Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Ordinances_2650_CCv0001.pdf
ORDINANCE NO. 2650 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RE ELANDS AMENDING:, CHAPTER 3.16 OF THE REDLANDS MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO FEES AND SERVICE CHARGES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLAND a DOES ORDAIN A FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 3.16, entitled "Fee and Service Charge Revenue C Cost Comparison System,",of the Redlands Municipal Code is hereby deleted in its entirety and rewritten to read as follows "`Chapter 3.16 FEE AND SERVICE_CHARGE REVENUE / COST COMPARISON ON SYSTEM Sections; 3.16.0110 Intent. 316.0 20 Delegation of Authority and Direction to City Manager 3.16.030 Casts Reasonably Berne 3,16.6401 Schedule of Fees and Service Charges 3.16.050 Public Meeting / Hearing 3.16.6601 Provision of Data 3.16,0701 Actual Cast, Deposits, Collection of Additional Meaney and Refunds 3.16.0101 Intent: Pursuant to Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, it is the intent of the City Council of the City of Redlands to require the ascertainment of recovery of costs reasonably borne from fees and charges levied therefor in providing the regulation,product or service hereinafter enumerated in this Chapter. The fee and service charge revenue/cost comparison system established by this Chapter provides a mechanism to ensure that fees adopted by the City for services rendered do not exceed the reasonable estimated costs for providing the regulation, product or service for which the fees are: charged. 3,16.020 Delegation of Authorit and Direction to Cit Manager. A. The City Manager is hereby delegated the authority and directed to review and make recommendations to the City Council to implement the City Council's policy for the adjustment of fees and charges to recover the percentage of costs reasonably borne in providing the regulation, product or service enumerated in this Chapter in the percentage of costs reasonably borne and on the schedule of rate review and revision as hereinafter" established in this Chapter. 2650 DOC B. The City Manager is hereby delegated the authority to issue administrative orders establishing fee collection and financial procedures. All administrative orders shall be signed by any affected department heads and the Finance Director. 3. .030 Costs Reasonably Borne. "Costs reasonably borne," as used and applied in this Chapter, consist of the following-elements. A. ollowing elements.- A. All applicable direct costs including, but not limited to, salaries,wages,fringe benefits, services and supplies, operation expenses, contracted services, special supplies and any other direct expense incurred. B. All applicable indirect costs including, but not limited to, building maintenance and operations, equipment maintenance, communication, printing and reproduction, and like expenses when distributed on a rational proration system. C. Fixed asset recovery expenses,consisting of depreciation of fixed assets and additional fixed asset expense recovery charges calculated on the current estimated cost of replacement, divided by the approximate life expectancy of the fixed asset. A further additional charge to make up the depreciation not previously recovered and reserved in cash also shall be calculated and considered a cost so as to recover such unrecovered depreciation over the remaining life of the asset. D. General overhead, expressed as a percentage, distributing and charging the expenses of the City Council, City Manager, Finance Department, City Clerk, City Treasurer, City Attorney's Office, Administrative Services Department and all other staff and support service provided to the entire City organization. E Departmental overhead, expressed as a percentage, distributing and charging the cost of each department head and his or her supporting expenses as enumerated in the above subsections of this Section. F. Debt Service Costs, consisting of repayment of principal, payment of interest, and trustee fees and administrative expenses for all applicable bonds, certificates of securities issues or loans. Any required coverage factors of added reserves beyond basic debt service costs shall also be considered a cost if required by covenant within any securities, ordinance, resolution, indenture or general law applicable to the City. 3.1 .04 Schedule of Fee and Service ChpAres, _ A. The City Manager and each City department head, under the direction of the City Manager, shall review the following fees and service charges and provide an adjusted fee or charge schedule to the City Council for its consideration so as to recover the listed percentage of costs reasonably borne necessary to provide the listed regulation, product or service, and to take all actions necessary to accomplish and carry out the policy of the City 2650 DOC 7 Council established by this Chapter. The fees and charges set pursuant to this Chapter shall be established by resolution of the City Council. Percentage of Regulation, Products or Service Costs Reasonably Review Borne to be Schedule Recovered BUILDING SERVICES -Plan Check andj! spf!ction 100% Annual General Plan Review 100% Annual PLANNING SERVICES Concept plan _ _ 100% Annual Art and Public spaces review 100% Annual _q2qceptRan amendment 100% Annual �ffdf ic p!e�n w 100% Annual Specific plan amendrrment 100% Annual CUP- new construction100% Annual -CUP- no new construction 100% Annual CUP-time extension — 100% Annual Revised CUP -construction 100% Annual Revised CUP- no construction 100% Annual CUP"-da 100% Annual Variance-fence committee 87% Annual Variance-SFR 75% Annual Variance-comm, multi family 100% Annual 100% Annual _Building re 100% Annual 100% Annual rn�a >1 acre 100% Annual CRA- minor I acre or less 100% Annual CRA-time extension100% Annual -jitnor cornrnission review---- 100% Annual CRA-revised m' AS 100% Annual M. CRA- revised minor 100% Annual 100% Annual y s2e�arqtf maap � _ Annual Reversion 100% Annual Tentative tract map _1 660-il —A n—nu a-1 Revised tentative tract 100% Annual �ud7ivtsion time extension 100% Annual Lot �qe ,L -------I— -- ----,---- ---..-- 100% Annual _____,,,' , Certificate of com taqqe_ 100% --_—Annual _ Ne at'ye declaratiqn 100% Annual -Environm e n t a I_prqje q_qs_§f s m ent, Residential 100% Annual —,.-------- j9pmnt Aloation RC1,�J. _ILIA alta Dev ra_fio_nq e_of ap_p_�qy'tl_d cLio _L 100,%------,- Annual Annual-- 2650.DOC 3 RDA transfer of develop ent allocation 100% Annual_ _ml qne occu anon errnit;- rev�ewv .._ _ . .w_ 100%, Annual' tin ha e-commission determination 100% Annual Zone Chan e-ordinance text amendment 100%"Q Annual ,bene Chan��' � _ y _. a�.n a _ �_._.100% � Annual _.. a. y ..LL _ _y _.,._ Qne_si n review 100�° Annual._._.m__� Sinrpertti_ 100% Annual 100% Annual Si n review b r ys o f 71% Annual Signp % ro rarn amendment 10010 Annual nu Annual banner permit 5% Annual` dditionalab nn r di "I _. _.4 100% _ ,. Annual Searchli Tm 100% Annual 1lP-signs >10 SF 100% Annual Demolition - SFR > 0 yr;oRd) 100% Annual _ _. _ Demolition 1`tir1Fd Comm„ lndstrl > 01 mold) m _100% Annual Demolition accessory bldg�>50 old 100% Annual Demolition SFR 50 r old} 100% Annual Demolition -_MF, Comm Indstrl a � 100% Annual Demolition-accessory bldg5r old 100°,' Annual Annexation 100% Annual Service plan for annexation 100% Annual m. Pre annexation agreement 100% Annual Agriculture preserve removal 100% Annual peneral_pl n amendment 100% Annual Street vacation 100%® Annual Appeal -Various Fees Paid 100% Annual _ Addendum to planning commission 100% Annual Continued item applicant 100% Annual Verification letter- basic 100% Annual Verification letter- research �W100% Annual Temporary pcc c __ 100% Annual News racy irnpound fee100% Annual Devlo rnent anent ����._._ 100% Annual Williamson Act contract removal 100% Annual Socio Economic tud �M _ ._ a. . .v s. 100% Annual PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING Environmental lmpct Review 100%Q Annual Environmental�.. _ .. _ � �. _ �... .. _. lm act I e +prt py _____M _ 100% Annual Tentative Tract. Tentative 1�� _� 100 f Annual. Revised Tract IV1a 100% Annual Final Tract Ma . �_. � � 100% Annual Tentative Kar l PJI p . 100% Annual -Revised Parcel Map 100% Annual-- Final n _Final Parcel lyla _ . . 1t1t % Annual Conditional Use Kermit100% Annual Commission Review andprcval 100%c; Annual uildir 1Vloerrrrit 100% Annual 2650 00C Lot Line Ad r tm nt 100% Annual _m £ Annual Certificate of orrt alt n # ce n., 100% Annual Street Vacation Subordination AreetentlLten Release 100% Aknnual n wild Permit Residential 100% Annual uslclin .._l�'drrr tt �rrx�r erci �7�/� ll �Commercial/industrial strial _ _ _.. ... m.. . _1 _ ___ . Annual �tldin .Permit- Pentam Addition 100% Annual Plait Check a Precise Gradin -SFR 100% Annual Plan Check- Precise Gr in - i t r rt Base F _ ,. : . _. _100% Annual w _ ..... .. . ._w . Plan Check Precise Gradi -Subdivi ion Leat feta, . �.� - _ ..dw 100% ._.: �n. . Annual Plan Check Precise Grading-; ubdi 't ion Acre Peau _. - 100,%------Annual Plait Check- SWPPP-SFR100% Annual /I P Plan Check W S P -Prrat:E� e Fee 't00% .._.__ w.,.� Annual Plan Check-SWPPP-Subdivision Lot Few _. M _ . _ °1�10%v� � ..� Annual Plan Check-SWPPP-Subdivision,acre Fee _ _ mm _100% Annual"' CCIIP SMP Inection,- Corftlex tProects _� 100% W ,annual WQMP SMP In ae tion ---Standard Prole is .� 100% Annual `C MPasi I+4P jn ectioq bc Pi is 1Ct °do Annual .10 Plan Check- Final WOMP- SFR / ru _ w Plan Check- Final WOMP -Project Sase Fee 100% Annual Plan Check-Final WQMP -Subdivision Lot Fee _ _.100% Annual; Plan Check - Final WOMP- Subdivision Acre Fee 100% Annraal ._ Plan Check-Parcel a - l a Fee 100% ,genual Plan Check -Parcel Map -Lot Fee � � M 100%--- Annual. Plan Check -Parcel Afire Fee 1tf % Artrtal_ Plan Check-Tract M@p-Base Fee100% .Annual Plan Check-Tract Map Lot Fee -_ .. 1{t3% Annual Plan Check-Tracttla t Acre Fee 100% Annual �. .a Plan Check -Street Construction 100% Annual Plan Check -Storm Brains 1 oo Annual ,< Plan Check Street Li -Is_ .. _ 100% Annual Plan Check -Traffic Sinals -1 e In tallations _ 1 Ct0% MpAnnual Plan Check-Traffic Signals Modi1€c�iti+ar� � � �__mom �_. 100% m Annual .. Plan Check--Street Trees 1rt3° Annual_ Plan Check Sig s and Stri in 100% Annual Encroachment Permit- �l�euv � rc�a� 1Ct °l� Ann�ral Encroachment Permit-Sidewalk 100 Annual Encroachment Permit Cross Gutter/ 100%,wn_ _ Annual Encroachment Permit- Curb and Cutter 100% Annual Encroachment Permit-Curb/ Berm �t� �� °r 1 Annual n roar# t Permit®.;Sr sh ate Baseµ m. ;. 100%, ., Annual Encroachment Permit Asphalt Pavement _._ _w..wv._. � ._ _. _.. :.._ 100% w ... . Annual .w Encroachment Permit-Strqet i lit m. ._ 100% Annual Encroachment Permit Traffic ! n t New �.�..-.. w _ 100%n. #.r .. � Ann—ual Encroachment Permit-Traffic `tqqa�-_l o to tion: � w ._ _.. p100% _Annual or~c ed Con100% Annual Encroachment Permit- Reim Concrete u ._ a-.._..� _..��.�_. � d. . _ ncr hm nt Permit _mStorm k rale ?r �._.ryu..ti _ .. . .... m�� µ 100%_..m ._.... Annual�.. Encroachment Permit-_Curb Inlet/Outlet Structures_w ..r._ . _ mw� 100% . ,.. Annual .En r__oac_h,m'e'_n_1, ox _. .. _ 00% _ M Annual Encroachment Permit- Curb Core 100%.. .M real. ._ 26 ;iao a Encroachment Permit -ewerMain .. ..__. I.00% An nul Encroachlent Permit-Sewer uanhce__ w: _ 0__0_% _____ AAnnua1 Encruc�nent__Permm.i_t_-,Sewear leanoit 100% .Annual Encroachment Permit Sewer Lateral 100% Annual Encroachment Permit- Nater lain - Potable 100% Annual Encroachment Permit-Water Dain - 100% Annual Encroachment Permit-Water Service Lateral 100% Annual Encroachment Permit Fire 1-y rant Asserrb __. _�. 100% Annual Encroachment Permit-Water Shutdown 100% Annual Encroachment Permit- Fire Service 100% Annual i Enr+achent Permit-Evatcn Trench,Street Cit 1t1°l Annual Encroachment Permit-Street Patch 100% Annual Encroachment Permit-Proc J Fee 100% Annual trading Permit-SF __._ 100%Q Annual grading Permit-subdiviican Bdse Fee 100% Annual r di Permit-Subdivision Lot Fee 100%o Annual trading Permit-Subdivision Acre Fee 100% Annual Street Tree Permit Street Free Removal 3% Annual Street Tree Permit- Street Tree Trimming 3% Annual Strut Tree Permit-street Tree Planting11% � Annual Street Tree Permit-Street Tree Relocation 11% Annual Street Tree Permit- Processing Fee 7% Annual Permit-Truck Route 100% Annual Permit- Nide Load 7% Annual Permit-Outdoor Kinin -,blew 100% Annual Permit Outdoor Dinin Annual Renewal 100% Annual' Permit Outdoor 100% Annual Permit-Outdoor C isplay Annual Renewal 100%Q Annual Park Reservation-Prospect Farb Sim 30% Annual Park Reservation- Redlands Bowl 18% Annul Park Reservation-Sewell Theatre 1 % Annual Park Reservation-Sylvan Park 18% Annual _Park Reservation-Other Parks � ,. � 18% Annual Street game S!9-Q-Installation � w 100% Annual Stop_Sin M wM _ 100% Anrrua( NP, DES Business tqspection.- Low Risk --..�n.�u�_.— 100% uw Annual I PDESNBusinness ins ectien -_j!qh # i k . . _. M . .. _. __.. 100% ..y Annual 1PS Business laeiar - fvtedium Risk _ 1Jr .y. _ Annual POLICE DEPARTMENT Adult Entertainer perrrti ,_µ .rw...w. _ 100% Annual Ai ort to rd new 100% Annual Air ort gate card renewal0 m mw _ ._ _ u _ 2% Annual False malarm ream � �. 100% Annual Aicy!cle�lieese n , _._ 1g° Annual erre It �_ __ M: _ _ __ . 15% Annual CCS er.mlt renewal _._..�' _ 171 Annual. Fing rip#fir lli w. _ - r SO% Annum 1 assaj th r p trmmt ry '100% Annual 50,unc 6 _Media unit. cpY. rf tape _. _ _ 100°r� Annual iscel anea�us - Perm_ � .. _.m4. w ._ _ _._ l ats 64% Annual Millnaqus pnptos 99% Annual _ % annual °Jehlcle Tpouq4-,all others Annual ehi le rm o nd 100% Annual Visa Clearance 97°l�_. Annual 1. _ _. .U . ..w_ :at cf tl ar . _ _ __.. .. _ .� 13% Annual Co adtlon 24% Annual rmAnimal bearding 26% Annual Cat release-owner 5 % Annual log release-owner 67%n Annual Shelter apprehension r 83% Annual Trap rentals _ . .. 100% Annual FIRE DEPARTMENT TMEN"l Plan Review 100% Annual Plan Check � 7%o Annual Fire Marshal Mandated lnspections 41% Annual False Alarm Responses -fee related 84%af Annualmm Fire Reports -fee related 4% Annual m Prevention lns ections _ � 14% Annual Enlne Company lnsectlans _� 17 Annual Permits 100% Annual Weed Abatement _... _ 6 % Annual Admin fee suppression cost recovery 2% Annual Special Event Standby_ 1 % Annual RECREATION SERVICES Contract Classes 31% Annual Prgg ams-Birthday Partles _ mm 55% Annual Day Cam /bids World 10% Annual Softball- Youth _ .. �., 6% Annual Softball-Adult_ 36% Annual Basketball Youth 13% Seasonal Basketball -Adult 10%© Seasonal Football-Youth 7% Soccer-Adult 32% Seasonal T-Ball-Youth 25% Seasonal 14% _ Annual— Community Ctr. Garage lam�. � .._ _ _ 0�ro Annual _S_e_n_i.o. r..aCe_n._.t�er Rentals wr _,_ .. _._.6_1�. ... Annual Com. Ctr. ntals�p�l�r� _ w w� 4% Annual Sr ToursiE cursions 41% Annual Ball weld Rentals r u_Pn. ..�_. 8% Annual Senior Tran rtat on %; Annual Senior Proarns. ... 19% Seasonal TREASURER Business License-new 96% Annual Business License renewal 92% Annual Yard Sale Permit 96% Annual Returned Check 100% Annual GENERAL CITY Generales Copies of Public records _ 100% Annual Mission Gables Bowl House Janitorial Few . � _ �u 100% m Annual L113RARY`SERVICES Late Book Return_/Book LassC�°�'� _ _ 1 � Annual �sery tion of Library Materials 100% annual B The regulations, products and services listed in this Section shall be as defined in that certain document entitled "General Fund User Fee Study Finding — City of Redlands," dated November 2006, as produced by Public Resource Management Croup,LLCM, and as updated by City staff, except for library Services and Mission tables Bowl blouse fees which are based upon studies prepared or obtained by staff. The "General bund User Fee Study" is hereby adopted in its entirety. C. All fees and charges established pursuant to this Chapter shall take effect as provided by law, and as more specifically provided by resolution of the City Council. 3.16.050 Public i leetina 1 Hearing.- Pursuant to California Government ernment Code Sections 6601 and 66018, or other statutory requirement, the City Clerk shall cause notice to be provided as set out in Government Code Sections 66016, 66018 and 6062a, and the City Council periodically, and at least annually, shall receive at a regularly' scheduled meeting oral and written presentations concerning fees and charges proposed to be established or increased, Such notice, oral and written presentation and public meeting shall be provided prior to the City Council taking any action on any new or increased fees or changes.. 3.16.060 Provision of Data. At least ten(1 days prior to the rewired public hearing' set out herein, the City Clerk shall make available to the public data indicating the oast o estimated cost required to support the fees and charges for which charges are proposed to be made or fees and charges imposed. 2650,DOC .16. X70 Actual Cost,Deposits, Collection of Additional Mone and Refunds. A. Actual cost for a regulation, product, service or project is determined by the affected department heads, used upon the criteria set forth in Section 8,1 ,030 of this Chapter. B. Initial deposits are determined by the amount of time historically spent on similar projects, Whenever seventy-five percent (75%) of a deposit has been expended and the department determines that the estimated actual cost of the project or service will exceed the amount deposited, an additional deposit of such estimated excess amounts shall be required, When an additional deposit has been requested, work will be suspended on the project or service when eighty percent(80%)of the deposit previously received has been expended." Section 2. Severability. If any portion of this ordinance is found to be unconstitutional or invalid, the City Council hereby declares that it would have enacted the remainder of this ordinance regardless of the absence of any such invalid part. Section 3. Effective Date, This ordinance shall be in force and take effect as provided by law. Section 4. CEQA Exemption, The City Council hereby finds and determines that the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CE A) pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080(b)(8)(1)because this ordinance approves and establishes a procedure for the purpose of meeting the operating expenses of the City. Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once in the Redlands Daily Facts, a newspaper of general circulation printed and published in this City. Z ",.Mayor of the City of Redlands ATTEST. Citytlerk 2650,DOC 9 1, Borrie Poyzer, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, hereby certify that the forgoing ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of December, 2006 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Gilbreath, Gil, Gallagher, Aguilar; Mayor Harrison NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Borrie Poyzer, Ci fierC 2650.DOC 10 PRM GENERAL FUND USER, FEE STUDY FINDINGS CITY OF R EDLANDS NOVEMBER,2006 1380 Lead 'Mil � ,t_lO& Ro, cv>._e, CA 95661 ..le. 916-677-4233 Fax: 916-677-2283 TABLE CONTENTS OF Section Page |. Executive Summary l Introduction l Study Scope&Objectives l Study Findings 2 Methodology 4 Economic&Policy Considerations 6 Recovery Level Comparison 7 Highlights&Wotes 8 11. Building Division Summary Results 9 !U. Planning Division Summary Results l| !V. Public Works'Engineering Division Summary Results 20 V. Rdkr Department Summary Results 29 V!. Fire Department Summary Results 33 V||. Recreation Division Summary Results 39 V!||. Treasurer Summary Results 42 |%. Hourly Rates and Citywide Copy Charges 45 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Public Resource Management Group (PRM) is pleased to present the City of Redlands (City) with this summary of findings for the cost of services study for fee-related activities. The city has not undertaken a detailed cast of services study since the mid 1990"s. Since that time, the City has made some minor adjustments to the original calculations, but has largely maintained the fee structure that had been adopted. The City is interested in accurately reporting the true cost of providing various fee-related services, and exploring the possibilities of modifying current fees to Fetter reflect the increasing cast of providing services over time. The City contracted with PRN to perform this cost analysis using the adopted 2006-2007 fiscal year budget and staffing information. Additionally. all other staff"information was provided through the period ending September 2006. Fees should be reviewed on a regular basis and adjusted in accordance with established city policies on user fee cost recovery. Typically a detailed study, such as this, is undertaken every 3-5 years with CPI adjustments in the intervening years. This report is the culmination of Mork between PRIM and City management and staff. PRM would like to take thisopportunity to acknowledge all city management and staff who participated on this project for their efforts and coordination.. Their responsiveness and continued interest in the outcome of this study contributed greatly to the success of this study. STUDY SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES This study included a review of fee-for-service activities''within the following departments/divisions-' • Building • Planning • Engineering' • Police • Fire • Recreation • Treasurer The study was performed under the general direction of the Finance Director with the participation of the above-mentioned departments and divisions. The primary goats of the study were to: • Define what it costs the city to provide various fee-related services. • Determine whether there are any opportunities to implements new fees. • Identify service areas where the City might adjust fees based on the full cast of services and other economic or policy considerations. • Develop revenue projections based on recommended increases (car decreases) to fees. The information summarized in this report addresses each of these issues and provides the City with the tools necessary to make informed decisions about proposed fee adjustments and the resulting impact on general fund revenues. 1 of 52 11JDY F[NDING While the purpose of this study is to identify the cost of fee-related activities, one of the outcomes of the analysis: is to provide a complete picture of the full cost of all services offered. It is necessary to;identify olt costs,whether fee-related or not, so that there is a fair distribution of all citywide and departmental overhead costs (discussed in the following section of this report) across all activities, thereby ensuring a definitive relationship between the cost of the service and the fee that is charged. No service-should be burdened with casts that cannot be directly or indirectly linked to that service. Therefore, the first task in this study is to separate the fee-for-service activities from the non-fee activities. Some non-fee related activities are appropriately funded by general fund monies (or other special revenue or impact fee sources), such as most public safety services or capital improvement projects. The casts of these other services are identified and set aside from the user fee services. Exhibit 1 below displays the split of the total costs of each department (including citywide and departmental overhead) into either user fee-related or other service;costs. Of the $46 million in total costs analyzed, $7.6 million (or 17%) of that total is related to user fee services. It is this $7.6 million that is the focus of this study and represents the total potential for user fee-related revenues for the City. Exhibit I Total Cost Source-Fiscal Year 006=2007 Building $1,323,693 $1,204,833 91% $118,860 9% Planning, $1,486,616 $1,107,496 74% $379,120 26% Engineering $2,719,913 $1,582,613 58/0 $1,137,300 42% Police $23,757,654 $780,670 3% $22,976,984 97% Fire $13,315,253 $1,027,556 8% $12,287„697 92% Recreation $2,275,775 $1,760,194 77% $515,581 23% Treasurer $707,734 $185,966 26% $521,768 74% Total. $45,586,638 $7,649,328 17% $37,937,310 The next exhibit(fallowing page) identifies the source of funds:for the user fee services. Exhibit 11 breaks down the $7,6 million in user fee services between costs that are currently recovered through user fee charges and;the remaining subsidy. Overall, the City is experiencing a 531116 cast recovery level for its fee-related services. Within each department, current cost recovery levels range from 5%for Treasurer to 100'3/o for Building. The information about individual fees may be found in subsequent sections of this report. Please nate that the Building revenue displayed is average revenue received over the last twelve years. 2of52 Exhibit 11 Source of Funds User Fere Activities Source-Fiscal Year 2006-2007 Building $1,204,833 $1,1 MASS 1 $5,375 % Planning $1,107,496 $865,930 $241,566 22% Engineering $1,582,613 $884,200 $695,413 44% Police $780,670 $614,860 7 $165,820 21`" Fire $1,027,666 $222,117 22 $806,439 78% Recreation $1,760,194 $274,921 1 $1,485,273 84°la Treasurer 181 ,4 6 $176,476 95% Total: $7,649,828 $4,070,966 53° $3,538„862 47% Exhibit 11 indicates that user fees recover 53%of full cost, leaving 47010 or $3.57$,362 to be funded by ether funding sources. This $3.6 million represents"a „window of opportunity' for the city to increase fees and general fund revenues, with a corresponding decrease in the subsidization of services by the General Fund, While it is not likely (nor would F'Rlvl recommend) that the City completely recover all costs through increased or new fees, it is possible for the City to implement moderate increases to current fees and new fees for some services. The study's primary objective is to provide the City's decision-makers with basic data needed for setting fees. This report details the full cost of services, and presents proposed fees and projected revenues based on recommended user fee cost recovery levels. Recommendations were based upon careful consideration of the results of the cost analysis, historical cost recovery levels, and market comparisons of other cities. 3of52 Exhibit IH below summarizes the financial analysis of the City's user fee program performed by PRM- It is estimated that adoption of the recommended cost recovery policy would increase the specified fee revenue by $1,302,995 (a 32% increase over the revenue currently being collected for these activities by the City on an annualized basis). This would bring the overall cost recovery level up to 700/c,for these activities. Exhibit III User Fee Revenue: Analysis Recommended Revenues — Source-Fiscal Year 2006-200 Revenues Building $1,204,833 $5,375 0% $1,199,458 100% $1,199,458 1170% 0 0% Planning $1,107,496 $241,566 22% $665,930 78% $1,094,856 99% $228,926 26% Engineering $1,582,613 $698,413 44% $884,200 56% $1,515,698 96% $631,698 71% Police $780„676 $165,820 21% $614,850 79% $759,545 97% $141,695 24% Fire $1,027,556 $805,339 78% $222,117 22% $341,467 33% $119,350 54% Recreation $1,760,194 $1,485;273 84%m $274,921 16% $287,787 16% $12,866 5% Treasurer $185,966 $176,476 95% $9,490 5% $174,950 94% $165,460 1744% t 7. 9,328 ,578, 2 47% $4,070,966 53%a $5;373,961 70%1 $1,302,995 32% METHODOLOGY A cast of service study analyzes two components of costs: the direct costs associated with providing each fee- for-service activity, and the indirect casts that support these activities. A brief discussion of each of these components follows. (A complete, detailed report of calculations is provided as an attachment to this report). Direct Casts. The direct costs associated with fee-for-service activities were analyzed in great detail in this study. PRM worked with staff within each of the seven divisions to develop the analysis that is summarized in the following sections of this report. The fiscal year 2006-2007 adapted budget was used to identify direct costs, The first step in the process was to identify staff time spent directly on each of the user fee activities. Each staff person involved in the user fee services identified time spent to complete each task associated with all user fee services. Annual volume statistics were also gathered in order to develop total annual workload information_ Salary and benefit dollars were assigned to the time estimates to come up with the direct staff costs. Indirect Costs. A proportionate share of other operating expenses and internal department administrative costs were:layered onto the direct costs as a departmental overhead. Citywide overhead costs coming from the cost allocation plan (described below) were also added in as indirect overhead. These two items were components of the indirect casts: 1) departmental overhead, and 2) citywide overhead. The cost of each activity is then compared to the fee currently charged, and the extent of cast recovery is identified. Cost Allocation _Plan. Many;of the costs that support all city prograrns and services are budgeted in centralizedactivities such as 1) Finance, which provides payroll, budgeting, accounting and information systems support. 2) Building Maintenance, which provides building maintenance and custodial services, and 3) City Manager, which provides human resource and general government support services. The costs of these 4 4f 52 activities and other centralized services are considered indirect overhead that support fee-for-service activities, as well as other programs and functions within the city. As part of this study. PRM developed an indirect cost allocation plan that identifies and distributes these indirect costs to all operating programs and functions within the city's organizational structure. The cost allocation plan takes a detailed approach to analyzing indirect costs. PRM interviewed staff and analyzed data within each central activity to determine: L What indirect support functions are provided (e.g, payroll, legal services, civic center maintenance, etc). 2. How to allocate centrally budgeted personnel and other operating expenses into these functions. 1 Which departments receive benefit from these services (e.g. payroll services benefit all departments that have budgeted staff, City Hall maintenance benefits all departments that are housed within City Hall). 4. How to identify the best method of allocating these costs to the users (e.g. payroll services are allocated based on the number of personnel in each department). The end result Of this analysis is the allocation of all indirect costs to all operating departments and programs. The indirect costs are then added to the direct costs to determine the full cost of call city operations—whether fee-related or not. This accounting exercise is important in that it can result in an increase in general fund revenues for reimbursement of support for user fee services and state or federally funded programs. The next section is a discussion about economic and policy considerations later in this report which may help facilitate the discussion on what cost recovery levels are appropriate for Redlands. To assist in that discussion, PRM offers the following comments relative to what we have seen in other agencies: • Development-related fees (planning and building) generally should have high cost recovery levels (at or close to 100%). Exceptions may be made for services such as appeal fees, or those provided exclusively to residential applicants. • Recreation and other community services fees generally have very moderate cost recovery levels. Many programs continue to be provided free of charge, regardless of cost. Youth and seniors programs tend to have the lowest cost recovery levels (15% to 25%). Day care programs generally recover 100% of cost. Miscellaneous classes tend to have moderate cost recovery levels (35%to 50%). and adult sports programs have higher cost recovery levels (45%to 60%). • No fee should be set higher than 100% cost recovery, without disclosure about the reasons why (e.g. a fine or penalty element, or the acknowledgement of one activity subsidizing another). • If the proposed fee increase is significant. many agencies will opt to phase in the increase over a period of three to five years. • Comprehensive reviews-should be undertaken every three to five years, with minor cost of living adjustments made on an annual basis. 5 of 52 ECONOMIC & POLICY CONSIDERATIONS Calculating the true cost of providing city services is a critical step in the process of establishing user fees and corresponding cost recovery levels. Although it is the most important factor, other factors must also be given consideration. City decision-makers must also consider the effects that establishing fees for services will have on the individuals purchasing those services, as well as the community as a whole. The following economic and policy issues help illustrate these considerations. It may be a desired policy to establish fees at a level that permits lower income groups to participate in services that they might not otherwise be able to afford. A consideration of community-wide benefit versus specific benefit should be considered for certain services (e.g. teen after-school programs). In conjunction with the second point above, the issue of who is the service recipient versus the service driver should also be considered. For example, code enforcement activities benefit the community as a whole. but the service is driven by the individual or business owner that violates city code. • Elasticity of demand is a factor in pricing certain city services. increasing the price of some services results in a reduction of demand for those services, and vice versa. • Public sector agencies have a monopoly on providing certain services within its boundaries, such as development-related services. However, other services. such as recreation leagues and classes. may be provided by neighboring communities, and therefore demand for these services can be highly dependent on what else may be available at lower prices. • Pricing services can encourage or discourage certain behaviors. Some examples of this would be to establish a low fee for a water heater permit to encourage homeowners to ensure their water heater is properly installed, or setting false alarm response fees on an incremental scale to discourage multiple false alarm calls. • It may be impractical to establish a cost recovery system for some services or the collection of fees may be costly and difficult to administer. Some of the fees that are charged after a service has been provided might fail under this category, for example. false alarm response fees and code enforcement violations. 6 of 52 COST RECOVERY COMPARISONS The chartbelow displays various city recovery levels. These numbers were talon from recent PRM clients. In order to provide Redlands with the greatest "apples to apples" comparison. please nate that these clients have« undertaken the same study as Redlands. using the same processes and methodologies. PLANNING ENGINLDUNG Recovery rates Recovery rates current' recommended current recommended Campbell 26010 50% Campbell 55% 63% Chino Hills; 12% 50% Chino Hills 7% 66% Cupertino nla 100% Cupertino nla 100% Emeryville 3401014(7°1� Emeryville $1% 144010 Huntington Beach 8310 1(7{}ffi/0 Huntington Beach 7 0� 1G7b% La Habra 51%,. n%a La Habra 29% nla La Mesa 19% 50% La Mesa 4101x'' 100% Long Beach '71010 940!0 Lang Beach 53% Luo Alamitos 7% 5 % Los Alamitos 24% 920 Los Cates 65% 100% Los Gatos 91% 100% Placer County n1a 140% Placer County n/a 144% Whittier 410 74% Whittier 52% 1467% Pittsburg 19% 49% Pittsburg 78% 82% Banta Barbara 380 n1a Santa Barbara 620 n'a POLICE RECRE4770N Recovery rates Recovery rates carrent recommended current recommended Folsom 15% 68% Antioch` 69% 69% Hollister' 61% 98010 ... Folsom 44010 44% Huntington Beach 69% 79010 Hollister 646% 74% La Habra 10% n/a Huntington Beach 620 463 Lernoore 52010 87% Irvine 28% n1a Los Alamitos 39% 707010 La Habra 48% n1a Long Beach96°10 ^ Long Beach 44% 59°10 ittier ....64°J0 r ..__... .. 7C16l0 Los Alamitos 55% __.56% ._ _.. . ....._ ..___.a. .. Pittsburg 59% 62% e La Mesa 41% 41% Banta Barbara 32010 nat in scope ......... Whittier 21% 29% Pittsburg 26'30 29% Santa Barbara 43% not inscope HRE Recovery rates current recommended Folsom 29% 144% Hollister 47% 990 Huntington Beach 56010 69010 La Habra 22010 n1a. Lang Beach 9401® 94% Lernoore7301014{3% 01, Modesto 42 ,. 144% . 7of52 HIGHLIGHTS & NOTES ■ The Building analysis was done on a program level basis. Due to the cyclical nature of the building industry, a historical average was used for the revenue comparison. No adjustments to the current Building fee structure are being recommended. • The Planning analysis was conducted on a per application/permit basis. Adjustments were made to a significant number of Planning fees, including a cost reduction in approximately 30 fees. If all Planning recommendations are implemented, the city could potentially recover an additional $228,926 in general fund revenues. • The Engineering division has completely revised their fee structure. Staff felt that the current model did not accurately reflect their current services. Therefore, additional fees have been created along with the elimination of rarely used categories. The new fee adjustments could bring the Engineering recovery level up to 96%. • Recreation is not making any current recommendations for fee adjustments. Fees were adjusted a few months ago in various adult sports. For presentation purposes, the additional revenue from those adjustments has been included in this report. The analysis for Recreation was done on a program level. • The Police analysis was done on a per application basis and did not result in any new fees. Many fees charged by the Police department are set by other jurisdictions. Therefore, only minor changes were made to the Police fee schedule. • The Fire analysis was also done on a program level basis and did result in a number of fee adjustments. If all fee recommendations are implemented a potential $119.350 in additional revenue could be recognized. ■ The Treasurer's analysis was focused around two fees which currently have no fee associated with them. These two services were resulting in a general fund subsidy of approximately $160.000. Fees are being recommended in an attempt to reduce the general fund subsidy. The following pages display the summary results of each department/divisions analysis. Because the analysis for Building. Recreation and Fire were done on a program level basis. the results are displayed in annual form. The results for Planning, Engineering, Police and Treasurer are displayed on both a per-unit basis and an annual summary. 8 of 52 BUILDING SUMMARY RESULTS ANNUAL RESULTS ONLY 9 of 52 Agency City of Redlands Department: Building Fiscal Year: 2006107 Reco mendalr= ns Service Name Service Revenue @ %of Full Cast Revenue @ 100% Current Subsidy Cost Recovery% Revenue @ Increased age Current Fee Full Cost Recomm Level Revenue 1 Plan Check&Inspection Fee $1,199,458 100% $1,204,833 $5,375 100% $1,199,458 $0 10 Support to Enr3r X-Suppt $0 0% $2,365 $2,365 0% $o $0 11 Support to Planning X-$uppt $0 p $8,807 $8,8070 0 $0 12 Support to Fire X- uppt $0 0% $6,389 $6,389 0% $0 $0 13 Support to MUD X-suppl $0 0% $2,365 $2,365 0% $0 $0 16 Code Enforcement Non Fee _ $0 0%': $1,183 $1,183 0% $0 $0 17 General plan Review Surcharge $100,000 102%1 $97,751L-- _�$2,2491. 102% $100,1)00 $01 Total User Fees $1,199,458 $1,204,833 $5,375 $1,199,158 $0 cs %of Full Cost 100% 100% 0% 100% 0% c> cap Total tither Services $100,000 $118,860 $18,860 $100,000 $0 %of Full Cost 84% 100% 16% 84% 0% Department Totals $1,299,458 $1,323,693 $24,235 $1,299,458 0 %of Full Cost 98%- 100% 2% 98%, 0% Please note the;revenue listed for plan check and inspection represents the average revenue over the past 12#'scat yyaars. PLANNING SUMMARY RESULTS PER UNIT AND ANNUAL.SUMMARIES 11 of 52 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET PFFD UNIT INFORMATION- City of badlands Planning 200612007 Recarr mmdafions Service Name Service Annual Current Fee %of Full Cast 100%of Full Current Cost Recovery Fee(„sa Policy Subsidy @ Policy 'Type Volume Cost Subsidy Policy Level % Level Level 1 Concept plan Fee 1 $9,630 155% $6,226 -$3,404 100% $6,225 $1 a) 2 Art&Public spacesruw Newfee 40 $0 0% $1,782 $1,752 100%. $1,784 $2' 4 Concept plan amendment Fee 1 $1,800 68% $2,647 $847 100% $2,645 $2' 6 Specific plan Pee 1 $13,040 222% $5;862 -$7,138 104% $5,860 $2' 7 Specific plan amendment Fee 5 $1,800 66% $2,748 $948 144% $2,750 m$2 8 CUP-new const. Fee 13 $4,450 91% $4,894 $4444 100% $4,895 -$1 9 CUP-no now const, Fee 10 $1,900 121% $1;571 -$329 104% '$1,570 $1 14 CUP-time ext. Fee 3 $65 44% $149 $84 101% $150 -Si 11 Revised CUP-const- Fee 5 $2,770 12296 $2,266 _$5D 1010%: $2,265 $1 ria 12 Revised CUP-no const, Fee 2 $1.375 121% $1;144 $235 100% $1,140 $0 13 CUP-daycare horns 13+clients Fee 1 $1,254 721m CA Y ° $1,734 $484 100% $1,730 $4' 14 Variance-fence committee Fee 41 $3Fi0 78% $459 $99 87 $400 $59 15 Variance-SFR Fee- 15 $1,000 500,k, $2;008 $1,408 75% $1,5 $508 16 Variance-Comm,multi 6rtwly Fee 6 $1,775 79% $2;244 $469 100% $2,240 $4 17 Variance-parking rood Fee 1 $800 63% $1,273 $473 10G% $1,270 $3 18 Suildrnrg moving-main structure Deposit 1 $1, 83% $1,207 $207 100% $1„205 $2 19 Building moving-garagefsecondary stictre Deposit 1 $1,004 88% $1.134 $134 100% $1,130 $4 20 CRA-major;*l acre Fee 15 $3,850 71% $5;458 $1,508 100% $5,464 $2 21 CRA-minor 1 acre or less Fee 5 $2,395 57%11.. $4,181 $1,786' 104% $4,180 $1 2 CRA-time ext Fee 1 65 44% $149 $84' 101% $150 _$1 23 Minor commission review Fee 1 $840 56% $1,418 $618 100% $1,415 .. _ $3 24 CRA-revised major Fee 4 $2,050 47% $4,379 $2,329 100% $4384 -$1 25 CRA,-revised minor Fee 4 $1,104 29% $3,744 $2,644 100%1 $3 745 $1 ICV31/2W6 Public Resource Management Group Fuge i of 8= USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET City of Redlands Planning 200612007 Recommendations Service Name Service Annual Current Fee %of Full Cost 100%of Full Current Cost Recovery Fee @ Policy SubsWy @ Policy Type Volume Cost Subsidy Policy Level % Level Laval 26 Parcei map Fee 8 $2:754 75% $3,650 $900 100°0 $3650 $0 27 Revised parcel map Fee 1 $2,100 73% $2,869 $769 100% $2,870 •$t 28 Reversion toacreayeimerger Fee 1 $1,525 76% $2,009 $484' 100% $2,010 -$1 29 Tentative tract wrap Fee 13 $4,6{10 50% $9,143 $4,543 100% $9,140 $3 30 Revased tent tract map Fee 1 $2,750 45% $6,067 $3.317 100% $6,065 $2 31 Suodvsn time ext Fee 2 $235 158% $149 $86' 101% $150 .$1 32 Lot fine adjustment Fee 19 $525 113% $464 -$61 140%' .$465 -$1 33 Corr of compliance Fee 1 $525 102% $517 $8' 100% $515 $2' 34 Negativedeclaration Fee 57 $2,750 66% $4,170 $1,420 100% $4,170 $0 35 Envrnmtt project assessment Fee 8 $500 89% $60 100% $560 $0 36 Residential Development Allocation(RDA) Fee 10 $4,350 206% $2,115 -$2,235 100% $2,115 $0 r 37 RDA-alteration of appivd project Fee 1 $2,620 608% $431' -$2,189 100%.. $430 $1 38 RDA-imsfr of dev allocation Fee 1 $320 836/o $385 $65 100% $385 $a 39 Mame occupation pant•roview Fee 267 $25 90 $28 $:3 100% $28 $0 42 Zone Change-comm determination Fee 1 $1,800 114% $1,672 -$228 100%' $1,670 $2' 43 Gane Change-ord text amend Fee 6 $1,900 97% $1,968 $68' 100% $1,865 $3 44 Zone Change Fee 12 $3,300 122% $2,696 -$6014 100% $2,695 $1 45 One sign review Fee 19 $390 80% $490 $100 1W% $490 $0 46 Sign program Fee 1 $1,240 111% $1,116 -$124' 100% $1,115 $1 47 Flag test Fee 1 $350 33% $1,071 $721 100% $1,070 $1 48 Sign review by staff' Fee 81 $35 315% $99 $64 71% $70 $29 49 Sign program amendmni Fee 1 $745 125.6 $598 $147 1090% $600 $2 50 Annual banner permit Fee 22 $45 48% $95 $50 85% $80 $15 10131/2006 Public Resource Management Group Page 2 of 8 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET PER UNIT INFORMATION-" City of Redlands Planning 200612007 Recommendations Service!lame service Annual Current Fee of Full Cast 100%of Full current Cast Recovery Fee @ Policy Subsidy @ Policy Type Volume Cost Subsidy PO!Lcy,Level Level Level 51 Additional banner display Fee 1 $15 30% $49 $34 101% $50 �l 52 Searchlights Fee 1 $35 37% $95 $60 100% $95 $0 3 CUP signs>120SF Fee 1 $1,900 121% $1;576 -$324 100% $1,575 $1 54 Demolition-SFR(>50 yr old) Fee 5 $975 140% $699 -$276 100% $700 $1 55 Demolition-MF,Comm,Indstri(>50 yr old) Fee 1 $990 143% $691 -$299 100% $690 $3 6 Demolition-accessory btdg(>50 yr old) Fee- 20 $300 63% X480 $180 100% $480 $0 57 Demolition-SFR(<60 yr old) Fee 1 $500 162% $308 -$192 101% $310 -$2 58 Demolition-MF,Comm,Indstrt(<50 yr old) Fee 1 $500 156% $320 -$180 100% $320 $0 59 Demolition-accessory bldg(<50 yr old) Fee 1 $250 74% $338 101% $340 -$2 60 Annexation Fee 2 $7,775 95% $8;204 $429 100% $8,205 $1 61 Service plan for annexation Fee 1 $2,000 243% $983 -$1.017 100°6 $980 $3 cn 62 Pre annexaUrin agreement Fee _5 $3,Ot 1 165% $1,815 41,185 100% $1,815 $0 63 A rcltl preserve removal Fee 4 $2,050 119% $1,728 $322' 100% $1.730 -$2 64 General plan arrmndmnt Fee 5 $5,200 144% $3;603 _$1,597 100% $3,605 $2' b) 65 Street vacation Fee 1 $2,745 139% $1;977 -$768' 100% $1,975 $2 66 Appeal-Various Fees Paid Fee 8 $2.145 139% $1;548 •$597' 100% $1,550 -$2 61 Addendum to plan comm Fee 10 $740 97% $760 $20 100`#,' $760 $4 68 Continued item by applicant Fee 1 $185 83% $223 $38' 101% $225 -$2 69 Verification letter-basic Fee 20 $50 18% $290 $230 100% $280 $0 70 Verification letter-rstch Fee 1 $140 28% $499 $359 100%' $500 -$1 71 Temp occupancy Fee 1 $180 121% $148 4 2' 101% $150 $2 72 News rack impound tee Fee 1 $100 36% $274 $174 1003% $275 $1 r7 '13 Development agreement Deposit 2 $10,900 231% $4,320 -$5.6880 100% $4,320 $0 74 Williamson Act contract removal Deposit 2 $500 25%1 $2,021 $1,52"1 100%` $2,020 $1 75 Socio Economic Stud Fee 40 $2,,5001_, 108% $2,308 _$192 100`l $2,310 -$2 1013112006 Public Resource Management Group Mage 3 of 8 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET PER UNIT INFORMATION City of Redlands Planning 061 007 Recommend fions :service Name service Annual Current Fee %of Full Cost 100%of Full Currem Gast Recovery Fee @ Policy Subsidy @ Policy ---Iype Volume Gorst Subsidy Mali Level Level Level 77 Long Range Planning Non fee 1 $0 0% $97,751 $97,751 0 $0 $97,751 80 Support to Building Support 1 $0 0% $18,344 $18,344 0% $0 $19,344 84 All other activity Non fee 1 $0 0% $263,W4 $253„024 0 $0 $263,024 5) This fee will be ifnplo"irwed only if the ArI and Public Spaces arr7inzince is approved b) Induces adveinsing casts, C) Does not rnclaar &rect`City Attrirney costs: a 10131/2006 Public Resource Management:Group Page 4 of 8 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET -TOTAL.PROGRAM (INFORMATION City of Redlands Planning 2006/2007 Recommendations Service Name Service Revenue of Full Cast Revenue 100% currant Subsidy east Recovery Revenuer Policy 011creased F e Current Fee Full Cast Level Revenue< I Concept plan Fee $9,630 155%: $6,226 $3,404 100% $6,225 43,405 2 ArtBPlrltlocspaces rvwt ffewfee $0 0% $71,289 $71,289 100y $71,200 $71,2130 4 Concept plan amendment Fee $1,800 68% $2,647 $847 100% $2,645 $845 6 Specific plan Fee $13,000 222% $5,862 -$7,138 1 $5,960 «$7,140 7 Specific plan amendment Fee $9,000 Fib $13,738 $4,738 100% $13,750 $4350 8 CUP-new const, Fee $57,850 91% $63,616 $5,766 100% $63,635 $5,785= 9 CUP-no new const Fee $19,000 121% $15,713 -$3,287 100% $15,700 -$3.300 10 CUP-time ext Fee $195 44% $447 $252 101% $4450 $255 11 Revised CUP-const Fee $13,850 122% $11,330 -$2,520 100% $11.325 -$2,525 12 Revised CUP-no const. Fee $2,750 121% $2279 -$471 100% $2,280 -$470' 13 CUP_daycare home(13+clients) Fee $1.250 72% $1,734 $484 1009° $1.730 $480 14 Variance-fence committee Fee $14,760 78% $18,822 $4,062 87% $16,400 $1,640 15 Variance-SFR Fee $15,000 50% $30.113 $15,113 75% $22,500 $7.500 16 Variance.Comm,multi flatly Fee $10,650 79' $13,462 $2,812 100% $13,440 $2,790 17 Variance-parking mod Fee $800 63% $1,273 $473 100% $1,276 $470 18 Building movin€7-main structure Deposit $1. 83%° $1,207 $207 100% $1,205 $205 19 Building moving-garagetsecond"st Deposit $1,00088% $1,134 $134 100% $1,130 $130 20 CRA-major>1acre Fee $57,750 73% $81,872 $24,122 10085 $81,. $,24,150 1 CRA-minor 1 acre at less Fee $11.975 57% $20.905 $8,930 100% $20,800 $8,925 2:2 CRA-time ext Fee $65' 44% $149 101% $150 $85 23 Mmor commission review Fee $800 56% $1,416 $618 100% $1.415 $615 24 CRA-revised major Fee $8,200' 47% $17,517 $9,317 100% $17,520 $9,320 25 CRA•revised minor Fee $4 400 29% $14,975 $10 575 100% $14,980 $10,580 1013112006 Public Resource Management Group Page 5 of 8 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET -TOTAL PROGRAM INFORMATION- City of Redlands Planning 2006/2007 Re ommenct tions Service Name Service Revenue @ %of Full Gast Revenue 100% Current Subsidy Gast Recovery Revenue @ Policy Increased 1ype Current Fee Full Cost Policy Leven'% Level Revenue 26 Parce&map Fee $22,000 75 125.202 $7,202 100% $29,200 $7,200 27 Revised parcel map Fee $2,100 73% $2,869 $769 100% $2,870 $770 28 Revorsoorr to acreragelmerger Fee $1,525 76% $2,009 100% $2,010 $485 29 fent ave tram map Fee $5900 50% $118,853 $59,053 100% $118,820 $59,020 30 Revises tent tract map Fee $2,7510 45% $6,067 $3,317 100% $6,065 $3,315 31 Subdvsn time ext Fee $470 158% $298 $172 101% $300 -$170 32 Lot line adjustment Fee ,$9,975 113% $8,813 -$1,162 100% $8,835 .$1,140 33 Cert of compliance Fee $525 102% $517 $8 100% $515 -$10 34 Negatives declaration Fee $156,750 66% $233,681 $80,931 100% $237.690 $80,940 35 Fnvrr nif project assessment Fee $4,000 89% $4,482 $482 1 $4,480 $480 0 361 ResldenhaiDevelopmentAllocation( Fee $43,500 206% $21,154 _$22,346 100% $21,150 $22,350 Or 37 RDA-alteration of apprvd project Fee $2,620 60899 $431 $2,189 100°x, $430 -$2,190: 8 RCCA-trnsfr of dev,allocation Fee $320 83% $385 $65 100% $385 $65' 39 Home occupation print-review Fee $6,675 90% $7,451 $776 1 $7,476 $801 42 Zone Change-comm determination Fee $14900 114%'4 $1,672 $228 100% $1:670 -$2$0 43 Zone Change-and text amend Fee $11,400 97% $11,808 $408 100% $11,790 $390' 44 Zone Change Fee _ $39,600 122% $32,347 -$7,253 100% $32,340 -$7,260' 45 One sttnn review Fee $7,410 80% $9,301 $1 A91 100% $9,310 $1,500 46 Srgnprogram Fee $1,240 111% $1,116 -$124 100% $1,115 -$125' 47 Flag test Fee $350 33% $1,071 $721 100% $1.070 $720 48 Sign review by staff Fee $2,835 35% $7,999 $5.164 71% $5,670 $2,835 49 Sign program arnendrnnt Fee $745 125% $598 -$147 _. 100% - $$00 -$1451: 50 Anrrtstttbanner it Foe $990 48% $2080 $1,890 8596` $1.760 $770 1013112006 Public Resource Management Group Page 6 air a USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET -TOT'AL.PROGRAM INFORMATION City of Redlands Planning 200612007 Recommendations Service blame Service Revenue @ %of Full Cost Revenue @ 100% Current Subsidy Cost Recovery Revenue @ Policy increased Type Current Fee Full Cost Poac Level,JN Level Revenue 51 Additional banner display Fee $15 3D% $49 $34 101% $50 $35 52 Searchlights Fee $35 37% $95 $60 100% $95 $60 53 CUP-signs>120 SF Fee $1,900 121% $1,576 $324 100% $1,575 x$325 54 Demolition-SFR(>50yr old) Fee $4,875 140'% $3494 41,381 100% $3,500 41,375 55 Demolition-MF,Comm,Indstrl(>50 y Fee $990 143% $651 $299 100% $690 -$300 56 Demolition-accessory bldg(>50 yr ok Fee $6.000 63% $9,590 $3,590 100% $9,600 $3,600 57 Demolition-SFR(<50 yr old) Fee $500 162%x' $308 -$192 101% $310 -$190 58 Demolition-MF,Comm,Indstrl(<50 y Fee $500 156% $320 -$180 100% $320 -$180 59 Demolition-accessory bldg(<50 yr o4c Fee $250 74% $338 $88 101%, $340 $90 60 Annexation Fee $15550 95%' $16,408 $858 100% $16,410 $860 61 Service plan for annexation Fee $2,000 203% $983 -$1,017 100% $980 -$1,020 62 Pre annexation agreement Fee $15.000 165% $9,076 _ 45,924 100% $9;075 -$5,025' 63 Agrelfl preserve rermvai Fee $8.200 119% $5,911 .$1,289 100%5 $6.920 -$1,280 64 Genera$plan arnndmnt Fee $26,000 144%: $18,017 .$7,983 10096 $18:025 -$7,975 65 Streetvacation Fee $2,745 139% $1,977 $768 100% $1,975 -$770 66 Appeal-Various Fees Pard Fee $17,160 139% $12,381 •$4,779 100`§0 $12,400 -$4,760 67 Addendum to plan comm Fee $7,400 97%. $7,605 $205 100% $7;500 $200 68 Continued item by applicant Fee $185 83ut; $223 $38 101% $225 $40 69 Verification letter-baste Fee $1,000 18% $5,599 $4,599 100% $5,600 $4,600: 70 Verifict flan letter.,rsrch Fee $140 23% $499 $359 100% 71 'romp occupancy Fee $180 121% $148 $32 101% $150 - 72 News rack impound fee Fee $100 36% $274 $174 100% $275 $175 73 Development agreement Deposit $20,000 231% $8,641 -$11,359 100% $8,640 -$11,360 74 Williamson Act contract removal Deposit $1,000 25% $4,041 $3,041 100% $4:040 $3,040 75 Socio Economic Study Fee $100„000 108% $92,317 -$7,683 100% $92,400 47,600 IW3112006 Public Resource Management Group Page 7 of 8 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET -TOTAL PROGRAM INFORMATION City of Redlands Planning 2006(2007 Recommendations Service Name Service Revenue @ %of Full Cast 'Revenue 100% Current Subsidy cost RecoveryRevertua @ Policy Increased T e Current Fee Full Cast Potlg Level Level Revenue 77 tong Range Planning Non fee $0 0% $97,751 $97,751 0% $0 $0 80 Support to Building Support $0 0% $18,344 $18,344 0% $0 0 84 All other ackrely pion fee $0 0.00% $263,024 $263.024L0% $0 $0 Toual unser Fees $865.930 $1,107,496 $241,566 $1,094,856 $228,925 96 of f uli Gast 78%: 100% 22% 99% 26% ToW Other Services $0 $379,119 $379,119 $0, $0 %of Full Cost 0% 100% 100% 0% 0% _ Department Totals $865,930 $1,486,616 $620,686 $1,034;$56 $228,926 ct %of Full Cost 58% 100%: 42% 74% 26° r,> 1013V2006 Public Resource Management Group Page 8 of ENGINEERING SUMMARY RESULTS PER UNIT AND ANNUAL. SUMMARIES 20 of 52 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET -PER UNIT INFORMATION City of Redlands Public Works-Engr Admire 200612007 Recommendations Service Mame Service Annual 100%of Full Current Cost Recovery Fee r Policy Subsidy s Policy T Volume C Trent Fee " of Full Cost Cost Subsidy Policy Levet:% Level Levet 1 Environmental impact Review Fee 57 $145 77% $188 $43 1001yo $188 $0 2 Environmental impact report Review Fee 6 $0 0% $552 $552 100% $552 $0 3 Tentative Tract Map Fee 13 $565 1GO% $567 $2 100% 7 $0 4 Revised Tract Map Fee 1 $0 0% $284 $284 100% $2$4 $0 5 Final Tract Map Fee 16 $0 0% $495 $495 100% $495 $0 6 Tentative Parcel Map Fee 9 91 $550 $50 100% $550 $(} 7 Revised Parcel Map Fee 1 $0 0% $2$4 $284 100% $284 $0 8 Final Parcel Map Fee 7 $0 01/. $452 $452 140 $452 Conditional Use Ptamit Fee 30 $570 94% $609 $39 100% $0 n 10 Commission Review and Approval Fee 25 $510 86% $592 $82 100% $592 $t) 5h; 1 t Building Moving Permit Fee 1 $390 80% $96 100% $486 $0 12 Lot Line Adjustment Fee 19 $0 0% $260 $260 104°far $260 $0 13 Certificate of Compliance Fee 20 $0 0% $160 $160 100% $160 $0 14 Street Vacation Fee 1 $0 0% $546 100% $546 $0, 15 Subordination AgreerrtontlLi n Release Fee 5 $100 25% $393 $293 1001Y. $393 $0 16 Building Permit-Residential Fee 270 $4 01/0 $326 $320 100% $320 $0, 17 building Permit-Ct1mmercialtindustrial Fee 12 $0 0% $320 $320 1000/. $320 6 18 Building Permit-Room Addition Fee 157 $4 0% $111 $111 100% $111 19 Plan Check r Precise Grading-SFR Fee 19 $170 13% $1,355 $1,1$5 100% $1:355 $0 20 Plan Check-Precise Grading-Subdivision Base Fee Fee 21 $174 10% $1,622 $1,452 1DO% $1,622 $0 21 Pian Check-Preclse Grading-.Subdivision Lot fee Fee 528 $0 0% $71 $71 100% $71 $0 2 Plan Check-Precise Grading-Subdivision Acre Fee Fee 300 $0 0% $86 $86 100% $0 23 Plan Check-SVVPPP-SFR Fee 19 0 0% $1,135 $1,135 100% $1.135 $0 24 Plan ;heck-SWPPP-Project Base l=ee Fee 21 $0 0% $1,137 $1,137 100% $1»137 $0 25 4'Ran L heck-SPPP^ uDclvis"con Lot Fee Fee 628 $0 1013112 Public Resource Management Group Page 1 of USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET PER UNIT INFORMATION- Pity}of Redlands Public Works-Engr Admits 2006/2007 Recommendafions Ser0ce Name Service Annual Current Fee11 100%of Full Current cost Recovery Fee Policy Subsidy Policy %of Foil Cost T Volume Cash Subssi Polls Level % level Level: 26 Plan Check-SWI PP-Subdivision Acre Few Fee 300 $0 0% $127 $127 100% $127 $t}': 27 WOMP CAMP lnspi boat.Complex Projects Fee i5 $11000 152% $658 $342 100% $658 $0 28 Wt3MP EMP lrtspectron-Standard Projects Fee 5 5600 137% $439 -$161 100% $439 29 WOMP BMP Inspection.Basic Projects Fee 20 $300 76% '$395 $95 100% $395 $0 0 Plan Check-Final WC$MP-SFR Fee 36 0 0% $977 $977 100% $;977 $0 31 Plan Check-Final WQMP-Project Base Fee Fee 72 $0 0% $737 $737 100% $7.37 $0, 32 Plan Check-Final WOMP-Subdivislon Lot Fee Fee 528 $0 0% $248 5248 10011. $248 0' 31 Plan Check-Final WOMP-Subdivision Acre Fee Fee 300 $0 0% $130 $130 100% $130 $0 34 Plan Check-Parcel Map-Base Fee Fee 12 SLOW 72% $1,481 $421 100% $1,481 $0 35 Plan Check-Parcel jalap-Lot Fee Fee 15 $25 -31% $81 $56 100% $81 $0 36 Phan Check-Parcel Map-Acre Fee Fee 100 $0 0% $81 $81 100% $81 $t? 37 P€m Check-Tract Map.Sass.Fee Fee 9 $1,060 77% $1,368 $308 100% $1';368' St} 38 Plast Check-Tract Map-Lot Fee Fee 513 $25 31% $81 $56 100% $81 $0 39 Pians Check-T€ask Map-Acre Fee Fee 200 $0 0% 1 $81 100% $$1 $Q 40 Plan Check-Street Construction Fee 182 $0 0`l. $267 $267 100% $267 $0 41 Plan Check-Storm Drains Fee 25 $0 0% $247 $247 100% $247 $0 42 Platt Check-Street Lights Fee 40 $0 0% $158 $158 100% $158 so 43 Plan C -Tratric Signals-New Mstallation's Fee 10 $0 0% $,855 9 100% $859 :$0 44 Plan Check-Traffic Signals ificattons Fee 6 $0 0% $859 $855 10016 $859 $0, 45 Plan Check-Street Trees Fee 40 $d 0% $263 $263 1000/6 $263 $0'', 46 Plan Check-Signs and Stuping Fee 20 $0 0% 5253 100% $253 $0 44'T Encroachment Permit-Driveway Approach Few 380 $90 189% $48 -$42 100% $48 $0' 48 Encroachment ent Permit-Sidewalk Fee 357400 $0.26 2911 $0.09 -$0.17 100°/0 $0,09 $0 49 Encroachment Permit.Cross Gutter/Spandrel Fee 14300 $0,30 54% $0.56 $0,26 100% $0,56 0 50 Encroa hroem Permit-Curer and Clutter Fee 5400 $0.40 19% $2.12 $1.72 10010 $2.12 ICY31/20M Public Resource Management Group Page 2 of 8 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET PER UNIT INFORMATION City of Redlands Public Works-Engr Admin 2006/2007 Recommendations Service Marne service Annual Current Fee %of Full Cost 100%of Full Current Cost Recovery Fee @ Policy Subsidy @ Policy Type Volume Gest Subsidy Policy Level % Level Level 51 Encroachment Permit•Curb I Berm Fee 1 r 30 $0.40 16%' $2.53 $2.13 100% $2.53 $0 52 Encroachment Permit-Crushed Aggregate Base Fee 1035600 $0.08 184% $0.04 -$0.04 100% $0.04 53 Encroachment Permit-Asphalt Pavement Fee 1061300 $0.08 184% $0.44 .$0.04 1 $0.04 $0 54 Encroachment Permit-Street Light Fee 110 $150 192% $78 -$72 104% $78 $0 55 Encroachment Permit-Traffic Signa$-Now Fee 3 $1,000 48% $2,084 $1,084 100% $2.084 $0 56 Encroachment Permit-Traffic Signal-Modification Fee 4 $4 0% $1,682 $1,682 100% $1:682 $0 57 Encroachment Permit•Reinforced Concrete Fee 110 $48 55% $86 $38 100% $0' 58 Encroachment Permit-Storm Brain Pipe Fee 4800 $2 27% $9 $6 100% $8 $0' 54 Encroachment Permit-Curb InleuOuttet Structures Fee 54 $120 184% $6 -$55 100% $65 $0' 60 Encroachment Permit-Storm Drain Manhole/Junction Box Fee 10 $150 230% $65 -$85 1MT. $65 0' a 61 Encroachment Permit-Curb tore Fee 10 $60 101% $60 $0 100% $60 $0' no"s 62 Encroachment Permit-Sewer Main Fee 20300 $0.80 $79''0 $0.92 $0.12 100% $0.92 {i'' 63 Encroachment Permit-Sewer Manhole Fee 115 $150 230% $66 $85 100% $65 $0 64 Encroachment Permit-Sewer Cleanout: Fee 6 $100 77% $130 $30 1001. $130 sa 65 Encroachment Permit-Sewer Lateral Fee 350 $150 230% $65 $85 100% $65 $0' 65 Encroachment Permit-Water Main-Potable Fee 3380011" $0.84 75% 1 D6 $0.26 100% $1.06 $0, 67 Encroachment Permit-Water Main•Iron-potable Fee 1 $0.80 75% 1.05 $0.26 100% $1.06 $0 68 Encroachment Permit-Water Service Lateral Fee 620 $150 592% $25 -$126 100% 25 $0 69 Encroachment Permit-Fire Hydrant Assembly Fee 75 $50 77% $65 $15 100% $55 $0 70 Encroachment PernvE-Water Shutdown Fee 20 $400 614% $65 100% $65 $0. 71 Encroachment Permit-Fire Service Fee 16 $150 270% $56 494 100 72 Encroachment Permit-Excavation,Trench,Street Cut Fee 36100 $0.26 22% $1.21 $0.96 100% $1,21 $0 73 Encroachment Permit-street Patch Fee 41800 $0.26 40% $0.65 $0.39 100% Wes $0 74 Encroachment Pomift-Processing Fee Fee 306 $15 7% $212 $197 100% $2.12 $0 75 Grading Permit-SFR Fee I 13 $0 0% $368 $368 100% $0 1W3V2006 Public Resource Management Group Page 3 of 8 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET PER UNIT INFORMAi"ION- City of Redlands Public Works-Entgr Admin 200612007 Recommendations Service Mame Service Annual Current Fee %of Full Cost 100%of Full Current Cost RecoveryFee Policy Subsidy @ Policy T volume Cost SubsidX, Polir Level % Lever Level 76 Grading Permit-Subdivision Base Fee Fee 21 $0 0% $3039 $309 100+0 $3039 $0 77 Grading Permit-Subdivision Lot Fee Fee 300 $0 0% $44 $44 100% $44 $0 723 Grading Permit-Subdivision Acre Fee Fee 500 $0 0% $69 $69 100% $69 $0 a) 79 Street Tree Permit-Street Tree Removal Fee 20 $10 30!0 $ $279 3% $10 $279' a) 80 Street Tree Permit•Boom Tree Trimming Fee 30 $5 3% $161 $156 3% $5 $156 a) 81 Street Tree Permit-Street"tree Planting Fee 50 $25 11% $228 $203 11% $25 $203 a) 82 Street Tree Permit,-Street Tyree Relocation Fee 5 $25 11% $228 $203 11% $25 $203 a) 83 Street Tree Permit-Processing Fern Fee 50 $5 7% $73 $68 79'a $5 84 Permit-Truck Route Fee 104 $55 85% $65 $10 100% $65 $0 6) 85 Permit Wide Load Fee 369 $16 2756 $60 $44 27% $16 $44 86 Permit-Outdorn dining-New Fee 1 $2505 139% $1813 470 100" $180 $0 87 Permit-0)utdoor Dining-Annual Renewal Fee 5 $150 171% -$62 100% $88 $05 88 Permit Outdoor 0lisplay-New Fee 1 $250 139% $180 -$70 100% $1803 $0 9 Permit.Outdoor Dismay•Annual Renewal Fee 1 $150 171% $88 -$62 100% $0 e} 90 Park Reservation-Prospect Park Sign Fee 18 $30 251!0 $118 $88 30% $35 $83 c) 91 Park Reservation-Redlands Bowl Fee 21 $25 155'0 $170 $145 18% $30 $140 c) 132 Park Reservation=Sewell Theatre Fee 1 $25 15% $170 $145 18% $303 $140 c) 93 Park Reservation Sylvan Park Fee 88 $25 15% $170 $145 19% $30 $140 r^) 94 Park reservation Other Parks Fee 5 $gra 15% $170 $145 18`x+ $3(} $140 95 Street Naive Sign Installation Fee 30 $300 99% $302 $2 100% $302 $0, 96 Stop SQA Installation Fee 10 $200 39% $518 $318 1OO°l0 $51$ $(5 97 NP03ES'Business Ins'peerlon Low Risk Fee 603 $276 40323'a $69 -$207 100% $69 $0 98 NPdJES Business inspection-High Frisk Fee 180 $344 5O1% $69 $275 100% $6$"01 S9 $0 99 NP05ES-03usiness lnspection,Medium Risk Fee 120 $276 4O2% $69 -$207 100% $69 $0 100 All other activity Non Fee 1 $0 0% $1,137,299 $1,137,;299 090 $0 $1,137,299 a) lla residem is voluntanlypianting,trrir enng relocating tar removing a tree,no fee w1fibia charged.; of , la.set by state rrtandate, c) These services-typtcally subsidized by the general hand,similar to F erwreatlan services: 10131/2006 Public Resource Management roup Page 4 of 8 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET -TOTAL,PROGRAM INFORMATION City of Redlands Public Warks-Engr Admin 2006/2007 Recommendations Revenue @ Revenue @ 100% Cost Recovery Revenue @ Policy Increased Service Name Service Type of Full Cost Current Subsidy Current Fee Full Cost Policy Levet % Level Revenue 1 Environmentat,Impact Review Fee $8,268 77% $10;742 $2,477 100% $10,742 $2,477 2 Environmentat Impact Repon Review Fee $0 0% $3;314 $3,314 100% $3,314 $3,314 3 Tentative Tract Map Fee $7,348 100% $7;368 $20 100% $7,365 $20' 4 Revised Tract Map Fee $0 0% $284 $284 100% $284 $284 5 Final Tract Map Fee $0 0% $4;946 $4,946 100% $4,346 $4.946 6 Tentative Parcel Map Fee $4,500 91% $4,947 $447 100% $4,947 $447 7 Revised Parcel Map Fee $0 O0/0 $284 $284 100% $284 $284'; 8 Final Parcel Map Fee $0 0% $3,167 $3,167 100% $3,167 $3,167 9 Conditional Use Permit Fee $17,100 94% $18,281 $1,181 100% $18,281 $1,181 10 Commission Review and Approval Fee $12,750 86% $14;812 $2,1362 100% $14,812 $2,062 an 11 5449ding Moving Permit Fee $3930 80% $486 $96 100% $486 $96 12 tot Line Adjustment Fee $0 0% $4;939 $4,939 50045 $4,939 $4,539 13 Certificate of Compliance Fee $0 0% $3;207 $3,207 100% $3,207 $3,207 14 Street Vacation Fee $b 09`0 $546 $546 100% $546 $546 15 Subordination AgreernentfLien Release Fee $600 25% $1,,963 $1,463 1 $1,963 $1,463 16 Budding Permit-Residenteal Fee $0 0% $86:385 $86,355 10010 $86,355 $86,355 17 Budding Permit-Commorcial/Industrisl Fee $0 0% $3;838 $3.838 100% $3,838 $3,838 18 Building Pormlt-Room Addition Fee $0 0% $17,451 $17,451 100% $17,451 $17.451 19 Plan Check-Precise Grading-SFR Feet $3,230 13% $25,748 $22,618 100% $25,748 $22.518 20 Plan Cheek-Precise Grading-Subdivision Base Fe Fee $3,570 10% $34,062 $30,492 100% $34,062 $30,492 21 Plan Check-Precise Grading-Subdivision Lot tee Fee $0 0 $37399 $37,399 100% .. $37,399 $37,399 22 Plan Check-Precise Grading-Subdivision Acre Fe Fee $0 0% $25,661 $25,661 100% $25,661 $25,661 23 Plan Check-S PPP-$FR Fee $0 0% $21,561 $21,561 100% $21,561 $21,561, 24 Plan Check-SWPPP-Project Base Fee Fee $0 0% $23;877 $23,877 100% $23,877 $23,877 5 Plan Check-SWPPP-Subdivision Lot Fee Fee $0 0% $46,2131 $46,213 100% 546,213 $46 213.. 10131/2006 Public Resource Management Group Page 5 of 8 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET -TOTAL PROGRAM INFORMATION- City of Redlands Public Works-Engr Admin 200612007 Recommendations Revenue Revenue 100% Gast Recovery Revenue Poky increased Service Manse Service Type %of Ful!Cost Revenue Subsidy Current Fee Full Cost Policy Level Level Revenue 26 Plan Check-S TPPP-Subdivision Acre Fee Fee $0 0% $38,060 $38,060 100% $38,060 $38,060 27 vUt tv1P HMP Inspection-Complex Propels Fee $15,000 152% $9;868 •$5,132 100% $9,868 -$5„132 28 WQ1MP HMP inspection-Standard,Projects Fee $3,000 137% $2,197 -$803 100% $2,197 -$303 29 WQMPBMPInspection-BasicProjects Fee $6,000 76% $7;900 $1,9{}0 100% $7,9W $1,900': 30 Pram Check-Final WQM€'•SPR Fee $0 0% $35,182 $35,182 100% $35,1lb! $35,182 31 Plast Check-Final WOMP-Protect Base Fee Fee $0 0% $53,041 $53,041 €0096 $53,041 $53,041 3: Plow Check-Final WOMP-Subdivision Lot Fee Fee $0 0% $130.758 $130,758 100% $130,758 $130.758 33 Pura Cheek-Final WOMP-Subdivision Acre Fee Fee $0 0% $38:967 $38,967 100°!0 $38,967' $38,967 34 Plan Check-Parcer Map-Base Fee Fee $12,720 72 $17,777 $5,053 10096 $17,777 $5,057 a 35 Plan Check-i'arcor Map-Lot Fee fee $375 31°6 $1.213 $838 100% $1.213 $838 36 Plan Check-Parcel Map-Acre Fee I I Fee $0 0% $8,085 $8,085 1001+b $8,085: $8«085 37 Plan Check-Tract Map-Base Fee Fee $9,540 77070 $12313 $2,773 100% $12.313 $2,773 38 Pion Check-"frac(Map-Lot Fee Fee $12,825 31% $41,475 $28,650 100 $41,475 $28.650 39 Plan Check-Tract Map-Acre Fee Fee $0 0% $16,170 $16,170 10036 $46,170 $16,170 40 Plan Check-Street Construction I Fee $0 0% $4.$,550 $48,550 100% $48,550 $48,550 41 Plan Check-Storm C3rains Fee $0 090 $6,180 $6,180 100% ,. _ $6180' 36.180. 42 Plan Chuck-Street Lights Fee $0 0% $6,3019 $6,309 100% $6,309 $6.309 43 Plan Check-Traflic Signals-New Installations Fee $0 0% $8,590 $8,590 100% $8.590 $8,590 44 Plan Check-Traffic Signals-Modifications Fee $0 0% $5,154 $5,154 100% $5.154 $5,154 45 Plan Check-SR Trees Fee 0 0% $10;.518 $10,518 100010 $10,518 $10,518 46 Plan Check-Signs and Striping Fee $0 0% $5,069 $5,069 10096 $5«069 $5.069 47 Encroachment Permit-Driveway Appiciach Fee $34,200 189% $18;076 _$16,124 100% $18.076 $16,124 48 CrcroachrnentPermit-Sidewalk Fee $92,924 291% $31,957 $60,J67 100% 1$31,957 _$60,967 49 Encroachment Permit-Cross Cautter/Sp irdret Fee $4,290 54% $7,937100% 7.937 $3„647 50 Encroachment Permit•Curb end Guiter Fee $2 160 199& $11465 $9 305 100% 1 465' $9 ,305 10133112006 Public Resource Management:Group Paste 6 of 8 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET "TOTAL.PROGRAM INFORMATION- City of Redlands Public Works-Engr Admin 200&12047 Rocommendations Service Name Servile Type Revenue @ %of Full Cost Current Subsidy Revenue @ 100% Cost Recovery Revenue @ Policy Increased Current Fee Full Cost Policy Levet % Level Revenue 51 Encroachment:Permit-Curb 9 Berm Fee $400 16% $2,533 $2,133 100% $2,533 $2,133' 52 Encroachment'.Permit-Crushed Aggregate Rase. Fee $82,848 184te;6 $45,009 $37,839 100% $45,005 $37,839' 53 Encroachment Permit-Asphalt Pavement Fee $84,904 184% $46,125 -$38,779 100% $46125 -$38,779 54 Encroachment Permit-Streetlight Fee $16,500 192% $8.593 -$7,907 100% $8.593 -$7,507 S5 Encroachment Permit-Traffic Signat-Now Fee $3.000 48% $6„252 $3,252 100% $6,252 $3,252 56 Encroachment Permit-Traffic Signal-Modification Fee $0 0% $6,727 $6,727 100% $6,727 $6,727 57 Encroachment Permit-Reinforced Concrete Fee $5,280 56% $9,424 $4,144 100% $9,424 $4,144 58 Ericroachment Permit-'Storm Drain tripe Fee $9,600 27% $36,116 $26,516 100% $36.116 $26,516 59 Encroachment Permit-Curti Inletfduttet Structures Fee $6,480 184% $3,52.0 -$2,960 100% $3,520 -$2,550 rQ 60 Encroachment Permit-Storm Drain Manhoi 1Juncti Fee $1,500 230% $652 -$848 100% $652 -$80 f 61 Encroachment Permit-Curb Care Fee $600 101% $596 -$4 100% $536 $4, rLn 62 Encroachment Permit-Sewer Main Fee $16.240 87% $18,601 $2;361 100% $18,601 $2361 63 Encroachment Permit-Sewer Manhole Fee $17.250 230% $7,497 -$9,753 100`36 $7,497 -$9,753 64 Encroachment Parma-Sewer Cleanout Fee $600 77% $782 $182 1t?0% $782 $182 65 Encroachment Permit-Sewer Lateral Fee $52,500 230% $22,817 $23,6$3 100%la - $22,817 $29.683', 66 Encroachment Persist-Water Main Potable Fee $27.040 75% $35,883 $8,843 100% $35,583 $6,843 67 Encroachment Permit-Water Maui-[Von-potable Fee $8,000 75% $10.616 $2,616 1 $10,615 $2,015 68 Encroachment Permit-Water Service Lateral Fee $93.000 552% $15,704 -$77,296 100% $iSo704 -$77,296 65 Encroachment Permit-Fire Hydrant Assembly Fee $3,750 _ 77% $4,889 $1,139 100% $4,889 $1,139 70 Encroachment Permit•Water Shutdown Fee $8,000 614% $1,304 $6,696 100% $1,304 $6,696 71 EncrzoachmentPermit-Fire Service Fee $2,400 270% $888 -$1,$12 100% $ -$1,592 72 Encroachment Permit-Excavation,Trench,Street C Fee $9,386 22% $43,571 $34,185 100% $43.571 $34,185 73 Encroachment Permit b Street Patch Fee $10,868 40% $27;250 $16,382 100% $27,250 $16,382: 74 Encroachment Permit-Processing Fee Fee $4,590 7% $64,755 $60.165 100% $64.755, $60,165 75 gradin Permit-SFR Fee $0 0% $7,001 $7,001 100% $7,006 $7,001 1013112006 Public Resource Management:Group Page 7 of 8 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET -TO"T"AL.PROGRAM INFORMATION City of Redlands Public Work -Engr Admin 2006/2007 Recommendations Service deme Service Type Revenue QD %09 Full Coast Revenue Current Subsidy 100% Cast Recovery Revenue @ Policy increased Current Fee Full Cost PpliG Level Level Revenue 76 Grading Permit-Subdivision Rase Fee Fee $4 0% $5;487 1 1 $6,487 104% $5,487 $6,487' 77 Grading permit-Subdivision Lot Fee Fee $0 0% $13,303 $13,$03 100% $13,303 $13,303 78 Grading Permit-Subdivision Stere Fee Fee $4 0% $34;450 $34„450 140% $34,460 $34,460 79 Street Tree Permit-Street`free Removal Fee $200 3% $5;778 $5,578 3% $200 $0' 84 Street Tree Perm(-Street Tree Trimming Fee $150 30A $4;830 $4,680 3% $160 $0 81 Street Tree Permit-Street Trace Planting Fee $1,2 11% $11,404 $10,154 11% $1,2w $0'. 82 Street Tree PermH-Street Tree Retacabon Fee $125 11% $1;140 $1,015 11 $125 $0 83 Street Tree P ermll-Processing Fee Fee $250 7% $3,551 $3,401 7% $,.254 $4' 84 Permit-Truck Route Fee $5,720 85% $6,755 $1,036 100°70 $6,750 $1,035 85 Permit-Wide Load Fee $5,904 27% $22,038 $15,134 27% 85 Permit-Outdoor DiningNew Fee $5 904 $4 - $25(5 139% $184 -$70 #40" $180.,. -$74 ria 87 Permit-Outdoor Gaining-Arin"I Renewal Fee $750 171% $438 $312 1008 $43 $312 88 Permit-Outdoor Display-New Fee $250 139% $180 -$70 100% $180 $70 89 Permit-Outdoor Display-Annual Renewal Fee $150 171% $88 -$62 100% $88 -$62 90 Park Reservation-Prospect Park Sign Fee $540 25% $2,,127 $1.587 30% $530 $94 91 Park Reservation-Redlands Bowl Fee $525 15% $3,574 $3,049 111 $630 $105 92 Park Reservation-Sewoff Theatre Fee $25 15% $170 $145 18% $30 $5 93 Park Reservatroo,Sylvan Paris Fee $2,200 15°x0 $14;978 $12,778 18% $2,640 $440 94 Park Reservation-Other Parks Fee $1,575 15% $10,723 $9,148 18% $1,890 $315 95 Street Name Sign installation Fee $.9,400 99% $9,458 $58 100% $9„058 $58 95 Strap sign installation Fee $2,044 39% $5,179 $3,179 100% $5,179 $3,179 97 NPl7ES Business inspection-Low'Risk Fee $15,550 442% $4;118 -$12,442 100% $4,118 -$12,442 98 NIPUES Business Inspection-High Risk Fee $51,920 541% $12;354 -$49,555 100% $12,354 .$49,556 99 NPDES Business tnspectkni-Medium Risk Fee $33,124 402% $8,235 -$24,884 100%1 58,235 •$24.884 100 AltasiFreraetiv+ty Nun Foe $0 094 $1,137.299 $1,137,299 0396 $0 $0 Total User Fees(totalrevenualistr nniectsthebudgeted amount ,200 $1,582„.613 $598,413 $1,515.898- $631.698 %of Full Cost 56% 100% 44% 96% 71% Total Other Services $0 $1,13749 $1137,249 $0 $0 %of Full Cost 0% 100% 100% 0% 0 Department Totals $884,200 $2,719,913 $1,835,713 $1,515,898' $631,598 1493112005 %cat F"utl Cost PiNk Resource Management Group 100% 67' 56% Pi7dA of 8 POLICE SUMMARY RESULTS PER UNIT AND ANNUAL SUMMARIES 29 of 52 SER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET -PER UNIT IN OR1 t4T'IC7N- City of Redlands Police 2006/2007 Recommendatims Sovwwr Name Swvioa Annual. Current fee %of Full Cost 100%ofFuH Current CostRecnuery ', Fee @ Pa7kcy subsidy @ policy l Volume: cost SubsigX Pre#sc..:Levi � Level t-euea i) 1 Adult Emuninamet permit Fee 70 $64- 92% $fig $5 101% $70 -$1 b 2 Almon glare card-now Fee 100 $24 100% $24 $0 100%, $24 $0 h), 3 Aknort..e)ale card,eerrcrwal Fee 350 .....$15 fit% $24 $9 62% $15 $9 4 rt€scztw"nrc+spmse Fee 4340 $100 85% $117 $17 107% $125 -$3 t) 5 BicycleJ",rc Fee 37 $2 19% $11 $9 19% $2 $9 cl'.. 6 COWporriret Fere 4 .$100 15% $658. $658 15% -:. $100 S558 d) 7 CCW Far,Mit renewal Fee 4 $75 17% $446 $371 17% $75 $371 u) 6 Fing7ergwlnt•rothrrgg Fee 614 $8 88% $9 $1 88% . $8 $1 9 Mass xrda the From permit Fee 56 $64 66% $97 $33 104% .$100 10 Mochauni(capyottape) Fee 260 $15 _. 79% $19 .$4 105% ..$20 $7. 6tf.... 12 Mi"Itrteous-peenrn4s Fee l2 .;$185 ... 5496 $289 $704 64% $185 $104 1:3 Mlsoo4anon"s-pholes Fera 38 $30 99"% $30.. 80 99%... ....$30 $0 t) 14 Ropirisesson Fee 1095 $15 72,% $21 $6 ,. .72% _..515 $6 . 1a valucre wripound-:41 olio rs Fee 1058 $75 76% $99 S24 14196 5100 -$1 _. .. ,.: 16 vehicur wilpound-Dul Fee 763 $154 85% $176... $26 140% .$175 $T 17 Vkor Clearance Fee 39 $21 97% $22:. $1 97% $21 $1. 18 Coat adopurin Fee 388 $5 13% $44 $35 13% $5 $35 19 Dogabrtlation Fee 466 Sill 24% :.. $41'.� $31 24% .... 10 $31: 20 Animalbcsardwq Fos 39'7 $5 26% $19 $14 26% $5 $14 2 7 Cat release-owner Fite 363 $to 56'% SIB $8 56% .... S 10 $8. 22 Do4l releate-owner Fee 291 $20 67% $30' S10 67% $20 $10 23 Snorter:Owen Fee 521 S2o 83'% $24 $4 83% $20 ., S4 28 TzaprentWi Fee 195 $5 36% 14 $9 107% $15 -$1 6 rima sempe s animal control. Non fee 1 $0 0% $a94,463 $584.463 0 $0 $584,463. 30 Aft allae3r,artwity-public sattey Mara tee 1 $0 .. 0% $22,367.749 $22.367,749 _ 0%..::. ..... $0 $22.367.74 34 Scgapast at l3niklaslgl:.,-in^sprtcteonss X Suppers, 60 $0 0% $413, $413 0% P. $.413:. ra) 'rho W listed(S 12)mprresarrts Yv amount seetby Atedurads Tho tint fee amount is.$64,with MO OlftAWCO 9011V to DOJ and the county;. h) rho revivaae qer mwedman this aravrtyta nonmed linin the ot4itles.: 0 Me me trsted($1001 smb;the nttiuht kept AY Re fibra is Me t i#fee an round is OW,web Me dtlferenoo going to DOJ,Feu is set by.stato la ul the toe lrstad($✓5)AWMSOP14 dtw amount kept byRedlands,The Adl W aura m4 is$77 w o#*dn+teomw going to the county Fere is set by state law; e) The Ave kwort($*i mpresents the amount kept by Redlands 7"he fctlt fBB antouraP s$7d,wik'fa the dfffarenea gadfap to the cmuna3i:... fl Mix lane O's,sat by the.state 9) MAS too istlzWOW the preocessrnyand approvralafthobarred.Any sturrdbytime wrHhochsrrgedporho 111412006Public Resource Management Group Sage 1 of 3 USER FEE STUD' SUMMARY SHEET TOTAL PROGRAM INFORMATION- City of Redlands Police 200£12007 Recommendations Service!dame Service Revenue @ %of Full Cost Revenge @ 100% Current Subsidy Cost Recovery Revenue @ Policy Increased __izpa Current Fee Full Cost Policy Level % Levet Revenue 1 Adult Entertainer permit Fee $4.480 92% $4,844 $364 1019 _. $4,900 $420 2 Airport gate card-new Fee $2,400 100% $2,406 $6 100% $2,400 $0 3 Airport gate card-renewal Fee $5,250 62% $8„420 $3,170 62% $5.254 $0 4 False alarm response Fee $434,000 85% $508,119 $74,119 107% $542,500 $108,500 5 Bicycle license Fee $74 19% $392 $318 19 74 $0 6 CCW permit Fee $400 15% $2,632 $2,232 15% $400 $0 7 CCW permit renewal Fee $300 17% $1.785 $1,485 17% $300 $0 8 Fingerprint-walling Fee $4,912 88% $5,565 $653 88% $4,912 $0 c 9 Massage therapist peanit Fee $3,200 66% $4,826 $1,626 104% $5,000 $1,800 10 Media unit(copy of tape) Fee $3,000 79% $3,810 $810 105% $4,000 $1.000 12 Miscellaneous-permits Fee $2,220 64% $3,466 $1,246 64% $2,220 $0 13 Miscellaneous-photos Fee $1,140 99°l0 $1,154 99% $1,140 $0 14 Repossesion Fee $16,425 72°lQ $22,751 $6,326 72% $16,425 $0 15 'Vehicle impound-all ethers Fee $79,350 76% $104,877 $25,527 101% $105,800 $26,450 16 Vehicle impound-DUl Fee $27,450 85% $32.170 $4,720 100% $32,025 $4,575; 17 `Visa Clearance Fete $819 97% $840 $21 97% $819 $0 18 Cat adaption Fee $1,940 13% $15,510 $13,570 13% $1,940 $0 19 Dog adoption Fee $4,660 24% $19,167 $14,497 24% $4,660 $0 20 Animal boarding Fee. $1,985 26% $7,645 $5„660 26 $1,985 $0 21 Gat release-owner Fee ;$3,630 56% $6,443 $2,813 56% $3,630 $0' 22 Dog release.owner Fee $5,820 67% $8,635 $2,815 67% $5,820 $0 23 Shelter appreh. Fee $10,420 83% $12,502 $2,082 83% $10„420 $0 1114/2006 Public Resource Management Group Page 2 of USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY MEET -TOTAL PROGRAM INFORMATION City of Redlands Police 2006/ OCA? Recom emiation Service Flume Service Revenue @ %of Full Cost Revenue @ 100% Current Subsidy Cost.Recovery Revenue @ Policy Increased Type Current Fee Full Cost Poll t evel Level Revenue 28 Trap rentals Fee $975 36% $2,724 $1,749 107% $2,925 $1,950 29 Fieldservices-astamal control #+torr tee $d d3'° $584,463 $584,463 0% $0 $0 30 All Other activity-public saftey Non fee $0 0% $22,367,749 $22,367,749 0% $0 $0 31 Support to Building-Inspections Support $0 O.Qd°1° $24,772 $24,772 it°6 $d $p Total User Fees $614,850 .$780,670 $165,820 $759,545 $144,695 %of Full Cost 793' 100% 21% 97% 24% w 0 Total tither Services $p $22,976,984 $22„976,994 $d $0 %of Full Cost ', 0°Fu 100% 10010 0% 0% Department Totals $614,850 $23,757,654 $23,142,804 $759,545 $144,69 of Full Cost 3% 100% 97% 3% 24% 11/412006 Public Resource Management groupPage 3"of 3 FIRE SUMMARY RESULTS ANNUAL SUMMARY AND INDIVIDUAL FEE RECOMMENDATIONS 33 of 52 USER FEE STUDYSUMMARY SHEET -TOTAL PROGRAM INFORMATION Agency, City of Redlands Department Fire Fiscal Year: 20061/07 Recommendations Service flame Service Revenue @ %of Full Cast Revenue 100% Current Subsidy Cost Recovery% €tevenue Increased Type- Current Fee Full Cost Rmomm Level Revenue 1 Plan Review Fee $54,517 67% $81,587 $27,070 100% $81,587 $27,070 2 Plan Check. Fee $25,000 19% $135,039 $110,039 37% $50,000 $25,000 3 Fire Marshal Mandated inspections Fed; $5,600 21% $27,054 $21,454 41% $11,200 $5,600 4a False Alarm Responses-fee related Fee $15,000 84°l° $17,897 $2,897 84% $15,000 $0 4b False Alarm Responses-non tee Non Fee $0 0% $340,041 $340,041 0% $0 $0 5a Fire Reports-fee related Fee $500 4% $13,611 $13111 4% $500 $0 5b Fire reports-non fee Non Fee $0 0% $440,085 $440,085 0% $0 $0 6 Prevention Inspections Fee $32,850 11% $297,266 $264,416 14% $41,063 $8,213 7 Engine Company Inspections Fee $12,150 11% $109,840 $97,6911 t7% ` $18,225 $6,075' 8 Permits Fee $15,000 69°1° $21,893 $6,893 1004° $21,893 $6,893 __ ' 9 Weed Abatement Fee $50,000 35°!° $142,945 $92,945 63% $90,000 $40,000 10 Hydrant/Hydro Flaw Test Fee $0 0% $16,524 $16,524 0% $0 $0' 11 Admin fee-suppression cost recover) Fee $1,500 1% $111,940 $110,440 2 $2,000 $500 12 Prevention Investigation,In pections Non Fee $240 0% $96,788 $96,548 0°!a $240 $0' 13 Special Event Standby Fee $10,000 19%' $51,960 $41,960 19% $10,000 $0. 14 All Other activity Non Fee $121,000 1°!° $11,410,783 $11„289,783 1% $121,000 $0 Total User F $+222,117 $1,027,556 $805,439 $341,467 $119,350 %of Full Cost 22% 100% 78% 33% 54% Total Other Services $121,240 $12,287,697 $12,166,457 $121,240 $0 %of Full Cast 1% 100% 99% 1% 0% Department Totals $343,357 $13,315,253 $12,971,896 $462,707 $119,350 %of Full Cost 2.6% 100% 97% 154' 35°! 141311'.2006 Public Resource Management Croup Wage 1 of 1 Agency: City of Redlands [department: Fire Fiscal Year 2€106/2007 SERVICE ©EFINFION Service# Service Name Current Fee Recovery Recommend Change Type of Percentage Fee Service 1 False alarm-residential $ 0 $90 - $0 Fee False alarm-commerciai $150 $150 $0 Fee Incident&special report $40 $40 $0 Fee 4 Investigative rprt-structure,comm. $100 $100 $0 Fee Investigative rprt-structure,SFD $80 $$0 $0 Fee 6 Investigative rprt-vehicle $45 45 $0 Fee 7 Plan review-commercial $130 $200 $70 Fee 8 Plan review-Multi family $40 $60 $20 Fee 9 Plan review-other(access,grading,house moving) $50 $75 $25 Fee 10 Flan review-residential tract $50 $75 $25 Fee 11 Plan review-single family $25 $37 $12 Fee 1� 12 Plan cheek-consultations(hourly Fee) $,100 $200 $100 Fee 13 Plan check-fire alarm $200 $200 $0 Fee 14 Plan check-sprinklers $200 $200 $0 Fee 15 Flan check-prevention engineering $150 $200 $50 Fee 16 Plan check-fuel dispensing $50 $200 $150 Fee 17 Plan check-hood&duct $50 $200 $150 Fee 18 flan check-medical gas $50 $200 $150 Fee 19 Plan check-portables $50 $200 $150 Fee 20 flan check-spray booths $50 $200 $150 Fee 21 Insp-care Facilities l churches $40 $100 $60 F ee 22 Insp-pre school l school/day care $40 $100 $60 Fee 23 Insp-high ruse $200 $400 $200 Fee 24 Insp-daycare 1 foster care(6 or less) 0 $0 $0 Fee 35 of 52 Agency: City of Redland Department: Fire Fiscal Year- 006/2007 SERVICE DEFINITION Selvice## Service Name Current Fee Recovery Recommend Change Type of Percentage Fee Service- Mve 25 Msp-aprtmnt/condo 1-10 units $50 $75 $25 Fee 26 Insp-aprtmnticondo 11-30 units $75 $100 $25 Fee 27 Insp-aprtmnt(condo 31- 0 units $100 $125 $25 Fee 28 Insp-aprtmnUcondo 57-75 units $130 $150 $20 Fee 29 Insp-aprtmnttcondo 76-100 units $150 $175 $25 Fee 30 Insp-aprtmntfcondo 101 +units $180 $225 $45 Fee 31 Insp-cert of occupancy ordinary Hazard $35 $40 $5 Fee 32 Insp-cert of occupancy high hazard $50 $100 $50 Fee 33 Insp-commerbal B-2 $25 $40 $15 Fee 34 Insp-commercial Xmas tree $50 $75 $25 Fee 35 Insp-commercial high hazard $75 $100 $25 Fee 6 Insp-motels 1-20 units $50 $75 $25 Fee 37 Insp-motels 21-40 units $80 $100 $20 Fee 38 Insp-motels 41-50 units $95 $125 $30 Fee 39 Insp-motels 51+units $130 $155 $25 Fee 40 Engine company Insp-ordinary hazard $35 $50 $15 Fee 41 Engine company iinsp-high hazard $50 $75 $25 Fee 42 Aircraft repair hangar permit $50 $72 $22 Fee 43 Aircraft refueling vehicle permit $25 $36 $11 Fee 44 Compressed gasrLPG permit $50 $72 $22 Fee 45 Covered mall permit $105 $152 $47 Fee 46 Dry cleaning permit $50 $72 $ 2 Fee 47 Dust producing permit $75 $109 $34 Fee 4$ Explosives permit $50 $72 $22 Fee 49 Fruit ripening permit $50 $72 $ 2 Fee 50 Flammabledcornbustible liquid permit $50 $72 $22 Fee 36 of 52 Agency: City of Redlands Department: Fire Fiscal Year: 2006/27 SERVICE DEFINITION Service# Service Name Current Fee Recovery Recommend Change Type of Percentage Fee Service 51 Hazardous 1 toxic J corrosive permit $50 $72 $22 Fee 52 High piled combustible permit, $50 $72 $22 Fee 53 Junk yard permit $50 $72 $22 Fee 54 Lumber yard permit $50 $72 22 Fee 55 Medical gas system permit $5 $72 $22 Fee 56 Pesticides permit $50 _ $72 $22 Fee 57 Pipeline excavation 1 operation permit $100. $145 $45 Fee 56 Poison gas permit $50 $72 $22 Fee 59 Radioactive material permit $50 $72 $22 Fee 60 Refrigeration equips permit $50 $72 $22 Fee 1 Repair garage permit $50 $72: $22 Fee 62 Spray booth permit $50 $72 $22 Fee 3 Tanks permit $50 $72 $22 Fee 64 Welding I cutting permit $50 7 $22 Fee 65 Bonfire permit $25 $36 $11 Fee 66 Carnival 1 fair permit $50 $72 $22 Fee 67 Fireworks permit $100 $145 $45 Fee 68 Open flame permit $25 $36 $11 Fee 59 Parade float permit $50 $72 22 Fee 70 Assembly 1000+persons w/stage $205 $297 $ 2 Fee 71 Assembly<1000 persons w/stage $165 $239 $74 Fee 72 Assembly 300+persons no stage $165 $239 $74 Fee 73 Assembly 50-2099 persons no stage $85 $123 $38 Fee _ 74 Tents 1 canopies $50 $72 $22 Fee 37 of 52 Agency: City of Redlands Department. Fire Fiscal Year: 2006/2007 SERVICE DEFINITION Service# Service Name> Current Fee Recovery Recommend Change Type Of Percentage. Fee Service 75 Weed abatement admin $197 $250 $53 Fee 76 Weed abatement disking(per acre $2$ $80 $52 Fee 77 Weed abatement'mowin -lot(per acre) $50 $100 $50 Fee 78 Weed abatement hand work- (per hour) $35 $75 $40 Fee 79 Hydrant/Hydro Flow Test Install,'1tank $80 $100 20 Fee 80 Hydrant/Hydro Flow Test;Install,2 tanks $100 $200 $100 Fee 81 Hydrant/Hydro Flow Test-Install,3 tanks $154 $300 $150 Fee 82 Hydrant/Hydro Flaw Test'.-Removal„ 1 tanks $80 $100 $20 Fee 83 Hydrant/Hydro Flow Test-Removal,2 tames $100 $200 $100 Fee, 84 Hydrant/Hydro Flow Test Removal,3 tanks $150 $300 $150 Fee 85 Admin fee-cost recovery $45 $60 $15 Fee 86 Flow Test Fire Flow $25 $40 $15 Fee 38 of 52 RECREATION SUMMARY RESULTS ANNUAL SUMMARY 39 of 52 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY Y SHEET -TOTAL PROGRAM INFORMATION- Agency: City of Redlands Department: Recreation Fiscal Year: 2006107 Recommendations Service Revenue @Revenue 100% Revenue @ Innes Service ams 'k of Full Cost Revenue Subsidy Cost Recovery% e Current Fee Full Gast Recomm Level Revenue 1 Contract Glasses Fee $76,580 3196 $251,372 $174,392 31% $76,980 $p 2 programs-Birthday Partys Feer $9,540 55% $18,084 $8.144 55% $9,940 $0 3 Teen Programs Fee $0 0% $73,038 $73,038 0% $0 $0 4 Special Events Non fee $p 0 $149,779 $109,779 0% $0 so 5 [Fleming Deposit Niru fes $0 0% $77,334 $77,334 0% $0 I 6 Day C:amplltirls World Fee $9,217 1095 $87,517 $38,704 10% $9217 $4'' 7 Saftbalt-Youth Fee $2,753 6% $48,048 $45,295 6% $2.753 $0 Softball-Adult Fee $49,509 31% $157,693 $108,184 36% $56,440 $6,931 9 Basketball-Youth Fee $5,336 13% $42,046 $36,710 13% $5.336 $4 10 Basketball-Adult Fee $5,7259% $66,397 $60,672 10% $6.469 $744 11 Football-Youth Fee $3,209 7% $46,323 $43,114 7% $3,209 $0 12 Scarcer-Youth Fee $0 0% $44,047 $44,047 0% $0 $4: 13 Soccer-Adult Fee $28,969' 27% $106,412 $77,443 32% $33,604 $4,635 14 °t.pall-Youth Fee $159,449' 2546 $42,322 $31,873 25% $10,445 $0' 15 Lill Hoopsters•Youth Fee $0 0% $42,046 $+12,046 „ 0% $0 $0 16 Voileybell-Adult Fee $3,470 12°% $28,340 $24,870 14% $4,025 $555 17 Tennis-Youth Fee $0 0% $42,046 $42,046 496 $p $0 18 Tennis Courts Fee $0 0% $27,835 $27,835 0% $0 $0 19 Racquetball Courts Fee $0 0% $11,278 $11,278 0% $0 $p 20 Community Ctr.Gynrnasium Fee $0 0% $19,381 $13.381 0% $0 $0 21 C=ommunity Gtr Game Rm Fee $2,599 9% $27,618 $25,019 9% $2,599 0 22 Senior Center Rentals(pl r} Fee $10,934 16°6 $67,520 $56,586 16% $10,934 $0 23 Cont.Or Rentals(pl r) Fee $5,185 4°{n $126,921 $121,736 4% $5.185 $0 24 Sr lours/Excursions Fee $24,476 41;5 $59,839 $35,363 41% $24.476 $0'' 25 Bait Field Rentals Grow Fee $4,526 8% $55,072, $50,546 8% $4 10131 Q006 Public Resource Management Group page 1 of 2 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SLEET TOTAL PROGRAM INFORMATION Agency; City of Redlands Department Recreation Fiscal Year: 2000107 Recommendations Service Revenue @ Revenue 100% Revenue tnoreased Service Name %of Full Cost Current Subsidy Cost Recovery% ape Current Fee Full Cost Recomm Level Revenue 27 SeniorTransportution Fee $5,696 5 $04,522 $194,826 5% $9,696 $0 28 seniorPrtm,3roms Fee $11,948 19% $64,077 $52,129 199E $11,948 $0 29 Senior Center Billiards Non fee $0 0% $5,619 $5,619 0% $0 0 30 ,Art Commission Non fee $0 0% $40,972 $40,972 0% $0 $0 31 Recreetron Commission Non tee $0 0% $90,026 $90,026 0% $0 $0 32 Senior Commission Nun fee $0 0% $88,820 $BB,920 0% 0 9 33 Orden Commission Non fee $f7 0% $69,592 $69,592 0% $0 $0 34 Northside Advisory Commission Non fee $0 o% $33.439 $35,439 0% $6 $0 Total User Fees $274,921 $1,760,19+4 $1,485,273 $287,787- $12,866 %of Full Cost 16% 100% 84% 46% 5% Total Other Services $o $515,581, $515,581 $,p $0 %of Full Cost 0% 100% 100% NJ 0% 0% Department Totals $274,921 $2,275.775 $2,000,854 $287,787 $12,866 %,of Full Cost 12% 100% 88% 13% 5% l(M31/2006 Public Resource Management Groin page 2 of TREASURER SUMMARY RESULTS PER UNIT AND ANNUAL SUMMARY 42 of 52 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET PER UNIT INFORMATION City of Redlands Treasurer 2006/07 - Recommend teen Service Name Service Annual Current Fee %of Full Gift 100%of Full Current east Recovery Fee Policy Subsidy Policy Type Volume Cost Subsidy Policy Level(%) Level Level 1 Business License-new Fee 1000 $0 0% $52 $52 96" $50 $2' Business License-renewal Fee $500 $0 0% $22 $22 321 $20 $2 3 Yard Sale Permit Fee 884 $2,50 96% $2.60 $010 96% $2:50 $p a) 4 Returned Check Fee 364 $20 57% $35 $15 100% $35 $0 5 All other activity Non fee 1 $0 00/0 $521,768 $521,768 0% $0 $521,768 a) lnclr es the£dank 07arge for NSF; a �s ca ui 11/1$12006 Public Resource Management Group Page 1 of 1 USER FEE STUDY SUMMARY SHEET TOTAL PROGRAM INFORMATION City of Redlands Treasurer 006/07 Recommendations Service Revenue Revenue '100% Current Cost Recovery Revenue Policy Increased Service Name Type Current F %of Full Gast Full Cost, ubsldy Policy Level(%) Level Revenue 1 Business License-new Fee $0 0% $51,946 $51,946 96% $50,000 $50;000' 2 Business License,,renewal Fee $0 0% $119,042 $119,042 92% $1117„000 $110,000 Yard Sale Permit Fee $2;210 96❑l0 $2,296 $86 96% $2,210 $0 4 Returned Check Fee $7„280 57% $12,682 $5,402 100% $12,740 $5,490' 5 All other activity Nan fee $0 0% $521,768 $521„768 0% $0 $0 Total User Fees $8;490 $185,966 $176,476 $174,950 $165,460 %of Full Cast 5% 100% 95% 94% 89% Total Other Services $0 $521,768 $52.1.768 $0 $0 of Full Cast 0% 100°k 100`Yn 0 0°Y Department Totals $9;490 $707,734 $698,244 $174,950 $165,460 %of Full Cost 1% 100% 99% 25% 23% 1111612606 Public Resource Management Group Page 2 of 2' HOURLY RATES AND CITYWIDE COPY CHARGE 45 of 52 CITY OF REDLANDS BUILD ING DIVISION 2006/2007 Blended raverhead rates Full Cost Hourly Hues Position FTE Salary i nefits Overhead Total 1 Chief Bldg Official 1.00 $ 46.86 $ 17.12 $ 104.92 $ 169,91 2 flan Check Examiner 1.901 $ 32.86 $ 12.01 $ 73.57 $ 118.44 3 Building Inspector I 2.010 $ 26:16 $ 9.19 $ 56.34 $ 90-70 4 Building inspector Il 2.00 $ 27.79 $ 10.15 $ 62.21 $ 1b0.15 5 Permit Tech 1.00 $ 23.96 $ 8.75 $ 53.64 $ 86.36 6 Comm Etev Director 0-40 $ 70,56 $ 25.78 $ 157.98 $ 254.33 Ccrrtrpasite Fiate* $ 28.151 $ 10.28 $ 63-031 $ 101.46 These hourly rates were calculated to include staff salary and benefits,proportionate service and supply costs,internal departmental administration,and citywide overhead costs: Hourly salary rate is calculated by dividing annual salary by 1,8010 productive hours. Hourly benefit rate of 36.54%is applied to hourly salary fate. Hourly overhead rate of 163-98%is applied to hourly salary plus benefits. *Notes' The composite rate is weighted by billable hours per positlorr. 46 of 52 CITY OF REDLAND PLANNING DIVISION 2006/2007 Blended overhead rates Full Cost Hourly Rates- t-ftyr r�ttr Position PTE Salary Benefits Overhead Total 1 Principal Plattner 1.00 $ 46: 6 $ 17.53 $ 85.93 -$ 150.33 2 Sr/Jr/AssVAssoc Planner 4.50 $ 33:51 $ 12.54 $ 61.44 $ 107.48 3 Sr.Admin Assistant 1.00 $ 23:96 $ 8.96 $ 43.93 $ 76.86 4 Admin Secretary 1.00 $ 22,25 $ 8.33 $ 40.80 $ 71.38 5 Admin Asst lflf 1.00 $ 20:15 $ 7.54 $ 36.95 $ 64.64 6 Comm Lev Director 6.40 $ 7056 $ 26.40 $ 129.39 $ 22635 7 Comm Dev Asst Director 1,00 $ 56:50 $ 21.14 $ 103.60 $ 181.25 Composite Rate' s 34.96 $ 13.08 $ 54.10 1 $ 112.14 These hourly rates were calculated to include staff salary and benefits, proportionate service and supply costs,:internal departmental administration,and citywide overhead costs. Hourly salary rate is calculated by dividing annual salary by 1,800 productive hours; Hourly benefit rate of 37,41%is applied to hourly salary rate. Hourly overhead rate of 133.44%is applied to hourly salary plus benefits. lNote The composite rate Is welghted by bl/lable hours per position: 47 of 52 CITY OF REDLANDS ADMINISTRATION / ENGINEERING DiviSION 2006/2007 Blended overhead rates Full Cast Hourly Rates Horan Position PTE Salary Benefits Overhead Total 1 Public Works Director 0.M5 $ 72:33 $ 44.63 $ 147,74 $ 260.69 2 Assistant PW Director 0.50 $ 612:37 $ 35.03 $ 127.40 $ 224.79 3 Sr.Civil Engineer 0.15 $ 48.51 $ 27.25 $ 99.09 $ 174,85 Associate Engineer 1.00 $ 38,$5 $ 21.82 $ 79.35 $ 140,42 5 Assistant Engineer 1.00 $ 35:18 $ 19.76 $ 71.87 , 126.81 6 Principal Inspector 0.75 $ 37.19 '3 20.89 $ 75.96 $ 134.03 7 PW Constr. Inspector l/II 1.15 $ 31.45 $ 17.66 $ 64.24 $ 113.35 8 Sr.Admin.Assistant 4.94 $ 2196 $ 13.46 $ 48.94 $ 86.36 9 Admin.Assistant I/14 1.80 $ 19.21 $ 10.79 $ 39.23 $ 69.23 composite Rate" $ 36,26 $ 20.37' $ 74.07 $ 130.70 These hourly rates were calculated to include staff salary and benefits,proportionate service and supply costs,internal departmental administration,and citywide overhead costs: Hourly salary rate is calculated by dividing annual salary by 1,800 productive hours, Hourly benefit rate of$6.17%is applied to hourly salary rate: Hourly overhead rate of 130.8% Is appfied to hourly salary plus benefits., *Note The composite rate is weighted by billable hours firer positlor 48 of 52 CITY OF R I) ANDS POLICE DEPARTMENT 2006/2007 Full Cost Hourly bates Fiourf ii Position FTE Salary Benefits OverheadTotal 1 Chief' 1.00 77.89 $ 82.09 124.11 284.09 2 Deputy Chief 1.00 $ 70.56 $ 74.37 $ 112.44 257.37 3` Captain 1.00 $ 63.93 $ 67.37 101.86 '$ 233,16 4 Lieutenant 4.00; $ 57.92 $ 61.04 $ 92.28 $ 211,24 5 Sergeant 10,00 $ 47,36 $ 49.92 $ 75.47 $ 172.75 Corporal/Investigator 19.00 $ 40,66 $ 42.85 $ 64.79 $ 148.30 7 Officer 54.00 $ 35.85 $ 37.:78 57.12 $ 130,75 8 Support Svcs Supvsr 1.00 $ 38,46 $ 40,53 $ 6129 74(1.28 9 Admin Analyst 1,00 $ 33.17 $ 34.96 $; 52.86 $ 120.99 10 Admin/Exe Asst &Secretary 3.00 $- 26.56 $ 28.09 $ 42.48 $ 97.23 11 Crime Analyst 1,00 $ 30.51 $? 32.15 $ 48.61 $ 111.27 12 Code Enforcement Ofcr/Sr. 2.00 $ 2+3.42 $ 31.00 $ 46.88 $ 107,30 13' Public info Ofcr 1.00 $ 40.07 $ 42.24 $ 6186 $ 146.17 14 Animai Control Supvsr 1,00 $ 28.33 $ 29.86 $ 45.14 $ 103.32 15 Records Supvsr 1.00 $ 28.33 S' 29,86 $' 45.14.' $ 103.32 16 Forensic Svcs Supvsr 1.00 $; 34.51 $ 36.37 $; 54.98 $ 125.86 17 Comm Spvsr 1.00 $ 26.31 $ 27.72 $ 41.92 $ 95.94 18 Forensic Sci Tech 1.00 $ 26.31 $ 27,72 41.92 S 95.94 19' Malnt Worker 1.00 $ 23.83 $ 25.11 $ 37.97 $ 86.90 20 CSO/Dispatcher 1111: 26.00 $ 22.04 $ 23.23 $ 35,12 $ 80.40 21 Video Tech 1.00 $ 201 04 $ .21:12 $' 31.94 $ 7310 22 Cust Svcs Refs; 13.00 $ 2015 $ 21.34 $ 3226 $ 73.85 23 Animal Control Ofcr 3.00 $ 20.54 $ 21.6:5 $ 32.73 $ 74.93 24 parking Control Ofcr 2.00 $ 18:62 $ 19.62 $ 29.67 $ 67.92 5 Kennel Attendant 1.00 $ 15.86 $ 17.77 $ 26.86 $ 61.49 These hourly rates were calculated to include staff salary and benefits,proportionate service and supply casts,,internal departmental administration,and citywide overhead costs. Houdy salary rate is calculated by dividing annual salary by 1:800 productive hours. Hourly benefit rate of 105.,39%is applied to hourly salary rate, Hourly overhead sate of 77,58%is applied to hourly salary plus benefits. 49 of 52 CI FY OF REDLANDS FIRE DEPARTMENT 2006/2007 Mended overhead rates Full Cost Hourly Rates W Position FTE Salary Benefits Overhead Total 1 Chief 1.00 $ 85.49 $ 71.38 $ 94.01 $ 250.89 Deputy Chief 1.00 $ 75,56 $ 63.09 $ 83.98 $ 221.73 Battalion Chief 5.00 $ 62.41 $ 51,77 $ 68.19 $ 181.97 4 Chief Investigator 1-00 $ 42.24 $ 35,27 $ 46.45 $ 123.97 5 Fire Marshal 1.00 $ 6Z01 $ 51.77 $ 58.19 $ 181.97 6 Assistant Fire Marshal 1.00 $ 565.19 $ 46.91 $ 61,79 $ 164.88 7 Fire Captain 15.00 $ 48.34 $ 40.36 $ 53.16 $ 141.86 8 Engineer 15.00' $ 39.88 $ 33°30 $ 43.85 $` 117.03 9 Firefighter/Paramedics 24.00 $ 34.02 $ 28.41 $ 37.41 $ 99.84 10 AdmintstrativeAnalyst 1.00 $ 33,17 $ 27.70 $ 36.48 $ 97.34 11 Admin Assistant lilt 2.00 $ 19.58 $ 16,:35 $ 21.53 $ 57.47 Compos4e Rate' I I $ 40.23 $ 33 59 $ 44.24 $ 118.07 These hourly rates were calculated to include staff salary and benefits,proportionate service and supply costs,internal departmental administration,and citywide overhead costs. Hourly salary rate is calculated by dividing annual salary by 1,800 productive hours. Hourly benefit rate of 83.5%is applied to hourly salary rate. Hourly overhead rate of%93%is applied to hourly salary plus benefits. Wofe.-The composite rate is weighted by billable hours per position. 50 at 52 CITE OF REDLAND RECREATION DIVISION 2006/2007 Blended overhead rates Full Cost Hourly Rates Tari Position FTE 22!a2___ Benefits OverheadTotal 1 Comm Svcs Superintendent 1.00 $ 45:71 $ 15.74 $ 99.99 S 161.44 Sr Rec Program Coord 1 ' $ 26.96 $ 9.28 $ 5$.97 $ 95.21 3 Rec Program Coord 5M' $ 24,43 $ 8.41' $ 53.43 $ 86,27 Bus Driver 1.00 $ 18.62 $ 6.41 $' 40,73 $ 65.76 5 Building Maint Worker 1.t1Ca' $ 23:83 $ 8.217 $ 52.11 $ 84.14 6 Admin Asst Illi 1,{Jt7 $ 211.54 $ 7.07 $ 44.93 72.55 [Composite bate* I is 24.19 $ 8.33 $ 52.91 1 $ 85.44 These hourly rates were calculated to include staff salary and benefits,proportionate service and supply casts,internal departmental administration, and citywide overhead casts. Hourly salary rate is calculated by daviding annual salary by 1,800 productive hours. Hourly benefit rate of 34.43%is applied to hourly salary rate. Hourly overhead rate of 162.7%is applied to hourly salary plus benefits,. *Not . The composite rate is weighted 6.y billable hours per position 51 of 52 Copies of Public Records 1 Labor costs'Admin Assistant @$27.G9per hour(includes only salary and benefits,nmoverhead) 2 Equipment maintenance costs @$O.O5per page 3 Paper costs 4D$O,OU5per page Option A-Best Case Scenario(no interruptions,copier within 1OfeeV: 3Oseconds staff time: $0,23 equipment maintenance: $0.05 paper cost, $0.005 cost per page $029 Option B'Worst Case Scenario(iotennpdonm.copier within 3Ofeeq: GOseconds staff time: $0,46 equipment maintenance: $0�05 paper cost- $0.005 cost per page $0.52 Option C'Average ofA&O 45seconds staff time: $035 equipment maintenance: $0.05 paper cost: cost per page $040 52of 52