HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_120-2002FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT TO FURNISH CONSULTING SERVICES
FOR CALIFORNIA STREET AND I-10 SIGNAL DESIGN MODIFICATIONS
This Agreement is made and entered into this 6th day of August 2002, by and between the
City of Redlands, a municipal corporation ("City"), and Albert Grover and Associates ("Consultant").
In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Consultant agree to the
following amendments to the Agreement to Furnish Consulting Services dated December 4, 2001
(hereinafter the "Agreement"):
Section 1. In addition to those services listed in Exhibit "A" to the Agreement, Consultant
shall provide the following additional services:
Respond to additional comments provided by Caltrans and adjust the signal improvements
to fit in with the civil design changes related to the new stoiui drain and the widened street at the
northeast corner of the project.
Section 2. In addition to the compensation payable to Consultant in Section 5.1 of the
Agreement, Consultant shall be paid the additional sum of $3,200.00 for the additional services
described in Section 1, above. The total compensation now payable to Consultant pursuant to the
Agreement is $15,100.
Section 3. Consultant's Services under the Agreement shall now be completed by August 10,
2002.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of the parties have signed in confirmation
of this First Amendment to Agreement.
CITY OF REDLANDS ATTEST:
B 7 �-
-7X
Y �.
Mayor City erk
Date August 7, 2002
ALBERT GROVER AND ASSOCIATES
BY
/ dui M eI4
54e7y
Date gfr/DZ
C:\WINDOWS\TEMPORARY INTERNET FILES \CONTENT.IES\TB77D5WE\AGA 1ST AMEND.WPD
1
Contract Amendment - Signal Design Modifications - On motion of
Councilmember Gilbreath, seconded by Councilmember Peppler, the City
Council unanimously authorized staff to amend the Albert Grover and
Associates (AGA) contract to provide engineering services for additional
services in the amount of $3,200.00 for the California Street and Interstate
10 signal design modifications.
PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Private Walkway - Ed Hales Park - Community Development Director Shaw
reported the City Council considered a request on April 16, 2002, from the
owners of thebuilding at 109 East State Street to modify their building by the
addition of a doorway and walkway to provide access into the building from the
Ed Hales Park. The City Council indicated it would be appropriate to receive
feedback from the Parks Commission, Planning Commission and the Historic
and Scenic Preservation Commission before proceeding with any action on this
request. On March 14, 2002, the Parks Commission reviewed the proposal and
had no significant concerns and recommended the proposal be approved as
submitted. On May 2, 2002, the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission
reviewed the proposal and recommended the City Council deny the proposal as
submitted; however, if the applicant does move forward, they would prefer the
entrance be on the alley and have a contemporary design and that the sidewalk
be oriented to the alley, not the park. On May 14 and June 25, 2002, the
Planning Commission recommended the proposal be denied as submitted and
only be approved if the entrance is on the alley side. Since the City owns the
park, allowing access may limit the City's ability to close or use a portion of the
park in the future. If the City Council approves the entrance on the park side,
there may be some legal issues that will need to be resolved. If the entrance is
on the alley side, then there is no City Council action needed and the applicant
would only need a building permit. Bill Cloud, the applicant's representative,
was present to answer questions. Councilmembers felt the rear access from the
alley seemed most appropriate. Councilmember Haws moved to deny the
project as proposed by the applicant. Motion seconded by Councilmember
George and carried unanimously.
Sign Code Update - Community Development Director Shaw reported the last
major comprehensive update of the Redlands Sign Code was completed in 1998.
Subsequent to that update, several smaller amendments have been processed. A
couple of years ago, the Chamber of Commerce initiated a review of the Sign
Code based on concerns of businesses. A list of proposed amendments was
developed to address a variety of issues. Workshops and a formal Zoning
Ordinance Text Amendment was processed through the Planning Commission
last year. On August 28, 2001, the Planning Commission completed their
evaluation and forwarded the proposed amendment to the City Attorney for
drafting of a revised Sign Code. The City Attorney has been preparing a revised
Sign Code based upon the recommendations of the Planning Commission and
also to place the Sign Code on firm legal ground. At this time, staff would like
August 6, 2002
Page 6