HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973-0130_CCv0001.pdf 3's of an adjourned regular meeting of the City Council, City of Redlands,
held in the council Chambers, Safety Hall, 212 Brookside Avenue on
January 30, 1973 at 4:00 P.M.
Charles G. DeMirjyn, Vice Mayor
Ellsworth E. Miller, Councilman
Sam S . Sewall, Councilman
R. P. Merritt, Jr. , City Manager
Edward F. Taylor, City Attorney
Peggy A. Moseley, City Clerk
Erwin S . Hein, Redlands Daily Facts
Chuck Palmer, San Bernardino Sun
Jack B. Cummings, Mayor
Chresten M. Knudsen, Councilman
This adjourned Council meeting was scheduled for the purpose of:
(1) award of sale of $250,000 1962 Sewer Bonds ; (2) award of con-
struction contracts for sewage treatment plant; (3) other business as
required.
Bids for $250,000 "1962 Sewer Bonds, Series B" were opened and pub-
licly declared in the office of the City Clerk at 2:00 P.M. this date
as previously advertised.
Bank of America Premium $ 9.00
Cost 4.389%
Security Pacific National Bank Premium $ 22.00
Los Angeles, Calif. Net Interest $60,853.00
Cost 4.42567%
United California Bank Premium $ 16.00
Los Angeles, Calif. Net Interest $60, 759.00
Sewer Cost 4.418836%
Bonds United States National Bank Premium $ 37. 50
San Diego, Calif. Net Interest $61,412.00
Cost 4.46636%
Weeden and Company Premium $ 0
Los Angeles, Calif. Net Interest $59, 350.00
Cost 4.316%
Wells Fargo Bank Premium $ 17 . 50
San Francisco, Calif. Net Interest $62, 107. 50
Cost 4.5169%
Each bid was accompanied by a good faith check in the amount of
All bids were referred to a committee for checking and computati
a report thereon to be given to Council at the 4:00 P.M. meeting
At this time, it is the report of the committee appointed to the
compute the bids that the bid of Weeden and Company is the bid y
the lowest net cost to the city: $59, 350.00.
After considering each of the bids and the report thereon, on mo
of Councilman Sewall, seconded by Councilman Miller, Resolution
Resolution 3020, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redlands a
No. 3020 $250,000 bonds of said city to the best bidder and rejecting all
Bid Award bids, was adopted by the following roll call vote:
AYES : Councilmen Miller, Sewall, Vice Mayor DeMirjyn
NOES : None
ABSENT: Councilman Knudsen, Mayor Cummings
At this time, Council thanked Mr . Ed Hyland of Stone and Youngbe
Municipal Financing Consultants , Inc. for his assistance. Mr. H
expressed satisfaction with the number and competitiveness of th
and stated that the low interest rate reflected the city's AA ra
BIDS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
Bids on the modification and expansion of Redlands wastewater tr
and disposal facilities were received and publicly opened in the
of the City Clerk on December 20, 1972 at 10:00 A.M. Bids were
from seven contractors as indicated on the attached sheets . (SeePa(
The bids were reviewed by the staff, referred to the consultant
John Carollo and to the State Water Resources Control Board.
At this time, it is the recommendation of Utilities Supexintende,
Jack Shefchik, that following receipt of a grant increase from t*,
vironmental Protection Aaencv: recommendation of To'hn Carnlln Rn,
Alternate Bid I - $ 51, 000
Alternate Bid II - $ 91,000
Alternate Bid III - $ 154,000
Total - $3,671,000
This contract to be awarded to the E. L. Yeager Construction Company
of Riverside as their bid is the lowest received.
Schedule II - $348,958
sward This contract to be awarded to Jesse Hubbs and Son of Rialto, as their
r bid is the lowest submitted for Schedule II .
tment
Lity Following discussion, on motion of Councilman Sewall, seconded by
Councilman Miller, award of this contract as described above, was
authorized subject to receipt of written approval on both extension
of the State Grant, and confirmation of low bid award by the State
Water Resources Control Board by AYE votes of all present.
On motion of Councilman Miller, seconded by Councilman Sewall, two
grant deeds were accepted and the City Manager authorized to execute
the certificates of acceptance on behalf of the city as follows :
Deeds to the City of Redlands from Eva B. Stover for property at 118 East
�r and Redlands Boulevard.
3.n to the City of Redlands from Oral E. and Marjorie E. Norman for pro-
perty at 126 and 128 East Redlands Boulevard.
These two properties are being purchased for future parking facilities
City Manager Merritt presented a recommendation from the Board of
Parking Place Commissioners that an option to purchase the property
presently identified as Parking Lot #3 located on the northeast corner
Lng of Redlands Boulevard and Fifth Street be granted to Life Development
f3 Company in the amount of $100,000 with option to run 12 months at
)sed $100 per month. Council discussed this matter at length, noted that
)w
the appraisal of $100,000 had been made in 1970 and added that it was
broad public knowledge that the property was for sale.
Council discussed this at length. City Attorney Taylor recommended
that a public hearing be held to determine that there is no longer a
public 'need for this property.
Councilman Miller moved that the Council accept the option with the
reservation that a public hearing be held at the Council meeting on
February 20 to determine that a public use no longer exists . Motion
was seconded by Councilman Sewall and carried by AYE votes of all
present.
City Manager Merritt presented Resolution No. 3019, a resolution of
Luton the City of Redlands amending the salary schedule to increase the
�_l ^
Mr. Joseph Aiello, of 1125 Ramona Drive, addressed Council as I
senting neighbors in the area of the Highland Acres PRD develor
of Citrus Investments, Inc. He stated that the neighbors do nc
the PRD development on that property, do not feel that it will
beneficial to the area, took exception to the Environmental ImF
PRD Study and asked for a delay in the development.
Planning Director Schindler explained that the Environmental Re
Committee compared the alternate plan for the same area with cc
ation of grading, appearance and drainage, and concluded that t
was a satisfactory use of the land.
The Council and other neighbors spoke on this matter at extreme
great length.
Mrs. F. D. Atkinson also addressed Council. Vice Mayor DeXirj�
repeated his statement that he would prefer the PRD with a lowE
density. Planning Director Schindler stated that he originally
recommended a lower density. Councilman Sewall reiterated that
believed the PRD development allowed more open space and paid I
"homage to the almighty auto.," City Attorney Taylor expressed
pathy with the neighbors in their feeling and stated that the c
ordinances have been complied with in this matter and that the
recourse at this point would be that of legal action.
Councilman Sewall added that density can be considered from twc
points of view; one being the number of units in a prescribed a
the other, the number of people occupying the units in that san
There being no further discussion, Council adjourned at 5:20 P�
Next regular meeting, February 6, 1973.
A
ATTEST:
ice a .17' of itffot Re nc
WY40 Of
Z-�
Ci� erk
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT - NAME AND ADDRESS Of BIDDERS:
1. C t C/Bohner, Inc./Lomar 1000 Elwell Court, Palo Alto, California, 94303
2. I.T.I. A gordick - Post Office Box 279, Baldwin Park, California, 91706
3. Jesse Hobbs & Sons - Post Office Box 490, Rialto, California, 92376
4. C. Norman Peterson Company - Post Office Box 89, Berkeley, California, 94701
*5. Weardco Construction Corporation - 10910 Shoemaker Avenue, Santa Fe, California, 90670
6. E. L. Yeager Construction Co., Inc. - Post Office Box 87, Riverside, California, 92502
*7. Ziebarth & Alper - Post Office Box 4605, Carson, California, 90745
Will not accept Schedule 11 only.
ALTERNATE BID ITEMS
em Bidders
1 2 3 -4---�-��� '*5 6 *7
Schedule 1 14°600,000 3,445,000 No Bid 3,936`500 3°40^800 3'375,00 3"382,000
khedule 2 463,900 625~00 348*958 552,600 408.000 424'00 420/00
oo° (Award
ntroCtmr) O 100,000 No 8i6 100000 5,000 13,500 O
Bid
1 plus
2 lnmw
5°063,900 3,970,000 No Bid 4,389°100 3,873,000 8.785,500 3,8020000
Item #1-Add 75,000 52,000 No Bid 56,000 51°000 610000 54,000
Item #2~66d 125,000 83°0o0 No Bid 92,000 32,000 910080 9O,O00
Item #3-Add 210°000 168'000 No 81d 174^000 1661000 154rOUO 161.000
|tom #4~Add 15,000 79,000 11.300 29,508 12,500 15,000 18,000
Item #5 ~
Rdoct 29°80 19,39 45,08 28.00 17~00 27,00 21.00
Item #6 ~
mducf 27^00 18,00 44~00 27,80 16,00 26,00 20.00
Item 17 -
wdmd 38_00 19~70 No Bid 41.00 29,00 40,80 0°00
|fmm 0N-Dwdm± 6,000 5,000 No Bid 7.000 4,800 2,900 5°400
Item #9~0oUocf 2'500 3~800 No Bid 4,500 30400 2,700 ],UOO
Item #10~Q,Jm:t 40800 lO,00O No Bid 8`800 7,400 7.500 5,00
Item 011~Oedoot 6,500 40800 No Bid 9^200 6^400 5°800 7.500
Item #12~Deduut 134'000 85,000 No Bid 94,000 70,080 74.00 q3,000
0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0