HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_W-00tVATER
AND
IGATION INVOLVING
MILL -CREEK AND THE-*
M
ILL CREEK z ANJA
HORACE Po HINCKLEY.
1930
RIGHTS
n
FORM=
In oompiling data on the. distribution of the gravity crater from streezm
supplying the Obn Bernardino Valley for the Ban Bernardino Valley stater
Conaary on District I have had000asion to inveutigLte the present diattri.
bution of Mill Crook water apd: have found it quite m oomplioated syatem.
The history and lawauits sadjudica tang theF der rights baove• bean quite
Involved and this paper is merely a synopsis -of the principal f ootorm tle,.*
have had a part in the sstablishdng sa settling the sights to the surface
k C
and subsurface waters; origintiag in MillCree �on.
11-18-1�39 �o �c
WATER RIGHTS MW LITIGATION INVOLVING C�
MILL CREME AND THE DILL CREEL ZANJA
f Mill Creek, which flows into the Santa Ana River east
of Redlands, has had a more varied and troubled history than any
other stream in the San Bernardino valley. Twelve major lawsuits
besides many injunctions and stipulations govern the use of its
waters, the oldest water rights in San Bernardino County.
In 1819 the fathers of Mission San Gabriel induced the Indians
to dig a ditch or zan ja from a point two miles below the mouth
of hull Creek Canyon to the region formerly called Old San
Bernardino and now known as Bryn Mawr. This is a distance of
twelve miles, and although the builders took advantage of all
natural draws sad depressions, still it Was no small task to
construct suoh a waterway using, legend says, shoulder blades
of cattle for shovels and baskets for wheelbarrows.
From 1820 to 1834, Mill Creek Rater was used to irrigate
Mission grain fields in the vicinity of the San Bernardino
Asistenoia and the area immediately west then known as Guachama
Ranoheria. In 1634, unohristianized Indians attacked the so-
called Mission Indians, and the property and fields ihioh had
been irrigated by Mill Creek water were abandoned. wring the
next few years it is probable that the zan ja Was not. kept in
repair*
In 1839 Jose Del Carmen Lugo entered the San Bernardino
Valley with a permit to establish a colony. Because of Indian
hostility the colony failed. In 1841 Jose Del Carmen Lugo,
his two brothers Jose Maria and Vicente, and Diego Sepulveda
applied to the Me2ioan government f or a grant of eleven square
leagues of land. In their appl{ cation they described an area
embrading the entire San Bernardino end Yucaipa Valleys.
Starting at Slover 1"ountain near Colton, the boundary line ran
northerly to the mouth of Devil Canyon; thence easterly along the
base of the San Bernardino 1:ountains and southerly along the base
of the hills east of Yucaipa; thence westerly along the San Timoteo
hills back to Slover Mountain. This application whioh included
over eighteen leagues was granted but for only eight square leagues
to be selected from.the eighteen, together with an implied right
to the water of the dill Creek' Zanja. This right was issued by
the Mexioan government in June 1842 and the title was confirmed by
the Unite& States land Commission for California in February 1853.
Patent was issued in 1865.
The next development in the use of Mill Creek water
followed the arrival of the Mormons in June 1851. Elders Amasa
M. Lyman and Charles C. Rich, o olony leader+ppointecl by the Mormon
ahuroh, purchased this land grant from the three Lugo brothers and
Sepulveda for 077,000. They thought they were buying all of the
land described in the application for the grant, approximately 819000
acres, and Were bitterly disa?ointed when they found that they Were
entitled to only eight leagues j or about 35,500 acres. Although
they oould choose 1he land they wanted it had to be oonneoted or all
In one unit. After several years they seleoted lands riparian to
Twin Creek, Warm Creek, the Dill Creek Zan ja in the San Bernardino
Valley and a tract including the moist lands of Yucaipa Valley.
Several families of the Mormons settled in the Bryn Mawr
area and they f ouad the can ja largely filled with brash and debris
through disuse. Through 1652 they used Water directly out of San
Tiiaoteo Creek but in the suoceeding year they repaired the Zanja
an& began using Mill Creak water. In October 1851 the mother
ohurah recalled the oolony to Utah but some of the families preferred
to stay as they.had built permanent homes along the lower and of the
zanja.
41
In the early stages of settlement land was available at
small cost and with the expansion of farms it was inevitable that
disputes should arise as to the amount of water to which each man
was entitled. The year 1856 was evidently a relatively dry year
for water disputes caused so much friction that the matter was
referred to the Mormon Elderst Massaro Lyman and Rich. Tradition
has it that they allotted the time in the Mill Creek zanja in
accordance to the number of children in each family. They first
adopted an eight day schedule then later changed to a ten day
period.
The first
record of ownership
is lister
in an
exhibit in
Distriot
Court vase
.059 and is given as
fbilows:
The
ownership
after they had changed to a ten day schedule is given in the
Water Commissioners minutes fcw Peb. 2nd 1867 and is listed below.
1859
Owner
Carpenter Ranch
Ben Barton
Oliver Childers
James Rite
Alfred Bybee
Joseph Wilson'
Bushrod Wilson
John van $euven
Louise Van Leuven
B: Van Leuven
Anson Van Leuven
Bnasaigned
Oi`IMSEIP OP ZANJA
Hours
34.33
30.22
13.12
16.47
31085
8.24
2.75
8023
8023
16.47
21.95
....'* 14
1 ours -
8 days
1867
Owner
Carpenter Ranch
Ben Barton
'i. Curtis
Tuttle & Pishon
Prink
Joseph Wilson
B. W. Wilson
St. Clair
J. Cole
Z. Van Leuven
B. Van Leuven
A. Van Leuven
Hours f
60
36
17
17
18
13
12 ,
5
13
13
18
18
90`hours - -
10 days
Amongst the early settlers in Bryn 21awr was the Cram
family. Mr, John Cram besides using some water for irrigation had
a water wheel powered by a
drop,
in the zanja just west
of the
Asistencia; he j connoted
this
hater wheel to a lathe
for building
furniture. Cram realizing that possibly more fertile soil lay
near the foothills asked and was allowed to take his water right
f
• in the zanja with him to a point near what is now known as Grafton.
Cram had evidently moved there believing he was settling on government
land for when the Mormons included this area within the boundaries
of the Rancho San Bernardino he sold his water right and homesteaded
In Last Highlands. This ohange seemingly trivial at the time pro-
bably led to more litigation and trouble than any other single act
in the history of hill Creek water for it divided the water betweea
the upper or Crafton settlement and the lower or Bryn Mawr users.
In March 1858 Wr. Z. F. Carpenter purchased from the owners
of the San Bernardino Rancho a 320 acre tract bordering the zanja
lust east of what is now Wabash Avenue anti from Cram the right to
the use of zanja water. Carpenter immediately planted a vineyard and
grain crops and in the fall of 1860 an agreement was made between
him alone and the lower users giving his ranch exclusive rights
to the water from three o * clock until nine o'clock in the afternoon -
of saoh.day, it having been asoertained by practice that the effect
of closing off the flow above was not felt until six hours later
at the lower end - o f the zanja. By this arrangement the people
in Bryn Mawr or Old San Bernardino as it Was often called, were only
deprived of water at - night when they did not especially care for it.
Nine months after Carpenter purchased his ranch George
Crafts acting as agent for his brother Myron H. Crafts purchased
the land adjacent on the east. Mr. Crafts was especially enterpris-
ing in planting various kinds of crops and fruit trees trying to
find out what crops were best suited for the climate. During these
years in th.e early Gas there was suffioient water for all and Crafts
. simply took what he needed alth oagh he later claimed that he fell
heir to the rights of a squatter by the name of Wilson vLo had
settled previously on his property and had been using zanja water.
About a year after Carpenter settled on his ranch H. 23. Vliili'E
. 4-
moved to the property adjoining on the weste i"illis claimed a
riparian right to the zanja waters but tempered his use to the hours
of three to nine and then only used water which Carpenter allowed
to go by. Willis also used the waste water from the Carpenter
ranche AS was inevitable these upper. users, in increasing their
lands under cultivation had been taking more water so in 1864 the
lower users appealed to the district court (case .059 Barton at al
ve. Crafts and Willis) demanding that no water be diverted except
by the Carpenter ranch. The upper users as defendants claimed
that the zanja was a natural flowing stream on vAiioh they had
riparian rights and that they having used the water for more than
five yeare and worked in maintaining the diversion works at the
intake were entitled to continue using it* The defense also
claimed that the lower users had expanded the acreage under irrigation. -
by nearly one third and consequently that was 1hy they were short
of water. This case was tried in part on the bc-nks of the zanja,
the most vital point at issue was whether the zanja cord& be considered
a natural stream below the obviously constructed works at its
intake and henoe be sxb jeot to riparian rights. The court ruled
that the zanja was an artificial waterway and not smb jeot for riparian
use. It also sustained the agreement made in 1860 that no water
could be diverted for irrigation 'by the upper users except between
the hours of 3 to 9 P.M. (3 to 8 P. X* for the year 1864).
This case settled for a time the differences between the
upper and loner users but did not settle the apportionment between
the individual owner$. Of passing interest is the fact that in
1862, Anson Van Leuven, lining at the end of the zanja had the
California legislature pass a statue known looally as "Van Leuve2le
Duck Law" which required upper users along an irrigation ditch to
allow enough water to pass their place to supply stock and domestic
- t --_ 00 --- '" - - - - -- - • - - . .0 w i • -
Pursuant - t o an act passed by the legislature in 1854 a
board of rater commissioners was appointed in San Bernardino
County. This body of three men had jurisdiction in assigning the
water of the various gravity streams to their respective owners and
were charged with seeing that rightful division according to owner-
ship was carried out. Although functioning this board kept no
minutes of their meetings until 1864. To minimize expense the
zam j a owners allowed each man to divert the zanja in his turn and
no regular water master was employed.
The next dispute to be taken to court involved only the
upper users. Crafts filed in 1869 a suit against 0 ISCCoy (District
Court .97) then owner of the Carpenter ranch, in an attempt to
settle just how much of the 13 to 9 o'clock right belonged to him
and how much to X000y. They had each been _doing about an equal
share in the work of maintaining the zanja headworks after storm
damage and some years had shared the time on more cr less a 50 - 50
basis. The court ruled that Crafts had acquired an adverse right
due to continued usage and was entitled to 3/8ths of the water from
3 to 9 o'clock and MoCoy 5/8ths. The Willis ranch had been more or
less abandoned and was given only the waste water frcm the Carpenter p rater
ranch. In the f of lowing year tic C oy end others had to resort to
the court (Distrie t Court 411.1.17) to force .Crafts to complywith the e
Judgement of the- proceeding year, Crafts did not construct a
satisfactory division box to taXe *his 3/8ths of the flog and let
the rest .go by. The court altered its former decision so
as to allow
Crafts to have the entire flog of the zanja during the Period r
P f om
3 to 9 P. 11* for two days out Of every week and the Carpenter ranch
owners have the remaining five days.
The next dispute concerning Mill Creek water was Di
strict
t
Court case J230 when Ira leffingwelle Successor to the H. M# "Tillis
• property west of the Carpenter ranch sued all users above him ..
Crafts and owners of the Carpenter ranch - maintaining that under
the decree of case .057 he was entitled to all water in the 3 to
9 o' clock -right except for the two days of each week apportioned to
Crafts. Witnesses testified that the Willis place had been virtually
abandoned for over five years and any right which that property
may have had, had lapsed and the court ruled that such were the
facts and actually the only right appurtenant to the Willis property . _-
was the waste water from the Carpenter ranch.
The next record of trouble along the $an ja is in 1876
when both upper mad lower users on the zan ja appeared in court to
get an Injunction against it. H. Crafts (District Court #.323 Cave
at al vs. Crafts) acausing Crafts of diverting water at times
that he had no right to do so. Crafts only excuse was that some
water had been diverted by irresponsible employees. However it
was proved that Crafts was using more water than he was entitled
to and the court fined him as o ord ingly. Likewise in the suc o e e d-
Ing year action was again brought against Crafts (-District Court Q
.557) to make hits follow the previous oaairt decisions. '
The next litigation involved only the upper users.
UP Byrne successor to the Willis ranch just west of the Carpenter
place, sued the then owners -of the Carpenter ranch (Superior Court
#638, Byrne his. Crafts at We In August 1874, the Carpenter ran&
was owned by the five owners of the Southern Pacific Railroad
( Stanford, Crooker, Huntington, Hopkins and Colton) , J. P. Cave
and `d. Craig. However in 1876, C. R. Paine bought Craig's portion
and sometime prior to 18879 Me H. Crafts bought the Southern Pacific
share. The case started in 1883 when Byrne complained that
Whereas his ranch was entitled to the waste water of the Carpenter
ranch and said waste should amount to one third of the total diverted
by the Carpenter ranch but in recent years the oczaers had been
irrigating new lands not in the original 320 sores of the Carpenter
ranch and consequently Byrne was not receiving his fill quota of
waste water. The case was appealed to the State Supremea court and
in March 1890 the court ruled that all the zanja flow between 3 end
9 o'clock on five days of each week over and above 600 miner's
Inches - that being the amount deuced necessary to irrigate the
Carpenter ranch - belonged to Byrne. In the meantime Byrne had
purchased four hours of zanja water from lower users and the Carpenter
ranch people were restrained from interfering with the diversion
and delivery of this water in ditohes crossing their property to
the Byrne ranch.
In 1883, to further develop lends in the Ssn Bernardino
Valley, the Bear Valley Land and Water Company was formed. The
promoters of this company thought that by impounding the waters of
Bear Creek in the Bear Valley reservoir enough water would be avail-
able to supply not only the needs of the Redlands Highland area
but also the Uoreno Valley. One of the proposed features of the
Bear Valley project was a highline to divert the Santa Aria River
water at a point about two miles above the mouth of Santa
,Ana Canyon then by a ' series of open flumes sad tunnels carry this
water over to and across Mill Creek about one quarter of a mile
below the zanja intake. From there by pipeline the water oorssed
the lower end of the Yucaipa valley and thence to the projected
town of gllessandro in Moreno Valley. This later unit from
M33. Creek to Moreno Valley' was oohstruoted first and the Bear Valley
people made a deal whereby they could divert water from the zanja
.
at their JJJJVYJJ highline crossing then pay it back at the Redlands
canal crossing near the present Craft on school. This was taking
water out of the zanja at elevation 2250 anA paying it back at
Afier two years
elevation 1600. AThe lower zanja users, upon the advice of their
attorneys, protested this exohange of water. Consequently the
Bear Valley Irrigation Company successor to the Bear Valley Land
and Water Company was forced in 1692 to construct the. remaining
portion of their AW#1W1J9Vj# highline canal between Mill
Creek and the Santa Ana River. This eight mile link, now known
as the Gre enspot or Bear Valley highline was across. very rugged
terrain necessitating several long tunnels and inverted siphons.
It cost nearly one quarter of a million dollars and put the Bear
Valley Irrigation Company in serious financial difficulties.
The company went into bankruptcy in 1895 and no water was run
through the stretch between Santa Ana River and Fill Creek after
April 1899. The line Was later put in service by the Crafton
Heights Pipeline Co. sad. the Bear Valley rutual rater Company in 1910,
To definitely prevent the Bear Palley Land and water Company or the
Bear Valley Irrigation Company from interfering vi th Cw diverting
zsnja
Mill Creek water the lower use rs A May 1893 filed a complaint
Protesting any exchange of Waters (Supe ri ar Court §4938) . The c as e
never came to trial as evidently tree Bear Valley people realized
they had no rights to effect an exchange of water except with the
consent of all parties o onoe rned. The structures built on the
zanja at the Highline ana Redlands canal orosaing to effect this
exchange are 6ti11 in existence. After -the receiver had taken over
the op a rat ion of the Bear Vall 1y system the Moreno int ere st s had to
rent water on usually an annual basis from zanja owners, Luring
the dry years from 1896 to 1904 several of the lower users put
down wells and pumped water for their own use while 'they sold their
zanja water to 11oreno or Crafton users.
. In 1882 Crafts and others inoorporated the Crafton Land
sand plater company vhioh was followed in 1886 by the organization of
the present Grafton 'later Company. Owners of zanja water in` the upper
settlement transfered their rights in the zanja flow to the Crafton
Water Company at the rate of one hour of zanja flow every ten days
for seventeen shares of Crafton Trater Company stock. The company
enlarged the small reservoir built by Crafts to 68 acre feet
capacity (if spillway is closed it gill hold 105 acre feet).
1t its formation the Crafton Water Compsaty ovned 14.3% of the total
zanja flow, they now own 53.2f together with 140288 shares of
Bear Valley Mutual Water CompanyStockate- pa�ia� <<�u`���� of
. 8,1/ cd in 1174.. Cr;flbo owns 'V2AeY-
In June 1899 the owners of the zanja both in the upper` 'NIft
14 PH
and lower settlement sued the people. in Mill Creek canyon vuh o were 5*=R5'
using water out of Mill Creek (Superior Court J7680, Barton Land
& Water Co. at al vs. G. V4 Tyler at al). The plaintiff& (zanja
Owners) claimed that since 1853 theyhad used the flow of Mill Creek
to the extent of 3,000 miners inches at all times, sad that such
priority of possession gave them rights over any diversions by
settlers in Mill Creek canyon. 'This case was largely fought by
the Southern Pacific Railroad, as they, being owners of each alternate
section of land in the L-rill Creek watershed, were vitally concerned
as to the ownership of the water. In June 1902 the o oo rt ruled
that the zanja jj owners had established a right to 2 500 miners
inches of the flow of Mill Creek long prior to the land grant made
in 1871. to die Southern Paoifie Company, ffid as axoh the riparian
owners along Mill Creek had no right to interfere or diminish the
flow as long as 1here was less than 2, 500 miners inches at the
zanja intake.
1 similiar action ( Cave at al vs. Tyler) filed In 1894
and decided by the aomrt is 1902, stopped the owners of the land at
'ohs site of the presaLt Dolly varden Trout Farm on Mountain Home
Creak from diverting more than two inches of Water from Snow Creek
...10_
oienega or Mountain Home Creak to be used on the property. The
owners previous to 1902 ( Skinner then later Late Harvey), had been
using up to 15 inches to irrigate apple trees anti other crops and
the court held that any diminution of the flow under 2,500 miners..
inches at the sanja intake inflioted an injury on the zanja owners.
Concurrently with this cage action was broight in July 1899 by the
zanja owners against Mrs. L. Chamberlain (Spperi or Court Y7705 ).
Chamberlain was euooessor in interest to a ITr. Reed Who first settled
on a 60 sore tract about one quarter of a mile below the zanja intake;,
In. 1871.. The zanja owners in oonsideration of Reed's looking after
the zanja intake allowed him to use some Water but in 1874 protested
violently when he enlarged his fields and diverted more water from
the zauja than what he needed for his domestic use. bars. Chamber-
lain claimed that Reed first used five inches then in 1875 used
thirty inches and as suoaessor in interest she was entitled to -
thirty inches ¢ of water from . the zanja flow. The oourt rmled
in August 1900, that the zanja owners were owners of 3,000 inches
of ]dill Creek water end that bars. Chamberlain nor any of her
predecessors in interest had any right to the use of ?dill Creek
water.
The next quarrel affecting mill Creek water occurred between
the Grafton Water Company and the lower users. During the extremely
dry years of 1898 and 1899 the surface flow of Mill Creek at the
zanja intake dropped below 200 miners inches. This Seri oa sly
so
hampered the Grafton people JJ they approached the lower users
with the proposition of developing the subsurface flow of =11
Creek abore the
mouth of
the canyon. The
lower owners did not
feel that they
oomld put
more than $5,000
into XX such development
word:. The Crafton people realized that based on ownership their
share would only be 03, 000 anct the total 08,000 would not be
enou;h to defray the cost of the proposed development. .
Consequently the Crafton : ater Company on their own initiative
put down a shaft in Lill Creek canyon about 1, 000 feet above its
Xjj debouchure onto the debris cone. This well although 133 feet
deep pumped only 50 inches ant was never used ' except during 1899.
Before the completion of this well the. Craft on Water Company started
another shaft about three miles farther up the canyon at the
junction of Uountain. Home and Bill Creek near what is now Igo" s
corner. They dug a shaft 90 feet deep then branched into two drifts
one to the north 600 feet and the other to 'die south 65 feet.
They pumped 140 inches fran this dell. The Redlands Light and
Power Company furnished electric p6wer' for pumping gratis as the
water from this shaft Was disobarged into their canal and through
s2 and 41 generating plants. On the advice of their engineer's
Massaro Boggs and Tinkle, the Crafton Water Company constructed
flumes -to convey the surface water from a point 1200 feat above
each well. to below the well. By bypassing the surface flow in this
ma=er they hoped that their pumping would not affect the water - in
the creek. In 1906 suit was brought by the lower ,an ja owners
(Barton land and "dater Company at al v8. Crafton Water Company),
to stop the pumping of the wells in the canyon on the gro mnd that
it decreased the surface flog of mill Creek. Considerable field
work was done by both parties to ascertain Y&a.t effect this pumping
had on the stream flow Rnd a good deal of testimony was Riven by the
head engineers ( irA.$k for the lower zan ja owners, Finkle for the
Craft on dater Compa v) , on the hvdrol.ogv of X .11 Creek CA.nyon.
It was the decision of the o air t 3n )march 1907, that the surface
and subsurface waters of Mill, Greek were ome sad the same, that the
zmbt e=anean waters were not separated by any impenetrable strata;
- -12-
and inasmuch as the subsurface waters were a part and parcel of the
waters of M111 Creek they belonged to the zanja os+ners and the
Crafton stater Company had no right to develop them for their
exclusive use. This decision stopped all development work in
Will Creek until 1927 when the zanja' owners through an organization
known as the Mill Creek Owners installed a pump on the old well by
Igoe and then proceeded to drill another well about two miles
farther up Mill Creek Canyon. Toe expense of this organization
has been borne by all the zan ja owners, there being only 20 minu'tes
out of the total 240 hours that has not joined in the cost of inoreas-
ing the water sapply, g third well was put d cmin in 1929 approx.
imately one mile above the mouth of Dill Creek Canyon. This well
was equipped with a submersible motorpump and was completely buried
in the March 1938 flood. These welts have been pumped every year
since 1927 with the exception of 1938 when there was sufficient
gravity water to maintain normal delivery. During g the past twelve'.,
years the Mill Creek Owners, have purchased several large tracts of
land in Mill Creek Canyon and spaat over $400000 in pipelines and
development work.
Another oase involving Mill Creek water was decided in
1903 and grew out of the fact that in 1892 an agreement was signed
between the sanja owners and the Redlands Electric Light and Power
Company allowing the latter to construct a pipeline and use the waters
of Mill Creek for the generation of electric power. The power
company proceeded to build a plant and lay 79250 feet of pipe with
2,000 miners inches oapaoity. Their intake being at the mouth of
the oanyon and the plant .about one quarter of a mile above the
sanja intake. This prevented a large decrease in the stream flow
due to seepage and evaporation lose sad was olearly to the advan-
tags of the zanja owners. Previously in 1885 the zanja owners had
started the oonstruction of a rubble lined ditoh to oonvey the
summer flow from the mouth of the canyon to the intake, but a
• storm destroyed a large part of the ditoh and water was anly oarried
in it 'a part of the sumruer of 1886. •A seotion of this old ditch
is- atilt intaot below the Edison powerhouse at the mouth of the
oaayon. The Menton Irrigation Company organized in 1687 Was the
owner of a tunnel end a system of auto and ditohes together with
two springs about 0, 39800 feet below the zanja intake from whiah
they tapped the underground water in the ]dill Creek ohaxmel.
The tunnel had been started in 1885 end by 1896 had been extended
a distance of 1,300 feet from 'its mouth. Before 1893 its flow
varied from 30 to 125 inches, but in 1899 ' sad- 1900 the Montane
Irrigation Company drilled a well about 1,000 feet south of the
tunnel • aad when it Was pumped there was no water at all in the tunnel.
The Montane Irrigation Company sued the Redlands Eleotrio Light and.
Power Company and the zanja ovn era ( Sup eci or Court #7884) olaiming
that by o onfining the Mill Creek water to an Impervious pipeline
they prevented the saturation of the soil and 'consequent replenish -
meat of the underground water* The oourt held that inasmuch as
the zanja owners right to 2,500 miners inobse antedated by many
years the tunnel Bid. Works of the Mentone Irrigation Company and
inasmuch ae the power o ampanay as a riparian proprietor was only
exeroising its right of taking the Mill Creek water from the stream
and then returning the same water again undiminished in quantity or
ow,t
quality, The lower underground water developers had no redress.
This case allowed the power interests to prooeed in the
further development of eleotrio power on Mill Creek. Ploat #2
-.taking the water out of Mill Creek at its junotian with Mountain
Rome stream and running the water through turbines at a power house
As, soon as this was finished another oanal and penstock was build
Ift diverting the Mill Creek Rater Not below Forest Home. The generators
for #3 unit are in the same building as #2 unit at the mouth of the
oanyon. Simultaneously with this development of the Redlands
Light sad Power Company later the Southern -California Edison
Company Mr. Baldwin of Claremont filed on the power rights to Mill
Creek ab oire Forest Home. In 1915 Mr. Van Zandt made a survey and
plaza for the diversion of High Creek, Vivian and Falls Creek,
In 1920 the Southern] Sierras Power Company now the Nevada California
Eleotrio Corporation beoame interested in the pro jeot. They seoured
State aad Federal Power Commission permits to prooeed with the +
development and started work on a hydroeleotrio generating plant
at Forest Home. This plant wauld operate under 2,063 feet of head
and seoure ester from the abov-e mentioned tributaries of Mill
Creek. After Intermittent work and extension of development time
the prro jeot was definitely abandoned in 1931 due to the low Cost of
generating power by other means and Improved transmission i teoh.
nique made it more soonomioal to aeoure BoQlder Dam power rather
than oontinue with this pro jeot.
By 190T the rights to
Mill Creek
water were
fairly well.
' established and tie owners were
oantent to
let things
remain in
status quo. It was evident to all that ms enormous loss took plaoe
because of the 3.2 miles of open unlined ditch between Crafton and
the lower users. As one oeaaer put it there was always plenty of
money to fight lawsuits but none to improve the ester supply.
Improved pumping machinery made it more •oonomioal for many of the
lower users to secure their water from wells and sell their Eiill
Creak water to parties In the Crafton area. In 1925 ten hours ' of
The sanja flow were purohased by the Moreno interests. These
hours were exchanged for Craft on Water Company stock so that in
1R_
sotual operation Moreno reoeives Bear VaXley water due the Crafton
w
Water Company on their stook ownership in the Bear Valley Mutual
Water Company. In 1929 the Santa Ana River Development Company,
an Orange County organization, filed suit end a stipulation was
entered into
governing
the amount of
dill Creek arc other water
from the San
Bernardino
Valley which
can be exported to Moreno.
This stipulation limits the quantity to 2,131 sore feet per annum.
The City of Redlands in the spring of 1926 voted a $5250000
bond issue to buy rights to hill Creek water. They approaohed the
owners of
Mill Creek water ,f/f/
below Redlands with two
alternatives.
One known
as option B was to sell their water for $p5, 000
an hour
(1/240th of the perpetual flow of the zanja) then the City would
guarantee to supply them with pumped water at cost and whenever the
remaining users were not taking the fOl 210500 inches then they
could have Mill Creek water at ten oents per day inch* The area
on which this water can be used was outlined end roughly inoluded
all the area east of Mountain View Avenue between Colton and Barton
Avenues up to California Street then the area between Citrus Ave.
and Barton Ave. to Tennessee Ste than a small irregular blook
ad jaoent to the zanja up to Texas St. This 6ption only applied to
property viL thin this speoified distrio t ama also the owner or his
.. assigns must have had rights to zanja water. Up to 1937 the City
furnished water to any property within this epeoifiedd, distrio t at
the same oost but this has now been changed so some are paying the
50o per day inch irrigation rate for oit y water while others under
the B oontraots pay about 30 cents. The other alternative known
as option A was simply
a o-ontraot
that
the olty would perpetually
deliver water to zanja
owners but
would
allow the o i ty to abandon
the open di toh and use pipelines. Although none of the zanja owners
Signed this option A the City prooe eded to replace the zanja with
a pipeline and to date no dispute has been raised beoause of this
sot.
Purchase of the major portion of the lower sanja rights
and abandonment of the open di toh involved --the City in a o onfliot
with several of ti►e upper users.
With the oonstruotion of the Grafton
Water Company reservoir in 1886 the largest portion of the water
belonging to the upper users was diverted into the reservoir at a
point
approximately
one mile below the
sanja
intake. However
nc.
Paine
as the owner
of the old Carpenter
ranch
and Col. Pieroe
as
owner of the Crafts home phaos oontinued to pperate their diversion
gates on the dot of 3
o' olook
thus appropriating
a1.1
the water in
the sanja between the
Grafton
reservoir headgate
and
their diversion
gates a distanoe of more than a mile. Through the years this praotioe
had never been protested hens they had gains& a right to this water. '
also on the old Crafts plaoe a knothole iu the diversion gate had
• been allowed to divert water as long as there was water in the
$anja• A oitisens oommittee o wposed of Thomas Sanborn, George
Humphrey and H. H• Garetin were appointed to compromise these rights.
. They
evaluated
1h a Paine
right as equal
to about 20 minutes of
water
each day
or in the
ten day period
three an& one half hours of
sanja flow. He was paid aoo ordingly for the water ($b, 000 per h our) .
To Col. Pieroe th ey allotted 300 day inohe s . of water eaoh month to
be used exolusively on the 17.9 sores ad jaoent to the diversion.
Prior to 1h a purohase of Mill Creek water the City of
Redleads had beoome interested in Mill Creek as a souroe of water
supply. Up to 1921 the only works on the Mill Creek Debris Cone
below the sanja intake were the above mentioned Menton Irrigation
Company tunnel and two ad jaoent wells one on the north, the other
south of the tunnel and, also two wo ll a co nnoo te& to a short tunnel
-17-
•.i
at the site of what was called Ge roan Springs about 2, 000 feet
northeast of Rooky Comfort. These lower wells together with several
hundred acres of lend had belonged to the Menton Lend and Citrus
Company but had passed into the hands of the mortgagor, the Great
Republic Life Insurance Company. In 1921 Mr. George Humphrey
promoted a plan to -further develop the underground waters on the
Mill Creek debris oone. He secured an option on approximately
1100 acres of land and had the ooar t adjudicate the amount of water
the owners in the existent works were entitled to. The oourt
stipulated that the Menton Irrigation Company and others who had
bought into these works were entitled to a total of 121 miners
inches perpetual flow. The East Lugonia Mutual water Company
was then incorporated and they boaght a 3/4 interest in the 19100
acres, the City of Redlands buying the other 1/4 interest in the
property. 7he old tunnel was re o onstruo tee sad extended and two
wells drilled near its head* water from the tunnel and these two
wells was conveyed by a steel pressure pipe to a series of three
other
wells spaced
about one
mile apart down the
Mill Creek debris
oone.
It was first
planned
to operate the pumps
in these t1ree
lower wells, by water wheels bat other than in extremely wet years
there was not ouffioient water to supply the 121 inohe s prior right
and run the turbines too so they were replaced by electric motors.
Through experience the company found that there water supply in the
summer months depended primarily on the amount of water vuSich o ould
be spread azxl stored in the debris come during the winter. In the
dry years of 19300 934 and j 136 very little water was available for
spreading and oonsequently • the mirmer flow from the tunnel was not
even sufficient to supply the 121 inches of prior right. Besides
this some 20 other wells were drilled by owners on proper ty adjacent
-18-
to that
of the East Lugoni a Mutual Water Company and these all
drew
on
the Same underground
water basin. These two factors, dry
Years in vi ioh they had to maintain a prior
right delivery and the
pumping
by adjacent wells forced
this campany into bankrupoy and
to date
no settlement has been
worked out.
At the present time
ownership of the Will Creek san j a
is as
follows:
0MTERSH IP
OF ZANJA
1939
Craft
Omer
on ester Company
Hours
127 * 50
127 31 ham' �
City
of Redlands
92*65
9z 39
J.
i<.
Cole estate
405
.30
G.
We
Curtis
490
�
H.
Porch
200
2
Be
J,
Co
J.
Curtis estate
Curtis
290 _
2*0
R
J.
E.
Davis Estate
1.0
H.
We'
Cole
1.0
L.
C.
0.
S•
Yount
Ylitohell
100
44
S.
G.
Batchelor
105
r 3 0
•
A •
Young
. 07
F
Its.
Perry
Jones
* 2b
.17
ls,
!D
hours
i
,
i
ITM NOT INCWDEU 1H ICH IT MIGHT BE WISH TO SAY SCURTHING ABOUT
FALIUVAIZ MUIIJAL SERVICE CMZPANY and other users up in the mountdiaa
PRES8�i3T OPERATION OF Z&NJA WATER Method of renting old toen uater to Moreno
and Menton uevse (Pinoh deal) or renting scene In Bryn Maur in acupetion
with the City (Porch deal)
OLD ROBERTO' TUNML AND PRFSERX RENTING AND DI"AWION OF ZANJA ABOVE ITS
INTAE$ BY THE BAST jaMa ORANGE CO•
F D= AND DROUGHTS ON CIMEK Mx inum end at___.l um !lows of orsoY•
BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MATERIAL
W&TER SPRp.A13 = AD TO nM= SUIT.
ITS xo=zmwu ao(yu im Jo Ri*aos Yrxn
XMM oz Sara lima on f)Rrmng asa • axeozoo .Mlvza vrKn 1
lb
ry
lAF^
Ab
•• �. i� Ste- —iii v � +..•».
lop
• �* ram. �.. r ••` ,. '� _ ,.. 1� . ,`,.,. • 1
� s• r. !
zfiNlWOQ Ma'007 6261 mmoaoo mmia vroz
' V
r
I� CA � y � ���
ter. ���.• ,•"- !� ,_ ''- fi• �`�• ' �``'.r.• � /
Fv—
�', •.. • V .- _/r��+ - . _ Ate^ ` .
� f
fo.