HomeMy WebLinkAbout03221982-cc_CCv0001.pdf 158
— - — -- - - tgw"i
MINUTF4 of an adjourned regular meeting of the City Council
of the City of Redland.
held in the Council Chambers, Safety Hall, 212 Brookside Avenue, at 7:00
P.M. on March 22, 1982 i1�sa
jPRESENT James W. Gorman, Vice Mayor
�tt Oddie J. Martinez, Jr. , Councilmember
�t I Barbara Cram Riordan, Councilmember
Ken Roth, Councilmember
�yl Chris C. Christiansen, City Manager
W. C. Schindler, Director of Planning %2
Peggy A. Moseley, City Clerk
i.y}r
Glenn Cunliffe, Redlands Daily Facts
Pat Brown, The Sun
1}i
u ! ABSENT! Charles G_ DeMirjyn, Mayor 1��1
�r Mayor Gorman called the meeting to order at 7.OD P.M. and requested a h,
it j,{f
moment of silence in recognition of the untimely death of University of {
1y Redlands Professor James Ifft_
j„
Mayor Gorman stated that in addition to the review of the proposed changes iIN"
and amendments to Ordinance No. 1680 and Ordinance No. 1742, which is the
�l C purpose of this adjourned meeting, there was one piece of additional
business. That is the employment agreement of Police Chief Brickley.
1
Z.r Employient Following a brief discussion, on motion of Councilman Roth, seconded by
��{ ( Agreement Councilman Martinez, the contractural agreement between the City and Chief!
? (
Police !Chief
Brickley was approved by AYE votes of all present. U
1,,
7:1.0 P.M. Councilman Martinez excused himself from the meeting and
�t left the Chambers for a previous commitment. ''1�}e
{
Members of the Planning Commission were invited to attend this meeting to
1
discuss and review in detail suggestions brought forward in connection b}
i with Proposition "R" by the Council, the Commission, the staff, and the J ),
{)
public. 'J'j
{ ) Planning Commissioners resent were: Chairman Swen Larson, Manuel Madrid
g p l
Dick Burkhart, Carole Beswick, and Joan Dotson.
The Council first discussed Section II - Point Rating System. Directors
1
of Public Works Donnelly spoke briefly regarding the requirements of "6.
Street - b. (1) , (2) , (3) , and (4) . To each statement "within 1/4 mile
of the tract boundary" was added by concensus. Under "7. Sanitary Sewage,
' Item C" the word "or" was changed to "and" in the same manner,
i
Mr. Donnelly then left the Chambers
Each alphabetical and numerical division was considered; changes were
spelled out and advantages explained. This detailed review was followed
for each item of section II and each item was discussed until a consensus
of agreement was reached. Concerted effort toward quality construction
and design were at the front of all proposals. An informal exchange
between Planning Commissioners and the Councilmembers continued during
f this entire session.
r�
Section III - Procedure for Allocation of Building Permits - was the next
i
matter for attention. In reviewing Division A, Prerequisites to Applica-
tion, the Councilmembers expressed appreciation and gratitude for the
dedication of the Planning Commisioners in undertaking the review and
point rating allotment on the six categories listed for Commission review.
i
They spoke of the advantages of having Commission input, the value of
project review in public, and the resulting upgrading of projects.
i
ry St
t3!t§?
hof"N" 1
11159
p# _ W,
fI,I rod:,:.
Dr. Roth voiced concern for overburdening the Commission; however, the !'
x IMI `fir
c members present concurred in their acceptance of this responsibility.
i 6
} Lengthy study was given to developer .requests for opportunity to resubmit y
revised plans in order to improve rating assignment. Planning Director
�aMI
Schindler was authorized to add a paragraph to this section limiting
IN,
continuance to a one-time permit with the revision submitted within twenty ci
h
one days of the continuance.
I
sinu'E,
UnderDivision F, Allocation of Building Permits, the Council added a
priviso that. the 35-unit limit could be increased in order to allocate the
Notal authorized allotment.
gat ti
ggg,,w Under Division H, Transfer of Allocations, the statement "under which the �G3
41§t i txr?;
IN, allocations was originally approved" was underlined for emphasis,
'x{k s t
til
i A new Division. J, Time Limit, was added to limit the time for implementa ;
vs
pita tion of an allocation to two (2) years from the date of the award.
Definition to be: Implementation is receipt of final approval for the s"
k
tract Or project and issuance of a building permit for at least one
residential unit.
r�{s
s r
In closing, the Council considered timing for the first reading and adop-
tion of this ordinance by the full Council. A meeting was set for March ki(;
30, 1982, at 7:00 P.M. for the first reading. The. City Clerk was author ls<'
ized to advertise a public hearing on this ordinance for April 6, 1982, gg
icy
at the: regular Council meeting.
`P'!iere being no further business, the Council adjourned to a closed session
to discuss personnel matters, and to adjourn from that to an adjourned,
M
adjourned regular meeting on March 30, 1982, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council �0'
Chambers. if9{
,u
Next regular meeting, Aril 6, 1982.
g g, P
f��nrx
d '1
a
i
r„
9 ry
._ — •-- —_ i tint
ATTL;S`i=vj
4ri',}riQe.
t�
xt?
,V P
Cttyr -3 J
M1 €k
0-0-0-0-0-0--0-0-0 fp?
n sI
}
� 1{
(I"", M
4 a1�fix;
A!{
at�
,,FFid Q
IRON,