HomeMy WebLinkAbout4580_CCv0001.pdf If�'�dll
RESOLUTION NO. 4580
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLAND
APPROVING ANNEXATION NO. 70 TO THE CITY OF REDLANDS
(LAFCO NO. 2545)
WHEREAS, the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of
San Bernardino adopted its Resolution No. 2224 on September 20, 1989 ,
massing determinations and approving the proposed annexation of
approximately 270 acres generally located east of Alessandro load,
south of existing City boundaries and generally north of San Timoteo
Creels to the City of Redlands territory described in Exhibit A
attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing by this City Council was held upon
the date and at the time and place specified in said notice of public
hearing and in orders or orderscontinuingsuch hearing, and
WHEREAS, at such hearing, this City Council ;heard and received
all oral and written protests; the City Council considered all plans
and proposed changes of organization and reorganization, objections
and evidence which were made, presented, or filed, it received
evidence as to whether the territory is inhabited and uninhabited,
improved or unimproved; and all persons present were given an
opportunity to hear and be heard in respect to any matter relating to
said application, in evidence presented at the hearing,
WHEREAS, the terms and conditions of annexation as approved by
the Local Agency Formation Commission are as follows
1:. The conducting authority for this proceeding shall be the
City Council of the City of Redlands,-
2.
edlands,2. The boundaries are approved as set forth in Exhibit A
attached hereto,-
3.
ereto,3. The following distinctive short form designation shall be
used throughout this proceeding: LAFCO 2545f-
4.
545;4. County Service Area 38 and County Service Area 70 shall be
detached without split of assets or liabilities,
5. The date of issuance of the Certificate of Completion shall
e the effective elate of this annexation, and
WHEREAS, the reasons for this annexation are: The annexation of
the hereinbefore described territory will contribute to the orderly
growth of the City of Redlands, provide the proper control of street
layout, drainage, sanitary sewer design, and insure the proper use of }
{
land in conformity with the overall plan of the City of Redlands, and ,.
WHEREAS, the regular county assessment roll is utilized by the
City of Redlands t and
�f�
WHEREAS, the regular county assessment roll is utilized by the
City of Redlands; and
WHEREAS, the affected territory will be taxed for existing
general bonded indebtedness of the City of Redlands,- and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Redlands hereby orders the territory described in the attached
Exhibit A, annexed, pursuant to the Cortese/Knox Local Government
Reorganization Act (Government Code Section 56000) , and directs the
City Clerk of the City of Redlands to transmit four certified copies
of this resolution with applicable fees required by Section 54902.5
of the Government Code to the Executive Officer of the Local Agency
Formation Commission of San Bernardino County and an Environmental
Impact Report was prepared on this project and at the time of
developmentr 133 mitigation measures shall be addressed and
applicable mitigation shall be complied with according to the
mitigation monitoring program described in Exhibit B attached hereto
and by this reference incorporated herein.
ADOPTED, SIGNED ANT) APPROVED this 7th day of November, 1989.
79'
5
Mayor of the City of Redlands
ATTEST:
7X
City C erk .
I, L6rrie Poyzerr City Clerk of the City of Redlands, hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at
a regular meeting thereof held on the 7th day of November, 1989, by
the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Wormser, DeMirjyn, Cunningham, Larson;
Mayor Beswick
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAINED; None
City rk, Cit�
CUe eTiands
xpm
',A
exhibft A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR URBAN ENVIRONS
AREA TOB ANNEXED TOTHE CITY CSF REDLhNDS
That portion of Sections 10 and 11, Township 2 ,South, Range
'fest, SAN BERNARDINOMERIDIAN, described as follows.-
BEGINNING
ollowsEOI I O at the centerline intersection of Alessandro Road
and the North line of Section 10, the North ;line of Section
10 being the existing City Limit Line of the City o
Redlands t thence North 89' 211 4611 East along the Worth line
of said Section 1 , 1565.38 feet to the Northeast corner of
said Section ltd# Bence continuing along the North line of
Section 11-, South 890 43 ' 21" East 1929.04 feet to the
Northwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4
of the Northwest est 1/4 of said Section 11,, said point being an
angle point in the existing City Limit Line of the City of
Redlands * thence South 00* 291 2011 West: along the West limon
of said Northeast 1/4 4 of the Northeast I, 4 of the Northwest
1/4 of said Section 11, 661.49 feet to an angle paint in the
existing City Limit Line of the city of Redlands, thence
South 89" 391 1401 East 648.79 feet to an angle point in the
existing City Limit Line of the city of Redlands; thence
South 000 001 41" East- 662.,26 feet to an angle paint in the
existing City Limit Line of the City of' Redlands; thence
continuing; South 000
041 0311 East 1324.98 feet to the center
of said Section 11 thence continuing South 00• 021 1311 East
1297. 02 02 feet to the Southeast corner of e Northeast 1, 4 of
the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 11; thence North X39• 581
4411 West along the South line of said Northeast 1. 4 of the:
Southwest 1/4 of Section 11, 1323.37 feet to the Southwest
corner' of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section
11; thence Nor 00* 281 5111 West along the West line of said
Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11:, 130 9.48
feet to the Northwest corner of said Northeast 1, 4 of the
Southwest 1/4 of Section lit thence North ' 261 4511 West
1333 .59 feet to the West 1, 4 corner of said Section II
thence Sou 00* 551 0011 East along the East line of said
Section 10, 104.13 feett* thence North 300 271 31" West 319.68
feet#- thence North 82* 201 31" West 458.+43 feet thenceNorth
df`0 13t 31" test 688.90 feet# thence Nor 62* 091 31" West
381.65 feet, thence Worth 49' 1:11 31" West 436.34 feet to an
intersection with the centerline of Alessandro Road,- as said
centerline is shown by Record of Survey recorded in: Bock 32
of Surveys,, Rage u4 , records of San Bernardino County** thence:
North 35' 21 5611 Last along said centerline of Alessandro
Road, 18 .87 feet to a tangent curve, said curve being concave
to the fest and having a radius of 19`1- feet; thence
curving to the left through a central angle of 46' 1 00, a
arc distance of 154 . 23 feet thence forth 1 " 55' 0411 West
along the centerline of said Alessandro Road, 114 .00 feet to
a tangent curve conclave to the East and having a radius o
286. 50 deet; thence curving to the right through a central
angle of 26 12 ' 4411 , an: arc distance of 131. 07 feet;. thence
North 15* 1V 4011 East along the centerline of said
Alessandro Road, 378 .33 feet to an angle point therein,
thence North 26* 54 ' 3711 East 197 .86 feet to an angle point
therein; thence North 11' 541 2811 East 179.87 feet to an
angle point therein t- thence North. 35* 061 521' East 114 . 85
feet to an angle point therein; thence North 001 341 3911 West
235.57 feet to an angle )point. thereint, thence North 18 ' 34 "
221': meet 0. 30 feet to the point of beginning.
CONTAINING 273.04 ages, more or less,.
Pre' area by: AL R
oSal
Harold Rrtic Exp. juns 30, 1992
L. S. No. 2851
February 28, 1589
RESOLUTION NO. 4580
EXHIBIT B
SUNSET HILLS SPECIFIC PLAN
SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 43
CITY OF REDLANDS
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
Prepared for ..
CITY OF REDLANDS
Community Development Department
(714) 798-7555
Prepared by:
URBAN ENVIRONS
300 E. State Street
Redlands, CA 92373
( 724 ) 798-4446
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION1 INTRODUCTION > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .
A. Introduction . . . „ . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l
B. Mitigation M nitcrin S stem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
SECTION II . MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
A. ,sails . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
C. Hydrology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DBiology Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
E. Climate and Air Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,
F. Traffic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
C. _ Cultural Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
H. Noise . . . <. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I . Visual Resources . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .:1
J. Schools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
13
K. Pars and Recreation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
L. Law Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
N. Fire Protection . . .-. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . '14
N. Solid taste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IS
O. Water SuR21Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l9
P. Wastewater Management . . . , .. . . . 1
Q. Energy., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
20
APPENDIX A. SOUTHEAST GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT MITIGATION
MEASURE'
APPENDIX B. MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST
SECTION 1. INTRODUCTJON
A. Introduction
The intent of this "Mitigation Monitoring Report" is to
comply with the City of Redlands implementation of AB 3180 ..
This law became effective on January 1, 1983, and has added
a 'major step to the CEQA process;. In brief, it requires all
state and local agencies to establish reporting or
monitoring programs for projects approved by a public agency
whenever approval involves the adoption of either a
"mitigated negative declaration" or specified environmental
findings related to "environmental impact reports= "
As drafted, AB 3180 simply calls for a reporting or
monitoring program "designed to ensure compliance during;
project implementation* " Thus, public agencies are given
broad latitude in developing programs to meet the variety of
projects and circumstances affectingtheir Jurisdictions
The City of Redlands has required the project proponent for
;specific Plan No. 43 to design and prepare a Mitigation
Monitoring Program for the Specific Plan. Thus, the
following report has been prepared to comply with AB 3180 as
implemented by the City of Redlands
page
B. Mitigation Monitoring ,SystgLn,
The City of Redlands leaves the task of designing a
reporting or monitoring program to individual project
sponsors or proponent. Naturally, a program's complexity
will vary depending upon the project being approved and the
environmental effects being mitigated. In order to
comprehensively handle all the mitigation measures
recommended for Specific Plan No. 43, a specially tailored
program has- been developed for each mitigation measure.
This monitoring program distinguishes between various types
of mitigation measures . These types include :
1 . Mitigation measures that must be satisfied through
project design. (PD)
2. Mitigation measures that must be satisfied prior to
Tentative Tract and/or Conditional Use Permit
approval . (TT/CUP)
3 . Measures that must be satisfied during the
improvement plan check process. (IPC)
4 . Mitigation measures that must be satisfied during
the house plan check process. .(HPC)
5 . Mitigation measures that must be satisfied during
the grading plan check process. (GPC)
6 . Mitigation measures that must be satisfied prior to
permit Issuance. (PI )
7 . Mitigation measures that must be satisfied during
project construction. (CONSTR)
8 . Mitigation measures that must be satisfied after
project development or post-occupancy. (PO)
In addition to identifying when a particular mitigation
measure is to occur, it is also important to recognize who
is responsible for carrying out the mitigation measure . In
some cases a mitigation measure will show up on subsequent
improvement drawings, some mitigation measures will be
complied with during construction activities, and some
mitigation measures will be conducted by the City after
occupancy of dwelling units. Therefore, the following
system has been developed to identify those responsible for
carrying out the individual mitigation measures .
page 2
1 . Mitigation measures that must be satisfied by
individual consultants, including engineers,
planners, architects, soils consultants, etc. ( 1)
2 . Mitigation measures that must be satisfied by
developers during construction. ( 2)
3 . Mitigation measures that must be satisfied by
individual home builders/home owners. ( 3)
4 . Mitigation measures that must be satisfied by
various City departments, including the following:
a. Community Development Department ( 4-CD)
b. Building and Safety Department ( 4-BS)
C. Engineering Services (4-ES)
d. Municipal Utilities (4-MU)
e . Community Services Department (4-CS)
f. Fire Department (4-FD)
g. Police Department (4-PD)
Each of the above types of mitigation monitoring has
been applied to the adopted mitigation measures for Specific
Plan No. 43, and contained in SECTION II . of this Mitigation
Monitoring Program. Also, a complete copy of the Southeast
General Plan Amendment Environmental Impact Report
Mitigation Measures is contained in Appendix A. Each of
these mitigation measures has also been codified with the
above system. Where the mitigation measures are repeated in
the Sunset Hills mitigation measure, it is so indicated.
Finally, where mitigation measures contained in the Plan
Amendment are not applicable to the Sunset Hills Specific
Plan, it has been indicated by (N/A) .
A checklist has been developed to be utilized for
further processing during the various phases of project
design, approval and construction. The standard checklist is
contained in Appendix B. The checklist will be utilized for
record keeping and for systematically observing mitigation
activities. The checklist will not only be utilized by the
project proponent during the various phases of plan
processing, permitting and construction, but also by future
home builders and home owners as a way to show compliance
for those mitigation measures tailored to home occupancy and
long-term maintenance . As a result, this checklist will be
provided for the City of Redlands Building and Safety
Department to be handed out as part of the future home
building plan check process within the Specific Plan
boundaries .
page 3
SECTION II, MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
A . Soils
The following recommendations and mitigation measures have
been identified:
1 . Future soils investigations should be
performed to develop specific soil and
foundation recommendations for each phase ,
Future investigations may utilize test borings
and/or test trenches for field exploration,
depending on details of the proposed
structures and extent of site grading. In the
course of future investigations, additional
borings should be placed within the alluvial
drainages to determine the extent of the
settlement potential of these soils. (IPC) !)
2 . All areas to be graded should be stripped of
significant vegetation and other deleterious
materials . These materials should be removed
from the site for disposal . Existing
irrigation lines should be traced, removed and
capped at the property lines. Irrigation
lines may be spread throughout the fill after
being crushed, as approved by the soils
engineer . (CONSTR) (2)
3. All existing uncontrolled fills should be
completely removed, cleaned of significant
deleterious materials and may be reused as
compacted fill . (CONSTR) (2)
4. Cavities created by removal of subsurface
obstructions, such as structures, individual
effluent disposal systems, and trees, and by
the exploratory trenches, should be thoroughly
cleaned of loose soil, organic materials and
other deleterious materials, shaped to provide
access for construction equipment, and
backfilled as recommended for site fill .
(CONS R) { 2")
page 4
5. Prior to placing fill, the surfaces of all
areas to receive fill should be scarified to a
depth of at least 12 inches. The scarified
soils should be brought to near optimum
moisture content and recompacted to a relative
compaction of at least 90 percent (ASTM D 1557-
7(l ) . ( Citi STR) ( 2)
6 . Unless approved by the soils engineer, rock or
similar irreducible material with a maximum
dimension greater than eight inches should not
be buried or placed in fills . Import fill
should be inorganic, granular soils free from
rocks or lumps greater than eight inches in
maximum dimension. Sources for import fill
should be approved by the soils engineer prior
to their use . Fill should be spread in eight
inch or less lifts, each lift brought to near
optimum moisture contnet, and compacted to a
relative compaction of at least 90 percent
(ASTM D 1557-70 ) . (CONSTR) ( 2)
7. Fill slopes should be constructed no steeper
than two horizontal to one vertical . Fill
slopes should be overfilled during
construction and then cut back to expose fully
compacted soil . A suitable alternative would
be to compact the slopes during construction
and then roll the final slopes to provide
dense, erosion-resistant surfaces . Where
f'ills± are to be placed against existing slopes
steeper than five horizontal to one vertical,
the existing slopes should be benched into
competent native materials to provide a series
of level beaches to seat the fill and to
remove the compressive and permeable topsoils .
(CONSTR) (2)
8 . All graded slopes shall be revegetated as soon
as possible after development. A revegetation
plan shall be submitted with all proposed
grading plans that affect areas over ten
percent slopes and this plan shall include
native species in the design to the degree
feasible ( for example, consistent with fire
safety) , schedules for revegetation,
accountability for long term maintenance of
landscaped areas, and performance bonds to
ensure that revegetation can be undertaken.
(CONSTR) (1&2)
page 5
The use of succulent ground covers such as
ieplants or sedum is not recommended .
Irrigation systems should be monitored to
assure proper operation of the water system
and to prevent overwatering. Measures should
be provided to prevent surface water from
flawing over slope faces. (COMSTR) (2)
g. Additional evaluation of soils for expansion
potential should be conducted during future
investigation and/or the grading operation.
IPG) 1)
10. Utilizing a compacted fill mat or direct
embedment of footings into dense undisturbed
soils, the proposed residential and equestrian
center structures may be safely founded on
conventional spread foundations, either
individual spread footings and/or continuous
wall footings . Footings should be a minimus
of 12inches wide, and should be established
at a minimum depth of 12 inches below adjacent
final grade level: . Allowable bearing
pressures and lateral pressures should be
determined based on the results of
supplemental geotechnical investigation data.
Footings should be set hack from all natural
steep slopes in accordance with
recommendations contained in the Preliminary
Engineering Geology Investigation report
prepared for the site. Footings should be set
back from all constructed slopes in accordance
with the recommendations shown on Enclosure
"KII of the soils report. (HPG)'(2&3)
B. Geology
The following geologic mitigation measures shall apply:
1 . A Richter magnitude 7 . 0 earthquake is expected
along the San Jacinto fault, which is located
approximately 1 3/4 miles southwest of the
site; therefore, human occupancy structures
shall, be designed accordingly. (FHP ) (1
2. Positive drainage of the site shall be
provided and water shall not be allowed to
pond behind or flow over any cut or fill
slopes. (Ct)F STS) (2&3)
page 6
k
3 . All proposed, significant cut slopes shall be
evaluated for stability prior to grading, and
subsurface data shall be obtained if a
potential stability problem exists as
determined by the engineering geologist, For
general planning purposes, the maximum
inclination of all cut slopes should be 2: 1
(horizontal to vertical ) up to a maximum
height of 30 feet. (PIM)
4 . If development is proposed on or in the
immediate vicinity of suspected landslides,
the landslides shall be evaluated in greater
detail by the engineering geologist prior to
grading. If mass grading is proposed in the
immediate vicinity of landslides, the grading
plans shall be reviewed to ensure that the
landslides will be removed or buttressed by
fill . (PIM)
5 . A minimum setback for human occupancy
structures from the top of natural steep
slopes shall be a horizontal distance of at
least 15 feet or the horizontal distance
calculated by extending a 2: 1 (horizontal to
vertical ) plane, extending upward from the toe
of the steep slope, whichever is greater. For
planning purposes, structures to be placed at
the base of steep slopes shall be set back
from the toe of the slopes at least a
horizontal distance equal to 1/2 the slope
height or a maximum distance of 15 feet. Each
slope and setback shall be individually
evaluated during review of the grading plan.
(IPC) (HPC) ( 1&4-BS)
6 . Human occupancy structures placed at the base
of slopes shall not be placed below colluvial
filled slope swales unless the swales are
cleaned of unstable materials and/or debris
retention or deflection measures are
implemented. (CONSTR) (2)
7. All cut slopes greater than 15 feet in height
shall be provided with a concrete-lined "V"
ditch above the top of the cut slope to
protect the slope from erosion. All cut
slopes 30 feet or greater In height shall have
terraces in accordance with the Uniform
Building Code . (CONSTR) (IPC) t1&4-BS)
Papp 7
-. If individualsewage disposal systems are
used, seepage pits shall be utilized in the
areas of moderate to high topographic relief;.:
The location and depth of seepage pits in
areas of potential slope instability shall be
evaluated by the engineering geologist. (PI) ( 1)
9 . The final grading plan for the site shall be
reviewed and approved by ars engineering
geologist prior to any grading. (IPC, HPC) (1&4-SS)
10 . Grading of the site shall be evaluated by the-
engineering geologist by in-grading
inspections to be sure that no hazards, not
visible on the surface, are uncovered that
could endangerthe proposed development of the
site. ( QNSTR') t13
C Hydrology
The following hydrology mitigation measures shall be
implemented in the design and construction of drainage
improvements within the project site.
1 . They text of the Plan .Amendment strongly recommends
that a Specific Plan be prepared for each Planning
Sector. Thus, either as part of a Specific Placa or
as each Sector is developed, a comprehensive storm
runoff management plan shall be prepared. Such
management plans shall adhere to the text of the
Plan Amendment; to the degree feasible . statural
drainage channels shall be incorporated into
Perimeter Fuel Modification/Access Area designs,.
These- channels shall be designed to incorporate
sufficient area to convey post development flows
with no hazards to structures or persons. They
shall also include appropriate nature and non-
native, drought resistant vegetation, consistent
with fire protection requirements .. This will maize
use of the inherent ability of 'natural drainage
courses to filter sediments and: take up nutrients .
The City of Redlands shall review and approve such
plans prior to permitting development within a
Planning Sector . 1PDl l l
Y
5
{5
{
page 8
sryY
s2
. Detention/retention and/car desilting basins shall
be incorporated In the design of the water courses
created to handle storm runoff by the management
plans-. Such basi
prepare a fire management plan for the open
space created by Specific Plans. This plan
shall detail the areas where fuel modification
is necessary, where fire-resistant vegetation
should be planted, emergency access for fire-
fighting equipment, and a program of
prescribed burns . Fire suppression in the
wildlands is undesirable in the long term due
to the increased chances for an uncontrolled
wildland fire that can have catastrophic
results , (IPC) ( 2&4-FD)
E. Climate and Air Quality
The following air quality mitigation measures were adopted :
1 . The developer and the City shall explore the
feasibility of providing park and ride lots and
encouraging car pooling of residents within the
project area , (PO) (4-ES)
2 . The City shall consult with Omnitrans
regarding the possibility of extending a
transit route to the project boundaries. If
this can be accomplished, each specific plan
shall be required to provide a transit stop
with facility improvements such as shelters,
benches and a bus pocket for easy ingress and
egress . (PO) (4-ES)
3 . The following mitigation measures are
abstracted from the District Handbook and
relate to short-term construction emissions :
a. Fuq1tive dust shall be controlled by
regular water spraying during construction
activity, and grading shall cease at high wind
conditions t mph) .
b. Contracts with construction companies
shall require that all equipment engines
be maintained in proper tune to minimize
emissions, including timing retard.
C. The contract with the construction company
shall require that construction be
discontinued during first and second stage
smog alerts as forecasted by the District.
d. Truck wheel washers shall be installed at
construction site entrance5, construction site
access roads shall be paved, and roads shall be
page 10
cleaned from construction related soil
deposits . Pave, curb, or place vegetation in
unpaved road shoulders . A storm drain water
control system shall be developed to limit soil
erosion, including the rapid clean up of street
debris after major storms . (CONSTR) (2)
F. Traffic
The following mitigation measures are required for the
Sunset Hills Specific Plan:
1 . The intersection of Alessandro Road/Sunset Drive
shall be realigned and regraded to provide adequate
sight distance on all approaches. The vegetation
in the northwest quadrant (Hillside Cemetary) and
northeast quadrant should be trimmed to improve
sight distance . This shall occur in conjunction
with the Phase 1 improvements . (CONSTR) (2)
2 . The intersection of Alessandro Road/Crescent Avenue
shall be restriped for northbound approaches to
allow a left and right turn lane . In addition,
vegetation in the southeast quadrant should be
trimmed to improve sight distance. This shall
occur in conjunction with Phase 1 improvements .
(CONSTR) ( 2)
3. Realignment and recontouring of Alessandro Road
from Sunset Drive to San Timoteo Creek shall be
required in conjunction with improvement plans for
individual phases of development within the Sunset
Hills Specific Plan. In addition, Alessandro Road
shall be provided with left turn bays for traffic
entering the project site. (IPC) (2)
4 . The City shall continue to coordinate with San
Bernardino and Riverside Counties if cumulative
traffic increases on San Timoteo Canyon Road
require the upgrading of the roadway into a multi-
lane facility. (PO) (4-ES)
5 . The bridge along Alessandro Road at the San Timoteo
Creek shall be widened and/or relocated to allow
improved traffic flow. Consideration shall be
given to establishing an assessment district or
reimbursement program for this improvement at the
first phase of development, (IPC) ( 2)
G. Cultural Resources
page 11
G. Cultural Resources
The following mitigation measures for cultural resources are
recommended:
1 . Review of the subject site will be carried out by
by the ARCRAEOLOGICAL INFORMATION CENTER of the San
Bernardino County Museum and all recommendations
resulting from that review will be carried out .
(TT/CUP) ( 1 )
i
page 11a
F
2 . The subject site shall be monitored for
artifact deposits and possible features during
initial stages of land alteration, If
cultural materials are found in the course of
this monitoring, then construction will be
halted in the sensitive area in order to
properly assess the significance of the
materials . (CONSTR) ( 1)
3. While the cemetery is not scheduled ' for any
construction activity, additional work shall
be performed during Phase I of Neighborhood 3
to identify the cemetery . At present it is not
known whether it is even listed with the California
Cemetery Board. (CONSTR) ( 1 )
4 . If human bones are encountered, then the San
Bernardino County Coronerls: office must be
contacted and all work halted until a
clearance is given by that office and any
other involved agencies, including Native
Americans, if necessary. (CONSTR) ( 2)
H. Noise
The following mitigation measures are required:
1 . Prior to issuance of building permits, the
project(s ) will present an acoustical study by a
recognized acoustical engineer showing compliance
with an exterior level of 60 CL and an interior
level of 45 CBL, Additionally, railroad noise
levels shall not exceed 55 dBA on the interior
based on the average of the highest one-third
events. (PI) ( l&4-B5)
2 , All future construction activities within the
project ares shall be restricted to normal working
hours (7 a . m. to 6 p. m. ) and all construction
equipment shall be required in the construction
contract to maintain sound muffling and fire
suppression systems that comply with state and
local regulations , (CONSTR) ( 2)
page 12
Visual Resources
The following mitigation measures have been required for
visual resources .
1. Entrances to canyons to screen development from
views on adjacent roads by effective use of
landscaping and berrying. (PD) ( 1)
2 . Landscaping plans shall be prepared for each
planning sector and these plans shall identify
the various mechanisms that will be used to
screen development from views. (TTlCUP) ( 1 )
. Any roads extended up to Sunset Drive shall
stay cuff ridgelines and shall minimize gradin
to the maximum degree passible . Graded areas
shall be given high intensity remedial
treatment to eliminate or mitigate scarring as
rapidly as possible. (PD) (1&2)
J Schools
The following school m tigation measure is required:
1 . School fees pursuant to applicable state/local laws
shall be due and payable prior to issuance of
building permits .. (PZ) (2&3)
K. parks and Recreation
The following; mitigation measure is required.
1. Appropriate parks and recreation fees shall:
be paid at the time of future building
permit issuance . (PY) (2&3);
. An equestrian facility management plan shall be
prepared to identify the facilities that will be
maintained, the projected operating budget and the
necessary revenue source. (TT/CUP) 41)
3. A Trails Plan shall be .prepared to include proposed
trail linkages to adjacent properties and existing
regional trail systems, trail ,standards and maintenance
program. (TT/CUP) (l)
{
page 1
a�
L.. Law Enforcement,
The following mitigation measures are required:
I. The hones shall be designed to include crime
deterrence hardware such as deadbol;ts and
peepholes. (HPC) ( 1 4-B )
. Signage shall clearly indicate the number of each
unit, and signs shall be available that clearly
direct emergency vehicles to specific portions of
the development. (CONSTR, PO) ('3)
3. A map showing how the units are numbered shall be
provided to the Police Department,
(CON TR) ( &4-Ptd)
4 Entryways shall be visible from the street s+
passersby and policemen on patrol can see an
intruder attempting to open the door . (HP ) (1&4-t3 )
Windows shall not be obscured by heavy shrubbery
that: will provide a screen for an intruder,
(PO) (3)
. Future homeowners associations or residential
areas shall coordinate organization of a
neighborhood watch program with the Redlands
Police department. (PO) t 3&4-Pt1
7 . Walkways, entryways and common traffic areas
shall be lighted with low glare, high intensity,
and energy efficient lighting. (CON TR) { 3)'
. The configuration of units, landscaping, and
pathways shall be designed to avoid danger spots of
low visibility where criminal activity can take
place. (PD) (3)
g. The City shall consider implementing an assessment
district to support future increased Police
Department manpower requirements, alternatively,
the City shall increase funding from general funds
to maintain the current high level of service.
(TT1 P) (4-CD) ( -Ptl)
M� Fire Protection
The following mitigation measures shall be implemented
throughout the Specific Plan area.
I. At bast two ( ) different publicly dedicated
ingress and egress routes shall be provided for
all planning areas and development projects
pursuant to NEPA 3 . 103 . (PD) ( 2)
Sage 1 r
2. A minimum of 26 feet of pavement with parking an
one side of the street shall be provided for
each access. (TT/CUP) (1)
3 . No cul -de-sac shall be longer than 350 feet,
except in PRD type developments where cul-de-
sacs up to approximately 600 feet can be allowed
with the approval of the Redlands Fire Department.
(TT/CUP, PD) ( 1&4-FD)
4. No dead end street will be allowed to be
constructed, temporary cul-de-sacs shall be
required. (CONSTR) (2)
5. No street shall exceed 14% slope, and all
streets shall be paved in all weather, non-skid
surfaces. (IPC) ( 2)
6. Driveways shall not exceed 150 feet in length
or 14% grade, unless specifically approved by the
Fire Department and alternative fire mitigation
measures are implemented. (IPC) (2&4-FD)
7 . Perimeter streets shall be placed on the
foothill side of development. (PD) (1)
8 . Non-combustible and reflective street and
building markers shall be required to identify
all streets and buildings. (CONSTR) ( 2&3)
9 . Vegetation shall be removed 10 feet from all
roads and thinned for an additional 100' feet.
(CONSTR) (2)
10. Subdivisions are to be provided with 8 inch or
larger circulating ( loop) water mains and
storage capacity sufficient to provide the
minimum fire flow duration and hydrant spacing
under "system standards" indicated below with a
residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch.
(IPC) ( )
11. A minimum of 2 private spigots will be provided
facing the foothills at each structure. (HPC) (3)
12. Each fire hydrant shall be identified with approved
blue reflecting markers. (CONSTR) (2)
page 15
13. Each cul-de-sac greater than 300 feet in length
requires a minimum; of l hydrant. (IPC) ( 2)
14 . Fire flow gpm, duration and hydrant spacing shall
be provided according to the City of Redlands
minimum standards . (IPCw) 2`)
15. All utilities shall be underground. (IPC) ( 2)
16} Open ends of tile roofs rust be capped with non-
ignitable material to prevent bard nests or other
combustible materials from being located within the
roof structure_, (HPC) (-3)
17, Decking material shall be of at least 1 hour
fire resistant rating, (HPC) ( 3)
18 . No cave vents shall be allowed. (H C) (3)
19. Other vents shall be covered by 1/4 inch corrosion
resistant wire mesh, not to exceed 144 square
inches . (HPC) ( 3)
20, No combustible materials shall ,be allowed such
as patio covers with plastic, bamboo, straw or
fiberglass. (HPC) (3&4-BS)
21 . No cave vents shall be allowed facing the
natural open space_. (HPC) ( )
22 , Any exposed piping shall be non-combustible,
all other piping must be underground. (HPC) ( 3)
23. All accessory buildings, guest housing and
secondary housing shall also comply with fire
standards;. HPC) (
24. All exterior walls shah be 1 hour fire walls.
(HPC) (3&4-B a)
25. All roofing shall be TIBC" non-combustible and non-
wood roofing materials. (H ) (3 4-
26. Construction materials shall be UBC fire
resistant construction materials. Sidings
shall be noncombustible. (H ) (3)'
page 16
Y
f
2 . Chimney spark arrestors shall have a; 19 gauge
wire screen 3/8" to 1/ " openingmounted in a
vertical position visible from the ground. (HPC) ( 3)
28 . Structures supported to; any degree by stilts
shall have all underfloor areas encased to the
ground with the same fire retardant material a
required for fire walls . (HPC) (3)
29 , Any windows facing the natural open space shall
have double pained glass or extra strength
glass. (HPC) ( 3)
30 . Fencing shall be noncombustible and gates shall
be provided for access. (HPC) ( 3)
31., All property lines are to be placed at the tap
of the slope,. (T°T/CUP) ( 1)
32 . When buildable pads on natural slopes of less
than 30% are adjacent to slopes greater than
30%, the minimum pad set back shall be 3D feet
frau the edge of slope where the slope i
greater than 30 feet in height, unless the
entire slope is landscaped and fire resistant
vegetation is maintained by an irrigation
system,. (HPC) (3)
33, Install: and equip every swimming pool or
significant water sources such that the water
may be obtained quickly and easily for fire
fighting purposes. (HPC) ( 3)
34; Vegetation must be cleared 30 feet from
structure ( fire resistant ornamental and ground
cover irrigated plantings are allowed)
vegetation must be thinned or modified for 10
feet around structures. Ten foot clearances
gust be maintained from chimney or stove pipe
outlets. (May retain "specimen native shrubs"
if they are trimmed 2 feet above the ground,: do
not exceed approximately 7 feet in diameter,
are maintained free of all dead wood, duff, dry
leaves, etc. , and are not closer together than
18 feet of air space . )` (CONSTR) (3)
35 . Firewood must be stacked on a contour away from
all homes. (p(3) ( )
page 17
yi
36 . All fuel tans mint be greater than10feet
from all buildings with vegetation clearance.
( IPC) ( )
37. Require homeowners associations; or =assessment
districts to maintain the firebreak, fuel
modification zones ; (PO) ( 2)
38. The City shall inspect all homes on or around`
June 1 to insure compliance with the vegetation
clearance 'requirements: (PO) ( 4--FD)
39 , Provide re=sidential fire sprinklers within all
homespursuant to NFPA 13(d) . (HPC) ( 3)`
40 . The above measures and others as appropriate
shall be addressed in the specific plans that
will be prepared for each planning sector .
Final development designs shall be reviewed and
approved by the fire department. (PD) ( 1&4-FD)
40 . The City shall establish an assessment district
or other means to acquire a fire station site
as outlined in the discussion above. An
assessment district or other means should be
considered to support future increases)
Department manpower requirements; alternatively,
the City shall increase funding from general funds
to maintain the present manpower/population ratio.
(PO) (4-FD)
`xsl oriTaste
In order to mitigate potential solid waste impacts, the
following mitigation measures shall be implemented:
. The establishment of recycling centers and.
programs to reduce the amount of solid waste
materials which must be disposed of from the
project. The City can; impose a source
segregation program, a voluntary recycling
center, or a mandatory recycling center to>
accomplish mitigation of from 20% to QHS of the
existing waste stream. (PO) (4-CS)
1
i{
page 1
i
u
. Independentlypursue and obtain a permit to
expand the existing City operated landfill
facility within the life of the existing
facility: ( PQ) (4--CS)
3. Support Count * efforts to develop an acceptable
waste management scheme that will be affordable
and environmentally sound. (PO) (4-CS)
0. Water Supply
The following applicable mitigation measures are required:
1 . The City shall provide or identify a funding source
that will fund a study of the project area to
determine the best ( technically, environmentally,
and economically) alternative for providing water
to the project area. This shall include a detailed
look at existing water wells and perhaps include
the drilling and development of a well in order to
evaluate the ground water resource beneath the
project area (CdNSTR) ( -HU)
. Water conservation measures shall be outlined in
each planning sector specific plan, but shall
include a lint of drought resistant native and non-
native plants' that are acceptable for use within
that planning sector , (PD) ( 1)
P Wastewater Management,
The fallowing mitigation measures are required :
1 , The San Timoteo formation (Qts) soils generally
indicate 'percolation rates ranging from 2 . 1
gallons/sq, ft . /day (Q) to 6 . 1 gallons/sq. ft ; /day
(Q) . These rates indicate application rates on the
order of 20 to 50 square feet of seepage area per
100 gallons septic tans capacity. (HPC) (3)
2 . The Alluvium (Qal ) soils exhibited the most
conducive percolation rates for effluent disposal
systems . These rates generally ranged from 3 .
rallons/sq. ft /day to 5 , 3 gallons/sq. ft. /day, 3
Application rates within these soils would range
from 2€I to 35 square feet of seepage area per 100 7
gallons septic tank, capacity. (HPC) ( 3)
n
err
page l9 r
��t
9. The P'aleo of (Qps ) sails generally exhibited
the poorest percolation rues at the site .
Generally,; percolation rates within these limited
soil units were on the order of 0 . 67
gallons/sq. ft /day- to 1 . 48 gallons/sq. ft. /day.
Application rates within these soils would be
on the order of 70 to "90 square feet of seepage
area per 100 gallons of septic tank capacity.
( It is possible that these soils would exhibit
even poorer percolation characteristics than
encountered, and may .not meet requirements of
San Bernardino County Department of Environmental
Health. More site: specific percolation testing is
recommended for these areas if development is
proposed within these soil units . (HPC)(3)
. Based upon the wide range of percolation rates
obtained, effluent disposal systems should be
designed so as to maintain the minimum separation
between groundwater and the bottom of the seepage
pit system, per San Bernardino County Environmental
Health Services criteria. (HPC) t3
5 . Final system locations relative to structures and
other critical site features should be reviewed by
a qualified firm and the project engineering
geologist (HPC) (1 )
Energy
The following mitigation measures are recommended.
Electricity:
1 . Future projects developed under the proposed
Plan Amendment shall be evaluated for energy
conservation design, and for conformance with
the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66173 . 1 .
(TT/CUP) ( l&4-CD)
. All construction in the project area shall conform
with the most recent energy' conservation standards.
(HIPC) ( 3&4-BS)
3.. All units shall be made energy efficient by
incorporating as many of the following measures
as feasible: }�{
1) Solar water heating'/space heating systems. }
>k
page 20 'a
f
r��2
Installation of insulation throughout new
structures.
3) Design and orientation of the structures to
face in a north/south direction so as to
permit less heat gain in the summer.
4) Where ideal orientation of `structures is
not feasible, overhangs, external shading
on windows- and heat reflective glass on
the east and west exposures should be used
to moderate heat gain..
) Clear glass should be used in south facing
windows to permit maximum heat gain during
winter months.
6 ) Appropriate, well-placed landscaping and
reduced paged surfaces will help to
moderate temperatures near structures.
7) Fluorescent lighting should be used in
structures to the greatest degree feasible .
(HPC) ( 3)
Natural Gas}
1:. future projects developed under the proposed
Plan Amendment should be evaluated for energy
conservation design, and for conformance with
the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66473 . 1.
(TTICP) ( 1&4-C )
-. All construction should be required to conform
with the most recent energy conservation standards .
(HPC) ( 3&4-BB)
page 21
APPENDIX A
SOUTHEAST GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
MITIGATION MEASURES
V- SUMMARY OF
MMGATTON MEASURES
Should the propcased Plan Amendment be approved,
that the following soils mitigation measures be implemented:
1.
document recommends
I- till ,future development proposals d shall submit detailed sol
investigations as part of their applications. l
(A-t)
. Special attention in these reports shall b slo
stabilization and erosion control when Slopes exceed nten o percent
(10%). (TT/cup) (1 )
1. Mass grading shall not be allowed within the project area without
determination ,y the pity Council that such grading is consistent
with intent of the text of this Plan Amendment.
4. All graded slopes shall be reve etated as soon as passible after
development. A revegetation plait shall be submitted with all
propposed grading plansthat affect areas ten percent and this plan
shall include Mauve species in the de
si
example, consistent with fire safe to the deules gree fusible for
fg
accountability fear hang term maintena�nrcescofdlandscap ed reve
are anion,
Performance bonds to ensure that revegetation can be undertaken. A- and
Should the proposed Plan Amendment be implemented by the twits, this
document recommends the adaption of the following geology rtait anon
measures; g
5. All future developments within the project area shallrovide a
thorough geologic study. The measures identified withizz such srudv
for ensuring protection from geologic constraints shall be
implemented by the project applicant. (
PIAN)6.
All future developments within the project area shall provide grading
plans in accordance with City requirements. The measures identified
in such report for mitigating grading impacts shall be implemented,
including revegetation plans. (TT/CUP){1 l
7. Due to the high seismic shaking potential in the project area all
structures shall be designed to meet the seismic requirements for the
appropriate building code adapted by the City. (I )(384_BS)
8, If future investigations of the Banning
be considered active, the Ci shall. at Fault indicate that it should
ks
equivalent to those required for City
Priolo special studies minimum zoo$,.lish set/A-
Th
9. ti
s r�ang s b 21 a oat e Permittle un er th n dment in anv
areas with slopes reater than 15%, unless Policy Recommendations
are amended by the ity.
C'rrly( )
4
x
=fly
10. Lifeline infrastructure or critial emergency facilities shall not b
placed within geologic hazard zones .without the review and approval
of, an engineering geologist/soils engineer. Specific mitigation
measures shall be specified where such facilities mast be placed in:
geologic 'hazard areas to maximize their continued functioning, and
these measures shall be implemented, N/A-No ha2,ird 7.cries est ofl-sib
Based on the analysis provided in the detailed analysis section, this document
recommends the adoption of the following hydrology (water resource)
mitigation measures if the project is approved.
11. The text of the proposed Amendment strongly recommends that a
Specific Plan be prepared for each Plannin Sector; Thus, either
as part of a Spec c Plant. or as each lector is developed, a
comprehensive storm runoff management Ian shall be prepared,
Such management plans shall adhere to the text of the proposed,
Amendment to the degree feasible. Natural drainage channels shall
be incorporated into Perimeter Fuel Modificatlon/access Area
designs. These channels shall be designed to incorporate sufficient
area to convey post development flood flows with no hazards to
structures or persons. They shall also include appropriate native
and non-native, drought resistant vegetation, consistent with fire;
protection reraienmae
nts. This will make use df the inherent ability
of natural �e courses to iter sediments and take utanutrients. City of Redlands _:shall review and approve such
plans prior to permitting development within a Planning Sector:
(ampleted an, part of Specif i.c flan)
11 Storm runoff from the commercial designated land shall be
conveyed directly into the San Timoteo Creek channel, consistent
with County flood control management requirements. N/A-The ccauercial
site s not within,
13a Detenuon retention basu}s shall be incorporated in the design of
the wager courses created to handle storm runoff by the
managernent plans. Such basins shall be delined to detain peak
flows to excess natural peak flows for Intermediate regional
Flood (C-2)
14. The City should consider requiring a development fee to fund
critical downstream flood control facilities on San Tirnoteo Creek_ (4-ES)
1:5. The City should consider establishing the followingmaximum
impervious surface coverage on each lot.: N/A- 'b City adopted alternate
Land�e s arm i= M<axirnurn Coverage
0-15 1 acre = 43,560 sq. ft. 10% = 4,3.56 sq. ft.
16-30% 2-5 acres = 108,900 sq;ft. 517,c = 5,445 sq. ft
Over 3 Io 15 acres = 653,400 sq. ft. 1% „534 sq. ft.
r
€
16. The City should adopt and future development implement the Best
Management Practices provided in appendix 5.
( )(2) €
25
t n
r �
17. Because of the erosion sensitivity of all steep slopes, the City
should adopt an additional policy prohibiting any offroad vehicle
activity in the project area This should e backed-up b an
ordinance if necessary and rigorously enforced by the City police
Department for both erosion and fire hazard mitigation. (4-PIS)
18. Should the water supply for future development within; the project
area be obtained from the San Timoteo Basin aquifer, the City
should seek to acquire imported water to mitigated the potential
overdraft. ( --MU)
1 . If subsurface wastewater disCasal is permitted, all systems shall be
justified by a detailed star study that specifically addresses the
suitability for construction of such a system ("rr ) (HPC) 0 }
20. Alternatively, the City should explore the option of extending the
sewer line to the project area, or connecting with the Yucaipa
Valley Water District system. If economically feasible, sewer
connections should be extended to development within the project
area. (4- )
1. For all private or public underground storage tanks the construction
and operation requirements outlined in Appendix 6 shall be
implemented. N/A-No storage tanks are proposed.
22.
rops ed-
22. For any improvements in areas with riparian habitat (the only area
with such habitat identified is along San Timoteo Creek) the agency
or applicant implementing the improvements 'shall contact the State
Department of Fish and Gamine and the Army Corps of Engineers
regarding Section 1603 and Section 404 permits. ( )(2)
The biolo ' is concluded that the measures already incomorated within the
proposed Pan Amendment will accomplish_ substantial mitt ation. However,
based on the evaluation provided in the detailed a.na ysis section, this
document also recommends the adoption of the following biological resource
°mitigation measures;
. The significant reale of the perimeter fuel modification zone,
including the natural drainage channel, shall be recognized by the
inclusion of a landscaping plan either in future specific pias
prepared for each Planning Sector or prior to future subdivision
development within the alluvial canyons. This landscape plan shall
include enhancement by use of native riparian species that will ti#
benefit the biological environrnent. Edge treatment of all residential
"nodes, or areas is important, and the use of native,
rr
drought-resistent plants for landscaping is recommended. (D-1) r
q
4. Future landscaping plans shall include an element for capture and
restocking the drainage courses with horned lizards. This shall be �?
done under the supervision of a biologist and in cooperation with
the State Department of Fish and Game. (D--2)
26
,r
4v�yN
rY.rstAr= S�attfl:`l„a;a`'�tfn't tt7xl„°r.tf}Frfit$�zra;4tr`airi451,r{` 1},(fif�Yf?tYrljc;i=}ti77iiflt1K}}'tii� �tt } 3} a` i�a,:
25 The City shall require future developers to consult with the
Department of Fish and Gane (DFG) with the goal of implementing
,measures to retain the small deer herd in the project area_ if
concurred in by DFG, a herd management plan shall be funded and
implemented by future developers. (D-3)
26. Future developers shall work with Department of Fish and Game, the
California Division of Forestry,; and the City ;Fire Department to
prepare a fire management plan for the open space created by this
Plan Amendment. This plan shall detail the areas where fuel
modification is necessary, where fire-resistant vegetation should be
planted, emergency access for firefighting equipment, and aprogram
of prescribed bursts. Fire suppression to the wildland is un esirable
in the long terra die to the increased chances for an uncontrolled
wildland fire that can have catastrophic results. {D--4)
27. The City shall determine how the open space will be managed and
controlled. Several alternatives for ownership are possible.
Formation of an open space district which receives funding through
the _ property tax base is the best and most successful method.
Acgtatsitton through dedications, density transfers, and developer fees
is also possible. The future integrity of the open space will depend
on this ownership since effective management depends upon the
expertise of fire managers, reveetatzon specialists, recreation
planners,wildlife biologists, and land use planners. (pD)f 1
Based on the analysis provided in the detailed analysis, this document
recommends the adoption of the following air quality mitigation measures:
-18. The City shall explore the feasibility of providing park and ride lots
and encouraging car pooling of residents within the project area.. (E-1 )
29. The City shall consult with Omnitrans regarding the possibility of
extending ;a transit route to future project boundaries. If this: can
be accomplished, each specific plan shall be required to provide a
transit stop with facility improvements such as shelters, benches and
a bus pocket for easy ingress and egress. (F,.-2)
A Any future service stations or fuel storage tanks within the project
area shall incorporate the best available control technology for
potential hazardous emissions at the time of construction. Retrofits
shall be accomplished in accordance with future SCAQ41viD
requirements. N/A-No storage tanks Proposed.
.51. The follows mitigation measures are abstracted from. the District
Handbook and relate to short-term construction emissions,
a. Fugitive dust shall be controlled by regular water spraying
{
during construction activity.
i
2
nurztxrmY bit }} al,�nP $ \ih {#itis { h} tt3a�sxt
b. Contracts with construction companies shall require that all
equipment engines; be maintained to proper tune to minimize
emissions, including timing retard.
C. The contract with the construction company shall require that
construction be discontinued during first-and second-stage smog
alerts as forecasted by the District. E-
Based on the analysis in the detailed analysis section and the traffic study
in Appendix 11, this document recommendsthat the followingtraffic
mitigation measures be considered for implementation over the life of the
proposed plan Amendment-
32,
sera ent,32. The City shall implement Measures, such as signs and other traffic
control measures, to ensure that the following street in.tersectiors
with Sunset are not promoted as alternative travel routes: Kincaid
Street,_ Ridge Street, Rossrnont give, Puesta; cel Sol, and Palo Alto
Drive. (4-ES)
33. Traffic from future development that is permitted to access Sunset
Drive shall be on a street that will feed right turns to Sunset Indgve
in the a.. peak hour„ some left turn prohibitions (off of Sunset
toward downtown) may be necessary to beep *zaffic directyonally
constrained. N/A-No streets from developirent feed Sunt.
34. Additional access to Sunset Drive would be best if it were close to
Alta- Vista to encourage exiting Sunset on those streets rather than
into the City on residential streets which are too narrow for safe
and efficient operation. N/A-tea acmes in die above described area.
35. Access intersections shall be widened to increase sight distance : to
at least 35 miles, per hour or a minimum of 240- feet in each
direction. This may require extensive roadway curve radius
improvements for safe traffic operation. /A same as above.
36. With the current_ p. m. directional traffic split on Sunset Drive this
road should not be allowed to operate below LO "C' in the peals
periods. N/A- sam as above
32. The roadway may not be capable of full mitigation horizontally to a.
sight distance of 240 feet. In such cases lateral sight distance
would require clearance from the edge of a 12-foot traffic lane to 4
feet and a clear torte on the inside of the curves of up to 25 feet. N/A
t
38. If additional traffic is allowed on Sunset, require the following t
improvements between Alessandro and Edgemont; N/A
aw An S-curve approaching Kincaid {{
b. An S-curve west of Ridge
. Sharp S-curve at Ridge 7
d. -curve east of Ridge {
e. Approaches to Fairmont improved and cleared
r
2
s�)l`
�}f
3 . Improvements recommended for the Edgemont to Alta Vista section
h
of Sunset Drive include_
a. Widen the road from west of Helen to Vinton
b. Improve carves from Vinton to Elder
c. Improve curves from Elder to Edgemdnt
N/A
40. Based on the forecasted increased traffic at the Alessandro/Sunset
intersection, a traffic signal and sight distance improvements shall`
be implemented. (F-t )
41. If the Sunset Drive/Alta Vista give intersection incurs a peak hour
increase of 200 vehicles, the intersection will require L-af�c cont-.al
of some type to prevent LOQ from being reduced to "E". /A
?. Along Alessandro Road the increase in traffic is projected to require
traffic signals at both ends of the road, widening and perhaps
relocation of the bridge, and w-idehing of the road_, (F_3
3. The City shall coordinate with San Berrtardir.o and Riverside
Counties if cumulative traffic increases on Live -Oat. and sin Tiraoteo
Canyon Roads require construction of the road, at this ultimnate
precise plan of design (F-4)
44, Signalization of the Ilve Oak Canyon/San Tirroteo Canyon Road
intersection shall be implemented during the life of the project. tib'
City to niordtor.
Based on the analysis in the detailed analysis section, this docurn--nt
recom.-mends the adoption of the fallowing cultural resource Miti .;�tiort
measures:
5. A field survey for prehistoric resources and archival and field
surveys for historic resources shall be done for all future areas that
will be disturbed or developed within each specific plan area, L:
prehistoric or historic artifacts over 0 years in ace are encountered
they shall be assessed; their si,g gnificance determsned in accordance'
with professional criteria and regulations; and recommendations for
appropriate disposition trade to the Museum. Cxrleted with Specif ic Pte. �
4 . If prehistoric or historic artifacts over 50 years in age ~e
encountered below the ground surface while construction is
underway, then activities in the immediate area of the finds shall be
halted and an on-site inspection shall be performed imm, ediately by a
qualified archaeologist. This professional will be able to assess the
find, determine its significance, and make recommendations for F
appropriate disposition as outlined in measure 1 above. ( -1 }
47. If human bogies are encountered, then the San Bernardino Count,
Coroner's office must be contacted and all work, halted until a ext
clearance is given by that office and any other involved agencies, M
including Native Americans, if necessary. (G-3)
29
�1�
7a�t�t
31�
tl, Based on the analysis the detailed analysis sect'
}' section, this do ent
kf£rt
recommends the following . :
tnope mitigation measures:
}rtt
lr 8. Fuge
specific tans shah calculate noise levels based on specific
land used. These plans shall include noise mitigabort tncasurfor
erect compozaents that wall cause noise levels above the acceptable
Y rural residential background levels.
c pieted with specific per.
49.
The City shall consider the use of berms and landscape buffers to
reduce Boise impacts to residential areas due to rail or
vehicle traffic. ( /�)(l) motor
50. All future construction activities within the project area shall be
restricted to normal working hours (7 a. M. to 6 p. rn.) and all
construction equipment shall be required in the coastmcldon contract
to maintain sound muffling systems that comply with state and local
regulations. (H-2)
51. ,ill housing shale! comply with noise insulation standards, and if any
structures are permuted in the high noise zone adjacent to the
railroad, special noise insulation requiremen
mets ( -I) ts shall be unposed and
52. If lave Oak Canyon Road is realigned in the fu"tue, the City shall
ensure that noise impacts on existing and fixture residences north of
the existing road are mitigated to the Maximum degree feasible.
N/A- Not widlin PrOlectles.
Based on the analysis in the detailed analysis section, this document
recd .mends the following visual mitigation measures.
53. In the future specific plan for planning sector l? the City shall
ensure that the scattered rural _residential character is retained and
enhanced Several policies in the Plan Amendment support- this
requirement. N/ - Not withj_n Sector 12.
54. Require the entrances
n addjato canyons to screen development from views
cent roads by effective use of landscaping and berming. This
shall apply to the proposed commercial area to the ma)d nurrt degree
feasible. ( 1}
5.
radscaing plans shall be prepared for each larata'ng sector and
these p ans shall identify the various mechanism that will be used �
to screen development fror?views.
(1-2)
56. Any roads extended up to Sunset Drive shall stay off ridgelnes and
Shall minimize grading to the maximum degree possible. graded 4
areas shall be given high zatenstry remedial treatment to eliminate
X24
or mitigate scarring as rapidly as possible. (1-3) c
Based on the analysis provided in the detailed analysis section, this document
recommends the adoption of the following school mitigation measures: <{
tlt
��4t
4
lt�t�{fig
w, _ ,ssrr??}h 111¢= 3..:> 1S{,1ttxr11�11S54r}zo;,itttl7.t,nSy,t "„'lYr rrr rt,•rt#.,t}(y�r,ra{r,s««<t{{..i sr tt{rrrtrtr.ir 11.1�Yy111Ngg �� 111111"'1
t�71t$t
r
Y
{,fir 001 fees; of S1-50 per squarefoot
Y t` per square faot cci on new residential
tYrrr shall be paid when fu mmerci construction
and industrial development .
f $, tore development is approved. ( 4T
{ The City shall set aside sufficient area a
public facility land t the location identified for
� use to
i sffient school. Acquisition of tthe site requirements for an
thLr{
developer cation of the site t�,vrt land for public uses 'may p made er °developer or through y be
t e o er fee available throe a general
programa. Not w than pao a Mello-R.00s or limilar
Based on es.
the analysis provided above,
adoption of the fallowing recreation and this document _ recommends the
mitigation measures,
:59. Each pl
. g sector specific Plan Proposal forcentralizeda small p shall include an evalua,tibn and
centralized location �parlt with appropriate facilities in
leted of zf is Plan. a
60. Consistent with the Draft Park ,and
establish a developer fee to pen Space Plan, the Ci
future paf]t facilities c� eratiorzs support acquisition and shall
' p , and maintenance. funding for-
Based
or
Based on the analis provided in (x-�1)
recor=ends the adoption of e followingthe detailed
panalysis, u, 15 document
mitigation measures:
6 . The homes shall be designed to include
such;as deadbolts and peepholes. 1L- deterrence hardware
62.
Signage shall clearly indicate the nlumbero f
shah' be available that clean each
Portions of the development. y direct etherg cv en vehicles and sib
(��---�) to secthc
63. A map showing how the units are
Police Department. (L-3) nu mbered shall be provided to the
4. Entryways shall be
Policemen on visible from the street so
door, patrol can see an intruder attemptingpassersby and
(L-4) to open the 1
�5. Windows shall not be
obscured by hen
a screen.for an intruder. slirubbe
(L-5) �' that will pro��de
66. Future
hOmeowmers associations or residenda)
argaviation of a neighborhood w areas shall coordinate t#
Police Department. arch progratn with
(�-�} h _ the Redlands �{#
67.
Walkways, e trYwa s and co m �i
low glare, high i.nterasatyrnmon; traffic arias shall be lied girl?
lighted tr
, and energy erficient lighting. {,
68. Tie configuration 4 f (L-7)
F
urIj ts, landscaping, and pathways
shall be ,<
r
#��r
3I ;
r,krz�t ,,
„,er>,,4 Y! {ttiy r...tt.tUs£{{#£££�tat.aYtt.,#3, rzXtr�1J�?z1Yt<
f
designed } avoid
danger spans of low
activity can take place. (L-8) visibility 'here c '
rtmsnal
69. The above measures and
the specific plates others appro nate shy be addressed
Fin—
development that will be pprepared for each in
Vit}
city. t t�4_gdes gas shad be reviewed proved ” sector.
t } and approved by the
j$ T'he Ci
ty shall support tasreincreasedr implementing an
police fie assessment district to
alternatively thei shall Department manpower re uire ;en ;
z
maintain the ty increase fasndina 4
irrent high level of service. f ora gen
to
Based on (L-9)
adoption of the follow she Provided above,
g protection Mitigation
docent recommends tl e
L,atioQ me�sures.
71. At least 2 different
Shall be provided for all ublicly' dedicated
p anain areas ingress and egress routes
g and development Projects, )
1 A urns of 26 feet of pavement with
street shall be Provided for each access. parking on one side of the
p (M--2)
73. o cul-de-sac shall be longer than 35
developments where Cul-de-sacs less than feet, except in PUD [ -pe
with the approval of the Redlands Fire se 600 feet cars be allowed
74, partrrment_ (M� 3)
s`'�o dead end street will be
cul-de-sacs shall be required. allowed to be constructed, ternpdrary
75, No street shall exceed W70 Slope, an
all weather,,non-skid surfaces. p d aIt` streets shall(M-5) pave.be d
t�
76_ Driveways shall not exceed 15 feet in length o
77. � r 34o grade.
Perimeter streets shall be placed on the foothilltM �)
(This mitigation is consistent with the Policy side of develop.rn nt
7g. ion-combustible :and reflectivep cY statement in the plan tt,�--�
required to identify street and build* markers shall be
q all streets and buildings. fM-
7 ' Vegetation shall be removed IO feet
an additional 10() feet. from all roads and th
(Mirtrsed for
---9)
0Subdivisions are to be
Provided with
l aop) water mains f� inch or larger circulatiL2
minssuzn and storage capacity sufficient to
fire flow duration and hydrant ro�ide the
stanards- indicated below with a residual spacing un er
inch -1 pressure of 20 pounds
per) ourads �,
81. A rni'LIM of 2 private spigots
at each structure, will be Provided facing the foothill:; �t
i
11
§"tiv'.. ,.rrtr t3 rf;S4 rrF,ti}lrtt r `1 C h,
ff"£'sr,ttrrrtrX tti irf\kSt7r rfE,Yt <Yl} F, t a, is 't tS 1 ". tt?fi ?.r Yt rrst;i r}5c},r.nt .s irr,3 t..
•§�
lsj, ,}.sS{��ttat'szs,��71,sIi r{r.� f { 1I�I7�sl rs{,t<� �t /•� t, �", y� .,tE ,) r r ii ryy�.?�v� $5 c�{iF t n .tjt.r 3 r ,zF.. .,til}�77t�lii,�t,}�}tJ�tr,�rsftl��h±i{����{iri`;t������5 t����t�1'1���S;o Ys�iS�, �t�4 `�St�;��';••x�i��}"��`�#krr}�1��1?�11 ���� l�Y�3���t�3 �i��} �Y�t�3t.
�{ 82. Each farer
markers. ( �dant shall be identified with ,�
{r -�12) approved blue
k reflecting
�3. ch teal-dei
of 1 hydrant sac grew thaan 3C } feet in tent}a requires a minimurx�
84
F'
re flow gpm, duration
and according to �e Ci hydrant' spat'
85. a . . of Redlands rninGUm standardsg. h(MI t 4be Provided
utilities shall be underground;
b.
(M-15)
'ripen Brads of file
to prevent bird nests ofs r other
be capped with non�i
looted within the roof structure ther combustible Mable material
materials from being
7. Decking material shall be of at least � hour fire(M-16)re resistant rating. : (M--1 7)
88. No cave vents shall be allowed. (M-ts
89, Other vetats shall be covered b
mesh, not to exceed 144 square inches' inch corrosion resistant
(M-19) wire
90. No combustible
Instil materials shall be allowed such`
Plastic, bamboo, straw car fiberglass. pat10 covers with
1. leo cave vents shalt be allow (�-��)
92.
ed facing the natural open space. (M-21)
Any i in
P
p P g shall be non-coffibustible, all other Piping rztust
be underground. (M-22)
3, All accessory
..also c+�m I buildings, guest housixa
p with fire standards. g and secondary` housinz shall
(M-23
94.95All exterior walls
shall be 1 hour fire walls.
All roofing (M-2�)
:materials. shall be UBC noncombustible and non-wood roofing
(M-25}
q Construction materials shall
matcriaLs. Sidingsbe
shall be noncombustible,LC fire resistant
construction
7. himne (M-2 }
Y spark arresters shall have a 1
i
opening mounted in a vertical Position visible frgomgthee screen i ?
ground. inch
98. Structures sat (M-27)
,
PPortd to any degree by stilts shall
areas encased to the
ground with the same fare retardant matador
area as
reel for fire wafts. found
9 . al
Y windows facX
the natural open space shall have o �
glass or extra tren S
glass; (M-2 )' cable pained
33
r lt�t
ay..a }
r.. .;'r ,r;, ",,. -r. .. ..rr„-', r r r e a'. ? f rr•x"r rr vs'c. v ,s,,, a . ,v„..
r•i s... ._.c3s sttl„`zS`;t;1SYsiirc?.cya r«:, # St S r t v, tl ar sta titt fur t#r z t t tt {t is r, F t 3 €yt t}r r sit r'il1 Z ,ittr rs
{,t r.L33s - 4 r?i. S4
lf�tc�k3€�tf3�t tt��,t�t.
� rtt�s���,��t��
}��r
a
i 4}
l 100. Fencing shall be noncombustible and
access._ etas
(M-30) shall be eroded for
11. All property fines are to be placed a the top of the
slope.
}y p
#� 102. When buildable pads on natural (M-31 )
to Slopes topes of less than 30% ar
p greater than 30�o, then a e adjacent
`} feet from the edge of slope wherein pad set back shall be 3d
in het lope is greater than 30 feet
{'
vegetation maintained bentire Slope is landscaped r1 fire
y ann irT gado, system. resaste t
3{ I03 (M-32)
such lthaattd ces
tl equip every swimming Pool or significant
fighting purposes.water may e obtained t)uic~R. and easilyr fooru fire
(M--33)
ICS. Vegetation must be cleared 30 feet froth s
ornamental and ground cover structure (fire resistant
vegetation roust be irrigated plantings are allowed);
structures. thinned or' Modified for s o feet around
Teri foot clearances must be maintained from ci,.
ti.rances mu
stove pipe outlets. (May retain -S ecimen native shrubs- It :,hey or
trimmed 2 feet above the oun ws' if they are
feet in diameter, are paint ° do` not exceed approximate
leaves, etc. and are not closer together than 1 fefree Of et of ll id a wood, duff,�dr
105• Firewood trust be stacked on a contour away'frorn all homes.p ) (t -3 )
106. (rt-3�)
All feel t must be .greater than If} fee: from all vegetation clearance. (M--36) buildings with
107• Rewire homeowners associations
modification zones. to maintain the rebrea �el
108. The City shalt ins
compliance with tact
p homes on or around June 1 to
he vegetation clearance requirements. 6
109. Provide residential spriaklers within all homes (M-38) �
I�14. The above measures and others as appropriate (MY39)
the specific Tans
p that will al prereforeach plan-nino,essec in
Fina;[ development designs shall be reviewed and p
.Fire De � sector.
Department. ( --9o) approved by the
11L 71e City shall establish
acquire a an assessment district or
ire talion site as outlined in the text dicer means to
assessment district or other me ns mesion. a
future increased Depaninent manpowerld requirements;idered to support
the City shall increa e fundin alternatively s
present manpower/populationefrom general funds to mai
ratio. ratan the
a�
In order to tin i ate ftp-- 1)
g potential) si
document recommends y gnihcant solid wast �
ends that the fano � e disposal im act
wing measures be Implemented: �' s, this
3 s
112. The establishment of recycling centers and programs to reduce the
amount of solid waste materials which must be disposed of from the
prole The City can impose a source segregation program, a
volun,ar recyclin& center, or a mandatory recycling center to
accomplish mitigation of from 20% to 0,9o' of the existing waste
stream.
113. Independently pursue and obtain a permit to expand the existing
City operated land iU facility within the life of the existing facility. (n-2)
114. Support County efforts to develop an acceptable waste management
scheme that will be affordable and environmentally sound. (N_3)
The analysis in the detailed analysis section was presented to give
decision-makers an initial evaluation of the complexity of the water sup i
issue. Based on the analysis provided above, this document recommends the
adoption of the following water supply mitigation measures;
115. The City shall provide or identify a funding source that will fund a
study of the project area to determine the best techtucally,
environmentally, and economically) alternative for roviding water to
the project area. This :shall include a detailed look at existing
water wells and perhaps include the drilling and development of a
well in order to evaluate the ground water resource beneath the
project area.. (0-1 )
116. The future specific plans for each planning sector shall be developed
with sufficient detail to show how thelanning sector water system
infrastructure will integrate with the master panned system. (TT/Cup) (1)
117. "mater conservation measures should be outlined in each planning
sector specific plan; but shall include a list of drought resistant
native and non-native plants Haat are acceptable for use within that
planning sector. (ct-2)
Based on the analysis detailed in the analysis section, this document
recommends the adoption of the following wastewater management nutigation
measures:
115. Each future planning sector specific plan shall address the optimum
means of managing wastewater. This can be in the form of a ,
detailed subsurface disposal system study or as a review of a
package wastewater sewage treatment system.- However, in each
case sufficient information should be included so both the Digi and
the Water Quality Control Board can male a fully informed decision. C44KttI1 }
119. If a package treatment system is considered, the option of providing
sufficient treatment to allow reuse of the water shall be evaluated; N/A ;#
10. An proposals to develop a residence on the ridges shall require a
thorough evaluation of subsurface disposal before issuing building ,
permits. (Tr/CUP) (HPC)t11
stn
35
r
, r}fieAt, ,ss,f;`>nlfYts�t:,tts���?ssl�sU22f a}�.tslr�i s�,�za;sSi���s`.�s�'s;�31�,54s�4S,1��aft�r�ut}�1,�ns�;ri�s4�is4�jttt{j7rJ�r'1�{siti>z���t..
s
tr
est
spy s�
�s�` 121. Commercial uses often generate wastewater with uniue
characteristics that require special management. The specific pati
for the designated commercial arca shad address the specific wastes
�x that may be generated from the commercial site and shall provide an
analysis of management requirements to ensure that no significant
adverse environmental impact will occur from wastewater generated
at this lotion. N/A - No omnercia ; a p,,p,:,�.
b
Based can the analysis detailed in the analysis section, this document
recommends the adoption of the following energy mitigation measures.
J-)-). Future projects developed under the; proposed Plan Amendment shall'
be evaluated - for energy conservation design, and for conformance
with the Subdivision leap Act, Section 66473.1 (4-1 )
121 All construction in the project area shall conform with the most
recent energy conservation standards. (4-2)
124. All units shall be made energy efficient by incorporating as many of
the following measures as feasible: (Q- )
a. Solar water heating/space heating systedis.
b.' Installation of insulation throughout new structures.
C. Design and orientation of the structures to face in a
north/south direction so as to permit less heat gain in the
summer,
d. N'Y'here ideal orientation of structures in not feasible, overhanszs,
external shading on windows, and heat reflective glass on the
cast and west exposures should be used to moderate heat gain.
e. Clear glass should be used in south facing windows to perp-Lit
maximum heat`gain during winter' months.
L Appro nate, well-placed landscaping and reduced. paved surfaces
will hep to moderate temperatures near structures.
g. fluorescent lighting should be used in structures to the
greatest degree feasible.
125. During the review for any major new industrial or commercial
facilities, the City shall ensure that any new electrical facilities are
compatible with the SCE transmission and customer service {
distribution steers.
tv/A _ No ocure=ial uspstip
126. As the few required system modifications in the project area proceed
4�k
to approval, the City shy review each modification to ensure that
potential significant adverse impacts are either avoided or mitigated '}t
to a level of nonsignificance. (=om)(4-CD) $r
36t�t
r
Based on the analysis in the detailed analysis section, this document
recommends the adoption of the following energy mitigation measures.
127. Futureprojects developed under the proposed Plan Amendment
should tie evaluated for energy conservation design and for
conformance with the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66473.1 (es, ) fir .
128. All construction should be required to conform with the most _recent
energy conservation standards. (Q-2)natural gas
Based on the evaluation provided in the detailed analysis section, this
document recommends the adoption of the following telephone system
mitigation measures*
: 9. In order for GTE to provide efficient service to future
developments, adequate access must be allowed and provisions fo
rights of way and easements must also be provided. ( )(1 )
130. GTE must receive adequate notice of any development in order t
install necessary as ct re. ( )( )
37
5
Additional mitigation measures for the E general Plan EIR as requested by
members of the edlands Environmental Review Committee.
1. San Bernardino County has established a priority within the Yucaipa Road
Fee District for improving the 1-10/Live Oak Canyon Road freeway
interchan e. Msa Mese improvements include ramp wideni.n, and some
signali. aation at the interchange. Although future projects in the
Southeast General Plan Amendment area are technicaliv outside the
benefit area, contributions to improvements at this Interchange in
accordance with the recently adopted 'uc pa Transportation Fee
Ordinance shall. be provided by future sp ci c developments in the
General Plan.Amen ent area. (PI)(3)
?'. If future evaluations indicate the need for secondary treatment o,,-
wastewater
fwastewater generated within the project area., the City shall consider
extending a sewer tri line from its existing treatment plant to the
project area.: as a means of providing this level of treatment.
Alternatively, the City may consider ether conventional or unconventional
engineering solutions to both the collection and treatment of sewage
generated within the project area. Such alternatives must be accornoa.niied
y engineering eeriestudies for the City staff to judge the;r adequac and
shall be reviewed. and approved by the City prior to being-implemented. (4-MU)
3. The limited traffic study prepared for: the Southeast General Plan
Amendment provided sufficient information for evaluating traffic impacts
along Sunset Drive. However, major concerns have been expressed by
local residents about potential traffic through residential streets, such as
Rossrnont or Palo ,alto, that provide access to dow-ritown Redlands. To
identify traffic management alternatives for this area the City should
conduct a comprehensive computer traffic model analysis of Sunset Drupe
and its feeder streets prior to approval of major subdivisions taking
access from Sunset Drive. This study should include a cumulative impact
evaluation of all existing unbuilt lots that have or are expected to have
access onto Sunset Drive. (4-ES)
In addition, all of the traffic mitigation measures shall be found consistent
with Resolution 3877
x
l
j
l
l
APPENDIX B
MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST
CITY OF REDLANDS
MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING CHECKLIST
Date Filed:
------------------------------
Project Case Name/Number :
-------------------------------------------------------------
Project Location:
Pro ect Applicant/Monitor (Address and Phone Number ) :
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
Monitoring Phase ( Tentative Tract, Improvement Plan,
Construction, Post Occupancy) :
-------------------------------------------------------------
Mitigation Measure Met or is Continuing to be Met:
Date., Yes : No: Description of Mitigation Measure:
------- ---- ---- 1 .
------- ---- ---- 2 .
3.
------- ---- ---- 4 .
------- ---- ---- S .
------- ---- ---- 6 .
7 .
------- ---- ---- 8.
------- ---- ---- 9 .
------- ---- ---- 10 .
(Attach additional pages if necessary. )
Applicant Signature: City Approval :
------------------------------- ------------------------