Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutContracts & Agreements_19-2024SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT TO PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This second amendment ("Second Amendment") to the agreement for Engineering services related to the California Street and Redlands Boulevard Intersection Widening Project dated November I, 2022 ("Agreement"), by and between the City of Redlands, a municipal corporation ("City"), and CASC Engineering and Consulting, Inc., a California corporation ("Consultant"), is made and entered into this 66h day of February 2024. RECITALS WHEREAS it is the desire of the City and Consultant to Article 2.1 of their existing Agreement, specifically described in Exhibit "A," "Scope of Services" to include an amended "Scope of Services," which is attached hereto by reference, and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City and Consultant to amend Article 4.1 of their existing Agreement, specifically described in Exhibit "B," "Project Schedule" to include an amended "Project Schedule," which is attached hereto by reference, and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City and Consultant to amend Article 4.2 of their existing Agreement to extend contract until December 31, 2024, and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City and consultant to amend Article 5.1 of their existing Agreement, specifically described in Exhibit "C," "Fee Schedule" to include an amended "Fee Schedule," which is attached hereto by reference, and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City and Consultant to amend Article 5.1 oftheir existing Agreement to increase Consultant's present total compensation of three hundred ninety-four thousand three hundred forty-five dollars ($394,345). NOW,TI-IEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration in the receipt of which is hereby acknowledge City and Consultant agree as follows: AGREEMENT Section 1, The scope of work performed by Consultant pursuant to Exhibit "A" of the Agreement, entitled "Scope of Services," is hereby amended and replaced by an amended Exhibit "A," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Attachment 1. Section 2, The project schedule set forth in Exhibit "B" of the Agreement, entitled "Project Schedule," is hereby amended and replaced by an amended Exhibit "B", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Attachment 2. Section 3. The fee schedule set forth in Exhibit "C" of the Agreement, entitled "Fee Schedule," is hereby amended and replaced by an amended Exhibit "C", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Attachment 3. I:\cmo\Agreements\CASC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Second Amendment FY23-OO20.docx-ins Section 4. Subsection 4.2 of Article 4 of the Agreement, titled "Performance of Services" is hereby amended to read as follows: "4.2 Consultant shall complete the Services by December 31, 2024, unless the Services are terminated earlier as provided for herein." Section 5. Subsection 5.1 of Article 5 of the Agreement, titled "Payments to Consultant," is hereby amended to read as follows: "5.1 Total compensation for Consultant's performance of the Services shall not exceed the amount of three hundred ninety-four thousand three hundred forty-five dollars ($394,345). City shall pay Consultant in accordance with Exhibit "C," titled "Fee Proposal," which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference." Section 6. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged by this Second Amendment and in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment, to be effective as of February 6, 2024. CITY OF '-I'9LANDS By: Eddie Tejeda, Mayor ATTEST: e Donaldson, City Clerk CASC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Richard err, President 2 I:\cmo\Agreements\CASC Engineering and Consulting, Inc Second Amendment FY23-0020 docx-ms ATTACHMENT 1 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES The consultant will develop plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) adhering to the requirements of the City of Redlands, the General Plan, the current Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Greenbook), Ca!trans Standard Specifications, and San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD) Standard Specifications. Please review the project carefully and submit your proposal in accordance with the instructions provided in the Request for Proposals (RFP). The as -built plans for the 2017 previously completed "California Street/Redlands Intersection Improvement Project" has been attached to be used as an example only. The scope of work that follows is intended as a guide only. The proposer is advised to add any critical tasks or elements which may have been overlooked, or delete any extraneous tasks deemed not necessary to the success of the project: A. Project Coordination: Consultant shall include Project Management as one of the work tasks, The Consultant shall act as a manager of the Consultant's team, including any Subconsultants. The Consultant shall manage and coordinate all components ofthe Project and take a proactive role in keeping all tasks on schedule and on budget and ensure timely completion of the project. Consultant shall give prior notice to the City, and obtain acceptance from same, before performing work outside the contract work scope and thereby contract budget amount, a. Hold a design kick-off meeting with City representatives to review the project in detail, design requirements, schedule, potential concerns and cost limitations. b. Maintain continuous communication with the City, including meetings to review the preliminary plan and project status at 60%, and 90% completion. e. Provide agendas for each project status meeting including items for discussion and meeting minutes listing action items. d. Provide an updated project schedule at each progress meeting. e. Maintain continuous awareness of the status of each task as it proceeds and make provisions to expedite and resolve any difficulties within the critical path. f. Provide a presentation to City Council and additional committees as requested by City staff. B. Agency and Utility Coordination: a. Coordinate with utility companies within the project limits as necessary. b. Prepare an initial request for utility information such as atlas sheets, mapping, or as - built plans, and notify of the need to install planned facilities around the project. c, Coordinate with utility companies to upgrade facilities, as needed. d. Review utility information to determine the impact ofthe project on the various utilities, including contacting each affected utility company to determine facilities that may interfere with proposed construction. e. Maintain a utility matrix documenting contacts, issues, etc. with utility companies. f. Deliverables: - Digital submission of utility matrix. 3 I:\emo\AgrcemenIs\CASC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Second Amendment FY23-0020.docx-ms C. Preliminary Engineering: a. Design Survey i. Perform research for survey information. ii. Perform survey and conduct data collection. iii. Obtain topographic feature locations for a complete and accurate representation of existing conditions within the public right-of-way. iv. Obtain complete record drawings and other documents to show location of all utilities, location and dimensions of all sidewalks and driveways, location of all trees and landscaping which may be affected by the improvements; and v. The survey and datum will be tied into the state plane coordinate system and City benchmark. vi. Review and analyze existing conditions. b. Additional Design Survey i. CASC will provide a design survey of the area outlined in red on Figure l located below. This will include establishment of horizontal and vertical survey control for the complete length of the project. The basis of bearings will be referenced to the California Coordinate System of 1983, and the elevations will be referenced to the nearest City or County Benchmarks. CASC will provide spot elevations at a minimum of a 50' x 50' grid and locate all existing physical features. Physical features shall include but are not limited to curbs, flow -lines, centerlines, grade breaks, low points, angle points, spandrels, pavement striping, surface utilities, structures, walls, trees, poles, catch basins, signs, manhole lids, and irrigation boxes. CASC will extend the design survey previously performed and obtain invert information as requested on figure 2 below. Survey data will be compiled into a CAD base map with a 3D surface and one -foot contours generated. CAD base map provided by CASC will be in model space, will not include an exhibit with sheets and points scaled to size. Figure 1 4 I:\cmo\Agreements\CASC Engineering and Consulting, lnc Second Amendment FY23-0020 docx-ms Figure 2 c. Field Review i. Research and review base data documents including as -built improvement plans, utility information and other available record data; and ii. Conduct a design review field meeting with City staff at 60% design completion to evaluate design recommendations against existing conditions. iii. Field Review Deliverables: - Minutes of design review field meeting. The Consultant shall take the leadership role in all steps required for the approval of the Environmental Documents, include spearheading timely approvals from Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, SBCFCD, California State Water Resources Control Board, etc. Consultant will be the sole entity to perform research, surveys, studies, graphics, and coordination with the appropriate entitles and agencies, and shall not expect or rely on City staff to perform this work or to supplement the Consultant's work. d. The consultant shall determine whether environmental work anticipated with this project is required or whether CEQA Categorical Exemption Section 15301 (c) applies to this project. e. Environmental surveys, technical studies, public meetings. Consultant to prepare considering the Project needs. f. Environmental Documents: Prepare and process the appropriate environmental documents for approval by the City and appropriate entities respectively. Environmental mitigation. plans and agreements. g. Consultant prepares with applicable resource agencies and process approvals of the plans through regulatory agencies. h. TRANSPORTATION PROJECT BMP DOCUMENT (TPBD) - If it is determined that Transportation Project BMP Document is required, the Consultant will prepare the TPBD in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Guidance. The TPBD will generally follow the template structure included in the Guidance. The Template includes constraints analysis that may produce the conclusion that none of the listed BMPs in the Guidance are feasible. If a BMP is feasible, the Consultant will incorporate them into the design to meet the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) 5 !:\cmo\Agreements\CASC Engineering and Consulting, Inc Second Amendment FY23-0020 docx-ms standard based on the site -specific constraints for the project: The proposed project is in an area that is required to address Hydrologic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) as defined in the Guidance. The HCOC analysis and the design of appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to address HCOC will be part of the TPBD if necessary. At least three submittals will be required regardless of BMP feasibility. Consultant will provide an electronic copy of the TPBD for submittal with project plans. Consultant will then revise the TPBD to incorporate comments within the scope of services and provide revised electronic copies for each subsequent submittal for review and acceptance. REVISION TO JURSIDICTIONAL DELINEATION As the Project footprint has expanded to include the area south of Redlands Boulevard within Mission Zanja Creek, the jurisdictional limits of this reach of the creek will need to be delineated. To identify potential jurisdictional features, a three -parameter delineation will be conducted according to the Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Arid West Region and the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual. The biologists will delineate the jurisdictional limits of non - wetland waters of the United States following the procedures set forth in 33 Code of Federal Regulations 328.3(e). CASC anticipates that a routine delineation (as defined by the United States Army Corps of Engineers [USACED, which is tailored to the site characteristics, will be adequate. The delineation will consider any additional information needs based on the State's Wetland Definition and Procedures for Discharges of Dredged or Fill Material to Waters of the State as administered by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Further, the extent of any streambed and associated riparian areas subject -to review by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) under Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code will be determined. One site visit will be performed to obtain data and record on -site conditions. Results of the draftjurisdictional delineation will require verification and approval by the USACE, the RWQCB, and the CDFW. i. Deliverable: Consultant previously provided the City with a Jurisdictional Delineation Report (dated August 2023) for the reach of the Creek that is north of Redlands Boulevard. Consultant will amend the August 2023 report to include the results of these field studies, update all geospatial data, and figures in an amended Jurisdictional Delineation Report. The report will be suitable for submittal to the involved agencies for purposes of jurisdictional delineation approval, permit applications, and for inclusion as a technical appendix. The report will identify and quantify jurisdictional areas and features, including a breakdown of wetlands and non -wetland waters of the United States, waters of the State, and CDFW jurisdictional areas. The report will also identify features as earthen or concrete. An estimate of permanent and temporary impacts (as well as earthen versus concrete) resulting from the discharge of fill material into jurisdictional areas will not be included in this delineation report but will be provided upon request. Upon receipt of comments from the resource agencies, Consultant will revise the draft report and submit a final report. This task includes responses to one round of consolidated comments. Should project plans and/or the project description change after the impact analysis has been 6 I: \emo\ Agreements\CASC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. Second Amendment FY23-0020.docx-ms J. conducted, and/or if additional rounds of comments and/or additional coordination is required, a budget augment will be necessary to complete the additional work. Additional Biological permitting services - Consultant will prepare permit applications accordingly. Changes to Project design during or after preparation of the package may necessitate a budget augment. Each application packet will be reviewed with the Project team prior to submittal to the respective agencies. Any additional coordination and requests by agencies for additional information not available to Consultant prior to submittal may necessitate a budget augment. Consultant anticipates up to three correspondence efforts with the agencies for this scope of work. Consultant assumes the Project will only require a nationwide permit and not an individual permit (which would require more environmental and an alternatives analysis). k. Consultant will update the Initial Study according to the revisions to the Project. This includes updating the Project Description, text, tables, and exhibits. If' additional revisions are requested outside of this service, they will be provided under separate authorization. I. Based on the proposed revisions to the Project, Consultant will update applicable technical studies (Geotechnical, Cultural, Paleontological, Air Quality, GI-IG, Construction Noise, and Biological) accordingly. This includes updates to the Project Description, text, tables, and exhibits. Lithe proposed changes require updates to the analyses, services will be provided under separate authorization. D. Final Engineering: Plans, specifications, and estimates shall be provided at levels of completion of approximately 60%, 90%, and 100% (Mylar). The City will provide review comments at the concept, 60% and 90% design stage. It is expected that 100% plans will be complete. Plans shall conform to the requirements of the City of Redlands, the General Plan, the current Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Greenbook), Caltrans Standard Specifications, and County of San Bernardino Flood Control District (SBCFCD) Standard Specifications. and shall be prepared utilizing AutoCAD software. All work identified herein shall be approved by a Professional Engineer registered within the State of California. Project plans shall include, but are not limited, to the following: i. Title and construction detail sheets; ii. Civil design plans. Plans shall include removals, existing and proposed improvements, utility base mapping, etc. Where necessary, the plans shall define limits of repairs to pavement, curb, gutter, sidewalk, ADA upgrades, etc. The plans shall be at a horizontal scale of 1 "=20' or 1"=40' where appropriate; iii. Signing and striping plans at a horizontal scale of 1 "=40'. Signing and striping plans shall be prepared and meet criteria established in the MUTCD, latest 7 I:\cmo\Agreements\CASC Engineering and Consulting, inc. Second Amendment FY23-0020.docx-ms edition; iv. Submit 60% and 90% completion plans for City's review and comments. Revise plans based on City comments; and v. Submit 100% plans (mylars) and project specifications. vi. Revisions to Final Engineering — Update drawings to extend the proposed triple RCP upstream to meet the existing triple RCB under California Street. These revisions will include the following: Removal of approximately 92 linear feet of existing 7.6'Hx25' W RCB. Removal of the existing upstream pcc transition structure. Install approximately 145 additional linear feet of new 11'Hxl8'W triple RCB with connection to existing triple RCB. Provide existing storm drain lateral connections to new triple RCB. In performing said service, the consultant shall use, whenever possible, the boilerplate specifications prepared and approved by the City. All drawings and specifications shall be adequate and sufficient for the City to solicit bids for the award of the construction contract for said work. i. Deliverables: - Two sets of full size plan submittals at 60% and 90% completion milestones; - One full size Mylar set of 100% drawings; and - DVD containing bid package in PDF, AutoCAD and Microsoft Word. E. Cost Estimates: Prepare quantity calculations and final construction cost estimates in accordance with City requirements to meet established project budget. i. Deliverables: - Cost estimate at Concept, 60%, 90% and 100% design; and - Electronic files of 100% cost estimates. F. ,Specifications: Prepare Technical Specifications to be used in conjunction with the City boilerplate specifications. Preparation of all required Federal/State documents to be included in the specifications. i. Deliverables: - Specifications at the 60%, 90% and 100% completion milestones; and - Electronic files of 100% specifications. G. Prc]jcct Advertisement. Services: Consultant shall provide support during bidding. Work includes, but is not limited to, the following: i. Respond to Requests for Information (RFls) during the project advertisement period, and log questions and responses. All communication shall be directed to the City for issuance to the bidders, at no time shall the consultant respond directly to bidders; and ii. Prepare addenda as necessary with coordination and issuance by the City. 8 1:\cino\Agreements \CASC Engineering and Consulting, Inc, Second Amendment FY23-0020 docx-ms Hi. Deliverables: - Tabulated Response to RFIs & Addendums, as necessary. H. Construction, Support Services: Consultant shall provide support during construction. Work includes, but is not limited to, the following: i. Provide response to contractor's requests for information (RFI) regarding the project forwarded to the consultant by the City. This task includes conferring with the City's Construction Manager regarding the RFI, as appropriate. All • communication shall be directed to the City for issuance to the Contractor, at no time shall the Consultant respond directly to Contractor; ii. Review and approve shop drawings; and Regularly scheduled construction observation is specifically excluded from this scope of work. I. Prepare Record Drawings (As -built): Within sixty days following the completion and acceptance of the project, furnish City with a complete set of revised original tracings showing as -built conditions. Revisions will be solely based on as -built information provided by the City's Construction Manager and the Contractor. Consultant assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information provided by the City's Construction Manager and the Contractor. i. Deliverables a. Furnish a complete set of revised original record drawings. b. Revise record drawings based on the revised design scope. These revisions will be limited to the sewer main re -alignment at the intersection of California Street and Redlands Blvd. 9 I:\cmo\Agreements\CASC Engineering and Consulting, (ne Second Amendment FY23-0020.docx-ms ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT "B" Project Schedule D IQ Tack Mode Task Name F7urauon Start Finish 1 it "Re -start" Kickoff Meeting 1 day Mon 11/27/23 Mon 11/27/23 2 or, Additional Design Survey 10 days Tue 11/28/23 Mon 12/11/23 3 Er, PTR 4 days Tue 11/28/23 Fri 12/1/23 4 1r. Additional Research and Base Mapping 4 days Tue 12/12/23 Fri 12/15/23 5 TTi. owl Project Initiation/Description 10 days Tue 1/23/24 Mon 2/5/24 6 o. City Review Project Description 5 days Tue 2/6/24 Mon 2/12/24 7 g Technical Studies 24 days Mon 10/3/22 Thu 11/3/22 8 r., Biological Evaluation 24 days Mon 10/3/22 Thu 11/3/22 9 I or. Draft IS/MND 106 days Mon 10/3/22 Thu 3/9/23 10 r Prepare Admin. IS/MND 10 days Mon 10/3/22 Fri 10/14/22 11 or, City Review 15 days Mon 10/17/22 Fri 11/4/22 12 Il.. Prepare Draft IS/MND 5 days Mon 11/7/22 Fri 11/11/22 13 r, City Review 10 days Mon 11/14/22 Tue 11/29/22 14 WI Circulate Draft IS/MND 30 days Mon 11/7/22 Tue 12/20/22 15 or, IS/MNDResponse to Comments 5 days Wed 12/21/22 Wed 1/4/23 16 n City Review Response to IS/MND comments 10 days Thu 1/5/23 Wed 1/18/23 17 Planning Commission 10 days Thu 1/19/23 Wed 2/1/23 18 on City Council 26 days Thu 2/2/23 Thu 3/9/23 19 ®; Final Engineering 160 days Mon 12/18/23 Fri 7/26/24 20 �� Revised 60% Submittal 71 days Mon 12/18/23 Mon 3/25/24 21 ii ar. Street Improvement Plan 21 days Mon 12/18/23 Mon 1/15/24 22 i. Channel Improvement Plan 25 days Tue 1/2/24 Mon 2/5/24 23 w4 Water Improvement Plan 3 days Tue 2/6/24 Thu 2/8/24 2•1 o. Traffic Signal Modification 10 days Tue 2/6/24 Mon 2/19/24 25 s, Utility Relocation Coordination 7 days Tue 2/6/24 Wed 2/14/24 76 on ROW Mapping 4 days Tue 2/6/24 Fri 2/9/24 27 i'A en Specs and Estimates 5 days Tue 2/20/24 Mon 2/26/24 28 In 1st submittal City 20 days Tue 2/27/24 Mon 3/25/24 29 74 a"+ 1st submittal Flood Control 20 days Tue 2/27/24 Mon 3/25/24 30 ! 90% Submittal 56 days Mon 4/1/24 Mon 6/17/24 31 or. Street Improvement Plan 12 days Mon 4/1/24 Tue 4/16/24 32 a+ Channel Improvement Plan 13 days Wed 4/17/24 Fri 5/3/24 33 n Water Improvement Plan 6 days Mon 5/6/24 Mon 5/13/24 34 P, Traffic Signal Modification 5 days Wed 4/17/24 Tue 4/23/24 35 I, Utility Relocation Coordination 7 days Tue 5/14/24 Wed 5/22/24 36 ine4 ROW Mapping 2 days Tue 5/14/24 Wed 5/15/24 37 n Specs and Estimates 5 days Tue 5/14/24 Mon 5/20/24 38 in 2nd submittal City 20 days Tue 5/21/24 Mon 6/17/24 39 In 2nd submittal Flood Control 20 days Tue 5/21/24 Mon 6/17/24 40 ,r1 100% Submittal 29 days Tue 6/18/24 Fri 7/26/24 41 In Street Improvement Plan 5 days Tue 6/18/24 Mon 6/24/24 4? or, Channel Improvement Plan 5 days Tue 6/18/24 Mon 6/24/24 43 in Water Improvement Plan 5 days Tue 6/18/24 Mon 6/24/24 44 !', Traffic Signal Modification 5 days Tue 6/18/24 Mon 6/24/24 45 in Utility Relocation Coordination 7 days Tue 6/25/24 Wed 7/3/24 46 ®; ROW Mapping 2 days Tue 6/25/24 Wed 6/26/24 47 uri Specs and Estimates 5 days Tue 6/25/24 Mon 7/1/24 48 n 3rd submittal City 15 days Tue 7/2/24 Mon 7/22/24 49 or. 3rd submittal Flood Control 15 days Tue 7/2/24 Mon 7/22/24 50 W. Bid Phase 30 days Mon 7/22/24 Fri 8/30/24 S1 JFi an RFI's 30 days Mon 7/22/24 Fri 8/30/24 ATTACHMENT 3 EXHIBIT 1"C'1 Fee Schedule TASK DESCRIPTION TOTAL Nam Mt Pw TOTAL Additional Cott Otand Total A. ProInt Monoprm0'nl . r,4,9 hlrr .ng Katull Mlrlrrla'fS 11 51a nU Yl'. 0; 5 10 0/1 CK1 510 Mr 11 1.14011r] 7 910110 11000 1..3:0 ,0C 8r.11131 TO 10 G1 15 12;2 CC f/0) 011 Subtotal d AGtML7 AND U)IIIIYCOOROINAIION 49 1,130.00 8,397.00 4,300.00 11,197 00 111r111) and Rt 130,11 Nesel'rh Mapping ana Coor,llnar,nn 84 1`915104 12.1111. 011 Subtotal { ➢R[tIM1NARY Miet/31e9MG 64 105.00 12 915.00 12,915.00 I5 / 14400 '.54000 IS[U 00 Pr Xi4r)rr.uy T113 Anlvvl Av,1r,3 1.1 1 1:0 iC 11100n . x, . u,t 1, un.) N.t:, Mrp: - .4 16 1.310 CC 2 640 00 I rr ll 71.r.'-31,0n .,-0:111'of ROW 71 1. 7'?': n: 7 /95 00 f1•r1,t1'3 ,3,31,.I.15t..4.31 10 1,430 00 3 0/4 00 10/400 Sublulot 99 1,48000 19,763.00 7.400.00 77,261.0/1 MI TM T[CYNICAL SSW/CIS 7,,,1 1 host 621r,t 03,0e.'•:r0 1015CC 1,015 MI T,nk 2 Au131,7 r1 PrnO•unl frdmlul Studies 0 .-.. •r,l....., .,I ,..r „.:,11.,:r r: r:i,l 1 21. IPA 511 11651 N: Ilv:1!on S0e"_I •i11 0 1:,151 ;11 12.557.'0 I1',311101 15,561511 a r 1r..,, .::: r•1(�'. r�::.,:r .1: ,:: ,r:t1i•:I �:,'. 11 1,42a120 ii 0 ,_..1.:,-, Ni r_'+.10i,: I00'ol;N4 5.1:,113I 0• ..''I-.. r. 1.1' l,,rr1 5': 1 !101)C 11•CO 0:1 Io.810 ro 7'I/ i',.,•,',. 1,, r11:,,..1.1, .: I.S51) 5,33 SI :1.1681CC 1.:131 MI 11.13100 Pr ru„a 11r311 ,S' :!:•1[). 3..''10l,i),•l p 16 L,. 1:1 01 (.11200 P.r{r„r 7:'I,1•c tit r1115il.,taa .., 1.11/1, P.14181, 23. 1.394 C: 1 694 110 7'.1L 1 l r.p4'. ➢-, r,,,,..,1„ (. ren,. , 1, 1 ;40 r_0 ^l0 10 7•,I 3 Me., 4Irli C,n,•I'.'.,I,,r:. 71) 50 '2 (C 10/70) r , r.9-:•,, r, �..1- h.,: 1 >so: 1011-)CC 115 (KO) 00 27,00700 71.000011 19.0W00 1.'I000 00 Sobrolul 714 54,164.00 65,92000 69,50000 155,420.00 1. ft9A1INGIN01411 1157.L t16 V.17000 4.1,11it/ 11.14000 I ,.b,11n,16v ',Irwin,. Plur, / 110 MI 1,.4100[1 Ill: 1 I, ICO40 1Mtr10 C! 11.11'.l')/ 41,98',00 1 er lnlpinl•e 3110111 ul_n,l,-nu,1111,,i3o,,; 1 /i,100 2.211101 ,,/.03 1,3,.„+1331 01.I0 1r, r i. ['XIr;,1 1,. 1'7J O:1 I, , _. r 1-r•.r !'1 0 n2000 11101t1 a07,11111 1194000 r, ,,.1, 6 2/4410) I,S:i1C.: 4:i00 1850/AI •." ','-,•. 12 1250,1 1,115. it, 110 CO 7.i..i101 NW, II.,I Due.:. ,-re I• 1 "' •^ •" I • 1! 6, 36.0.00 1 11,213/ 11'?)') OIS 55.tr02, 4,1;000 4 69000 7.450131 14 175 LW 10 095 00 24.7200n ...�, r._ r. ,. ._.,. ... _... 1 930 00 1. 930n0 ...' .1.,L.,....• , 71 3 19500 708500 5 /:31011 ❑ic.: Sr,eO ...__.,. n,;,., 0 55000 55000 1./It. 00 1,78-,011 5 16500 'I;., 1:0 0,,21 1 S1,110 •- r .r 17 16100 2,7100C an';:R,1 1 25S IA! 100•, Suln,'11.41,3 n, ,'1, It. 2.11000 22•,.'3/ i.e.:-. co ..r. - r. 1./Ili 0u / 140/OO _. ..•. •.• r., ..•. I, lsr1.00 ..11•... 611011 11L,10I ,u n., ,u:., , -m ,. II .1. 11 11 ,,.,,.. 'Ir„tat 4u•, , 1 285CC 12...11 1.7101111 0 17000 1101Y1 22020 1.1400,1 117 .41 1./ 50 ;'u1 41 L.157 50 r.. I: 117•u1 2 011 5C 4/500 2 50/ 50 Subtotal 451 76.910.00 91,725.0e 11,145. CO 167,870. no Oia➢Aare Suppartl[Au I1301L5 17E000 11E1,011 )0:70110 Il 010011 42011111 /41:00 870,n] 4171 A1,1, I1r,31.In SIrullur41 0 a500O ,5'.)00 650(31 1012106e1 IS 1,540.00 2,300,00 4440 4.240,00 , (on1L>4H6!n ➢hate Sapp..? CAS(u0d f/S 717500 !_17, INl 4,15000 115 C.: 1. 115 00 1, 210 00 ,1, 74', 1/00,1 10 I.',))) 1111 01; Ill 41r m ,. a„ Ilrr,n,:l 5;r3. 13, al ;taco Ni001 Subtotal Rttad 0rc.v,a01 10 1,770 00 5,970.00 6,170.00 17,290,00 •.•3 11250C 4:0-0/ 1.2200,1 • 11 47500 4 /5 00 1110500 1 540 110 lo<e•1411n,n 51'.,,..,'.1 0 840 MI 84000 P40C,1 Subtotal 9 1,115.00 1,740.00 1,210.00 4,150,00 R, captain 11 11100 00 Sublulnl 1-07A1 944 2.060.00 7,000.00 940714 ( S711,93000 J16711640 _ 2,000.00 S348,61.00