HomeMy WebLinkAbout7565_CCv0001.pdf RESOLUTION NO. 7565
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
REDLANDS ADOPTING THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2015-2016
THROUGH 2019-2020
WHEREAS, the San Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure "I"
in November 2004 authorizing San Bernardino Associated Goverrunents, acting as the San
Bernardino County Transportation Authority (the "Authority"), to impose a one-half of
one percent retail transactions and use tax (the "Tax") applicable in the incorporated and
unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and
WHEREAS, revenue from the Tax may only be used for transportation
improvement and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set
forth in Ordinance No. 04-01 of the Authority; and
WHEREAS,the Authority's Strategic Plan requires each local jurisdiction applying
for revenue from the Valley Major Street and Freeway Interchange Programs to annually
adopt and update its Capital Improvement Plan; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Redlands hereby adopts the Measure "I" Five-Year Capital Improvement Program for
Fiscal Years 2015-2016 thru 2019-2020, a copy of which is attached to this resolution as
Exhibit "A".
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 15"' day of September, 2015.
Paul W. Foster, Mayor
ATTEST:
x�a
Sam Ir i, 'ity Clerk
B--clerk\Resolutions\Res 7500-7599\7565 Measure I CIP 5 Year 9 15 15.docx
I, Sam Irwin, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the
15`h day of September, 2015, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Harrison, Gilbreath, Barich, James; Mayor Foster
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Sam Irwin, City erk
L\cclerk\Resolutions'\Res 7500-7599\7565 Measure I CIP 5 Year 9 15 15.doex
Exhibit A
CITY OF REDLANDS
MEASURE I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
EXPENDITURE STRATEGY
Fiscal Year 2015-16 through Fiscal Year 2019-20
The City of Redlands intends to use Measure "I" dollars to partially fund the City's City
Council-approved Pavement Accelerated Repair Implementation Strategy (PARIS) program
which will pave 2/3 of City streets over a five-year period. The City's Pavement Management
Program, which provides a decision making matrix in identifying streets that are priority paving
projects, will be used to determine future Measure "I" Capital Improvement Plans. Additionally,
banked Measure "I" revenues will be used in Fiscal Year 2015-16 for the construction of the
Redlands,Alabama &Colton Intersection Improvement project.
VALLEY SUBAREA
MEASURE"I" REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR LOCAL PASS-THROUGH FUNDS 2015/2016 to 2019/2020
Population Estimated Annual Local Pass-Through Amount Total FY 15116 through
VALLEY SUBAREA Distribution :9120
Percentage FY 15115 FY 16117 F1'17118 FY 18119 FY19120
Chino 5.52% : $ 1,299,794.40: $ 1,338,788.23: S 1,382,298.85: $ 1,430,679.31 f$ 1,487,906.48 $ 6,939,467.27
..._......._............................._........................................,...............,.......................................-...........y......._......._.._......_......._._...._..y......._......._......._.._._...._......._...,......._......._......._..........._.........y..._.._......._.._..._......._..........._...»-......»».....,...»...,..._..................
Chino Hills i 5.08% : $ 1,196,187.60: S 1,232,073.23; S 1,272,115.61: $ 1,316,639.65 S 1,369,305.24 $ ' 6,386,321.33
Colton 3.49% $ 821,790.30 S 846,444.011 S 873,953.44; 87
$ 904,541.81 S 940,723.48 $ 4,3 ,453.04
.._..........................................._..........:......._......._.................,........_.._......._..._.._......._.._.......T..........._.._.._......._......._......._..T......_.._..._......._....._...._......._...r......_......._......._.....
F..._.._......._......._......._..........._....................�..._......_......._.........
Fontana 13.36°!° $ 3,145,879.20€ S 3,240,255.58: S 3,345,563.88: $ 3,462,658.62:$ 3,601,164.96 $ 16,795,522.24
..................................-...........................i..............._..........._.......,........_.._......._......._......._.._.......+......._......._.._......._......._......._..w......_.._..._......._..-......._......._...,......._......._......._..........._......._......_...................._......._................._......._...........»..........,.........»...,.
Grand Terrace ! 0.81% •. $ 190,730.70` $ 196,452.62: $ 202,837.33':- $ 209,936.64:S 218,334.10 $ ;: 1,018,291.39
_......._.........._......._......._.._.......,......._......._.._......._......W......._.._.._..._......._......._.._.......W......_......._.._......._......._......._.._......_.._..._......._.._.._..._......._..._......_......._......._..........._......._.._..._.._......._.._..._......._..........._...._....... .......»..»...,.,,.........,.
Highland 355! 835,918.50 $ 860,996.06' $ 888,978.43' $ 920,092.67 r..$._.._......._.._..._.9..5...6._,.8...9..6....38....._$
_......._......._._......._.._..._....._.._ _ ...._......._... f......._......._.._ _ _.._..._..k....._....._......._.._....._......._. ......_......._......._.........._......._..i. . .._..._::.:.....4_.,.4..6...2.,.$.,.8...2..0...3.,.
Loma Linda 1.55% € S 364,978.50:$ 375,927.86: $ 388,145.51: $ 41)1,730.60: $ 417,799.83 $ 1,948,582,30
_......_......._.._......._......._......._.._....._;....._......._._......._.............._.._......._......._......._.........y......._......._.._..._........._....... ..._......._......._.._......._..... . ..................._................... _._........_......._......._...........
Montclair 2.52% ` $ 593,384.4D $ 611,185.93': $ 631,049.47: $ 653,136.21' $ 679,261,6_5 $ 3,168,017,67
_......._.......__........._......._.._..._.._......., ..._...........,..,..._..._........._.._......._......._......._.._.......,......._......._.._..._.._......._......._..,...._....,,._......._..__....._....... _......._..._._..........._,,,.... _._........._..._.,....._....,......
Ontario 11.04% $ 2,599,588.80: S 2,677,576.46: S 2,764;597.70: S 2,861,358.62; S 2,975,812.96 $ 13,878,934,54
.-,......_...................._......._......._.._.......{__......_.._.._......._..............._.._......._.....__......._.._.......y......._......._.._......._......._......._..y......._......._......._..__....._.._..._...r......_......._..._.._..........._......._..i...__........._._...._......._..........._.....»,.,,.......;..,.., ...._.._..._...
Rancho Cucamonga 11.39% $ 2,682,003.31) S 2,762,463.40; S 2,852,243.463 $ 2,952,071.98: $ 3,070,154.86 $' 14,318,937.00
_......._.._......._......._.._..._.._......._..._...._._.._......._..._. ......._.._.._..._......._......._.._......._......_......._.._...._._......._......._.._......_......_......._.._......_.._..._........._......._......._..........._.......-..}...__........._......._......._..........._.....,,,,......,....,..._..._ ,__.......
Redlands 4.60% : $ 1,083,162.00: $ 1,115,656.86) $ 1,151,915.71 $ 1,192,232.761 S 1,239,922.07 $ 5,782,889.39
................................................._.......:.................
._......._...._,.,........_..»...»...»_.....,,-.._.......t....,.,...._.._.,...._......._._,..-..w......_._..._......._.._._...._......._...,......._......._.,....._......._.._......._......_..........._......._......._..........._...._.......__......._.._.....,..........,.
Rialto
..._.. 6.68% _ : $ 1,572,939.60: $ 1,620127.79: S. 1,67
,».. ..... 2781.94: $ 1,731,329.31S 1,800,58248 ._...... ��:8.397,761
.........._.......................... w ..............»..«.. a .......................,.............. «..........., . ..............._......................................._.... ....1...2._
San Bernardino 13,99% : $ 3,294,225.30 S 3,393,052.06: S 3,503,326.25: $ 3,625,942.67 S 3,770,980.38 $ 17,587;526.66
............_.._.........-..............._.._.......i......._......._....................t......._.._.._..._......._......._..__.....w......_......._.._......._......._.._..._..w......_._..._......._.._.._..._......._...,.._..._......._.......-..........._......._..e..._..........._..............._..............------
Upland E 4.96% $
_......._......._..........._......._......._.._.............._......._.._.... 1,167,931.20 $ 1,202,969.14: 1,242,065.63' $ 1,285,537.93:S 1,336,959.45
..._...... _ .1..._......._.._......._......._. � ..........._..............................a......................._......._.............._..................6.,.2_.3..5.,.4,,.6...3.35
....
Yucai a 3.46% $ 814,726.20 $ 839,167.99: S 866,44D.95'•, $ 896,766.38` $ 932,637.03 $ .'. 4,349,738,54
i
__........p....._..........._......._......._................._......._.._......._......y........_.._......._......._......._.._........r......_......._.._......._..._.._......._...,......._......._..._.._.._......._......._...r......_......._......._..........._......._..t..._..........._......._...................._....._..._...........................,......«...,.
CountyfValley 8.00% •. $ 1,863,760.00`•. S 1,940,272.80':. S 2,003,331.67 $ 2,073,448.27: S 2,156,386.21 S` 10,057,198.95
Total Valley Region 100.00% $ 23,547,000.00 S 24,253,410.00 $ 25,041,645.83 $ 25,918,103.43 $ 26,954,827.57 $ ` ' 125,714,988.82
Local pass-through funds equal 20%of total Measure"I"funds collected.
7/1/2015
MOUNTAIN/DESERT SUBAREA
MEASURE "I" REVENUE ESTIMATES FOR LOCAL PASS-THROUGH FUNDS 2016/2016 to 2019/2020
Distribution Percentage Estimated Annual Local Pass-Through Amount
MOUNTAINIDESERT (50%Population 8.50%Revenue Goneration) Total FY 15116
SUBAREA :.,:,through 19120
Population Revenue Generation FY 15116 FY 16117 FY 17118 FY 18119 FY 19120
.,._.............._......._....................................._......._........................_..»,...,,........_......._.._........,......._......._.._......._......._......._..y......._......._......._.._......._......._...,.._..._......._......._..........._......._......_..........._......._......._.._......._......_......._..........._........................... _..........,... ...,.......,».._.:.
Needles E 69.27% 85.20% i S 121,104.48 E S 124,737.61 S 128,791.59 E$ 133,299.29 E$ 138,631.26 S 646,564
..._......._..........................._......._..........T..nn,_,,.,.............................._.._......._......._......._.._.......T......_..........._................_....... .................................._....... ..._......._......._..........._....... _..........._......._......._..........._ ...................._......._......._...... .._
.....t.... _...r... _..i... ...;.._ ... _...._..........._._....._ ..5
Coun (Colorado River 30.73% 14.80% is 35,695.52E S 36,766.39 $ 37,961.29 i$ 39,289.94 E$ 40,861.54 $ 190,575
Colorado River Subarea I 100.0095 100.00% S 156,800.00E$ 161,504.00E S 166,752.88€$ 172,589.23 5 179,492.80 $ :.' 837,739
i
..._................_..........._...................._......y_...................... ......[....................._......._......._.._..._..y.............................................[......................... ................j..............._...... ........................_..........._......._......._..........._....._......._.................................... _
Twentynine Palms
..........._......._..........._...... 35.76% 25.40% is 451,636.02 I S 465,185.10 S 480,303,62 $ 497,114,24 $ 56,99.8.81 ..S...y
._......._.._.. _ .............._.._........,..........................................w......................................_ .......... ...:.:..,..::..:...2....,.4..1.«1.,,,2,.3...8..
..
Yucca Valley 29,54% 63.65% $ 688,161.56 S 708,806.40 S 731,842.61 $ 757,457.10 $ 787,755.39 S 3,674,023
Count/Moron o Basin 34.70% 10.95°h €S 337,102.43 S 347,215.50 S 358,500.00 S 371,047.50:$ 385,889 40 S 1,799,755
Morango Basin Subarea 100.00% 100.00% $ 1,476,900.00 E$ 1,521,207.00€$ 1,570,646.23 t:$ 1,625,618.85 E$ 1,690,643,60 $ 7,885,016
1
Barstow 41.11% 48.67% E$ 1,485,814.11E$ 7,530,388.53=S 1,580,126.76 r:$ 1,635,430.56 t:$ 1,700,847.80 ST 7,932,607
_..........................................._.................._......._.................:........_.._......._......._......._..__........_......._...,,,...._....... ...._.....,,....................,,.......,_....»..,,.j..........................................._......_..........._......._......._..........._......_......._..........._......._......._......... _
County/North Desert 68.89% 51,33% 1$ 1,824,085.89?$ 1,878,808.47E$ 1,939,869.74 i$ 2,007,765.18E$ 2,088,075 79 S 9,738 605
North Desert Subarea 100.00% 100.00% is 3,309,900.00E$ 3,409,197.00€$ 3,519,995.90€$ 3,643,195.76 $ 3,788,923,59 $ 17,677,212
.__......._......._......_..._.....................».................................. .................._.......................... ............................................s..........................................c.............._..............................c...............................................s....................................._...............
8i Bear Lake10.22% 45.21% is 342,640.55;$ 352,919.76E S 364,389.65 ;$ 377,143.29;$ 392,229.02 S 1,829,322
_ ...._......._..........._..._._..................
......._......._.._._...._..............._.._......._......._......._.._........,......._......._.._......._......._......._...,......._......._......._.._......._......._..."......_..._.._......._..........._......._......_..........._......._......._.._......._......_......._.._......._......._...,..._...,...,, »..... ,,.,,.....»..,....«...,,,».....
County/Mountains 69.78% 5419% is 693,1359.46 $ 920,469.24 S 950,384.49 I$ 983,647.95'•$ 1,022,993.86 S ': 4,771;455
Mountains Subarea 100.00% 100.00% $ 1,236,300.00 $ 1,273,389.00E$ 1,314,774.14E$ 1,360,791.24E S 1,415,222.89 $ 6,600,477
..._....................................................1.........................._.......I........_.._......._......._......._.._........1......._......................................
€._...........................................i.............................................E................................................i._.......................................I..... .............._,........................
Adelanlo
.A..__p....p.....l..e....V...a_ll_e.Y......._....... .......,._..._........._...8.....5_.1._%..._.._..............._.._......2._..9...3...%_......._.._......_I,..S....._......._.._.....6..3_.8..,..3..8_.0...._6._0...I,......._..._.._......._6..5_.7..,_5..3_.2.....0.._2...I,.S 678,901.81 I S 702,663.37.I$ 730,769.91 _.S..
............. _ .............,,.......s _. ..-.._......_......1........_..................................... _ ..................................;...............................................;......................_......._.......-......................:
1837% 15.026 =$ 1,863,245.4B E$ 1,919,142.84'$ 1,9B1,5149B€S 2,050,868.01 $ 2,132,902.73 $ ......_.._......93...,,.94.._40_87..,,.26._74...4
..._....................................................................................... ......... 8..
__........._.._..._..._..
Hesperia 23.72% 23.98% is 2,661,779.25E S 2,741,632.63':$ 2,830,735.69':S 2,929,611.44 E$ 3,047,003.89 S _ 14,210,963
........_......._..........._......._......_..........;......._......._.._......._...... ......_.._......._.......a......_.._.,.....s....,,. W..._.._......._......._...._.........._..._.._......._.._..._.._......._...,..,...._...........................................,,........,,,.......... __......._........._
Victorville 1 31,18% 51.16/° $
_......._......._..........._......._......._.._.......,........................_...... 4,594,777.85„S 4,732,621.19 $ 4,886,43137S 5,057,456,47 S 5,259,75473 S
_ _ .._... 24,531,042
CountyNictorValle 18.22% E 6.91% $ 1,402,316.83 E S 1,444,386.33 E S 1,491,328.89 E S 1,543,525.40E S 1,605,26641 $ 7,486824
Victor Valley Subarea 100.00% 100.00% 1$ 11,160,500.00 1 S 11,495,315.00 S 11,868,912.74 1$ 12,284,324.68 $ 12,775,697.67 $ 59,584,750
3
Total Mt Desert Region I$ 17,340,400`$ 17,860,612 $ 18,441,082 $ 19,086,520;5 19,849,981 $ 92,578,594
Local pass-through funds are 70%of total Measure"I"funds collected,less 2%(of the 70%)set aside for PDIiMS projects.
711/2015
Attachment A
Please do not change,altar or modify this template.Use plus signs along(eft side ofwarksheet to odd rows ratherthan manually inserting rows to ensure formulas aro Carried through.
MEASURE I LOCAL STREET PASS-THROUGH FUNDS FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
PLAN PERIOD: 201512016 to 201912020
AGENCY NAME City of Redlands FY201512016 FY 201612017 FY 2017/2018 FY 2018/2019 FY201912020 TotaiAvailable`
jfnpywer pAA o hro; j
SCARRYOVER BALANCEYd EASURE l ESTIMATE: $1,063,162.00 1 51,115,656.00 31,151,315-OD S1,192,232.00 51,239,922.00 1 55,782,887.00
Estimated Teial Nexus PtoJed7 FY201512016 F72016=7 FY 201712D18 :.FY201812019 .:::FY201912020 Total Local Streel
Pladest Coal nme .ea. Ca oust. .'Curnm .�Cm over C.ImM �..Ce over �Currant .�ca attar Cumenl ::Co :�MaasunF
.`. `': arxnlYf msae R.7 Carry— ::. ry ray try nyrner ¢urreM .Pmgrunmed [.
Named PCOjeCt5: Funds "Estimate Funds EslWale Funds Esil.A. Funds EsIlm le Funds Es11m de
GGy,of Re01pnd4,Pavemem ACCllefaled ReFBV ImfiMI0111a1tOn$trelegy 1pARl9t.•.••-•••.•• •, •.•.••.,,,•.••„••.•,.•••.,• ..,•••.,,•.•,.-••• $.•.1083,162.005,.,1.115.656.00 ,•-,---, -• $,-1,151.915.00 ,.-,_..,,,,. 5.,1792212A0 -.-.,_. $ 7239;922.DD "'$6,782,887.00
45eeallacirmarila for FY stieel ����- ��� -���-� �•�••� ��� $0.00
................................................................... .;:..
- ... - ...........,
...-------_...... ........ ... .. ..._..._.... ............----- - .-.... .. - :.: :..i:...�
.........- ---- .... .... - -- ....... - -......... .
..... -' -- '- o
................................................................. ...........................
....... ....... ..................... ....
wad
............................................................ `fa od
-f6:6o
..........................................�.................._......_................................_.................._..._......................_......................._..........................._....................................._.... . .
50.00
---------------...-------'-----------------------------'-........._...............,......................................:.....,,......................................_,......-....- -............-'-'- ..... __ ............... ............... _............ .......
... ..... _..._. .....:... ......Scot,
......................:........................................
.a*db
00
......................................................... _.-.... ...-_.._..-,.. .-. _. .., --...---•-----.... .........-.,..... ....
....... ...
.............................................................................................. .... ... .... ..... .............. .............. .............. .............. ....... ........... ........... ..5(1.06
......................................................... ............ .............. ......... ...... ...... -. .--...._..... ._.._ ...._...
............................................................ .... ................................................ ....................................._........_....._...._......_.. ...
00
:.....................:........................................................... .................... ...:.................................................... .........:. - --- ... ... ......... - - -.. ........................................... s:: ...
-----------•..........................................................................................................................................................._........... ................................................----.........._........................._......_.................._...............................•--•-• a: :
... ..--' ------ ....--- .. - -- .... ................. ao
..................... ..............................:.......................................:....,.. . ,. ...................... ............................ ..... ....... ................................... _.. ....... ... . .......... .. ........:.'.;.,......: .
............................................................................•._..................._..........._.........._......_..................................._..........._......................... ................... ..... ................................................................................................................:::::::i::::.:i: a?
Proled Cart 2 <Named Prt a:ts Toltl $ S $ 708376200 S 5:1.415,656.00 S 5"1757915,00 S - $ 4.192.232.00 $ $ 1239.922.00 '' 55.782.507.00
, , . . . , :$5_782.B9.TOI7D0
Nrmud F(em1s :100% ''100X' :': 100% ' 100% 100%
Categorical Projects Total'
.. .yr..yr ... i - ... ....... -,...• e
r ,
............................................................................................................................................... s. l `z....................zt�s " :A-a ._......._.......... ............... ter-
............................................................................................................................................... r k ', ?. Y�. .............. .............. '� �' .,. •S .: DO
......................_.._........,...........,,...._..._ ........._............_ -.-.. _.. _tif.? -,....,.... t' .. ........... ....... ,.
...............................................................................................................................................Pe i g;.._..................!�cp; ............... >:°a.�t.•�.��........... .s ...................�, ........ .: 00
vc
............................................... ., '1............ J ...... ._ ... .. P� ........._.... '.X1100
:::Ctir9tiltot PrgiilsTmd $ 7777`rF3"".,�w.,...-. 5 .:. �„,. �. $ ;.... N. •�5 ..._.-77
. .. SOAO
t4)Calrnir#d Ploinets'(clrea#oxr.PSA:.O%) 0%.`
()=Canyoverfallda may not be used on CofegorlcalPmfecfs. Total programmed:S 5,782.887.00
Tel e1C.""11 Programmed;S
In Aecorda�ce.wahAlsesO istratenle Plea Pellsv x0001: Total Es11maled Programmed;S 5,782.897.00
1 Ir rdmsval 000crtedtocrqua5251pp.O0P.inen Ad mdvidpaly in win ed Prncsts sedim Cheek:S 5.792.897.00
2 TIKN 5a 50v.1mt m telel c410a¢al pfgats 150%of Estimated Mcasuro l plus copyo"n S 8.674,330 AO
3 T"na 150.6_uiasx M told pla ,cl cKprnd%t—to)d—e leanedm rerenun Does progmmtng.mount excHd 150%II.R: No
a EaDtOdat—alMtaasuo l Local Street Ands mast oodetaad n the FnoYoa,Gold nff.-erx Ften al a axsgted by rosel,a a0In gworm0 body
5 Round CM46 tnptwemeat PioF aro dun to SNIBAG by the and of me Ned year otong vtn the
REVN
resoMn
GOO1MoR:
R50LTOAPWSL
DATE
CONTACT PERSON&TITLE,
cc ACT PHONE;
CONTACT EM A11.1
ka,o 1u>r 1,7015
Nexus Project? FY2015-2016 Total Local Street
Estimated Total Project Cost :Public DIF Carryover Current Measure l
Named Projects: Share{°�)
Share Funds Estimate Programmed
City of Redlands-PARIS
ALTA VISTA DR $ 42,900.00 $ 42,900.00 $42,900.00
ALABAMA ST $ 143,300.00 $ 143,300.00 : $143,300.00
SUNSET DR $ 69,095,00 $ 69,095.00 $69,D95.00
SAN BERNARDINO AVE $ 80,700.00 $ 80,700.00 $80,700.00
CENTER ST $ 196,500.00 $ 196,500.001 $196,500.00
TERRACINA BLVD $ 65,900.00 $ 65,900.00 '.':$65,900.00
HIGHLANDAVE $ 40,300.00 $ 40,300.00 $40,300.00
CALIFORNIAST $ 134,800.00 $ 134,800.00 $134,800.00
PIONEERAVE $ 6,800.00 $ 6,800.00 :$6,800:00
GARDEN ST $ 207,267.00 $ 207,267.00 4207,267:00
ORANGEST $ 83,300,00 $ 83,300.00 $83,31)p.00
MARIPOSA DR $ 91100,00 1 1$ 9,100.00
PROSPECT DR $ 3,200.00 $ 3,200.00 $3,280.00
$D.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
-$0.00
$o.go
-- $0.00
$0.00
$aoo
$D.00
$0.00
$0.0D
$0.00
Named Projects Tota l: $ 1,083,162.00 $ ' - $ 1,083,162A0 ; $1;083,162.00
Total Carryover`+Estimate: $ 1,083,162.00 $1,083,162.00 $1,083,162.80
(%)Named Projects: 100°/a
Nexus Project? PY2016-2017 Total Local Street
Estimated Total Project Cost :Public . DIF :.: Carryover Current Measure I
Named 'Projects: Share(��) snare{��} Funds Estimate Pro rammed
City of Redlands- PARIS
BROOKSIDE AVE $ 91,900.00 $ 91,900.00 $91,900.00
MARGARITA DR $ 7,850.00 $ 7,850.00 $7,850.00
ALABAMA ST $ 124,400.00 $ 124,400.00 $124,400.00
SUNSETDR $ 199,850.00 $ 199,850.00 $199,850.00
ALTA VISTA DR $ 69,289.00 $ 69,289.00 $69,289.00
W MARIPOSA DR $ 36,100,00 $ 36,100.00 $36,100.00
CALIFORNIA ST $ 216,267.00 $ 216,267.00 $216,267:00
ELIZABETH ST $ 148,400.00 $ 148,400.00 $148,400.00
HIGHLANDAVE $ 125,500.00 $ 125,500.00 $125,500.00
PALM AVE $ 51,600.00 $ 51,600.00 $51,600.00
CLARKST $ 17,650.00 $ 17,650.00 $17,650.00
ORANGE ST $ 5,400.00 $ 5,400.00 $5;400.00
GARDEN ST $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $6,000.00
PROSPECT DR $ 1,250.00 $ 1,250.00 $1,250.00
ALTA LOMA DR $ 14,200.00 $ 14,200.00 :$14,200.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.40
$0:00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0,00
$0:00
$0.00
Named Projects"Total; $ 1,115,656.00 $ $ 1,115,656.00 $1,115,656.00
Total Carryover+Estimate: $ :1 115,656.00 - $1;115,656.00 $1;115,656.00
(%) Named Projects: 100%
Nexus Project? fY2017-2018 Total Local Street
Estimated Total Project Cost public DIF Carryover Current Measure
Named 'Projects: Share(%) Share(%) Funds Estimate Pro rammed
City of Redlands-PARIS
SUNSET DR $ 423,700.00 $ 423,700.00 $423,700.00
GARDEN ST $ 116,600.00 $ 116,600.00 $116;600.00
HIGHLANDAVE $ 66,897.00 $ 66,897.00 $66,897.00
COUNTRY CLUB DR $ 8,733.00 $ 8,733.00 !$8,733.00
ALTA VISTA DR $ 56,100.00 $ 56,100.00 $56,100.00
PALM AVE $ 295,290.00 $ 295,290.00 $295,290.04
ALABAMAST $ 75,660.00 $ 75,660.00 $75,660.00
ELIZABETH ST $ 20,226.00 $ 20,226.00 ,.$20,226.00
LINCOLN ST $ 3,596.00 $ 3,596.00 $3,596.00
ARROYO CREST $ 16,474.00 $ 16,474.00 $16,474.00
COLLEGE AVE $ 68,639.00 $ 68,639.00 168,639.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
-$0.00
_ $0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$o.00
$0.00
$0.00
$000
$0.00
Named Projects Total: $ ;1,151,915.00 :$ - $ 1,151;915.00 $1,15'1;915.00
Total Carryover+:Estimate: $ 1;151;915.00 $1;161;915.00 $1151,915.00
(%)Named Projects: 100%
Nexus Project? EY2018-2019 Total Local Street
Estimated Total Project Cost Public DIFCarryover Current Measure I
Named 'Projects: Share(%) Share(%) Funds Estimate Programmed
City of Redlands
CALIFORNIA ST $ 95,500.00 $ 95,500.00 $95,500.00
BARTON RD $ 414,163.00 $ 414,163.00 $414,163.00
SAN BERNARDINO AVE $ 68,775.00 $ 68,775.00 $68,775.OQ
TEXAS ST $ 78,556.00 $ 78,556.00 $78,556.00
DEARBORN ST $ 326,234.00 $ 326,234.00 $326,234.00
WABASH AVE $ 69,063.00 $ 69,063.00 $69,063.00
COLTON AVE $ 94,000.00 $ 94,000.00 $94,000.00
PARK AVE $ 45,941.00 $ 45,941.00 $45,941.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0,00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
..
$0.00
Named Projects Total: $ 1,192,232.00 $ $ .:1,192,232.00 $1,192,232.00
;Total Carryover+Estimate: $ 1;192,232.00 $1;192,232.00 $1,192,232.00
(%} Named Projects: 100%
Nexus Project? FY2019-2020 Total Local Street
Estimated Total Project Cost Public DIF .Carryover. :Current Measure
Named Projects: shan't } share Funds Estimate Programmed
City of Redlands
REDLANDS BLVD $ 368,000.00 $ 368,000.00 $368,000.00
PIONEER AVE $ 165,000.00 $ 165,000.00 $165,000.00
RESERVOIR RD $ 88,500.00 $ 88,500.00 $88,500.00
CRESTVIEW DR $ 56,700.00 $ 56,700.00 $56,700.00
ORANGE TREE LN $ 43,500.00 $ 43,500.00 $43,500.00
SMILEY HEIGHTS DR $ 88,000.00 $ 88,000.00 $88,000.00
ALMOND AVE $ 39,000.00 $ 39,000.00 : $39,000.00
MARIGOLD AVE $ 46,000.00 $ 46,000.00 '$46,000.00
CAJON ST $ 65,000.00 $ 65,000.00 $65.000.00
NEW YORK ST $ 72,022.00 $ 72,022.00 $72,022.00
CITRUS AVE $ 156,000.00 $ 156,000.00 $156,000.00
ALABAMA ST $ 52,200.00 $ 52,200.00 $52200:00
$0.00
$000
$0.00
$0.00
X0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0:00
$0:00
$0:00
$0:00
$0.00
$0.00
Named Projects'Total: $ : 1,239,922.00 $ $ 1;239,922.00 $1,239,922.00
Tota[Carryover+Estimate: `$ 1;239,922.00 $1,239,922.00 $1239,922,00
(%) Named Prpjects: _ '100%