Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout5485_CCv0001.pdf RESOLUTION NO. 5485 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS REVISING GENERAL PLAN FIGURES 4.2 AND 4.3 TO CLARIFY THE BOUNDARIES OF THE SOUTHEAST AREA PLAN, CLARIFY AND ADJUST THE LOCATION OF THE SECTOR BOUNDARIES, DELETE SECTORS 11 AND 12 AND MAKE MINOR CHANGES TO THE TEXT OF-SECTION 4.42 OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Redlands has recommended an amendment to the Southeast Area Plan maps and text of the Redlands General Plan pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 878 after holding a public hearing upon notice in accordance with the Government Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, R.P.C. Resolution No. 878 has been certified to the City Council of the City of Redlands; and WHEREAS, on the 25th day of February, 1998, a Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Redlands Daily Facts and the San Bernardino County Sun; and WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the City Council declares that the proposed amendment is in the interest of the public health, safety and general welfare; and WHEREAS, all of the provisions of the Government Code relating to the amendment of the General Plan have been complied with, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redlands: That the amendment to the General Plan adopted by the Planning Commission in R.P.C. Resolution No. 878 shall be adopted as follows: AMENDMENT N0. 66 d TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS Revise General Plan Figures 4.2 and 4.3 to clarify the boundaries of the Southeast Area Plan, clarify and adjust the location of the sector boundaries, delete sectors 11 and 12 and make minor changes to the text of Section 4.42 of the Land Use Element as particularly described in Exhibit "A" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 17th day of March, 1998. Mayor1f the City of RZands ATTEST: Cit y, clerk I, Lorrie Poyzer, City Clerk, City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 17th day of March, 1998, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Banda, George, Freedman; Mayor Cunningham NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Councilmember Gilbreath City Clerk V l k 1 g , i . Replace General Plan Figure 4.2 with a revised.`Geneem Plan Figure 4:2 Replace General Plan Figure 4.3 with a revised:Ge.neral Pian Figure 4 3 Modify the text in Section 4.42, Southeast Area, of the Land Use Element of the General Pian as follows: Page 12, modify first paragraph to indicate 10 subsectors. Planning Sectors - The Southeast Area Plan identifies-42--;::1:0 sectors, the "Planning Sectors", as shown in GP figure 4.3. Because of the number and complexity of the Planning Sectors , the Southeast Area Plan does not provide a detailed plan of development for each sector. A specific plan shall be developed for each of those sectors consistent with the Guiding Policies in this section. Policy 4.42a (at the end of this section) requires the preparation of a specific pian for each of the Planning Sectors. Notwithstanding Policy 4.42x, a specific plan shall not be a prerequisite for the approval of any residential development project consisting of four(4) dwelling units or less within Planning Sector 2. —Pa e 14, second and eighth paragraphs, modify Figure 4.428 to 4.42. Delete the word "basing" from fourth paragraph. The easiest features to describe and quantify are the signature ridges. These ridges are those which define a significant edge, either in the foreground or at a distance. ©n-site observations and an examination of the topography of the Southeast Area led to the designation of five ridge formations as "signature ridges. These ridges also separate the major drainage basins within the area. Signature ridges in the Southeast Area are shown in Figure & 4;42. Policy 4.42d deals with the protection of ridges within the Southeast Area. EXHIBIT "ATl i'I� These basins-basing between the signature ridges are designated signature basins. . In addition to the signature ridges are the myriad of lesser ridges which thrust out of these major walls into the canyons below. These ridges and the canyons between are a part of the internal canyon perception, since they are perceived as being " in the canyon". As internal features they do not individually make signature statements, but collectively they do to some degree. Lesser ridges which are considered especially important due to their size or location are shown as "major" ridges on Figure#. 41.42. Page 16, sixth paragraph, change to reflect Sectors 1 and 4. The San Timoteo Canyon watercourse is a graded channel throughout its length in the Southeast Area. This channel should, as in Live Oak Canyon, be the backbone of a linear parkway which includes the watercourse, an equestrian/hiking trail, bike/pedestrian paths, linear park improvements, and a parkside roadway. The parkside roadway envisioned serves the park and also the land uses to the north and west within Planning;Secrs '[ and 4. Page 19. third paragraph,_change to reflect Sector 3 and delete Sector 12. On the other hand, it also appears that there exists several areas of Grade 1 agricultural soils which are of sufficient size as to perhaps warrant preservation consideration. In order of size these are.- 1 re:1. San Timoteo Canyon, except for the watercourse itself, Planning Sector ++"3. 2. Live Oak Canyon, except the watercourse, Planning Sector 12 and the Southerly portion of Planning Sector 9. 3. Alessandro Canyon and the canyon bottom fingers related thereto , Planning Sector 1. 4. The canyon bottom in Planning Sector 8, and 5. The canyon bottom in Planning Sector 6. Z/�. Policy 4.42 addresses the preservation of agricultural uses in the Southeast Area. * Page 20. eighth paragraph. change to reflect the revised Sector 3. Planning Sector 3: cany-oris, all feHowing the Sarne basic (:3 1 1&1 11 1 1_-I I L, Funning from the edge of pfaftff"Itg escaFprnent whieh is the dividing line between Planning Seetom 2 and 3 is q- Hte steep, access tO the '_Qj IYCIJ 40 V ithin th s basin have histefically been up canyon frorn S TfrfT�CTi of eLT been histofical access into 3 over this ridge ffom Alessandro. SimilaFly, the Fidge separating Planning Sector 3 from 5 appears to have been a histefical acces, route Of 8 Sfftin this mnstLMI­il-�e the ridge is of a significant size, bt2t, gentle siopes. Thtis, :,' has pfovided "easy" access to the ridge top area which atse happens !o be rounded in character. This.Sector is located in San Timoteo Canyon and has historically taken access from San Timoteo Canyon Road and Alessandro Road. * Page 22. seventh paragraph. change Exhibit 4.42A to 4.42. The General Plan map is intended to conceptually illustrate how policies could be implemented, not where specific features would be required, as in a Specific Plan. (See Exhibit 4.42 4.42.) * Page 29-31 Revisions to Exhibit A, Statistical Summary. Exhibit "A", Statistical Summary, ( shown below and on the following pages) presents the results of the application of these densities. These results are expressed in terms of the most commonly considered impacts resultant therefrom, acres involved, number of dwelling units, population, number of school age children, automobile trips per day and peak hour automobile trips. Presenfed art:estimates for each.plax nrng:secle�r,..specific..sle pe analysi and densrtles shah b�deermxned part Qf the Specific Plan tach sector. EXHIBIT A: SOUTHEAST AREA PLAN STATISTICAL SUMMARY 714 City of Redlands General Plan EXHIBIT A: SOUTHEAST AREA PLAN STATISTICAL SUMMARY Pop. Peak- Planning eakPlanning Cm Junior Senior Hour Sector Slope Densitv Acres D.U.'s 3.00 K-6 High High Total ADT Trips 1 0 to 15% 1.0 118 118 351 40 20 20 80 1180 1 18 >15to 30% 2.5 1 35 14 42 4 1 2 2 9 41) 1-1 ©S l? 62 0 0 R(' > 81 0 0 Min. [21 10.0 192 19 57 6 3 12 190 20 Max. [31 5.0 192 39 141 12 6 6 24 390 39 S.t. (Min.) 488 150 450 5o 25 25 100 1500 150 2 0 to 15% 1.0 74 74 222 24 12 12 48 740 74 >15 to 30% 2.5 22 8 24 2 1 1 1 5 80 8 RC >30% 0 118 0 0 Min. [21 10.0 93 9 27 4 2 8 90 9 Max. [31 5.0 93 19 57 6 3 3 12 190 19 s.t. 3O7 90 273 30 15 15 60 900 90 3 0 to 15% 1.0 23 23 69 6 3 3 15 230 23 >15to 30% 2.5 8 3 9 2 1 1. 3 30 3 0S 0 5 0 0 RC () 16 f1 11 Min. [2] 10.0 43 4 12 2 1 1 3 40 4 Max. 131 5.0 43 8 24 2 1 1 5 80 8 s.t. 1 95 29 87 10 5 5 19 290 29 4 0 to 15% 1.0 73 73 219 24 12 12 48 730 73 >15to 3fI°l 2.5 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 10 1 0S 0 7 11 0 41 0 [) tI i) 0 RC >30% 0 199 0 lI () 0 0 f1 0 0 Mill. 11-1 10.0 3 1 3 0 !> (I I 10 1 J. 283 74 1 223 24 1 2 Iry 50 740 74 5 0 to 15% 1.0 20 20 60 6 1 3 13 200 20 I >15to 30% 2.5 2 1 3 t_i o I 10 I 14' over 30% 0 79 1 0 0 1 c r c 1 0 0 CARE DLANDSIGP1GP.A4 19Sep98,l t:49,uu1 Section 4.0,,Land Use-30 City of Redland-t General Plan Pop. Peak Planning r@ Junior Senior Hour Sector Slope Density Acres D.U.'s 3.00 K-6 High High Total ADT Trills Min. [2] 10.(} 19 1 3 () 0 {1 1 10 1 Max. [31 5.0 19 3 9 0 0 0 2 30 3 s.t. 1_{) 22 66 6 3 3 14 220 22 6 0 to 15% 1.0 ; 55 165 18 9 1 9 36 550 55 16 to 30 % 2.5 4 2 6 0 0 ) 2 20 2 RC >30% f) 163 (} (} {) {} 0 0 Min. 12] 10.0 73 7 21 1 2 1 1 4 70 7 Max. [3] 5.0 73 14 42 4 2 9 140 14 S.t. '95 64 192 20 1 1{) 42 640 64 7 0 to 15 % 1.0 18 18 54 6 3 3 12 180 18 >15 to 30% 2.5 3 1 3 0 0 0 1 10 1 RC >30% 0 88 0 0 0 [} 0 11 O 0 Min. 121 10.0 6 1 3 0 0 0 I I11 1 Max. [31 5.0 6 1 3 0 0 0 1 I l) s.t. 115 20 60 6 3 3 13 200 21) 8 Oto 15% 1.{} 42 42 126 12 6 6 2f4 420 42 >15to 30% 2.5 36 14 42 4 Z 2 9 140 14 0 1 0 0 tl 0 0 (} {1 0 RC >30% 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1 Min. [21 10.0 57 5 15 0 0 0 3 50 5 Max. [31 5.0 57 11 33 4 2 2 8 110 11 s.t. 221 61 183 2{) 10 10 40 610 61 9 0 to 159C, 1,0 56 56 195 18 9 9 37 560 56 >15to 30% 2.5 2 1(1 0 0 () 1 20 2 11 2 0 €) o 0 0 0 0 0 W, >31) 0 85 0 0 Ii 0 0 0 0 0 Min. [2] 10.0 6 1 3 0 0 (1 1 10 1 Max. [31 5.0 6 1 3 O f) (1 1 10 1 S.t, 156 59 177 20 10 to 4(} 1 590 59 C:\RE,DLANDSIGPIGP.A4 l9Sep9N,11:49ani1 Section 4.0,Land Use-31 Cin, (f Redlanth- General Plan: Pop. Peak Planning 0 Junior Senior Hour Sector Slope Density Acres D.U.'s 3.00 K-6 High High Total ADT Trips 10 0 to 15% 1.0 43 43 129 14 7 7 28 430 43 >15to 30% ',s _ 1 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 10 1 OS 0 () 0 () 0 () (1 (I +i RC >30% O 5 O 0 0 0 {l 0 0 Min.[2] 10.0 n 0 d d d Max. [3] 1 5.0 3 0 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 SA. 109 44 132 14 7 7 30 440 44 TOTAL: 7-1 2189 1 613 I843 208 100 1 100 408 6134 613 Footnotes: [1]. Density is expressed as Acres Required/ Dwelling Unit. [2]. Minimum is the Density permitted without a special showing. 131. Maximum is the maximum Density permitted with a special showing. D.U. = Dwelling Unit s.t. = Subtotal Definitions: PopuIation/household is assumed to be 3.00 persons per household. School systein is assumed to be 6-3-3. Average Daily Trips per household(ADT) is assumed to be 10.0. Peak Hour Trips are assumed to be 10% of ADT. OS -Open Space = Parks/Golf Courses/Agriculture/.Flood Control/Construction Aggregates/Conservation/Habitat Preservation RC - Resource Conservation C:1RI:DLANDSIGPIGP.A4 19Sep98,11:49an1 Sertinta 4.0, Land Use-32