HomeMy WebLinkAbout4757_CCv0001.pdf SOLUTION NO. 4757
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS,
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS
INTENTION VY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1991-92 IN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1.
AN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; DECLARING THE WORK TO BE OF
MORE LOCAL THAN ORDINARY PUBLIC BENEFITS SPECIFI'YING THE
EXTERIOR BOUNDARIES OF THE AREAS WITHIN LANDSCAPE' MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1 TO BE ASSESSED COST AND EXPENSE T OF
DESIGNATING SAID DISTRICT AS LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 1#0 AND DETERMINING THAT THESE PROCEEDINGS
SHALL BE TAXES PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
ACT OF 1972: AND OFFERING A TIME CE FOR
HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
The City Council sof the City of Redlands , pursuant to the
provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 , being
Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, does resolve as follows :
Description of Work
SECTION 1. That the public interest and convenience requires and
it is the intention of the City Council of the City of Redlands,
California, to orderthe following work be done, to wit.
1.- Maintenance and servicing of facilities and landscaping
as authorized by Section 22525 of the Streets and
Highways Cade,.
2. Any and all work and materials appurtenant thereto or
which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance and
servicing thereof,.
Location of Work
SECTION 2 . The foregoing described: word' is to be located within
the following areas.
1. Right-of-way way and easements nts (area along the Wabash Avenue
frontage of Tract 13282 , the San Bernardino Avenue
frontage of Tract 13434 and the Allesandro Road frontage
of Tract 13496) more particularly described on a map
which is on file in the City Clerk's office, entitled
"Proposed Boundary Map , " to Landscape Maintenance
District No. 111.
4
2.. Right-of-Way and easements along the San Bernardino
Avenue frontages of Tracts 13745 and 13765 more
particularly described on maps which are on file in the
City Clerk's office entitled, "Annexation No. 1 to
Landscape Maintenance District, No 1"-.
3. Right-of-Way and easements along the Reservoir Road
frontage of Tract; 13947 more particularly described on
maps which are on file in the City Clerk's office'
entitled, "Annexation No. 2 to Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1"
4 . Right-of-way and easements along the Lugonia Avenue,
Bryn Mawr avenue and Interstate 10 freeway frontages of
Parcel Map 11917 more particularly described on maps
which are on file in the City Cleric's office entitled
"Annexation No. 3 to to Landscape Maintenance District
No. 1'"
5.. Right-of-sway and easements along the various frontages of
MS 185, MS 178, Parcel Map 12061, Parcel Map 12300 CUP
382, CRA 6066, CRA 486, CCP 253, CRA 608, CUP 51.9, CUP
515, CUP 518, CUP 522, CUP 521, CRA 605, MS 183, MS 182,
CUP 278, CUP 405, CRA 354, CRA 346, CRA 60' , Tract 12461
and Parcel Map 12022 more particularly described on maps
which are onfile in the City Clerk's office entitled
"Annexation No. 4 to Landscape Maintenance District No.
toe
6. Right-of-way and easements along the various frontages of
MS 188, MS 189, Tract 1455+6, CRA 611, MS 196, MS 195, CRA
615 and CPA 536 more particularity described: on maps
which are on file in the City Clerk's office entitled
"Annexation No. 5 to Landscape Maintenance District No.
Ill.
Description of Assessment District
SECTION 3 . That the contemplated work., in the opinion of said City
Council, is more specific and local than ordinary public benefit
and the said City Council hereby makes the expense of the said work
chargeable upon a district, which said district is assessed to pay
the costs and expenses thereof, and which district is described as
follows.
5
1. All that certain territory of the City of Redlands
included within the exterior boundary line shown upon
that certain "Proposed Boundary Map Landscape Maintenance
District No. 111, heretofore approved by the City Council
of said City by Resolution No. 4259, indicating by said
boundary line the extent of the territory included within
the proposed assessment district and which map is on file
in the office of the City Clerk of said City.
2. All that certain territory of the City of Redland
included within the exterior boundaries line shown upon
that certain "Map of Annexation No . 1 Landscape
Maintenance District No. 111, heretofore approved by the
City Council of said. City by Resolution No. 4366 ,
indicating by said boundaries line the extent of the
territory included within the proposed assessment
district and which map is on file in the Office of the
City Clerk of said City.:
3 . All that certain territory of the City of Redlands
included within the exterior boundaries line shown upon
that certain "Map of Annexation No . 2 Landscape;
Maintenance District No. 1'°, heretofore approved by the
City Council of said City by Resolution No . 4498 ,
indicating by said boundaries line the extent of the
territory included within the proposed assessment
district and which map is on file in the Office of the
City Clerk of said City.
4 . All that certain territory of the City of Redlands
included within the exterior boundaries line shown upon
that certain "Map of Annexation No . 3 Landscape
Maintenance District No. 111, heretofore approved by the
City Council of said.. City by Resolution No . 4562"
indicating by said boundaries' line the extent of the
territory included within the proposed assessment
district and which map is on file in the Office of the
City Clerk of said City.
S. All that certain territory of the City of Redlands
included within the exterior boundaries line shown upon
that certain "Map of Annexation No . 4 Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1", heretofore approved by the
City Council, of said City by Resolution No . 4629
indicating by said boundaries line the extent of the
territory included within the proposed assessment
district and which map is on file in the Office of the
City Clerk.; of said City.
6. All that certain territory of the City of Redlands
included within the exterior boundaries line shown upon
that certain "trap of Annexation No. 5 Landscape
Maintenance District No. ill, heretofore approved by the
City Council of said City by Resolution No. 4711,
indicating by said boundaries line the extent of the
territory included within the proposed assessment-
district and which map is on file in the Office of the:
City Clerk of said City.
Reference is hereby made to said maps for further, full and more
particular description of said assessment district, and the said
maps so on file shall govern for all details as to the extent of
said assessment district.,
Report of Engineer
SECTION 4 The City Council of said City by Resolution No. 4756
has approved the report of the Engineer of Work which indicates the
amount of the proposed assessment, the district boundary,
assessment zones, detailed description of improvements and the.
method of assessment. The report titled "Engineer's Report,
Landscape Maintenance District Not 1 1991-92 Fiscal Year", is on
file in the office of the City Clerk of said City and was prepared_
for the. 1991-92 Fiscal Year. Reference to said report is hereby
made for all particulars for the amount and extent of the
assessments and for the extent of the work.
Collection of Assessments
SECTION 5. The assessment shall be collected at the time and in
the same manner as County taxes are collected. The Engineer of
Work shall file a report annually with the City Council of said
City and said Council will annually conduct a; hearing upon said
report at their first regular meeting in June, at whish time
assessments for the next fiscal year will: be determined.
Time and Place of Hearing
SECTION 6. Notice is hereby given that on the 4th slab of Fuse,
1991, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at 212
Brookside Avenue, in the city of Redlands, any and all persona
having any objections to the work or extent of the assessment
district, may appear and show cause why said work should not be
done or carried out in accordance with this Resolution of
Intention. The City Council:; will consider all oral and written
protests.
Landaeapinq and Lighting Act. of 1972
SECTION 7 All the work herein proposed shall be done and carried
rough, in pursuance of an act of the legislature of the State of
California designated the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1372,
being Division 15 of the streets and Highways Code of the State of
California.
Publication of Resolution of Intention
SECTION 8Published notice shall be made pursuant to Section 606
of the Government Code. The publication of notice of hearing shall
be completed at least 10 days prior to the date of hearing.
Certification
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adaption of this
Resolution.
"PROVED AND ADOPTED this 21st day of May, 1991.
J
J
ATTEST
` -
DEP TY CITY ' LER �
CITY OF REDLANDSr CALIFORNIA
ENGI LR O" 0 REPORT FOR
LANDSCAPE KAINTENANCS DISTRICT NO. 1
1991-92 FISCAL YEAR
SECTION 1 Authority for Report
This report is prepared by order of the City Council of the City of
Redlands Resolution Number 4736. The report is in compliance with
the requirements of Chapter 1, Article 4, Division 15 of the Street
and Highways Cade, State of California (Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972) .
SECTION 2 General Description
The City Council has heretofore elected to farm Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 consisting sof the permanent landscaped
areas along the Wabash Avenue frontage: of Tract 13282, the San
Bernardino Avenue frontage of Tract 13434 and the Allesandro Road:
frontage of Tract 13496. The Council has also heretofore elected
to annex the permanent landscaped improvements along the perimeter
streets of the following development into Landscape Maintenance
District No. 1.
1. Annexation No. 1 The San Bernardino ,Avenue frontage of
"Tracts 13748 and 13765.
2 - Annexation No. 2 The Reservoir Road frontage of Tract
13347.
3 . Annexation No. 3 - The Lugonia Avenue, Bryn 'Mawr Avenue
and Interstate 10 frontages of 'Parcel. Map 11917.
:. Annexation No. 4 Various streets included within M
188, MS 178, Parcel. Map 120361, Parcel. Map 123030, CUP 382,
CRA 6037, CRA 486, CUP 253, CRA 6038, CUP 519, CUP 616, CUP
518, CUP 522, CUP521, CRA 6015, MS 183, MS 182, CUP 278,
P 475, CRA 354 , CRA 346, CRA 607 Tract 12461 and parcel
Map 120122.
. Annexation No. 5 Various struts included within MS
188, MS 189, Tract 14556, CRA 61.1, MS 196, MS 198, CRA
615 and CRA 536.
The City Council has determined that the areas to be landscaped
will have an affect upon all lots within the original district and
the annexatio ns to the district. All landscaped areas are
portions of easements or roadway right-of-way previously granted to
the City of Redlands.
SECTION 3. Plains and Specifications
The plans and specifications for the landscaping either have been
or are being prepared by the. developers. The plans and specifi-
cations for the landscaping will be in conformance with the
requirements of the City Planning and Community Development-
partment.
Reference is hereby made to the subject tract maps, developments
and assessment diagrams for the exact location of the landscape
areas. The plans and specifications by reference are hereby made a
part of this report to the same extent as it said plans and
specifications were attached hereto.
SECTION 4. Improvements
The developers of Tracts 13434, 13745, 13765, 13282, 13496, 1394"
and Parcel Map 1.1917 have installed the landscaping improvements.
These locations may be located on the reduced copies of the
assessment diagrams included, within the formation report and
Annexations 1, 2 and 3. Landscaping is not presently planned to be
maintained at any other locations in Landscape Maintenance District
No. 1.
The City Staffis presently developing procedures for inspection,
acceptance and maintenance of the landscaping improvements. It is
anticipated that the City Forester will be the individual assigned
the overall responsibility.
SECTION S. Estimated Maintenance Costs
It is anticipated` that the. City will contract for maintenance
services on the landscaping improvements. The City's record-
keeping will be required to be sufficiently accurate to detail the
expenses so that these costs may be recaptured through assessments.
Cue to the restrictions placed upon municipal budgets through the
passage ofJarvis-Gann and the lag between the time assessments are
'made and revenues are collected by the City, it is appropriate that
assessments be made in advance of the anticipated expenditures to
provide working` capital for the maintenance effort.. This method
will be used for all developments which have had final tract maps
filed. In this case it is reasonable to expect these landscaping
improvements to be completed within the 1991- 2 :discal Year.
- 10
Developments not likely to have landscaping improvements completed
during the 1991-92 fiscal year, specifically those not having final
tract maps or other development plans filed at this> time, should
not have assessments levied on them for maintenance. There i
however, eine exception. Since the district does need to levy
assessments to recapture a portion of the casts involved in the
preparation of the annual report-, there will therefore be an
assessment levied on Annexation No. 4 and 5 for the annual report.
Developments that had assessments levied previously but which have
not yet had landscaping improvements installed should not be
assessed this fiscal year providing their fund balance is
sufficient.
The fallowing assessments include casts or balances accumulated to
date, and estimated costs for the 1991-92 Fiscal year for the
landscaping to be maintained by Landscape Maintenance District No.
1
Landscapes Xaintenance District No. 1 -> Tracts 13282, 13434 and
13496 (original District: Formation)
Tract 13282 (38 lots) (City Designation: original District 1-
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance - $2,783
Water & Electric = 2,104
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 250 $5,133
Incidental Expenses
Department Administration = $5,462
General Administration 3,274
Engineering 857 $9, 593
1.991-92 Estimated Casts $14,72+
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 5,914
1.991-92 assessment $10, 818
Tract 13434 (78 lags) (Citi' Designation: Original District 1-B)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance $3,670
Nater & Electric 2, 100
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 2501 $6,420
Incidental Expenses
Department Administration - $5,462
General Administration -- 3 , 274
Engineering 857 $9,593
1991-92 Estimated Caste $15, 613
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 7,536
1991-92 Assessment $10,077
Tract 13496 (9 lots) (City Designation: Original District 1-C)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance - $13,518
Water & Electric - 2, 100
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 250 $15,868
Incidental Expenses
Department Administration -- $5,462
General Administration - 3 ,274
Engineering 857 $9,593
.1991...-92 Estimated Costs $25,461
Estimated June 30 Fund. Balance 7,536
1991-92 Assessment $19, 925
- 12 -
Annexation No. 1 - Tract 13745 (38 lots)
(City Designation*. Annexation I-A)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance~
Contract Maintenance $40216
Water & Electric2, 10
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 250 $6,566
Incidental Expenses
Department Administration $5,462
Genera: Administration 3,274
Engineering 657 $9,593
1991-92 Estimated Costs $16,159
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 685
1991-92 Assessment $17,474
Annexation No l - Tract 13765 (25 lets)'
(City Designations Annexation 1-B)
1991_92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance = $2 ,954
Water & Electric - 2,10
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair - 250 $5,304
Incidental Expenses
Department Administration $5,462
General Administration on , 274
Engineering 857` $9,593
1991-92 Estimated Costs $14 ,897
Estimated June 30 Frond Balance 1,787
1.991-92 Assessment $14,897
- 13
Annexation No. 2 - Tract 13947 (35 lots)
(City Designation#* Annexation -A)
1991-92Fiscal Year
Maintenance
contract Maintenance $7,489
Water & Electric 2,100
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair = 250 $9,839
Incidental Expenses
Department Administration $5, 462'
General Administration 3, 274
Engineering 857 $9,593
1991-92 Estimated Costs $19,432
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 11,19+6
1991-92 Assessment $10,236
Annexation No.3 - Parcel Map 11917 (5 lots)
(City Designation: Annexation 3-A)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance $11, 592
Water & Electric 2, 100
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 250 $13,942
Incidental Expenses
.Department Administration $ 5,4612
General Administration 3,274
Engineering 857 9,593
1991.-92 Estimated Costs $23,535
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance <3, 8
1991.92 Assessment $28,943
Annexation No. 4-A . KS 18S (4 lots)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance _ $
Water & Electric
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering = 131
Contingency 131
1991-92 Estimated Costs 131
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 0
1991-92 Assessment; 131
Annexation No. 6-8 X8 178 ( q lots)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance
Water & Electric 0
"vandalism &: Sprinkler Repair _ C 0
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering = 326
Contingency 0 32
1991-92; Estimated Casts 326
Estimated ,Tune 30 Fund Balance, 0
1991.-92 Assessment 326'
Annexation No. -+C Parcel Map 12061 (6 lots)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance _ 0'
Water & Electric 0
"vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0 0
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering = 196
Contingency - 0 196
1991-92 Estimated Costs 196
Estimated. June 30 Fund Balance
199192- Assessment 1.96
exation No. -D - Parcel Map 1.2300 (3 lots)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
- 1
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance C
'dater & Electric
"Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0 0
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering 98
Contingency 0 98
1991-92 Estimated Costs 98
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance
1991_92 Assessment 9'
Annexation No* 4- - CUP 382 (2 lots)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance C
Water & Electric
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0 C
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering $ 65
Contingency 0 65
199192 Estimated Costs $ 65
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 0
1991-92 Assessment $ 65
Annexation No. 4-F CRA +606 (1. lot)
199192 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance $
Fater & Electric
'vandalism & Sprinkler Repair - 0 C
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering = $ 33
Contingency C 33
1991-92 Estimated Costs t
--
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance f
1991_92 Assessment $ 33
Annexation ` * 4-0 - CRA 486 (1 ;lot)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance
'dater & Electric
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0 0
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering $ 33`
Contingency0 33
1991-92 Estimated Casts $ 33
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance
1991-92 Assessment $ 33
Annexation No* 4- - CUP 253' (1 lot)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance $ 0
Water & Electric 0
'vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0 t
Incidental Expenses
Administration Engineering
Contingency 0 33
1991-92` Estimated Costs
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 4
1991-92 Assessment $ 33
Annexation No. _1 CRA 608 (1 lot)
19919; Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance
Water & Electric
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0 0
1 ,
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering 33
Contingency _ 0 33
1991-92 Estimated Costs< $ 3,
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance
1991-92 Assessment 3
Annexation No. 4-J - CUP, 519 (1 lot)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance $ 0
Water & Electric' - 0
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0 t
Incidental Expenses
Administration Engineering $ 33
Contingency - 0 3
1991-92 Estimated Cots $ 33
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance
1991-92 Assessment $ 33
Annexation No. 4-R - CUP 516 (1 lot)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance 0
Water & Electric - 0
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair = 0
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering = $ 33
Contingency 0 33
1391:-92 Estimated Costs 33
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance
1991-92 Assessment $ 33
Annexation No. 4-L - CUP SIS (i lot)
1.991-92 Fiscal Year
- 18 -
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance $ t
Water & Electric
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair - 0 0
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering
Contingency 0 33
1991-92 Estimated Costs $ 33
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance
1991-92 Assessment $ 33
Annexation .No. #-K - CUP 522 (1 lot)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance
Water & Electric 9
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0 0
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering = 33
Contingency 33
1991-92 Estimated Coasts $ 33
Estimated ,lune 30 Fend Balance
1991-92 Assessment $ 33
exat on No. -W' - CUP 521 (1 lot)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance $ C
Water & Electric
"vandalism & Sprinkler Repair W
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering $ 33
Contingency - 0 33
199192 Estimated Costs $ 33
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance
- 19
1991-92 Assessment
Annexation No. -0 - CRA 605 (3 lots)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance $ t
Water & Electric
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0 Q
Incidental. Expenses
Administration & Engineering $ 98
Contingency 98
199192= Estimated Casts $ 9
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance c
1991-92 Assessment $ 98
Annexation No. - - Parcel Map 12087 (3 lots)
1991_92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance = 0
Water & Electric 0
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair = 0 d
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering = $ 9
Contingency Q 98
1991-92 Estimated Costs 9
;Estimated. June 30 Fund Balance
1991-92 Assessment $ 98
Annexation No. 4-Q - parcel Map 11904 (2 lots)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance $
Water & Electric
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0
Incidental Expenses
-
Administration & Engineering 98
contingency 0 98
1991-92 Estimated Costs 98
Estimated June 30 .Fund Balance 0
1991-92 Assessment 98
Annexation No. 4-R - CUP 278
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance-
Contract Maintenance $ C
Nater & Electric _ 0
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair' 0 t
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering 98
contingency 0 98
1991-92 Estimated Costs $ 98
.Estimated June 30 Fund Balance
1991-92 Assessment $ 9
Annexation No. 4-S - CUP 405 (1lot)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance $ 0
Water & Electric
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering $ 33
Contingency = 0 33
1991-9 ' Estimated Casts 33
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance C
1991-92 ,Assessment $ 33
Annexation No. 4-T - CRA 3 bats
1991-92 Fiscal, Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance _ C
Water & Electric = d
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0 0
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering $ 65
Contingency _ 0 6
1991-92 Estimated Costs $ 65
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 0
1991-92 Assessment $ 65
Annexation No. 4-0 - CRA 346 (1 lot)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance - $ p
Water & Electric 0
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0 0
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering - $ 33
Contingency 0 3
1991-92 Estimated Costs $ 33
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 0
1.991-92 assessment $ 33
Annexation No. 4- CRA 607 (1 lot)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance $ 0
Water & Electric 0
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair - 0 0
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering - 3
Contingency - 0 3
1991-92 Estimated Cosh $ 3
Estimates) dune 30 Fund. Balance
1991-92 Assessment $ 33
-
Annexation No. 4-W - Tract 12461 (20 lots)
1991_32 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance $ 0
Water & Electric
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0 0
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering = 651
Contingency -- 61
1991-92= Estimated Cote 651
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance c
1991-92 Assessment 651
Annexation No. 4- - 'parcel Map 12022 (11- lots)
1991-92 al Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance 0
Water & Electric 0
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair - 0 0
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering =' 358
Contingency - 0 398
1991-92 Estimated Costs 358
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 0
1991-92 Assessment 358
Annexation No. S-A - XS 188 4 lots)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contrast Maintenance
Water & Electric 0
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair
Incidental Expenses
- 23
Administration & Engineering 131
Contingency 0 131
1991-92 Estimated Costs $ 131
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 0
1991-92 Assessment $ 1.31
_Annexation No. - 178 (5 lots)
1991-92 Fuca . Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance
Water & Electric = 0
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair w 0 0
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering = 165
Contingency B 165
1991-92 Estimated Costs $ 165
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance
1991-92 Assessment $ 16
Annexation No. - Tract 14556 (10 lots)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance _ 0
Water & Electric
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0 0
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering 333
Contingency 333
199192 Estimated Costs 333
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance
1991-92 Assessment $ 333
Annexation, No. 5-D CRA 611 (1 lot)
1991 °92 Fiscal. Year
Maintenance
-
Contract Maintenance $
Water & Electric
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0 0
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering 3
contingency" 0 33
1991-92 Estimated, Costs $ 3
Estimated ,lune 30 Fund Balance
1991-92 Assessment $ 33
Annexation No. 5-E - XS 196 (5 lots
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
ntenanc+
Contract Maintenance t
Water & Electric p
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair = 0 0
Incidental Expense
Administration & Engineering $ 165
Contingency 0 165
1991-92 Estimated Casts $ 165
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 0
1991-92 Assessment $ 165
Annexation No. _F M8 196 (2 lots)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance
Fater & Electric
Vandalism & ,Sprinkler Repair
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering 66
contingency - 0 66
1991-92 Estimated Costs $ 66
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance
1991-92 Assessment $ 6+
- 25
Annexation No. -tj - CRA 615 (1 lot)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance $ 0
Water & Electric 0
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair - 0 t
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering 3'
Contingency 0 33
1991-92 Estimated Casts $ 33
Estimated June 30 Fund Balance 0
1991-92 Assessment
Annexation No. 5 E - CRA 536 (1 lot)
1991-92 Fiscal Year
Maintenance
Contract Maintenance -- $ 0:
Water & Electric' p
Vandalism & Sprinkler Repair 0 0;
Incidental Expenses
Administration & Engineering = $ 3
Contingency 0 33
1991-9 sty ted Costs $ 33
Estimated June 30 Fund, Balance t
2991-92 Assessment $ 33
SECTION 6. Assessment Diagram
Copies of the assessment diagrams were attached to the Engineer's
-
Reports and were labeled "Exhibit All. For reference, please see
said reports for the assessment diagrams.
- 26 -
SECTION 7. Assessment
The city council, in forming Landscape Maintenance District No.
and in annexing territories to the district, has maintained the
philosophy that the subdivider or developer is responsible for the
plantings, irrigation system and the maintenance of the
improvements until they become well established. The assessments
for maintenance thus only include anticipated costs incurred
subsequent to the acceptance of the system by the City Council on,
behalf of the Maintenance District.
The maintenance of the landscaping is vital for the protection of
both economic and humanistic values of the development.. The city
Council has heretofore determined that for the preservation of
values incorporated within developments adjacent to landscaped
areas, the landscaped areas should be included in a maintenance
district to ensure satisfactory levels of maintenance. The
establishment of the assessment for each development must be on a
unit by unit basis which will preserve the integrity of each:
project. There should be a review of each annexation to determine
the effect upon the other units that have been developed. These
passible effects will have to be considered when determining the
annual:. assessments.
The determination of benefit for the lots within the district tastes
into consideration the following facts for the original district
and all annexations thereto,
original, District -rt Trantas 13282, 13434 and 134916
1., The purpose of landscaping is to provide an aesthetic
impression on the area.
2. The maintained landscaping benefits all properties in the
development.
3 The benefit to the lots not adjacent to the landscaped
areas benefit by the uniform maintenance andd appearance..
All lots not abutting the landscaped areas benefit
equally.
4 The landscaping on the Wabash Avenue and San Bernardino
Avenue boundaries of Tracts 13282 and 13434 respectively,
is oriented away from the units adjacent to the
landscaped areas, however these properties were given a.
1.0 percent surcharge to recognize proximity and support
benefit.
S. The landscaping in the common area along the Allesandro
Road frontage of Tract 13496 is oriented towards all the
units. Two of the bats abut the, landscaped areas and
were given a 20 percent surcharge to recognize proximity
and support benefit
6 The lots to receive surcharge shall be considered to be
within Assessment Zone "A".
Formula for Ikesessmant,
A = Assessment per interior lot
L = Number of Lots not adjacent; to landscaping areas on the
Wabash Avenue frontage of Tract 13282, the San Bernardino
Avenue frontage of Tract 13434 and the Allesandrb Road
frontage of 'bract 134961.
P = Number of lots with 10 percent or 20 percent surcharge
P [ {1.10} or (1.20) ] A = Amount to be assessed
The 1991-92 assessment will be spread based upon the preceding
formula.
Tract 13282
Total lot count in Tract 13282 is 38 lots, with 8 of these
lots being adjacent to Wabash Avenue.
Estimated 1991-92 Assessment
0A + 8 (1. 10A) 10,818
A = ` $ 27'8.81
Amount of assessment for bats not adjacent to the landscaping areas
on Wabash Avenin = $278..81.
Dunt of assessments for lots adjacent to Wabash Avenue with 10
percent surcharge = $306.70.
Tract 13434
Total lot count in Tract 13434 is 78 lots;, with 4 of these-
lots being adjacent to San Bernardino Avenue.
- 28 -
Estimated 1991-92 Assessment
(74A) + 4 (1.10A) = $ 10,077
A = $ 128.53
Amount of assessment for lots not adjacent to the landscaping areas
on San Bernardino Avenue = $123.53.
Dunt of assessments for lets adjacent to San Bernardino Avenue
with 10 percent surcharge = $141.39.
Tracie 1349
Total lot count in 'Tract 13496 is 9 lots, with 2 of these bats
being adjacent to Alle andro Road.
Estimated 1991- Assessment
(7A) + 2 (1.2A) - $19, 925
A = $2,119.68
Amount of assessment for lots not adjacent to the landscaping areas
on Allesandro Road = $2,119. 68.
Dunt of assessments for bats adjacent to Allesandro Road with 20
percent surcharge $2,543.62,
Annexation No. 1 Tract 13745
1. The purpose of landscaping is to provide an aesthetic
impression on the area.
2. The maintained landscaping benefits all properties in the
development.
3» The benefit to the lots not adjacent to the landscaped
areas ;benefit by the uniform maintenance and. appearance
All lots not abutting the landscaped areas benefit
equally.
... The landscaping on San Bernardino Avenue is oriented away
:from tate lots adjacent to the ,landscaped areas, however
these properties were given a 14 percent surcharge to
recognize proximity and: support benefit. These lots are
within Assessment Zone "All as shown on the Assessment
Diagram
- 29 -
Formula for Assessment
A = Assessment per interior lot
L = Number of lots not adjacent to landscaping areas; on San
Bernardino Avenue
P = Number of lots with 1.0 percent surcharge within Assessment
Zane '"A"
LA; + P 1. 101) A = Amount to be assessed
The 1991-92 assessment will be spread based upon the preceding for-
mula. 'Dotal lot count in the tract is 38 lots, with 9 of these
lots using adjacent to San Bernardino Avenue.<
Estimated 1991-92 Assessment
(`29A) + 9 (1.10A) - $ 17, 474
A = $449.20
Amount of assessment for lots not adjacent to the landscaping areas
on the San Bernardino Avenue = $449.203
Amount of assessments for lots within Assessment Zone "All adjacent
to the San Bernardino Avenue landscaping areas with 10 percent,
surcharge = $494. 12.
1991-92 Assessments
Tract Numbers 13745
Lots 16 through 24 = $494 .12 each
All remaining lots = $449.203 each
Annexation No. 1 - Tract 13765
1 The purpose of landscaping is to provide an aesthetic
impression on the area.
2. The maintained landscaping benefits all properties in the
development.
. The benefit to the lots not adjacent to the landscaped
areas benefit by the uniform maintenance and appearance.
All lots not abutting the landscaped areas benefit:
equally.
»
4The landscaping on San Bernardino Avenue is oriented away
from the lots adjacent to the landscaped areas, however
these properties were given a ltd percent surcharge to
recognize proximity and support benefit. 'these lots are
within Assessment Zone. "A as shown on the Assessment
Diagram.
Formula for Assessment
A Assessment per interior lot
Number of lots not adjacent to landscaping areas can San
Bernardino Avenue
P = Number of lots with 10 percent surcharge within Assessment
Zone "All
LA + P (1.10) A = Amount to be assessed
The 1991-92 assessment will be spread based upon the preceding for-
mula. Total lot count in the tract is 25 late, with 2 of these
lots being adjacent to San Bernardino Avenue.
Estimated 1991-92 Assessment
(23A) + 2 (1.10A) = $14,897
$591#1
Amount of assessment for lots not adjacent to the landscaping areas
on the San Bernardino Avenue - $591.15.
Dunt of assessments for lots within Assessment Zone "A" adjacent:
to the; San Bernardino Avenue landscaping areas with 10 percent
surcharge = $650.27.
1991-92 Assessments
Tract Numbers 1376$
Lots 2 through 24 = $591.15 each
All remaining lots = $650.27 each
Annexation n 'o. 2 Tract 1.3947
1. The purpose of landscaping is to provide an aesthetic
impression on the area.
- 31 -
2. The maintained landscaping benefits all properties in the
development
3. The benefit to the lots not adjacent to the landscaped
areas benefit by the uniform maintenance and appearance.
All lots not abutting the landscaped areas benefit
equally.
4 . The landscaping on Reservoir Road is oriented away from
the lots adjacent; to the landscaped areas, however these
properties were given a 10 percent surcharge to recognize
proximity and support- benefit. These acts are within
Assessment Zone "All as shown on the Assessment Diagram.
Formula for Assessment
A = Assessment per 'interior lot
L Number of bats not adjacent to landscaping areas can
Reservioi Road
P Number of lots with 10 percent surcharge within Assessment;
Zane "A
LA + .R (1. 10) A = Amount to be assessed
The cast of planting and installing improvements is to be paid by
the developer. For the benefit of the future owners the estimated
1991-92 assessment will be spread based upon the preceding formula.
Total lot count in the district is 35 lots, with 4 of these lots
being adjacent to Reservoir Road.
1991-92 Assessment
(31A) + 4 (1.10A) = $10,236
$; 8' .1.
Amount of assessment for lots not adjacent to the- landscaping areas
on the Reservoir Road. = $289.15.
Amount of assessments for lots within Assessment Zone "All adjacent
to the Reservoir Road landscaping areas with ltd percent surcharge
$318. 07.
i
1991-92 Assessments
Tract Number 13947
Lots 8, 26, 27 and 3 $318.07 each
All remaining lots = $289.15 each
Annexation No. 3 - Parcel Map 11917
Formula for Assessment
T Total length of perimeter landscaping = 3, 099'
Individual lot length of perimeter landscaping
A = Amount to be assessed = $28,943
The 1991-92 assessment will be spread based upon the preceding
formula. Total lot count in the district is 4 lots.
Estimated 1991-92 Assessment
Assessment per, lot::
Parcel 2 = 10101 / 3099' x $28,943 = $9,432.86
Parcel 3 2016' f 3099' x $28,943 = $1,923.93
.Parcel 4 324' 3099' x $28,943 3, 025,99
Parcel 5 = 1559' / 3099' x $28,943 = $14,560.22
Annexation No. 4 and 5
No assessments are proposed to be levied on the parcels in these
annexations except for the per lot general city overhead charges
and the prorated share of the annual engineer's report. This
assessment will be $33.00 per lot in each of these annexations.
The City Council will hold a public hearing' in June 1991 to
determine the assessments based, upon the costs for 1991-92 Fiscal
Year which are anticipated to be incurred by the City and which are
to be recovered through assessments as required by the Landscaping
and Lighting District Act of 1972.
- 33 --
SECTION 8. Order of Events
1. City Council adopts resolution of preliminary approval o
Engineer's Report.
2. City Council adopts resolution of intention specifying
the district boundary and sets a public hearing.
3. City Council conducts public= hearing, considers all
testimony and determines whether to conf irm the annual
assessments
Submitted By:
cz�-A;
Noel L. Christensen R.C.E. 15398
Engineer of Work
14
RR +
�� try �21,U;
f
vV
... 3