HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinances_1843_CCv0001.pdf ORDINANCE NO. 1845
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDLAND
IMPLEMENTING THE INITIATIVE ORDINANCE
TO MODERATE GROWTH WITHIN THE CITY OF
REDLANDS TO PRESERVE THE CITY ' UNIQUE
ENVIRONMENT AND CHARACTER AND REPEALING
ORDINANCES NO. 1788 , 1801 , 1818 AND 1825
90 A MEN
ARTICLE 940
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS IMPLEMENTING THE
INITIATIVE ORDINANCE TO MODERATE GROWTH WITHIN THE
CITY OF R.EDLANDS TO PRESERVE THE CITY' S UNIQUE
ENVIRONMENT AND CHARACTER. AND REPEALING ORDINANCES
NO. 1788 , 1801 1818 and 1825
I . DEFINITIONS
II. POINT RA'T'ING SYSTEM
A. PREREQUISITE FOR POINT RATING EVALUATION
B. CONSISTENCY WITH ZONE CLASSIFICATION AND
STANDARDS
C . RELATIONSHIP OF PROSECT TO PUBLIC SERVICES
1 . Location of Project'
2 . Eire Protection and Emergency
Assistance
3 . Stora and Flood Drainage
4. Water Distribution
5 . Sanitary Sewer Collection
., Streets
7 , Schools
8 . Parks
D. 'TRACT ;DESIGN, ARCHITECTURE AND CONSTRUCTION
1 , Architectural Design
2. Site and Grading Design
3 . Circulation
. Landscaping
5 Open Space
t yy N,
6 , Preservation of Agriculture
-. Preservation of Cultural and
Historical Resources
E. LOW ANIS MODERATE INCOME HOUSING
III . PROCEDURE FCR DEVELOPMENT .ALLOCATION
A. PREREQUISITES ANIS ENTITIES ASSIGNING POINTS
B . APPLICATION
C. FILING AND ALLOCATION DATES
D. REVIEW
E. ALLOCATION
F. TIES
G . ALTERATION OF APPROVED PROJECTS
H. TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATIONS
I EXPIRATION
J . OUTSIDE WATER. AND SEWER CONNECTIONS
IV. EMERGENCY SITUATIONS OR IMPACTION OF PUBLIC
FACILITIES OR SERVICES
V. FURTHER GUIDELINES
Vi . SEVERANCE
VII,. REPEALS
VIII . PUBLICATION
ORDINANCE NO. 1843
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITE' OF REDLANIDS IMPLEMENTING THE. INITIA-
TIVE ORDINANCE TO MODERATE GROWTH WITHIN THE CITE' OF REDLANDS
TO PRESERVE THE CITY' S UNIQUE ENVIRONMENT AND CHARACTER AND
REPEALING ORDINANCES NO. 1788, 1801 , 1818 and 1825
WHEREAS , between the years of 1970 and 1976 , inclusive, ars
average of 220 dwelling wits were constructed annually in
Redlands-. The number of permits for residential construction
increased to over 1 ,200 units in 1977 and to over 2 ,400 in
1978 . A number of factors carne together to produce this
substantial increase in growth, including an increased demand
for housing and the implementation of ;growth limiting policies
or moratoria on the part of several cities in the nearby area,
WHEREAS, this rapid rate of growth was found by a majority of
the people of the City of Redlands to have caused conditions
harmful to the public health,, safety and general welfare, and
has resulted or may soon result in overcrowding of schools ,
deteriorating water quality and sewage treatment capacity,
inadequate police and, fire protection, increasing traffic
congestion, inadequate parks and recreation facilities , loss
of irreplaceable agricultural land, loss of open space , in-
creased air pollution, deterioration of older urban areas,
general urban sprawl, and a substantial increase in the cost
of government services ;
WHEREAS , the people have declared that the foregoing conditions
can be avoided or alleviated by the enactment of a program
designed to encourage planned residential growth within existing
urban areas and coordinated with necessary public facilities ,
WHEREAS,; on November 7 , 1978, the voters of the City o
Redlands approved an initiative ordinance to moderate the rate
of growth within the City (Proposition "R" ) ;
WHEREAS , the City was directed in that ordinance to adopt a
competitive evaluation system within 90 days from the date of
adoption of the initiative ordinance
WHEREAS , such a system was duly adopted by Ordinance 1680 , and
was thereafter amended it Ordinances 1717 , 174 , 1748 , 1788,,
1.801, 1818 and 1825
WHEREAS , the system has now operated for some four years , and
changes in circumstances and the wisdom of experience dictate
that additional amendments consistent with the letter and
spirit of Proposition "R" be enacted;
THE CITY CCU #CIL OF THE CITY OF R.E DL N1DS does ordain as follows
SECTION ONE: That Chapter 94 of the Redlands Ordinance
Code be amended as follows
CHAPTER 94
IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPOSITION "R",
ARTICLE 940
COMPETITIVE EVALUATION AND SELECTION
PROCESS FOR SUBDIVISIONS
SECTION I - DEFINITIONS
A "Development Allocation" - approval required after
tentative subdivision reap approval and as a condi-
tion precedent to obtaining a building permit for a.
dwelling unit. Each development allocation shall b
assigned to a particular property.
B. "Annual Allocation" - 450 development allocations
per calendar year within the City limits , with sewer
or water service allotments to not more than 150
dwelling units outside the corporate boundaries in:
any calendar year.
C. "Applicant" - the yawner., developer or authorized
agent who applies for a. development allocation for a
particular property .
D. "Exempt from Allocation" :
1. A development consisting of four or fewer
single- family dwelling units_.
' . The construction of a fourplex or a lesser
number of multiple dwellings on a single lot'
which the owner, developer or agent did not
create through the subdivision: process_.
3 . The construction of asingle-family home by an
individual in a. development in which the
subdivider or his agent or contractor is
constructing no more than four dwelling units .
4 A residential development constructed pursuant
to the authorization given; in November, 1978 ,
y BallotMeasures "B" and "S
5-. The construction of buildings to be used for
industrial or commercial purposes .
Age XX„n.
E. "Construction year" _ a period of twelve months with
the first such twelve-month period commencing;
January 1 1979 and subsequent twelve-month periods
beginning on the same date in each succeeding year.
F. "Dwelling" - a single-family residence , an, apart-
ment , or a moblehume
C. ""Development" - any plan by a landowner or his
authorized representative to construct or place five
or more dwelling units on a particular parcel of
land within a particular area of the City. Each
development needs an allocation equal to the number
of dwelling units planned , unless expressly exempt-.
H. "Existing Development" - land containing structures
permitted by right of zone, including vacant land
having a recorded subdivision or finalized appli-
cation
pplication, as defined in Ordinance No . 1000 as amended.
i,
1 . "Parcel" - the specific area of a property proposed
for a development allocation
J "Project" any plan by a landowner or his autho-
rized representative to construct or place five or
more dwelling unitsona particular parcel of land>
that has been submitted for a development allocation
during any one allocation review period.
SECTION 11 - POINT RATING- SYSTEM
Each application for competitive evaluation of a Tajo
subdivision residential development shall be given a point
rating pursuant to this ordinance . A minimum total of
75 paints is required for any project to receive development
allocations . The following categories will be used in the
Point Rating System:
A. PREREQUISITE FOR POINT RATING EVALUATION
The project must be in full compliance with the
Redlands General Plan and all its elements ,
POINTS<
B . CONSISTENCY WITH ZONE CLASSIFICATION Maximum
AND STANDARDS
1-» Project significantly exceeds the
property development standards of the
zone in three or more substantive ways.
3-
a
. Project significantly exceeds
the property development standards
of the zone in at least one sub-
stantive
ub®sta.ntive way .
Project just meets property de et 0
npment standards
CRELATIONSHIP OF PROJECT TO PUBLIC SERVICES Maximum 61
1 , Location of Project Maximum l
a:. Project abets existing development 1
on at least three sides .
b . Project abuts existing develop 13
anent on two sides .
C . Project abets existing develop-
spent on one side or is sur-
rounded by developed properties
in close: proximity.
. Fire Protection and Emergency Maximum ltd
Assistance
a:;. Project is within one and one-half
miles of a first-due engine.
company and ' wo and one-half miles
of a ladder service company .
b Project is within two chiles of a
first-,due engine company and
three miles of a ladder service
company .
c. Project is within two and one-half
miles of a first-due engine
company and three and one-half
miles of a ladder service company,.
d. All structures are sprinklered:
pursuant to NFPA Residential
Sprinkler Pamphlet 13D.
-4-
dom
3 . Storm and Flood Drainage Maximum 5
a'. Points shall, be awarded on the
basis of the percentage of coverage
of the total, lot area or project
area by the roof area and all paved
areas on site . The coverage per-
centage shall be exclusive of
streets and public rights of way.
Points
35% but not less than 30% 1
30% but not less than 25% 2
25% but not less than 20% 3
20% but not less than 15% 4
15% or less 5
35% but not more than 40% 0
40% but not more than 45% -1
45% but not more than 50% -2
50% but not more than 55% -
5a but not more than 60% --
0
0% or more -5
Developer is required to submit an
analysis of the percentage of
covered or paved area with his/her
application. Percentage to be
calculated in the same manner by
which the City calculates the area
for drainage fees.
b. Points shall be awarded to single 5
family residential projects to be
built on lots no less than one
acre net. This subsection shall
not apply to planned unit develop-
ments, planned residential develop-
ments, condominiums, multiple
family developments, and mobile
home park developments.
4 . Water Distribution Maximum 7
a. Existing water distribution system 7
to project meets City standards
for water service and fire protec-
tion, and project owner agrees in
writing 4L--.o defray any customary
City costs.
b. Additional water distribution system
improvements are required to enable
the project to meet City standards
for water service and/or fire pro-
tection and City cost participation
would normally occur, but instead
the project owner agrees in writing
to defray all such City costs.
C. Additional water delivery -
system improvements are re-
quired to enable the project to
meet Citystandards for water'
service and/or fire protection
and City cast participation is
required'
5 . Sanitary Sewer Collection Maximum 7
a-.. Existing sewer system to pro
,sect meets City standards with
sufficient transmission and treat-
ment capacity to serve project ,
and project owner agrees in writing;
to defray any customary City casts .
b Additional serer system improve
ments are required to enable the
project to meet City standards
with sufficient transmission and
treatment capacity to serve pro-
ject , and City cost participation
would normally occur, but instead
the project owner agrees in writing
to defray all such City casts
C. Additional sewer system improve -
ments are required to enable the
project to meet City standards with
sufficient transmission and treat-
ment capacity to serve project , and
City cost participation is required.
. Streets Maximum
a. Public off-site improvements are
improvements excluding traffic
signals ) which require a City con-
tribution, Said improvements are
either "minormimpro+ r.y�ver�e� ts ,, "
It major ajor
capital improvements" as listed
below:
1. Miner improvements are the
construction of curb and
gutter,_ sidewalk, paving
and other such typical.,
roadway construction esti-
mated to cost less than.
�25 , 000.
-6-
15
( ) Major improvements are the
construction of curb and
gutter, sidewalk, paving`
and ether such typical
roadway construction esti-
mated to cast between
$25,000 and $100 ,000 .
( ) Major capital improvements
are the typical construc-
tion
nstruc-tier of new streets or the:
typical widening and recon-
struction of existing
streets estimated to cost
more than $100 , 000 .
b. Project can be served by the 5
existing street system and will.
not contribute to the need for
any public off-site improvements
within 1/4 mile of its boundary.
C. Project can be served by the
existing street system but will
contribute to the meed for mincer
public off-site improvements
e Thin 1/4 mile of its boundary.
d,. Project can be served by the
existing street system but will
contribute to the heed for major
public off-site improvements
within. 1/4 mile of its boundary.
e. Project requires major capital _5
improvements within 1/4 mile of
its boundary.
7 . Schools Maximum 1
a . Project located within: safe walking
distance of an elementary school
s defined by the school district_.
b project located within safe walking
distance of a junior high school
as defined by the school district.
C. project located within safe walking
distance of a, senior high school
as defined by the school. district
d. Upon completion and occupancy o .-
the project unsafe pedestrian:
access exists or will exist from
the project to any school serving;
the project as determined by the
school district.
d . Project uses one or more school -10
service levels declared impacted
pursuant to city and district
policies .
. parks Maximum
a. Project located within 1/2 mile
of a developed park.
b'. Project located within 3/4 mile l
of a developed park_.
C. Project located within 1/2 mile 1
of a City-owned undeveloped
park site
�= TRACT DESIGN, ARCHITECTURE AND CONSTRUCTION Maximum- 6 '
1 . Architectural Design: Maximum l
Elevations shall be evaluated and a to lfl
:incremental points awarded based
upon increments in design quality,
consistency with neighborhood, and
durability and appearance of exterior
construction materials including
roofing
. site and Grading Design Maximum 13
a. For land with 5`/ slope or I to 6
greater, the lot arrangement
and/or foundation and floor
system design , reduces grading
to a level substantially less-
than; legally permitted.
b . For land with less than 5% slope, 1 to 6
favorable orientation of units
(any combination of variable set-
backs , provision, of open spaces ,
preservation of special views ,
solar access , unusual privacy)
44.r. A ,
C . Consideration of onsite ecce
logically sensitive areas
(flood plain, major natural
drainage swal s , unstable soils ,
and steep slopes )
d. Internal lotting and street'
pattern is curvilinear (not
a grid system) .
3 . Circulation Maximum 7
a-.. Avoidance of conflict with
neighboring street intersection
except as required by General: flan-
b Special consideration for resi
dential privacy and pedestrian
safety (case of cul-de-sacs ,
3-way intersections and similar
amenities ) .
C . Two or more access roads for
public safety service-.
4 Landscaping Maximum 1.0
a_., Preservation of existing 0-3
ornamental ental trees and basic
land-form.
b,. Amount , quality , size and variety ] -7
of landscaping and screening,,
including screening of undesirable
features . Not lens than .five 15-
gallon trees per unit are required
for minimum credit ; unusually
abundant and mature planting and
screening is required .for maximum
credit
C . Covenants ,; conditions and rstric-
tions establishing a homeowners ''
association with full responsibility
for bath on- and off-site main-
tenance have been dratted and
submitted to the City , and will b :
imposed as a condition of sale.
5 . Open Space Maximum
a . Amount of private common open -3
space ;..
b'. Extent of private recreation 0-2
facilities .
6 . Preservation of Agriculture Maximum 1
a. Project has not required removal 5
of land .from an agricultural
preserve within one year prior
to application.
b Project did not require the
rezoning of land zoned for
agriculture within one year
prior to application._
c Project will not be located imine 5
diately adjacent to an agricul-
tural preserve.
d. Project will be located in imme- -
diate vicinity of land under
Williamson Act contract;.
7 . Preservation of Cultural and Maximum
Historical resources
a Preservation of historically 2/feature
significant resources , includ-
ing buildings , walls , cutstone
curbing or landscaping.
b-. Project does not adversely 2
impact character or setting of;
any historical or cultural
resource in close proximity to
or within the project .
The recommendation of the City Historic
and Scenic Preservation Commission shall
be a prerequisite to a point award hereunder.
10
x tL`
E. LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING : Maximum 15
1.; To implement Proposition "R, " this
Council finds that provision of approxi-
mately 10 low and moderate income
housing within new residential devel-
opments is in the public interest:.
Therefore
a:. Project with dwelling unit (s) 2/unit
provided for low income per-
sons at correlative prices as
established by the United States
Department of Housing and Urban
Development .
b . Project with dwelling unit (s) 1/unit
provided for moderate income
persons at correlative prices as
established by the Unites States
Department of Housing and Urban
Development;.
2. In order to qualify for points under
this subsection, the project developer
shall file a detailed written statement
indicating the proposed method of pro-
vision, and shall be prepared to con-
tract with the City assuring same . In
addition, the favorable recommendation
of; the City Housing Commission shall
be- a. prerequisite to the award of any
points hereunder.
Low Income 2/unit
Moderate Income 1/unit
SECTION Ill - PROCEDURE FOR DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION
A. PREREQUISITES AND ENTITIES ASSIGNING POINTS
1. . Tentative Approval Required
In order to assure: that a project is
in final approval farm as required by
Proposition "R, " the project shall be
environmentally assessed and tenta-
tively approved by the Planning; Com-
mission and City Council before an
application for development alloca-
tions
lly ca-tions can be filed.
140 ` $'
2 . Point Assignments
The Planning Commission will assign:
paints in the following categories :
Consistency with Zone Classifications
and Standards
Architectural Design Variety
Site and Grading Design
Circulation
Landscaping
Open Space
3. The City staff will assign points in
the following categories :
Relationship to Public Services
Preservation of Agriculture
Preservation
Preservation of Cultural and
Historical Resources
Low and Moderate Income Housing
4 # The Redlands Unified School District
("District'" ) will assign points in the
Schools category .
B . APPLICATION
Following environmental review and tentative approval
of the project by the City , the applicant shall submit an
application for development allocations on fors provided by
the Manning Department..,
Applications do not require the preparation of final
engineering or construction plans in order to be considered;
however, all required information must be of sufficient detail;
to clearly illustratethe proposal :
Incomplete or partial applications will not be
accepted. Only one application is allowed per allocation
period on the same property,. In order for the City to review
projects as :fairly as possible , the written statement must
describe how the proposed project meets the criteria of
Section II . The written statement is important since the
developer will have no further opportunity to explain how the
development in question meets; the criteria of this ordinance .
C FILING AND ALLOCATION DATES
Semiannual allocations for 225 units will be made on
or before July 30 and December 30 yearly . Therefore , the
closing dates for application filings will be May 15 and
-12-
A1112%
QW
October 15 . However, notwithstanding the above , in 1984 the
closing dates will be June 15 and October 1.5 , and allocations'
will be made on or before August 30 and December 30 . Prior to
the closing date , plans and written material submitted .as part
of an application are not open for public review, however,,
after the closing date has passed, all material that has been
submitted as part of an application is open for public review.
D REVIEW
When an app-lication has been determined to be com-
plete and timely filed, it shall proceed to staff , Planning
Commission and District review. Once submitted for alloca-
tion, a project may not be altered. The planning staff will
meet with representatives of the various City departments and
appropriate Commissions to review each project; and .assign
numerical values based on the criteria in Section II .
Following the review period, the planning staff'
shall issue an evaluation of all projects requesting devel-
opment allocations numerical values assigned to each. The
report assigning numerical values to each project shall be
open for public review prior to the actual allocation awards
by the City Council .
E. ALLOCATION
At a public meeting, the City Council shall evaluate
all recommended point assignments , hear from the applicant and
the general public if requested, and award the development
allocations pursuant to this ordinance . Projects receiving 75
points will be considered for awards , with higher priority
being given to projects with higher point values . A maximum
of 35 development< allocations may be awarded to any project in
any single allocation period, unless this limit and the total
successful applications result in less than 325 development
allocations being awarded. If the latter occurs , the excess
allocations will be prorated among successful projects applying
for more than 35 allocations on the basis of the relative
number applied for measured against the number remaining.
The decision of the City Council on development
allocation awards is final :
F. TIES
Should more than one project receive the same passing
point score hereunder, but insufficient development allocations ,
are available to provide both projects with their requested'
totals , each project will receive an equitably prorated share
of the remaining allocations based., on initial applications .
- 13-
mg
mg
G. ALTERATION OF APPROVED PROJECTS
The Council. may set guidelines by resolution to alloy
the alteration of a project in any manner which would not have
resulted: in the assignment of fewer points if the alteration
had been incorporated into the Marginal approved application.
Such a review of altered approved projects shall be
based upon the ordinance in effect: at the time of the original,
point allocation for Said project..
H. TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATIONS
A development allocation is awarded hereunder based
upon the particular location and characteristics of a specific
development proposal can a specific site , and may not therefore
e transferred to another site or used for another development
proposal . However , a development allocation may be transferred
with City Council approval to successors in interest who acquire
title to the specific development proposal on the specified site,
upon proof satisfactory to the City Attorney that legal title
has so passed.<
I . EXPIRATION
A development allocation expires and is of no further
effect when the underlying tentative map or use permit expires .
This paragraph applies only to Residential Development Allocations
awarded after May 15, 1984
J. OUTSIDE WATER AND SEWER CONNECTIONS
The City Council shall implement Section 6 of Proposition
"R" by allotting up to 150 water and sewer connections per year
within the unincorporated area, covered by the City ' s sphere of
influence and based on the recommendations of the County of San
Bernardino. However, no allotments shall be made to projects
which conflict with the intent of Proposition "R" or the General
Plan as interpreted by the City Council .
SECTION IV - EMERGENCY SITUATIONS OR IMPACTION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES
OR SERVICES
No further- development approvals of any find or sewer
or water connections shall be ;approved by the City when an
emergency situation or impaction of public facilities or
services has been identified by the appropriate agency. Such
conditions shall be any one or more of the following
-1 -
1 . Notification of a City department , other public agency,
or the District that its ability to meet; the public needs
is impacted. Such notice shall be presented to the City
Council in writing, and be followed with a presentation
by the impacted agency to the. City Council in public
sessions to provide detailed, clear and convincing evi-
dence of an emergency or impaction. In the event of
notification by the District., the requirements of
Ordinance No . 1740 shall apply in addition to the above .
2 . Before the close of filing for an allocation period,
purveyors of City and School services shall notify the
City Manager if their particular service would be impacted
by the award of development allocations to the applica-
tions to be considered that period . If emergency or
impaction is declared and concurred with by the City
Council , no development allocation shall be approved,
without attaching a requirement that no building permit
shall be issued until documentation has been received
from the declaring agency that such impaction has been
adequately Litigated.. This requirement shall remain in
force until the declaration of emergency or impaction is
rescinded by the declaring agency, or as otherwise deter-
mined by the City Council by resolution.
3 . Any other danger to the public safety or welfare which
the City Council determines to exist for the purpose of
this section.
If the dwelling unit(s) under consideration is/are outside
the City limits , any and all mitigating measures arising from,
declaration of emergency or impaction shall apply ifthe City
supplies water and/or sewer services , and if a water and/or
sewer emergency or impaction exists :
In the :event the City Council concurs that such emergency
or impaction exists , no further development approvals of any
kind and/or sewer or water connection permits shall be issued
except when approved by a majority of the City Council for
each applicant considered individually, after it has determined
that the specific project= will not contribute additionally to
the existing emergency or impaction situation, or upon notice
by the appropriate agency that the specific project has ade-
quately mitigated its additional impact .
SECTION V - FURTHERIDELI NE
1 . Preposition. "R" and this ordinance may be implemented by
resolution to farther the purposes set forth in Propos'i-
tion "P .
- 15-
1
1RS
® All lots created by the subdivision process , whether or
not initially subject to this ordinance;,; Ordinance
No . 1680 and subsequent amendments or related ordinances,
that are capable of being further subdivided under the
State dap Act and local ordinances existing at the time
of subdivision, shall have the final plat map stamped
with a nate stating that , "Any further subdivision will
be subject to the development allocation process under
the provisions of Proposition 3"R` as implemented by City
ordinance . "
SECTIO VI - SEVERANCE
If any section-, sentence , clause or phrase of this ordi-
nance
r i-nance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional ,
the remaining portions of the ordinance shall not be affected
thereby. This ordinance and each section, sentence , clause
and phrase hereof would have been prepared , proposed, adopted,
approved and ratified irrespective of the fact that any one o
more other sections , sentences , clauses or phrases could be
dec-l.ared invalid or unconstitutional ..
SECTION VII - REPEALS
Most of the: substance of this ordinance has already been;
enacted by the City in Ordinances 1680 , 1717 , 1742, 1748 ,
1788 , 1801 , 1818 and 1825 . The areas in which major substan-
tive changes are here made are agricultural preservation,
design, relationship to public services , and in the time
limits for 1984 allocations . However, in order to allow
citizens , developers and City staff members to comprehend the
interrelationship of and comply with these requirements , it
appears better practice to compile them all in one place for
ease of reference . For this reason, this ordinance replaces
prior point system ordinances, and: Ordinances 1.788, 1801, 1818
and 1825 are hereby repealed,,
SECTION VIII - PUBLICATION
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this
ordinance and shall cause the same to be published once in the
Redlands Daily Facts , a newspaper of general circulation
printed and published in the City of Redlands .
Mayor of the City of Redlands
-1. -
i
, Lorrie Poyzer, City Clerk, City of Redlands, hereby certify
that the foregoing ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council
at a ,regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of may, 1984 ,
by the following vote:
AYES. Coun ilm mbers Johnson, DeMirjyn, Martinez , Larsen;
Mayor Beswick
NOES • None
ABSENT: None
Cffy lerk,
Ordinance o, 1843 -17-