HomeMy WebLinkAbout6998_CCv0001.pdf RESOLUTION NO. 6998'
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
REDLANDS ADOPTING THE FIVE-SEAR CAPITAL PROJECT
NEEDS ANALYSIS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2011/2012 THROUGH
2015/201
WHEREAS; the Sin Bernardino County voters approved passage of Measure "I"
in November 2004 authorizing lie San Bernardino ardino Ass ciated Governments, acting
the San Berardino County Transportation Authority (the "Authority"'), to impose a one-
half of one percent retail transactions and use tax applicable (the "Tax") to the
incorporated and unincorporated territory of the County of San Bernardino; and
WHEREAS, revenue from the Tax can only be used for transportation
improvement and traffic management programs authorized in the Expenditure Plans set
forth in Ordinance No. 04-1 of the Authority;and
WHEREAS, the Authority's Strategic Plan requires; each localjurisdiction
applying for revenue from.the Valley Major Street and Freeway Interchange Programs to
annually adopt and update a Five-Year Capital Project Needs Analysis
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Redlands hereby adopts the Measure "I" Five-Year Capital Project Needs Analysis for
Fiscal Years 2011/2012 through 2015/2016, cope of which is attached to this resolution
as Exhibit"A."
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 2l''`day of September,2010.;
Pat Gilbreath, Mayor
ATTEST:
,17
11
1t
Sr Irwin,City C erg
1
I, Sam Irwin, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 6998 was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof
held on the 2 1 day of September, 20 10 by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Bean, Harrison, Gallagher, Aguilar; Mayor Gilbreath
NO None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
City Clerk, City of Redlands J
2
Exhibit"A"
Capital Project Needs Analysis v SANBAG
CITY OF REDLANDS
Valley Arterial Sub-Program
FY 201111.2 through 2015/16
Project 1 Traffic Signal at 6"Street and I-10 EB
Project Traffic Signal at 6`h,Street and 1-10 STB
Project 3 Traffic Signal at Ford Street and 1-10 WB
Project 4 Widen Orange Street farm.Delaware Ave.to Pennsylvania Ave.
Project 5 Widen O Street from Pennsylvania Ave,to San Bernardino Ave.
Capital Project Needs Analysis
City of Redlands
Valley Arterial Sub-Program
(2010 dollars, in $1'000s SANBAG will apply escalation factors, by year)
Pro act Information Phase Fundinv PRIOR FY 11!12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 EY'um FY 1a/1£,
Traffic Signal at 6th and 1-10 PA&ED
EB Ramp, Total 'Cost: $0.00
Fund Type:
Other:
r:
Total Project Cost: PS&1=
$225 Total 'Cost:, $10.00
Fund Type: DEV FEE 10
Total Measure I Request:
$173
(heed to add cells with Ml ) Other:
ROW
Total Cost: $215;00
Fund Type: DEV FEE 42
Comments: MI MAJ ST 173
Design Plans Complete.
Caltrans Review substantially Other;
complete, new construction CONST
permit required, Caltrans Total Cost. $225:00
Maintenance Agreement fund Type:
executed:
Other-
"Prior includes any FY 2010-2011 all=fjon
Exhibit"
AI AG GP IA FY 11-'12 to 15-16 vl,xIs-C,PNA Art Project 1: Page 1 of
Capital Project Needs Analysis
City of Redlands
Valley Arterial Sub-Program
(2010 dollars, i $1'000s-SANBAO will apply escalation factors, by year)
Project Information n Phase Funding PRIOR FY 11112 FY 12113 FY 13/14 FY 14115 FY 16116
Traffic Signal at 6th and 1-10 PA&ED
WB Ramp Total Cast; $0.00
Fund Type.
Other:
Total Project Cost. PS&E
$226 Total Cost: $10.00
Fend Type: DEV FEE 10
Total Measure I Request:
$173
(need to add cells with l$) Other:
ROW
Total Cast:: $216.00
Fund Type:` CTEV FEE 42
Comments Ml MAJ ST 173
3
Design Plans Complete.
Caltrans Review substantially tither:
complete, new construction CONST
permit required, Caltrans Total Cast. $226.00
Maintenance Agreement Fund Type: ,
executed:
Other:
*Friar includes any FY 2010-2014 allocation
Exhibit"A'
1:\City Council Reports and Agenda P'lansQ01 f1 Staff Repperts%9-21\SANBAG CPNA\SANBAG CPNA FY 11-12 to 15,16 vl.xis Page 2 of
Capital Project Needs Analysis
City of Redlands
Valle Arterial Sub-Program
(2010 dollars, In $1'000s -SANBAG will apply escalation factors, by year)
Pro+ect Information Phase Funding PRIOR FY 11112 FY12113 FY 13114 FY 14 16 FY16i16
raffia Signal at Ford Street RAU
and 1-10 W13 Ramp Total Cost. $0.00
Fund Type;
Other:_
Total Project Cost: PS&f:
$230 Total Cast: $10.00
Fund Type. DEV FEE ftp
Total Measure I Request::
$177
(need to add cells with Mail$) Other:
ROW
Total Cost: $220.00
,Fund Type: CTEV FEE 43
Comments X11 M .1 ST 177
Design Plans Compete,
wtdevelcper. Caltrans Review Other.,
substantially complete, new CONS
construction permit required. Total Gast. $230.00
Fund Type:
Othec
.Prior includes any FY 2010-2011 alioration
Exhibit"N'
lA ity Council Reports and Agenda Plans12010 Staff Reportslg-21t ANBA GPNA1 ANA PNA FY 11-12 to 15-15 vl,xis Page 3 of 5
City of Redlands
Valley Arterial Sub-Program
( 010 dollars, In $'1'000x-SANBAG will apply escalation factors, by year)
Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR FY 111'12 FY 12/13 FY'13114 FY 14116 x''''151'16
Widen E.S {ganga Street PA& p
from Delaware Ave. to Total Cost: $0.00
Pennsylvannia AveJ Fund Type.
Pennsylvania Ave (Seg. 1)
Other:
Total Project Cost, PS&E
$266 Total Cast: $30.00
Fund Type. DELI PEE 3
Total Measure I Request:
$204
(need to add cells with M1 ) Other:
ROVE
Total Cast: $0.00
Fund Type: DEV FEE
Comments: MI MAGI ST
Appr irnat ly 15 facet Street
Widening Cather
Ct`NST
Taal Cost, $235.00
Fund Type: CTEV FEE 31
MI MAGI ST 204
Other.
*Prior In l d any-PY 2610-2011 ;5c tion
Exhibit"N'
JACO Connell Reports and Agenda Planst2010 Staff Repertsl -211SANBA CPNA\SANBAC CPNA FY 11-12 to 15-15 v1 xis Page 4 of 5
Capital Project Needs Analysis
City of Redlands
Valley Arterial Sub-Program
(2010 dollars, In $11000s-SANBAG villf apply escalation factors, by year)
!Project Information Phase Funding PRIOR FY 11M2 FY 12f13 FY 13114 FY 14/15 FY 15/16
'Widen E.S Orange Street PX&ED
from Pannsylvannia Ave. to Total Cost: $0.()0
south of San Bernardino Fund Type:
Ave. (Seg. 2)
Other:
Total Project Cost: PS&E
$275 Total Cost: $30.00
Fund Type: DEV FEE 30
Total Measure I Request
$211
(need to add cells with Ml$) Other:
ROW
Total Cost: $0.00
Fund Type'. DEV FEE
Comments: MI MAJ ST
Approximately 30+/-foot Street
Widening Other.,
CONST
Total Cost $246.00
Fund Type* DEV FEE 34
MI MAJ ST 211
Other:
*Prior includes any FY 2010-2011 allocation
Exhibit"A"
I,NCity Council Reports and Agenda Plans12010 Staff Reports\9-211SANBAG CIDWSANSAG CPNA FY 11-12 to 15-16 vi.xIs Page 5 of 5
a. A k � « «.:: 1 :S «« i •1 1,.1 / i A « w /: « 1« « :.1'1« :....i -1«
Governments
Working Together SPORTATION
EASUREI
It ;It
;61110.1211
f t #I.M415 1 «
#' is • . '..•..4.i « . 1 �« ri ! •#. •# - • t.. .. .«• t ,. ... ..# ...
All
+..ft #f. .:. t ' « e '• t ".# • •-i - - '..t , • #.".- t't t:' # fes. . .• .1.. ,.#�. .
-f - t_ ! ! _ r. - Ott • # ff • + r
rpt • -#. t~ t s f i • . 1. � #- • tt « .# t 4 i
• # t - 1t ®•t • «ts tt 1 • t tom . . �• # •f • • • � 1 t- •f •� .* t
e �.r- r.....1 w"r. r a '.'.• r:. a « �I' r.. Ir r. 1 1 .1 .. a r.. s a r a. r s r. •..
,.�.., � ,.P r r. s 1 •s: '.-r 1 a �.e.. r s C.. a. � 'r x er �. - :..1.
August 10,2010
Page 2
• include any projects that were listed in your FY 2010-2011 Jurisdiction Master
Agreement for which you may have expenditures in FY 2011-2012 or beyond. The
Master Agreements will be revised after the FY 2011-201211 I allocation to reflect
expenditures anticipated by the new CPNA.
• Propose only those projects/phases that can be realistically funded and accomplished
within the firrieffiame you define. This,is not a project"'wish lisf' for Measure I funding,
but the definition of a realistic schedule for when you can actually use Measure I dollars.
• Consider the availability of dollars you have to meet the required minimum match. Both.
the Valley Freeway Interchange Program and the Valley Major Street Program have
development fair share matching requirements. SANBAG cannot allocate funds without
a commitment by the jurisdiction to the match. The development share can also be
funded with internal loans, as described in Policies 40005 FI-24, 40006/VMS-19 and
4000 -S3. If the development share is being funded with an internal loan, this
should be designated on the CPNA.
Included below is additional information on-the Valley Freeway Interchange and Major Street
Programs that should be considered while preparing your jurisdiction7s,CPNA.
Vatky Freeway Interchange Program
`Ihe Valley Freeway Interchange Program contains 3 8 projects and is fimded by I I%of the total
Measure I revenue in the Valley subarea. The cash-flow analysis for FY 2010-2011 indicated
that no additional funding is expected to be available for Valley Freeway Interchange Program
projects until at least FY 2014/2015. Funding for the first several years has been consumed by
commitments to Project Advancement Agreements and the I-10 interchanges at Cherry, Citrus,
and Tippecanoe. However,jurisdictions should include in their CPNA a realistic assessment of
expenditures they may incur on interchange projects assuming that no Measure I funds are
available over the 5-year CPNA period. This would provide useful information regarding how
jurisdictions might proceed if an Advance Expenditure Agreement were to be executed between
SANBAG and the jurisdiction (see Strategic Plan Policy 40002). A policy on criteria for
executing Advance Expenditure Agreements is still under development, and depending on the
outcome, SANBAG may enter into an AEA with jurisdictions willing to front the funds required
for early project development and delivery. A draft apportionment/allocation recommendation
for interchanges will be formulated by staff in December 2010 or January 2011 providing an
opportunity for localjurisdictions to review and comment prior to the formal allocation
recommendation to policy committees in early 2011.
Valley Major Street Program
The Valley Major Street Program is comprised of two sub-programs, the Rail/Highway Grade
Separation Sub-program and the Arterial Sub-program.
Rail/Hi aL5yb-
aroaam: It is unlikely that SANBAG staff will be able to consider
funding any additional projects from the Rail/Highway Grade Separation Sub-program
until the grade separations that have been committed to as part of the Trade Corridors
Improvement F-tmd (TCIF) program have been completed, Work on additional grade
CM10080.5-ss
August 10, 2010
Page 3
separation projects will be heavily dependent on obtaining additional State and federal
funds.
Arterial Sub:pro Local jurisdictions have access to Measure I Major Street Program
arterial funds through either the reserved or unreserved accounts. However, the local
jurisdiction CPNAs for last year (FY 2010-2011) universally assumed that both the
reserved and unreserved accounts would be used. The template to be used for CPA
submittals this year does not distinguish between reserved and unreserved. If you believe
you need to distinguish between reserved and unreserved for this CPNA cycle, pleasc
contact the designated SANBAG staff member, and we will work with you toensure the
distribution of firrids is properly reflected. It is important to remember that the equitable
shares of Major Street Program revenue have already been defined in the Strategic Plan,
and that time-value of money is considered to ensure that these shares will be maintained
over the life of the Measure. With these equity protections in place,jurisdictions do not
need to be concerned about losing access to Measure I funds if they do not have projects
ready to fund early in the Measure. Jurisdictions that do not use their share of funds early
in the Measure will still have access to their share later in the Measure. We have not
included a revenue estimate for Measure I Arterial Sub-program funds with this letter.
For purposes of the CPNA,jurisdictions Ma assume that their all tions for FY 2011-
2012 will be in the same LaMe as for FY 2010-2011, with a 1-2%annual increase for the
subs cent four fiscal,y rs. Each Valley jurisdiction has been previously notified of its
I Ra
FY 2010-2011 allocation. This revenue assumption does not serve as a guarantee of
funds available for allocation for FY 2011-2012. The SANBAG Board may authorize
allocations that are different from these assumptions.
The final apportionment/allocation decision for FY 2011-2012 will occur in approximately
March 2011, after a thorough assessment by the SANBAG Board of the available revenue and all
the project needs,with ample opportunity for comment by member agencies.
Attachment A to this letter contains a checklist to follow when developing the CPNA. It
includes a sample resolution for City Council/Board of Supervisors approval of the CPNA. The
CPNA may also be approved through a Minute Action if that is preferred. The checklist was
created to assist jurisdictions in meeting the requirements established for the CPAs in the
Strategic Plan and will facilitate ease of use when SANBAG conducts the annual cash flow
analysis.
Development Mitigation Annual Report
The Development Mitigation Annual Report is one of the ongoing requirements of the San
Bernardino County Development Mitigation Program and the Congestion Management Program.
The report requires each jurisdiction to provide information on development activity and the
expenditure of development mitigation funds on projects contained in the Nexus Study over the
past fiscal year. The requested report covers development activity and expenditures for the fiscal
year ending June 30,2010. Please attach any fee transaction records that are readily available as
back-up for this report.
CM100805-ss
August 10, 2010
Page 4
The information contained in the Development Mitigation Annual Report will be used to help
establish trends in fee collection and validate the development mitigation funding information
contained in the CPNA, Attachment B shows the format for the Development Mitigation Annual
Report. Copies of the electronic report format will be distributed to your representative on the
SANBAG Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAQ. The report does not need to
be approved by your elected body.
In summary, SANBAG requires that your jurisdiction submit:
1. A signed copy of the resolution for evidence of the approved Minute Action) of your
governing body adopting the CP IA covering fiscal years 2011/2012-2015/2016
2. A copy of the CPNA adopted by your jurisdiction
3, A copy of your Development Mitigation Annual Report
If you have any questions regarding any of the three documents requested, please contact Steve
Smith (LsmiLth
.@sanbgg.ca.go at (909) 884-8276. In addition, we will be available to answer
questions on this request at the August 30 meeting of the TIAC. We to forward to receiving
your submittals by September 30,2010.
cc: TTAC Representative
SANBAG Exectitive Staff
attachments
CM100805-SS
•^1e=�,. � ems, �' ,��" � ° � ' k .:.��� � ,.1 �._.�..®� � P i � a y �"' r ... y^�y-.tS:,.:�� •»
12 x i
1.
.M
`p :..c�. •.•. � + + ax.� y�p'. ' � ��^ _. l� �•��-•,...�j�' �.«..���3 _ yry�,��7p $` 'y���` `.. [ Y
• ��� '+ �� TAY 'ti Y �i-t�t".'-'J���~'� it ���.�A���.111�«`...`�.i�i�€'��'._.''`,.'Jt��JI�����,h,r�.���1.+p4'�����.::+w� T w� �v'�.
'irl�"6"r" P - t .:. •« 1 ,.. a �.. ��;��3��: #F �.:;�tF, _.__ 61R �..l��
..: ;:_ ra » J m., l q_..._. 7P' T:.-,.� �.,� :. R... 4 � `,t�� ✓,».��. `,t .a.v: ..tr '�a
r
I
JURISDICTION MASTER AGREEMENT NO.C10252 BETWEEN SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY AND THE CITY OF REISLANDS
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 21st day of September, 2010 by and between
the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority(hereinafter referred to as"SANBAG) and
the City of Redlands(hereinafter referred to as"CITY");
RECLTALS
WHEREAS, the Measure 1 2010-2040 Strategic Plan identified Valley Major Street
Program- Arterial Sub-program projects eligible for partial funding from Measure 12010-2040
revenues; anal
WHEREAS, this Jurisdiction Master Agreement is to be carried out in accordance with
the policies in the Measure 12010-2040 Strategic Plan; and
WHEREAS, SANBAG has determined that these PROJECTS (Attachment A) are
included in the SANBAG Development Mitigation Nexus Study Capital Project Needs Analysis;
and
WHEREAS, SANBAG will reimburse CITY for the public share of eligible PROJECT
expenditures with Measure 12010-2040 Major Street Program-Arterial Sub-program finids up to
the annual fund allocation amount(Attachment B);
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, SAN13AG and
CITY agree to the following:
AGREEMENT
SECTION I
SANBAG AGREES:
I To reimburse CITY, as provided in Section 111,within 30 days after CITY submits to
SAMA G an original and two copies of the signed invoices in the proper form
covering those actual allowable PROJECT expenditures that were incurred by CITY,
consistent with the invoicing-requirements of the Measure 12010-2040 Strategic Plan,
including backup information. Invoices may be submitted to SA 'AG as frequently
as monthly.
2. When conducting an audit of the costs claimed under the provisions of this
Agreement, to rely to the rnaximum extent possible on, any prior audit of CITY
performed pursuant to the provisions of State and Federal laws. In the absence of
1:'v-,a\djmAV�m,nents9ursidiction Master Agreement.doc
such an audit, work of other auditors will be relied upon to the extent that work is
acceptable to SANBACS when planning and conducting additional audits.
I SANBAG shall assign a project liaison for purposes of coordinating project activities
and invoice review.
SECTION 11
CITY AGREES:
I Only eligible PROJECT-specific work activities, as set forth in Attachment A to this
Agreement, that conform to the SANBAG Nexus Study and are included in first two
years of the current Capital Project Needs Analysis (CPNA) will be eligible for
reimbursement with Measure I Major Street Program-Arterial Sub-program funds.
2. To prepare and submit to SG an original and two copies of signed invoices for
reimbursement of those eligible PROJECT expenses according to Attachment A.
Invoices may be submitted to S as frequently as monthly, up the allocation
limit specified in Appendix A.
I To repay to SANBAG any reimbursement for Measure I costs that are determined by
subsequent audit to be unallowable within ninety (90) days of CITY receiving notice
of audit findings, which time shall include an opportunity for CITY to respond to
and/or resolve the finding. Should the finding not be otherwise resolved and CITY fail
to reimburse moneys due SANBAG within ninety(90) days of audit finding, or within
such other period as may be agreed between both parties hereto, the SANBAG Board
reserves the right to withhold future payments due CITY from any source under
SANBAG's control.
4. To provide 23.1% share of total eligible PROJECT expenses, which represents the
development share, as documented in Attachment B.
5. To maintain all source document, books and records, connected with its performance
under this agreement for a minimum of five(5)years from the date of the Final Report
of Expenditures submittal to SANBAG. During this five (5) year period SANBAG
shall be entitled to inspect and audit all such supporting information. Copies will be
made and furnished by City upon request.
6. To establish and maintain an accounting system conforming to Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP) to support CITY request for reimbursement, payment
vouchers, or invoices which segregate and accumulate costs of PROJECT work
elements and produce monthly reports which clearly identify reimbursable costs,
matching fund costs, indirect cost allocation, and other allowable expenditures by
CITY,
2
Master AgreetnentAm
7. To prepare a Final Report of Expenditures, including a final invoice reporting the
actual eligible PROJECT costs expended for those activities described in the work
activities, and to submit that Report and invoice no later than 120 days following the
completion of those expenditures. The Final Report of Expenditures, an original and
two copies of which report shall be submitted to SANBAG, must state that these
PROJECT funds were used in conformance with this Agreement and for those
PROJECT-specific work activities described.
8. To have a PROJECT-specific audit completed by SANBAG, at SANBAG's option,
upon completion of the PROJECT. The audit must state that all funds expended on
the PROJECT were used in conformance with this Agreement.
9. To include SANBAG in Project Development Team (PDT) meetings, if and when
such meetings are held and related communications on project progress and to provide
at least quarterly schedule updates to SANBAG. SANBAG shall assign a project
liaison for the purpose of attending PDT meetings.
10. As an eligible PROJECT expense, to post signs when PROJECT begins at the
boundaries of the PROJECT noting that PROJECT is funded with Measure I funds.
Signs shall bear the logos of San Bernardino Associated Governments and City of
Redlands.
SECTION III
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED:
I. To abide by all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations pertaining to
the PROJECT, including policies in the applicable program in the Measure 12010-
2040 Strategic Plan, as amended, as of the date of execution of this agreement,
1 SANBAG's financial responsibility shall be 76.9% of actual cost for eligible
PROJECT expenditures, up to the allocation limit specified in Attachment A. An
estimate of costs for each PROJECT PHASE is provided in Attachment A.
3. CITY may be reimbursed in a subsequent fiscal year for expenditures in excess of the
allocation limit for the current fiscal year, based on invoices for eligible PROJECT
expenditures. SANBAG retains the option to reimburse CITY no more than 50% of
the public share of excess expenditures for the current fiscal year within the first six
months of the subsequent fiscal year,with the remaining 50%to be reimbursed in the
second six months of the fiscal year. SANBAG shall inform the jurisdiction within
30 days of receipt of an invoice for the excess expenditures, if it chooses to exercise
that option.
4If CITY does not expend funds up to the allocation limit in Attachment 13 within the
current fiscal year, the unused portion may be applied to eligible PROJECT
3
1- aidji,n�AgremcaitsVursidiction Master AVeemmdoc
expenditures in the subsequent fiscal year, in addition to the allocation limit for the
subsequent year. A cumulative allocation limit will be maintained in Attachment B.
The cumulative allocatio-n limit will be reconciled against the CPNA submittals
beginning with the submittals for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 and adjusted,as appropriate,
in the apportionment and allocation process beginning that fiscal year.
5. Eligible PROJECT reimbursements shall include only those costs incurred by CITY
for PROJECT-specific,work activities.
6. Neither SANBAG nor any officer or employee thereof is responsible for any injury,
damage or liability occurring or arising by reason of anything done or omitted to be
done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction
delegated to CITY under this Agreement- It is understood and agreed that, pursuant
to Government Code Section 895.4, CITY shall fully defend, indemnify and save
harmless SAN-BAG, its officers and employees from all claims, suits or actions of
every name, kind and description brought for or on account of injury (as defined by
Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of anything done or omitted to
be done by CITY under or in connection with any work, authority or jurisdiction
delegated to CITY under this=Agreement. CITY's indemnification obligation applies
to SANBAG's "passive!' negligence but does not apply to SANBAGs "sole
negligence"or"willful misconduct" within the meaning of Civil Code Section 2782.
CITY and SANBAG are autborizzd self-insured public entities for purposes of
Professional Liability, General Liability, Automobile Liability and Workers'
Compensation and warrant that through their respective programs of self insurance,
they have adequate coverage or resources to protect against liabilities arising out of
the performance of the terms, conditions or obligations of this agreement.
7. This Agreement is expressly subordinated to any bonds, notes, certificates or other
evidences of indebtedness involved in bond financings as are now outstanding or as
may hereafter be issued by SANBAG.
8. The terms of this Agreement represent the consent of the CITY to provide the full
development share for the PROJECT required by the SANBAG Nexus Study and that
failure to contribute the development share according to the terms of this agreement
does not obligate SANBAG to provide supplemental funds or otherwise remedy that
failure. SANBAG may terminate this agreement if the CITY fails to perform
according to the to of this Agreement and if this failure jeopardizes the delivery of
the PROJECT according to the terms herein.
9. SANBAG shall track the CITY equitable share of the Valley Arterial Sub-program,
including adjustments for the time-value of money based on time of apportionment of
Measure I ftmds,per Strategic Plan Policy 40001 NS-1.
4
t1c4%djm\AgreementsVui-sidicfion Master Agreement.dor,
San Bernardino County CLq of Redlands
Trams,Ro rtatlon Authority
By_ By:
President, SANBAG Board of Pat Gilbreath
Directors :['payor
Kato. late:
Attest:
Smn Irwin
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
PROCEDURE: PROCEDURE:
By. By:
Jean-Dene Basle Daniel T. McHugh
SAIBAG County Counsel City Attorney
Date: Date:,
5
1:\caNdjn,i\AgreementsJtirsidiction Master Agrees nt.doc
Attachment A
Project(s)Eligible for Expenditure/Reimbursement of"
NU ValleyArterial Funds for the City of Redlands($1,000s
Install a traffic signal at the intersection of 6th St and 1-10(EB) Ramps
Total Project Cost$225,000
Eligible Public Share.$173,025
Nexus Study Share: 23.1 aI
Phase Prior FYIt1111 FYI 1/12 Total
Project DevIEnviron Doc(PA&ED)
MI Valley Arterial Funds $ $ $
Development Fees $ $ $
Plaits, Specifications and Estimates(P E)
Pail Valley Arterial Funds $ 7.69 $ $ $ 7.69
Development Fees $ 2.31 $ $; 2.31
Right of Way Acquisition(ROW)
MI Valley Arterial Funds $ $ - $ $
Development Fees $ $ - $ -
Construction(CONST)
MI Valley.Arterial Funds $ - $ 165,34 $ $ 165,34;
Development,Fees $ $ 49.66 $ $ 49,66
Total Project
MI Valley Arterial $ 7.69 $ 165.34 $ $ 173.03
Development Fees $' 2.31 $ 49.66 $._ $ 51.97
6t .�t
Install a traffic signal at the intersection of 6th Bt and 1-10(WB) Ramps
Total Project Cost$225,00
Eligible Public Share:.$173,025'
Nexus stud Falr Share:23.1°l
Phase Prior FY10/11 FYI 1/12 Total
Project Dev/Environ Doc(PA )
MI Valley Arterial Funds $ _ $ $ $
Development Fees $` - $; $ $
Plans, Specifications and Estimates(P &E)
MI Valley Arterial Funds $ 7.69 $ _ $ - $ 7.69
Development Fees $ 2.31i $ $ $ 2.31
Right of Way Acquisition(ROW)
MI Valley Arterial Funds $ - $ $ - $ -
Development Fees $ $ $ $ -
Construction(CONST)
Ali Valley Arterial Funds $ - $ $ 165:34; $ 165.34
Development Fees $ - $ $ 49.66 $ 49.616
Total Project
lutl Valley Arterial Funds $ 7.69 $ - 165.34 $ 173.003
l levelr prnent fees $ 2.31 $ - $ , 49,66 $ 51.97
1:1atdjtn\.A ree entsUur-sidiction Master Agreement,doc
Attachment
Allocation Lit and Program Accounting of
MI Valley Arterial Funds for the City of Redlands
tP r iot l it rirMO urst "
FY 10/11 MI Walley Arterial Allocation 311,2010.00
FY 10111 Projected Prior Adv Exp Reimbursement 7,690,00
FY 101191 Projected New MIExpenditures 173,028.00
FY 10/11 Projected New till Adv Expenditures
Additional Pr rammin Ca aci-ty $ 1301,485.00
Cumulative Allocation 311,200.00
Cumulative Reimbursements*
Outstanding Advance Expenditures 7,690.00
Includes both reimbursed project and advance expenditures.
7
1 tca4djtit\A r nenf"JursidiCtion Master Agreement.dat