Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6020_CCv0001.pdf RESOLUTION NO. 6020 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS REGARDING, AND SUPPORTING THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF, A NEW MULTIPLEX COURTHOUSE IN DOWNTOWN SAN BERNARDINO WHEREAS,the City Council of the City of Redlands finds that several seismic studies have been commissioned regarding the San Bernardino County Central Courthouse; and WHEREAS,the studies have generally found that the performance of the 1926 constructed Central Courthouse in a major earthquake(magnitude 8.0 and greater)is expected to be questionable to poor, and that during a minor earthquake(magnitude 5.0 and below),the Courthouse is expected to be damaged but repairable; and WHEREAS, a Final Report for the San Bernardino County Court System Needs Assessment/Program Statement and Consolidated Courts Master Plan has been prepared by the Rosser/Carter Goble Team (the"Rosser Report"); and WHEREAS, the Council finds that the Central Courthouse is inadequate and cannot accommodate the needs of our growing community and the resulting need for more judicial services in the county seat; and WHEREAS, the most recent study of judicial needs has San Bernardino County slated for 20 to 22 new judgeships by 2006; and WHEREAS, the total number of filings in the Central Courthouse in 1996-97 was 114,942, the projected filings for 2010 is 166,975 and in 2020 is 204,498; and WHEREAS, there are not now, nor will there be, enough courtrooms to match the community's projected increased needs; and WHEREAS, with the advent of additional new judges over the next 5-10 years, there will not be any courtrooms available to house the new judges, and as the judicial demand increases, so does the demand for related staff members who cannot be housed in the current Courthouse; and WHEREAS,the current Courthouse is unsafe because there is no central location for security screening, and the ability to separate prisoners from victims,witnesses,jurors, staff and the public is virtually non-existent; and. 1:%CAv es 6020 1 WHEREAS,a new courthouse would incorporate the latest security advances to protect the public, victims,witnesses,jurors,judges, staff and prisoners; and WHEREAS,the Council finds that the lack of space in the current Courthouse does not allow for auxiliary and support agencies to be housed together and, therefore, such agencies are spread throughout the community; and WHEREAS,the construction of a new multiplex Courthouse would provide adequate space not only for judges,but for the District Attorney,the Public Defender,Probation Services,and Court Administration to better provide efficiency, economies of scale, court services and access for the community; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that, although the retrofitting of the current Courthouse is necessary to preserve a building of significant historical value, the retrofitting of the current Courthouse before building a new multiplex Courthouse would be ineffective and insufficient to meet the needs of the community; and WHEREAS, retrofitting the current Courthouse would only solve the seismic problem and not the problems regarding the lack of space for the public and the housing of additional judicial officers and their staff(in 1998,an estimated 2,651 people per day came to the Central Courthouse), the housing of auxiliary agencies to better serve the public,and the incorporation of the best security measures; and WHEREAS, the City Council supports the construction and operation of a new multiplex Central Courthouse in downtown San Bernardino to meet the increased requirement for additional judgeships, to improve security, to take advantage of technological and architectural advances, to improve efficiency, to increase judicial and public safety by improving the method of prisoner transportation, and to improve and expand public access to judicial services by housing auxiliary agencies in one facility thereby increasing the economies of scale,as well as the eventual retrofit and replacement of facilities that are seismically unsafe to preserve the historical components of the 1926 Central Courthouse. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redlands hereby requests as follows: Section 1. That the Board of Supervisors for the County of San Bernardino revisit the February 1999 Final Report for the San Bernardino County Court System Needs Assessment/Program Statement and Consolidated Courts Master Plan prepared by the Rosser/Carter Goble Team (at a cost to taxpayers of$500,000) and commence the process of constructing a new County Courthouse by allocating sufficient funds for that purpose, commencing with a Request for Proposals for the appropriate architectural and engineering plans from which a new Courthouse may be constructed sufficient to accommodate the judicial needs of the County, Court Administration, District Attorney, Public Defender, and Probation Services for this century. 1ARCARu 6020 2 Section 2. That the Board of Supervisors instruct the County lobbyists to work with our State Legislators and Congressional Representatives to secure such funding as may be available from Federal and State governments to assist in the funding for the construction of a new multiplex Courthouse in the City of San Bernardino, the County Seat of San Bernardino County. ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 19`' day of February, 2002. 7e- -;VL� Mayor of the City of Redlands Attest: City erk �/o 1,Lorrie Poyzer,City Clerk of the City of Redlands,hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19`' day of February 2002 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Peppler, Gilbreath, George, Harrison; Mayor Haws NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None City Cl 3 URCA''\Res 6020