Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4963RESOLUTION NO. 4963 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redlands that WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redlands, County of San Bernardino, California, has heretofore determined that the public interest, convenience and necessity required the maintenance of landscape and irrigation facilities set forth in section 22525 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California, along certain boundaries of developments; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Director for the City of Redlands is appointed "Engineer of Work" with all provisions of Division 15 applicable to the Engineer applied to "Engineer of Work"; and WHEREAS, Section 22622 required that a Engineer's Report be prepared and filed annually, outlining the assessments to be levied against the benefiting properties within the Assessment District; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Director as the Engineer of Work shall prepare and file with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972; and WHEREAS, said Engineer of Work has made and filed with the City Clerk of said City a report in writing as called for by the City Council and under and pursuant to said Act, which report has been presented to this Council for consideration; and WHEREAS, said Council has duly considered said report and each and every part thereof, and finds that each and every part of said report is sufficient, and that no part of said report requires or should be modified in any respect; NOW, THEREFORE, it is ordered as follows 1 That the Engineer's Estimate of the itemized costs and expenses of said work and of the incidental expenses in connection therewith, contained in said report be, and each of them are hereby, preliminarily approved and confirmed 2 That the diagrams showing the Assessment District referred to and described in said report, the boundaries of the subdivision of land within said Assessment District as the same existed at the time of passage of said Resolution is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed 3 That the proposed assessment upon the subdivision of land in said Assessment District, in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by said subdivision, respectively, from said work and of the incidental expenses thereof, as contained in said report is hereby preliminarily approved and confirmed 4 That said report shall stand as the Engineer's Report for the purposes of all subsequent proceedings, and pursuant to the proposed district APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of April, 1993 ATTEST' CITY OF REDLANDS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ENGINEER'S REPORT FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 ENGINEER'S REPORT AND RESOLUTIONS FOR THE 1993-94 FISCAL YEAR CITY OF REDLANDS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO 1 City of Redlands Public Works Department April 1993 CITY OF REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 1993-94 FISCAL YEAR SECTION 1. Authority for Report This report is prepared by order of the City Council of the City of Redlands The report is in compliance with the requirements of Chapter 1, Article 4, Division 15 of the Street and Highways Code, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972). SECTION 2. General Description The City Council has heretofore elected to form Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 consisting of the permanent landscaped areas along the Wabash Avenue frontage of Tract 13282, the San Bernardino Avenue frontage of Tract 13434 and the Alessandro Road frontage of Tract 13496 The Council has also heretofore elected to annex the permanent landscaped improvements along the perimeter streets of the following development into Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 1 Annexation No. 1 - The San Bernardino Avenue frontage of Tracts 13745 and 13765. 2 Annexation No. 2 - The Reservoir Road frontage of Tract 13947 3. Annexation No. 3 - The Lugonia Avenue, Bryn Mawr Avenue and Interstate 10 frontages of Parcel Map 11917. 4 Annexation No. 4 - Various streets included within MS 185, MS 178, Parcel Map 12061, Parcel Map 12300, CUP 382, CRA 607, CRA 486, CUP 253, CRA 608, CUP 519, CUP 516, CUP 518, CUP 522, CUP 521, CRA 605, MS 183, MS 182, CUP 278, CUP 405, CRA 354, CRA 346, CRA 607, Tract 12461 and Parcel Map 12022. 5 Annexation No. 5 - Various streets included within MS 188, MS 189, Tract 14556, CRA 611, MS 196, MS 195, CRA 615 and CRA 536. 6 Annexation No. 6 - Various streets included within CRA 517, CRA 628, CRA 624, CRA 305, Tract 13575, CUP 550, CRA 623, CUP 542, MS 210 and MS 201. 7 Annexation No. 7 - Various streets included within MS 213, MS 211, CUP 559, CRA 636, CRA 546, CRA 641, CRA 640, CUP 562 and CUP 548. -9- 8 Annexation No 8 - Various streets included within CRA 637, Tract 10179, CUP 574, CRA 642, and MS 216-B. The City Council has determined will have an effect upon all lots annexations to the district All easements or roadway right-of-way Redlands that the areas to be landscaped within the original district and landscaped areas are portions of previously granted to the City of SECTION 3. Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for the landscaping either have been or are being prepared by the developers. The plans and specifications for the landscaping will be in conformance with the requirements of the City Planning and Community Development Department Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps, developments and assessment diagrams for the exact location of the landscape areas. The plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a part of this report to the same extent as if said plans and specifications were attached hereto. SECTION 4. Improvements The developers of Tracts 13434, 13745, 13765, 13282, 13496, 13947, and Parcel Map 11917 have installed the landscaping improvements. These locations may be located on the reduced copies of the assessment diagrams included within the formation report and Annexations 1, 2, and 3. Landscaping is not presently planned to be maintained at any other locations in Landscape Maintenance District No 1 The City staff is presently developing procedures for inspections, acceptance, and maintenance of the landscaping improvements. It is anticipated that a member of the Community Services Department will be the individual assigned the overall responsibility. SECTION 5. Estimated Maintenance Costs It is anticipated that the City will contract for maintenance services on the landscaping improvements The City's recordkeeping will be required to be sufficiently accurate to detail the expenses so that these costs may be recaptured through assessments. -10- Due to the restrictions placed upon municipal budgets through the passage of Jarvis -Gann and the lag between the time assessments are made and revenues are collected by the City, it is appropriate that assessments be made in advance of the anticipated expenditures to provide working capital for the maintenance effort. This method will be used for all developments which have had final tract maps filed or as directed by the City staff. In this case it is reasonable to expect these landscaping improvements to be completed with the 1993-94 fiscal year. Development not likely to have landscaping improvements completed during the 1993-94 fiscal year, specifically those not having final tract maps or other development plans filed at this time, should not have assessments levied on them for maintenance. There is, however, one exception. Since the district does need to levy assessment to recapture a portion of the cost involved in the preparation of the annual report, there will therefore be an assessment levied on Annexations No 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 for the annual report. Development that had assessments levied previously but which have not yet had landscaping improvements installed should not be assessed this fiscal year providing their fund balance is sufficient The following assessments include costs or balances accumulated to date, and estimated costs for the 1993-94 fiscal year for the landscaping to be maintained by Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 - Tracts 13282, 13434, and 13496 (Original District Formation) Tract 13282 (38 lots) (City Designation: Original District 1-A) (Wabash Avenue) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Maintenance Contract Maintenance = $ 2,337 Water & Electric = 1,895 Field Inspections = 1,444 Incidental Expenses General Administration Engineering 1993-94 Estimated Costs Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 1993-94 Assessment $5,676 766 = 100 $ 866 $ 6,542 3,713 $ 3,000 Tract 13434 (78 lots) (City Designation: Original District 1-B) (San Bernardino Avenue at Vermont Street i Columbia Street) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Maintenance Contract Maintenance = $ 1,964 Water & Electric = 2,410 Field Inspections = 1,444 Incidental Expenses General Administration Engineering 1993-94 Estimated Costs Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 1993-94 Assessment $ 5,818 = 785 100 $ 885 $ 6,703 3,805 $ 3,000 Tract 13496 (9 lots) (City Designation: Original District 1-C) (Alessandro Road) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Maintenance Contract Maintenance = $ 3,424 Water & Electric = 8,712 Field Inspections = 1,444 Incidental Expenses General Administration = 1,833 Engineering = 100 $ 1,933 1993-94 Estimated Costs $15,513 Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 8,805 1993-94 Assessment $ 7,000 Annexation No. 1 - Tract 13745 (38 lots) (City Designation: Annexation 1-A) (San Bernardino Avenue & Occidental Street) $13,580 1993-94 Fiscal Year Maintenance Contract Maintenance = $ 2,628 Water & Electric = 2,470 Field Inspections = 1,444 Incidental Expenses General Administration = 883 Engineering = 100 $ 983 1993-94 Estimated Costs $ 7,525 Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 4,271 1993-94 Assessment $ 3,500 $ 6,542 Annexation No. 1 - Tract 13765 (25 lots) (City Designation: Annexation 1-B) (San Bernardino Avenue at University Street & Hanford Drive) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Maintenance Contract Maintenance = $ 1,433 Water & Electric = 1,206 Field Inspections = 1,444 $ 4,083 Incidental Expenses General Administration = 551 Engineering = 100 $ 651 1993-94 Estimated Costs $ 4,734 Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 2,687 1993-94 Assessment $ 2,200 Annexation No. 2 - Tract 13947 (35 lots) (City Designation: Annexation 2-A) (Reservoir Road) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Maintenance Contract Maintenance = $ 4,625 Water & Electric = 2,500 Field Inspections = 1,444 Incidental Expenses General Administration Engineering 1993-94 Estimated Costs Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 1993-94 Assessment $ 8,569 = 1,157 = 100 $ 1,257 $ 9,826 5,577 $ 4,500 Annexation No. 3 - Parcel Map 11917 (5 lots) (City Designation: Annexation 3-A) (Lugonia Avenue 6 Bryn Mawr Street) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Maintenance Contract Maintenance Water & Electric Field Inspections Incidental Expenses General Administration = 500 Engineering = 100 $ 600 1993-94 Estimated Costs 1993-94 Assessment $ 600 Annexation No. 4-A - MS 185 (4 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering $ 0 1993-94 Assessment $ 0 Annexation No. 4-B MS 178 (10 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 0 1993-94 Assessment $ 0 Annexation No. 4-C - Parcel Map 12061 (6 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 0 1993-94 Assessment $ 0 -15- Annexation No., 4-D - MS 184 (3 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 18 1993-94 Assessment $ 18 Annexation No. 4-E - CUP 382 (2 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 12 1993-94 Assessment $ 12 Annexation No. 4-F - CRA 606 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 4-G - CRA 486 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 4-H - CUP 253 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 $ 6 Annexation No. 4-I - CRA 608 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 -16- Annexation NO. 4-J - CUP 519 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 4-K - CUP 516 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 $ 6 Annexation No. 4-L - CUP 518 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 4-M - CUP 522 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 4-N - CUP 521 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 4-0 - CRA 605 (3 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 18 1993-94 $ 18 -17- Annexation No. 4-P - Parcel Map 12087 (3 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering $ 18 1993-94 Assessment $ 18 Annexation NO. 4-R - CUP 278 (3 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 18 1993-94 Assessment $ 18 Annexation No. 4-8 - CUP 405 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 $ 6 Annexation No. 4-T - CRA 354 (2 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 12 1993-94 Assessment $ 12 Annexation No. 4-U - CRA 346 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 4-V - CRA 607 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 -18- Annexation No. 4-W - Tract 14261 (20 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 123 1993-94 $ 123 Annexation No. 4-X - Parcel Map 12022 (10 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 62 1993-94 Assessment $ 62 Annexation No. 5-A - M8 188 (4 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 25 1993-94 Assessment $ 25 Annexation No. 5-8 - M8 178 (5 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 31 1993-94 Assessment $ 31 Annexation No. 5-C - Tract 14556 (10 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 62 1993-94 Assessment $ 62 Annexation No. 5-E - M8 196 (5 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 31 1993-94 Assessment $ 31 -19- Annexation No. 5-G - CRA 615 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 5-H - CRA 536 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 6-A - CRA 517 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 6-B - CRA 628 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 6-C - CRA 624 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 6-D - CRA 305 (2 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 12 1993-94 Assessment $ 12 -20- Annexation No. 6-E - Tract 13575 (27 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 166 1993-94 Assessment $ 166 Annexation No. 6-F - CUP 550 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 6-G - CRA 623 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 6-H - CUP 542 (9 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 55 1993-94 Assessment $ 55 Annexation No. 6-J - MS 201 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 7-B - MS 211 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 -21- Annexation No. 7-C - CUP 559 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering 1993-94 Assessment Annexation No. 7-E - CRA 546 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering 1993-94 Assessment Annexation No. 7-F - CRA 641 (2 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering 1993-94 Assessment Annexation No. 7-G - CRA 640 (3 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering 1993-94 Assessment Annexation No. 7-H - CUP 562 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering 1993-94 Assessment Annexation No. 7-I - CUP 548 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering 1993-94 Assessment -22- $ 6 $ 6 6 $ 6 Annexation No. 8-A - CRA 637 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 Annexation No. 8-B - Tract 10179 (36 lots) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 216 1993-94 Assessment $ 216 Annexation No. 8-D - CRA 642 (1 lot) 1993-94 Fiscal Year Engineering = $ 6 1993-94 Assessment $ 6 SECTION 6. Assessment Diagram Copies of the assessment diagrams were attached to the Engineer's Reports and were labeled "Exhibit A " For reference, please see said reports for the assessment diagrams. SECTION 7. Assessment The City Council, in forming Landscape Maintenance District No 1 and in annexing territories to the district, has maintained the philosophy that the subdivider or developer is responsible for the plantings, irrigation system, and the maintenance of the improvements until they become well established. The assessments for maintenance thus only include anticipated costs incurred subsequent to the acceptance of the system by the City Council on behalf of the Maintenance District. The maintenance of the landscaping is vital for the protection of both economic and humanistic values of the development. The City Council has heretofore determined that for the preservation of values incorporated within developments adjacent to landscaped areas, the landscaped areas should be included in a maintenance district to ensure satisfactory levels of maintenance. The establishment of the assessment for each development must be on a unit by unit basis which will preserve the integrity of each -23- project There should be a review of each annexation to determine the effect upon the other units that have been developed. These possible effects will have to be considered when determining the annual assessments. The determination of benefit for the lots within the district takes into consideration the following facts for the original district and all annexations thereto: Original District - Tracts 13282, 13434 and 13496 1 The purpose of landscaping is to provide an aesthetic impression on the area. 2. The maintained landscaping benefits all properties in the development. 3 The benefit to the lots not adjacent to the landscaped areas benefit by the uniform maintenance and appearance. All lots not abutting the landscaped areas benefit equally. 4 The landscaping on the Wabash Avenue and San Bernardino Avenue boundaries of Tracts 13282 and 13434 respectively, is oriented away from the units adjacent to the landscaped areas; however, these properties were given a 10 percent surcharge to recognize proximity and support benefit 5 The landscaping in the common area along the Alessandro Road frontage of Tract 13496 is oriented towards all the units. Two of the lots abut the landscaped areas and were given a 20 percent surcharge to recognize proximity and support benefit 6. The lots to receive surcharge shall be considered to be within Assessment Zone "A." Formula for Assessment A = Assessment per interior lot L = Number of lots not adjacent to landscaping areas on the Wabash Avenue frontage of Tract 13282, the San Bernardino Avenue frontage of Tract 13434 and the Alessandro Road frontage of Tract 13496. P = Number of lots with 10 percent or 20 percent surcharge. LA + P [(1 10) or (1.20)] A = Amount to be assessed -24- The 1993-94 assessment will be spread based upon the preceding formula. Tract 13282 Total lot count in Tract 13282 is 38 lots, with 8 of these lots being adjacent to Wabash Avenue. 1993-94 Assessment (30A) + 8 (1.10A) = $ 3,000 A = $ 77 32 Amount of assessment for lots not adjacent to the landscaping areas on Wabash Avenue = $77 32. Amount of Assessments for lots adjacent to Wabash Avenue with 10 percent surcharge = $85.05 Tract 13434 Total lot count in Tract 13434 is 78 lots, with 4 of these lots being adjacent to San Bernardino Avenue. 1993-94 Assessment (74A) + 4 (1.10A) = $ 3,000 A = $ 38 27 Amount of assessment for lots not adjacent to the landscaping areas on San Bernardino Avenue = $38.27. Amount of assessments for lots adjacent to San Bernardino Avenue with 10 percent surcharge = $42.09. Tract 13496 Total lot count in Tract 13496 is 9 lots, with 2 of these lots being adjacent to Alessandro Road. 1993-94 Assessment (7A) + 2 (1.2A) = $ 7,000 A = $ 744.68 -25- Amount of assessment for lots not adjacent to the landscaping areas on Alessandro Road = $744 68 Amount of assessments for lots adjacent to Alessandro Road with 20 percent surcharge = $893.61. Annexation No. 1 - Tract 13745 1 The purpose of landscaping is to provide an aesthetic impression on the area 2. The maintained landscaping benefits all properties in the development. 3 The benefit to the lots not adjacent to the landscaped areas benefit by the uniform maintenance and appearance. All lots not abutting the landscaped areas benefit equally. 4 The landscaping on San Bernardino Avenue is oriented away from the lots adjacent to the landscaped areas; however, these properties were given a 10 percent surcharge to recognize proximity and support benefit. These lots are within Assessment Zone "A" as shown on the Assessment Diagram. Formula for Assessment A = Assessment per interior lot L = Number of lots not adjacent Bernardino Avenue P = Number of lots with 10 Assessment Zone "A" to landscaping areas on San percent surcharge within LA + P (1.10) A = Amount to be assessed The 1993-94 assessment will be spread based upon the preceding formula Total lot count in the tract is 38 lots, with 9 of these lots being adjacent to San Bernardino Avenue. 1993-94 Assessment (29A) + 9 (1.10A) = $ 3,500 A = $ 89.97 -26- Amount of assessment for lots not adjacent to the landscaping areas on San Bernardino Avenue = $89.97 Amount of assessments for lots within Assessment Zone "A" adjacent to the San Bernardino Avenue landscaping areas with 10 percent surcharge = $98 97. 1993-94 Assessments Tract Number 13745 Lots 16 through 24 = $ 98.97 each All remaining lots = $ 89.97 each Annexation No. 1 - Tract 13765 1. The purpose of landscaping is to provide an aesthetic impression on the area. 2 The maintained landscaping benefits all properties in the development 3 The benefit to the lots not adjacent to the landscaped areas benefit by the uniform maintenance and appearance. All lots not abutting the landscaped areas benefit equally. 4 The landscaping on San Bernardino Avenue is oriented away from the lots adjacent to the landscaped areas; however, these properties were given a 10 percent surcharge to recognize proximity and support benefit. These lots are within Assessment Zone "A" as shown on the Assessment Diagram. Formula for Assessment A = Assessment per interior lot L = Number of lots not adjacent Bernardino Avenue P = Number of lots with 10 Assessment Zone "A" to landscaping areas on San percent surcharge within LA + P (1 10) A = Amount to be assessed The 1993-94 assessments will be spread based upon the preceding formula. Total lot count in the tract is 25 lots, with 2 of these lots being adjacent to San Bernardino avenue. -27- 1993-94 Assessment (23A) + 2 (1.10A) = $ 2,200 A = $ 87 30 Amount of assessment for lots not adjacent to the landscaping areas on the San Bernardino Avenue = $ 87.30. Amount of assessments for lots within Assessment Zone "A" adjacent to San Bernardino Avenue landscaping areas with 10 percent surcharge = $ 96.03. 1993-94 Assessments Tract Number 13765 Lots 2 through 24 = $ 87 30 each All remaining lots = $ 96.03 each Annexation No. 2 - Tract 13947 1 The purpose of landscaping is to provide an aesthetic impression on the area. 2 The maintained landscaping benefits all properties in the development. 3 The benefit to the lots not adjacent aid the landscaped areas benefit by the uniform maintenance and appearance. All lots not abutting the landscaped areas benefit equally 4 The landscaping on Reservoir Road is oriented away from the lots adjacent to the landscaped areas; however, these properties were given a 10 percent surcharge to recognize proximity and support benefit. These lots are within Assessment Zone "A" as shown on the Assessment Diagram Formula for Assessment A = Assessment per interior lot L = Number of lots not adjacent to landscaping areas on Reservoir Road P = Number of lots with 10 percent surcharge within Assessment Zone "A" LA + P (1.10) A = Amount to be assessed -28- The cost of planting and installing improvements is to be paid by the developer. For the benefit of the future owners the estimated 1993-94 assessment will be spread based upon the preceding formula. Total lot count in the district is 35 lots, with 4 of these lots being adjacent to Reservoir Road. 1993-94 Assessment (31A) + 4 (1 10A) = $ 4,500 A = $127 12 Amount of assessment for lots not adjacent to the on Reservoir Road = $127.12. Amount of assessments for lots within Assessment to the Reservoir Road landscaping areas with 10 = $139 83 1993-94 Assessments Tract Number 13947 Lots 8, 26, 27 and 35 = $139.83 each All remaining lots = $127.12 each landscaping areas Zone "A" adjacent percent surcharge Annexation No. 3 - Parool Map 11917 Formula for Assessment T = Total length of perimeter landscaping = 3,099' L = Individual lot length of perimeter landscaping A = Amount to be assessed = $ 600 The 1993-94 assessment will be spread based upon the preceding formula Total lot count in the district is 4 lots. 1993-94 Assessment Assessment per lot: Parcel 2 = Parcel 3 = Parcel 4 = Parcel 5 = 1010' / 3099' x $ 600 206' / 3099' x $ 600 324' / 3099' x $ 600 1559' / 3099' x $ 600 -29- $ 195.55 $ 39.88 • $ 62.73 ▪ $ 301.84 Annexation No. 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 No assessments are proposed to be levied on the parcels in these annexations except for the per lot general City overhead charges and the prorated share of the annual engineer's report. This assessment will be $6 00 per lot in each of these annexations. * * * * * * * * * * * The City Council will hold a public hearing on June 1, 1993, to determine the assessments based upon the costs for 1993-94 Fiscal Year which are anticipated to be incurred by the City and which are to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscaping and Lighting District Act of 1972. SECTION 8. Order of Events 1 City Council adopts resolution of preliminary approval of Engineer's Report. 2 City Council adopts resolution of intention specifying the district boundary and sets a public hearing. 3. City Council conducts public hearing, considers all testimony and determines whether to confirm the annual assessments Submitted By: RONALD C. MUTTER R C E 2$ t29 Engineer of Work i Exn 3.31 7►F RONALD C. MUTTER 28129 CIVIL ENGINEERING .� -30-