Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_88-2001AGREEMENT FOR THE PROVISION OF PROFESSIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING SERVICES This agreement for the provision of environmental consulting services (this "Agreement") is made and entered into this "thday of June, 2001, by and between the City of Redlands, a municipal corporation (hereafter "City") and Michael Brandman Associates (hereafter "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the City of Redlands and - Michael Brandman Associates hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE 1-ENGAGEMENT OF CONSULTANT 1.1. Engagement of Consultant. City hereby retains Consultant to perform professional environmental consulting services (the "Services") associated with City's preparation of an environmental impact report for its proposed sports park project (the "Project"), as described in the Project Understanding which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, upon the terms and conditions described herein. Consultant's Services shall include, but not be limited to, preparation of an environmental impact report and staff coordination of the proposed sports park located on the north side of San Bernardino Avenue between Dearborn Street and Wabash Avenue. This work shall be in accordance with the Scope of Services for the Project as shown in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Consultant shall determine the method, details and means of performing the Services, and Consultant shall perform the Services to the best of its ability and with the skill, expertise and level of competency presently maintained by other practicing professionals providing similar service in the industry. ARTICLE 2-PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1. Project Description. The proposed sports park will consist of a 115 acre site and will include fourteen socce4 fields of varying size, two basketball courts, a picnic and lawn area, a six thousand seat soccer/football stadium, four arena style soccer areas, and eight softball fields with batting cages. The softball fields will include a food service/restaurant facility. The park will also have concession stands in two locations. The project also includes an amendment to the Airport Land Use Plan for the Redlands Airport. Various related actions will be incorporated into the document including general plan amendment, zone change, and a conditional use permit, among other actions. ARTICLE 3-ADDITIONAL SERVICES 3.1. Subcontractors. Consultant may retain subconsultants and subcontractors in connection with its performance of the Services subject to the prior consent by City. The Consultant's key personnel for performance of the Services are as follows: 1 Randy A. Nichols, AICP, Project Manager Mr. Nichols will be supported by the following subconsultants; Civic Solutions, Inc., Matthew Bassi Giroux & Associates, Hans Giroux McKenna, Et AL, Jeanette McKenna Alta Enviro-Management, Robert B. Hansen Consultant agrees that these key personnel, as described more fully in Exhibit "C", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, shall be principally responsible for the performance of the Services, and that such personnel shall not be replaced without prior consent of City. Consultant further represents that these key personnel shall each expend their time performing the Services for City during the term of this Agreement as stated in Exhibit "B". 3.2. Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense during the entire term of this Agreement including any extension thereof, the following policies of insurance: (a) Comprehensive General Liability Insurance. A policy of comprehensive general liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis in an amount not Tess than either (i) a combined single limit of $1,000,000 or (ii) bodily injury limits of $1,000,000 per person, $500,000.00 per occurrence and property damage limits of $1,000,000.00 per occurrence and $2,000,000.00 in aggregate. (b) Worker's Compensation Insurance. A policy of worker's compensation insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00 or as will fully comply with the statutory requirements of the State of California and which shall indemnify, insure and provide legal defense for Consultant against any loss, claim or damage arising form any injuries or occupational diseases occurring to any worker employed by or any persons retained as an employee by Consultant in the course of carrying out the work or services contemplated in this Agreement. (c) Automotive Insurance. A policy of comprehensive automobile liability insurance written on a per occurrence basis in an amount not less than either (i) bodily injury liability limits of $500,000 per person and $1,000,000 per occurrence and property damage liability limits of $500,000.00 per occurrence and $500,000.00 in the aggregate or (ii) combined single limit liability of $500,000.00. Said policy shall include coverage for owned, non -owned, leased and hired cars. (d) Professional Liability Insurance. A policy of Professional Liability Insurance that will provide coverage in the amount not Tess than $500,000.00 per occurrence and $1,000,000.00 in the aggregate. 2 ARTICLE 4- SCHEDULE, TERMINATION AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 4.1.Schedule for Completion. Time is of the essence and the work described in Exhibit "B" shall be completed consistent with the schedule included as Exhibit "D", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. City and Consultant recognize that delays could occur for reasons outside the control of consultant. If this situation occurs, an extension of due date may be permitted by City. 4.2. Fee. In consideration for its performance of the Services, City shall pay to Consultant an amount not to exceed $172,595 in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit "E", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Payment to Consultant shall be made upon receipt of an itemized invoice describing and outlining the items for which payment is requested. Invoices shall document the status of the Services associated with the fees billed. All billings are due and payable within 30 days of the date they are mailed. 4.3. Termination. City may terminate this Agreement at any time, without cause, by prior written notice to Consultant. Upon such termination, Consultant shall deliver to City all documents, reports, materials and work of any nature pertaining to this Agreement and in the possession or under its control. In such an event, Consultant shall be paid for the work performed under this Agreement to the date of termination costs which would be strictly time and reimbursable expenses. Payment of work completed under contract to date of termination shall be made based on time and reimbursable billings as of the project termination. The total amount of this Agreement is as set forth in Paragraph 4.2. 4.4. Indemnification. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its elected officials, officers and employees from and against any and all liability arising out of, or resulting from, the intentional wrongful costs or the negligent acts and omissions of Consultant, and its employees and its agents in connection with the performance of this Agreement. 4.5. Independent Contractor. This Agreement is for professional services and does not make the employees of Consultant employees of City for the purpose of payroll deductions, unemployment insurance, or any other benefits. Consultant shall at all times retain the status of an independent contractor. 4.6. Nondiscrimination. During the performance of this Agreement,. Consultant agrees that Consultant shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation or disability, including the medical condition of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) or any condition related thereto in the selection and retention of employees and sub -consultant and the procurement of materials and equipment. 4.7. Ownership of Documents. The reports, drawings, maps and other contract documents prepared under this agreement by the Consultant shall be and remain the property of City upon compensation of Consultant for its services herein described. 3 4.8. Assignment. Neither this Agreement, nor any duties or obligations under this Agreement, shall be assigned by Consultant without prior written consent of City. Any assignment or attempted assignment without such consent shall be void and unenforceable and may, at the sole discretion of City, result in the immediate termination of this Agreement. 4.9. Attorney's Fees. In the event any action is commenced to enforce or interpret the terms or conditions of this Agreement the prevailing party shall, in addition to any costs and other relief, be entitled to the recovery of its reasonable attorney's fees. 4.10. Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either verbal or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the matters contained herein. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges and agrees that no representation, inducements, promises or agreements, verbals or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein, and that no other agreement, stipulation or promise not contained in this Agreement shall be valid or binding on either party. 4.11. Books and Records. Consultant shall maintain books and accounts of all project related costs and all expenses. Books shall be available at all reasonable times for examination by City at the office of Consultant. 4.12. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. CITY OF REDLANDS Pat Gilbreath, Mayor Attest: Lorri: Poyzer, ; Jerk Michae ndman, President Dated: June 19, 2001 Dated: C'• a•' ate/ 4 EXHIBIT A Project Understanding Redlands Sports Park The City of Redlands is considering the development of a 115-acre site for a multi -purpose outdoor sports park, on land located immediately north of San Bernardino Avenue, east of Dearborn Street (extended), west of Wabash Avenue, south of Sessums Drive and the Redlands Municipal Airport ("RMA"). The subject property was acquired by the City with local Measure "0" funds, earmarked for this purpose. Potential park facilities could include: 14 Soccer fields, of various sizes 2 Basketball courts 1 Large lawn area, with tot lots and covered picnic areas 1 6,000 seat football/soccer stadium (Lighted) 4 Arena -style soccer areas 8 Softball fields (Lighted) 2 Food service/restrooms/storage buildings to serve softball fields 2 Buildings with concession stands and men's and women's locker rooms 1 Maintenance yard and building 1 Restroom building 6 Paved, lighted parking lots arranged to serve the northwestern, southwestern, central and southeastern park areas The above list of park facilities are tentative proposals at this time, and represent the maximum intensity of park development being considered by the City. This project would also include construction of Dearborn Street, between Sessums Drive and San Bernardino Avenue, to full City improvement standards for a Collector street. This would complete the last segment of this roadway, in accordance with the General Plan Circulation Element. Abutting portions of San Bernardino Avenue, Wabash Avenue and Sessums Drive would be improved to their ultimate right-of-way width, in accordance with the City's design standards for each roadway. Underground utilities would be extended northward from San Bernardino Avenue in conjunction with the Dearborn Street construction, including water and sewer lines, and possibly electrical and natural gas lines, if needed. A storm drain was previously constructed by the City along the extended alignment of Dearborn Street. Water and sewer lines would be upgraded as part of the improvements along the San Bernardino and Wabash Avenue frontages. Please note that the sports park project cannot proceed unless the existing helicopter flight patterns at the Redlands Municipal Airport ("RMA") are moved to and restricted to the north side of the runway. Amendments to the RMA Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan ("ALUCP") are also proposed as part of this project that would shift the helicopter flight patterns to the north side and make corresponding changes to the compatibility zone designations, density limitations and hazards maps. The proposed ALUCP amendments are described below. 1 Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Amendments Currently, helicopter flights associated with the RMA are restricted to the south side of the runway, to avoid conflicts with airplane traffic that is restricted to the north side. The majority of the helicopter operations are for flight training purposes, conducted typically between 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Very few flight operations occur at night or on the weekends. The helicopter flight pattern occurs in the air space above the proposed Redlands Sports Park site; this pattern is reflected in the current Redlands Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan ("ALUCP"). Because of the noise and moderate risk involved with the helicopter flights, the ALUCP has designated land south of the airport, including the proposed sports park site, as Compatibility Zone B2. This designation limits land use activities to those that do not involve more than 90 people per acre at any time, and explicitly prohibits children's schools, day care centers and highly noise sensitive uses. Recently, the Redlands City Council decided to pursue relocation of the existing helipad that would enable relocation of the helicopter flight training pattern to the north side of the runway. This would reduce the noise and risk of air hazards on the south side accordingly. The proposed ALUCP amendments would incorporate the new north side helipad location and associated flight patterns, and change all affected maps that presently reflect the south side flight pattern of the helicopter training operations. In addition, the Primary Compatibility Criteria for Compatibility Zones B 1, B2 and C would be revised to more precisely define the manner in which the maximum number of person per acre is to be interpreted and calculated. The revised definitions would allow for an increase in the population density within these compatibility zones. Surrounding Land Uses and Environmental Setting The proposed sports park site occupies City -owned land, located totally within the incorporated limits of the City of Redlands. Wabash Avenue, which forms the eastern border of the site, is also the eastern edge of the current City limits. The project site lies on relatively flat land that slopes in an east -to -west direction and is mostly covered by a mature citrus grove that is irrigated and managed for the production of fruit. The northwestern and southwestern parts of the site are vacant, mostly bare ground, except for occasional patches of low, ruderal (weedy) vegetation. There is a remnant field of disturbed and undisturbed native grassland and low shrubby vegetation (buckwheat) bordering the northern side of the vacant land in the southwestern corner of the site. A San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District water well (San Bernardino Well No. 1) occupies a small, box -shaped, fenced area along the San Bernardino Avenue frontage, between Granite Street and Wabash Avenue. A City of Redlands water well is found within the grove, in the northwestern part of the site, and another City well is found on San Bernardino Avenue, in the southwestern corner of the site. City -owned water spreading grounds occur in the northeast portion of the project site. Surrounding land uses are identified in Table 1 below. TABLE 1 LAND USES SURROUNDING PROPOSED REDLANDS SPORTS PARK North vacant land, industrial businesses and the Redlands Municipal Airport South citrus groves and recently built and occupied single family homes East active citrus groves West citrus groves, a small single family residential subdivision and vacant land 2 The Redlands Municipal Airport ("RMA") is located on the bluff adjoining the Santa Ana Wash, between Judson Street and Wabash Avenue, adjacent to Sessums Avenue and Aviation Court. This City -owned facility is a general aviation airport, with no scheduled or planned passenger service. In 1997, the Redlands City Council adopted the ALUCP pursuant to the California State Aeronautics Act. The main purpose of this plan is to define criteria to guide planning decisions regarding future development within the airport influence area. The criteria are based on considerations of noise impacts, safety concerns, airspace protection requirements and general annoyance related to aircraft overflights. Various land use compatibility zones are defined in the plan; each has different land use and population density restrictions, intended to avoid and minimize exposure of noise sensitive uses and high concentrations of people within helicopter and other aircraft flight patterns. As noted above, the proposed sports park lies almost entirely within Compatibility Zone B2, defined in the ALUCP as an area exposed to significant noise and moderate risk (aircraft are often below 800 feet above ground level). Zone B2 was established solely because of the helicopter flight route across it, which involves flight training operations for a local helicopter pilot training business. The 1993 Airport Master Plan projected daily aircraft operations would increase from approximately 260 in 1995 to approximately 326 in 2005 and 391 in 2015. RMA has one 4,500-foot single runway, paved with asphalt, and oriented east -to -west. Airside facilities (i.e. directly associated with aircraft operations) include: taxiways, navigational aids and airport lighting. Landside facilities include terminal buildings, hangars, aircraft parking aprons, aircraft rescue and fire fighting facilities, security, fuel storage/dispensing areas and auto parking. A future helipad location on the northeast side of the runway is identified in the current master plan. Land uses presently surrounding the airport are listed below. TABLE 2 LAND USES SURROUNDING REDLANDS MUNICIPAL AIRPORT North Santa Ana Wash South Light industrial, single family homes, vacant land and citrus groves East Citrus groves, railroad tracks West Santa Ana Wash, vacant land, citrus groves City and Other Public Agency Approvals The City of Redlands will be the Lead Agency for this project's environmental impact review process, because several discretionary actions would need to be approved by the Redlands City Council, as follows. 1. Amendments to the ALUCP helicopter flight patterns, Compatibility Zone designations, Primary Compatibility Criteria, and Map of Noise Concerns 2. General Plan Amendment, to change the current designation of the westernmost citrus grove area within the proposed sports park site from "Agriculture -City Grove" to "Parks." 3. Zone Change, to re -zone the entire sports park site as "0" (Open Space). 4. Ordinance Text Amendment, to increase the maximum building height in the Open Space Zone. The proposed stadium and possibly fencing around the softball fields would exceed the existing 15-feet height limit. 5. General Plan Amendment, to realign the Dearborn Street extension in accordance with the alignment shown in the proposed sports park site plan. 6. Conditional Use Permit, to define the development plan and design and operational features that will govern the implementation of the sports park development program. 7. Award of a contract for construction of the sports park 3 8. Award of (a) contract(s) to construct water facilities to serve the sports park The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) may be a Responsible Agency as defined in Section 15381 of the State CEQA Guidelines, and will be requested to review and comment on the proposed ALUCP amendments. At this time, no other public agency approvals have been identified that are required to allow these projects to proceed. 4 EXHIBIT B SCOPE OF SERVICES Michael Brandman Associates (MBA) will provide the following service to complete the EIR process. Task 1: Prepare Revised Initial Study and Notice of Preparation (NOP) MBA will prepare revisions to the first draft Initial Study to incorporate description and analyses of the proposed Redlands Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Amendments ("ALUCPA"). The Notice of Preparation required under Section 15082 of the State CEQA Guidelines will also be revised to add this element to the project description. MBA will produce and submit one reproducible version of the NOP/IS to the City, who will distribute it via certified mail to responsible and interested and public and quasi -public agencies, local property owners, and other persons and special interest groups as specified by City staff. City staff (or the Consulting Project Coordinator) will be responsible for preparation and publication of a newspaper notice to announce the release of the NOP and the dates of the 30-day comment period. Optional Task: Public Scoping Meeting If requested, MBA will assist the City in organizing, announcing and conducting a public meeting to present the proposed project and to obtain comments concerning the environmental impact issues to be addressed in the EIR. This optional task is not included in this scope of work or in the accompanying budget. Deliverables • One Notice of Preparation • Three (3) screencheck draft Revised Initial Studies for City staff review/comment. • One reproducible version of the City -approved, Revised Initial Study • One copy of a hazardous materials sites database search report Task 2: Prepare Screencheck Draft EIR MBA will prepare an EIR to address the key environmental issues of concern and will include all elements required by the State CEQA Guidelines, in Article 9, Sections 15120 through 15131. Information and analyses to be provided in each EIR section are summarized below. Introduction and Executive Summary A brief summary of the proposed project characteristics will be presented and the purpose and intent of this project -level EIR will be explained. A matrix -style summary of the conclusions of the main body of the EIR will be presented, relative to project and cumulative impacts, recommended mitigation measures and level of impact significance remaining after incorporation of mitigation measures. Alternatives considered will be summarized, including identification of the environmentally superior alternative, any areas of known controversy will be identified and any environmental issues remaining to be resolved will be listed. 1 Project Description Information in this section will be derived primarily from the project application plans and materials provided by the City staff. This section will include: • Name, address and phone number of project applicant • Name, address and phone number of Lead Agency (City) representative • Project Location — regional location, site location and boundaries (text and maps) • Statement of Project Objectives -- applicant's development objectives and City planning goals and policies • Project Characteristics — text and illustrations describing the sports park land use and design concepts, development intensity, proposed parking, infrastructure, grading and excavation requirements, anticipated phasing, public/private partnerships, environmental mitigation strategies, etc. Text and illustrations will also be provided to describe the proposed ALUCPA. • Intended Uses of the EIR — identification of Lead and Responsible Agencies and the approvals for which this EIR is expected to be reviewed by those agencies. A draft project description will be submitted to City staff for review and approval to ensure that the environmental impact analyses accurately and fully address the complete scope of the project, at the appropriate level of detail. Deliverables • Three copies of a draft Project Description, including illustrations Environmental Setting This section of the EIR will generally describe the baseline physical conditions and relevant regional and local plans and programs that are pertinent to this project's environmental impact analysis. A brief history of land uses conducted at the project site will be presented. The physical environment that exists on and surrounding the project site will be textually described and illustrated. Environmental sensitivities identified during preparation of the Initial Study and public scoping process will be noted, e.g., any local utilities that are known to be damaged or over -capacity, local streets that are frequently congested beyond the City's level of service standards, sensitive nearby land uses, seismic or flood hazards, etc. Project (in)consistency with applicable local and regional plans will be briefly discussed. The reader will be referred to the relevant EIR section, where appropriate, for a more detailed analysis of project/plan consistency. It is anticipated that plans to be discussed will include the Redlands General Plan, Redlands Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, regional air quality attainment plan, and the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Plan. Environmental Impact Analysis and Recommended Mitigation Measures This section of the EIR will present findings and recommendations regarding project -level and cumulative environmental impacts. The emphasis will be on the identification of significant impacts that would result from project implementation. Impact significance will be determined by defining the changes to the existing environment that would result from project implementation and comparing that changed environmental condition to a standard or threshold of significance. Impacts will be evaluated in proportion to their severity and probability of occurrence. Thresholds of significance will be based on any such standards that have been officially adopted by the City or other public agencies with primary 2 authority relative to the impact in question. Thresholds may also include standards that are regularly applied in the review of major development projects by the City, standards developed by the City and MBA specifically for this project, and/or those thresholds set forth in the Initial Study Checklist contained in the current State CEQA Guidelines. If the proposed project incorporates specific design or implementation measures intended to mitigate potentially significant environmental effects, such measures will be noted and an assessment of the project's "net impact significance" following implementation of the applicant's proposed mitigation measures will be made. Where impacts are found to be significant, MBA will develop measures to mitigate such effects to below a level of significance, if feasible. All recommended mitigation measures will be defined to represent a close nexus between the measure and a legitimate governmental interest, and will be directly proportional to the level of impact resulting from the project. Our approach to the analysis of each of the primary environmental impact topics currently anticipated for this project is presented in the following pages. Please note that this preliminary range of topics may need to be altered as a result of the EIR scoping process. Aesthetics (Light and Glare) Since the proposed project includes a variety of play fields that will be active and lighted, an assessment of potential adverse impacts due to night lighting is warranted. Light spillage that extends beyond the park boundaries could interfere with motorists' visibility along adjoining streets, could negatively impact nearby residential uses, and may also adversely affect navigational aids at the nearby Redlands Municipal Airport. MBA will consult with City staff and the private development entity to develop a conceptual description of the outdoor lighting system(s) to be utilized on site, and to identify the illumination criteria to be satisfied by the lighting plan. It is assumed that the City will provide sufficient information concerning the lighting system requirements and estimated illumination levels at the site boundaries, for the purpose of this EIR. Performance standards to prevent significant light and glare impacts will be defined that can be incorporated into the precise lighting plans and evaluated by City staff at the plan check stage. Agricultural Resources Conversion of the western -most grove area to sports park uses, as proposed, would conflict with the Redlands General Plan and would result in a loss of Unique Farmland, as mapped by the California Department of Conservation. These are considered potentially significant impacts with respect to loss of farmland. The remaining grove area is irrigated and is managed for the commercial production of oranges. Although this area is zoned for Agricultural uses, the Redlands General Plan designates this land for Parks/Golf Courses. Development of sports park uses on that land, therefore, would be consistent with the General Plan, but would result in a loss of irrigated cropland that is classified as Unique Farmland by the California Department of Conservation. The EIR will assess the impact of the loss of the existing citrus groves with respect to Redlands General Plan policies, and with respect to the conversion of Unique Farmland to an active park use. Air Quality Based on technical analyses to be conducted by Giroux & Associates, MBA will prepare an assessment of short-term, construction impacts and long-term, operational impacts. Construction impacts include fugitive dust, exhaust emissions from heavy equipment, machinery, trucks and work crew vehicles, and fumes associated with paving and application of exterior structural coatings (i.e., paints, water proofing 3 agents, asphalt, etc.). According to Mr. Mutter, this project will likely result in an excess of grading materials that will need to be hauled by truck to a currently unknown location. Emissions from those truck trips will need to be evaluated as part of the construction impact assessment. Long-term impacts to be addressed include daily and peak period exhaust emissions generated by vehicles entering and leaving the site; and indirect emissions at electrical and natural gas generation facilities that would supply these power sources to the developed project site. Impact significance will be assessed in accordance with significance thresholds recommended by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, proximity of sensitive receptors and applicable City General Plan policies. Calculations of construction -related emissions will be based upon construction program details to be provided by the City and on existing and projected traffic volume data to be developed by WPA Traffic Engineering. A microscale screening analysis will be performed to determine whether federal or state one -hour standards for carbon monoxide pollutant would be exceeded during full capacity events at the football/soccer stadium or other heavy attendance time periods. Biological Resources The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's proposed critical habitat area for the federally endangered San Bernardino kangaroo rat ("SBKR") extends into portions of the Redlands Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan area, including the northwestern corner of the proposed sports park site. A biological survey will be conducted to fully inventory the variety of vegetation communities and wildlife habitat that occur in the project planning area, and to conduct federal protocol surveys in the limited area where potential habitat for the SBKR may occur (Santa Ana Wash area, north of the airport and open fields south of the airport). SBKR protocol surveys require eight consecutive nights of trapping. This scope of work and budget will cover up to 400 traps/night. A stand-alone report will be prepared to describe the biological resources and any sensitive habitat or species identified during the biological surveys, assess impacts to the SBKR and other federal or state -listed species or other protected habitat found within impacted areas, and list measures to avoid or mitigate any potentially significant impacts. A section will be added to the EIR to summarize the results of the biology report, which will be appended to the EIR. Mr. Greg Miller, Senior Scientist, will lead the surveys and will be responsible for the final report. Mr. Miller holds U.S.F.W.S. permit TE834488-2, which allows him to capture and release the SBKR. Cultural Resources Based on their recent "overview" level assessment of the Santa Ana River watershed for the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, McKenna et al. Found that there are numerous archaeological sites in the general area. This proposal, therefore, includes preparation of complete Phase I Cultural Resources Survey Report by McKenna. Their tasks will include: (1) an archaeological records check at the San Bernardino County Museum; (2) limited historical research, including City, County and BLM files; (3) Native American consultation; (4) Field survey; and (5) report preparation. MBA will summarize the results of that report in this section of the EIR and the complete report will be appended to the EIR. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The proposed sports park would not be permitted under the existing land use compatibility criteria set forth in the Redlands Municipal Airport, because it would exceed the population density restrictions within the area south of the airport runway that is exposed to moderate air traffic hazards associated with helicopter overflights. The City Council is considering amendments to the existing ALUCP that would relocate the existing helicopter pad from the south side to the north side of the runway, and to restrict all helicopter flights to the north side. This would allow for amendments to the compatibility zones and density restrictions and would allow for development of higher intensity land uses such as the proposed 4 sports park. The City has retained Shutt Moen Associates to evaluate alternative helicopter flight patterns and corresponding effects on the ALUCP policies and land use standards, and to make recommendations to prevent significant air traffic hazards and avoid surrounding land use/airport conflicts. MBA will summarize the results of the Shutt Moen study in this section of the EIR. The complete report will be appended to the EIR. It is known that a variety of hazardous chemicals now prohibited or rigorously restricted were routinely used in earlier periods of the citrus industry. One example is DBCP (dibromochloropropane), a syrupy toxin, that was routinely added to citrus irrigation water over 30 years ago, for treatment of nematodes, an elongated, cylindrical worm that is parasitic to citrus tree root systems. Other hazardous materials may also have been applied or accidentally spilled in the grove area, such as pesticides and possibly other wastes that were associated with previous land use activities. Additional information concerning the presence or potential presence of soil contaminants will be compiled as part of the EIR, to determine the scope and magnitude of contamination that might be present, and to identify the scope of clean-up efforts that might be required. This information will be helpful in the City's evaluations concerning the design and development of the sports park. ALTA ENVIRO-MANAGEMENT (AEM) will conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) to evaluate the sports park property history, in an effort to screen out areas of no concern versus areas where focused investigations are warranted. AEM will then conduct soil testing, arrange for laboratory analysis of the samples and prepare a report of findings and recommendations concerning estimated extent of contamination (if any) and approaches to remediation. Soil samples will be collected with a hand auger at approximately 60 locations throughout the site, at depths of approximately 6-12 inches. Up to 30 samples will be tested for organochlorine pesticides, in accordance with EPA method 8081A, up to 30 samples for arsenic, up to 15 samples for CAM 17 metals and up to 15 samples for lead, in accordance with EPA method 6010B. MBA will hire and coordinate with AEM and will summarize the results of their investigations and recommendations in the EIR. Hydrology/Water Quality The water source to satisfy the estimated two million-gallons/day irrigation demand of the sports park has not been identified. Use of the City's potable water supply would have a significant impact with respect to the City's water resource management program. The EIR will, therefore, evaluate alternative sources of irrigation water supply, determine whether new water storage and/or transmission facilities would be needed to provide irrigation water, and assess the environmental impacts associated with the supply and delivery of irrigation water for the sports park. It is assumed that the evaluation of alternative water sources and transmission facilities needs will be conducted by the City's Municipal Utilities Department and provided to MBA for incorporation into the EIR. Land Use The preliminary site plan for the proposed sports park would result in removal of the remaining part of the City Grove along the western edge of the site, and would conflict with the existing General Plan land use designation for that area, which is "Agriculture -City Grove." This project includes an amendment to the Redlands General Plan to change the land use designation for that area to "Parks." Further assessment of this proposed general plan amendment will be conducted to determine whether this would result in a significant conflict with City policies governing citrus grove preservation. In addition, the proposed alignment of Dearborn Street along the western edge of the sports park is east of the alignment currently shown in the Redlands General Plan. Further analysis of this general plan amendment will also be conducted as part of the EIR. Finally, the proposed amendments to the ALUCPA will be examined with respect to potential conflicts or consistency with the Redlands General Plan. 5 Noise Short-term construction related impacts are normally mitigated to a less than significant level through compliance with local noise control ordinances that restrict the hours and days of operations to the least intrusive times of the day and week. This proposal assumes that construction noise impacts will be adequately addressed within the Initial Stud and will not require further analysis in the EIR. Giroux & Associates will prepare a noise study to determine whether the proposed activities at the park would generate adverse noise levels at nearby residential or other noise sensitive areas. Noise levels generated by the types of outdoor athletic facilities included in the proposed project will be estimated on the basis of noise measurements taken by Giroux at similar facilities over the last few years. The measured data will be used as the basis for projecting future noise levels at affected noise sensitive areas. Noise associated with outdoor speakers will be based on project speaker design information. Potential traffic noise impacts affecting noise sensitive receivers along the roadways that would carry the most project -related traffic will also be evaluated. Existing and with -project roadway noise will be modeled on the basis of traffic volumes, posted speeds and vehicle mix data to be provided by the City's traffic consultant. The increase in noise associated with the additional traffic will be determined and potential noise impacts identified. The noise will be compared to the City's noise criteria to determine potential noise impacts. If significant noise impacts are projected, mitigation measures will be identified. MBA will summarize the results of the Noise Study in this section of the EIR. The complete report will be appended to the EIR. Transportation/Traffic MBA will summarize the results of the traffic, circulation and parking analysis to be prepared by WPA Traffic Engineering, under separate contract to the City. The complete WPA report will be appended to features. Utilities/Service Systems Based on our preliminary conversation with City engineering staff, it appears that the City's existing water, sewer and storm drainage systems have adequate capacity to accommodate the increased average demand that would result from development and operation of the proposed sports park complex. A new storm drain was recently completed adjacent to the project site that connects to an existing storm drain in Aviation Way. This new storm drain has been sized sufficiently to handle the additional runoff from the proposed park site. Additional analysis will be conducted to determine whether existing water and sewer facilities are adequate to support peak demands that could substantially exceed "average" demands, such as during a full capacity event in the proposed soccer/football stadium. A conceptual plan for on- and off - site water, sewer and storm drainage facilities has not been prepared, therefore, further analysis will also be conducted to determine whether any significant construction impacts could occur in connection with off -site potable water and sewer facilities that may be required to meet peak sports park demands. It is assumed that the City's Municipal Utilities and Public Works Departments will assess the need for any upgrades to existing water or sewer facilities to meet peak sports park demands. The results of this assessment will be provided to MBA for incorporation into the EIR. Cumulative Impacts This section will present a concise discussion of the combined impacts resulting from the implementation of the proposed project, together with other past, present and reasonably foreseeable future projects 6 causing related impacts. MBA will work with City staff to develop appropriate lists of related projects, and to obtain copies of planning documents that identify relevant growth projections and contain pertinent assessments of cumulative impacts to which this project will contribute. The impact analysis will focus on the project's contribution to any estimated significant cumulative impacts; mitigation measures will also focus on the project's contribution to overall solutions. This section will also note where the project's incremental effect would not be cumulatively considerable because of mandatory participation in a funding or other mitigation program designed to alleviate the cumulative impact. If the project's contribution to a significant impact is so minor that the environmental conditions would essentially be the same with or without the project, this will also be noted. Growth Inducing Impacts Ways in which the project could induce development of neighboring lands, direct or indirect population or economic growth or the construction of additional housing will be examined. Factors to be examined include extension of or major upgrades to necessary utilities and other infrastructure that would also remove development constraints for nearby properties; establishment of potential precedent setting governmental actions relative to allowable development intensities; amendments to local regulations that involve relaxation of certain planning or construction standards; substantial increase in long-term employment opportunities that could attract new residents as well as new businesses that support or compliment new businesses developed at the project site. Effects Not Found to Be Significant As required under Section 15128 of the CEQA Guidelines, this section of the EIR will briefly cite the reasons that various possible significant effects of the project were determined not to be significant and not analyzed within the EIR. This section will summarize the findings of the Initial Study and public scoping process and will refer the reader to the Appendix materials that contain the final Initial Study and other documentation concerning the scoping process. Alternatives to the Proposed Project The purpose of this EIR section is to define and evaluate potential alternative project scenarios that would avoid or reduce one or more of the significant environmental impacts that would result from the proposed project. Potential alternative project concepts that could be evaluated include alternative land use mixes and intensities, modified design concepts and/or a different site. A No -Project Alternative will also be examined, pursuant to Section 15126.6(e) of the CEQA Guidelines. This will be based on reasonable assumptions developed in consultation with City staff as to what land use scenarios are likely to occur if the proposed project is not approved, based on current plans and consistent with available infrastructure and community services. MBA will consult with City staff to define an appropriate range of alternatives that would avoid or mitigate those impacts found to be significant, and particularly to reduce or avoid any significant impacts that cannot be avoided if the proposed project is approved. A rationale for each alternative will be presented, including a discussion of the impacts it is intended to reduce or avoid, and an explanation of how the alternative implements or fails to implement the project objectives. Please note that the budget for this task assumes analysis of up to three alternatives, in a qualitative and comparative manner. Following a succinct narrative that compares the environmental impacts of each alternative with those of the proposed project, the comparisons will be summarized in a matrix format, for the reader's convenience. The environmentally superior alternative will then be identified. If it is the No -Project Alternative, an environmentally superior "project" alternative will also be identified. 7 Report Preparation Resources This section will consist of three elements, as follows. Organizations and Persons Contacted All persons and organizations consulted with or from whom information was obtained during preparation of this EIR will be identified. EIR Preparation Staff The key City staff members responsible for managing the EIR process will be identified, along with the key members of the Environmental Consultant team and the key consultants for the project applicant, including a one -sentence summary of their professional experience and their roles in the EIR process. Bibliography All documents, maps and other information materials cited as references or otherwise used as an information source during preparation of the EIR will be listed. Appendix The Appendix will include the following: • NOP and responses to the NOP • Initial Study • Biological Resources Report • Traffic study and air traffic hazards report prepared by the City's other consultants • Cultural Resources technical report • Calculations and computer model assumptions utilized in the noise and air quality studies • Phase I ESA and Findings and Recommendations Based on Soils Tests The appendix will be bound separately from the Draft EIR, to reduce the bulk of the main document, and also to facilitate selective distribution of those reports to those who have some statutory authority relative to the subject matter or to those with a special interest. The appendix will contain the following and possibly other elements. Deliverables • Three (3) copies of a Screencheck Draft EIR • Three (3) copies of a Screencheck Draft Appendix Task 3: Respond to City Staff Comments, Prepare Revised Screencheck Draft EIR for Approval by City's Environmental Review Committee After receipt of all City staff comments on the screencheck document, MBA will make any necessary revisions and submit a revised screencheck document for review and approval by the City's Environmental Review Committee (ERC). 8 Deliverables • Ten (10) copies of a 2nd Screencheck Draft EIR, with five sets of the appendix Task 4: Revise per ERC Comments, Produce and Distribute Notice of Completion and Draft EIR MBA will revise the EIR in accordance with the direction of the City's ERC and will then produce and submit the required number of copies of the public review Draft EIR and Notice of Completion (NOC) form to City staff. Based on direction provided in the attachment to the RFP, it is assumed that the City will be responsible for mailing copies of the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse and to other public agencies, persons and groups included on this project's distribution list. (This task could also be assigned to the consulting Project Coordinator, at the City's option.) The document will be circulated for a 45-day review and comment period. Technical appendix will not be distributed with the Draft EIRs, due to the added bulk and expense and the expectation that very few recipients would need or be interested in that information. A transmittal will be sent with all Draft EIRs that will indicate how and where copies of Appendix materials can be purchased, if desired. Deliverables • The number of copies of the Draft EIR that will be needed is not known at this time; this proposal assumes that up to 30 copies of the Draft EIR and the 10 copies of the Appendix will be provided. MBA will also provide one digital copy of the Draft EIR document and one unbound, reproducible version for use by City staff, as needed. Task 5: Prepare Preliminary Responses to Comments (RTC), Screencheck Final EIR (FEIR), and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) Immediately following the end of the 45-day public review period, MBA will prepare written responses to all comments received concerning the adequacy of the Draft EIR, to be included in a screencheck Final EIR. The Final EIR will incorporate the Draft EIR by reference and will include an introduction section, copies of all comments received on the Draft EIR, written responses to those comments, and a section containing any minor clarifications, corrections or revisions to the Draft EIR that may be determined to be necessary as a result of one or more comments. Since it is impossible to predict the number and complexity of comments that will need to be responded to, a budget limit has been established for this task. If less effort is required, the City will be billed only for the time and expenses actually involved. If more effort is required, MBA will notify the City and obtain authorization to exceed the budget limit or to make other provisions to complete this task within this limit. Pursuant to Section 15097 of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) will be prepared to define the roles, responsibilities, timing and methods of monitoring and ensuring successful completion of all mitigation measures included in the Final EIR. Deliverables • Three (3) copies of a screencheck Final EIR and three copies of a screencheck MMRP. Task 6: Prepare Final EIR and Final MMRP for Action by Lead Agency MBA will revise the Final EIR and MMRP in accordance with City staff comments and then produce the required number of copies of these documents to be distributed to the City's Planning Commission, for review and recommendation to the City Council. MBA will make revisions to either or both documents, 9 if directed by the Planning Commission, and will provide City staff with the required number of copies for City Council review and approval. Following the Council's certification of the Final EIR and MMRP, MBA will make any final revisions, if required by the Council. Deliverables • One unbound, reproducible version of the Final EIR and the MMRP, one digital copy of each, and 20 bound copies of the Final EIR and MMRP for Planning Commission review. • One unbound, reproducible version of the Final EIR and the MMRP, one digital copy of each, and 20 bound copies of the Final EIR and MMRP for City Council review. • If any final revisions are required by the City Council, MBA will provide one unbound, reproducible version of the Council -certified Final EIR and the MMRP, and one digital copy of each. Task 7: Attend Meetings and Public Hearings The MBA project manager and the Project Coordinator will attend meetings with City staff and will also attend public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. We will be prepared to present EIR findings and to answer questions regarding the project and the EIR. This proposal assumes attendance by the MBA project manager at three meetings with City staff, one meeting with the City's ERC, two public hearings before the City Planning Commission and one public hearing before the City Council. Our proposed budget allocates three hours per meeting attended by the EIR project manager. It is further assumed that the Project Coordinator will be requested to attend five meetings with City staff and two public hearings. An average of three hours per meeting is included in the proposed budget for attendance by the Project Coordinator. Travel and meal expenses associated with attending meetings and hearings will be billed on a time and expenses basis. Task 8: Project Management Throughout the environmental review process, MBA will exercise project management oversight and facilitate communications between our project team, the City and their consultants to successfully achieve project objectives for schedule, budget and product quality. This will involve coordination and supervision of the consultant team, development of and revisions to schedules, agendas, notices, memos, staff reports and other communications, and formulation of strategies concerning analytical and process issues, communications protocols, preparing for meetings and hearings and general problem -solving. Quality assurance and CEQA compliance review are management tasks that are also included in this scope of services. Project Coordinator Tasks As requested in the City's RFP, this scope of services includes various duties to be performed by a Project Coordinator, as an extension of City staff. MBA will hire Civic Solutions, Inc., a local government planning services specialist, to fulfill these duties. Tasks are expected to include, but may not be limited to, the following: • Prepare, publish and distribute notices, newspaper ads and documents • Prepare staff reports, resolutions and various forms of written correspondence and oral communications • Prepare CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations (if necessary) 10 • Work with City staff and their private partner team on design, financing, and community issues • Make presentations at public meetings and hearings • Manage Conditional Use Permit and Airport Land Use Plan Amendment processes 11 EXHIBIT C CIVIC SOLUTIONS, INC. Project Coordinator Civic Solutions, Inc. is a community development consulting firm providing comprehensive planning and entitlement project management services to municipalities, special districts and other public agencies. The firm is established around the principle that community planning and development ultimately serve the public interest. Civic Solutions, Inc. is staffed by experienced professionals who have an extensive background in public sector service. The team has a proven history of working together to serve municipal planning agencies and citizen groups. The firm presently has on -call municipal planning services contracts with the cities of Ontario, Brea, Irvine, Huntington Beach, Rancho Santa Margarita, Norwalk, Bellflower, Imperial Beach, San Gabriel and San Clemente. Led by Principal Tom Merrell, AICP and guided by the company philosophy that planning is for people, Civic Solutions is ideally equipped to successfully complete community development projects to the satisfaction of our clients and the communities they serve. A. complete description of services and client projects can be found on the firm's web site at www.civicsolutions.com. Key Personnel The project coordinator will be Matthew Bassi, Senior Planner. Mr. Bassi is accomplished in his knowledge of municipal planning, zoning and development laws, state (CEQA) and federal (NEPA) environmental regulations, and municipal code standards. He is skilled in preparing resolutions and ordinances in addition to plan checking construction and landscape plans. His previous experience includes management of the City of Chino's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, management of the preparation of a 54-acre downtown revitalization mater plan, and contract management for the preparation of General Plan projects. Mr. Bassi has worked on a variety of long- range planning assignments such as General Plan elements, specific plans, and zoning ordinance and specific plan amendments. Mr. Bassi is currently responsible for the firm's Ontario office and supervises project management for the firm's contract with the City of Ontario. He will have the resources and staff of Civic Solutions, Inc. to support his role in this contract. GIROUX & ASSOCIATES Air Quality and Noise Impact Studies Giroux & Associates (G&A) has been providing aerometric assessment services (air quality, acoustics, meteorology, airborne hazards/toxics and airborne nuisance such as dust and odors) for over twenty (20) years. Within the last two decades, the firm has participated in over 1,500 environmental investigations. Specialized services include ambient pollution and noise monitoring, computerized air pollution and noise dispersion modeling, emissions source testing, inert tracer gas field studies, APCD/AQMD permit preparation and processing, expert witness testimony and regulatory agency liaison. Giroux has developed a considerable database of information concerning noise levels and air quality impacts generated at outdoor recreation facilities. Representative project experience includes: • Municipal Swim Stadium Relocation, Santa Monica • McPherson Sports Complex, Orange • Parks & Open Space Master Plan EIR, Santa Monica 1 • Prospect Park Sports Complex, Orange • Kennedy Community Park Sports Complex, Napa • Shadow Run Skate Park Noise Study, West Covina • Belmont Park Expansion, Orange • Jack Bulik Sports Park Expansion, Fontana • Chapparosa Sports Park Lighting Impact, Laguna Niguel • Central High School Football Stadium EIR, Fresno MCKENNA, ET A.L Cultural and Paleontological Resources Assessment McKenna et al., established in 1989, is a Women Business Enterprise (WBE) firm owned and operated by Jeanette A. McKenna, M.A. and Principal Investigator, and recognized by the State of California as a Small Business/Sole Proprietorship. Ms. McKenna has over 20 years of experience with an emphasis in Cultural Resource Management (CRM) and holds certifications from the Society of Professional Archaeologists (SOPA) in Field (prehistoric) and Historic Archaeology. Ms. McKenna served on the SOPA Board of Directors from 1993 to 1997 and is currently listed as a Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA). Ms. McKenna has taken post -graduate courses in Archaeology, History, and Land Use Planning at both Arizona State University and the University of California, Riverside. McKenna et al. employs an "applied archaeological approach" in documenting and reporting on cultural resources. This approach emphasizes a balance between practical planning and the management of resources while maintaining a project -specific approach to costs and schedules. McKenna et al. maintains a professional staff capable of handling all levels of cultural resource investigations, including Prehistoric and Historic Archaeology, Rock Art studies, Historic Architectural Studies, general histories, peer reviews, and EIR/EIS documentation. McKenna et al. also has staff with expertise in analysis and report preparation. The McKenna et al. main office is located in Whittier, California (see below), providing both office and laboratory facilities. These facilities provide in-house research and analysis, house specialized field equipment, data management systems, and a relatively extensive library and archives. A few examples of her extensive similar project experience are listed below. • Principal Investigator/Project Manager, General Cultural Resources Overview for the Proposed SBVMWD Improvements Project Area, San Bernardino, California. (McKenna et al. 494) • Principal Investigator/Project Manager, Class III Investigations for the Proposed Big Bear Zoo Relocation, Fawnskin, San Bernardino County, California. (McKenna et al. 503) • Principal Investigator/Project Manager, 80 Acre Archaeological Survey in San Bernardino County, California. (McKenna et al. 525) • Principal Investigator/Project Manager, Responses to Letters, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, San Bernardino County, California. (McKenna et al. 532) • Principal Investigator/Project Manager, Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring Program for the Oak Valley Estates Property, Beaumont, Riverside County, California. (McKenna et al. 515) 2 Expert Environmental Solutions 8300 Utica Avenue, 3rd Floor • Rancho Cucanwnp, California 91730 • (909) 476-2120 • Fax (909) 476-6819 SUMMARY OF QUALIFICATIONS ALTA ENVIRO-MANAGEMENT (AEM) has been providing environmental consulting services throughout Southern California for more than 10 years. CAPABILITIES Our capabilities include the following: Phase I Environmental Assessments Underground Storage Tank (UST) Management California UST Clean-up Fund Services Soil & Groundwater Assessments Soil & Groundwater Remediation Hazardous Substances Management Various Other Hazardous Substance Related Services CLIENT REFERENCES A few client references include: Crown Realty d, Development, Inc. Mr. Robert Flaxman, President 18201 Von Karmen Ave. Newport Beach, CA 92612 (949) 476-2200 Walters Mercedes Ben/Porsche Dealer Mr. Steve Kienle, Owner Mr. Augie Cespedes, Service Manager 3210 Adams/Auto Center Drive Riverside, CA 92504 (909) 888-3332 INSURANCE COVERAGE Workmans' Compensation Includes: Occupational Disease Employers' Liability Comprehensive General Liability Professional Liabilitt( PROJECT III(ANAGER );Uwanda School District Ms. Melinda Colgrove, Risk Management P.O. Box 248 Etiwanda, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 Whittler City School District Ms, Rita Dixon, Asst. Superintendent 7211 S. Whittier Ave. Whittier, CA 90602 (562) 789-3000 xt 3073 Statutory $3,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $1,000,000.00 The Project Environmental Scientist overseeing the investigation would be Mr. Robert B. Hansen, a graduate of the University of Southern Califomia, and a licensed geologist in California. Arizona, Oregon and Idaho. Mr. Hansen has over 15 years of focused experience with Phase I, 11 and III environmental investigations. Mr. Hansen is also a California Registered Environmental Assessor (REA), Class I & 1I. A copy of Mr. Hansens resume is attached. ROBERT B. HANSEN Senior Project Env. Geologist Subsurface Soil/Groundwater Invest. UST Management Phase I Environmental Assessments Hazardous Materials Management Regulatory Permitting/Interfacing EDUCATION University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California: B.S., Geological Sciences. University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California: Haz. Mat Management Certified. REGISTRATIONSICERTIFICATIONS State of California Registered Geologist (RG) State of California Registered Environmental Assessor, Class II (REA-II) State of Arizona Registered Geologist (RG) State of Idaho Registered Professional Geologist (PG) National Registered Environmental Manager (REM) Certified Hazardous Materials Manager OSHA HAZWOPER Training PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Hansen provides experience and innovation in the field of subsurface soil and groundwater investigations. He has also consulted with various clients on issues of hazardous materials management and potential environmental liabilities as they relate to real property transfers, His strong technical skills and routine interaction with numerous regulatory agencies have developed his strength as an effective regulatory negotiator. Mr. Hansen has prepared and implemented numerous underground storage tank management plans, many of which have involved tank removal or abandonment, tank upgrades, and the assessment of releases to soil and/or groundwater. (Continued on next page) AEM ALTA FNVIRO MANAGEMENT Mr. Hansen has overseen numerous investigations involving releases of petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, volatile organic compounds, heavy metals and many other types of chemical contaminants. In addition, he has performed various groundwater investigations under the supervision of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. Mr. Hansen has been involved with the design and implementation of various soil and groundwater remediation systems including: soil vapor extraction systems, soil bioremediation, soil excavation and disposal/treatment/recycling, free-floating petroleum hydrocarbon fuel recovery and groundwater extraction and treatment. Mr. Hansen utilizes his technical skills, regulatory knowledge and innovative style to select cost effective options/technology for hazardous substance issues. PROFESSIONAL HISTORY ALTA Enviro-Management, Rancho Cucamonga,CA, Principal Environmental Geologist, 1990 to date ATC Consultants (formerly Applied Geosciences Inc.), Tustin, CA, Project Geologist, 1988-1990. Hydro -Fluent, Inc., Anaheim, CA, Staff/Senior Staff Geologist, 1985-1988. United States Geological Survey, Boulder, CO, Mapping Geologist, 1985. Unocal, Santa Paula, California, Engineering Assistant, 1984. AFFILIATIONS Association of Groundwater Scientists and Engineers National Water Well Association Association of Hazardous Materials Professionals Environmental Professionals Organization AEM Al TA ENVIRO- MANAGEMENT ID 0 1 2 3 4 5 e 7 8 0 10 11 12 13 Task Name Revised IS/NOP submitted to City City provides comments to NBA MBA submits public review IS/NOP Start Finish Thu 0/7/01 Thu 6/7/01 Mon 0/11/01 Mon 6/11/01 Thu 6/14/01 Thu 6/14/01 City publishes/distributes NOP Fri 6/15/01 Fri 8/15/01 NOP 30-day Public Review Period City Council Amends EIR Contract Prepare Draft EIR City provides Traffic Study to MBA City provides Airport Land Use/Safety Study to MBA City provides water supply and transmission info to MBA 14 15 10 17 18 19 3 Mon 6/18/01 Wed 7/18/01 Tue 6/19/01 Tue 0/19/01 Wed 8/13/01 Fri 8110/01 Wed 6/13/01 Wed 6/13/01 Fri 6/29/01 Fri 0/29/01 Mon 8/18/01 Fri 7/0/01 Cultural Resources Study Completed Mon 6/25/01 Fri 7/13/01 Air Quality and Noise Studies Completed Mon 6/18/01 Fri 7/13/01 Park Lighting Plan and Information provided to MBA San Bemardino K-Rat Surveys and Biology Report Complete DBCP Sampling and Recommendations Completed Mon 7/2/01 Mon 7/2/01 Mon 0/25/01 Fri 7/20/01 Mon 8/25/01 Fri 7/13/01 Screencheck Draft EIR Sections submitted for City Review Mon 7/10/01 Wed 8/1/01 City comments provided to MBA Mon 7/23/01 Mon 8/8/01 Draft EIR finalized, copies made and distributed Mon 8/8/01 Fri 8/10/01 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 45-Day Public Review and Comment Period Mon 8/13/01 Thu 0/27/01 Prepare Final EIR and Related Certification Materials Mon 9/17101 Fri 10/12/01 Prepare Responses to Comments (RTC) on Draft EIR Mon 9/17/01 Prepare Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Mon 9/17/01 Mon 10/1/01 Fri 9/21/01 Prepare Revisions to Draft EIR Thu 0/27/01 Prepare Draft Findings and Statement of Overriding Consid. Thu 9/27/01 Wed 10/3/01 Wed 10/3/01 Last City Staff comments provided to MBA Mon 10/8/01 Mon 10/8/01 Final EIR Materials Completed Fri 10/12/01 Fri 10/12/01 Provide RTC to Public Agencies 10 days prior to FEIR Hearing Mon 0/24/01 Fri 10/5/01 City Council Public Hearing to Certify Final EIR Tue 10/10/01 Tue 10/10/01 e 6/3 8/10 0/17 • en _114 ♦a/19 ♦ W/29 7/2 oil Best Case EIR Schedule Redlands Sports Park and Airport Land Use Plan Amendment July August September October 9/30 ♦ 10/8 ♦ 10/12 • 10/18 Project: 8-4Project Date: Mon 6/25/01 Task Progress 11111111111111.1.1M Summary Rolled Up Split Split Milestone • Rolled Up Task (i€ I i €i ` € € > Rolled Up Miestone Rolled Up Progress 11111111111111111111.111111 Project Summary Extemal Tasks Page 1 Exhibit D Task EXHIBIT E - EIR BUDGET Staff Rate Hours Cost Subtotals Task 1 - Prepare Revised Notice of Preparation and Initial Study Subtotal, Task 1: Task 2 - Prepare Screencheck Draft EIR Introduction and Executive Summary Project Description Environmental Setting Aesthetics (Light and Glare) Agricultural Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Haiards Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use Noise Transportation/Traffic Utilities/Service Systems Growth Inducing Impacts Senior Project Mgr. Environmental Planner Graphics Specialist Word Processing Senior Project Mgr. Environmental Analyst Senior Project Mgr. Environmental Planner Senior Project Mgr. Environmental Planner Senior Project Mgr. Senior Project Mgr. Environmental Planner Giroux & Associates Environmental Planner MBA Resource Mgmt. Group Environmental Planner Senior Project Manager McKenna et al. Environmental Planner Project Manager ALTA ENVIRO-MANAGEMENT Senior Project Manager Environmental Planner Senior Project Manager Environmental Planner Giroux & Associates Environmental Planner Project Manager Environmental Planner Environmental Planner 1 $110 $65 $60 $45 $110 $55 $110 $65 $110 $65 $110 $110 $65 $65 $65 $110 $65 $85 $110 $65 $110 $65 $65 '85 $65 $65 24 8 4 8 12 16 40 24 12 16 8 12 32 8 20 8 8 40 16 16 16 32 16 16 16 8 $2,640 $520 $240 $360 $1,320 $880 $4,400 $1,570 $1,320 $1,040 $880 $1,320 $2,080 $1,570 $520 $12,000 $1,300 $880 $3,630 $520 $3,400 $16,500 $1,760 $1,040 $1,760 $2,080 $1,565 $1,040 $1,360 $1,040 $520 $3,760 EXHIBIT E - EIR BUDGET (continued) Task Staff Rate Hours Cost Subtotals Cumulative Impacts Effects Not Found to Be Significant Alternatives to Proposed Project Graphics Production Document Production Subtotal, Task 2: Task 3 - Respond to City Staff Comments, Prepare Revised SDEIR for ERC Approval Subtotal, Task 3: Task 4 - Revise Per ERC, Produce NOP and Draft EIR Subtotal, Task 4: Task 5 - Prepare Prelim. Responses to Comments, Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program' Subtotal, Task 5: Task 6 - Prepare FEIR and Final MMRP for Action by Lead Agency Subtotal, Task 6: Task 7 - Attend Meetings With City Staff & Public Hearings Subtotal, Task 7: Task 8 - Project ManagementlQ.A. Subtotal, Task 8: Senior Project Mgr. $110 12 $1,320 Environmental Planner $65 24 $1,560 Environmental Analyst $55 6 $330 Senior Project Mgr. $110 20 $2,200 Environmental Planner $65 16 $1,040 Graphics Specialist $60 30 $1,800 Production Manager $45 20 $900 Word Processor $45 40 $1,800 Senior Project Mgr. $110 20 $2,200 Project Manager $85 8 $680 Environmental Planner $65 32 $2,080 Graphics Specialist $60 8 $480 Production Manager $45 4 $180 Word Processor/Clerical $45 12 $540 Senior Project Mgr. $110 16 $1,760 Environmental Planner $65 16 $1,040 Production Manager $45 8 $360 Word Processor/Clerical $45 16 $720 Senior Project Mgr. $110 40 $4,400 Environmental Planner $65 40 $2,600 Project Manager $85 10 $850 Subconsultants $1,000 Word Processing/Clerical $45 16 $720 Production Manager $45 4 $180 Senior Project Mgr. $110 12 $1,320 Environmental Planner 65 20 $1,300 Word Processing/Clerical $45 8 $360 Production Manager $45 4 $180 Senior Project Mgr. $110 Project Coordinator $85 Subconsultants 30 28 $3,300 $2,380 $500 Principal $135 20 $2,700 Senior Project Mgr. $110 64 • $7,040 2 $78,245 $6,160 $3,880 $11,870 $3,160 $6,180 $9,740 EXHIBIT E - EIR BUDGET (continued) Task Staff Rate Hours Cost Subtotals Project Coordinator Tasks Project Coordinator Reimbursable Expenses (Document reproduction, reprographics, Added Cost for Accelerated Schedule to Certify FEIR on 10/16/2001 postage, mileage, fax, film and photos)Z $85 80 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS ` This is a not -to -exceed amount, based on the number of hours shown. If a greater level of effort is necessary, we will notify the City prior to reaching this limit, and would exceed this budget only if authorized in advance by City staff. 2 This estimate assumes the following quantities and number of pages for the deliverables to be produced for this project. We will notify the City in advance if expenses will exceed this estimate. Additional expense charges would occur only if authorized in advance by City staff. 3- Screencheck Draft Revised Initial Studies @ 30 pages 1-Final Revised Initial Study @ 30 pages 3- First Draft Project Descriptions @ 10 pages 3- Screencheck Draft EIR @ 200 pages 3- First Draft Appendix Materials @ 150 pages 10- Revised SDEIRs for ERC Review @ 200 pgs 5- Appendix for ERC Review @ 150 pages 30- Draft EIR for Public Review @ 200 pages 10- Appendix for Public Review @ 150 pages 3- Screencheck Final EIR @ 50 pages $6,800 $2,800 3- Screencheck MMRP @ 10 pages 20- Revised FEIR's for PC Review @ 50 pages 20- MMRPs for PC Review @ 10 pages 20- Revised FEIR's for CC Review @ 50 pages 20- MMRPs for CC Review @ 10 pages 3Costs for additional services requested by the City will be billed on a time and expenses basis, in accordance with current hourly rates for the consultants who are involved. 3 $6,800 $2,800 $40,000 $172,595 Agreement - Value Based Initiative Program - On motion of Councilmember Haws, seconded by Councilmember Freedman, the City Council unanimously approved an amendment to the agreement with the United Way of the East Valley pursuant to the goals of the Police Depaitment's Value Based Initiative Program and authorized the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the contract on behalf of the City. Contract - Wildland Fire Protection Services - On motion of Councilmember Haws, seconded by Councilmember Freedman, the City Council unanimously approved a contract with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection for wildland fire protection services. PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Funds - Contract - Sports Park - Following a presentation by Community Development Director Shaw regarding the recommended changes in regards to the environmental impact report for the sports parks, Councilmember Freedman asked several questions of Councilmembers. Councilmember Haws reported meetings have been held with a non-profit foundation offering a significant financial contribution to the sports parks if the work is completed in an expeditious manner. The expedited scheduled and increased scope of work has an additional cost of $40,000.00. These funds will be reimbursed by State monies to be received in the future. Councilmember Haws moved to approve termination of the City's contract with Helix Environmental Planning, Inc. for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report. Motion seconded by Councilmember Freedman and carried unanimously. Councilmember Haws moved to approve a contract with Michael Brandman Associates for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the sports park and Airport Land Use Plan amendment. Motion seconded by Councilmember George and carried unanimously. Councilmember Haws moved to approve an additional appropriation in the amount of $92,755.00 for a total contract amount with Michael Brandman Associates not to exceed $172,595.00. Motion seconded by Councilmember George and carried with Councilmember Freedman voting NO. COMMUNICATIONS Energy Saving Program - Councilmember George urged the City Council and staff to do everything possible to conserve electricity during this crisis the state is experiencing. He noted the conversion of the traffic signals at Citrus Avenue and Orange Street is showing an 83 percent savings. He also suggested cranking up the thermostats in city facilities by 10 degrees and allowing a casual dress code for employees. Fire Chief Enslow reported Fire Battalion chief Mitch McKee will be forming a committee made up of employee representatives from each department. The objective of this task force will be initiate the "Kill A Watt" program to identify energy saving techniques in the workplace. A report will be prepared for the City Manager who will then bring June 19, 2001 Page 5