HomeMy WebLinkAbout4188_CCv0001.pdf RESOLUTION NO. 4188
�' rg~,E`�� `F w�s W°" O o-,s "w I T CITY wt �'^°:$may�"S ,'¢.�: :- a THE E C T"fir OF
w. ;�A E D '� '�'",: `D *.
`I�. .0 a.a[.5 i..}'kw F ! ��,N#� '+d.». x.,4,S r, .+a 5..�4�. ..�.,�-# � �.L `+.= ., J. :: ,5 �A""�3:.;�..„,�5,„f.
SUPPORTING
nT"eN T ' i AREQUEST
�EQE ~ TS fA SERVICE
� . ro AUTIFIORITY FOR,
FREEWAY „MtG NIpyBE
ESTABLISHED bTTS D
:.
WHEREASO Chapter 14 of Division 3 of the Streets ancl
Highways 'ode was recently addedtothe Statutes j! 1985
providing for the establishment of a Service Authority for
Freeway Emergencies (SAFE) if the Board of Supervisors of the
count said s majority he cities within the county having
a majority of the population adopt resolutions providing for
the establishment of the authority; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redlands finds
that a freeway emergency motorist aid syster: is needed to
protect thesafety motorists on freeways; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Redlands finds
that a freeway emergency motorist aid system it; neveded to
seduce the time spent by ,awof ceu. en officers cerresponding
to routine vehicle disablements; and
irtiple-
menting a freeway emergency motorist systent in the san
Bernardino/Riverside County region;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS
does hereby request. that a Service Authority for Freeway
Emergencies be established in San Bernardino/Riverside Co nty
pursuant to Section 2550 of the Streets and Highway Code.
L.� .�. FURTHER RESOLVED, that �k'"r;.� City Council .d. E,.i„o,
Cit Rediaai s directs that he members of the San
Bernardino Associated Government s/River side County Transpor-
tation Commission zshall serve as t'he Service Authority for
Freeway Emergencies in the County of San Bernardino/Riverside
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED :.his- 5th (lay.. Of AUgLISt,-
1985 .
N
Mayor of the City of Redlands
ATTEST:
. �µ 2
n
I, Lorrie Poy2er, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the
City Council of the City of Redlands, at aregular 4meeting
thereof held on the 3th day of August, 1986, by the following
vote:
AYES: Councilmember s, Larsen, DeMir 3yn, Johnson, Wormser;
Mayor Beswick
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
My Clerk
Resolution No. 4188
Page two
The SanBernardino County Transportation Commission
SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS
A PLANNING COUNCIL OF COOPERATING INTERACTIVE GOVERNMENTS
Wells Fargo Building, 334 W. Third Street, Suite 401
San Bernardino, California 92401 (714) 884-8276
April 28, 1986
Individually addressed
to City Clerks
(see attached list)
Dear City Clerk:
San Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG) , in a in effort
with the Riverside County Transportation Commission, recently co-
funded a consultant study to determine the feasibility of
implement-ling a freeway emergency call box system in Riverside and
San Bernardino Counties . The consultant report showed that
utilizing revenue through the implementation of SB 1199,
Riverside and San Bernardino Counties could generate sufficient
revenue to jointly fund and operate an 800 to 900 freeway call
box system. The SB. 1199 legislation enables a courity SAFE
(Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies) to impose a fee of up
to one dollar per registered motor vehicle per year to finance,
build and operate a freeway call box system within its
boundaries .
The SAFE system itself will be directed by a governing board
composed of two members cafe the Board of Supervisors and seven
city elected representatives ; a subset of the SANBAG Board is
contemplated.
The tonsultant report was reviewed by the SANBAG Board at the
April 2, 1986 board meeting. The SANTBAG Board approved the
report and requested SANBAG staff to initiate the implementation
process for establishing a SAFE program in San Bernardino County.
The- initial step is to obtain the approval , by Resolution, of the
County Board of Supervisors and a majority of the cities (having
a majority of the population of the incorporated cities) .
To facilitate your agency' s consideration of the establishment of
a SAFE, SANBAG staff have enclosed excerpts from the SAFE
consultant study. These include the Executive Summary,
Conclusions and Recommendations , a copy of SB 1199, draft
resolutions , and population estimates for Riverside and San
Bernardino County cities . Should you need additional
information, SANBAG has available a few complete copies of the
consultant report. You may also call Mr. Wes McDaniel, Executive
Director, or myself, Mr. Kerry Forsythe, at the SANBAG office at
(714) 884-8276 should you, have any questions. Your SANBAG
representative is also informed on this issue.
CITIES OF-ADELANTO,BAR TOW,BIG BEAR LAKE,CHINO, LTON.PONTANA,GRAND TERRACE,LOMA LIN0A,MONTCLAJR,
NEEDLES,ONTARIO,RANCHO CUCAMONGA,RE LANDS,RIALTO,SAN BERNARDINO,UPLAND-VICTC)RVII t r rM4401",t N't CA At C--
We would urge your agency to adopt the enabling Resolution for
the development of a SAFE program in our county. It is important
that this action be in a timely manner. Collections of the added
one dollar on vehicle registration cannot start until the SAFE is
approved and formalized. Early "approval will allow collections
to begin sooner, and the fund to grow while details and final
approvals on the location and operation of equipment are worked
out between the SAFE , Caltrans, and the California Highway
Patrol . Other counties are currently considering implementing a
SAFE program. We would like to move our program ahead and
complete negoti'ations with Caltrans and the California Highway
Patrol as soon as possible to avoid any hold up in processing due
to a rush of SAFE applications from other counties. Riverside is
already underway gathering Resolutions , aiming at our joint
program.
(your City Council )
Please place this Resolution before the Board of Supervisors and
transmit adopted copies to us .
Sincerely,
Kerry Forsythe
Assistant Director
cc: City Managers
SANBAG Board Members
Deborah Barmack
CL-86-161
N ,or t h
Riverside Count
Transportation fission
and the
San Bernardino Associated
{
Governments
on a
Service Authority car
Freeway Emergencies
(SAFE)
March 1986
M
�r
8
r
A t EMS R OF ARTHUR'YOUNII !LATER 1ATIONAC_
P.O? E cx 241
March 12, 1986
Mr . Barry Beck
�
`eLItiCTe Director
Riverside County Transportation C rL i;ssio'r
4075 gain Street, Room Sfl
Riverside, California 92501
,fir . Wesley McDaniel
Executive Director
San Bernardino Associated Governments
Suite 401, Wells Fargo Building
334 W. Third Street
San Bernardino, California 92401
Lear Messrs . Peck: and McDaniel :
We are pleased to present our final report on the Service
Authority for Freeway Emergencies ( SAFE) . The report descr bes
San Bernardino and, Riverside Counties " feasibility of develotping
a SAFE.
The study determined that the Counties can afford to imple-,tent
emergency freeway call boxes . The revenues provided by SB 1 199
appear sufficient to finance a system, of approximately 500- call
boxes : The Counties are able to develop SAFEEs independently or
jointly; however , the economics are persuasive for a joint
coeration
We have enjoyed working with you on this project . if we may be
of further assistance , please contact me at (714 ) 85 0-9500 .
Very truly yours ,
Larry M. Seigel
of Arthur Young & Company
March 12, 1986
EXECUTIVE SU_MJ,1ARY
A. What does SB 1199 enable counties to accomplish?
SIB 1199 enables a local county SAFE to receive up to $1 per
registered motor vehicle each year to finance, build and
operate a freeway call-box system.
B. What are the major leoi slat ive/opera tional requiremnents, and
constraints?
1 . Legislative Requirements
a. The SAFE must be authorized by a County and the
majority of the cities representing a majority of
the population in the County.
b. The SAFE authority shall consist of seven members :
a Two members selected by the Board of Super-
visors
• Five members jointly selected by the affected
cities .
C. The SAFE plan must be reviewed and approved by the
California Highway Patrol (CHP ) and Caltrans .
2. Operational Requirements/Constraints
a. Revenue is limited to she $1 per vehicle registra-
tion each year .
b. State agencies may prescribe call-box intervals
that may be financially infeasible ( i .e. , 1/4 mile
rather than 1/2 or one mile spacing) .
c The CHP will provide all dispatch services of the
SAFE system All Com? ccsts will be reimbursed by
the SAFE
d. implementation may be delayed to enable the CSP t
develop the required dispatch capability.
C. mow might the proposed system be configured'
The mos Angeles County" system has boxes at 1/4 mile inter-
vats . Financially and operationally, other counties appear
to favor at least 1, mile spacing in heavily traveled
areas . At 1/2 mile, the motorist is never .further than 1/
mile ahead or behind of a call-box. It, is feasible to 'have
r
differentiatedspacing based upon, the traffic density.
call box system with 1 mi-le spacing would provide coverage
primarily within the metropolitan areas ,; considering the
available funding provided by SB 1199 . Alternatively, it is
ocssible to cover all major highways in both Counties more
regularly by increasing the spacing of the call boxes based
on the traffic density. The boxes will communicate with a,
CHP dispatch center which will call: for road service,
emergency" help;, or relay a :,:essag`e to a third party for
assistance,
What is the approximate ranee o costs for a sy tem
Costs depend on the technology used and the spacing of the
call-boxes. Annual costs are comprised bf o er t`i.ng/
maintenance expenses and debt service payments for the
capital investment .. Preliminary annual cost estimates are:
intensive Service
For Heavily
Widespread Service Traveled Areas
4866 boxed ( 800 boxes)
Ooerating Canita.i* a
rting Caooital`
$377 , 000 $0657 , 000 $596 , 00O $587 , 000
*The es rmates assume use of existing microwave stations
for the radio units .
E. khat are the relevant techn "fogies?
Two technologies appear most likely to meet Riverside and
San Bernardino; Counties needs . These technologies and
major advantages disadvantages are summarized in the
following table::
-
Technolq
_qy Description Advantages Disadvaataqes
Cellular Radio signals Easily moved * Theft
transmitted to target
and from hard- Produces
wire phones reports on 0 Cell cover-
system status age
and use
Modern tech- 0 Early in
nology development
Transmit road
census data
to computer
Self checking
• Vandal resis-
tant
• Call forward-
ing
Weather t-oler-
ant
Conventional Radio signals sent Easily moved No auto-
Radio to and from cis- ina t-i c
patch center Weather toler- reporting
ant
Produces reports
on system status
and use
Vandal resistant
F. That types of financing alternatives are available?
Operating and maintenance costs are normally paid as
ex-Denses are incurred during the year . The major capital
investment required to build and equip the system can be
financed over a period of years to "smooth" the cash outflow
over the expected life of the system.
We have identified three basic alternative approaches to
financing the capital costs of the system:
Revenue bonds or similar instruments could be
issued to pay for the equipment and its instal-
lation, with a portion of annual registration fees
pledged to debt service.
3
A leasing company could purchase and install the
ecTuin-ment and lease the system, to the SAFE. Tax
benefits under this approach might reduce costs
below the first ootion .
• Under a privatization, arrangement a private firm
could install , own and maintain the call boxes and
sell the system' s services to the SAFE under a
service contract . Additional tax benefits might
be available under this arrangement, further
reducing overall costs .
G. What are the major maintenance and operating concerns?
Although the cost and degree off maintenance varies with the
selected technology, maintenance does not appear to be a
major cd.ncern . The major operating concerns include:
The cost and lead time 'or developing the CHP
dispatch capability .
Ealancing State acenc_y guidelines , motorist con-
venience and the available' funding .
• Developing a reliable and effective capability to
oversee the implementation , operation aZnad Monitor
ing of the SAFE system. Another issue raised by
some jurisdictions is liability. -This has not
been a major consideration in Los Angeles ' exper-
ience, and all aspects of liability have not been
fully explored. The SAFE agency should consult-
legal
onsultlegal counsel about this matter .
H. What guidance would be useful to the Counties regarding
SIB 11019? .
The attached report provides SA PAG RCS?'C and other jurLs-
dictions with substantial infc.-mation about establishing a
SAFE system. The most in.racrtant guidance we found in our
study was:
Dic evelop a specifand thorough implementation,
plan.
Conduct a thorough and comoetent analysis and
procurement of the various technologies .
Act as quickly as ocssible to begin the SAFE
process . This is important for beginning the
revenue collection orocess and receiving early
CHP/Caltrans approve'-, .
4
i . What role may be appropriate for SANSAG and the ROTC?
The seven voting members of RCTC and a subcommittee of the
SAN AC Board could serve as SAFE- s . They would provide an
effective, economical and t1me-saving approach for SAFE
administrative and management services . San Bernardino and
Riverside can jointly form one SAFEE having authority in both
Counties . SANE and RCTC can form a subcommittee to act as
the SAFE. operating and staffing economies warrant consid-
eration of one joint SAFE systen. instead of a system for
each County. The SAFE system could be established as a
project and reimbursed on the basis of expenditures and
services provided.
EXHIBIT I-2
Page 1 of 2
SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTY
HIGHWAYS USED FOR REPORT INFORMATION
San Bernardino County Riverside County
Highway Number Highway Number
2 10
10 15
15 60
18 62
30 71
38 74
40 78
58 79
60 86
62 91
71 95
95 111
127 177
138 195
178 215
215 243
247 371
330
395
Average Daily
1 r 1 c
e�
Estimates
A4 I
'diet •!4w w _ "u x �'. 4; � ''1 �
s
a
,I' MC+[hL"f RWP:KrI tl Ns,'°+
4
s "
a
a
,.F i*t t iiSa.7.ii'R.. .� ". , ,°`'�. i#P vM.e•
At 14INAI,
...a,.. ..,� a1#'RAS
i
Y N{,xpw s,n.-. wev
rs4
R
e�
a
h
ease.
3
i
125,001 to 150,000
s RV +
"�ieesTAfe.w: rifar+€p r°{ R'f: e:
"n
a
110
y f t.i Ri afnl vrilde � I ^' .. o r:� { YTakr RM1t
rx 1, ti
', eN
Cu.,, TRF/H)NL'e T 4pa
Ct+7A11 v--
100,001 to 125,000 Ao
LM s
rr `
.k,.a4, t .k " KL tHui xxM
w. ' fr.
a .. a
AN
Al Bµ
75,001 to 100,000
• t Rliki.�hdd# V. { r.
r e ps:
^r
fAiiAPdaa
to
$!e;G`^ -----_ it _9�
Wy�f,. °..a txN•k r" 5 H1F M'.F.� +
10 i to a i_..
fie. a
4 F Y s k F
50,001 t� 75,00 '
.„�
10l.
a ` ena
it
I FiSM1i1 :A. '�rtf'+y ire � *de Abvina r+”
25,00 t ,
ff +'
�.HY§tyd 'eb. , , �,;f`�s.� «$ #"a• � i,«»." R t .NieY M�eV1a'u4 ",
4#
S"{ s
r
° c IA Aht �, � a.YVHX
fib#iipY a^'"�: 44
ttrt.'af AC kAC74M rir
s rr,.,•. 'i P � -. + "� tarp ..f.• I
r
^
iFAtFCT M45YMi#¢
Less than 2 f ..
e r H
AN
ars w� , •a w , v;
w w r
►
To illustrate one financial scenario -- if San Bernardino
and Riverside Counties implement a call box system with 860
telephones as shown in Exhibit 111-9 , the financial situation is
estimated as follows:
Number of units ( 124 Cellular and
736 radio) 860
Revenue $1,235 , 000
Annual Expenditures :
Capital Repayment ( 8% amortization
for 10 years) 657, 000
Operating/maintenance costs 377 , 000
Total costs $1,034 , 000
Amount available for administration
and contingencies
As shown above , with a hypothetical widespread 860 call
box system, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties would- have
approximately $200, 000 available for administrative and contin-
gency ex eases These revenue and cost estimats assume the
following three points :
$1 . 2 million revenue, in the first full operating
year .
Increases in operating costs being covered by
growth in vehicle registrations .
A midpoirilk- estimate for each of the two technol-
ogies .
Exhibit IV-1 is a preliminary estimate 44'-:o r the two
Counties . It is based upon the illustrative :860 �qidesz)read call
box system (from Exhibit 111-9) being phased in beginning July
1987 . It shows that it is possible for the Counties to establish
a "sinking" fund which can be used in the future . By July 1987
the SAFLE's might obtain almost $qoo, 000 to use as a "sinking"
Lund.
IV-5
V. CONCLUSIONS ILND R-ECOMMENDATIONS
A. CONCLUSIONS
1 . There appears to be a high level of interest in
implementing emergency call box systems in both
Counties and throughout California. '
2 . Los Angeles County officials , the CHP and Los
Angeles County ' s residents appear to regard the
call-boxes as a valuable service for public safety
and convenience. The boxes are heavily used and
receive high public appreciation.
3 . San Bernardino and Riverside Counties aoDear to be
able to finance a system with approximately 800 to
900 call boxes .
4 . A configuration with a Brea ger number of call boxes
may not be financially viable, depending on the
technology used.
5 . Payments to CHP for dispatching are uncertain and
may substantially reduce the funds available to
build and operate the SAFE system. DMV costs are
not yet decided.
6 . Caltrans costs and potential subsidies are uncer-
tain and need further ex-oloration.
7 . SAIN3AGs and R'CTC` s existing governance st-ructure
and staff caoabilities nay provide effective and
timely means of conducting the SAFE authority
operations .
9 . A SAFE emergency call-box system appears to be
achievable and benefic-, al for San Bernardino end
Riverside Counties .
10 . Rapid decision-making, planning and implementation
actions by both counties could position the
Counties ahead of other applications for S' VE
approval and processing by state agencies.
V-1
B. RECOMMENDATIONS
Exhibit -1 on the followingpage presents steps we have
identified as necessary to move ahead with a SAFE system. These
steps include.
1 . Establishing a SAFE authority by obtaining Counties
and cities approval-. SANSAG and RCTC would be
excellent bodies to comprise the SAFE authority .
2 . Notifying DM's? that the SAFE authority is e tab
lished and therefore the revenue collection process
should begin.
3. Further investigating ( including de onstrations
and/or site visits ) the available call-box tech-
nologies .
4 . Preparing a more specific financing and cash flow
plan..
5. Conduct a study to determine more precisely the
availability of radia frequencies, cellular
coverage, and the number and location of base
_..
stations and ether equipment .
6. Developing a better understanding of DMV, CHP and
Caltrans requirements, fees and possible conces-
sions . Negotiations , should be started as soon as
passible to secure the best possible arrangements
for beth counties ,
7 . Finalizing a detailed SAFE implementation plan and
schedule.
. Developing a- request for bids and selecting an
appropriate technology.
9 . Developing an effective` public information program.
10. Obtaining an opinion from legal counsel regarding
the management of potential liability.;
If State agencies require additional call-boxes, the
Counties have several alternatives:
-2
San Domardino Associatod Govornments
and tho
Rivorsido CounLy Ti-ansporttfflon Comm]--slon
Prollminary jUiplemontationj Ii xj it j:gj0jC'Y Freoway Call
t 9116 1997 19A3,IW-
fob. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul, Aug. SeVt. Oct, NovDoc, Jan. fob, Mar. Apr, May Jun, Jul. Aug. Sopt, Oct. Nov. Doc. Jan,
Receive SAFE Report
County Resolutions
Establishing SAF13 0
Cities Adopt. Resolutions
Meetings with State Agencies
Notify DMV cc:Revenue 0
Collection
Ne8oliale Agreements with
State Agencies
•
Conduct-Engineering Studies
• Investigate &select
Technologies
_0
• Define Pinancing Plan
0
• Obtain Counsel re:Liability
• Obtain Financing
# Prepare RFD for Equiptuont —0 1
Anil Installation
# Select Vendors
* Prepare Final Design
Implementation Plan ro April I lfib
* Installation (phased)
* Develop Public Education
Program
Lt
1 . Attempt to stretch out the financing plan to accom-
modate the increased cost (longer term financing,
phased implementation, deferred capital payments,
etc. ) .
2. Attempt to negotiate less demanding terms from the
Mate.
3 . Meet with Legislators to request provisions for
raising additional revenue.
V-3
APPENDICES
page I cel 3
Senate Bill No. 1199
CHAPTER 1350
An act to add Section 131.1 to,and tis add Chapter 14 (commencing
with Section 2SZO) to Division 3 of, the Streets and Highways Code,
and to add Sections Z421.5 and 9250.10 to the Vehicle Code, relating
to streets and highways.
[Approved by O*vernor September 30, 1985. Fled with
Se-c-etary of State October 1, 19M.)
LEGISLkTIVE COU SF-L'S DIGEST
SB 1199, Craven. Service< authority for freeway emergencies:
motor vehicle registration fees- increase.
(1) Under exiisting law, the Department of Transportation has full
possession and control of all state highways in the Califorrda Freeway
and Expressway System. .4
T`l�bill would authorize the board of supervisors of a courity and
a majority of the cities within the county having a majority of the
population to establish, a service authority for freeway emergencies
with 7 mernbers. An established authority would be authorized to
impose additional fee$, not to exceed $1 per year, on vehicles
registered within the county, as prescribed.
(2) Under existing law,registration fees on motor vehicles may be
used for, ainong other things, st-,eet and highway purposes:_
This bill would require the payment of an additional registration
fee imposed by an authority for motor vehicles in subject counties,
except those exempted under law, and would require those fees to
be distributed to the appropriate authority after deduction of
admi-rustrative costs by the Department of Motor Vehicles. !'he bill
would authorize an authority to use the fees for the implementation
of an emergency motorist aid system, as specified,on portions of the
California Freeway and Expressway System in the county. 'Me bill
would authorize an authority to issue revenue bonds for the purposes
of the bill and to pledge fees as revenues,as specified.T1 he bill would
authorize the Department of Transportation arid require the
Department of the Ca_lYornia Highway Patrol to enter into contracts
for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the aid system
with any established authority, as specified. The authority would be
required to reimburse both departments for all costs incurred under
the bilL
71&people of Lhe State of CaLtornia do enact as fa s:
SE Oft 1. Section 131.1 is added to the Streets and Highways
Code, to read:
131.1. Upon the request of any Service Authority for Freeway
Page 2 of 3
Ch. 1350
Emergencies that,has imposed additional fees on vehicles pursuant
to Section 9250.10 of the Vehicle Code,the department may contract
with the authority for the installation,operation,and maintenance of
emergency call boxes 6n portions of the California Freeway and
Expressway System within the county. The service authority shall,
reimburse the department for all costs incurred under this section.
SEC. 2. Chapter 14 (commencing with Section 2550) is added to
Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, to read:
CRAP-mn 14. Sr-RvicE: Aui-F.ORrry Foo FPmENVAY EMF-RC ENNCrES
2550, A Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies may be
established in any county if the bard of supervisors of the county
and a majority of the cities within the county having a majority of the
population adopt resolutions providing for the establishment of the
authority.
2551. An authority established under this section shall have 7
members, with 2 members selected by the board of supervisors and
5 members selected jointly by the affected cities.
2:5-52- The authority may, contract and may undertake any -act
convenient or necessary to carry out this chapter and any other law
relating to the authority.
2553. Any authority established under this chapter may impose a
fee,not to exceed one dollar (SI) per year,on vehicles registered in
the county pursuant to Section 9250.10 of the Vehicle Code.
2554. The moneys received by each authority pursuant to
subdivision (b) of Section 9250,10 of the Vehicle Code shall be used
for the implementation, maintenance and operation of an
emergency motorist aid system, including, but not limited to,
L
emergency call boxes and emergency mechanical service patrols ion
the portions of the CaLiforma Freeway and Expressway Systern
located Nithin the county in which the authority is established-The
Departm. ent of Transportation amend the Department of the California
Highway Patrol shall each review and approve plans for
implementation of an emergency motorist aid system proposed for
any state highway route and si.all be reimbursed by the service
authority for all costs incurred.
An authority may construct and maintain the facilities of an
emergency motorist aid system or it may contract -Mth a private
person or entity to do so,
2055. Any service authority may, pursuant to Chapter' 6
(commencing with Section 54300) of Division 2 of Title 5 of the
Government Code, issue revenue bonds for the purposes of this
chapter and pledge revenues to be received from the fees.
SEC. 3. Section 2421.5 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read.
2421.5, When any Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies
L
has imposed additional fees on vehicles pursuant to Section 2553 of
the Streets and Highways Code, the department shall answer calls
92 80
Page 3 of
Ch. 1350
and provide central dispatching services for the system on the
portions of the California Freeway and Expressway Systlern within
the county. The department shall deter and authorize the
service providers eligible to participate in the system. The service
authority shall reimburse the department for all costs incurred under
this scotion.
SEC. 4. Section 9250.10 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
9250.10 (a) In addition to any other fees specified in this code
and the revenue and Taxation Code, any additional fees imposed by
a Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies pursuant to Section
2M3 of the Streets and Highways Code shall he paid to the
denartment at the time of registration or renewal of registration of
every vehicle subject to registration under this code in the subject
counties, except those vehicles that are expressly exempted under
this code from the payment of reg�stTzaticn fees.
(b) A-fter dedticting its administrative costs, the department shall
distribute the additional fees collected purstiant to sub-dNision (a) to
the authority in the county in which they were collected.
91.7 90
/29/86 San Bernardino Associated Governments Page
LIST OF GROUP MEMBERS
City/County Clerks
ART ERBURN, DE LORIS
CITY CLERK, CITY OF ONTARIO
(714) 986-1151 ( - 105
303 EAST "B" STREET
ONTARIO, CA, 91764
AUTHELD , BEVERLY
CITY CLERK, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
(714) 989-1851 ( - 106
9320 BASELINE ROAD #C
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA, 91730
BLACKWELL, JEAN
CITY CLERK,, CITY OF BARSTOW
(619) 256-3531 ( - 160
220 EAST MOUNTAIN VIEW STREET
BARSTOW, CA, 92311
BYRNES , PAMELA
CITY CLERK, CITY OF LOMA LINDA
(714) 796-2531 102
11.128 ANDERSON
LOMA LINDA, CA, 92354
CARPENTER, DOREEN
CITY CLERK, CITY OF UPLAND
(714) 982-1352 110
P. O. BOX 460
UPLAND , CA, 91786
CLARK, SHAUNA
CITY CLERK, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
(714) 383-5002 ( - 109
300 NORTH D STREET
SAN BERNARDINO, CA, 92418
CRAWFORD , MARGARET A.
CITY CLERK, CITY OF MONTCLAIR
(714) 626-8571 ( - 103
5111 BENITO STREET
MONTCLAIR, CA, 91763
DUGHMAN, ILENE
CITY CLERK, CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
(714) ,824-7006 ( - 101
22795 BARTON ROAD
GRAND TERRACE, CA, 92324
1/29/86 San Bernardino Associated Governments Page 2
LIST OF GROUP MEMBERS
City/County Clerks
MURRAY, PATRICIA M.
CITY CLERK, CITY OF FONTANA
(714) 350-7603 (714) 350-7603 100
P 0 BOX 518
FONTANA, CA, 92335
PORTER, PAULA
CITY CLERK, CITY OF VICTORVILLE
(619) 245-3411 ( - ill
14343 CIVIC DRIVE
VICTORVILLE , CA, 92392
POYZER, LORRIE
CITY CLERK, CITY OF REDLANDS
(714) 793-2641 (714) 793-2641 107
P 0 BOX 280
REDLANDS , CA, 92373
PUCKETT, EUNICE
CITY CLERK, CITY OF ADELANTO
(619) 246-8606 159
P. O. BOX 10
ADELANTO, CA, 92301
RAMOS,, HELEN
CITY CLERK, CITY OF COLTON
(714) 370-5034 ( - 99
650 NORTH LA CADENA DRIVE
COL ON, CA, 92324
SALLIS , CHERYL
CITY CLERK, CITY OF NEEDLES
(619) 326-2113 104
P 0 BOX 887
NEEDLES , CA, 92363
SAMPSON, JOSEPH H.
CITY CLERK, CITY OF RIALTO
(714) 875-3410 ( - 108
150 SOUTH PALM AVENUE
RIALTO, CA, 92376
SEKERAK **1 MARTHA
CLERK TO BD , OF SUPV, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
(714) 383-2149 ( - 56
175 WEST FIFTH STREET
SAN BERNARDINO, CA, 92415
/29/86 Ban Bernardino Associated Governments Page 3
LIST OF GROUP MEMBERS
City/County Clerks
'RRELL, LEE
CITY CLERK, CITY OF CHINO
{714} 627-7577 { } - 98
13220 CENTRAL AVENUE
CHINO, CA, 91710
ZOBEL, IVY -
CITY CLERK, CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE
{619} 866-5831 { } - 161
P. O. BOX 2800
BIG BEAR LAKE , CA, 92315
"T APPENDIX B
Page 1 of 2
(DRAFT)
RESOLUTION REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH
SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY F-14—ERGENCIES
ON THE MOTION OF seconded by
the following resolution is
adopted:
WFIEREAe, Chapter 14 of Division 3 of the Streets and
Highways Code was added by Chapter of the Statutes of 1985
providing for the establishment of a Service Authority for
Freeway 'Emergencies ( SAFE) if the Board of Supervisors of the
county and a maioritv of the cities within the county having a
majority of the papulation adopt resolutions providing for the
establishment of the authority; and
WHEREAS, the City Council
finds that a freeway emergency motorist aid system is needed to
protect the safety of motorists on freeways; and
WHEREAS, the City Council
finds that a freeway emergency motorist aid system is needed to
.L
reduce the time spent by law enforcement officers responding to
routine vehic-le disablements ; and
WHEREAS, SAFE will have responsibility for implementing
a freeway emergency motorist aid system in the San Bernardino/
Riverside County region;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED AND ORDERED, That the City
Council of the City of hereby requests that a
Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies be established in San
Bernardino/Riverside County pursuant to Section 2550 of the
Streets and Highways Code .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the
directs that the members of the San Bernardino Associated
Governments/Riverside County Transportation Commission shall
serve as the Service Authority for Freeway Emergencies in the
County of San Bernardino/Riverside .
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of
State of California, on this day of
1986, by the following vote:
AYES-
NOES:
ABSENT:
APPENDIX B
Page 2 of
(DRAFT)
RESOLUTION REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH
SERVICE AUTHORITY FOR FREEWAY F-KERGENCIES
ON THE MOTION OF � seconded by
adopted, the followingresolution is
WHEREAS, Chapter 14 of Division S of the Streets and
Highways Code was added by Chapter' of the Statutes of 1985
providing for the establishment of a: Service Authority for
Freeway Emergencies ( SAFE) if the Board of Supervisors of the
county and a majority of the cities within the county having a
majority of the population adopt resolutions providing for the
establishment of the authority; and
WHEREAS, the San Bernardino/riverside County Board of
Supervisors finds that a freeway emergency emergency motorist aid
system is needed to protect the safety of motorists on freeways;
and
WHEREAS, the San Bernardino/Riverside County Boar; of
Supervisors finds that a freeway emergency motorist aid system is
needed to reduce the time spent by law enforce:aent officers
responding to routine vehicle disablements; and
Wv1 ERE"AS SAFE will have responsibility for i nplenentinc
a freeway emergency motorist aid system in the San Bernardino/
Riverside County region,,
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVEDRESOLVEE'D AND ORDERED, that; the San
Bernardino/Riverside County Board of Supervisors hereby reque is
that a Service: Authority for Freeway .Emergencies be established
in San Bernardino/Riverside County pursuant to Section 2550 of
the Streets and Highways Codd.
BE IT FZ,',,RTHER RESOLVED that the San Bernardino/Riverside
County Board of Supervisors directs that the members of the San
Bernardino Associazed Governments and Riverside County Trans-
portation Commission shall serve as the. Service Authority for
Freeway Emergencies in the County of San Bernardino/Riverside
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Supervisors, County of
San Bernardino/Riverside, State of California, on this
day of , 1986, by the following vote,
AYES:
CES
ABSENT';
APPENDIX C
CITY POPULATIONS FOR RIVERSIDE AND
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES (1985 estimate)
Riverside County
Banning 16 , 000 Lake Elsinore 9 , 000
Beaumont 8 ,000 Marino Valley 55, 000
Blyth 8 ,000 Norco 22, 000
Cathedral City 16, 000 Palm Desert 15 , 000
Coachella 13 , 000 Palm Springs 39 , 000
Corona 43 , 000 Perris 91000
Desert Hot Springs 8 , 000 Rancho Mirage 8, 000
Hemet 28 , 000 Riverside 183 , 000
Indian Wells 2 , 000 San jacinto 10 , 000
Indio 28 , 000
La Quinta 61000
Total incorporated
Population 526 , 000
Unincorporated 323 , 500 -
San Bernardino Count
Adelanto 4, 000 Montclair 25, 000
Barstow 20 , 000 Needles 4, 000
Big Bear Lake 6 , 000 Ontario 108, 000
Chino 48 , 000 Rancho Cucamonga 65, 000
Colton 25 , 000 Redlands 50 , 000
Fontana 49 , 000 Rialto 47 , 000
Grand Terrace 10, 000 San Bernardino 135 ,000
Loma Linda 11 ,000 Upland 54 ,000
Victorville 20 , 000
Total incorporated
'Population 01 ,000
Unincorporated 373f00O
v LAK
4, .
748
.r,qA,
fiV
R4,41C.AJO 15
47q a104 �16 717-
RJ4. 7, Ze3
SAS "
z 01 9190
V X47 '
14f6