HomeMy WebLinkAbout4317_CCv0001.pdf RESOLUTION NO. 4317
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF REDLANDS ADOPTING AMENDMENT
NO. 38 TO THE CITY OF REI LANDS GENERAL
PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redlands
( "this City Council" ) , its planning staff and consultants
have undertaken a comprehensive study of existing land uses
within the southeast area of the City of Redlands; and
WHEREAS, as a result of that comprehensive study,
this City Council has determined it is in the best interests
of the citizens of Redlands to amend the Redlands General
Plan to provide for new land use designations in the south-
east area of the City to preserve the public health, safety
and welfare and has further directed its planning staff and
consultants to prepare General Plan Amendment No. 38; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section
65358, the Planning Commission of the City of Redlands has
held a noticed public hearing on General Plan Amendment
No. 38 and made a written recommendation on the proposed
General Plan amendment to this City Council; and
WHEREAS, on December 15, 1987, this City Council
held a noticed public hearing on General Plan Amendment
No. 38 at which it received written and oral testimony on
the proposed amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL"
OF THE CITY REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of
Redlands hereby adopts General Plan Amendment No. 38 as
contained in the document identified with the 'index title of
GP-38 and entitled "City of Redlands, Live: +yak. Canyon
(Southeast Area) General Plan Amendment No. 38,
September 18 1987, " with the following revisions:
(a) On Page 4 , the following paragraph shall
be amended to read:
"Policy: Both sirnaure rides and major'
ridges within canyons shall be identified
and shall be preserved and enhanced.
Significant modification of these ridges
shall occur only where offsetting need is
demonstrated;. Development on ridge lines
is allowed as lon as it sta within the
parameters of thisolic�r« offsetting
need is defined as demonstration that the
grade of a specific parcel re` ures
Modification of an existinq raid e line to
produce sufficient space to site a
building ad and that the result will not
,f
eliminate the continuit of t4�d e
line thrdu h radi o or structure in
ss
(b) On Page 6, the following paragraphs shall
be amended to read.*
"We propeae that this feature net
only not be hidden btt- that it be empha-
sized so as to ensure it remains ft sign&-
ttre characteristic in the ftttdreT Spe-
cifieallyT during the 1930-Ls through the
O-Ls there was a tendency by plannert to
place water courses and rail lines -Lett,
of sight and out of fflirid Tl This was dome
by placing them to the rear of lets of
burying them among leas aesthetic land
dsesT industrial area in part+cularT
Today this is ehang+ng as there is an
emerging tendency to see these improve-
ments as offering positive aesthetic
statements in the community: A good
example lies in San 4daft eap+stranO where
& refocusing on and tedevelopment of
their rail line edge on the adjacent San
Juan P-reek water course hat suceessfully
oecurreaT Within San Tifflotee these
elements form a very forfftidable lineal
pattern: We feel this pattern should not
be ignoredT but enh&meed by straightening
-3-
it with not ebly compatible bet with
seppertive land Uses."
'"San Timoteo Canyon Road is shown on
the San Bernardino Master Plan as "at
grade, four lane arterial highway" and
the Riverside plan as "110 foot wide
arterial highway (four lane divided, at
least) . " Redlands should strongly advo-
cate that the improvements support the
signature characteristics present . San
Timoteo Road, and if realigned, should be
realigning maintain or expand its
alignment adjacent to the rail line to
(1 ) protect the rail line, and ( 2) to
allow greater viewing and enjoyment of
the trains as they pass through the
canyon. "
'The realignment to the rail line
edge wodid also open 4p the land the
soh to perm-It the opporttn+ty of land
uses in th+s area less chopped dp by the
intervention of the read way. "
-4-
(c) On Page 7, the following paragraph shall
be amended to read:
"Policy: The City of Redlands shall
work to ensure that when San Timoteo
Canyon Road is realigned and upgraded it
shall bet fit realigning to lie maintain
and expand its alignment adjacent to the
existing rail line, and (2) be routed to
provide ready access to the I-10
Freeway. "
(d) On Page 8, the following paragraph shall
be amended to read:
"The Alessandro Bridge over the
water course is inadequate in width to
handle the projected traffic of even the
lowest density scenarios developed for
the study area. Further, the site lines
approaching the existing bridge are
Appear inadequate. Thttsj the roadway
should be realigning to the northwest
ever a new wider bridgev Consideration
should tt_qLiyen to realignment of the
roadway," wide
-5-
(e) On Page 9, paragraph 5 relating to slope
densities shall be amended to read:
plc ,e Density
0-15% 1 .0 acre
16-30% 2. 5 acres
over 30% 10 . 0 to 5. 0 acres
Planning staff is directed to _A!-,�elo�
specific criteria governing the determi-
nation of the number of acres which the
City will re wire for a dwellin2 unit to
be located on slopes exceedLa9-291,- such
criteria shall recc nice the slices c
this amendment to the Redlands General
Plan that devtlaaens i
ridqelines in the Southeast Area of
Redlands, ta!��ninto account the Plan-
ninq Sector in which the dtyfj2pE+st is
ro used to tame Lace and an s ecific
lan re aced fc�r the Tannin tor , on
6-
( f) On page 13, the following paragraph shall
be amended to read:
"Policy: Areas of development consisting
30% slope cr less, or where residential
densities do not exceed one unit per ten
acres, which, abut an area of significant
natural vegetation shall be separated by
a fuel modification zone which contains
an all-weather access roadway and a water
supply system having fire flaw capacity. "
(g) Can Rage 21, the fallowing paragraph shall
be amended to ream:
"Beginning at San Timoteo Canyon
Road and working in towards the first
section of concern is a section centered
on the San Timoteo crossing. The bridge
and its northern approach appears cur-
rently marginal and requires major revi-
sion.
e i-sion. Our research indicates that the
bridge width is inadequate to accommodate
even the lowest projected volumes and
that the curve to the north of the bridge
will also be found inadequate and unac-
ceptable. The approach needs to be
straightened out and the 'bridge
widened. Translated this indi atc!t This
ti
-7-
may require an entire new bridge in a
location probably to the west of the
current location. "
(h) On Page 29, the following paragraph shall-
be
hallbe amended to read:
"Policy: A specific plan study of
the T+rftoteo eany Planning Sectors I and II
shall be undertaken to establish the location
for and the resolution of :
1. The realignment widening and
alignment of San Timoteo Canyon Road,
2. The realignment alignment and
reloeettion wideninq or relocation of the
Alessandro Bridge, and
3 . The site for a convenience com-
mercial development to serve the area. "
( i ) On page 27, the following paragraph shall
be amended to read:
"The General Plan Map illustrates how
these recommended policy statements are
intended to go together to form a
whole. See Map "A, " attached. Concerns
have been expressed that features,
articularly roads, shown on the General
Plan Map will be reused as shown. The
General Plan Ta is intended to conce
tually illustrate how _Polie
implemented, not whert_-s ecific features
would be
level. "
( j ) On Pages 27 and 28, confusion regarding
development rights has occurred due to merging of the con-
cepts of preserved natural open space and low density
residential. Revisions show that only 500 acres of 1,200
labeled "preserve natural area" are proposed for public
purchase (consistent with the open space plan) and the rest
of the area is planned for low density residential. The 500
acres proposed for public purchase will be identified when
the open space plan is implemented. These changes are coor-
dinated with map revisions A and F.
(k) On page 28, the following paragraph is
amended to read as follows :
"Residential land uses:
The plan deeignatei5t those areas
having a slope condition of less than ae*
as -Ldevelopment areas:- Within these
development ftreasy density of residential
tse has been assigned on the basis of
slope from 6% to 15% eta slopes from 161
to 30*7 The less sloping being assigned
-9-
be calculated -Lhigh density-L and the
steeper being assigned the -Lmedium
densityT,
Because the topogtaphy of the
planning area to irregularT a gradient
study of each development area is
required before precise density allo-
cations can be made: This should be
accomplished as part of the precise
planning for each of the planning
seetorsT discussed earlierT
Density Alternative B provides the
density figures within the planning areas
which are 1 unit per acre for slopes 0 to
15% , 1 unit per 2 . 5 acres for slopes 16
to 30% and 1 unit per 15 10 to 5 acres
for slopes over 30% . Planning staff is
directed to dey:tjlp spa cific_ criteria
gorerning the determination of the number
of acres which the City will require for
a dwellinq unit to be located on sl2pes
exceeding 30% .
( 1) On page 29, the following para-
graph is added to read:
"Access to Sunset Drive - Planning Sector
Two is__.La RLatea4 with existing access is
_10-
Sunset Drive which would require exten-
sive 2radia 2 to take access from Live Oak
Canyon Road. Other similar situations
involving small acreages of undeveloped
property along; Sunset Drive or feeder
streets to Sunset Drive exist which would
not be practical to access from Live Oak
Canyon Road. "
(m) On Page 30, the following paragraph is
amended to read:
"Alessandro Road: This plan pro-
poses to recontureT realign and generally
upgrade Alessandro from San Timoteo to
Crescent. This proposal will allow
Alessandro to fulfill its western peri-
meter function in the circulation system
with a minimum impact on adjacent land
uses. Also, this will correct a series
of existing deficiencies in this impor-
tant through street. "
"San Timoteo Road: This plan pro-
poses= to replace the existing San Timotee
eanyon Read both within the plan area
with a couplet of tea reads edtside the
plan area with a freeway conneetion.
_11-
First, the existing and future regional
arterial highway function of San Timoteo
requires that the existing roadbed be
significantly upgraded. San Timoteo,
Canyon Road is shown on both the San
Bernardino County and Riverside County
master plans as a four-lane divided
highway. This plan proposes that this be
accomplished in a timely manner to
encourage regional trip users to pass
around Redlands rather than attempting to
pass through town via Alessandro,
Crescent and other local streets . Addi-
tionallyr the plan proposes the City of
Redlands take a lead role in connecting
the realigning and upgraded San Timoteo
to the 1-10 Freeway in the vicinity of
the I-10/California Interchange. Again,
the purpose of this proposal is to
encourage regional users to drive around
rather than through Redlands proper . "
"Within the planning area the plan
proposal is to make San Timoteo 6anyon
Read one-half of a teenie highway in
eentnetion with the rail read and the
-12-
water course by realigning San Timatee,
adjacent to the existing main line rail
read traeksT This will work to keep the
characteristic rail read feature of this
area visible and also to provide a bdffer
between adjacent land uses and the
tracksT AlsoT the realignment will unite
the land currently separated by the read
way into larger and perhaps more prodde-
tive parcels along the South side of the
canyonT The second have of this scenic
highway proposal +3 a new park way type
highway at the base of the slopes on the
northerly side of the San Timoteo P-anyon
water eodraeT The read way would connect
the development within the interior of
Planning Sector 3 with Live eak art ch
Read an one end and Alessandro Read on
the otherT This road way is simul-
taneously a seen+c park way along the
water codrae a collector for Planning
Sector 3 and an important +nter-area link
to the proposed commercial center on
Alessandrov"
-13-
(n) On page 33, to emphasize that the
PERFUMAA requirements apply to subdivisions only, the
following paragraph shall be amended to >read:
"Policy.- The Perimeter Fuel Modification/
Access Area (PERPUMAA) concept shall be
adopted and implemented within each of
the Planning Sectors identified in this
plan.
Policy: No development in areas of less
than 30* 30% slope or less, or in areas
where residential densities do not exceed
one unit per 10 acres, shall be permitted
to be occupied until such time as all the
fire safety measures required by the City
are in place and operational. "
(o) On Page 34, the following paragraphs
shall be amended to read:
"Utilities:
(a) With exception of Planning
Section 27 the plan does not prestppose
the need for an urban sewer systemT Given
,the to densities proposed and the soil
conditions present it appears a s-obstan
tial port-ion of the development eodId
ttil+te septic systems; This matter
shodid be part of the specific planning
-14-
for each of the planning sectorsT The
exception to this appears to be Planning
Section 2 where the permeability of the
soil is poorT if it is found that an
urban system is reqdiredT care should be
exercised reference its siting to ensure
none of the identified signature charac-
teristies of the area are degraded:
Because cit sewer is not projected to
serve this area in the near future,
septic systems will be allowed accoEALnS
to City Public Services Code 13 . 44. 080 .
That code- requires, installation of dry
sewer systems in addition to segos
systems to facilitate eventual_h2S�k r
a city sewer stem. Each development
pr )posal shall address the optimet mean
of managing waste water by providing
sufficient information to the city and
the Water Quality Control Board to assess
the vi abs i t cif �ro 9sed solutions . An
a,l,ignment stuk tc determine costs of
extending a sewer trun�jjntup San
Timoteo iCa
AUorl Road should be ascan-
.fished as art c the first s ecif;ic'
plan in the area. "
_15-
p) The following revisions are made to the
General Plan Amendment No. 38 Map= ( 1) delete public para,
( ) revise Alessandro and San T moteo Reade to existing
alignments, ( 3) delete frontage road along Alessandro north
of the "loop, " ( ); delete southeastern portion of road at
base of slopes in Planning Sector 4 on the northerly side of
the flood control channel and extend Alessandro Road through
Planning Sectors 5 and 3 where alternative access/emergency
road is shorn, ( ) relocate road shown in Planning Sector 9
south to avoid ridge lines, ( ) relable the "preserved
natural area" to "low density residential. area, " and..
( ) label map as a conceptual land use and circulation plan
Section 2. The City's planning staff and consul-
tants are hereby directed to incorporate the draft General
-16-
Plan Amendment and the revisions made by this Resolution
into a finalized General Plan Amendment.
PASSED, adopted and approved this 15th day of
December, 1987 .
Mayor, City of Redlands
ATTEST:
City-'-'C�erk
I , Borrie Poyzer , City Clerk , City of Redlands , hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of December,
1987 , by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Wormser , Cunningham; Mayor Beswick
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember DeMirjyn
ABSTAIN: Councilmember Johnson
Z-�ity Cleresk
-17-
DJM0226
a
r
,H �`1 i1MNt inti
My •� � '��� ' "v";. �l�"""° •.w t�� � �_�� '�' ^
Y�
M
r
RESOLUTION NO. 4317
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS FOR ADOPTION OF
AMENDMENT NO. 38 TO THE GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redlands has deemed it to be
in the public interest to amend the General Plan in accordance with
California Government Code Section 65358, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Redlands has made a
written reconmendation on amendment of the General Plan,- and
WHEREAS, on the 5th day of December, 1987, a Notice of Public Hearing
was published in the Redlands Daily Facts; and
WHEREAS, on the 15th day of December, 1987, the City Council has held
a duly advertised public hearing concerned with the proposed amendment to
the said General Plan,- and
WHEREAS, following said public hearing, the City Council declares that
the proposed amendment is in the interest of the public health, safety and
general welfare, and
WHEREAS, all of the provisions of the Government Code relating to the
amendment of the General Plan have been complied with;
NOWr THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Redlands:
That an amendment to the General Plan shall be adopted as follows:
Amendment No. 38 to the General Plan of the City of Red- landst
and by reference the document identified with the index title of
GP-38 entitled:
"City of Redlands, Live Oak Canyon (Southeast Area) General Plan
Amendment No. 38f September 15 , 1987," including staff
recommended revisions as recorded in Planning Commission minutes
of November 24, 1987, and memorandum from the Director of
Planning and Comiunity Development to City Council dated December
9 , 1987, and further modified the memorandum from the Director of
Planning and Community Development to City Council dated December
9f 1987 , as followst Page 4, paragraph a, POLICY: Major ridges
it in canyons shall be identified and shall be preserved and
enhanced. Significant modification of these ridges shall occur
only where offsetting need is demonstrated. DEIVEL OPMENT ON
PILL LINE IS ALL OTIED AS LONG AS IT STAYS WITHIN THE PARAMETERS
OF THIS POLICY. SHOULD SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES EXIST ON A
PARTICULAR PARCEL (SUCH AS SHAPEr SIZE, OR UNUSUAL TOPOGRAPHY)
WHICB WOULD DEPRIVE THAT PROPERTY OWNER OF SUBSTANTIAL BENEFITS
ENJOYED 'BY ADJACENT OR NEARBY OWNERS, THE RIDGELINE RESTRICTION
IN THIS PLAN CAN BE MODIFIED BUT ONLY AFTER A SPECIFIC FINDING BY
THE CITY COUNCIL THAT SUCH MODIFICATION DOES NOT RESULT IN
SIGNIFICANT DETRIMENT TO THE OVERALL OBJECTIVES OF THIS PLAN,"
and further modified to change the density allowed to "I acre,
2-1/2 acre, and 10-5 acres with specified criteria to be
developed for the ability, to be 5 acres. "
ADOPTED, SIGNBD AND APPROVED this 15th day of December, 1987 .
---"the City of Redlands
ATTEST: of
'City ,Clerk
I, Lorrie Poyzer, City Clerk, City of Redlands, hereby certify that the
foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 15th day of December , 1987 , by the following
vote=
A ` Councilmembers or or, Cunningham; Mayor Beswick
NOES: None
ABSENT: Councilmember DeMirjyn
ABSTAIN: Countmember Johnson
C
Ciyl6k
Resolution No. 4317
General Plan Amendment No. 38
EXHIBIT A
x
Live Oal In
rpm W—MMMMM
k
R
ry rN
# � h
..� �.• CITY LIMIT LINE'
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT No. 38
The Environmental Impact Report for General Plan Amendment No. 38
recommends 130 mitigation measures which have been included in
the plan to reduce or avoid environmental damage to the maximum
extent possible. Unavoidable significant impacts remain in the
categories of:
soils,
geology,
hydrology,
biological resources,
air quality,
noise, and
solid waste.
SOILS
The proposed Amendment contributes to the continued cumulative
removal of prime and important soil resources throughout the
region. The cumulative loss of these soil resources has been
substantial since the mid-1940 ' s (The Planning Group 1986) and in
a manner similar to overdraft of an aquifer, this cumulative loss
can be considered a significant adverse impact because the
availability of this non-renewable resource is being removed for
an indefinite period.
Even though the overall density of development between the
existing Plan and zone designations has been reduced, much of the
prime soil resources adjacent to and north of Live Oak Canyon
Road was previously designated for lower density (2 .5 acre and
up) development. Thus, relative to the existing Plans and zoning
the Amendment' s proposed one acre designations in the flat
alluvial areas adjacent to and north of Live Oak Canyon Road will
cause a greater impact to soil resources in this area. The
exception to this conclusion is in those areas within the City
where the designations would allow two units or more per acre.
GEOLOGY
The project area is subject to significant regional seismic
hazards. Partial mitigation can be achieved by constructing
habitable structures in accordance with Unified Building Code
requirements. The approval of additional habitable structures
being exposed to regional seismic hazards is a significant and
unavoidable adverse impact. mitigation below a level of signi-
ficance cannot be achieved.
HYDROLOGY
Additional units that would have to rely ars this ground water
basin would worsen the potential overdraft and is considered
cumulatively significant based on existing data. At this point
no specific mitigation is feasible, but at some paint in the
future it might be possible to offset local water consumption
impacts by importing water. The feasibility and acceptability of
this measure as mitigation would have to be investigated
separately and in the future.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
The habitat most suitable for the horned lizard occurs in the
alluvial flatlands and adjacent to the major creed. channels. The
highest density residential development (1 unit/acre) has been
focused in these areas. The potential loss o individual horned,
lizards and the cumulative loss of several hundred acres of
habitat is considered a potentially unavoidable, significant
adverse environmental impact.
AIR QUALITY
Because the project contributes emissions that exceed New Source
Review emission thresholds without providing any offsets and
because these emissions cumulatively contribute to air pollution
levels in the SCAB that continue to violate state and federal air
quality standards, the project is determined to have a, cumulative
significant adverse impact on air resources within the SCAB.
NOISE
On Vivo Oak Canyon Road where westbound traffic from the Landmark
project may raise traffic noise levels significantly, the
proposed Plan Amendment traffic would contribute a minor amount
to this potential cumulatively significant impact.
SOLID WASTE
There is aproblem with solid waste disposal within the entire
valley area: of the County. The County's landfills are quickly
filling to capacity, and there are presently no sufficient
alternatives to deal with the trash when the present capacity is
exhausted. The nearest County facility to 'Redlands is the San
Timoteo- landfill which will soon be one of only two permitted
County landfills in the valley. It has projected.: lifetime until
only the year 2000 leo other landfill sites have yet been
selected or purchased, :but the County recognizes the need for
future sites and has established a fund to locate and acquire new
sites.
F
The time available to provide the new capacity that will be
needed by the County and perhaps in the future for the City of
Redlands is growing> short. The site selectiont acquisition,
review and approval process, and construction of a slid waste
disposal facility takes six to ten years. The cumulative waste
disposal requirements within the City contribute to this signifi-
cant issue which can be mitigated by developing and implementing
an adequate waste management system for the time period after the
year 2600. Failure to provide such facilities would result in a
significant adverse impact on the environment.
of the five alternatives evaluated in the Environmental Impact
Report, only the no project/no development alternative would
result in less impact in each of the < above categories than
General Plan Amendment No. 38 . The no, project/no development,
alternative would require the city to purchase all property i
the study area to remedy private property rights issues.
Purchase of the 212661 acres of the General plan Amendment No. 38
study area is beyond the fiscal capacity of the City of Redlands.
Therefore, the City Council finds that specific economic and
social considerations rake infeasible project alternatives
identified in the Final EIR. The City
Council also finds that the benefits of General Plan Amendment
To. 38 outweigh the potentially unavoidable adverse environmental
effects because the number of dwelling units allowable under
current regulations would be reduced from a range of 11835-1,791
(ETR-p.11) to a range of 841-1,047. (GPA No. 38) .
The potentially unavoidable adverse environmental impacts are,
therefore considered acceptable in accordance with the City of
Redlands local guidelines for implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act.
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 15 h day of December, 1987 .
Mayor of. the City of Redlands
Cr`t Clerk
;f
, Lorrie Payer, City Clerk, City of Redlands, hereby certify
that the foregoing statement was duly adopted by the City Council
at a regular meting thereof held on the 15th day of December,
1987 the following vote
AYES: Cou:ncilmembers G ormser, Cunningham
Mayer Beswick
GEENone
ABSENT; Counci.lmember DeMir yn
ABSTAIN Counctilm.emb :r Johnson
C C >erk
F{
BEST, BEST & KBIE ER
A PARTNERSHIP P£7f ESSMNAL CORPORATIONS
LAWYER
OATMUR L.LITTLEWORTH W1 LLI AM W.F LOYD,JRk CARL F. HER'BOLrD:.. KAN€Y LEE ALLEN 400 MISSION SQUARE
GLEN E.STERH CN �' MICHAEL A.CRIT-E. STEPKANIE K.HARLAi'N ELISE K.TRAYNUM 3T5C}.UN�NII+ER$tl"f"Y AVENUE.
Wti IAM IL 0"YOLFE•.. GREGORY L.HA.ROKF MARC E.EMPEt DAVID A.PR'ANDEN•3 EitlRG:.
BARTON C.GAUT.�: KENDALL N.M.cVEY JOHN R.ROTTSCHAE'E.R WILLIAM LLIAM C3.CAHUNG.JFL POST C1FF 1GF. Box 1028.
CHARLES G•FSELD-,. CLARK H.AL$OP MARTN A,MUELLER YERESA J F'd2€SrOJKO'VsC. RIVEPSICE,CAL IFORNItA 92502
PAUL T.SELZER:- OAVRD J•ER4 fN- ,J.MICHAEL SUMMEi+CJwiR VICTORIA N,KiNG
UA-LL"S HOLMES, MICHAEL.J-ANGEL:SON HOWARD a.GOLDS GETTY.S.N.ASTON `ELEF�W{3 P7E}"77<E{686-X450
C HPISTc7PHEN CARPFNTERi DOUGLAS S,PHILLIPS* MARGARET F TANAKA MATT Hi MORRIS TEL C'OPHER(714)686-3083
mCHARD T.ANOERSONl CIA.ARLES M.ELL.IS' .,IEFFE.RY J.CRANDALL JEFFREY V.GUNN
.lz;%tN Ok W HLIeti- LANTS N E.E,LD R EDS SCOTT C.5MITH ;JAMES E.NFUER SLIPG
MICHACL C!.H.Ar:RRSS# IRWIN L•GOLDS LANCE .A.ADAIR STEVEN C.OrBAUN. GORDON GOL,C<;NE,4f COUNSEL
W.CURT F.ALY- ANTONIA G.WEINER LACK B.CLARE BRANT H.QV E6Rt N JAMES B,CORISON,OF`COUN SEL:
THOMAS S.SLOVAK*' GREGORY K,AHLKINSON .SEANNETTE A.PETERSON ERIC L.GARNER.
,1CTF?NI E.SROWN- WYNN:}E Sa FORTH. T'ERI L VOLNOGL.E. DENNIS M.COPA: FtaC.r4AR'G7 A.OS-ONS,Or COUNSEL.
d+„NA,.L£4,J.KOHUT DAV#U.[.,SARON BARBARA C.KRiSTA,. .a..I"CO Im-ZVI'OF.,NEVAOA.,.
MICHAEL T,RIDDELL. VIRGINIA A,ETT€N GER BRIAN NL LEW15 ..... WABN '0N,O.C.1 i,QUm Or CT.,S
MEREMTH A-JURY-... EUGENE TANAKA GEORGE H,CHA141 E3C:. –�-:
MICHAEL GRANT:s BASIL T„CHAPMAN RONALD A,VAN OLARCOM-
FRANCIS L.BAUM%. TIMOTHY M,.CONNOR BRADLEY E,NCUFELO OFFICES IN
ANNE IL THOMAS* VICTOR L•WOLF CECILIA S.WU RAYMOND BEST{iI568-1,957;.... PALM SPVHNSS[6iSIp 125-7254:
CA.MARTIN YNETHERY*... OANIEL E.OLIVIER MICHAEL L:HULME,JR, ,JAMES H.KRIEGER(I513-. 75j RANCRO MIRAGE.J6491560-2611
GFO GE M.REYES. DANIEL J-MCHUGH GEOFFREY K.WILLIS... EUGENE BEST(1843'1384). ONTARIO 1714).889.8564
*�.PRF=Ss.+nraLcc�Rraznt::am. SAN..i71CGG{ '47�457d915:
September 27 , 1988
L rrie Foy er
City Clerk
City of Redlands
30 Cajon Street
Redlands, California92373
Re, Resolution No . 4317 = Southeast Area General
Plan Amendment;
Dear Lorrie
Tease find enclosed a 'finalized vers n of Resolution No .
4317 which adopted Amendment Ivo.. 38 to the City of Redlands "
General Plan. 'there is no need for this resolution to go back
before the Citi Council as is incorporates all those changes made
by the Council to the draft General Plan Amendment back in 1987 .%
Once this resolution is signed by the Mayor , would you please
send an executed copy to:
Cary Lowe, Esq. ,
Nossam n, Cuthner , Knox & Elliott,
695 Town Center Drive , Suite 1630,
Costa mesa , California. 92626 ,
We have worked very closely with Mr . Lowe in preparing this
resolution and he is satisfied that it accuratelyreflects the
s
L
x
LAW OFF�CFS OF
BEST, BEST &-KRIEGER
Lorrie Poyzer
September 27 , 198
Page Two
actions taken by the Council and is Satisfactory to those
landowners he represents in the Southeast Redlands Area,-
Very truly yours,
Daniel J. McHugh
for Best , Best & Krieger
City Attorneys for the
City of Redlands
DJM/p
Enclosure
cc: John E. Holmes
f:
j'
4y
t�#
s 1<nsrimtts 7tt .i,..t ma47tt4tJrff�i,4t("11,"1Ii�t`,rl11.511���'t�#s`t',reit'�{
h
C;ty
i
e.
September 29 , 1988
Cary Lowe, Esquire
Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott
695 Town center Drive , Suite 1630
Costa Mesa:, California 92626
Dear Mr. Lowe
Enclosed is an executed copy of Resolution
No. 4317, a resolution of the City Council of
the City of Redlands adopting Amendment No; 38
to tine City of Redlands General Flan. Our City
Attorney Daniel J . McHugh asked that I forward
a copyto you.
Sincerely,
i
Lorrie Poyer
City Clerk
LPms
Enclosure
30 CAJON STREET P.0 BOX 2090 REDLANDS, CA 92373