HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Minutes 11-10-09_CCv0001.pdf MINUTES: of the Planning Commission Meeting of the City of Redlands held
Tuesday, November 10, 2009, at 2:00 p.m. are as follows:
PRESENT: Paul Foster, Chairman
Gary Miller, Vice Chairman
Jim Macdonald, Commissioner
Ruth Cook, Commissioner
Carol Dyer, Commissioner
John James, Commissioner
Eric Shamp, Commissioner
ADVISORY STAFF Michael Reiter, Assistant City Attorney
PRESENT: Oscar Orci, Community Development Director
Robert Dalquest, Assistant Community Development Director
Manuel Baeza, Principal Planner
Tabitha Kevari, Associate Planner
Sergio Madera, Associate Planner
Chris Boatman, Assistant Planner
I. CALL TO ORDER AND PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD - 3 MINUTES
Chairman Foster called the meeting to order, and opened up the Public Comment
period. There were no comments forthcoming and the Public Comment period was
closed. All members were present.
II. CONSENT ITEMS
A. QUIEL BROS SIGNS, APPLICANT
(PROJECT PLANNER: CHRIS BOATMAN)
1. Consideration of a Notice of Exemption pursuant to Section 15311
of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
2. Consideration of Commission Sign Review No. 372 to modify
the height of an existing freeway-oriented sign from 90 feet to 81
feet 9 inches and install a new sign cabinet that is approximately
120 square feet in size for the Old Spaghetti Factory located at
1635 Industrial Park Avenue in the EV/CG, General Commercial
District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan.
It was moved by Commissioner Macdonald, seconded by Commissioner James, and
carried on a 7-0 vote to approve the Consent Calendar.
Chairman Foster stated they are going to alter the order of the agenda and will be taking
item V. (A) as the first matter of business. Chairman Foster stated Mr. Rendler is a
member of the Mayor's Climate Action task force. Mr. Rendler is a fellow member of the
task force along with Commissioner Shamp who is one of the lead chairman as well as
Chairman Foster. Chairman Foster stated the item will be addressed in December with
final recommendations. Chairman Foster invited Mr. Rendler to come forward and
present the Climate Action overview.
V. ADDENDA
Planning Commission Minutes of
November 10,2009
Page 1
A. PRESENTATION BY THE CLIMATE ACTION COMMITTEE
Mr. Dan Rendler gave a PowerPoint presentation and overview of the work that has
been completed.
Commissioner Shamp stated the Climate Action is a monumental amount of work and
no measure is sustainable unless both are ecologically and economically sustainable.
Chairman Foster stated there are many things that will directly impact the Planning
Commission's work. Some are mandated by the State of California and some are
recommended. Chairman Foster thanked Mr. Rendler.
III. OLD BUSINESS
A. WESTSIDE CHRISTIAN CHURCH, APPLICANT
(PROJECT PLANNER: TABITHA KEVARI)
1. Consideration of a Notice of Exemption pursuant to Section 15301
of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
2. PUBLIC HEARING to consider Conditional Use Permit No. 53
(Revision No. 3) to modify the existing phasing plan for off-site
improvements and to develop a 6,792 square foot classroom
expansion for an existing private school (Westside Christian
School) located at 1495 West Olive Avenue in the R-S, Suburban
Residential District.
Associate Planner Tabitha Kevari gave a PowerPoint presentation and overview of the
proposed project. Staff recommended approval of the project subject to the conditions
of approval.
Commissioner Dyer requested clarification if the existing Mondale Pines are going to be
transplanted. Associate Planner Kevari stated the Green Giant trees are new trees
which will be planted on the east elevation of the building. The existing trees will be
transplanted to the south elevation of the building.
Vice Chairman Miller inquired if the street improvements were conditioned to improve
the street on the next phase. Associate Planner Kevari stated the next phase included
the proposed addition as well as other improvements along the west property line. The
new proposal separates the addition from the improvements.
Commissioner Cook stated when the phasing was put in place the applicant had
presented a conceptual plan. Associate Planner Kevari concurred.
Commissioner Shamp stated a pad was prepared in the location of the proposed
addition, and inquired if the pad was permitted. Assistant Community Development
Director Robert Dalquest stated staff would need to verify if the pad area was shown on
the grading plan.
Chairman Foster opened up the Public Hearing.
Planning Commission Minutes of
November 10,2009
Page 2
Mr. Brad Robertson, representative, stated the applicant had prepared a phasing plan
with Revision No. 2. The phasing plan had five (5) phases; Phase Two (2) indicated a
7,000 square foot footprint on the east side of the building. The intent was to return with
Revision No. 3 which would consist of the street improvements to Bellevue Avenue
Avenue, school expansion and a parking lot on Bellevue Avenue. Mr. Robertson stated
the applicant had revised their master Phasing Plan to only show the school addition in
Phase Two and to ask for Phase Three to include the Bellevue Avenue improvements.
Originally, Phase Three included the parking lot, an addition to the sanctuary, and
Sunday school classrooms. Mr. Robertson stated they did over excavate and
constructed the pad in preparation of Phase Two, with approved grading plans.
Commissioner Cook stated the plan was conceptual, and was not an approved
entitlement. Mr. Robertson concurred.
Chairman Foster inquired how the meeting with the neighbors went. Mr. Robertson
stated they had met with Mr. and Mrs. Sonnen as well as Mr. and Mrs. Gura and
discussed all of their concerns with the setbacks. The landscaping was chosen by the
Sonnens', and the Transom windows were addressed. Mr. Robertson stated the
applicant is trying to meet the neighbor's desires.
Commissioner Miller inquired if there were any drainage problems since the 2003
incident. Mr. Robertson stated they are not aware of any current issues with drainage
and if there are they will address it.
Commissioner Dyer stated the existing drainage does flow towards a catch basin, and
stated there is no evidence of erosion at this time.
Mr. John Gura, resident, stated he is the neighbor of the Sonnens'. Mr. Gura stated the
addition is an eyesore for the neighbors. Mr. Gura recommended the applicant relocate
the addition to the other side of the building.
Mr. Sonnen, resident, stated the last drainage issue was Saturday. The sprinklers ran
for thirty minutes. Mr. Sonnen stated ten minutes into the cycle water was seeping
through the block wall. Mr. Sonnen recommended a French drain near the wall.
Chairman Foster acknowledged his drainage concerns and inquired how the meeting
went with the applicant regarding the other concerns expressed. Mr. Sonnen stated they
were cordial and accepted everything they had requested. Mr. Sonnen recommended
addressing the drainage issues before construction. Chairman Foster requested
clarification if the applicant had any other issues with the project other than the drainage.
Mr. Sonnen stated his quality of life will be compromised by the huge building towering
over their property. Mr. Sonnen confirmed his opposition to the location of the proposed
addition.
Vice Chairman Miller stated the applicant had submitted minutes of their meeting and
confirmed the French drain was discussed and read a statement that Mr. Sonnen did not
believe a French drain was necessary because the additional landscaping and trees will
cause drain failure. Mr. Sonnen stated when the landscaping is installed the roots will
cause maintenance problems with a French drain. Vice Chairman Miller requested
clarification if the clear water was draining through the toe of the slope, or the face of the
surface of the slope. Mr. Sonnen stated it is surface runoff. Vice Chairman Miller stated
the alignment of the soccer goals, and soccer field are not addressed. Mr. Sonnen
confirmed the applicant had not addressed all the items of concern.
Commissioner Shamp inquired if Mr. Sonnen would accept the proposed addition if the
applicant was required to remove the Transom windows. Mr. Sonnen confirmed it would
help.
Planning Commission Minutes of
November 10,2009
Page 3
Ms. Diane Rice, resident, stated she lives on the southside of the property and has an
unbelievable view of the mountains. If the trees are planted on the southside of the
property they will block their view. Ms. Rice declared when children have a lot of room
to play and burn off energy they are happier children. Commissioner Dyer clarified the
location of her property. Associate Planner Kevari stated the trees will be relocated to
the south section of the east property line, and will not obstruct her view.
Mr. Richard Parker, Pastor, stated if there are drainage issues they will correct the
problem. Vice Chairman Miller inquired if they were willing to make the curb and gutter,
and sidewalk improvements to the corner of Bellevue Avenue Road. Mr. Parker stated
they would be thrilled to improve Bellevue Avenue but before he could commit he
needed to know the cost for the improvements.
Chairman Foster closed the Public Hearing.
Commissioner Macdonald acknowledged he could see the view of the building from San
Pablo Street. Commissioner Macdonald stated there are two (2) issues, one being the
improvements on Bellevue Avenue and the second issue is the current building (without
the addition), is offensive to the eye in height and bulk. Commissioner Macdonald
recommended relocating the new classroom behind the structure. Commissioner
Macdonald stated the first phase was completed approximately six (6) years ago and the
street improvements were to be completed in Phase Two (2). The City would not allow a
commercial or residential development delay street improvements. Commissioner
Macdonald recommended the church complete the street improvements as approved to
relocate the proposed addition behind the existing building or another area of the
property. Commissioner Macdonald stated the Planning Commission technically
reviews the Municipal Code, General Plan, and Zoning in their decision but many times
the applicant is meeting all of the requirements but the City needs to consider the
impacts to the neighborhood.
Commissioner James concurred with Commissioner Macdonald's comments. The
addition is not consistent with the residential neighborhood and stated he is not in
support of the proposed project.
Commissioner Shamp stated he is sympathetic with the resident's right to privacy and
aesthetic views as well as the churches right to develop the land per code.
Commissioner Shamp declared the church has the right to develop the property and
outweighs the privacy and aesthetic view of the resident's. Commissioner Shamp stated
the French drain may be a maintenance issue. Commissioner Shamp declared the
improvements should be completed during the construction of onsite improvements, and
is in support of the street improvements in Phase Three.
Commissioner Cook stated the church has a Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) and is
considered by the Planning Commission for approval. The Planning Commission
weighs the rights of the neighborhood and the impacts when considering a C.U.P. for a
church. Commissioner Cook declared the building was conceptual, and was not a part
of the Phasing Plan approval. Commissioner Cook confirmed she was not in support of
the proposed project due to the impacts to the neighbors.
Planning Commission Minutes of
November 10,2009
Page 4
Commissioner Dyer requested clarification when considering a C.U.P. for a church; the
Commission is to consider traffic, noise, and hours of operation. Assistant Director
Dalquest confirmed normally they are to consider the operational impacts and in the
municipal code there are four (4) findings which address the operational impacts, and
site location for the proposed use. Commissioner Dyer requested clarification on
setbacks for Residential. Assistant Director Dalquest stated if the property was
subdivided for residential there would be a potential twenty (25) foot rear setback with a
maximum height of thirty-five (35) feet or two and one half (2 '/2) stories, and a side
setback of ten (10) feet. Commissioner Dyer expressed concern on the street
improvements not being met but agreed with Commissioner Shamp that the
improvements should be completed during the construction of onsite improvements.
Commissioner Dyer confirmed the building location is a factor and recommended
another area for the proposed addition. Commissioner Dyer requested clarification why
the drainage problems have been an issue for six (6) years without a resolution.
Vice Chairman Miller stated three quarters of the site have been improved and
recommended the applicant make at least three quarters of the street improvements.
Vice Chairman Miller confirmed there is still no solution to address the drainage issues.
Vice Chairman Miller expressed concern for the neighbors, and stated a residential
neighborhood should be able to preserve the characteristics of the neighborhood. Vice
Chairman Miller confirmed a ninety (90) foot wall that is eight (8) feet high is not
characteristic of a residential neighborhood. The rear yard setback for a residential
property is twenty-five (25) feet; this high intensity use is fourteen (14) feet which is not
enough. Vice Chairman Miller stated he could support the proposed project with the
recommendations.
Chairman Foster stated the church has master plan options, and confirmed his
disappointment that the church had not proposed any other site designs. The property
owners do not have options and the proposed project would have a negative impact on
the neighborhood. Chairman Foster stated the majority of the Commission does not
support the proposed project as it is currently submitted.
Commissioner Shamp stated if an alternate site design was chosen, the pad and
landscaping would become a play field. Commissioner Shamp declared the residents
would be affected by noise from the children, children looking over the wall, and Soccer
balls going into their yard.
Chairman Foster inquired if the Commission should table the item or continue to a
specific date.
Assistant Director Dalquest requested if the applicant was willing to continue the item to
consider an alternate site design to meet the Planning Commission's objectives. Pastor
Parker agreed to continue the item.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Macdonald, seconded by Commissioner James and
carried on a 7-0 vote, that the Planning Commission continue Conditional Use Permit
No. 53 (Revision No. 3) to the meeting of December 8, 2009.
IV. NEW BUSINESS
Planning Commission Minutes of
November 10,2009
Page 5
A. CITY OF REDLANDS, APPLICANT
(PROJECT PLANNER: TABITHA KEVARI)
1. Consideration of a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
2. PUBLIC HEARING to consider CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
960 for the replacement of Country Club Reservoir No. 1 and
installation of a new booster station located at 1927 Country Club
Drive in the R-A, Residential Estate District.
Associate Planner Tabitha Kevari gave a PowerPoint presentation and overview of the
proposed project. Staff recommended approval of the project subject to the conditions
of approval.
Chairman Foster opened the Public Hearing. There were no comments forthcoming and
the Public Hearing was closed.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Miller, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried
on a 7-0 vote to approve that the Planning Commission move that the Planning
Commission adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for Conditional Use Permit No.
960 and direct staff to file and post a `Notice of Determination' in accordance with City
guidelines."
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Miller, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried
on a 7-0 vote to approve that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit
No. 960 subject to the following findings and subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval:
1. The replacement of the existing reservoir at this location will not adversely affect
the applicable land use plans of the City because it is supported by the General
Plan policy 8.201. This policy requires the City to preserve and enhance the
supply of water and promotes a secure supply of high quality water to meet the
present and future needs of the citizens of the City of Redlands;
2. The proposed project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and
welfare because it is a conditionally permitted use within the zoning district and
meets the applicable development standards of the zone. Furthermore, the
project has been conditioned to preserve the existing landscaping on-site to
insure that vistas from adjacent residential uses will not be impacted with the
installation of the new reservoir;
3. The proposed project will comply with the regulations of the City's General Plan,
the applicable zoning district and the City's development standards because the
project site is adequate in size to accommodate the use, setbacks, building
height and building coverage. In addition, the project is conditionally permitted;
Planning Commission Minutes of
November 10,2009
Page 6
4. The proposed reservoir facility is appropriate at the proposed location in that the
use is conditionally permitted in the R-A District. In addition, the reservoir has
been located at this site since 1924 and operates together with Reservoir No. 2
which together provides potable water storage for the City of Redlands.
Furthermore, proposed reservoir facility is conditionally permitted in the R-A
District.
B. KENNETH THOMAS, APPLICANT
(PROJECT PLANNER: MANUEL BAEZA)
1. Consideration of a Notice of Exemption pursuant to Section 15301
of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
2. PUBLIC HEARING to consider Parking Modification No. 27 to
allow three (3)foot wide planters within the parking lot, a reduction
of the two-way driveway from twenty (20) feet to ten (10) feet, a
reduction of the drive aisle width from twenty-six (26) feet to
twenty-four (24)feet, and allowing one (1) on street parking stall to
count towards off-street parking requirements for a property
located at 1153 Orange Street (Historic Resource No. 105; Marten
Andersen House) in the C-4 Highway Commercial District.
3. PUBLIC HEARING to consider Conditional Use Permit No. 863
(Revision No. 1) to establish mixed commercial and residential
uses within an existing Historic property (Historic Resource No.
105; Marten Andersen House) approved for re-use as a
commercial building located at 1153 Orange Street in the C-4,
Highway Commercial District.
Principal Planner Manuel Baeza gave a PowerPoint presentation and overview of the
proposed project. Staff recommended approval of the project subject to the conditions
of approval.
Commissioner Shamp requested clarification on the original proposal regarding the
parking in the backyard when the project was approved to be annexed for the museum.
Principal Planner Baeza stated they had proposed to have outdoor seating, a small
amphitheatre, and would share parking with the existing Glass Museum. Commissioner
Shamp inquired if there was any parking in the back of the property. Principal Planner
confirmed there was not.
Commissioner Dyer confirmed her surprise to see this item on the agenda. The
Commission struggled on a previous meeting regarding if the area was changing relative
to residential, commercial, or revitalized historical buildings with the Major Singh Virk
project (three (3) parcels away). Commissioner Dyer requested staff advise the
Commission when there are adjacent proposals under consideration in an area.
Chairman Foster opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Ken Thomas, applicant, stated he is very excited with the improvements to the
property and is available for any questions.
Vice Chairman Miller inquired if the applicant would consider horizontal siding. Mr.
Thomas concurred.
Planning Commission Minutes of
November 10,2009
Page 7
Mr. Frank Herendeen, Historical and Glass Museum Foundation President, stated
originally the building was going to be destroyed and the Historical and Glass Museum
Foundation purchased the home from the Salvation Army for fifty cents and moved the
home to the current location and restored it. The Historical and Glass Museum agrees
the visitors can park in their parking lot, visit the museum, then walk next door the
antique shop.
Chairman Foster closed the Public Hearing.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner James, seconded by Commissioner Macdonald, and
carried on a 7-0 vote that the Planning Commission find that Revision No. 1 to
Commission Use Permit No. 863 and Parking Modification Permit No. 27 are exempt
from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner James, seconded by Commissioner Macdonald, and
carried on a 7-0 vote to approve that the Planning Commission approve Parking
Modification Permit No. 27 subject to the following findings:
1. The proposed parking modification and use of the historic structure is necessary
or desirable for the development of the community, is in harmony with the various
elements and objectives of the General Plan, and is not detrimental to existing
uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone. The project is in harmony with
objectives of the General Plan because it includes the adaptive re-use of the
building with no exterior changes to the front elevation which will retain the
historic character of the existing structure and surrounding area. In addition, it is
not detrimental to existing uses because the site is located in the C-4 zone which
conditionally permits mixed commercial and residential uses.
2. That approving the proposed parking modification and use will significantly
improve the possibility that the structure will be preserved and maintained as a
historic structure. Approval of the Historic Parking Modification and Conditional
Use Permit will enable the structure to be used for commercial purposes
consistent with its C-4, Highway Commercial District zoning thus significantly
improving the possibility of future preservation.
3. That the required parking cannot be provided without the approval of the
requested modification because this property has inadequate space to provide all
of the required parking improvements. Since the parcel is narrow at fifty-two (52')
wide there is limited area for landscape planters and back-out spaces and
driveways.
4. That the on-site parking lot will function safely because the parking lot contains
standard parking spaces of nineteen feet (19') by nine feet (9') and contains a
driveway width of ten feet (10') which has adequately accommodated past
adaptive reuse projects.
Planning Commission Minutes of
November 10,2009
Page 8
5. That approval of the parking modification will not harm the integrity of the historic
structure or the surrounding neighborhood because the original building will be
retained and the parking lot is located to the rear of the structure and only interior
alteration will occur.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner James, seconded by Commissioner Macdonald, and
carried on a 7-0 vote to approve that the Planning Commission approve Revision No. 1
to Commission Use Permit No. 863 subject to the following findings and subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval:
1. The proposed office use at this location will not adversely affect the applicable
land use plans of the City because mixed commercial and residential uses are a
permitted use in the C-4, Highway Commercial District, subject to approval of a
Conditional Use Permit;
2. The proposed mixed commercial and residential use will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety and welfare because it is a conditionally permitted use within
the zoning district and it will meet the applicable development standards of the
zone with the exception of those standards covered under the parking
modification;
3. The proposed commercial use will comply with the regulations of the City's
General Plan, the applicable zoning district and the City's development standards
because the proposed project is adequate in size to accommodate the use, and
setbacks. In addition, conditions of approval have been applied to the project to
ensure that development standards are met;
4. The proposed mixed commercial and residential use is appropriate at the
proposed location in that the area contains both residential and commercial uses.
This includes the addition of condition of approval number twenty-two (22) as follows:
22. Horizontal siding shall be used on the exterior of the proposed garage.
C. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
APPLICANT
(PROJECT PLANNER: MANUEL BAEZA)
A recommendation to the City Council for the approval of points for RDA
2009-IV-01 for Conditional Use Permit No. 955 and Tentative Tract Map
No.18762 to develop a 228-unit planned residential development on
approximately 19 acres located at the northeast corner of Orange Street
and Lugonia Avenue in Specific Plan No. 61. (Note: This request is for
228 allocations; No allocations have been previously awarded for this
tract.)
Principal Planner Manuel Baeza gave an overview of the proposed project. Staff and
the Commission went through each category. The Planning Commission's evaluation
totaled thirty-nine (39) points for the Residential Development Allocation.
Planning Commission Minutes of
November 10,2009
Page 9
D. VERIZON WIRELESS, APPLICANT
(PROJECT PLANNER: SERGIO MADERA)
1. Consideration of a Mitigated Negative Declaration.
2. PUBLIC HEARING to consider CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
961 to install a sixty-seven (67) foot high wireless
telecommunications tower disguised as a palm tree located within
the Southern California Edison substation on the north side of San
Bernardino Avenue, approximately 2,000 feet east of Mountain
View Avenue, within Concept Plan No. 2 of the East Valley
Corridor Specific Plan.
Associate Planner Sergio Madera gave a PowerPoint presentation and overview of the
proposed project. Staff recommended approval of the project subject to the conditions
of approval. Associate Planner Madera stated there was an error on the Mitigated
Negative Declaration motion and requested the wording changed from "Conditional Use
Permit No. 937" to "Conditional Use Permit No. 961".
Chairman Foster inquired if there were palm trees at the site location. Associate Planner
Madera confirmed there were no palm trees currently at the site.
Commissioner Shamp inquired if the mono palm was proposed by the applicant or
requested by staff. Associate Planner Madera confirmed it was proposed by staff.
Chairman Foster opened the Public Hearing.
Mr. Todd Fisher, representative, stated he was available for any questions.
Commissioner Shamp inquired if the applicant would consider installing a normal cell
tower and enhance the site with landscaping, in order to blend in with the area. Mr.
Fisher confirmed his company would be more than willing to revise the proposed project.
Associate Planner Madera stated the municipal code requires a stealth treatment added
to the proposed tower.
There was discussion on stealth treatments.
Commissioner Cook inquired if the cell tower pole was silver in order to blend in with the
transmission towers would that qualify as a stealth treatment. Community Development
Director Oscar Orci confirmed it would be considered a stealth treatment.
Commissioner Dyer recommended real palm trees, as part of the landscaping. Assistant
Director Dalquest requested clarification on the minimum size requirement for the palm
trees. Commissioner Dyer requested fifteen (15)feet of clear trek trunk.
Associate Planner Madera stated there will be a modification to the Condition of
Approval.
MOTION
Planning Commission Minutes of
November 10,2009
Page 10
It was moved by Commissioner Shamp, seconded by Commissioner Miller, and carried
on a 7-0 vote that the Planning Commission approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration
for Conditional Use Permit No. 961 and direct staff to file and post a "Notice of
Determination" in accordance with City guidelines."
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Shamp, seconded by Commissioner Miller, and carried
on a 7-0 vote that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit No. 961
based on the following findings, and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval:
1. The proposed development will not adversely affect the applicable land use plans
of the City as Wireless Service Facilities are permitted in any zone within the
City, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit and the proposed facility
complies with all of the development requirements outlined in Concept Plan 2 of
the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan and Section 18.178 of the Municipal Code;
and
2. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
and welfare as the project will be developed in accordance with all applicable
code provisions; in addition, Mitigation Measures and Conditions of Approval
have been included that minimize the project's impact on surrounding land uses
and has been designed to be integrated with its surroundings; and
3. The proposed development complies with the regulations of the City's General
Plan, the applicable development standards of Concept Plan 2 of the East Valley
Corridor Specific Plan and those of Municipal Code Chapter 18.178, Wireless
Service Facilities and fulfills the stated goals of Municipal Code Chapter 18.178
by locating the tower in a nonresidential area, the location is in area where the
adverse impact on the community is minimal; the tower has been designed in a
manner that minimizes its adverse visual impact by utilizing stealth treatment to
camouflage and conceal the facility; and by enhancing the ability of the providers
of telecommunications services to provide such services to the community
quickly, effectively and efficiently; and
4. The proposed development is appropriate at the proposed location as the subject
site is industrial in nature with the presence of the electrical substation and
service and storage yard; surrounding uses include distribution warehouses
thereby precluding the presence of sensitive receptors and the project has
incorporated a stealth treatment as a palm tree to better integrate the wireless
facility with its surroundings."
This includes the modification of condition of approval number two (2), six (6) and
fourteen (14) as follows:
2. This approval is for the establishment of a wireless telecommunications facility
which consists of a lease area of 760 square feet, a 67- 62 foot high tower with e
m^^^-^a'^^ design and a prefabricated 184 square foot equipment shelter at
2350 W San Bernardino Avenue.
6. In order to mitigate potential impacts as identified in Section I (a-c) of the initial
study, The design of the ,,,,,n„-^a'^^ shall mimin as nlese as peGGihle a real palm
tree tower shall incorporate a paint treatment that matches the existing electrical
towers in the immediate vicinity to the satisfaction of the Community
Development Director. The appli shallmai R the Peal palm tFee
Planning Commission Minutes of
November 10,2009
Page 11
appe ranGoyo�foho mnnn_nalm Should the fronds or trunk beGGme dmSGG!ered��
weathered,redf tt a apnlin�rrca Rt�..holes l � plaGe_�L fFORdS or the P94
09RG of the TRC
e ani to maintain the real palm ann panne e ♦ na non sis torQ
F}e6�eSar� rearpatrrr-ccppearcmc� �a�l ce�lrra-�aT vrseEivro�
and supports shall be painted to rnatGh the simulated feliage and shall not prejeGt
beyond trhrefr�ronds of the mono_nalm to ensure that any visual arsare
red melt to the maximum extent feasible. All connections from the ME)nG pa'M
tower to the equipment shelter and/or other support equipment shall be placed
underground (Mitigation Measure No. 1).
14. The parabolic antenna shall be painted to match the tr„ k of the mono-
pole.
V. ADDENDA
B. ARCHITECTUAL GUIDELINES
(PROJECT PLANNER: MANUEL BAEZA)
Review and consideration of a recommendation to the City Council on the
Final Draft of the Architectural Design Guidelines.
Principal Planner Baeza gave a presentation and overview of the Architectural
Guidelines. Staff recommended approval of the project.
Chairman Foster inquired if there were any changes from the Planning Commission.
Commissioner Macdonald stated his name is spelled incorrectly on the first page.
Commissioner Cook stated he appreciated the illustrations.
Commissioner Dyer stated on page number twenty-one (21) there was missing language
under item number 2.
Commissioner James stated the guidelines are long awaited and will serve the City well.
Commissioner Miller recommended using a better photo with healthier, greener grass on
page twenty-four (24).
Commissioner Shamp confirmed his appreciation.
Chairman Foster thanked everyone for their involvement and recommendations.
Chairman Foster stated the City should consider the Architectural Guidelines as a living
document.
Director Orci stated staff is going to add text above the photographs for clarification.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Cook, seconded by Commissioner James, and carried
on a 7-0 vote that the Planning Commission recommend approval to the City Council.
VI. MINUTES
A. October 27, 2009
Planning Commission Minutes of
November 10,2009
Page 12
It was moved by Commissioner James, seconded by Commissioner Macdonald and
carried on a 7-0 vote to approve the minutes of October 27, 2009.
VII. LAND USE AND CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS OF NOVEMBER 3, 2009
Chairman Foster inquired if there were any City Council actions to report for November
3, 2009.
Director Orci stated there were no actions to report.
Commissioner Macdonald inquired if the ESRI letter that was included with their packet
for informational purposes only. Director Orci stated the department is following up on
the matter, and will report back to the Commission.
VIII. ADJOURN TO DECEMBER 8, 2009
Chairman Foster adjourned the meeting at 4:26 to the December 8, 2009 meeting.
Commissioner Dyer stated she may have jury duty on December 8, 2009.
Linda McCasland Oscar Orci
Administrative Secretary Community Development Director
Planning Commission Minutes of
November 10,2009
Page 13