HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinances_1788_CCv0001.pdf ORDINANCE NO. 1788
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CI REDLANDS IMPLEMENTING
THE INITIATIVE ORDINANCE TO MODERATE GROWTH WITHIN
THE CITY OF REDLANDS TO PRESERVE THE CITY'S UNIQUE
ENVIRONMENT AND CHARACTER AND REPEALING ORDINANCES
NCS. 1680 , 1717, 1742 , AND 1748
Adapted June I ,: 1982
f
i
ARTICLE 940
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RE LANDS IMPLEMENTING THE INITIA-
TIVE ORDINANCE TO MODERATE GROWTH WITHIN THE CITY OF REDLANDS
TO PRESERVE THE CITY' S UNITE ENVIRONMENT AND CHARACTER
I. DEFINITIONS
II . POINT RATING SYSTEM
A. PREREQUISITE FOR POINT RATINGEVALUATION
B. CONSISTENCY WITH ZONE CLASSIFICATION
AND STANDARDS
C. RELATIONSHIP OF PROJECT TO PUBLIC'"
SERVICES
1 . Location of Project
-. Fire Protection an
Emergency Assistance
3 . Police Protection
4 . Storm and Flood Drainage
5 . Fater Distribution
6 . Sanitary Serer Collection
7 . Streets
8Schools
9 Parks
D. TRACT DESIGN, ARCHITECTURE AND
CONSTRUCTION
1 . Architectural Design Variety'
2 . Site and Grading Design
. Circulation
4. Landscaping
. Open Space Public or Private )
a . Preservation of Agriculture
7 . Preservation of Cultural and
Historical Resources
h
n- 1
w.,. des x
E. LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING
Ill. PROCEDURE FOR DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION
A. PREREQUISITES AND ENTITIES ASSIGNING
POINTS
B . APPLICATION
C. FILING AND ALLOCATION DATES
D. REVIEW
E. ALLOCATION
F. TIE'S
G TRANSFER UP DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATIONS
H. EXPIRATION
I . OUTSIDE WATER AND SEWER CONNECTIONS
TV. EMERGENCY SITUATIONS OR IMPACTION CE PUBLIC
FACILITIES OR SERVICE'S
V. FURTHER GUIDELINES
VT . SEVERANCE
VII. REPEALS>
VITT . PUBLICATION
I
s
—2—
ORDINANCE NO. 1.755
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CE RE, LA:N S IMPLEMENTING 'HINITIA-
TIVE ORDINANCE TO MODERATE GROWTH WITHIN THE CITE" OF REDL NQS
TO PRESERVE THE CITY' S UNIQUE ENVIRONMENT AND CHARACTER
WHEREAS , between the years of 1970 and. 1976 , inclusive, an
average of 220 dwelling units were constructed annually in
Redlands . The number of permits for residential construction
increased to over 1,200 units in 197; and to over 2 ,400 in
1978. A number of factors came together to produce this
substantial increase in growth, including an increased demand
for housing and the implementation of growth limiting policies
or moratoria on the part of several cities in the nearby area,
WHEREAS , this rapid rate of growth has been found by a majority
of the people of the City of Redlands to have caused condi-
tions harmful to the.: public health, safety and general welfare,
and has resulted or will soon result in overcrowding of schools ;
deteriorating water quality and sewage treatment ent capacity,,
inadequate police and fire protection, increasing traffic
congestion, inadequate parks and recreation facilities, loss
of irreplaceable agricultural land, loss of open space , in-
creased air pollution, deterioration of older urban areas
g,enera.l, urban sprawl , and a substantial increase in the cost
of government services ;
WHEREAS , the people have declared that the foregoing condi-
tions can be avoided: or alleviated by the enactment of a
program designed to encourage planned residential growth
within existing urban areas and coordinated with necessary
public facilities ;
WHEREAS, on November 7 , 1978, the voters of the City of
Redlands approved an initiative ordinance to moderate the rate
of growth within the City Proposition, 11R" ) ;
WHEREAS , the City was directed in that ordinance to adopt a
competitive evaluation systema within: 90 days from the date of
adoption o: ` the initiative ordinance
WHEREAS, such a system was duly adopted by Ordinance 1680 , and
was thereafter aiaaended in Ordinances 1717 , 1742 and 1748 ;
WHEREAS the system has now operated for some three years., and
changes in circumstances and the wisdom of experience dictate
that additional amendments consistent with the letter an
spirit of Proposition "R" be enacted;
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY CP REDLANS does ordain s .follows
SECTIONONE: That Chapter 94 of the Redlands Ordinance
Cone be amended as follows
WU
CHAPTEP, 94
IMPLEMENTATION OF :PROPOSITION "R"fi
ARTICLE 940
COMPETITIVE EVALUATION AND SELECTION
PROCESS FOR SUBDIVISIONS
SECTION I DEFINITIONS
A. "Development Allocation" - approval required after
tentative subdivision neap approval and as a- condi-
tion precedent to obtaining a building permit for
dwelling unit . Each development allocation shall be
assigned to a particular property.
E. "Annual Allocation" - 450 development allocations
per calendar year within the. City limits , with sewer
or water service allotments to not more than 150
dwelling units outside the corporate boundaries in
any calendar year.
CA "Applicant" - the owner, developer or authorized
agent who applies for a development allocation for a:
particular property_.
D. "Exempt from Allocation":
1 . A development consisting of four or fewer
single-family dwelling units .
. The construction of a fourplex or a lessen
number of multiple dwellings on a single lot
which the owner, developer or agent did riot
create through the subdivision process-.
3 . The construction of a single-family residence
on a single lot which the owner, developer, or
agent :did not create through the subdivision
process . This exemption applies only to indi-
vidual construction of 'homes (sometimes caller;
""owner-built" homes ) , and not to subdivisions
for the purpose of lot sales . Any such subdi-
vision is subject to the allocation require-
ments of Proposition "R" and this ordinance .
25001:. ,
' 3. M a'
4. Projects undertaken with the assistance of
governmental funding to provide dwelling units
for low-income persons or senior citizens .
5 .. The construction of buildings to be used for
industrial or commercial purposes .
E. "Construction yeas" - a period of helve months with
the first such twelve-month period commencing
January 1 , _1' 79 and subsequent twelve-month periods
beginning on the same date in each succeeding year.
F. ""'Dwelling" -_ a single-family residence, an apart-
ment ,
art-ment , or a. mobi lehome.
G. "Development" any plan by a landowner or his
authorized representative to construct or place five
or more dwelling units on a particular parcel of
land within a particular area of the City . Each
development needs an allocation equal to the number
of dwelling units planned, unless expressly exempt.
H. "Existing Development" - land containing; structures
permitted by right of zone, including vacant land
having a recorded subdivision or finalized appli-
cation as defined in Ordinance No. 1000 as amended:.
I "Pa.rcel" - the specific area: of a property proposed
for a development allocation.
J. "Project" - any plan by a landowner or his autho-
rized representative to construct or place five or
more dwelling units on a particular parcel of land
that has been submitted for a development allocation;
during any one allocation review period.,
SECTION ll --POINT TI G SYSTEM
Each application for competitive evaluation of a major
subdivision residential development shall be given a point
rating pursuant to this ordinance,. A minimum total: of 75
points is required .for any project to receive development
allocations . The following categories will be used in the
Point Rating System,
A. PREREQUISITE FOR POINT RATING EVALUATION
The project must be in fell compliance with the
Redlands General. Plan and all its elements .
-3-
i
{
POINTS
P CONSISTENCY WITH ZONE CLASSIFICATION Maximum 5
AND STANDARDS
1 Project significantly exceeds the 5
property development standards of
the zone in several, substantive ways
. Project significantly exceeds
the property development standards
of the zone in at Least one sub--
stantive way.
,. Project just meets- property dev'el-
opment standards .
C. RELATIONSHIP CP PROJECT TO PUBLIC SERVICES Maximum 66
1,. Location of ProjectMaximum 15
a Project abuts existing development 15.
n at least three sides
b. Project abuts existing develop- 1
ment on two sides .
C. Project abuts existing develop 5
r ent on one side or is sur-
rounded by developed properties
in close proximity.
2 . Fire Protection and Emergency Maximum 5
.assistance
a. Project is within a. four-minute
fire protection response time
and by itself will not require
any additional stations , equip-
ment , or personnel ,
b. Project is within a six-minute
fire protection response time
and by itself' will not require
any additional stations , equipment ;
or personnel .
C . Project is within an eight-
minute response time and by
itself will not require any
additional stations , equipment ,
or personnel .
4-
m M t'S Si
G-
d. Project is beyond an eight- -5
minute response time or will
require by i eself an additional
station or additional equipment
r personnel,,
.. Police Protection,
Delete entire category
4 . Storm and Flood Drainage Maximum 10
a. Points shall be awarded on the
basis of the storm grater drain
index snap on file in the Public
Works Department showing the
four drainage basins within the
City as follows:
(a) San Timoteo Creek drainage 1
basin
Morey Arroyo drainage basin 0 or
(c) Santa. Aria River drainage
basin 0 to 10
(d) Mill Creek Zanja
drainage basin 5, 0 or -1
c
an
...,: fir,,
x Water Distribution Maximum 7
a,. Existing water delivery system
to project meets Citystandards
for water service and fire pro-
tection without any City cost
participation.
b= Additional water delivery
system improvements are re-
quired to enable the project t
meet City standards for water
service and/or fire protection,,
but without any City cost
participation:.
C. .additional grater delivery
system improvements are re-
quired to enable the project to
meet City standards for water
service and/or fire protection
and City cost participation would
normally occur, but instead the
project owner defrays all such
City costs .
d. Additional hater delivery
system improvements are re-
quired to enable the project to
meet City standards for water
service and/or fire protection
and City cast participation is
required.
6 . Sanitary Sewer Collection Maximum 7
a. Existing sewer system to pro-
j ct meets City standards with>
sufficient transmission and treat-
ment capacity to serve project
without any City cost participation.
-6-
401,
$gf
s
b. Additional sewer system improve
ments are required to enable the
project to meet City standards with
sufficient transmission and treat-
ment capacity to serve project
but without any City cost partici-
pation.
artici-p i n.
C. Additional sewer system improve= 2
inerts are required to enable the
project to meet City standards
with sufficient transmission and
treatment capacity to serve pro;-
ject, and City cost participation;
would normally occur, but instead
the project owner defrays all such
City caste.
d. Additional suer system improve-
ments are required to enable the
project to meet City standards with
sufficient transmission and treat-
ment capacity to serve project , and
.City cost participation is required.
7 . Streets Maximum 5
a:. Public o,ff-site improvements are
improvements (excluding traffic
signals) which require a City con-
tribution. Said improvements are
either "minor improvements , "
maj or improvements , " or "major
capital improvements" as listed
below;
1.) Minor improvements are the:
construction of curb and
gutter, sidewalk, paving
and otter such typical
roadway construction esti-
mated to cost less than
X25 ,000 .
2 Major improvements are the
construction of curb and
gutter,; sidewalk, paving
and other such typical
roadway construction esti-
mated to cost between
25 ,00 and $100 ,000.
-
y
3 Major capital improvements
are the typical construc-
tion
ons r ction of new streets or the
typical =widening and recon-
struction
econ-str ction of existing
streets estimated to cost
more than 100 ,000 .
b Project can be served by the 5
existing street system and will
not necessitate any public off-site
improvements within, 1/4 mile of
its boundary .
C. Project can be served by the
existing street system but will
necessitate minor public off-site
improvements within 1 ;Wile of its
boundary.
d, Project can be served by the 0
the existing street system but will
necessitate major public off-site
improvements within 1/4 mile of its
boundary.
e. Project requires major capital - '
improvements within 1/4 mile of
its boundary.
. Schools Maximum 10
a. Project located within safe 4'
walking distance of an elemen-
tary school as defined by the
school district.
b'. Project located within safe
walking distance of a junior
high school as defined by the
school district.
C. Project located within safe
walking distance of a senior
high school as defined by the-
school district,
I
t,w,
. upon completion and occupancy of _::
of the project unsafe pedestrian
access exists or will exist from
the project to any school serving
the project as determined by the
school district.
. project uses one or more School -l.
service levels declared impacted
pursuant to city and district
policies.
9. Parks Maximum 2
. Project located within 1/2 mile 2-
of a developed park.
b. project located. within /fit mile I
of a developed park.
C. Project looted within 1/2 mile l
of a City-owned undeveloped
park site.
D. TRACT DESIGN, ARCHITECTURE AND CONSTRUCTION Maximum 5
1 . Architectural Design Variety Maximum l
. In a. single- family detached 1 each,
dwelling project, variations 10 maximum
in excess of the number legally`
req iced by the City Subdivision
Ordinance.
"Variation" ;shall include signi-
ficant
i ni-ficant differences in exterior
construction materials and roof-
ing treatments , as well as variety
in color and building profiles.
b. In a planned residential develop- 0 , 2, 4, 6,
ment or a multiple-family dwelling 8 or 10
project , architectural elevations
:shall be evaluated and incremental
points awarded based upon incre-
ments in design quality, consistency
with neighborhood , and durability
and appearance of exterior construc-
tion
nst c-tion ma.teria:ls including roofing..
- -
4 r
C. Lot sale subdivision where lots
will be scald in groups of no,
greater than four. This para-
graph does not apply to a iobile-
home subdivision.
d`. Lot sale subdivision were lots 15
will be sold individually, no
standard or generalized housing
product will be sold in that pro-
ject by
ro-ject' by the subdivider, and the sub-
divider does not directly or
indirectly case any housing pro-
duct to be built in that project .
.
This paragraph does not apply to
a mobilehome subdivision.
2. Site and Grading Design Maximum 1
a. The arrangement of lots or
design of foundations and floor
systems minimi. es- grading to a
point: substantially less than that
legally permitted.
b. Consideration of onsite eco-
logic-ally sensitive areas
(flood plain, major natural
drainage swales , unstable soils-,
and steep slopes) .
C. Internal lotting pattern is
curvilinear, not a grid system.
d. Favorable orientation, of units
(any combination of variable set-
backs , provision of open spaces ,
preservation of special views ,
solar access , unusual privacy) .'
3 . Circulation Maximum
a.. Avoidance: of conflict with;
neighboring street intersections
except as; required by General. Plan.
b-. Special consideration for esi-
dential privacy and, pedestrian
safety (through use of cul-de-sacs ,
-way intersections and similar
amenities) .
_10-
i
p�0r
C. Two or more access roads for
public safety service.
4. Landscaping Maximum 10
a., Preservation of all existing
ornamental trees and basic
land--forms
b . Amount , quality, size and variety 1, 3, 5
of landscaping and screening, or
including screening of undesirable
features . Not less than five 15-
gallon trees per unit are required
for minimum credit ; unusually
abundant and mature planting and
screening is required for maximum
credit.
C. Covenants , conditions and restric--
tions establishing a homeowners '
association with full responsibility
hath cin- and off-site maintenance
have been drafted and submitted to
the City, and will be imposed as a
condition: of sale;,
5. Open Space (Public or Private): Maximum 5
a,. Provision, of substantial amount
of private common open space.
h. Provision of unusually extensive
private recreation facilities .
6 . Preservation of Agriculture Maximum 1
a,. Project has not required removal
of land from an agricultural
preserve.
b. Project did not require the 5
rezoning of land erne for
agriculture.
10
c . Project will not be located 5
immediately adjacent to an
agricultural preserve.,
d-. Project will be located in -3
immediately vicinity of land
ander Williamson Act contract.
7 Preservation of Cultural and Maximum 5
Historical Resources
a. Preservation of historically /feature
significant resources , includ-
ing buildings , walls , cutstne
curbing or landscaping.
b. Project dries not adversely
impact character or setting of
any historical or cultural
resource in close proximity to
or within the project.
The recommendation of the City Historic
and Scenic Preservation Commission shall
be a prerequisite to a print award hereunder.
E. LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING: Maximum 15
1 . To implement Proposition "R, " this
Council finds that provision of approxi-
mately
pp oxi-mately 10 lour and moderate income
housing within: new residential devel-
opments ents i in the public interest
Therefore
a.. Project with dwelling unit(s) /unit
provided for low income per-
sons at correlative prices as
established by the United States
Department of Housing and urban
Development .
b Project with dwelling unit(s) 1/unit
provided for moderate income
persons at correlative prices as
established by the Unites States
Department of Housing and Urban
Development .
-12-
2 . In order to qualify for points under
this subsection, the project developer
shall file a. detailed written statement
indicating the proposed method d of pre-
vision, and shall be prepared to con-
tract with the City assuring same.e.. Ire
addition, the favorable recommendation
of the City Housing Commission shall
be a prerequisite to the award of an
points hereunder.
Low Income /unit
Moderate Income 1/unit
SECTION III - PROCEDURE FOR DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION
A. PREREQUISITES AND ENTITIES ASSIGNING POINTS
1. Tentative Approval Required
In order to assure that a project is
in final approval form as required b
Proposition "R," the project shall be
environmentally assessed and tenta-
tively
nta:-ti.vely a.pproved by the Planning Com-
mission and City Council before an
application for development alloca-
tions
.11oc --tions can he filed.
2. Point Assignments
The Planning Commission will assign;
points in the fallowing categories :
Consistency with: Zone Classifications
and Standards
Architectural Design Variety
Site and Grading Design
Circulation
Landscaping
Open Space
. The City staff will assign points in
the fallowing categories :
Relationship to Public Services
Preservation of Agriculture
Preservation, of Cultural and
Historical Resource
Low and; Moderate Income Housing
-1
oesi g-l
k
AN, K'
" ,
4. The Redlands Unified School District
("District" ) will assign points in the
Schools category .
E> APPLICATION
Following environmental review and tentative approval-
of the project by the City, the, applicant= shall submit an
application for development allocations on; forms provided by
the Planning Department.
Applications do not require the preparation of final
engineering or construction plans in order: to be considered
however,, all rehired information must be of sufficient detail
to clearly illustrate the proposal .
Incomplete or partial applications will not be
accepted . Only one application is allowed per allocation
period on the same property. In order for the City to review
projects as fairly as possible , the written statement must
describe hour the propose: project meets the criteria of
Section II., The written =statement is important since the;
developer will have no further opportunity to explain how the
development in question meets the criteria of this ordinance,
C FILING AND ALLOCATION DATES
Semiannual. allocations for 225 units will be made on
or before June 30 and november 30 yearly. Therefore, the
closing dates for application filings will be May 15 and
October 15 . However, notwithstanding the above and because of
unavoidable delays in the reenactment of this ordinance, the
first allocation date for 1982 shall be September 7 and the
first filing deadline fon 1982 shall be July 15. pricer to the
filing deadline, plans and written material submitted as part
of an application are not open for public review; however,
after the filing deadline has passed, all material that has
been submitted as part of an application is then open, for
public review.
D. REVIEW
When an applicat=ion has been determined to be com-
plete and timely filed, it shall proceed to staff, planning
Commission and District review. Once submitted for allocation,
a project may not be altered. The planning staff will meet
with representatives of the various City departments and
appropriate Commissions to review each project and assign
numerical values based on the criteria in Section ll .,
-14-
iY „
Following the review period, the planning staff
shall issue an eValUati(ni of all projects requesting devel-
opment allocations numerical values assigned to each. The
report assigning numerical values to each project shall_ be
open for public review prior to the actual allocation awards
by the City Council .
E. ALLOCATION
At a public meeting,, the City Council shall evaluate
all recommended point assignments , hear from the applicant and
the ,general public if requested., and award the development
allocations pursuant to this ordinance . Projects receiving 75
points will be considered for awards , with higher priority
being given to projects with higher point values. A maximum
of 35 development allocations may be awarded to any project in
any single allocation period, unless this limit and the total
successful applications result in less than 225 development
allocations being awarded . If the latter occurs , the excess
allocations will be prorated among successful projects
applying for more than 35 allocations on the basis of the
relative; number applied for rmeasured against the number
remaining.
The decision of the City Council on development
allocation awards is final..
F. TIES
Should more than one project receive the same passing
point score hereunder, but insufficient development allocations
are available to provide both projects with their requested
totals , each project will receive an equitably prorated share
of the remaining allocations based on initial applications .
C TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATIONS
A development allocation is awarded hereunder based
upon the particular location and characteristics of a specific
development proposal on a specific site, and may not therefore
be transferred to another site or used for another development
proposal.. However, a. development allocation may be transferred
with City Council approval to successors in interest who
acquire title to the specific development proposal on the
specified site, upon proof satisfactory to the City Attorney
that legal title has so passed.
H EXPIRATION
development allocation expires- and is of no fur-
ther effect if:
-15-
ggwng
X
r.>
(1) the underlying tentative map or use permit
expires , or
( the development allocation is not utilized
within two years of the date of its award: "Utilized" means
receipt of final project approval: and issuance of at last
one building permit for construction of residential unit
other than model homes therein,.
1. OUTSIDE WATER AND SEWER CONNECTIONS
The City Council shall: implement Section 6 of Propo-
sition "R" by allotting tap to 150 water and sewer connections
per year within the unincorporated area covered by the City' s
sphere of influence and based: on the recommendations of the
County of San. Bernardino . However, no allotments shall be
made to projects which conflict with the intent of Proposition
"R" or the General„ Plait as interpreted by tete City Councilor
SECTION I y EMERGENCY SITUATIONS OR IMPACTION OF PUBLIC
-..._ . �. ._ e _. _ w.
"ACILITIES-ORSE �'I �ES
No further development approvals of any kind or sewer or
water connections shall" be approved by the City when an emer-
gency situation or impaction of public facilities or services
has been identified by the appropriate agency; Such condi-
tions
tions shall: be any one or more of the following:
1 . Notification of a City department , other public agency,
or the District that its ability to meet the public needs
is impacted . Such notice shall be presented to the City
Council in writing, and be followed with a presentation
by the impacted agency to the City Council in public
sessions to provide detailed, clear and convincing evi-
dence of an emergency or impaction In, the event of
notification by the District , the requirements of
Ordinance No . 1740 shall apply in addition to the above .
. . Before the close of filing for an allocation period ,
purveyors of City and School services shall notify the
City Manager if their particular service would be impacted
by the award of development allocations to the applica-
tions to be considered that; period. If emergency or
impaction is declared and concurred with by the. City
Council, no development allocation shall be approved
without attaching a requirement that no building permit
shall be issued until documentation has been received
from the declaring agency that such impaction has been
adequately mitigated. This requirement stall remain in
force until the declaration of emergency or impaction is
rescinded by tete declaring agency, or as otherwise deter-
mined by the City Council by resolution.
E
-1
j
3 . Any other danger to the public safety or welfare 'which
the City Council determines to exist for the purpose of
this section.
If the -dwelling unit (s) under consideration on. is/are outside
the City limits , any and all: mitigating measures arising from:
declaration, of emergency or impaction shall apply if the City
supplies water and/or serer services , and if a tater and/or
sewer emergency or impaction exists ..
In the event the City Council concurs that such emergency
or impaction exists , no .further development approvals of any
kind and/or sewer or water connection, permits shall be issued
except when approved by a majority of the City Council for
each applicant considered individually, after it has determined
that the specific project will not contribute additionally to
the existing emergency or impaction situation, or upon notice
by the appropriate agency that the specific project has ade-
quately mitigated. .its additional impact,..
SECTION V a `FURTHER GUIDELIN
l_ Proposition "R" and this ordinance may be implemented by
resolution to further the purposes set forth in Proposi-
tion
ropos -tion "R. '"
2. All lots created by the subdivision process , whether or
not initially subject to this ordinance, Ordinance No.
1680 and subsequent amendments or related ordinances ,
that are capable of being further subdivided under the
State Map Act and local ordinances existing at the time
of subdivision,, shall have the final plat mag stamped.
with a note stating that, "Any further subdivision will
be subject to the development allocation process under
the pro-visions of Proposition "R" as implemented by City
ordinance. "
SECTIO VI SEVERANCE
If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordi-
nance is for any reason held- to be invalid or unconstitutional,
the remaining portions of the ordinance shall not be affected
thereby,.. This ordinanceand each section, sentence , clause
and phrase hereof would have been prepared., proposed, adopted,
approved and ratified irrespective of the fact that any one or
more other sections sentences , clauses or phrases could be
declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTIO VII° - REPEALS
Most of the substance of this ordinance has already been
enacted by the City in Ordinances 1680, 1717, 1742 or 1748 .
-17-
The ares in which major substantive changes are made are agri-
cultural preservation, schools, and in the procedures by which
allocations are made. However, in order to allow citizens,
developers, and City :staff members to comprehend the inter-
relationship
-relationship of and comply with these requirements,, it; appears
better practices to compiles them all an one place for ease of
reference. For this reason, this ordinance replaces prior
point systems ordinances:, and ordinances 1680_, 1717, 1742, and
1748 are hereby repealed.
SECTION " IIS' - PUBLICATION
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance
and shall cause the sante to be published once in the Redlands
Daily Facts, a newspaper of general circulation printed and
published in the City 'of Redlands.
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED thial
3 P
M yor of the City of~,5 , dla .ds
ATTEST:
uty 8J..t�'°,'"� ear
I , Lorne Peyer, Deputy City Clerk, City of Redlands, hereby
certify that the foregoing ordinance was duly adopted by the City
Council: at an j ,� regular meeting thereof held on the 15th
day of June, 1982 , by the following vote :
AYES : Councilmembers DeMirjyn, Martinez , Carman, Johnson
Mayor loth
OE € rt e
ABSENT: None
ty City,,, irk