkebiel declared
the encroachment of residential development limits the viability of the airport as a twenty-four(24)
hour facility and needed to be operational for fire services, and airport expansion.
Commissioner Cook inquired if staff had received written documentation on the Airport Advisory
Boards opposition. Planner Madera confirmed staff had not received documentation.
Mr. Mozayeni stated their contact was Mr. Todd Housley, who is on the Airport Advisory Board.
Commissioner Dyer inquired if plans were submitted to City Departments for review and
comments. Assistant Director Dalquest stated plans are routed to City Departments and
confirmed there were no written comments submitted to staff. Assistant Director Dalquest
acknowledged when the proposed project was brought to the Environmental Review Committee a
representative from the Airport Advisory Board did oppose the project. Commissioner Dyer
requested clarification on the approval of the Walton project. Assistant Director Dalquest stated
there was a workshop conducted for the City Council with staff and the Airport Advisory Board,
regarding residential development encroaching toward the airport. Assistant Director Dalquest
said the workshop concluded that it was appropriate to develop and encroach around the airport
according to the General Plan and Airport Land Use Plan. Assistant Director Dalquest confirmed
the Planning Commission recommended denial on the Walton project, and then the project was
approved by the City Council.
Commissioner Miller stated in the event that Planning Commission denies the proposed project
and City Council approves the project, Commissioner Miller recommended the item brought back
to the Planning Commission to review the design of the proposed project
MOTION
Negative Declaration no action.
Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study no action.
It was moved by Commissioner Macdonald, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried on a
7-0 vote that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council deny Zone Change No.
437 because the Commission has determined that the increased residential density permitted by
the proposed Zone Change is not compatible with operations of the Redlands Municipal Airport,
which is proximate to the property that is the subject of this Zone Change."
Agricultural Preserve Removal
It was moved by Commissioner Macdonald, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried on a
7-0 vote that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council deny Agricultural
Preserve Removal No. 119 because the Commission has recommended denial of the
corresponding Zone Change.
Conditional Use Permit
It was moved by Commissioner Macdonald, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried on a
7-0 vote that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council deny Conditional Use
Permit No. 939, based upon the following findings:
Planning Commission Minutes of
June 9,2009
Page 5
A. That the proposed development will adversely affect the applicable land use plans of the
City, because the project is inconsistent with the Agricultural Preserve designation and
the A-1 Agricultural District zoning;
B. That the proposed development will not comply to the maximum extent feasible with the
regulations of the City's General Plan, the applicable A-1 zoning district and the City's
development standards for a Planned Residential Development because current
standards have not been applied to the project as follows:
1. The allowable density under the A-1 District is exceeded for the proposed
Tentative Tract 18571.
2. Proposed lot sizes are inconsistent with a PRD project in the A-1 District for the
proposed Tentative Tract 18571.
C. That the proposed development is not appropriate at the proposed location because the
Zoning District does not provide for the use of the property for residential uses at the
density that is proposed."
Tentative Tract Map
It was moved by Commissioner Macdonald, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried on a
7-0 vote that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council deny Tentative Tract No.
18571, based upon finding that:
A. That the proposed map is not consistent with the zoning of A-1, Agricultural District; in
addition the project does not meet the Planned Residential Development Ordinance of
the Municipal Code as follows:
1. The allowable density under the A-1 District is exceeded for the proposed
Tentative Tract 18571.
2. Proposed lot sizes are inconsistent with a PRD project in the A-1 District for the
proposed Tentative Tract 18571."
IV. NEW BUSINESS - NONE
V. ADDENDA
A. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
APPLICANT
(PROJECT PLANNER: MANUEL BAEZA)
Significant Project presentation to the Planning Commission on a proposal to
completely redevelop a 19-acre property containing an existing multiple family
development owned by the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino
located at the northeast corner of Lugonia Avenue and Orange Street in the R-1,
Single Family Residential District. The project entails the development of a new
planned residential development containing 228 multiple family and single family
dwelling units with landscaped open space areas and a recreation/administration
building. The development applications consist of a General Plan Amendment,
new Specific Plan, conditional use permit, tentative tract map and street
vacations.
Project Planner Manuel Baeza gave a brief overview of the proposed project and stated Mr. Pat
Meyer is representing the Housing Authority and has provided plans and will present the
proposed project. Planner Baeza stated the presentation is informational and no action is
required.
Planning Commission Minutes of
June 9,2009
Page 6
Mr. Pat Meyer, representative, gave a PowerPoint presentation and overview of the proposed
project.
VI. MINUTES
A. MAY 12, 2009
It was moved by Commissioner James, seconded by Commissioner Macdonald and carried on a
7-0 vote to approve the minutes of May 12, 2009 with corrections.
B. MAY 26, 2009
It was moved by Commissioner Macdonald, seconded by Commissioner James and carried on a
7-0 vote to approve the minutes of May 26, 2009 with corrections.
VII. LAND USE AND CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS OF JUNE 2, 2009.
Assistant Director Robert Dalquest reported that there were no land use actions at the City
Council meeting on June 2, 2009.
VIII. ADJOURN TO JUNE 23, 2009
Chairman Foster adjourned the meeting at 3:36 p.m. to June 23, 2009.
Linda McCasland Robert Dalquest, Assistant Director
Administrative Secretary Community Development Department
Planning Commission Minutes of
June 9,2009
Page 7